Difference in Stem Alignment Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Impact of surgical approaches on stem position and hidden blood loss in total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive vs. posterolateral

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach impacts the outcomes and recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and approaches may affect the stem positioning. Contrary to the general concept of minimally invasive surgery, the direct anterior approach (DAA) results in more intraoperative blood loss. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare stem positioning and hidden blood loss (HBL) among three surgical approaches: the minimally invasive DAA, Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen (OCM), and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA).

METHODS

A total of 201 patients undergoing their first non-cemented THA using the DAA, OCM, and PLA were included in the study. General demographic data, stem alignment, and blood loss were evaluated. Specific comparison measurements included femoral neck anteversion, femoral stem anteversion, alignment of the stem in coronal and sagittal planes, proximal and distal medullary ratios, and femoral offset. Blood loss was measured by calculating Intraoperative Blood Loss ( IBL), visible blood loss (VBL), and hidden blood loss (HBL).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, or femoral Dorr classification among the three groups. The mean surgical time was longer for the DAA and OCM compared to the PLA (P < 0.01). IBL was highest in the DAA group and lowest in the PLA (P < 0.05). Postoperative stem anteversion were significantly different among the groups, with the DAA showing the greatest anteversion difference (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the stem coronal alignment. However, there were more valgus and varus implants in the sagittal plane for the DAA and OCM. The femoral offset reduction was less optimal in the DAA and OCM groups (P < 0.05). The proximal and distal medullary ratios were lower in the DAA and OCM (P < 0.05). HBL was significantly lower in the DAA and OCM compared to the PLA (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive approaches such as DAA and OCM offer advantages in muscle and soft tissue preservation, leading to reduced HBL compared to the conventional PLA. However, these approaches present challenges in femoral stem positioning and longer surgical times.

Callus formation after total hip arthroplasty using a short tapered-wedge stem

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty using a short tapered-wedge stem is high. Callus formation preceding this fracture, which indicates postoperative stress fracture around the stem, has been reported. However, previous studies on postoperative callus are limited. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of postoperative callus after total hip arthroplasty with a short tapered-wedge stem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 127 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using a cementless short tapered-wedge stem. The depth of stem insertion was measured as the distance from the lateral corner of the stem to the most medial point of the lesser trochanter along the body axis. Postoperative callus was defined as a bridging callus on the lateral femoral cortex at the distal end of the porous coating of the stem. Plain radiography was performed before surgery and immediately and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery to assess postoperative callus. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for PC.

RESULTS

In total, 60 (47.2%) of 127 patients presented with postoperative callus. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with postoperative callus as the dependent variable revealed that the stem depth at 1 month after total hip arthroplasty (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.24, p = 0.002) was a significant and independent risk factor of postoperative callus.

CONCLUSION

Deep insertion of a short tapered-wedge stem is a risk factor for postoperative callus.

Finite element analysis of mechanical stress in a cementless tapered-wedge short stem in the varus position

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of tapered-wedge short stems has increased due to their ability to preserve bones and tendons. Surgical techniques occasionally result in a varus position of the stem, which is particularly pronounced in short stems. Although the varus position is not clinically problematic, there are reports of an increased incidence of stress shielding and cortical hypertrophy. Thus, we evaluated and examined the acceptable range of varus angles using finite element analysis.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the hip joint who had undergone arthroplasty were selected and classified into three types [champagne-flute (type A), intermediate (type B), and stovepipe (type C)]. Finite element analysis was performed using Mechanical Finder. The model was created using a Taperloc microplasty stem with the varus angle increased by 1° from 0° to 5° from the bone axis and classified into seven zones based on Gruen's zone classification under loading conditions in a one-leg standing position. The volume of interest was set, the mean equivalent stress for each zone was calculated.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in stress was observed in zone 2, and increased stress was observed in zones 3 and 4, suggesting the emergence of a distal periosteal reaction, similar to the results of previous studies. In zone 2, there was a significant decrease in stress in all groups at a varus angle ≥ 3°. In zone 3, stress increased from ≥ 3° in type B and ≥ 4° in type C. In zone 4, there was a significant increase in stress at varus angles of ≥ 2° in types A and B and at ≥ 3° in type C.

CONCLUSION

In zone 2, the varus angle at which stress shielding above Engh classification grade 3 may appear is expected to be ≥ 3°. Distal cortical hypertrophy may appear in zones 3 and 4; the narrower the medullary cavity shape, the smaller the allowable angle of internal recession, and the wider the medullary cavity shape, the wider the allowable range. Long-term follow-up is required in patients with varus angles > 3°.

A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases the rate of dislocation but increases femoral-sided complications in the way of periprosthetic fractures and component loosening. A cemented prosthesis may reduce femoral-sided complications and improve the risk:benefit profile of anterior approach THA.

METHODS

Data from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry were analysed for patients undergoing primary THA via the anterior or posterior approach using a cemented polished femoral stem from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision (CPR) for all causes and CPR for femoral component loosening and fracture. The CPR for the primary outcome measures were compared between the anterior and posterior approach and adjusted for age, sex, ASA score, BMI and femoral head size.

RESULTS

The study included 60,739 THAs with cemented stems (10,742 anterior, 49,997 posterior). The rate of revision of the anterior versus the posterior approach did not significantly differ (HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.74-1.03), p = 0.100). Anterior approach THA had a significantly higher rate of revision for femoral component loosening (HR 5.06 [95% CI, 3.08-8.30], p < 0.001); and a decreased rate of revision for infection (HR 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43-0.81], p = 0.001) and dislocation/instability (HR 0-3 months 0.48 [95% CI, 0.27-0.83], p = 0.008; HR >3 months 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15-0.61], p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of revision surgery for fracture between the 2 approaches (HR 1.01 [95% CI, 0.71-1.43]), p = 0.975).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in overall revision rates with cemented femoral fixation performed with an anterior or posterior approach. Cemented fixation performed with the anterior approach partly mitigates femoral complications with no difference in the revision rate for fracture but an increased rate of femoral component loosening.

Evaluation of the reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography planning for posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty

The anteversion of the stem is occasionally intentionally changed by the surgeon for patients with smaller femoral neck anteversion during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the reproducibility of preoperative planning with increasing anteversion has been rarely assessed. The present study investigated it using two types of stems. This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary posterolateral THA using taper-wedge (TS group; 73 hips) and anatomical (AS group; 70 hips) stems. Characteristics of sex and age were matched in the two groups by propensity score matching. In both groups, the relationship between the preoperative three-dimensional planning and postoperative stem position, and the relationship between postoperative stem position and femoral neck anteversion (FNA) were evaluated. In the TS group, there were no significant differences in average stem anteversion (SA) between preoperative planning and postoperative placement (36.1° ± 7.0° and 36.6° ± 11.1°, respectively: p = 0.651). The absolute error of SA was 8.1° ± 6.4°. In the AS group, the postoperative SA was significantly smaller than the preoperative planning SA (22.7° ± 11.6° and 30.0° ± 9.3°, respectively: p < 0.001). The absolute error of SA was 9.0° ± 5.8°. The postoperative SA was significantly larger than the FNA in the TS group (36.6° ± 11.1° and 26.3° ± 10.9°, respectively: p < 0.001). However, no significant differences between the two were observed in the AS group (23.7° ± 10.1° and 22.7° ± 11.6°, respectively: p = 0.253). The preoperative planning of intentional increasing anteversion did not show high reproducibility with taper-wedge and anatomical stems. The anatomical stem was placed according to the femoral medullary canal regardless of preoperative planning with increased SA.

Radiographic study of direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: a 10-15 year follow-up of Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains over whether different surgical approaches exert an impact on the component positioning in total hip arthroplasty. We conducted a retrospective study to reveal the long-term position of prostheses in the first group of patients in China who underwent direct anterior hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Collected were data from 350 patients who underwent direct anterior hip arthroplasty between 2008 and 2013, including demographic information, imaging data, Harris hip scores, and surgical complications. Variables, measured radiographically or by CT, included hip offset, leg length discrepancy, component position, and stability within one week after surgery and at the last follow-up. The data were subjected to statistical analysis by using paired t-tests and Pearson chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Data were harvested by follow-up and self-reported questionnaires. The postoperative follow-up lasted for 13.1 years on average (minimum, 10 years; maximum, 15 years), and the overall survival rate of hip prostheses was 96.3%. The mean Harris score at the final follow-up was 91.8 points. After excluding patients with significant preoperative hip deformities, the incidence of postoperative limb inequality (> 5 mm) was 4.9% at the last follow-up, and the incidence of hip offset discrepancy (> 5 mm) was 14.6%. The overall proportion of the acetabular components located in the Lewinnek safe zone was 77.7%, whereas the proportion of femoral prostheses in the safe zone (< 3° inclination) was 94.0%. Based on the revised data and the last follow-up imaging, the total proportion of acetabular and femoral prostheses with a radiolucence of > 2 mm was 5.1%.

CONCLUSION

Direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty could achieve excellent component positioning and long-term prosthesis survival in patients without severe hip deformities.

Analysis on association between sagittal stem alignment and early functional and radiological outcome following primary cementless total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION

Accurate reconstruction of hip anatomy and biomechanics is mandatory for achieving good clinical outcomes following total hip replacement (THR). Optimal stem alignment is essential to avoid impingement or loosening. This study aimed to evaluate sagittal stem position following cementless THR and its relationship with patient's functional outcome and post-operative radiological parameters.

METHOD

We performed analytical observational study with cross-sectional design on 71 hips (67 patients, ranged 18-85 years old) that underwent primary cementless THR in two orthopedic centers in Jakarta, Indonesia. All hips were operated through either anterolateral or posterior approach using either extended/full-coating wedge-tapered stem or proximal-coated wedge-tapered stem. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at follow-up time using mHHS questionnaire, VAS level of thigh pain, and hip ROM. Stem sagittal alignment and other radiological parameters, including combined anteversion and offset, were measured from conventional radiograph.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on mHHS score, VAS level on thigh pain, and ROM between stem alignment groups. Post-operative anteversion and offset of the implant were not affected by the stem sagittal position. All influencing factors have significant effect on sagittal stem alignment. Linear regression test on femur morphology showed 0.69° increase in stem posterior tilt for every 1° increase in the anterior bowing (coeff. = 0.502).

CONCLUSION

Stem tilting in sagittal plane did not affect patient's functional outcome or post-operative radiological parameters. In addition, for every degree of increased anterior femoral bowing, 0.69° increase in posterior stem tilting can be expected.

A New Method to Predict Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

BACKGROUND

Preoperative evaluation of femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion aids the selection of an appropriate prosthesis and optimizes the combined anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The conventional prediction methods are based on the femoral anteversion measurement at the location of the femoral head and/or neck. However, varied differences between femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion were demonstrated. This study investigated the predictive role of a new method based on the principle of sagittal three-point fixation.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2018, a total of 133 DDH hips that underwent THA were retrospectively analyzed. There were 76 Crowe type I, 27 type II, and 30 type III hips. The single-wedge stem was used in 49 hips, and the double-wedge stem was used in 84 hips. Preoperative native femoral anteversion at the femoral head-neck junction, anterior cortex anteversion at 2 levels of the lesser trochanter, posterior cortex anteversion at 5 levels of the femoral neck, and postoperative stem anteversion were measured using two-dimensional computed tomography. Predictive anteversion by the new method was calculated as the average anteversion formed by the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter and the posterior cortex at the femoral neck.

RESULTS

For hips with different neck heights, different Crowe types, different stem types, or different femoral anteversions, native femoral anteversion showed widely varied differences and correlations with stem anteversion, with differences ranging from -1.27 ± 8.33° to -13.67 ± 9.47° and correlations ranging from 0.122 (p = 0.705, no correlation) to 0.813. Predictive anteversion formed by the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter proximal base and posterior cortex 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base showed no significant difference with stem anteversion, with less varied differences (0.92 ± 7.52°) and good to excellent correlations (r = 0.826).

CONCLUSION

Adopting our new method, predictive anteversion, measured as the average anteversion of the anterior cortex at the lesser trochanter proximal base and posterior cortex 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base, predicted postoperative stem anteversion more reliably than native femoral anteversion.

A comprehensive analysis on contributing factors for varus or valgus malposition of femoral stems in uncemented total hip arthroplasty via DAA

Background

Varus or valgus malposition of uncemented femoral stems have been described to have detrimental effects for long term implant survival. Various pre- and intra-OP factors have been suggested to be relevant, one of them being the approach to the hip. The aim was to investigate several pre- and intra-OP factors associated with femoral stem malpositioning in a large series of DAA hips.

Methods

A series of 400 consecutive patients (416 hips) who underwent navigated (Brainlab) cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) in 2022 (Corail or Actis stem DePuy Synthes) via a direct anterior approach (DAA) was analyzed. Preoperative data were collected based on patients' demographics, radiographic information [critical trochanteric angle (CTA), centrum collum diaphyseal (CCD) angle, greater trochanter overhang, femoral neck resection angle, femoral neck resection height and Door classification], and these were correlated with the postoperative stem position. Univariable and multivariable linear regression were carried out to determine significant factors that contribute to varus and valgus stem malalignment.

Results

With the DAA approach, 56.5 % of stems were placed in an optimal neutral position, 38.4 % were in acceptable position of 0.1°-2° varus/valgus and only 5 % had a deviation larger than 2° varus/valgus. The critical trochanteric angle (CTA) was statistically significant in determining varus stem placement whereas centrum collum diaphyseal angle (CCD) was found to affect valgus stem malpositioning. All other factors have shown no relevant effect on stem placement using stepwise regression method.

Conclusion

In DAA, 95 % of stems were found in a varus/valgus position of 2° or less. In pre-operative measurement, only femoral morphology (e.g. CTA & CCD) were found to be relevant, affecting varus/valgus stem malposition. All other tested modifiable and non-modifiable factors had no significant effect. Therefore, pre-OP templating including measurement of CTA and CCD, intra-operative assessment as well as proper operative techniques are paramount to prevent excessive varus/valgus mal-position of femoral stem in DAA.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications Following Hip Fusion Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Efficacy, clinical outcomes, and complications following hip fusion conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery have been explored in several studies with controversial findings and no consensus.

METHODS

Comprehensive search of online databases was performed through December 2022 for prepost clinical trials using MeSH keywords. Harris hip score (HHS), leg length discrepancy (LLD), pain score, and range of motion (ROM) were considered as clinical outcomes along with implant survival and complications. The retrieved studies were assessed for methodologic quality. Weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random effects meta-analysis taking into account for heterogeneity. Subgroup meta-analysis as well as sensitivity analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Findings of meta-analysis on 34 trials showed that HHS increase after THA (WMD: 42.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 38 to 47). Subgroup analyses indicated that cementless prosthesis, length of arthrodesis <12 years, age <45 years, and studies with good quality have more HHS improvement. The LLD decreased 21 mm (95% CI: 19 to 24 mm) based on 21 trials. The range of motion (ROM) reached to 89 (95% CI: 84 to 95) for flexion, 32 (95% CI: 27 to 37) for abduction, 25 (95% CI: 21 to 29) for adduction, 29 (95% CI: 25 to 33) for external rotation, and 25 (95% CI: 20 to 31) for internal rotation after surgery. The most common complication was heterotopic ossification (14%).

CONCLUSION

Conversion of an ankylosed hip to THA leads to improved hip function and leg discrepancy with relatively notable rate of complications. Our findings could provide a framework to guide surgeons and decision makers.

Direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: influence of stem length on clinical and radiological outcomes at medium-term follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of short versus long stems implanted through a Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) on clinical and radiological outcomes in THA at medium-term follow-up (average follow-up of 44.8 months).

METHODS

167 consecutive total hip arthroplasties treating patients affected by primary hip osteoarthritis were retrospectively evaluated. A standard-length stem (H-MAXs) was used in 70 patients, while a short metaphyseal-fitting femoral stem (MINIMA) was used in 97 patients. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS) were used as outcomes measurements. Post-operatively, Engh's score and Brooker classification were analyzed at 6 months, 1 year and every 2 years until the final FU. The correct size of the implant was evaluated determining the canal fill index (CFI), and all undersized stems were classified according to Magra classification.

RESULTS

The average HHS was 83 ± 13.4 in the standard stems group and 87 ± 14.1 for short stems group (p = 0.148). The average FJS was 87.9 ± 15.2 for patients in the standard stems group and 84.5 ± 17.7 with no significant differences (p = 0.327). None of the stems showed radiographic signs of instability (standard stems mean Engh's score: 19.25 versus short stems mean Engh's score: 19.50-p = 0.41). According to Brooker classification, no significant difference in severity was found using different stems (p = 0.715). A high rate of undersized stems was found (standard stems 24%-short stems 25%) but without statistical difference between groups (p = 0.078), while a different trend in malposition following the recent classification proposed by Magra et al. was observed evaluating all undersized stems (p = 0.0387).

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups achieved good and comparable patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and radiographic stability with fixation observed by bone ingrowth. A high rate of undersized stems was found with a correlation between femoral stem length and specific pattern of malposition. Malalignment in Varus was frequent in shorter stems in contact proximally with medial calcar and distally with lateral cortex, while a uniform undersizing was observed for longer ones with a continuous margin around the stem. However, the stems never presented progressive radiolucent lines over the whole surface of the stem.

Accuracy of digital templating in uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty: which factors are associated with accuracy of preoperative planning?

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning is a fundamental step for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies have highlighted the accuracy of preoperative digital templating for estimating acetabular cup and stem size. Stem design such as single-wedge metadiaphyseal (Type 1 stem) versus mid-short stem (microplasty) and surgical approach (anterior, direct lateral or posterior) have not been well investigated as predictors of THA templating accuracy.

METHODS

204 patients (220 hips) who had undergone elective THA between November 2016 and December 2019 and presented a saved preoperative template were retrospectively reviewed. Templates from 5 different surgeons were involved in the analysis. 3 different approaches were used: direct lateral (DL), posterior (PA), direct anterior (DAA). 2 different stem designs were used: single-wedge metadiaphyseal and single-wedge mid-short (Biomet Taperloc Microplasty), while the acetabular component remained the same. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of accuracy.

RESULTS

Femoral component size templating accuracy was significantly improved when using the single-wedge mid-short stem (Taperloc Microplasty) design when performing bivariate analysis. Although accuracy of cup sizing was not affected by approach, precision was significantly better in the PA group (p < 0.05). Accuracy of templating was found to be independent of BMI and gender but dependent on presence of calibration marker and stem design (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When striving for improved templating accuracy, acetabular and femoral component accuracy were best achieved using a calibration marker and a metaphyseal short femoral stem design.

Digital templating cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty: is there a difference in planning adherence between the direct anterior approach and minimally invasive anterolateral approach?

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive approaches (MIS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) show inconsistent findings regarding planning adherence in digital templating. The purpose of this study is to evaluate any difference in planning adherence between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and an anterolateral MIS approach (AL MIS) in cementless short stem THA.

METHODS

A single surgeon series of 222 THAs in 208 patients with an uncemented short curved stem and a bi-hemispherical acetabular cup were screened for inclusion. A total of 118 THAs were implanted via the DAA and 72 THAs via the AL MIS were included. The planning adherence for the offset option, stem size and the acetabular cup were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Planning adherence for cup size (perfect match: p = 0.763; ± 1 size: p = 0.124), offset option (0.125) and stem size (perfect match: p = 0.275; ± 1 size: p = 0.552) did not show any statistical significance. Preoperative diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in AL MIS approach (OR 6.045; CI 1.153-31.696) or mild hip dysplasia in the general cohort poses (OR 11.789; CI 1.386-100.293) a significant risk for inadequate prediction of the offset option.

CONCLUSION

digital templating for THA with an uncemented short curved stem and a bi-hemispherical acetabular cup show comparable results between a direct anterior approach and a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in supine position. Surgeons should be aware of a low planning adherence for this type of short stem in minimally invasive approaches.

CONCLUSION

Digital templating for THA with an uncemented short curved stem and a bi-hemispherical acetabular cup show comparable results between a direct anterior approach and a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in supine position. Surgeons should be aware of a low planning adherence for this type of short stem in minimally invasive approaches.

The effect of patient positioning on measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur: a simulation study using computed tomographic images

The patient's position may affect the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements; however, the extent of this effect is undefined. This CT image-based simulation study quantified changes in BMD induced by hip flexion, adduction, and rotations to recommend appropriate patient positioning when acquiring dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images.

PURPOSE

Several studies have analyzed the effect of hip rotation on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, as the effects of hip flexion and abduction on BMD measurements remain uncertain, a computational simulation study using CT images was performed in this study.

METHODS

Hip CT images of 120 patients (33 men and 87 women; mean age, 82.1 ± 9.4 years) were used for analysis. Digitally reconstructed radiographs of the proximal femur region were generated from CT images to calculate the BMD of the proximal femur region. BMD at the neutral position was quantified, and the percent changes in BMD when hip internal rotation was altered from -30° to 15°, when hip flexion was altered from 0° to 30°, and when hip abduction was altered from -15° to 30° were quantified. Analyses were automatically performed with a 1° increment in each direction using computer programming.

RESULTS

The alteration of hip angles in each direction affected BMD measurements, with the largest changes found for hip flexion (maximum change of 17.7% at 30° flexion) and the smallest changes found for hip rotation (maximum change of 2.2% at 15° internal rotation). The BMD measurements increased by 0.34% for each 1° of hip abduction, and the maximum change was 12.3% at 30° abduction.

CONCLUSION

This simulation study quantified the amount of BMD change induced by altering the hip position. Based on these results, we recommend that patients be positioned carefully when acquiring DXA images.

Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Collarless Triple-Tapered Polished Cemented Stem With Line-to-Line Implantation Using a Direct Anterior Approach

BACKGROUND

The Trilliance stem (B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany), a novel collarless triple-tapered polished stem, was introduced in 2009. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological results of the Trilliance stem with line-to-line implantation in primary total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior approach.

METHODS

A consecutive retrospective series of 130 patients (151 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty between February 2009 and August 2011 were evaluated for a minimum of 10 years. Of these, 87.4% had a diagnosis of secondary osteoarthritis based on developmental hip dysplasia. Clinical and radiological results, complications were evaluated and survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 10.7 years (range, 10.0-12.1). Thirteen hips (13 patients, 6.8%) were lost to follow-up. Adequate cementation (Barrack grade A) was achieved in 136 hips (93.8%) 1 week post-operatively. Nearly all (144 hips, 99.3%) had been inserted within the range of 3°. No significant differences were identified between high- (≥30 procedures/year) and low- (<30 procedures/year) volume surgeons. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening, revision of the femoral component for any reason and revision of either component for any reason as the end points, cumulative survivorship was 100.0%, 97.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 95.4-100.0) and 96.5% (95% CI 93.8-99.3) at 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Trilliance stem with line-to-line implantation using a direct anterior approach has an excellent clinical and radiological outcome at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management-Part 1: Templating: Past, Present and Future

Hip arthroplasty is a frequently used procedure with high success rates. Its main indications are primary or secondary advanced osteoarthritis, due to acute fracture, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and hip dysplasia. The goals of HA are to reduce pain and restore normal hip biomechanics, allowing a return to the patient’s normal activities. To reach those goals, the size of implants must suit, and their positioning must meet, quality criteria, which can be determined by preoperative imaging. Moreover, mechanical complications can be influenced by implant size and position, and could be avoided by precise preoperative templating. Templating used to rely on standard radiographs, but recently the use of EOS^® imaging and CT has been growing, given the 3D approach provided by these methods. However, there is no consensus on the optimal imaging work-up, which may have an impact on the outcomes of the procedure. This article reviews the current principles of templating, the various imaging techniques used for it, as well as their advantages and drawbacks, and their expected results.

Early failure of an uncemented femoral stem, as compared to two other stems with similar design, following primary total hip arthroplasty performed with direct anterior approach

INTRODUCTION

An increased risk of early femoral component loosening has been reported using the direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with other common surgical approaches. However, long-term data are scarce. The purpose of this study is: (1) to determine the incidence of early femoral loosening in a high volume, single surgeon's practice utilising the DAA approach; and (2) to examine the effect of stem design and type of coating on aseptic loosening in the early and mid-term postoperative period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 1650 consecutive patients (1800 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the DAA between August 2011 and December 2017 was conducted at our institution. 3 types of uncemented femoral stems (Quadra-S, Avenir, TwinSys), with similar design, but different coating, were implanted. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at 4 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 46.4 months, the total incidence of revision for aseptic loosening was 0.44% (n = 8). All loose stems were Quadra-S, failing to achieve osseointegration, for an overall incidence of 0.96% (p = 0.002). None of the other stems were loose. Radiolucent lines around the proximal stem portion were visible in 75 Quadra-S stems (4.1%) on radiographs taken at 1 year postoperatively and continued to deteriorate at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this specific cohort of patients, the increased rate of femoral stem aseptic loosening was implant-related and was attributed only to a specific type of femoral stem (Quadra-S). No relation to other factors was proven suggesting that the surface characteristics of this femoral stem and the lack of bioactive coating are responsible for the observed early femoral failures. These findings should be confirmed by additional registry work and larger population sample sizes are needed to evaluate the prosthesis performance after implantation through the DAA.

Conversion of a Fused or Ankylosed Hip to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Direct Anterior Approach in the Lateral Decubitus Position an Ideal Solution?

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) is becoming increasingly popular due to its potential benefits over the posterolateral approach (PLA). However, few studies have compared the efficacies of these two surgical approaches in hip fusion treatment. This study compared early clinical direct anterior and posterolateral THA outcomes in hip fusion treatment.

Methods

Here, 127 hips (65 DAA, 62 PLA) were retrospectively evaluated. Early postoperative functional outcomes of DAA and PLA groups were assessed using Harris score and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and standard anteroposterior hip radiographs. Surgical characteristics, perioperative results, and complications within 6 months postoperatively were recorded.

Results

Though baseline values were similar, Harris and OHS scores were better in the DAA group than in the PLA group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The average cup anteversion angle was significantly greater in the DAA group than in the PLA group (12.7° vs. 11.1°). More hips undergoing DAA were successfully orientated in both inclination and anteversion angles (46 vs. 32). Early postoperative hip function predictors were preoperative fused hip position, surgical approach, and range of motion. DAA was associated with reduced postoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Furthermore, 14 vs. 8 complications occurred in the DAA vs. PLA group. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injuries were observed in eight hips (12.3%) of the DAA group.

Conclusion

For fused or ankylosed hips, THA using DAA in the lateral decubitus position may result in excellent prosthesis positioning and faster postoperative recovery throughout early follow-up vs. PLA.

The Effect of Surgical Approach and Femoral Prosthesis Type on Revision Rates Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the Most Commonly Utilized Cementless Stems

BACKGROUND

Compared with other total hip arthroplasty (THA) approaches, the anterior approach has an increased rate of revision for femoral-sided complications, and certain stems may increase this risk. The present study aimed to assess the outcome of THA by surgical approach, according to the femoral stem utilized in the procedure.

METHODS

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry were analyzed for patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis via the anterior or posterior approach with use of 1 of 5 of the most common cementless femoral stems from January 2015 to December 2019. The primary outcome measures were the cumulative percent revision (CPR) for all causes and for femoral stem loosening and fracture. The CPR was compared between THAs performed via the anterior and posterior approaches for all stems and for each individual femoral stem, as well as between individual femoral stems for each approach.

RESULTS

The study included 48,716 THAs performed with use of cementless stems, of which 22,840 utilized an anterior approach and 25,876 utilized a posterior approach. There was no difference in the all-cause CPR between the anterior and the posterior approach, but the anterior approach had a higher CPR for loosening (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.69; p < 0.001) and fracture (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.35; p < 0.001). There was apparent variation in the CPR across the different cementless stems when an anterior approach was utilized. The Quadra-H (Medacta) had a higher all-cause CPR when compared with the Polarstem (Smith & Nephew; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.91; p = 0.002) and Corail (DePuy Synthes; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.70; p = 0.0478). Variation was less apparent with the posterior approach.

CONCLUSIONS

THAs performed via the anterior approach had higher rates of revision for femoral stem loosening and fracture, with greater variation in outcomes between individual stems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acoustic characteristics of broaching procedure for post-operative stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Avoiding stem subsidence is crucial for achieving better outcome for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for the incidence of post-operative stem subsidence using full quantitative acoustic parameters in hammering sound during the broaching procedure and to assess the accuracy of this prediction model.

METHODS

The acoustic parameters of the hammering sounds during a broaching procedure for 55 hips in 49 patients who underwent THAs with cementless taper-wedged stem were analysed. The stem subsidence was assessed at one month post-operatively, and the relationship between the acoustic parameters and the value of stem subsidence was investigated.

RESULTS

The average stem subsidence was 2.15 ± 2.91 mm. The subsidence 3 mm or more was observed in eleven hips (20%), and 5 mm or more was observed in seven hips (12.7%). Basic patient's characteristics, preoperative femoral morphology and immediate post-operative canal fill ratio and stem alignment were not significantly related to the volume of stem subsidence. Nine acoustic parameters were significantly correlated with the value of subsidence. The prediction model for post-operative subsidence using only acoustic parameters during broaching procedure was established, and this model showed a positive prediction value of 100% and a negative prediction value of 90.6% for post-operative stem subsidence at 5 mm or more.

CONCLUSION

Post-operative stem subsidence can be predicted by using acoustic parameters of the hammering sound during the broaching procedure. Our results suggest that we are at the start of a new era in which novel and innovative smart technologies can be used to assist in orthopaedic surgery.

Restoring hip biomechanics during the learning curve of a novice surgeon: Direct anterior approach vs posterior approach

Introduction

It remains controversial whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) or the posterior approach (PA) allows better restoration of hip biomechanics after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Besides, it is not certain which approach is best for a novice surgeon to avoid implant malposition, neither during the learning curve nor once the curve plateau has been reached.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of THAs operated on between 2014 and 2019 by a single novice surgeon (DAA, n = 187; PA, n = 184). The surgeon used both approaches, and thus went through parallel learning curves.

Results

While the DAA presented a greater number of acetabular cup implantations within Lewinnek's "safe zone" for inclination (84.5% vs. 79.3%; p = 0.003), the PA returned superior results for anteversion (77.7% vs. 68.4%; p = 0.000). The PA showed a tendency to verticalize acetabular cups, while the DAA tended to antevert them. The DAA resulted in fewer patients with leg length discrepancy (3.2% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.041). No differences were found in stem coronal alignment or femoral offset.

Conclusion

Both approaches are safe and reliable for restoring hip biomechanics through THA surgery during the learning curve of a novice hip surgeon. Similar radiological outcomes are also seen once the surgeon has reached the learning curve plateau.

Difference in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral position in cementless total hip arthroplasty via modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach

BACKGROUND

Whether different body positions during surgery affect postoperative stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral positions in THA under the modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach.

METHODS

We reviewed 242 consecutive, primary cementless THAs performed with ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene via the modified Watson-Jones approach in either supine or lateral positions between 2009 and 2015 (supine group: 113 cases; lateral group: 129 cases). No specific reasons to select supine or lateral positions for the surgery were given during the study period. Computed tomography was performed pre- and postoperatively to measure preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion, respectively. Stem alignment in coronal and sagittal planes was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean difference in stem anteversion and femoral anteversion was 8.6 ± 9.4 in the supine position and 13.0 ± 11.4 in the lateral position (p = 0.0013). Although no significant difference was seen between groups for stem alignment in the coronal plane, flexed implantation was more likely in the supine group (46/113, 40.7%) than in the lateral group (20/129, 15.5%). A significant correlation was found between femoral anteversion and stem anteversion in both the supine and lateral groups (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.52, p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although stem anteversion was more strongly correlated with femoral anteversion in the supine position than in the lateral position, neutral position in the sagittal plane was more likely to be found with the lateral position than with the supine position. Surgeons can achieve ideal stem positioning by considering these results in the modified Watson-Jones approach in both the supine and lateral positions.

Evaluation of femoral anteversion, hip rotation, and lateral patellar tilt after total hip arthroplasty using a changeable neck system

In patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to acetabular dysplasia, femoral anteversion has many variations. A changeable neck system is one useful option to adjust the femoral anteversion. Retroverted necks can effectively adjust anatomical anteversion (AA), femoral rotational angle (FRA), and functional anteversion (FA); however, effectiveness of anteverted necks for these adjustments has not been investigated. Moreover, although the lateral patellar tilt after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to externally rotate, the influence on lateral patellar tilt using a changeable neck system remains unknown. To clarify the effectiveness of anteverted necks in THA, 96 consecutive patients (111 hips) who underwent THA using anatomical short stem with a changeable neck system were retrospectively investigated using pre- and post-operative computed tomography. Patients were divided into the straight (ST) group using straight and 4-mm-high-offset neck (N = 34) and the anteverted (AV) group using 15°-anteverted and 15°-anteverted/3-mm-high-offset neck (N = 34) after age, body mass index, and surgical approach were matched using propensity scores. AA did not change in the ST group, while it increased by 14.0° in the AV group. FRA decreased after surgery in both groups. FA decreased after surgery in the ST group, while it did not change in the AV group. Lateral patella tilt did not significantly change in both groups between pre- and post-operative position. In conclusion, with a changeable neck system, straight and anteverted necks can adjust AA to achieve pre-operative planning while not influencing lateral patellar tilt.

Use of traction table did not increase complications in total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach performed by novice surgeon

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA) performed by beginners by comparing the outcomes after the introduction of DAA-THA between using a normal operating table and a traction table.

METHODS

The total subjects were 200 patients, there were 120 cases from the introduction of three surgeons using a normal table and 80 cases from two surgeons using a traction table. The surgical procedure was standardized, and a surgeon skilled in DAA entered the operating room and instructed the novice surgeons of DAA in all cases.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.093). The difference in slope of the operative time was no significant difference between the two groups (p value = 0.089). The mean fluoroscopy time and the mean blood loss were significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The difference in slope of the fluoroscopy time and blood loss were significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). There were no intraoperative complications and no reoperations for any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

At the facility with a surgeon skilled in DAA, the use of a traction table in DAA did not increase the complication rate compared with the use of a normal operating table when the exclusion criteria for DAA were set and surgery was performed using intraoperative fluoroscopy under supervision by a skilled surgeon.

3D Printed Guides and Preoperative Planning for Uncemented Stem Anteversion Reconstruction during Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot Study

Objective

To investigate if 3D printed guides and preoperative planning can accurately control femoral stem anteversion.

Methods

A prospective comparative study was carried out from 2018 to 2020, including 53 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. The target rotation center of the femoral head is determined by three-dimensional planning. In group A, planning was made by 2D templates. In group B, preoperative 3D planning and 3D printed osteotomy/positioning guides were performed. After the operation, 3D model registration was performed to calculate the accuracy of anteversion restoration.

Results

We screened 60 patients and randomized a total of 53 to 2 parallel study arms: 30 patients to the group A (traditional operation) and 23 patients to the group B (3D preoperative planning and 3D printed guide). There were no significant differences in demographic or perioperative data between study groups. The restoration accuracy of group A was 5.42° ± 3.65° and of group B was 2.32° ± 1.89°. The number and rate of abnormal cases was 15 (50%) and 2 (8.7%), respectively. Significant statistical differences were found in angle change, restoration accuracy, and number of abnormal cases.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional preoperative planning and 3D printed guides can improve the accuracy of the restoration of femoral anteversion during hip arthroplasty.

Minimum 10 years clinical results of an anatomical short stem with a proximal hydroxyapatite coating

OBJECTIVES

The CentPillar stem (Stryker Orthopaedics), an anatomical short stem, was designed to match the proximal femoral canal shape in both patients with normal hips and those with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The long-term outcomes of the CentPillar stem was examined herein.

METHODS

In total, 222 hips that underwent total hip arthroplasty using the CentPillar stem were analyzed. DDH was the main reason for surgery (79.3%). Implant survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. For radiographic evaluation, stress shielding was assessed using the Engh classification. For functional evaluation, patients' ability to perform deep hip bending activities (sit on the floor, squat, and sit straight) was assessed.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 13.1 years, 2 stem revisions were performed (aseptic loosening and late hematogenous periprosthetic infection), and the overall cumulative implant survival rate was 99.0% at 15 years. In the radiographic evaluation, grade >3 stress shielding was found in only one hip. More than 80% of the patients were able to perform each of the three deep hip bending activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Good fixation at the proximal part of the femur was obtained, and the implant survival rate of the CentPillar stem was excellent during a long-term follow-up.

A Surgeon's handedness in direct anterior approach-hip replacement

BACKGROUND

The impact of handedness on clinical outcomes was easily overlooked in hip replacement. This study aimed to find whether the component positioning and hip function were affected by the handedness in total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA).

METHODS

Total 102 patients who underwent bilateral DAA-THAs simultaneously between May 2016 and November 2018 in our institute were reviewed. All surgeries were operated by one right-handed surgeon. Their demographic, cup positioning, stem alignment, femoral stem fit, Harris hip score (HHS), intraoperative and postoperative complications were used to evaluate the role of handedness in DAA.

RESULTS

The inclination of left cups was significantly larger than that of right cups (42.61 ± 7.32 vs 39.42 ± 7.19, p = 0.000). The stem fit of left femur was significantly larger than that of right femur (84.34 ± 4.83 vs 82.81 ± 6.07, p = 0.043). No significant differences in safe zone ratio, HHS and complications between bilateral hips were found.

CONCLUSIONS

A surgeon's handedness had significant impact on cup's inclination and femoral stem fit in DAA-THA. However, there were no significant differences of cup malpositioning, stem alignment, hip function scores and complications between bilateral DAA-THAs.

An increase in the risk of excessive femoral anteversion for relatively younger age and types of femoral morphology in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach

BACKGROUND

Direct anterior approach (DAA) is known to diminish a dislocation risk and widely used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). On the other hand, anterior dislocation due to increasing stem anteversion and cup anteversion is an important complication.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 140 (male/female: 10/130) consecutive patients with 149 hips who had undergone primary THA in the period between 2011 and 2015 was conducted. Factors including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and primary diagnosis were examined. Radiographic parameters including the Dorr proximal femoral types, cortical thickness index (CTI), canal flare index (CFI), and canal to calcar index were measured. To investigate relationships of combined anteversion (CA) with other factors, a stepwise regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The mean age, BMI, and the follow-up period were 69.5 ± 10.3 years old, 23.4 ± 3.4 kg/m², and 48.2 ± 13.6 months, respectively. The proximal femurs of the 149 hips were categorized as Dorr type A ( n = 33), type B ( n = 110), and type C ( n = 6). The mean CTI, CFI, and canal to calcar index were 0.56 ± 0.08, 4.15 ± 0.83, and 0.46 ± 0.09, respectively. The mean stem varus angle, radiographic inclination, and radiographic anteversion of the cup were 0.19 ± 1.63, 40.9 ± 6.0°, and 12.7 ± 3.5°, respectively. Stem anteversion measured by computed tomography (CT) axial image was 17.7 ± 12.0°. The mean radiographic inclination, radiographic anteversion (CTRA), and anatomical anteversion analyzed by Kyocera 3-D template were 40.8 ± 7.2°, 19.8 ± 6.6°, and 28.8 ± 10.0°, respectively. Mean CA defined as the sum of stem anteversion and CTRA was 37.5 ± 14.5°. To investigate relationships of CA with other factors, a stepwise regression analysis was performed and resulted in a model with age ( p < 0.001). In the same way, stem anteversion and CTRA were analyzed; only for the stem anteversion, the stepwise selection process resulted in a model with age ( p < 0.001) and the Dorr types ( p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The risk of excessive femoral anteversion increases for relatively younger age and for types of femoral morphology according to the Dorr classification, moreover with an increase of CA in DAA-THA with cementless tapered-wedge stem.

Optimal Level of Femoral Neck for Predicting Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type I Dysplastic Hip

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the optimal level of femoral neck for measuring femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion in Crowe type I developmental dysplasia of the hip.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 108 Crowe type I hips that underwent THA between January 2016 and December 2017, including 70 women and 19 men with a mean age of 63.08 ± 9.13 (range, 41-83) years. The single-wedge stem was used in 37 hips, the double-wedge stem was used in 71 hips. Computed tomography scans were performed pre- and post-operation. Femoral anteversion at six levels of the proximal femur were measured via preoperative two-dimensional computed tomography. Femoral anteversion at the level of the femoral neck osteotomy plane and postoperative stem anteversion were measured via three-dimensional reconstructed models.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 18.5 months (range, 12-27). The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 51.5 ± 8.7 and improved to 90.4 ± 7.8 (P < 0.001) by the last follow-up. There were no intraoperative fractures, and no infections occurred during the follow-up period. Two patients developed deep venous thrombosis. There was no sign of prosthetic loosening in all hips. No significant correlations were found between the height of the femoral neck osteotomy plane and postoperative stem anteversion (r = -0.119, P = 0.220). Femoral anteversion decreased gradually from 64.00° ± 10.51° at the center of lesser trochanter to 15.21° ± 13.31° at the head-neck junction, which was changed from more to less than stem anteversion (24.37° ± 13.86°). The femoral anteversion at femoral head-neck junction (15.21° ± 13.31°) was significantly less than postoperative stem anteversion (P = 0.000), with a difference of -9.16° ± 9.27°. The femoral anteversion at the level of the osteotomy plane (28.48° ± 15.34°) was significantly more than the postoperative stem anteversion (P = 0.000), with a difference of 4.11° ± 9.56°. Among all six levels and the level of osteotomy, femoral anteversion at the 10-mm level above the proximal base of lesser trochanter (22.65 ± 12.92) displayed the smallest difference (-1.72° ± 8.90°) and a good correlation (r = 0.764) with postoperative stem anteversion for all 108 hips, with a moderate correlation of 0.465 for single-wedge stem hips and an excellent correlation of 0.821 for double-wedge stem hips.

CONCLUSION

For Crowe type I hips, femoral anteversion would be different if it was measured via different levels of the femoral neck. The 10-mm level above the proximal base of the lesser trochanter could be an optimum choice for measuring femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion.

Direct anterior approach in lateral position achieves superior cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a radiological comparative study of two consecutive series

INTRODUCTION

Although the advantages of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) have been well documented, DAA in the supine position is limited by the difficulty in exposing the acetabulum and femur, which may result in implant malpositioning and intra-operative complications. Recent studies have reported that DAA-THA in the lateral position can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in implant alignment between two patient cohorts that underwent primary THA by DAA and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) in the lateral position.

METHODS

A total of 208 THAs (110 using DAA and 98 using PLA) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The cup anteversion angle was closer to the target anteversion angle, and the accuracy of cup orientation was superior in the DAA group. A total of 82 (74.5%) DAA-THA and 56 (57.1%) PLA-THA cases showed successful inclination and anteversion angles (p = 0.008) of the implant. In addition, 90 (81.8%) DAA-THA and 67 (68.4%) PLA-THA cases had successful anteversion angle (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of successful inclination angle (98 vs. 81, p = 0.181), as well as in the stem alignment in both coronal and sagittal planes.

CONCLUSION

THA using DAA in the lateral position can achieve superior cup orientation compared to PLA while maintaining the stem alignment.

Prediction of Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Crowe Type II/III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip on Preoperative Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning is fundamental for total hip arthroplasty. This study investigated the optimal femoral neck level for measuring femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip and determined the predictive role of average anteversion based on the sagittal 3-point fixation.

METHODS

Sixty-two Crowe type II/III dysplastic hips that underwent total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative anteversion was measured via 2-dimensional computed tomography. Anterior and posterior cortex anteversions were measured at 6 levels of the proximal femur. Femoral anteversion at each level was calculated. Average anterior (lesser trochanter) and posterior cortex anteversions (femoral neck) were calculated based on the sagittal 3-point fixation.

RESULTS

From the lesser trochanter to head-neck junction, femoral anteversion decreased gradually from more to less than stem anteversion. For hips with femoral neck height ≥10 mm, femoral anteversion at the 10-mm level above the lesser trochanter proximal base showed no significant difference with stem anteversion, with a good correlation for the single-wedge and an excellent correlation for the double-wedge stem. Average anterior (lesser trochanter proximal base) and posterior cortex anteversions (femoral neck at 10 mm above the lesser trochanter proximal base) showed no significant difference from stem anteversion, with excellent correlations.

CONCLUSION

For Crowe type II/III hips with femoral neck height ≥10 mm, the 10-mm level above the lesser trochanter proximal base is an optimal choice for measuring femoral anteversion to predict postoperative stem anteversion. The average of anterior cortex anteversion at the lesser trochanter and posterior cortex anteversion at the femoral neck has a predictive role.

Variation in greater trochanteric lateroversion: a risk factor for femoral stem varus in total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Correct implant positioning is required to achieve adequate biomechanics. The greater trochanter is more medially or laterally positioned in some patients, known as trochanteric lateroversion. However, studies have not identified correlations between postoperative coronal alignment and variation in greater trochanteric lateroversion. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of variation in greater trochanteric lateroversion on postoperative stem coronal alignment and to investigate other factors related to stem coronal alignment.

METHODS

A total of 213 hips in 149 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty were included in this prospective study. The greater trochanters were categorised into 5 groups according to the degree of variation in greater trochanteric lateroversion, and the stem coronal alignment angle and stem fit were measured on anteroposterior radiographs.

RESULTS

Postoperative stem varus was positively correlated with greater trochanteric lateroversion (r = 0.26065, p = 0.0001) and negatively correlated with the stem fit (r = -0.16568, p = 0.0155).

DISCUSSION

Excessive variation in greater trochanteric lateroversion was a risk factor for femoral stem varus, and the stem varus position was always accompanied by inadequate canal filling. When the tip of the trochanteric overhang exceeded the centreline of the femoral canal, the influence of lateroversion of the greater trochanter on the femoral stem remarkably increased. Appropriate measures should be implemented to avoid a stem varus position and inappropriate stem fit.

Comparative study of stem anteversion using a cementless tapered wedge stem in dysplastic hips between the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches

BACKGROUND

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the concept of combined anteversion is accepted as one of best indicators of prosthetic joint stability. Technical parameters may influence the stem and cup anteversion. We therefore investigated if stem anteversion could be influenced by surgical approaches in cementless THA using a tapered wedge stem with stem-first technique.

HYPOTHESIS

We postulated that the type of approach, posterolateral (PLA) or anterolateral approach (ALA), would influence stem anteversion in dysplastic hip patients. We asked (1) whether stem anteversion was higher in the PLA group and (2) how postoperative stem anteversion was correlated to preoperative femoral anteversion in each group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared two groups of hips that underwent THA using a tapered wedge stem with the posterolateral (PLA group; 154 hips) or anterolateral (ALA group; 81 hips) approaches. Computed tomography was utilized to measure femoral neck and stem anteversion. To investigate related factors that affect stem anteversion, a stepwise regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The stem anteversion in the PLA and ALA groups was 43.7°±9.8° and 34.0°±12.3°, respectively (p<0.01). The stepwise selection process resulted in a model involving femoral neck anteversion and surgical approach (p<0.01). The stem anteversion of the ALA group (r=0.75, p<0.01) was better correlated to femoral neck anteversion than that of the PLA group (r=0.52, p<0.01).

DISCUSSION

The stem implantation through the ALA is thought to be more restricted than that through the PLA due to the difference of difficulty in femoral exposure. Tapered wedge stems, which are relatively thin and flat, have a high degree of freedom in the femoral canal. Consequently, in cementless THA using a tapered wedge stem, the surgical approaches affected stem anteversion differently. Stem anteversion was more anatomically restored to femoral neck anteversion through the ALA than through the PLA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective case-control study.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Bikini Incision Can Be Safely Performed in Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

Direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty can be performed through a traditional vertical incision or a horizontal (bikini) incision. The purpose of this study is to compare the 2 approaches, performed by a single surgeon past the learning curve, in terms of (1) overall wound complications and (2) patient-reported esthetics at the 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

A case-control retrospective study was conducted. Eighty-six bikini DAA patients were matched 3:1 to 230 conventional DAA patients for gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Outcomes evaluated included wound complications, acute periprosthetic joint infection, transfusion, length of surgery, and dysesthesia. A subgroup analysis was also performed on obese patients, BMI greater than 30 kg/m². Furthermore, the patients rated cosmesis of the incision at 6 months using a Patient Scar Assessment Scale and the Vancouver Scar Assessment Scale.

RESULTS

Bikini patients had lower rates of delayed wound healing compared to conventional incision (2.3% vs 6.1%, P = .087). This difference was statistically significant (0% vs 16.6%, P < .05) in obese patients. There was no difference in terms of incision cosmesis between the 2 incision types.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the DAA total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely through an alternative horizontal bikini incision with complication rates equivalent to conventional incision DAA and to those in other approaches when performed by surgeons in a high volume, efficient hip replacement institution. In patients whose BMI is >30, a potential benefit of the horizontal incision may be lower wound complications. This study design should be performed at other institutions and ideally at a multi-institution level to evaluate if results can be corroborated. Our opinion is that the horizontal bikini incision should be utilized but only after mastery of the DAA approach using the conventional vertical incision.

Adopting the direct anterior approach: experience and learning curve in a Chinese patient population

Background

There are concerns regarding the complications encountered during the learning curve when switching to a direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study is to report our outcomes and complications after adopting a new approach in a Chinese patient population.

Methods

From 2016 to 2018, a single surgeon’s first 100 cases with unilateral DAA for THA were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the first 50 cases were designated as group A and the second 50 cases were designated as group B. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data were analyzed. The cumulative summation method (CUSUM) was used to determine the learning curve.

Results

There was a significant decrease in the complication rate from 44% in the first 50 cases to 16% in the second 50. The first 50 cases showed a significant increase in operating time, length of hospitalization, fluoroscopy, and complications. There was no significant difference in implant position, postoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD), Harris score, or creatine kinase. CUSUM analysis showed that complication rates and operating time reached acceptable and steady state after 88 cases and 72 cases respectively.

Conclusions

Adopting DAA in a Chinese patient population has its own unique considerations and challenges. Even in the hands of an experienced surgeon, DAA is still a technically demanding procedure.

Does patient-reported perception of pain differ based on surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty?

Aims

Whether patient-reported pain differs among surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. This study’s purposes were to determine differences in pain based on surgical approach (direct anterior (DA) vs posterolateral (PL)) and PL approach incision length.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective investigation from two centres and seven surgeons (three DA, three PL, one both) of primary THAs. PL patients were categorized for incision length (6 cm to 8 cm, 8 cm to 12 cm, 12 cm to 15 cm). All patients had cementless femoral and acetabular fixation, at least one year’s follow-up, and well-fixed components. Patients completed a pain-drawing questionnaire identifying the location and intensity of pain on an anatomical diagram. Power analysis indicated 800 patients in each cohort for adequate power to detect a 4% difference in pain (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.80).

Results

A total of 1848 patients (982 DA, 866 PL) were included. PL patients were younger (59.4 years, sd 12.9 vs 62.7 years, sd 9.7; p < 0.001) and had shorter follow-up (3.3 years, sd 1.3 vs 3.7 years, sd 1.3; p < 0.001). DA patients reported decreased moderate to severe trochanteric (14% vs 21%; p < 0.001) and groin pain (19% vs 24%; p = 0.004) than PL patients. There were no differences in anterior, lateral, or posterior thigh, back, or buttock pain between cohorts (p = 0.05 to 0.7). PL approach incision length did not impact the incidence or severity of pain (p = 0.3 to 0.7).

Conclusion

A significant proportion of patients perceive persistent pain following THA regardless of approach. DA patients reported less trochanteric and groin pain versus PL patients. PL incision length did not influence the incidence or severity of patient-reported pain. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):31–36.

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Morphometrically Optimized Femoral Stem, a Conventional Operating Table, Without Fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Our experience with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA) suggests that it can be performed successfully with a morphometrically optimized metaphyseal-diaphyseal engaging femoral stem (NOT a short stem), a regular operating room table (NOT a special custom table), and WITHOUT intraoperative fluoroscopy. We report our minimum 2-year results.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single-surgeon series of primary direct anterior approach THAs was performed. All procedures were performed on a regular table, without fluoroscopy, using a cementless tapered femoral stem. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years.

RESULTS

In total, 1017 primary THAs were performed. The preoperative Harris Hip Score was 40.7 ± 5.1 and improved to 95.3 ± 4.2 at minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 3 dislocations (0.3%) and 15 revisions (1.5%): 7 for infection (0.7%), 4 for periprosthetic fractures (0.4%), 2 for instability (0.2%), 1 for loosening (0.1%), and 1 for pain (0.1%). Five patients (0.5%) required blood transfusion. One patient developed deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. No intraoperative fractures, perforation, or THA-related mortality occurred. Neutral stem alignment was confirmed in 98.3%. Mean cup inclination was 38.8° ± 5.1° and anteversion was 16.2° ± 3.5°. The mean leg-length discrepancy was corrected from 1.2 ± 0.2 cm preoperatively to 0.2 ± 0.1 cm postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Using a morphometrically optimized metaphyseal-diaphyseal engaging tapered femoral stem instead of a short stem reduces component malposition and minimizes risk of loosening. Combining the use of this implant design and the technique and elements described in our cohort demonstrated to have excellent results at 2 years. The patients will need continued follow-up to demonstrate further durability of this device and technique compared to others performing direct anterior THA.

The effect of flexion alignment in total hip arthroplasty with a cementless tapered-wedge femoral stem

INTRODUCTION

The influence of stem sagittal alignment on clinical outcomes is unclear in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between stem sagittal alignment and clinical and radiographic outcomes using 3D-CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed 370 consecutive primary THAs between 2009 and 2013. After exclusion, 102 hips in 89 patients using single tapered-wedge stem were included. Mean follow-up was 4.7 years. Stem sagittal alignment was measured using CT, and patients were divided into flexion and neutral alignment groups. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between two groups. Furthermore, we evaluated the anterior femoral offset and initial contact state.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical or radiographic outcomes between two groups. CT data analysis and multiple regression analysis showed flexion alignment increased anterior femoral offset (AFO) and Gruen zone 4 contact area.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between flexion and neutral alignment of the tapered-wedge stem at an average of 4.7 years of follow-up. The increase of AFO and distal contact area in flexion alignment could affect the improvement of impingement-free range of flexion and intraoperative fracture.

Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?

BACKGROUND

Some studies have revealed an increased risk of early aseptic loosening of cementless stems in THA when inserted through an anterior or anterolateral approach compared with a posterior approach, whereas approach does not appear to be a risk factor in others. Stem design, whether "anatomic" (that is, stems with a curved lateral profile or an obtuse angle at the proximal-lateral portion of the stem) or "shoulder" (that is, straight with a proximal shoulder), may also be associated with a differential risk of aseptic loosening in cementless THA depending on the surgical approach used, but if so, this risk is not well characterized.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this national registry study, we investigated the association between surgical approach and early aseptic loosening of (1) cementless femoral stems with a proximal angular shape (shoulder); and (2) anatomically shaped femoral stems.

METHODS

The Dutch Arthroplasty Registry is a nationwide population-based register recording data on primary and revision hip arthroplasty. We selected all primary THAs (n = 63,354) with a cementless femoral stem inserted through an anterior, anterolateral, or posterior approach from 2007 to 2013 with a minimal followup of 2 years. Femoral stems were classified as "anatomic," "shoulder," or "other" (that is, not classifiable as anatomic or shoulder). From the 47,372 THAs with an anatomic or shoulder stem (mean followup, 3.5 years; SD, 1.8 years), 340 (0.7%) underwent revision surgery as a result of aseptic loosening of the femoral stem, 1195 (2.5%) were revised for other reasons, and 1558 patients (3.3%) died. We used Cox proportional hazard models to determine hazard ratios for aseptic loosening of anatomic and shoulder stems for the anterolateral and anterior approaches compared with the posterior approach.

RESULTS

After controlling for relevant confounding variables such as sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous surgery, and coating and material of the femoral stem, we found that there was a stem-approach interaction. Separate analysis showed that shoulder stems had a greater likelihood of early aseptic loosening when the anterolateral approach (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-3.63; p < 0.001) or anterior approach (HR, 10.47; 95% CI, 2.55-43.10; p = 0.001) was used compared with the posterior approach. Separate analysis of the anatomic stems yielded no association with approach (anterolateral: HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.70-1.63, p = 0.77; anterior: HR, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.91-1.89, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

In THA, cementless femoral stems with a proximal shoulder are associated with early aseptic loosening when inserted through an anterior or anterolateral approach compared with a posterior approach. An anatomically shaped stem may be preferred with these approaches, although further analysis with larger registry volumes should confirm our results, in particular for shouldered stems when implanted through an anterior approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Safely transitioning to the direct anterior from posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Purpose

We compare the complication rate in transition to direct anterior (DAA) from posterior approach (PA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort single-surgeon study of consecutive primary THAs over a transition period from PA to DAA.

Results

There were no significant differences in dislocation rate, femoral fracture, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury or success rate in cup inclination and anteversion angle between two groups.

Conclusion

We conclude that this single-surgeon study demonstrates the safely transitioning to DAA from PA in THA with no significant increase in complications in a selected patients.

Perioperative Comparison of Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior Approach with the Posterolateral Approach

Purpose

The aim of the current study is to report the advantage and disadvantage of total hip arthroplasty performed in direct anterior approach (DAA) by comparing it to the posterolateral approach (PLA).

Materials and Methods

Twenty-five hip arthroplasty done in DAA (12 total hip arthroplasty [THA] and 13 bipolar hemiarthroplasty [BHA]) were compared with the same number done in PLA (13 THA and 12 BHA). Intraoperative assessments including operation time, anesthetic time, bleeding amount were recorded with intraoperative complications. Immediate postoperatively, position of the prosthesis and leg length discrepancy were measured and were compared between the two approaches.

Results

The operation time was 22 minutes and 19 minutes longer in DAA for THA and BHA respectively while the anesthetic time difference was 26 and 10 respectively. However, these parameters showed no statistical difference. No significance was found when bleeding amount was compared. For DAA, cup alignment was within safe zone in 100% both for inclination and for anteversion while this was 83.3% and 75.0% respectively in PLA. Leg length difference was 3 mm in DAA and 5 mm in PLA but had no significant difference. Tensor fascia lata tear was the most common complication occurring in 9 patients.

Conclusion

Although significant was not reached there was trend toward more operation time and anesthetic time when DAA was used. However, the trend also showed that cup and stem were likely to be in more accurate position and in adequate size which is likely due to the accurate use of fluoroscopy.

The Accuracy of Digital Templating for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches?

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) has gained recent popularity for total hip arthroplasty (THA), as it provides immediate feedback on cup position and limb length using fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate any differences in the accuracy of digital templating for preoperative planning of THA, performed with 2 different surgical approaches: DAA using a radiolucent table with intraoperative fluoroscopy and the posterior approach (PA).

METHODS

One hundred thirty-one consecutive patients (148 hips) underwent a THA by a single surgeon, using the same cup and stem designs. Seventy-five hips were performed using the DAA using a fracture table and fluoroscopy. Seventy-three hips were performed using the PA with the patient positioned in lateral decubitus using standard positioners without fluoroscopy. Preoperative radiographs were digitally templated by the same surgeon.

RESULTS

The PA patients had a higher mean body mass index and were more likely to have a preoperative diagnosis of avascular necrosis. The accuracy of templating for predicting the cup size to be within 2 mm was 91% for DAA vs 88% for PA (P = .61). For stem size, the accuracy was 85% (to within 1 size) for the DAA vs 77% for the PA (P = .71). Likewise, there was no significant difference in predicting the final stem's neck angle or femoral offset.

CONCLUSION

Digital templating was found to be a reliable and highly accurate method for predicting component sizes and offset for THA, regardless of using either the PA or the DAA with fluoroscopy.

Validation of patient-specific surgical guides for femoral neck cutting in total hip arthroplasty through the anterolateral approach

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to validate the effectiveness of neck-cut patient-specific surgical guides (PSGs) for femoral component implantation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) through the anterolateral approach compared with that without PSG.

METHODS

A total of 32 fresh cadaveric hips were included. Anatomical stem implantation with wide-base-contact PSG (AWP group) and without PSG (control group) were compared. The absolute errors between preoperative planning and PSG setting (E1), as well as those between preoperative planning and postoperative component implantation (E2) were evaluated using CT.

RESULTS

The E1/E2 values of AWP were 0.9±0.3°/0.6±0.6° in the coronal plane, and 1.7±0.8°/1.0±0.9° in the sagittal plane, and 1.0±0.6 mm/1.0±1.1 mm for the medial height. The E2 value in the sagittal plane (P=0.037) and the medial height (P=0.011) of AWP were significantly smaller than those of control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The neck-cut PSG through the anterolateral approach is effective for femoral component implantation.

Cementless Hip Stem Anteversion in the Dysplastic Hip: A Comparison of Tapered Wedge vs Metaphyseal Filling

BACKGROUND

Appropriate stem anteversion is important for achieving stability of the prosthetic joint in total hip arthroplasty. Anteversion of a cementless femoral stem is affected by the femoral canal morphology and varies according to stem geometry. We investigated the difference and variation of the increase in anteversion between 2 types of cementless stems, and the correlation between each stem and the preoperative femoral anteversion.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 2 groups of hips that underwent total hip arthroplasty using a metaphyseal filling stem (78 hips) or a tapered wedge stem (83 hips). All the patients had osteoarthritis due to hip dysplasia. Computed tomography was used to measure preoperative femoral anteversion at 5 levels and postoperative stem anteversion.

RESULTS

The increase in anteversion of the tapered wedge stem group (22.7° ± 11.6°) was more than that of the metaphyseal filling stem group (17.2° ± 8.3°; P = .0007). The variation of the increase in the tapered wedge stem group was significantly larger than that in the metaphyseal filling stem group (P = .0016). The metaphyseal filling stem group was more highly and positively correlated with femoral anteversion than the tapered wedge stem group.

CONCLUSION

Femoral anteversion affects stem anteversion differently according to stem geometry. The tapered wedge stems had greater variation of the increase in anteversion than did the metaphyseal filling stems. Based on the results of this study, it is difficult to preoperatively estimate the increase in stem anteversion for tapered wedge stems.

Patient Perceptions of the Direct Anterior Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The quest for less invasive surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has garnered much attention recently in the community, as well as media outlets. There are very little data demonstrating the actual differences in these approaches. We are unaware of any information documenting patients' perceptions of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA. The purpose of this study was to collect information regarding patients' perceptions of the DAA THA.

METHODS

We surveyed 166 consecutive new patients being evaluated for hip osteoarthritis in our outpatient clinic. Demographic data and their knowledge of the DAA were collected, as well as a number of questions on a 5-item Likert scale.

RESULTS

Forty-six (28%) responded that they were aware of the DAA. Respondents primarily learned about the DAA from friends and family (58%), and healthcare professionals (38%). Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the DAA is less painful (70%), reduces the amount of time spent on a cane after surgery (70%), damages tissues less (68%), allows patients to more quickly return to work (64%), and allows for shorter hospital stays (62%), compared to other procedures. In addition, 30% felt there is a consensus among surgeons that the DAA is the safest and most effective procedure for THA.

CONCLUSION

Many people are unaware of the DAA, with a majority of healthcare information being transmitted by friends and family members. The patients' perceptions are inconsistent with published data about the DAA and are likely influenced by marketing and individuals surrounding them.

The Direct Anterior Approach is Associated With Early Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has generated increased interest recently. The purpose of this study was to compare the duration to failure and reasons for revision of primary THA performed elsewhere and subsequently revised at our institution after the direct anterior vs other nonanterior surgical approaches to the hip.

METHODS

All primary THAs performed elsewhere and referred to our institution for revision were divided into the direct anterior approach (30 cases) or nonanterior approach groups (100 cases, randomly selected from 453 cases) based on the original surgical approach. Because all primary direct anterior THAs were originally performed after 2004 to eliminate temporal bias, we identified a subset of the nonanterior group in which the primary THA was performed after 2004 (known as the recent nonanterior group, 100 cases, randomly selected from 169 available cases).

RESULTS

The mean duration from primary to revision THA was 3.0 ± 2.7 years (direct anterior approach), 12.0 ± 8.8 years (nonanterior approach), and 3.6 ± 2.8 years (recent nonanterior), respectively. There was a significant difference in time to revision between the direct anterior and nonanterior approach groups (P < .001). Aseptic loosening of the stem was significantly more frequent with the direct anterior approach group (9/30, 30.0%) when compared with the nonanterior group (8/100, 8.0%, P = .007) and the recent nonanterior group (7/100, 7.0%, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening is more commonly associated with the direct anterior approach in our referral practice.

Direct Anterior Approach: Risk Factor for Early Femoral Failure of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is marketed with claims of superiority over other approaches. Femoral exposure can be technically challenging and potentially lead to early failure. We examined whether surgical approach is associated with early THA failure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 478 consecutive early revision THAs performed within 5 years after the primary THAs at 3 academic centers from 2011 through 2014 was carried out. Exclusion criteria resulted in a final analysis sample of 342 early-failure THAs. The surgical approach of the primary operation that was revised, the time to the revision, and the etiology of the failure leading to the revision were documented.

RESULTS

Analysis of the revisions due to early femoral failure showed them to be more common in patients who had undergone the direct anterior approach (57/112; 50.9%) than in those treated with the direct lateral (39/112; 34.8%) or the posterior (16/112; 14.3%) approach (p = 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis controlling for age, sex, laterality, Dorr bone type, body mass index (BMI) at revision, bilateral procedure (yes/no), and femoral stem type, the direct anterior approach remained a significant predictor of early femoral failure (p = 0.007). The majority of early revisions due to instability were associated with the posterior (19/40; 47.5%) or direct anterior (15/40; 37.5%) approach (p = 0.001 for the comparison with the direct lateral approach [6/40; 15.0%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite claims of earlier recovery and improved outcomes with the direct anterior approach for THA, our findings indicate that that approach may confer a greater risk of early femoral failure and, along with the posterior approach, confer a greater risk of early instability compared with the direct lateral approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.