Total knee arthroplasty in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures

Can ChatGPT Answer Patient Questions Regarding Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The internet has introduced many resources frequently accessed by patients prior to orthopaedic visits. Recently, Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer, an artificial intelligence-based chat application, has become publicly and freely available. The interface uses deep learning technology to mimic human interaction and provide convincing answers to questions posed by users. With its rapidly expanding usership, it is reasonable to assume that patients will soon use this technology for preoperative education. Therefore, we sought to determine the accuracy of answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) pertaining to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Ten FAQs were posed to the chatbot during a single online interaction with no follow-up questions or repetition. All 10 FAQs were analyzed for accuracy using an evidence-based approach. Answers were then rated as "excellent response not requiring clarification," "satisfactory requiring minimal clarification," satisfactory requiring moderate clarification," or "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification."Of the 10 answers given by the chatbot, none received an "unsatisfactory" rating with the majority either requiring minimal (5) or moderate (4) clarification. While many answers required nuanced clarification, overall, answers tended to be unbiased and evidence-based, even when presented with controversial subjects.The chatbot does an excellent job of providing basic, evidence-based answers to patient FAQs prior to TKA. These data were presented in a manner that will be easily comprehendible by most patients and may serve as a useful clinical adjunct in the future.

Transarterial microembolization for the management of refractory chronic joint pain in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disease significantly impacting both patient quality of life and socioeconomics. Traditional treatment options, including pharmacological and surgical interventions, are often limited. Advancements in our understanding of the pathological mechanisms behind OA indicate the involvement of pathological angiogenesis. Transarterial microembolization (TAME), a minimally invasive radiological procedure, may present an innovative therapeutic approach. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge and experiences regarding TAME as a therapeutic modality for alleviating chronic joint pain associated with OA. It explores the role of TAME, focusing on its indications, patient selection, clinical outcomes, and future perspectives. Potential complications and associated risks are systematically addressed, alongside proposed strategies for risk mitigation and effective management.The presented patient cases originate from our institution, supplemented by a thorough review of relevant literature retrieved from PubMed.TAME represents a promising therapeutic approach, providing relief from the burden of joint diseases and substantially enhancing patient quality of life. Clinical outcomes emphasize the efficacy and safety of TAME in mitigating pain and improving functional capabilities in patients with chronic joint pain associated with OA. With mounting evidence of its therapeutic benefits and applicability to numerous joint-related pathologies, TAME offers a valuable addition to the arsenal of treatments for these conditions. · TAME is an innovative therapy for treating chronic joint pain related to OA.. · TAME is a technically challenging minimally invasive intervention requiring a high level of expertise.. · Understanding the challenges and complications of TAME can reduce risk and enhance procedural outcomes.. · Wilms LM, Jannusch K, Weiss D et al. Transarterial microembolization for the management of refractory chronic joint pain in osteoarthritis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2288-5743.

What's important for recovery after a total knee replacement? A systematic review of mixed methods studies

BACKGROUND

Understanding how patients perceive and prioritise various aspects of recovery following total knee replacement, including pain, function and return to activity, will help clinicians in pre-operative consultations by ensuring they effectively address patient concerns and managing their expectations.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to identify aspects of recovery that are important to people after a total knee replacement.

METHODS

Studies were identified from Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. This mixed methods review included all original study types (quantitative, qualitative, discrete choice experiments and mixed methods design). Reviews and non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Studies with participants (age ≥ 18 years) who had a primary TKR for osteoarthritis were included. Studies of people with unicompartmental knee, patella-femoral or revision knee replacement were excluded. Recovery attributes were extracted from individual papers and grouped into recovery themes.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 8404 participants and 18 recovery themes were developed. The most frequently identified overarching theme was pain, followed by activities of daily living, mobility (walking), recreational activities, specific functional movements of the knee, use of walking aids, sexual activity and range of motion of the knee. Medical complications were an infrequently reported theme, however, was deemed to be high importance.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing pain, returning of activities and daily living and mobility are the three most frequently reported recovery domains for people after TKR. Clinicians should be aware of recovery themes, to ensure they are explored sufficiently when consenting for a TKR. Future research should aim to determine the relative importance of these attributes compared to each other. Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021253699.

Association Between Digitally Provided Education and 90-Day Return to Sexual Activity Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Contemporary total knee arthroplasty patients have increased expectations of returning to predisease function, including sexual activity (SA). The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients using a digital care management platform (DCMP) were more likely to have a higher rate and frequency of return to SA.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. A total of 304 patients were randomized to a DCMP (n = 119) providing preoperative and postoperative education regarding return to SA or standard postoperative care (control group; n = 185). Return to SA, assessed via questionnaire, patient-reported outcome measures, Timed Up and Go test, single leg stance, active range of motion and need for manipulation under anesthesia were assessed at 90 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

More patients in the DCMP group returned to SA compared to control at 90 days (58.4 versus 39.6%, P = .018); however, the control group resumed SA sooner (33.1 versus 42.0 days, P = .023). Patients who returned to SA were younger (61.6 versus 65.9 year), more often men (56 versus 35%) (P < .001), higher performing on the Timed Up and Go and single leg stance tests (P < .001), and had greater active range of motion (P = .007). There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures or need for manipulation under anesthesia between patients that returned to SA and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

More patients using a DCMP resumed SA at 90 days; however, patients in the control group returned to SA sooner. Those who returned to SA were younger, possessed greater physical function, and were more often men.

Incidence of Postoperative Infection Following Simultaneous Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopedic procedures. Simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty involves performing total knee arthroplasty on both knees in a single anesthetic session. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. A primary search was performed using PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of Science, Clarivate, and Google Scholar databases. Quantitative data synthesis was performed using MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.115 to determine the pooled prevalence of the infection among patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. We included 30 studies in our quantitative data synthesis, with a total population of 118,502 patients (237,004 knees). The pooled prevalence of superficial infection, deep infection, and unspecified surgical site infection was estimated to be 0.86% (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.13%), 0.84% (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.05%), and 1.18% (95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.27%), respectively. There was significant heterogeneity (I2 >50%) in all analyses, and inspection of funnel plots revealed a symmetrical distribution of plotted data. We found that the infection rates following simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty were relatively low but heterogeneous, as the data showed marked variability. Superficial infections were more common than deep infections; however, there was a small difference in their prevalence. Furthermore, the reliability of our findings was limited owing to significant heterogeneity.

2-year results of middle-aged patients with two-compartment cartilage lesions in one knee treated with two patient specific metal implants

PURPOSE

Focal chondral lesions of the femur are currently treated with biological repair or arthroplasty. However, some patients are not suitable for either one due to lesion size, age, or prior biological treatment attempts. While singular patient-specific focal mini metal implants already showed good results, the outcomes of bicompartmental implantation of these implants have not been discussed in the literature yet. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients who underwent bicompartmental implantation of two patient-specific implants.

METHODS

This prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative pilot study evaluates results up to two years after bicompartmental implantation of two implants (Episealer Implant, Episurf, Stockholm, Sweden). A damage report is compiled using a special MRI program and patient specific implants are manufactured, including 3D-printed surgical instruments to provide exact placement of the implant. The patients were assessed repeatedly using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain during the follow-up.

RESULTS

The scores were evaluated three, 12, and 24 months after surgery and showed good results. The median in both scores improved from 37.7 for the KOOS5 preoperatively to 69.1 after 24 months and from 69 for the VAS for pain preoperatively to 9 after 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Overall, for the small study group presented, the early results are promising. With noticeable improvement in KOOS and VAS for pain after two years, patient specific implants appear to become relevant in future standardized treatment of femoral chondral lesions. Especially with bicompartmental implantation, full arthroplasty can be delayed even further.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients Above and Under 65 Years Old Submitted to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objective  To compare the level of quality of life and satisfaction after two years of total knee arthroplasties between individuals above and below 65 years of age and to identify predictor factors of poor clinical outcome and low level of satisfaction in patients undergoing arthroplasty.

Methods  This is a retrospective cohort with data from patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis submitted to primary total knee arthroplasty from 2014 to 2018 ( n  = 190). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the following scores: visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, EQ-5D-3L and EUROQOL-VAS (quality of life scales), patient satisfaction level, and functional scale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), collected through a questionnaire applied preoperatively, as well as 1, 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Results  Patients < 65 years old presented significantly lower values (clinical worsening) in KOOS-pain and KOOS-symptoms. There are no differences in the principal clinical scores that assess pain, function, and quality of life after the procedure, as well as in the rate of satisfaction with the procedure, among patients < 65 years old when compared with patients ≥ 65 years old. It was also observed that patients who were not satisfied with the procedure in the 24-month evaluation presented clinical results in some analyzed scores (KOOS-pain and EQ-VAS) similar to patients who declared themselves satisfied.

Conclusion  Scores that assess pain, function, quality of life, as well as satisfaction rate are similar between patients < 65 years old and those ≥ 65 years old.

The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a target value on a patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) scale beyond which patients deem themselves to have attained an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to define the PASS thresholds for generic and knee-specific PROMs at 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 955 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis at a single institution was reviewed. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS). Responses to an anchor question assessing patients' overall rating of treatment results were dichotomized and used to determine if PASS was achieved. PASS thresholds for each PROM were selected based on the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Sensitivity analyses were performed for different subgroups (by age, gender, BMI), baseline score tertiles and an alternate definition of PASS.

RESULTS

In total, 92.7% reported their current state as acceptable. The areas under the curve (AUC) for ROCs were 0.72-0.83, except for the SF-36 PCS (AUC 0.64), indicating good discriminative accuracy of the other PROMs. PASS thresholds were 85.5 for KSKS, 77.5 for KSFS, 41.5 for OKS, 49.9 for SF-36 PCS and 54.6 for SF-36 MCS. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the thresholds were robust. Patients who attained a PASS were at least 4-5 times more likely to be satisfied and have expectations fulfilled.

CONCLUSION

PASS thresholds can be used to define treatment success in future outcome studies. At the individual level, they provide clinically relevant benchmarks for surgeons when assessing postoperative recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Excessive Sagittal Slope of the Tibia Component during Kinematic Alignment-Safety and Functionality at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and functional outcomes of excessive sagittal alignment in the unrestricted kinematic alignment technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective, single-center study was conducted between 2018 and 2020, including patients undergoing primary TKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. EOS imaging conducted before and after surgery was reviewed for overall alignment, and a number of measurements were taken, including sagittal tibial slope and other tibia and femur component positioning. Patients were interviewed and asked to fill out several questionnaires including a visual analog scale, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Overall, 225 patients (66.7%) had a sagittal tibial slope angle above 5° (excessive) and 112 (33.3%) patients had an angle under 5° (moderate). A significant improvement in pain and function scores was observed in both groups following the surgery (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the moderate and excessive groups in the average VAS, OKS or the various subtypes of the KOOS score. However, there was a slight but significant difference in the number of patients achieving MCID in KOOS symptoms. There were no cases of early failure or loosening. Unrestricted KA and the excessive sagittal alignment of the tibial component seem to be reliable and safe in terms of restoring daily function and alleviating pain after a minimum of 2 years following the surgery.

Evaluation of sexual quality of life after bilateral total hip arthroplasty surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients experience limitation of hip joint movement due to coxarthrosis, such limitation may affect the quality of sexual activity in patients. We aimed at investigating the postoperative quality of sexual life and evaluating the clinical satisfaction of patients who underwent bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS

Postoperative sexual life quality improvement in patients undergoing bilateral total hip arthroplasty increases clinical satisfaction.

METHODS

The study included patients who underwent staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty surgery between June 2016 and January 2019. Each patient was evaluated using the sexual quality of life-female (SQOL-F) or Sexual quality of life-male (SQOL-M) questionnaire containing similar questions for both genders regarding sexual satisfaction.

RESULTS

Among all the individuals, 32 were sexually active (13 females, 19 males), and seven were not sexually active (6 females, 1 male) before the surgery. Among the 29 individuals (18 females, 11 males) who thought that their sexual life was negatively affected even before the surgery, 10 (1 female, 9 males) were found not to be negatively affected. Moreover, the sexual life of 18 females was negatively affected 27.93±14.5 months (range, 12-43) before hip arthroplasty and 11 males was negatively affected 19.5±11.0 months (range, 8-31) before the surgery as well. Twenty (10 females, 10 males) individuals stated an improvement in their sexual life, 13 (6 females, 7 males) individuals stated no change. Unfortunately, 6 (3 females, 3 males) individuals stated a degradation of their sexual activity after hip arthroplasty. Patients gained more than 60 degrees of hip range of motion and experienced significant reduction in pain after hip joint movements after surgery.

DISCUSSIONS

In our study, we evaluated sexual limitations before and after total hip arthroplasty surgery and postoperative sexual quality of life. Due to the increased range of motion of patients after surgery, the proportion of sexually active individuals increased and the sexual quality of life reached a satisfactory level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective cohort study.

Mild knee osteoarthritis predicts dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 186 patients aged 65 years or less with 2-year follow-up

Background and aims

The incidence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing, especially among younger working-age patients. However, dissatisfaction rates in this population are higher than among older patients. The aim of this study was to assess the rates of dissatisfaction and persistent pain after TKA and to evaluate those factors that predict these outcomes.

Material and methods

In total, 186 patients undergoing unilateral TKA aged 65 years or less were enrolled into this prospective observational study with 2-year follow-up. To assess the outcome, the visual analogue scales regarding satisfaction and persistent pain at rest and during exercise were used. In addition, the association between patients´ demographics, radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and dissatisfaction and persistent pain were tested by univariate logistic regression analysis. Mild OA was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 2 and severe OA as KL grade 3–4. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis was also conducted to test statistically significant relations.

Results

After 2 years, 12 % (n = 23) of patients were dissatisfied with the outcome of TKA, 27 % (n = 50) reported persistent pain during exercise and 10 % (n = 18) at rest. Patients with mild knee OA were significantly more dissatisfied (28.6 %) than patients with more severe OA (8.7 %) (p = 0.003). Younger patients had an increased risk for both dissatisfaction and persistent pain. Apart from KOOS Quality of Life, poor preoperative KOOS subscores were also predictive for these outcomes.

Conclusion

Mild radiographic knee OA was the main predicting factor for dissatisfaction after TKA. Thus, performing TKA for such patients should be carefully considered. Furthermore, these patients should be informed about the increased risk for dissatisfaction and the same seems to apply to younger patients. Interestingly, when TKA is performed for patients with more severe knee OA, the satisfaction rates seem to be somewhat higher than those previously reported.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT03233620) on 28 July 2017.

Minimally Invasive High Tibial Osteotomy Using a Patient-Specific Cutting Guide

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) is an excellent surgical option for patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. This article presents a technique of performing a minimally invasive OW-HTO using a patient-specific cutting guide (PSCG). Preoperative 3-dimensional planning with computed tomography imaging is essential. The correction parameters, the final plate position, as well as the 3-dimensional position of the hinge as well as wedge are verified preoperatively before the PSCG is produced. After exposure with an oblique incision over the posteromedial tibia, the hamstring tendons are released for later re-attachment and the medial collateral ligament is released slightly. The PSCG is then used to perform the OW-HTO with protection of the posterior neurovascular structures by a retractor placed posterior to the medial collateral ligament. The final fixation of the osteotomy is achieved with a low-profile locking plate and a femoral head allograft wedge.

Early post-operative oxford knee score and knee society score predict patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is poor correlation between functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We asked if early post-operative scores at 6 months or the pre- to post-operative change in scores are predictive of patient satisfaction 2 years after TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected registry data of 4359 TKAs performed at a single institution. At 6 months and 2 years, the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Short-Form 36 scores were assessed. A satisfaction questionnaire was also completed. Logistic regression was used to generate receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the ability of each scoring system in predicting satisfaction at 2 years.

RESULTS

At 2 years, 91.1% of patients were satisfied. For the absolute post-operative OKS at 6 months, an AUC of 0.762 (95% CI 0.736-0.788) and a threshold of ≤ 21.5 points (or ≥ 38.5 points on the new scale) were obtained. For the KSS knee score, an AUC of 0.704 (95% CI 0.674-0.734) and a threshold of ≥ 80.5 points were identified. The OKS performed significantly better than the KSS knee score (p = 0.03) and the other post-operative scores (p < 0.001). When analysing the change in scores pre-operatively to 6 months, the AUC was < 0.7 for all scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-operative scores, specifically the OKS and KSS knee score, can predict patient satisfaction at 2 years after TKA with good accuracy. The threshold values offer surgeons an additional tool to identify patients at risk of dissatisfaction at 2 years, enabling them to intervene earlier to ensure good patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Patients' experiences and satisfaction at one year following primary total knee arthroplasty: A focus-group discussion

OBJECTIVE

To date, no study has explored patients' experiences, outcome expectations and satisfaction 1-year post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using focus-group discussion (FGD). The exploration of patients' expectations, functional recovery and limitations may support future modifications and thus improve outcomes post-TKA.

METHODS

An FGD was conducted with patients at 1-year post-TKA. Moderators led the discussion using a semistructured discussion guide. The discussion was digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed to formulate themes.

RESULTS

The study identified four main themes: recovery experience post-TKA, experience before TKA, activity of daily living (ADL) changes post-TKA and post-TKA outcome expectations. The recovery experience theme explores the overall experience post-TKA in terms of symptoms and progression issues; their experience with the orthopaedic surgeon and physiotherapy; and the differences between first and second knee replacements. The experience before TKA theme discusses many issues raised by patients that they believed strongly affected TKA outcomes and their satisfaction, such as the referral process, ADL limitations before TKA and their beliefs about post-TKA outcomes. The ADL changes post-TKA theme discusses the diversity of functional improvements, limitations and new functional ability. The outcome expectation theme explores what the patients expected to gain from surgery and the factors that modified those expectations, and whether their expectations were met.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient attitude, sufficient preoperative education, outcome expectation modification, communication with the surgeon and patients taking an active role in rehabilitation can all affect post-TKA outcomes and satisfaction. Hence, the recommendation is to address all of these issues before TKA to enhance outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of literature defining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Knee Society Scores (KSS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and no data on the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for KSS have been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine MCID and SCB for the KSS in patients with primary TKA.

METHODS

The median age of patients was 71.6 (range 50-88) years, and 60.3% were females 507 patients with TKA were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the KSS before surgery and at second postoperative year. The MCID values of the KSS were estimated using anchor-based method, distribution-based method and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with calculation of the area under curve (AUC). SCB was estimated using ROC.

RESULTS

The MCID for KSS-knee score was 7.2 points by the anchor-based method, 7.2 by the distribution-based method, and using a ROC analysis the cutoff point was 8.9 points with an AUC of 0.75. For KSS-function score, the MCID values were 9.7, 6.3, and 10.3 (AUC 0.71), respectively. SCB values were 39.7 points (AUC 0.74) for the KSS-knee score, and 38.6 (AUC 0.76) for the KSS-function score. Logistic regression showed age and Charlson index to negatively affect the changes in KSS.

CONCLUSION

Different methods for MCID calculation lead to different results. With the use of ROC curve analysis, patients with an improvement of at least 9 points for KSS-knee and 10 points for KSS-function scores experience a clinically important change, whereas those who have at least an improvement of 40 points for KSS-knee and 39 points for KSS-function scores experience a substantial clinical benefit. These findings can ensure clinical improvement from the patient's perspective and also aid in interpreting results from clinical studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Quantitative evaluation of gait features after total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with age and sex-matched controls

BACKGROUND

Gait function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is suboptimal. However, quantified analysis with comparing a control group is lacking.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aims of this study were 1) to compare the gait before and after TKA and 2) to compare postoperative gait to that of an age-sex matched control group.

METHODS

This study consisted of 46 female and 38 male patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who underwent bilateral TKA, and 84 age- and sex-matched controls without knee pain and osteoarthritis. Seven gait parameters, including lower extremity alignment, knee adduction moment (KAM), knee flexion angle, external knee flexion moment, hip adduction angle, external hip adduction moment, and the varus-valgus arc during the stance phase, were collected using a commercial opto-electric gait analysis system. Principal component analysis was used for data processing and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) of the principal component scores were compared.

RESULTS

The most significant gait change after TKA was the alignment (SMD 1.62, p < 0.001). The average stance phase alignment changed from varus 7.3° to valgus 0.5°. The second significant change was a decrease of the KAM (SMD 1.08, p < 0.001). These two features were closely correlated (r = 0.644, p < 0.001). The gait feature that differed most from the controls was the varus-valgus arc during the stance phase (SMD 1.68, p < 0.001), which was constrained by 31% after TKA (p < 0.001) and was only 37% compared to the controls (p < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Improvement in gait after TKA was obtained through alignment correction. However, TKA significantly constrained coronal knee motion. TKA improved gait suboptimally; the gait was significantly different from that of controls.

Fulfilment of preoperative expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. A prospective analysis of 200 patients

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the association between preoperative patient expectations, their postoperative fulfilment, and satisfaction is not well understood. The aim of this study was to quantify these relationships in a cohort of TKA patients with differing socio-economic backgrounds from across Scotland.

METHODS

Expectations of 200 patients undergoing TKA were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectation Score. Postoperatively, expectation fulfilment was assessed at six weeks and one year. Satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale. Preoperative and postoperative scores were compared across satisfaction groups. Relationships between individual and overall expectation fulfilment, satisfaction, and demographics were analysed.

RESULTS

At six weeks, 30% of expectations were fulfilled, increasing to 48% at one year. Corresponding satisfaction rates were 84% and 89%. Higher fulfilment scores were associated with greater satisfaction. Fulfilment of pain and mobility expectations were most predictive of satisfaction. Expectations of kneeling, squatting, paid work and sexual function went unfulfilled. Preoperative expectations were not related to postoperative satisfaction. Males had higher postoperative fulfilment scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a clear association between fulfilment of preoperative expectations and patient satisfaction following TKA. However, less than 50% of patient expectations were completely fulfilled. While higher fulfilment scores were predictive of greater satisfaction, low overall fulfilment score did not preclude satisfaction. The high correlation of pain and function expectation fulfilment with satisfaction emphasises the need to relate these as appropriate preoperative expectations, while awareness of unfulfilled expectations may allow engagement with and resolution of ongoing concerns and disappointments.

Functional outcome of total knee replacement: a study protocol for a prospective, double-blinded, parallel-group randomized, clinical controlled trial of novel, personalized and conventional implants

BACKGROUND

The development of total knee replacement (TKR) implant designs aims to improve outcome regarding pain, function, joint stiffness, instability, patellar problems, and ultimately wear of the implant. Recently, two major orthopaedic implant manufacturers launched a new generation of TKR implants which, according to the manufacturers, provide improved functional outcome. However, the benefits of these new TKR designs claimed by the manufacturers in terms of improved functional outcome still lack scientific documentation. The present randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare three fixed bearing, cemented cruciate-retaining (CR) designs; one of the new personalized TKR design with two conventional TKR designs with the main emphasis being on functional outcome.

METHODS

The present study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, single-center intervention trial. A total of 240 patients will be recruited to participate in a parallel-group study at Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland. We will compare the short-term functional outcome of TKR performed with a novel personalized TKR design (Persona CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) against TKRs performed with two conventional designs (PFC CR, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA and Nexgen CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA). In total, 80 patients will be randomized in each of the three study arms. The primary outcome in this study is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), which is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Secondary outcome measures include the Forgotten Joint Score, the 15D, the UCLA activity score, and the VAS pain scale. The results will be analyzed after 2-year follow-up.

DISCUSSION

This paper presents a prospective, randomized, single-center trial study protocol. It provides details of patient randomization, PROMs, follow-up, methods of analysis of the material, and publication plan. An important aspect that will be considered in the study will be the economic effects of the novel designs as they are substantially more expensive, and the benefits of the added costs remain unknown. In addition, it is especially important to carry out evaluative studies in independent centers that are not biased by the interests of the manufacturers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered, November, 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03339557 .

Income change after cruciate ligament injury - A population-based study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between choice of treatment and patients' income after cruciate ligament (CL) injury and assess the effect of different covariates such as sex, age, comorbidities and type of work.

METHODS

This entire-population cohort study in Sweden included working patients with a diagnosed CL injury between 2002 and 2005, identified in The National Swedish Patient Register (n = 13,662). The exposure was the treatment choice (operative or non-operative treatment). The main outcome measure was average yearly income five years after CL diagnosis, adjusted for the following covariates: sex, age, comorbidities, type of work, region, calendar year, education and income.

RESULTS

Relative to non-operative treatment, operative treatment was associated with greater average yearly incomes (nine to 15%) after injury among patients between 20 and 50 years, patients with partial university education, patients living in large cities and patients with one comorbidity, despite no overall significant association in the national cohort. Delayed operative treatment (>1 year) had no significant association with income change, whereas early operative treatment (<1 year) was associated with higher average yearly incomes (11 to 16%) among females, patients between 20 and 50 years, patients living in large cities and patients with one comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In a broad sense, treatment choice was not associated with changes in income five years after CL injuries among patients in the workforce, however earlier operative treatment was associated with higher average incomes among patients with ages between 20 and 50, females, living in large cities, with one comorbidity and with a high level of education.

Health costs and efficiencies of patient-specific and single-use instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial

Aim

To investigate whether patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and single-use instrumentation (SUI) improve operating room efficiency in terms of time and cost to the healthcare provider over conventional/reusable instrumentation (CVR) when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Patients and methods

Patients requiring TKA were randomised into one of four surgical groups: CVR, CVS (conventional/SUI), PSR (PSI/reusable) and PSS (PSI/SUI). All surgical procedures were video recorded to determine specific surgical time intervals. Other variables reported included the number of instrument trays used, missing equipment, direct instrument costs and the weight of the instruments the staff had to handle. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), estimated blood loss and lengths of hospital stay were also recorded as markers of patient experience.

Results

PSR was significantly quicker in all the recorded time intervals, used less trays, experienced less missing equipment and resulted in lower blood loss and shorter hospital stays. SUI reported significantly slower operating room times and resulted in higher blood loss, but SUI was 88% lighter and 20% cheaper on average when compared with their reusable counterparts. Despite the economic advantages of PSI and SUI, the patients who reported greatest improvements in OKS were those allocated to the CVR group, but no clinically meaningful difference in OKS was found at any time point.

Conclusions

PSI and SUI for TKA have the potential of reducing operating room times over conventional, reusable sets. This reduction will benefit theatre personnel ergonomically, while presenting the healthcare provider with potential cost-saving benefits in terms of reduced sterilisation costs and surgical times.

Which patients are satisfied with their overall outcome but dissatisfied with their return to recreational activities after total knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patients dissatisfied with both recreational activities and overall outcome were different to those dissatisfied with recreational activities but satisfied with their overall outcome one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort consisting of 3324 primary TKA were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form (SF) 12 scores were collected pre-operatively and one year post-operatively. Overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction with recreational activities were assessed at one year.

RESULTS

The rate of patient satisfaction with recreational activities (n = 2672, 80.4%) was significantly (odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.41 to 0.54, p < 0.001) lower than satisfaction with the overall outcome (n = 2982, 89.7%). When adjusting for confounding variables older age (OR 1.03, p = 0.008), increasing BMI (OR 1.05, p = 0.01) and absence of hypertension (OR 0.66, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of being dissatisfied with recreational activities in isolation. The one-year components and total WOMAC scores were significant (p < 0.001) predictors of satisfaction with recreational activities and were reliable with an area under the curve of ≥0.82 CONCLUSION: Patients of older age, higher BMI and without hypertension are more likely to be dissatisfied with recreational activities despite being satisfied with their overall outcome.

Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or less: a prospective study of 232 patients with 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Previous studies have reported lower implant survival rates, residual pain, and higher patient dissatisfaction rates following knee arthroplasty in younger knee arthroplasty patients. We aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of knee arthroplasty in a prospective non-selected cohort of patients aged 65 years or less with 2-year follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 250 patients (272 knees) aged 65 years or less were enrolled into this prospective cohort study. Patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess the outcome.

RESULTS

The mean Oxford Knee Score and all Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales increased significantly (p < 0.001) from preoperative situation to the 2-year follow-up. Significant increase (p < 0.001) in physical activity was detected in High-Activity Arthroplasty Score and RAND-36 Physical Component Score (PCS). Pain was also significantly (p < 0.001) relieved during the follow-up. Total disappearance of pain was rare at 2 years. Patients with milder (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2) osteoarthritis were less satisfied and reported poorer patient-reported outcome measure than those with advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4). There was no difference in the outcome (any patient-reported outcome measure) between patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and those who received unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

We found that measured with a wide set of patient-reported outcome measures, both total knee arthroplasty and unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in significant pain relief, as well as improvement in physical performance and quality of life in patients aged 65 years or less. Real-world effectiveness of these procedures seems to be excellent. 15% of patients still had residual symptoms and were dissatisfied with the outcome at 2 years after the operation.

Does ethnicity and education influence preoperative disability and expectations in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty?

AIM

To investigate whether minority ethnicity and the duration of education influence preoperative disability and expectations in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We prospectively included 829 patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from April 2013 to December 2014 at a single centre. Patients filled in pre-operative questionnaires with information regarding place of birth, duration of education, expectations for outcome of surgery and baseline characteristics. Patients were stratified based on ethnicity. Majority ethnicity was defined as born in the study country and minority ethnicity was defined as born in any other country. Similarly, patients were stratified based on duration of education in groups defined as < 9 years, 9-12 years and > 12 years, respectively.

RESULTS

We found that 92.2% of patients were of majority ethnicity. We found that 24.5%, 44.8% and 30.8% of patients had an education of < 9 years, 9-12 years and > 12 years, respectively. The mean preoperative (pre-OP) oxford knee score (OKS) in the total population was 23.6. Patients of minority ethnicity had lower mean pre-OP OKS (18.6 vs 23.9, P < 0.001), higher pain levels (VAS 73.0 vs 58.7, P < 0.001), expected higher levels of post-OP pain (VAS 14.1 vs 6.1, P = 0.02) and of overall symptoms (VAS 16.6 vs 6.4, P = 0.006). Patients with > 12 years education had lower mean pre-OP OKS (21.5 vs 23.8 and 24.6, P < 0.001) and higher pre-OP VAS pain (65.4 vs 59.2 and 56.4, P < 0.001) compared to groups with shorter education. One year post-operative (post-OP) patients of minority ethnicity had lower mean OKS, higher pain and lower QoL. One year post-OP patients with > 12 years education reported higher pain compared to patients with shorter educations. However, the response-rate was low (44.6%), and therefore post-OP results were not considered to be significant.

CONCLUSION

Minority ethnicity and the duration of education influence preoperative disability and expectation in patients undergoing TKA. This should be taken into account when patients are advised pre-operatively.

Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in a high degree of patient satisfaction, as it provides patients with considerable medium- and long-term benefits in terms of quality of life, pain relief and function. Nevertheless, the literature reports that up to 30% of patients are dissatisfied. This dissatisfaction is directly related to the patients' quality of life, which they deem insufficient. Their quality of life depends on many physical, behavioural, social and psychological factors that are not taken into account by functional outcome scores. After describing the principles of quality of life evaluation after TKA, we will assess the effects of patient-related factors, the surgical technique and postoperative program through an exhaustive review of the literature. Patient expectations after TKA will then be outlined, particularly return to work and return to sports.

Comparable outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years than in older patients: a matched prospective study with minimum follow-up of 10 years

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after TKA for osteoarthritis between patients younger than 55 years and older patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 61 patients aged 55 years or younger was prospectively matched for gender, body mass index and knee function with patients with median age of 66 (range 60-70) years. Clinical evaluation was performed by the Knee Society scores (KSS), reduced Western Ontario and McMasters Universities (WOMAC) and Short-Form 12 (SF12) questionnaires. Radiological evaluation was also performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 12 (range 10-14) years. Survival at 14 years was 96.7% (95% CI 92-100%) in the younger group and 98.2% (95% CI 95-100%) in the older group (n.s.). There was no deep infection or loosening of femoral or patellar component in either group. In the younger group, 2 patients required revision (aseptic tibial loosening at 8 years, and polyethylene wear at 10 years). In the older group, there was 1 revision (aseptic tibial loosening). Revision rate was not significantly different (n.s.). Multivariate analysis showed no significant relationship between revision and age, gender or BMI. At 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups in KSS knee or function, WOMAC pain or function, or SF12 physical or mental, but in the last evaluation there were better results in younger patients for KSS-function (p = 0.018), WOMAC-function (p = 0.028), SF12-physical (p = 0.001) and SF12-mental (p = 0.035), although these differences were not clinically relevant. A significant decline was noted for KSS-function in either group from 5-year to at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The TKA survival in younger patients was comparable to older active patients, without increased complications or revisions at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Primary hybrid TKA can provide successful pain relief, function and quality of life in younger patients than 55 years with osteoarthritis. TKA is a suitable option for these young patients with appropriate surgical indications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

Despite reduction in radiological outliers in previous randomized trials comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), no differences in short-term functional outcomes were observed. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was improvement in functional outcomes and quality-of-life (QoL) measures between robotic-assisted and conventional TKA.

METHODS

All 60 knees (31 robotic-assisted; 29 conventional) from a previous randomized trial were available for analysis. Differences in range of motion, Knee Society (KSS) knee and function scores, Oxford Knee scores (OKS), SF-36 subscale and summative (physical PCS/mental component scores MCS) were analysed. In addition, patient satisfaction, fulfilment of expectations and the proportion attaining a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in KSS, OKS and SF-36 were studied.

RESULTS

Both robotic-assisted and conventional TKA displayed significant improvements in majority of the functional outcome scores at 2 years. Despite having a higher rate of complications, the robotic-assisted group displayed a trend towards higher scores in SF-36 QoL measures, with significant differences in SF-36 vitality (p = 0.03), role emotional (p = 0.02) and a larger proportion of patients achieving SF-36 vitality MCID (48.4 vs 13.8 %, p = 0.009). No significant differences in KSS, OKS or satisfaction/expectation rates were noted.

CONCLUSION

Subtle improvements in patient QoL measures were observed in robotic-assisted TKA when compared to conventional TKA. This finding suggests that QoL measures may be more sensitive and clinically important than surgeon-driven objective scores in detecting subtle functional improvements in robotic-assisted TKA patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Preoperative characteristics of working-age patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Objective

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is performed more in working-age (<65 years) patients. Until now, research in this patient population has been conducted mainly among retired (≥65 years) patients. Aim of this study was therefore to describe demographic, physical, psychological and social characteristics of working TKA patients and to subsequently compare these characteristics with retired TKA patients and the general population.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis. Preoperative data of 152 working TKA patients was used. These data were compared with existing data of retired TKA patients in hospital registers and with normative values from literature on the general population. Demographic, physical, psychological and social (including work) characteristics were analyzed.

Results

The majority (83.8%) of working TKA patients was overweight (42.6%) or obese (41.2%), a majority (72.4%) was dealing with two or more comorbidities, and most (90%) had few depressive symptoms. Mean physical activity level was 2950 minutes per week. Compared to the retired TKA population, working TKA patients perceived significantly more stiffness and better physical functioning and vitality, were more physically active, and perceived better mental health. Compared to the general population working TKA patients perceived worse physical functioning, worse physical health and better mental health, and worked fewer hours.

Conclusion

This study shows that a majority of working TKA patients are overweight/obese, have multiple comorbidities, but are highly active in light-intensity activities and have few depressive symptoms. Working patients scored overall better on preoperative characteristics than retired patients, and except for physical activity scored overall worse than the general population.

Effects of perceptions of care, medical advice, and hospital quality on patient satisfaction after primary total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study

Introduction

The increase in the number of patients presenting with osteoarthritis in the past decade has led to a 32% increase in knee replacement surgeries designed to reduce restrictions on patient movement and improve their quality of life. Patient satisfaction is becoming an increasingly important indicator of quality of care. This study was designed to identify predictors of various service components in the treatment process and hospital key performance indicators significantly associated with patient satisfaction.

Materials and methods

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted with 856 patients having their primary total knee replacements at 41 hospitals. Patient satisfaction was queried via a validated, multidimensional questionnaire mainly using a six-point scale. In addition to bivariate calculations, patient satisfaction was the dependent variable in a binary logistic regression model.

Results

The bivariate analysis showed a strong association between satisfaction and sex (male or female), the patients’ health before admission, and the length of stay. The number of cases treated at each hospital did not reveal any impact on satisfaction. The multivariate analysis identified three predictors associated with overall satisfaction. The strongest factor was the treatment outcome and the weakest was the quality of food. It became apparent that the statutory procedure minimums were not being met.

Conclusions

The relevant factors influencing patient satisfaction were partially the same as previous study results and allowed more detailed conclusions. The results provide suggestions across hospitals that could help health care providers better meet needs of patients after knee arthroplasties.

Improvements in Sexual Activity After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Sexual limitations in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are poorly understood.

METHODS

Surveys were designed to assess preoperative and postoperative sexual function, and limitations were retrospectively administered to 91 sexually active TKA patients at an average of 2.1 years (range, 0.5-4.0) after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative responses were compared using 1-tailed and 2-proportion z tests, with P < .05 as the threshold for significance.

RESULTS

Before TKA, sexual quality and/or frequency was limited in 45% of patients because of their knee. Patients experienced an average 17.1 months (range, 0-60) of sexual limitations before surgery, resulting largely from pain (87%) and diminished range of motion or flexibility (44%). Fifty-five percent of patients reported the need to change their sexual positions to accommodate their knee, with 97% of these patients indicating the need to avoid kneeling during sex. Postoperatively, fewer patients had to adjust their sexual positions to accommodate their knee (55% vs 28%, P = .0005), and avoid bearing weight on the afflicted knee during sex (97% vs 79%, P = .0213). Patients resumed sexual activity after an average of 2.4 months (range, 0-18). Despite these general improvements, 25% of individuals had less sex in the first year after surgery. After 1 year of recovery, however, 60% indicated that they more easily engaged in sexual activity than in the previous year, with 84% of these patients experiencing less pain, and 30% experiencing greater mobility or range of motion.

CONCLUSION

TKA does not eliminate sexual limitations, but it significantly decreases kneeling dysfunction and gives patients more liberty in selecting their sexual positions.

Different incidences of knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries

Background and purpose - The annual number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) has increased worldwide in recent years. To make projections regarding future needs for primaries and revisions, additional knowledge is important. We analyzed and compared the incidences among 4 Nordic countries Patients and methods - Using Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) data from 4 countries, we analyzed differences between age and sex groups. We included patients over 30 years of age who were operated with TKA or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the period 1997-2012. The negative binomial regression model was used to analyze changes in general trends and in sex and age groups. Results - The average annual increase in the incidence of TKA was statistically significant in all countries. The incidence of TKA was higher in women than in men in all 4 countries. It was highest in Finland in patients aged 65 years or more. At the end of the study period in 2012, Finland's total incidence was double that of Norway, 1.3 times that of Sweden and 1.4 times that of Denmark. The incidence was lowest in the youngest age groups (< 65 years) in all 4 countries. The proportional increase in incidence was highest in patients who were younger than 65 years. Interpretation - The incidence of knee arthroplasty steadily increased in the 4 countries over the study period. The differences between the countries were considerable, with the highest incidence in Finland. Patients aged 65 years or more contributed to most of the total incidence of knee arthroplasty.

Expectations of younger patients concerning activities after knee arthroplasty: are we asking the right questions?

PURPOSE

Indications for total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty (KA) have expanded to younger patients, in which Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) often show ceiling effects. This might be due to higher expectations. Our aims were to explore expectations of younger patients concerning activities in daily life, work and leisure time after KA and to assess to what extent PROMs meet and evaluate these activities of importance.

METHODS

Focus groups were performed among osteoarthritis (OA) patients <65 years awaiting KA, in which they indicated what activities they expected to perform better in daily life, work and leisure time after KA. Additionally, 28 activities of daily life, 17 of work and 27 of leisure time were depicted from seven PROMS, which were rated on importance, frequency and bother. A total score, representing motivation for surgery, was also calculated.

RESULTS

Data saturation was reached after six focus groups including 37 patients. Younger OA patients expect to perform better on 16 activities after KA, including high-impact leisure time activities. From the PROMs, daily life and work activities were rated high in both importance and motivation for surgery, but for leisure time activities importance varied highly between patients. All seven PROMs score activities of importance, but no single PROM incorporates all activities rated important.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients expect to perform better on many activities of daily life, work and leisure time after KA, and often at demanding levels. To measure outcomes of younger patients, we suggest using PROMs that include work and leisure time activities besides daily life activities, in which preferably scored activities can be individualized.

Outcome Assessment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative developed a core outcome set (COS) of domains to assess effectiveness of interventions for knee osteoarthritis. These domains (pain, physical function, patient global assessment, imaging at 1 year) should be assessed in every trial to make research evidence meaningful and comparable. We systematically evaluated and critically appraised the use of measurement instruments and outcome domains in prospective studies evaluating patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and assessed their accordance with the OMERACT COS.

METHODS

Literature search was performed until August 26, 2014, in Medline and Embase. Clinical trials and prospective observational studies with ≥50 participants and a follow-up of ≥1 year were included. We collected general study characteristics, comprehensive information on measurement instruments, and corresponding domains used.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified low accordance of used outcome domains with the OMERACT COS of domains published in 1997. Only 4 of 100 included studies included all recommended core domains. Pain (85% of studies) and physical function (86%) were assessed frequently, whereas patient global assessment (21%) and joint imaging (≥1 year; 27%) were rarely assessed. There was substantial heterogeneity in the use of measurement instruments (n = 111) investigating TKA.

CONCLUSION

More efforts are required to implement the existing COS. In addition, a more consistent use of adequate measurement instruments is important to make research evidence on TKA more relevant, better comparable, and thus more useful for guideline developers and clinical decision makers.

Patient-Reported Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction Rates in Young Patients Aged 50 Years or Younger After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown a discrepancy between traditional functional outcomes and patient satisfaction, with some reporting less than 85% satisfaction in older patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As native knee biomechanics are not completely replicated, the resulting functional limitations may cause dissatisfaction in higher-demand individuals. Few studies have recorded patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life scores, and patient satisfaction in a young population undergoing TKA.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-six primary TKAs were performed in 114 patients aged 50 years or younger (mean age, 47.0 years; range, 30-50 years) at a single institution. The main diagnoses were osteoarthritis (85%) and rheumatoid arthritis (10%).

RESULTS

The range of motion, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical and Mental Component Scores of Short Form-36 increased significantly (P < .001). At 2 years, 85.3% of patients had good/excellent knee scores, 71.3% had good/excellent function scores, 94.9% met the minimal clinically important difference for the Oxford Knee Score, and 84.6% met the minimal clinically important difference for the Physical Component Score. We found that 88.8% of patients were satisfied with their surgeries, whereas 86.8% had their expectations fulfilled. Survivorship using revision as an end point was 97.8% at a mean of 7 years (range, 3-16 years).

CONCLUSION

Patients aged 50 years or younger undergoing TKA can experience significant improvements in their quality of life, have their expectations met, and be satisfied with their surgeries, at rates similar to those of non-age-restricted populations. Surgeons should inform them of these benefits and the potential risk of revision surgery in the future, albeit increasingly shown to be low.

Are We Subluxating Knees in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Cadaveric Investigation

BACKGROUND

In comparison to coronal, sagittal, and rotational alignment, translational alignment parameters have been widely neglected in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) so far. As there is a certain variable range of possible component placement in mediolateral, ventrodorsal, and proximodistal direction, we hypothesized that relative positions between the femoral and tibial bones are changed after TKA, resulting in a subluxation of knees.

METHODS

In 10 knees of Thiel-embalmed whole body cadavers, the relative position between the femur and the tibia during passive flexion was measured before and after TKA by means of a navigational device.

RESULTS

After TKA, in extension, femoral bones in average shifted 5.3 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 4.0, P = .002) laterally and 2.4 mm (SD = 3.1, P = .038) proximally in extension which, however, decreased throughout flexion. Furthermore, the ventrodorsal femoral position was altered, resulting in a slight relative dorsal shift (2.6 mm, SD = 4.5, P = .099) in extension, which continuously changed into a ventral shift (2.6 mm, SD = 4.3, P = .087) during flexion.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation reveals changed translational parameters between the tibia and the femur after TKA. The resulting subluxation of the knee may be responsible for changed kinematic patterns. These changes in tibofemoral position should be considered in future biomechanical studies. Main reasons for this effect might be a noncentral placement of tibial and femoral implants in relation to the proximal tibial and distal femoral anatomy, obscured intraoperative articular geometry, symmetric implants, and operative techniques. Smaller steps between different component sizes, asymmetric tibial implant design, or individual (anatomic) implants could help to minimize subluxation in TKA.

Anatomic Versus Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to compare the intra-operative benefits and the clinical outcomes from kinematic or mechanical alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients undergoing revision of failed unicompartmental kneel arthroplasty (UKA) to TKA.

Methods:

Ten revisions were performed with a kinematic alignment technique and 11 with a mechanical alignment. Measurements of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were performed using long-leg radiographs. The need for augments, stems, and constrained inserts was compared between groups. Clinical outcomes were compared using the WOMAC score along with maximum distance walked as well as knee range of motion obtained prior to discharge. All data was obtained by a retrospective review of patient files.

Results:

The kinematic group required less augments, stems, and constrained inserts than the mechanical group and thinner polyethylene bearings. There were significant differences in the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) between the two groups (p<0.05). The mean WOMAC score obtained at discharge was better in the kinematic group as was mean knee flexion. At last follow up of 34 months for the kinematic group and 58 months for the mechanical group, no orthopedic complications or reoperations were recorded.

Conclusion:

Although this study has a small patient cohort, our results suggest that kinematic alignment for TKA after UKA revision is an attractive method. Further studies are warranted.

Age and Preoperative Knee Society Score Are Significant Predictors of Outcomes Among Asians Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The ability to predict patients' functional outcomes will add value to preoperative counseling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictors of good outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among Asian patients.

METHODS

Registry data from 2006 to 2010 were extracted. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary (PCS) were used to evaluate outcomes. A "good outcome" was defined as an improvement in scores of greater than or equal to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the primary analysis. The MCID for the OKS was 5, and the MCID for the PCS was 10. For the sensitivity analyses, a "good outcome" was defined as an OKS of <30 and a PCS score of >50. Clinical variables were used to develop a multiple logistic regression model for a good outcome following total knee arthroplasty at 5 years.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available for 3,062 patients who underwent primary TKA (mean age of 66.4 years; 79.5% female). Eighty-five percent had a good outcome on the basis of the OKS and 83%, on the basis of the SF-36 PCS. Age and preoperative Knee Society score (KSS) were found to be significant predictors. When outcomes were assessed by the MCID, lesser age and lower (worse) preoperative KSS predicted a good outcome at 5 years. When outcomes were assessed by absolute criteria (postoperative scores measured against OKS and PCS thresholds), a higher (better) preoperative KSS predicted a good outcome at 5 years. Body mass index, preoperative flexion range, SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) score, mechanical alignment, sex, education level, ethnicity, operative side, number of comorbidities, type of anesthesia, and type of implant were found not to be significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Asian patients with osteoarthritis had good outcomes according to the MCID criterion and benefitted from primary TKA. On the basis of our findings, we believe that older patients with a lower (worse) preoperative KSS can be informed that they have a high likelihood of improvement but a lower likelihood of achieving as good a functional outcome as those with better scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The risk of manipulation under anesthesia due to unsatisfactory knee flexion after fast-track total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Fast-track TKA has significantly shortened the time available for physiotherapists to optimize knee ROM before discharge. Safety aspects concerning knee stiffness and the need for manipulation in a fast-track setting need to be illuminated. The study aims were to analyze if fast-track TKA can be considered safe considering rates of knee manipulation and if there is an association between knee ROM at time of discharge and the need for later manipulation.

METHODS

Primary TKAs operated in 2011 at our institution were eligible for inclusion. The study group consisted of 359 TKAs.

RESULTS

Manipulation of the knee was performed in 21 of 359 TKAs (5.8%). Seventy-one percent were discharged with a flexion ≥70° combined with an extension deficit of ≤10°. The occurrence of MUA for these patients was 4.3%. The prevalence of knee manipulation showed a statistically significant association with the achieved knee flexion at discharge (p=0.02). Median length of stay was two days.

CONCLUSION

Compared with literature findings fast-track TKA surgery may be considered safe based on the acceptable rate of knee manipulations after TKA (5.8%). We suggest ROM of ≥70° flexion combined with an extension deficit of ≤10° as an "optimal-zone" for ROM at discharge. The reason for this is the low occurrence of MUA (4.3%) in relation to the large amount of TKAs it represents (71%). The indication for MUA is multifactorial and ROM at discharge serves only as an indicator of later MUA risk.

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane, and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components and their role in outcome and implant survival.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original and review articles on implant positioning following primary TKA. Definitions for coronal, sagittal, and rotational placement of femoral and tibial components were summarized and the influence of positioning on survival and functional outcome was considered.

RESULTS

Many definitions exist when evaluating placement of femoral and tibial components. Implant alignment plays a role in both survival and functional outcome following primary TKA, as component malalignment can lead to increased failure rates, maltracking, and knee pain.

INTERPRETATION

Based on currently available evidence, surgeons should aim for optimal alignment of tibial and femoral components when performing TKA.