Patellar denervation in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing and postoperative anterior knee pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Systematic lateral retinacular release does not reduce anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic lateral retinacular release (LRR) on anterior knee pain (AKP), as well as its impact on the functional and radiological outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study was designed. It included patients scheduled for a TKA procedure with patellar resurfacing, who were recruited and randomized into either the LRR group or the non-release group. 198 patients were included in the final analysis. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessed by pressure algometry (PA), the visual analogue scale (VAS), Feller's patellar score, the Knee Society Score (KSS), patellar height, and patellar tilt were recorded both preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine comparisons between both groups as well as to determine differences' intragroup.

RESULTS

Relative to the clinical variables and scores, no difference was detected between the two groups at the 1-year follow-up (p = n.s.). However, there was a slight difference in patellar tilt (0.1º vs. 1.4º, p = 0.044), with higher tilt values in the non-release group. There was no difference in terms of improvement in the clinical and radiological scores and variables recorded between the two groups (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSION

LRR in primary TKA with patellar resurfacing does not show an improvement in AKP and functional outcomes over patellar resurfacing without release.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Resection of Infrapatellar Fat Pad during Total Knee Arthroplasty Has No Impact on Postoperative Function, Pain and Sonographic Appearance of Patellar Tendon

Routine resection of the infrapatellar fat pad (IFP) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial, as it may result in shortening of the patellar tendon (PT) and anterior knee pain. This prospective study examined whether IFP excision during TKA affects joint function, anterior knee pain, PT dimensions and sonographic structure. A total of 65 consecutive patients undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis were randomized into two groups: IFP was resected in one and retained in the other. Patients were examined preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively: pain (Numerical Rating Scale-NRS), range of motion (ROM) and knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-KOOS score) were evaluated; sonographic examination determined the length, structure and vascularity of the PTs. In both groups there were postoperative improvements in NRS and KOOS scores, although IFP resection did not influence clinical outcomes or sonographic parameters. At 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively for both groups there were no differences between NRS scores (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.511 and p = 0.579), ROM scores (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.331, p = 0.180) or all KOOS subscores. IFP excision had no effect on sonographic parameters. This study suggests that IFP resection during TKA does not influence postoperative functional outcomes, pain scores, patellar tendon length and thickness, or sonographic structure.

Subchondral Bone Condition and Intraoperative Grading of Cartilage Degeneration Underneath Patella Unrelated to the Clinical Outcome after TKA with Unresurfaced Patella

The degree of cartilage degeneration assessed intraoperatively may not be sufficient as a criterion for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is useful for detecting osteoarthritic involvement deeper in the subchondral bone. The purpose of the study was to determine whether SPECT/CT reflected the cartilage lesion underneath the patella in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and whether clinical outcomes after TKA without patellar resurfacing differed according to the severity of patellofemoral (PF) OA determined by visual assessment and SPECT/CT findings. This study included 206 knees which underwent TKA. The degree of cartilage degeneration was graded intraoperatively according to the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Subjects were classified into low and high uptake groups according to the degree of bone tracer uptake (BTU) on SPECT/CT in the PF joint. The Feller's patella score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed preoperatively and postoperative 1 and 2 years. The increased BTU in the PF joint was associated with more severe degenerative cartilage changes underneath the patella (p < 0.001). The risk for the presence of denudated cartilage was greater in the high uptake group (odds ratio = 5.89). There was no association between clinical outcomes and visual grading of patellar cartilage degeneration or the degree of BTU on SPECT/CT. The visual assessment of the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella and preoperative SPECT/CT evaluation of the PF joint were not predictive of clinical outcome after TKA with unresurfaced patella.

Patellar denervation does not reduce post-operative anterior knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing

PURPOSE

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a frequent symptom after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patellar denervation (PD) has been put forth as a technique to reduce this pain; however, its effects have not been assessed in combination with patellar resurfacing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of PD on AKP and functional outcomes after TKA with patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A prospective study was designed that included patients scheduled for TKA with patellar resurfacing. The 202 recruited patients were randomized into either the PD group or the non-denervation group [mean age 72.7 years (SD 8.2); 119 (70.4%) women and 50 (29.6%) men; average body mass index 31.4 kg/m² (SD 4.9)]. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessed by pressure algometry (PA), visual analogue scale(VAS), patellofemoral Feller score and the Knee Society Scores (KSS) were recorded preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

169 patients were included in data analysis. At the 1-year follow-up, there were mild differences between denervation and non-denervation group in PPT value (494.4 kPa vs. 552.3 kPa, p = 0.047) and in VAS at stairs (2.9 vs. 1.5, p = 0.003) in favour of the non-denervation group. There was no difference in the improvement between groups in patellofemoral Feller score and KSS, but slightly higher improvement in non-denervation group in PPT (94.1 kPa vs. 160 kPa, p = 0.047), VAS walking (5.3 vs. 6.2, p = 0.041) and VAS at stairs (4.6 vs. 5.7, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Patellar denervation does not improve AKP and clinical outcomes in primary TKA with patellar resurfacing compared to patellar replacement without denervation. PD cannot be recommended when patellar replacement is performed in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Management of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial topic with no consensus.

»

Patellar management techniques during TKA include patellar retention or resurfacing with or without patellaplasty, as well as circumferential denervation and partial lateral facetectomy (PLF).

»

Special considerations such as patient age, etiology of disease, implant design, and surgeon preference should be accounted for when determining optimal management.

»

We recommend that most patellae be circumferentially denervated, regardless of whether they are resurfaced, as the potential benefits outweigh the small associated risks.

»

Evidence demonstrates improved functional outcomes with the addition of PLF to nonresurfaced patellae. There is currently a paucity of evidence of this technique with respect to resurfaced patellae.

»

Patellar resurfacing adds additional costs and health-care resources that should be considered in the decision-making process.

Influence of patellar denervation on anterior knee pain and knee function following total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reached mixed results regarding the effects of patellar denervation with electrocautery (PD) on total knee replacement (TKR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize all available literatures to investigate the influence of PD on postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP) and knee function after TKR.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase, were searched from their inception to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCT) comparing PD and non-patellar denervation (NPD) in TKR were selected, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of included trials. AKP prevalence was defined as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs and one quasi-RCT enrolled 1895 knees proved eligible. PD knees had significantly lower AKP prevalence than NPD knees (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 0.36-0.81; p = 0.003). There was no difference between PD and NPD in terms of visual analogue scale for knee pain and range of motion, American knee society knee score, American knee society function score, patellar feller score, Oxford knee score for knee function. The results of subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration and patella resurfacing were in accordance with the results. PD knees were not associated with a higher risk of complication or revision.

CONCLUSION

PD can significantly reduce the AKP prevalence following TKR without increasing the risk of complication and revision. Although the pain relief effect of PD may not be associated with improved knee function after TKR, this procedure is preferred in both patella resurfacing and patella non-resurfacing TKR.

Effectiveness of neural mobilisation combined with postural correction exercises in a patient with lateral knee pain- A case report

INTRODUCTION

Distinguishing intraarticular lesion from extraarticular lesion need a thorough clinical evaluation in case of atraumatic knee pain. The main objective of this case report was to describe about the clinical course of a patient with unrelenting symptoms with suspected lateral meniscus lesion.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 48-year old man was diagnosed with suspected lesion in the anterior horn of lateral meniscus for 9 months had received pharmacological and physiotherapy interventions. Yet the patient did not respond favourably to former symptomatic treatment. As the history and objective evaluation consistently matched with abnormal neurodynamics, in the similar line, the patient was treated with neural mobilization in a modified slump position, 15 repetitions per session for three consecutive days combined with postural correction exercises.

RESULT

The outcomes were measured with numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and knee society scale (KSS). The patient responded very well to neural mobilization combined with postural correction exercises. The NPRS (4 at rest; 7 on activity) before our intervention reduced to (0 at rest, 1 on activity) at the end of 3 rd consecutive day intervention and the KSS improved to 75 from 55 in pain score & 90 from 80 on function score. At 2-months follow-up, the patient completely recovered from pain and knee dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

This case report signifies that abnormal neurodynamics can be a factor for lateral knee pain. Neural mobilization with postural correction exercises may be recommended as an appropriate treatment for patient with lateral-knee-pain due to abnormal neurodynamics.

The Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Prosthesis: Indications for Bone Stock and Patellar Morphology

The patellar resurfacing is still a controversial and unresolved problem. The choice to use the patellar resurfacing in the total knee prosthesis (TKP) is decided by the surgeon's experience; he analyzes the thickness, the shape, consumption of the surface and he chooses the use of patellar resurfacing or to limit itself to cheiloplasty, denervation, or often to the release of the lateral wing ligament. He also assesses the metabolic state of the bone linked to Osteoporosis and the potential fragility of the joint and kneecap in particular. Bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKP) may lead to periprosthetic fractures that are associated with significant costs (morbidity, economic, etc.) and pose a challenge to operative fixation. The literature doesn't express a definitive judgment on the two options, since the results can be overlapped on average. Each option has advantages and disadvantages to be considered in the overall balance of the patellar operation. In reality, however, this technical choice requires more consolidated decision-making criteria so as to minimize the incidence of post-surgical femoral-patellar pain syndrome, the second cause of failure, which frequently leads to revision of the implant. The balance between experience and evidence can be a compromise in the choice of surgery. The experience documented in the literature must identify the parameters capable of constructing an algorithm aimed not only at the secondary resurfacing rate, but at the overall clinical evaluation. This has implications also for the rehabilitation of these patients after surgery.

Patellar Denervation with Electrocautery Reduces Anterior Knee Pain within 1 Year after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The effect of patellar denervation with electrocautery (PD) on anterior knee pain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the use of PD in TKA without patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A computerized search of published studies was performed in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases in December 2019. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes of the PD group and the non-PD group. Subgroup analyses were carried out according to the follow-up time (3, 12 months, and over 12 months) to evaluate whether the clinical effect of PD changed with time.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results showed a lower rate of AKP (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.97; P = 0.03) and a reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) for AKP (mean difference, -0.37; 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.05; P = 0.02) in the PD group when compared to the non-PD group. Subgroup analyses found the differences in AKP incidence and VAS for AKP were significant at 3- and 12-month follow-up but not after 12-month follow-up. No significant difference was observed in functional scores between the two groups. No specific complication directly or indirectly related to PD was found.

CONCLUSION

PD can decrease the incidence and severity of AKP within 12 months after TKA, but the effect cannot be maintained after 12-month follow-up. Without significant associated complication and reoperation, the use of PD is still recommended in TKA without patellar resurfacing.

Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Whether resurface the patella or not in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was controversial. In 2013, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs). After that, plenty of studies have been carried out, but there still existed a great deal of controversy. In order to update our previous study, we conducted this update meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of patellar resurfacing in TKA.

METHODS

Databases were searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in TKA. Outcomes of knee relevant indicators were analysed. To see the short- and long-term effects, we calculated the data in total and divided the patients who were followed up for ≤ 3 years and ≥ 5 years into two subgroups as well.

RESULTS

Thirty-two trials assessing 6887 knees were eligible. There was a significant difference in terms of reoperation (in total and ≥ 5 years), Knee Society Score (KSS), function score (in total and ≥ 5 years) and noise. While no significant difference was found in the following items: reoperation (≤ 3 years), anterior knee pain (AKP), function score (≤ 3 years), range of motion (ROM), Oxford score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analogue score (VAS), Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patellar resurfacing could reduce the occurrence of reoperation and noise after surgery, as well as increase the KSS and function score, while it might not influence the outcomes such as AKP, ROM, Oxford score, KOOS, VAS, Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction. The results are different from our previous finding in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, we prefer patellar resurfacing in TKA.

New treatment of patellar instability after total knee arthroplasty: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Patellar instability is an uncommon complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Partial lateral patella facetectomy (LPF) with lateral retinaculum release treatment of patellar instability is rarely reported.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case of patellar instability 8 mo after primary TKA. Treatment of this complication was adapted to address the cause of the dislocation. To eliminate patellar instability, we restored the vastus medialis and performed LPF with lateral retinaculum release. We achieved normal patellar tracking. Clinical and radiographic evaluations at the 1-year postoperative follow-up were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

LPF with lateral retinaculum release represents a promising option to restore central patellar tracking in patients with patellar instability after TKA in cases without component malposition.

Effect of Patellar Denervation on Anterior Knee Pain and Knee Function in Total Knee Arthroplasty without Patellar Resurfacing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of patellar denervation (PD) in preventing anterior knee pain (AKP) and improving knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, and to help surgeons decide whether or not to use PD in TKA.

METHODS

The electronic databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the outcomes of PD and no patellar denervation (NPD) in TKA without patellar resurfacing. Primary outcomes were incidence of AKP, visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), and patellar score (PS). Secondary outcomes were Knee Society Score (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), knee range of motion (ROM), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of nine RCT met the inclusion criteria. On meta-analysis, PD significantly reduced the incidence of AKP (odds ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 0.92), reduced the VAS (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.57; 95% CI -1.02 to -0.11), and improved the WOMAC (WMD -4.63; 95% CI -6.49 to -2.77) and the ROM (WMD 9.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 18.81) during the follow-up within 12 months. In addition, PD improved the PS (WMD 1.01; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.38), KSS (WMD 1.12; 95% CI 0.10 to 2.14), and the WOMAC (WMD -1.41; 95% CI -2.74 to -0.08) during the follow-up after 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Patellar denervation could significantly reduce the VAS and the incidence of AKP in the early stages after TKA as well as improve the clinical outcomes in terms of the PS, the WOMAC, the KSS, and the ROM. This study demonstrates that PD is a safe and recommendable technique that could be routinely performed in TKA.

Does Circumferential Patellar Denervation Result in Decreased Knee Pain and Improved Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nonresurfaced, Simultaneous Bilateral TKA?

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain, which has a prevalence of 4% to 49% after TKA, may be a cause of patient dissatisfaction after TKA. To limit the occurrence of anterior knee pain, patellar denervation with electrocautery has been proposed. However, studies have disagreed as to the efficacy of this procedure.Questions/purposes We evaluated patients undergoing bilateral, simultaneous TKA procedures without patellar resurfacing to ask: (1) Does circumferential patellar cauterization decrease anterior knee pain (Kujala score) postoperatively compared with non-cauterization of the patella? (2) Does circumferential patellar cauterization result in better functional outcomes based on patient report (VAS score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) than non-cauterization of the patella? (3) Is there any difference in the complication rate (infection, patellar maltracking, fracture, venous thromboembolism, or reoperation rate) between cauterized patellae and non-cauterized patellae?

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients (156 knees) were included in this prospective, quasi-randomized study, with each patient serving as his or her own control. Patellar cauterization was always performed on the right knee during simultaneous, bilateral TKA. Five patients (6%) were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum follow-up interval. A single surgeon performed all TKAs using the same type of implant, and osteophyte excision was performed in all patellae, which were left unresurfaced. Patellar cauterization was performed at 2 mm to 3 mm deep and approximately 5 mm circumferentially away from the patellar rim. The preoperative femorotibial angle and degree of osteoarthritis (according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system) were measured. Restoration of the patellofemoral joint was assessed using the anterior condylar ratio. Clinical outcomes, consisting of clinician-reported outcomes (ROM and Kujala score) and patient-reported outcomes (VAS pain score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 month and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperatively, the radiologic severity of osteoarthritis, based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification, was not different between the two groups, nor were the baseline pain and knee scores. The mean femorotibial angle of the two groups was also comparable: 189° ± 4.9° and 191° ± 6.3° preoperatively (p = 0.051) and 177° ± 2.9° and 178° ± 2.1° postoperatively (p = 0.751) for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively. The preoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.3 ± 0.07; p = 0.744) and postoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.2 ± 0.07; p = 0.192) anterior condylar ratios were also not different between the cauterized and non-cauterized groups.

RESULTS

At the 2-year follow-up interval, no difference was observed in the mean Kujala score (82 ± 2.9 and 83 ± 2.6 for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively; mean difference 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -0.599 to 1.202; p = 0.509). The mean VAS pain score was 3 ± 0.9 in the cauterized knee and 3 ± 0.7 in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.920). The mean ROM was 123° ± 10.8° in the cauterized knee and 123° ± 10.2° in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.783). There was no difference between cauterized and non-cauterized patellae in the mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for symptoms (86 ± 4.5 versus 86 ± 3.9; p = 0.884), pain (86 ± 3.8 versus 86 ± 3.6; p = 0.905), activities (83 ± 3.2 versus 83 ± 2.8; p = 0.967), sports (42 ± 11.3 versus 43 ± 11.4; p = 0.942), and quality of life (83 ± 4.9 versus 83 ± 4.7; p = 0.916), as well as in the Oxford knee score (40 ± 2.1 versus 41 ± 1.9; p = 0.771). Complications were uncommon and there were no differences between the groups (one deep venous thromboembolism in the cauterized group and two in the control group; odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI, 0.04-5.56; p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar cauterization results in no difference in anterior knee pain, functional outcomes, and complication rates compared with non-cauterization of the patella in patients who undergo non-resurfaced, simultaneous, bilateral, primary TKA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We do not recommend circumferential patellar cauterization in non-resurfaced patellae in patients who undergo TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

The Usefulness of Meta-Analyses to Hip and Knee Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive systematic reviews of results from homogenous or heterogeneous clinical trials, meta-analyses are used to summarize and to interpret studies. Proponents believe that their use can increase study power and improve precision results. Critics emphasize that heterogeneity between studies and bias of individual studies compromise the value of results. The methodology of meta-analyses has improved over time, utilizing statistical analysis to reduce bias and examining heterogeneity. With an increasing trend of meta-analyses in orthopaedic literature, this study aimed to investigate quality and clinical utility of meta-analyses for total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review of total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty meta-analyses in 3 major orthopaedic journals from January 2000 to August 2017 was performed. Three authors independently reviewed eligible meta-analyses. A quality assessment was conducted using the Oxman-Guyatt Index. Reporting quality was assessed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Two high-volume, fellowship-trained, attending surgeons specializing in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty independently, in a blinded fashion, reviewed 24 of the highest-scored meta-analyses.

RESULTS

There were 114 studies meeting eligibility criteria, 25 published from 2000 to 2009 and 89 published from 2010 to 2017, a 3.6-fold increase. The mean Oxman-Guyatt Index score was 3.89 points, with 12 high-quality studies, 87 moderate-quality studies, and 15 low-quality studies. The mean PRISMA score for all meta-analyses was 22.2 points, with 79% classified as low to moderate. Only 23 studies listed the Level of Evidence, and 8 were Level-I studies and 9 were Level-II studies. Studies with >15 randomized controlled trials were associated with higher PRISMA and Oxman-Guyatt Index scores. In 12 articles, we were unable to decipher the types of studies included. Only 39.4% of studies showed the risk of bias. Of the 24 studies identified as high quality per the PRISMA statement, 71% were determined to be either clinically unimportant or inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty meta-analyses has markedly increased over the past decades. The majority of published meta-analyses from 3 major orthopaedic journals were not performed in accordance with established PRISMA guidelines.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Many published meta-analyses are low to moderate quality, and clinicians should cautiously draw conclusions from poorly executed meta-analyses.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR

Background

Increasing numbers of systematic reviews (SRs) on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been published in recent years, but their quality has been unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the methodological quality of SRs on TKA and THA.

Methods

We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Databases (including HTA, DARE, and CDSR), CBM, CNKI, Wang Fang, and VIP, from January 2014 to December 2015 for THA and TKA. The quality of SRs was assessed using the modified 25-item “Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews” (mod-AMSTAR) tool, which was based on the AMSTAR scale. A T-test, nonparametric test, and linear regression were conducted to assess the relationship between bibliographical characteristics and methodological quality.

Results

Sixty-three SRs were included, from which the majority of SRs (50, 79.4%) were conducted in Asia. Only 4 reviews were rated as high quality, and most were weak in providing a priori design (6, 9.5%), not limiting the publication type (8, 13%), providing an excluded primary studies list (4, 6.3%) and reporting support for the included primary studies (1, 1.6%). Reviews published in English journals performed better than did Chinese journals in duplicate data extraction (81.3% vs 46.7%, p = 0.017; 70.8% vs 33.3%, p = 0.009) and providing source of support for the SR (87.5% vs 33.3%, P < 0.001). Reviews published in journals with a higher impact factor were associated with a higher mod-AMSTAR score (regression coefficient: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.11–0.65; P = 0.006).

Conclusion

The methodological quality of the included SRs is far from satisfactory. Authors of SRs should conform to the recommendations outlined in the mod-AMSTAR items. Areas needing improvement were providing a priori design, not limiting the publication type, providing an excluded primary studies list, and reporting conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0488-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty : Causes, diagnosis and treatment]

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain is one of the most common complications after total knee arthroplasty. An incidence of up to 30 % has been reported in peer-reviewed studies.

TARGET

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature and to identify determinants that have been analyzed with regard to anterior knee pain.

CAUSES

Patient- and knee-specific characteristics, prosthetic designs and operative techniques are addressed as well as functional and neurologic determinants. Instability, increased contact pressure in the patellofemoral joint and patella maltracking due to malrotation of components, offset errors, ligament insufficiencies or patella baja are mechanical reasons for anterior knee pain. Functional causes include pathologic gait patterns, quadriceps imbalance and dynamic valgus. They have to be differentiated from infectious and inflammatory causes as well as soft tissue impingement, arthrofibrosis and neurologic diseases.

TREATMENT

A differentiated treatment algorithm is recommended. Often conservative treatment options exist, however, particularly with most mechanical causes revision surgery is necessary.

Patellar Resurfacing Versus Circumferential Denervation of the Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study compared the rates of anterior knee pain and functional outcomes between resurfaced patellas and non-resurfaced patellas with a circumpatellar denervation. One hundred ten patients who underwent patellar resurfacing or a circumpatellar denervation were evaluated for knee pain and functional outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after total knee arthroplasty. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding Knee Society Scores, anterior knee pain scores, or visual analog scale scores. The groups had similar incidences of anterior knee pain. Most patients reported no to mild effect of anterior knee pain on daily living. Patients in each group reported increased pain with kneeling, squatting, and departing an automobile. Similar proportions of patients were disappointed with their overall outcomes in each group. Circumpatellar denervation and patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty lead to similar incidences of anterior knee pain. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e1019-e1023.].

Is patellar denervation necessary in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing?

PURPOSE

To conduct a meta-analysis with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in full text to determine the effectiveness of patellar denervation (PD) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for information from the earliest date of data collection to February 2015. RCTs comparing the benefits and risks of PD with those of no patellar denervation (NPD) in primary TKAs were included. Statistical heterogeneity was quantitatively evaluated by X(2) test with the significance set P < 0.10 or I (2) > 50 %.

RESULTS

Six RCTs consisting of 751 patients were included. The incidences of AKP in PD group and NPD group were 38.3 % (90/235) and 46.3 % (107/231), respectively. Meta-analysis showed significant prevention effect of PD on the incidence of AKP (OR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42, 1.00; P = 0.05) without significant heterogeneity (I (2) = 44 %, P = 0.15). Our results also indicated that PD was significantly associated with better American Knee Society knee (WMD = 2.50; 95 % CI 0.34, 4.67; P = 0.02) and functional scores (WMD = 4.07; 95 % CI 1.34, 6.80; P = 0.0003) and range of motion (ROM) (WMD = 4.27; 95 % CI 1.95, 6.60; P = 0.0003) compared with NPD. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups no matter in Oxford knee score, patellar score or visual analogue scale at any other time. Complications and revisions did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that PD in TKAs without patellar resurfacing, compared with NPD, could prevent the incidence of post-operative AKP and improve clinical outcome in KSS and post-operative ROM. Based on the above results, PD was a safe procedure with no significant complications and revision or re-operations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level II.

Does patellar denervation reduce post-operative anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of patellar denervation in reducing anterior knee pain and improving patient satisfaction and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. A meta-analysis was conducted to try to settle the controversy.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Of 374 papers identified, seven randomised controlled trials involving 898 patients (983 knees) were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Analysis showed that patellar denervation can significantly improve clinical outcomes for the first 12 months of follow-up after TKA, including anterior knee pain incidence (P = 0.008), visual analogue scale score (P < 0.001), patellar score (P < 0.001), Knee Society Score (P = 0.03), Knee Society Score function score (P = 0.03), and knee range of motion (P = 0.008). However, no statistical significance in outcomes was found between the patellar denervation group and no-denervation group for any of those parameters after 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The best currently available evidence suggests that patellar denervation can significantly reduce anterior knee pain incidence and improve early clinical outcomes after TKA. However, after a prolonged period of follow-up, this advantage seems to disappear. Even so, the use of patellar denervation in primary TKA is recommended because it is safe and produces good early clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level II.