Long term follow-up of successfully treated superficial wound infections following TKA

How are Oral Antibiotics Being Used in Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Review of the Literature

While the role and benefit of perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is well-established, oral antibiotic use in TJA remains a controversial topic with wide variations in practice patterns. With this review, we aimed to better educate the orthopedic surgeon on when and how oral antibiotics may be used most effectively in TJA patients, and to identify gaps in the literature that could be clarified with targeted research. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) use in high-risk primary, aseptic revision, and exchange TJA for infection may be useful in decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates. When prescribing oral antibiotics either as EOAP or for draining wounds, patient factors, type of surgery, and type of infectious organisms should be considered in order to optimally prevent and treat PJI. It is important to maintain antibiotic stewardship by administering the proper duration, dose, and type of antibiotics and by consulting infectious disease when necessary.

Methylene Blue Infiltration As a Method for Distinguishing Superficial and Deep Infections

BACKGROUND

There are no established objective methods to reliably differentiate between superficial and deep infection in the setting of total hip arthroplasty. We employed a technique of distinguishing superficial and deep infections by infiltrating methylene blue to a prosthetic hip during infection workup to determine its effectiveness and to characterize its utility in defining the joint cavity where deep debridement is required.

METHODS

An analysis was conducted on 35 patients who preoperatively received an injection of methylene blue under radiological guidance to their total hip arthroplasty. Where established periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria were not met, without signs of methylene blue beyond the deep fascia, the infection was considered superficial, and debridement remained superficial to the deep fascia. Where diagnosis of PJI was confirmed preoperatively or the presence of methylene blue in the wound cavity confirmed deep contamination, the prosthesis was addressed with methylene blue staining defining the joint cavity as a guide for debridement.

RESULTS

There were 11 patients who had no methylene blue extrusion into the superficial compartment and did not meet PJI criteria. Eight patients failed to meet PJI criteria preoperatively, but had extrusion of methylene blue, confirming a deep infection intraoperatively. There were 16 patients who met PJI criteria preoperatively with methylene blue acting as a visual guide to the joint space.

CONCLUSION

Infiltrating methylene blue in a prosthetic hip is useful in differentiating between superficial or deep infections where PJI workup is indeterminate. Where deep infection is present, its utility in defining the joint cavity may be advantageous.

Patient-related factors associated with superficial surgical site infection and progression to a periprosthetic joint infection after elective primary total joint arthroplasty: a single-centre, retrospective study in Sweden

OBJECTIVES

Superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) may increase the risk of serious complications such as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aims to identify patient-related risk factors associated with SSSI and investigate their correlation with the progression of PJI.

DESIGN

In this retrospective study, 1191 elective hip and knee prostheses were included. Patients were interviewed 3-5 months after surgery to answer questions about the postoperative period. Patient records were reviewed to determine whether there had been any documentation of wound-healing difficulties or whether antibiotics were prescribed to treat an infection related to arthroplasty surgery.

SETTING

Uppsala University Hospital, patients treated between November 2008 and December 2012.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population comprised 433 knees and 758 hips.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We studied patient-related risk factors (joint, age, sex, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes and rheumatic disease) to determine whether they were associated with (1) SSSI and (2) the progress from SSSI to PJI.

RESULTS

84 (7%) patients of the total cohort developed SSSI. This infection progressed to a PJI in 24 (29%) of the patients. Factors with increased adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for SSSIs were knee surgery (1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.7), age≥65 years (1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.8), BMI≥30 (1.9; 95% CI: 1.0 to 3.4) and ASA classification≥3 (1.7; 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.9). ASA classification≥3 was the only factor showing a significant progression from SSSI to PJI (aRR=3.3; 95% CI: 1.0 to 10.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of progressing from an SSSI to a PJI is high. Older patients, patients with obesity, and those with a high ASA classification considered for elective total knee arthroplasty seem to have an increased risk of developing SSSI. Patients with a high ASA classification seem to have an increased risk of progressing from SSSI to PJI.

Risk Factors for Wound Complications Following Conversion TKA after Tibial Plateau Fracture

INTRODUCTION

The purpose is to investigate the incidence of wound complications for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following tibial plateau open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective arthroplasty registry was queried for patients with CPT codes for primary TKA, tibial plateau ORIF, removal of hardware (ROH), and diagnosis of post-traumatic arthritis. Patients were included if they had undergone tibial plateau ORIF and subsequent TKA. Chart review was performed to obtain demographic, clinical and post-operative information.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were identified, with average age of 56.23 ± 13.2 years at time of tibial plateau ORIF and 62.91 ± 10.8 years at time of TKA. Seven (33.3%) patients had a tibial plateau fracture-related infection (FRI). Eight (38.1%) patients underwent ROH prior to TKA. Seven (33.3%) patients' TKA incision incorporated the prior plateau incisions. Eight (36.4%) patients developed wound complications following TKA and 5 (23.8%) developed an acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following TKA and had the plateau incision incorporated into the TKA incision. FRI history did not increase the rate of wound complications but did increase the rate of ROH prior to TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous FRI involving tibial plateau repair surgery doesn't correlate with PJI after conversion TKA for post traumatic OA. Surgeon-controlled factors such as staged ROH and incision placement can help reduce the rate of wound complications following TKA performed after tibial plateau ORIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00709-1.

Increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection after acute, traumatic wound dehiscence following primary total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

To describe the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and reoperation in patients who have an acute, traumatic wound dehiscence following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2018, 16,134 primary TKAs were performed at a single institution. A total of 26 patients (0.1%) had a traumatic wound dehiscence within the first 30 days. Mean age was 68 years (44 to 87), 38% (n = 10) were female, and mean BMI was 34 kg/m² (23 to 48). Median time to dehiscence was 13 days (interquartile range (IQR) 4 to 15). The dehiscence resulted from a fall in 22 patients and sudden flexion after staple removal in four. The arthrotomy was also disrupted in 58% (n = 15), including a complete extensor mechanism disruption in four knees. An irrigation and debridement with component retention (IDCR) was performed within 48 hours in 19 of 26 knees and two-thirds were discharged on antibiotic therapy. The mean follow-up was six years (2 to 15). The association of wound dehiscence and the risk of developing a PJI was analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients who sustained a traumatic wound dehiscence had a 6.5-fold increase in the risk of PJI (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 26.2; p = 0.008). With the small number of PJIs, no variables were found to be significant risk factors. However, there were no PJIs in any of the patients who were treated with IDCR and a course of antibiotics. Three knees required reoperation including one two-stage exchange for PJI, one repeat IDCR for PJI, and one revision for aseptic loosening of the tibial component.

CONCLUSION

Despite having a traumatic wound dehiscence, the risk of PJI was low, but much higher than experienced in all other TKAs during the same period. We recommend urgent IDCR and a course of postoperative antibiotics to decrease the risk of PJI. A traumatic wound dehiscence increases risk of PJI by 6.5-fold. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):191-195.

Total cost of surgical site infection in the two years following primary knee replacement surgery

Objective:

The disease burden of surgical site infection (SSI) following total knee (TKA) replacement is considerable and is expected to grow with increased demand for the procedure. Diagnosing and treating SSI utilizes both inpatient and outpatient services, and the timing of diagnosis can affect health service requirements. The purpose of this study was to estimate the health system costs of infection and to compare them across time-to-diagnosis categories.

Methods:

Administrative data from 2005–2016 were used to identify cases diagnosed with SSI up to 1 year following primary TKA. Uninfected controls were selected matched on age, sex and comorbidities. Costs and utilization were measured over the 2-year period following surgery using hospital and out-of-hospital data. Costs and utilization were compared for those diagnosed within 30, 90, 180, and 365 days. A subsample of cases and controls without comorbidities were also compared.

Results:

We identified 238 SSI cases over the study period. On average, SSI cases cost 8 times more than noninfected controls over the 2-year follow-up period (CaD$41,938 [US$29,965] vs CaD$5,158 [US$3,685]) for a net difference of CaD$36,780 (US$26,279). The case-to-control ratio for costs was lowest for those diagnosed within 30 days compared to those diagnosed later. When only patients without comorbidities were included, costs were >7 times higher.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that considerable costs result from SSI following TKA and that those costs vary depending on the time of diagnosis. A 2-year follow-up period provided a more complete estimate of cost and utilization.

Wound Complications after 2-Octyl Skin Closure Systems for Total Joint Arthroplasty

Introduction: Total joint arthroplasty is projected to expand rapidly by 2030. With large numbers of patients undergoing TJA, the choice of incisional closure has come into question. We compared the 2-Ocyl cyanoacrylate closure system of Dermabond ® Prineo ® with Exofin Fusion ® to compare rates of adverse wound outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Secondary outcome measures were age, sex, and medical comorbidities between groups.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adverse wound outcomes with skin closure in TJA in 281 patients (160 Dermabond Prineo and 121 Exofin Fusion). Clinical charts were analyzed out to the 6-week post-op visit.

Results: The rate of overall adverse superficial wound outcomes was similar between the two groups with Dermabond Prineo (N=20) and Exofin Fusion (N=19). The rate of cellulitis was significantly higher for Dermabond Prineo when compared to Exofin Fusion (P=0.033). No other significant differences were found for rate of superficial or deep wound complications or for secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: The two 2-octyl wound closure systems had similar adverse superficial wound complications. Except for Dermabond Prineo having a higher rate of post-operative cellulitis, there were no statistically significant differences for other superficial or deep adverse wound outcomes or secondary outcomes. A future randomized control trial or prospective cohort study is needed for a more robust analysis.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Wound Complication Treatment Algorithm: Current Soft Tissue Coverage Options

BACKGROUND

Wound complications associated with soft tissue defects following total knee arthroplasty present challenges for the orthopedic surgeon. The scale of early complications include less morbid problems, such as quickly resolving drainage and small superficial eschars, to persistent drainage and full-thickness tissue necrosis, which may require advanced soft tissue coverage.

METHODS

This review outlines current wound management strategies and provides an algorithm to help guide treatment and clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

A surgeon's understanding of soft tissue coverage options is essential in protecting the knee prosthesis from a deep infection and to obtain an optimal functional outcome.

A nonsurgical protocol for management of postarthroplasty wound drainage

Persistent wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty can potentiate periprosthetic joint infection. Although current recommendations are to treat persistent wound drainage with surgical debridement, we believe nonoperative treatment may be successful in selected patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of 25 persistently draining hip and knee arthroplasty wounds treated with a protocol consisting of a combination of surgical site aspiration, closure of open wound edges, cessation of anticoagulants, activity modification, and antibiotics (in select patients). Wound drainage ceased in 24 of 25 wounds treated with this protocol. One patient who continued to drain for 3 more days was successfully treated with surgical debridement and evacuation of hematoma. No patient developed infection. We believe this protocol can be successful in many arthroplasty patients.

Visible glove perforation in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The risk of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after glove perforation is not evident. This study was to identify risk factors for glove perforation in primary TKR (total knee replacement) and the risk of subsequent superficial SSI and PJI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Results of visible glove perforation of both inner and outer gloves during TKR were reviewed. A case-control analysis was performed on the preoperative and operative variables to identify predictive risk factors for glove perforation. Rate of SSI and PJI was compared between perforation and non-perforation groups, including 1226 series and 183 case-control subset.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred twenty-six primary TKR from 2011 to 2014 was reviewed. Fifty-five knees had visible glove perforations. The operation perforation rate was 4.5%. Risk factors identified were body mass index (BMI) > 30, bilateral surgery, operation time >120 min and non-trainee surgeons. Superficial SSI was significantly higher in glove perforation group (9.15 vs. 0.51% and 0.55%). PJI was not significantly different (1.82% vs. 0.60% and 1.1%). The adjusted odds ratio for superficial SSI after perforation was 15.2, independent of BMI and operation time.

CONCLUSION

Visible glove perforation in TKR is associated with several risk factors. The risk of superficial SSI is higher after perforation.

Superficial wound infection does not cause inferior clinical outcome after TKA

PURPOSE

Superficial wound infections do not lead to chronic prosthetic joint infection. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that a superficial infection of a surgical wound following a successfully treated TKA does not lead to a lower functional outcome at long-term follow-up. This may be due to early diagnosis and proper treatment without interrupting the rehabilitation programme. The purpose of this study was to support the hypothesis by comparing the functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of superficial infections treated successfully after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

In a 3000 prospective TKA cohort, 45 superficial infections were compared to a control group of 629 TKA without complications. The functional outcome, health quality, expectations and revision rate were compared between the study and control groups.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable in terms of demographic values and preoperative scores. The mean follow-up was 74.57 months (SD ± 7.1). No statistical differences were observed relative to functional outcomes at the final follow-up as measured with the Knee Society Score (156.9 vs 168.4; n.s) and range of motion (0.2-114.4 vs 0.7-112.3; n.s). For the HRQoL, no differences in the physical (40.0 vs 40.6; n.s) and mental (43.2 vs 45.8; n.s) SF-36 scores were found. Neither were there differences in post-operative expectations and the revision rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In a long-term follow-up, a different clinical outcome and HRQoL were not obtained after a successfully treated superficial infection following a TKA when compared to a TKA without complications. Based on the findings of the study, additional complications are not anticipated after a successfully treated superficial wound infection in TKA. Therefore, a different follow-up to that of a non-complicated TKA is not recommended when the early post-operative superficial wound infection has been appropriately treated. A superficial infection successfully treated in the acute post-operative period should be considered solved at long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III.