Failure at the Tibial Cement-Implant Interface With the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Cement Viscosity and Application Time Lead to Significant Changes in Cement Penetration and Contact Surface Area

Background

Application time and viscosity are factors that can significantly affect the properties of bone cement and implant fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different application times of 2 different cements on mechanical parameters, cement interdigitation, and cement distribution.

Methods

P.F.C. Sigma tibial trays were cemented with high-viscous Palacos R and medium- to low-viscous Simplex P in an open-cell model. The application was performed at different times within the manufacturer's specifications. Cement interdigitation and micromotion were measured with computed tomography scan using a novel method.

Results

Significant differences of insertion forces were found at all times of cement application. Cement penetration decreased with increasing pressure and viscosity. No significant differences were shown for micromotion between Palacos R and Simplex P except for an increase for Simplex P from 3 to 7 minutes at the bone-cement interface. Simplex P appeared to trap air at the implant-cement interface at 3 minutes and increased at 7 minutes.

Conclusions

Cement distribution and intrusion of Palacos R and Simplex P decreased with time. Simplex P trapped air at the implant-cement interface, decreasing the amount of contact at the implant-cement interface, which is worrisome for long-term implant fixation. Given the significant changes in cement properties after mixing, it is necessary for surgeons to understand the viscosity and timing of cement application to achieve optimal cement penetration and surface contact area to potentially decrease implant loosening. High-viscous Palacos R should be applicated immediately with doughing time and medium-viscous Simplex P for about 4 minutes considering a threshold of minimum pressure.

Bone Cement in Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction: A Review of Commercially Available Options and Clinical Outcomes

Polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is used extensively in hip and knee arthroplasty. A thorough understanding of the basic chemistry underlying PMMA is important for orthopaedic surgeons because this underscores the specific way bone cement is used during surgery. Recently, clinical research has shed light on the various types of PMMA regarding the viscosity of the mixture and the effect of cement additives. These variations in composition may alter the clinical efficacy of implanted bone cement in hip and knee arthroplasty. Understanding these key differences will allow the surgeon to tailor the PMMA composition as needed to maximize outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty. This review will summarize the preclinical feature of PMMA, evaluate current and past commercially available bone cement options, analyze preclinical results and clinical outcomes of various bone cement types, and highlight future areas of research.

Femoral Component Debonding Frequently Missed on Advanced Imaging Prior to Revision of a Recalled Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Identification of femoral component debonding in the work-up of painful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often poses a diagnostic challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for identifying femoral component loosening with debonding at the time of revision of a primary TKA with a recalled polyethylene insert.

METHODS

Using an institutional database, we identified all cases of revision TKA performed for this specific implant recall following a primary TKA between 2014 and 2022. Patients who had a preoperative radiograph, CT, and MRI were included (n = 77). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) for predicting loosening were compared among the imaging modalities, using the intraoperative evidence of implant loosening as the gold standard.

RESULTS

At the time of revision surgery, the femoral component was noted to have aseptic loosening with debonding in 46 of the 77 (60%) of the TKAs. There were no significant differences in demographics in the cohort with femoral debonding compared to those with well-fixed implants. The CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 28% and a specificity of 97%, while the MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 94% for detecting femoral loosening due to debonding. Both CT and MRI demonstrated poor negative LRs for femoral loosening (LR 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of revision TKAs for a specific recalled component, neither CT nor MRI accurately diagnosed femoral component debonding. For patients who have this implant, it is imperative to interrogate the implant-cement interface intraoperatively and prepare for full revision surgery as well as marked bone loss secondary to osteolysis.

Is there an increased revision rate due to early tibial component loosening with a modern total knee arthroplasty design? A retrospective analysis from a large volume arthroplasty centre

BACKGROUND

The Attune TKR was introduced in 2011 as a successor to its predicate design The PFC Sigma. However, following reports of early failures, there are ongoing concerns related to increased loosening rates. Given the concerns, this study aimed to compare revision rates of the Attune implant to an established predicate, and other implant designs used in a high-volume arthroplasty center.

METHODS

We identified 10,202 patients who underwent primary cemented TKR at our institution with a minimum of 1 year follow-up, involving 2406 Attune TKR (557 S +), 4642 PFC TKR, 3154 other designs. Primary outcomes were revision for all-causes, aseptic loosening of any component, and aseptic tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression models were used to compare groups. Matched cohorts were selected for radiographic analysis.

RESULTS

308 knees were revised. The Attune cohort had the lowest risk of revision, with a rate of 2.98 per 1000 implant-years while the PFC and All Other Implant groups had a rate of 3.15 and 4.4 respectively. Aseptic loosing was the most common cause for revision, with 76% (65/88) involving the tibia. Survival analysis showed no significant differences between the Attune and other cohorts. Radiolucent lines were detected in 7.1% of the Attune S + group, 6.8% of the standard Attune group, and 6.3% of the PFC group, with no significant differences found between them.

CONCLUSION

This study represents the largest non-registry review of the Attune TKR in comparison to a predicate and other designs. There was no significant increased revision rate for all-cause revision or aseptic loosening, or peri-implant radiolucencies. It appears that increased loosening may not be as concerning as originally thought.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparable bone penetration between antibiotic-loaded and plain bone cement in total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

One of the main concerns around the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is the potential reduction in the mechanical properties of the cement when antibiotics are admixed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference between plain cement and ALBC in terms of radiological intrusion into the bone in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs).

METHODS

Prospective randomized study of 80 consecutive patients who underwent TKA. Depending on the cement used, patients were divided into two groups by a computer-generated randomization programme: the cement without antibiotic (Group 1) or the ALBC (Group 2). Cement intrusion was measured in postoperative radiographs in eight different regions in the tibial component and six regions in the femoral component.

RESULTS

The average cement intrusion was similar in both groups (p = nonsignificance [n.s.]). Group 1 (plain cement) had an average cement intrusion in the femur of 1.4 mm (±0.4) and 2.4 mm (±0.4) in the tibia. In Group 2 (ALBC), the average cement intrusion in the femur came to 1.6 (±0.5) and 2.4 mm (±0.5) in the tibia. In 80% of the patients, the cement intrusion in the tibia averaged a minimum of 2 mm, being similar in both groups (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSION

There are no differences in bone intrusion when comparing plain cement to ALBC. Therefore, the use of ALBC in primary TKA may be indicated, achieving optimal bone penetration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for aseptic loosening in cemented total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Aseptic loosening is the most common cause for revisions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite many studies exploring various risk factors associated with aseptic loosening, findings often present inconsistencies. To address this, we conducted a thorough review of the literature to identify and analyse these risk factors in cemented TKA. Additionally, we performed a meta-analysis to reconcile the divergent conclusions observed across studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase from 1996 up to 2024 and evaluated the quality of the included literature. Seventy-four studies were included to assess the association of BMI, diabetes, high physical activity (HPA), osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), cement material and implant design. Twenty-nine studies were used to calculate relative risk and CIs (using the random effects theory) and study heterogeneity for six different risk factors (BMI, diabetes, HPA level, cement material, polyethylene and implant design).

Results

Patients with diabetes are eight times more likely to experience aseptic loosening compared to those without diabetes (RR = 9.18, 95% CI: 1.80-46.77, p < 0.01). The use of tibial stem extension or highly crosslinked polyethylene can help reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. However, we did not identify BMI, HPA, osteoporosis, RA, the use of high-viscosity cement and the utilization of mobile-bearing designs as risk factors for aseptic loosening post-cemented TKA.

Conclusions

Patients with diabetes undergoing TKA should be counselled regarding their potential increased risk of aseptic loosening. The use of tibial stem extensions and HXLPE can mitigate the incidence of aseptic loosening in cemented TKA. However, given a limited number of studies were included in the meta-analysis, we believe that higher-level studies are necessary to clearly identify other risk factors.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Decreased stress shielding with poly-ether-ether-ketone tibial implant for total knee arthroplasty - A preliminary study using finite element analysis

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the mechanical mismatch between cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy tibial implant and bone has been implicated in stress shielding and subsequent implant failure and bone resorption. This study investigates the biomechanical advantages of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) tibial implant, which exhibit properties analogous to those of the surrounding bone. A finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to assess and compare the biomechanical performances of PEEK and CoCr tibial implants in patients with and without osteoporosis. Four FEA models were constructed with PEEK and CoCr alloy implants in normal and osteoporotic tibias. Based on previous literature and our clinical experience, stresses measurements were taken at 16 points on the tibial plateau and 8 points on the two surfaces which were 10 mm and 20 mm apart from the tibial plateau, with specific regions quantified for stress shielding. The results showed significant differences in stress distribution between PEEK and CoCr implants. The PEEK implants exhibited higher equivalent stresses on the tibial plateau in all models (normal bone: 0.22 ± 0.07 MPa vs. 0.13 ± 0.06 MPa, p < 0.01; osteoporotic bone: 0.39 ± 0.06 MPa vs. 0.17 ± 0.07 MPa, p < 0.01). In non-osteoporotic models, the mean equivalent stresses on proximal tibial surfaces were similarly elevated for PEEK implants (0.29 ± 0.13 MPa vs. 0.21 ± 0.08 MPa, p = 0.02). The CoCr implants demonstrated more stress shielding across all measured regions (tibial plateau: 23.47% vs. 2.73%; surface 1: 15.93% vs. 1.37%; surface 2: 10.71% vs. 6.56%). These disparities were even more pronounced in osteoporotic models in the CoCr group (tibial plateau: 32.50% vs. 8.36%). The maximum equivalent stresses on the tibial plateau further supported this trend (normal bone: 1.02 MPa vs. 0.52 MPa; osteoporotic bone: 1.43 MPa vs. 0.67 MPa). These data confirm the hypothesis that a PEEK tibial implant can reduce peri-prosthetic stress shielding, suggesting that PEEK implants have the capability to distribute loads more uniformly and maintain a closer approximation to physiological conditions.

Passive Biotelemetric Detection of Tibial Debonding in Wireless Battery-Free Smart Knee Implants

Aseptic loosening is the dominant failure mechanism in contemporary knee replacement surgery, but diagnostic techniques are poorly sensitive to the early stages of loosening and poorly specific in delineating aseptic cases from infections. Smart implants have been proposed as a solution, but incorporating components for sensing, powering, processing, and communication increases device cost, size, and risk; hence, minimising onboard instrumentation is desirable. In this study, two wireless, battery-free smart implants were developed that used passive biotelemetry to measure fixation at the implant-cement interface of the tibial components. The sensing system comprised of a piezoelectric transducer and coil, with the transducer affixed to the superior surface of the tibial trays of both partial (PKR) and total knee replacement (TKR) systems. Fixation was measured via pulse-echo responses elicited via a three-coil inductive link. The instrumented systems could detect loss of fixation when the implants were partially debonded (+7.1% PKA, +32.6% TKA, both p < 0.001) and fully debonded in situ (+6.3% PKA, +32.5% TKA, both p < 0.001). Measurements were robust to variations in positioning of the external reader, soft tissue, and the femoral component. With low cost and small form factor, the smart implant concept could be adopted for clinical use, particularly for generating an understanding of uncertain aseptic loosening mechanisms.

Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate total knee arthroplasty (TKA) radiographically to detect the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLL) under the tibial base plate and to determine what type of RLL may have a correlation with aseptic loosening (AL). The study had two hypotheses: (1) RLLs may have different radiological aspects and evolutions in time depending of different factors (2) Signs of micro- and/or macro-mobility of the implant are necessary before diagnosing aseptic loosening of the tibial component.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 774 patients operated with a Vanguard TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, US) from 2007 to 2015. RLLs were recorded in a database and described according to their radiological aspect, localization, time of apparition, progression and eventual evolution to AL. Other collected parameters were pre- and post-operative HKA angles, amount of post-operative HKA correction, surgical, clinical and demographic data.

RESULTS

178/774 TKAs (23%) showed RLLs under the tibial base plate including 9 (1.2%) tibial implants needing revision for AL. Three different types and two aspects of RLLs were observed. Important deformity corrections or undercorrected implants were recognized as a mechanical risk factor for loosening. Elderly women with osteoporosis and young men with important pre-operative deformities were identified as clinical risk factors for RLLs.

CONCLUSIONS

RLLs are frequently present at the epiphyseal bone/implant interface after total knee arthroplasty, but do not mean the implant is loose. They can be considered a sign of reduced epiphyseal surface fixation due to micro mobility of the tibial implant. Aseptic loosening can be observed radiologically when signs of macro-mobility of the implant are present at the metaphyseal level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional versus enhanced-fixation designs of a novel cemented total knee arthroplasty tibial component

Aims

A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis.

Methods

Overall, 50 subjects were randomized (21 EF-TKA and 23 Std-TKA in the final analysis), and had follow-up visits at six weeks, and six, 12, and 24 months to assess migration of the tibial component. Low viscosity bone cement with tobramycin was used in a standardized fashion for all subjects. Patient-reported outcome measure data was captured at preoperative and all postoperative visits.

Results

The patient cohort mean age was 66 years (SD seven years), 59% were female, and the mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 6 kg/m2). Mean two-year subsidence of the EF-TKA was 0.056 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.025 to 0.086) versus 0.006 mm (95% CI -0.029 to 0.040) for the Std-TKA, and the two-year maximum total point motion (MTPM) was 0.285 mm (95% upper confidence limit (UCL) ≤ 0.363) versus 0.346 mm (95% UCL ≤ 0.432), respectively, for a mean difference of -0.061 mm (95% CI -0.196 to 0.074). Inducible displacement also did not differ between groups. The MTPMs between 12 and 24 months for each group was below the published threshold of 0.2 mm for predicting early aseptic loosening (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Both the enhanced fixation and the standard tibial implant design showed fixation with a predicted low risk of long-term aseptic loosening.

High Rates of Aseptic Loosening in Modern Posterior-stabilized Femoral Components From a Single Manufacturer

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the United States. There are concerns and reports of early aseptic loosening due to debonding at the cement-implant interface in a specific posterior-stabilized femoral design. This study describes failure at the cement-implant interface with 2 femoral implant designs produced by a single manufacturer.

Methods

This is a review of failed primary total knee arthroplasties performed with Optetrak Logic and Truliant posterior-stabilized femoral components between 2010 and 2020. Cases with revision surgery performed for femoral component loosening were reviewed.

Results

Seventeen of 896 knees were revised for femoral component loosening. The mean time from index arthroplasty to revision was 73 months. Patients presented with knee pain and recurrent aseptic effusions. More than half of patients had no evidence of component loosening on plain radiographs. Bone scans were positive in 77% of patients with loosening. Femoral components were easily disimpacted from the cement mantle at the time of revision surgery. Patients were treated with femoral only revision or femoral and tibial revision. Two complications occurred in this series.

Conclusions

Providers should maintain vigilance in the surveillance of patients with these implants. Clinicians should have a low threshold for additional diagnostic testing if these patients develop pain and/or recurrent effusions. Isolated femoral or complete revision both seem to be acceptable treatment strategies for this failure mechanism.

High rate of radiolucent lines following the cemented original design of the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty

Aims

Loosening of components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with the development of radiolucent lines (RLLs). The aim of this study was to assess the rate of formation of RLLs in the cemented original design of the ATTUNE TKA and their relationship to loosening.

Methods

A systematic search was undertaken using the Cochrane methodology in three online databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Studies were screened against predetermined criteria, and data were extracted. Available National Joint Registries in the Network of Orthopaedic Registries of Europe were also screened. A random effects model meta-analysis was undertaken.

Results

Of 263 studies, 12 were included with a total of 3,861 TKAs. Meta-analysis of ten studies showed high rates of overall tibial or femoral RLLs for the cemented original design of the ATTUNE TKA. The overall rate was 21.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.7% to 33.7%) for all types of design but was higher for certain subgroups: 27.4% (95% CI 13.4% to 47.9%) for the cruciate-retaining type, and 29.9% (95% CI 15.6% to 49.6%) for the fixed-bearing type. Meta-analysis of five studies comparing the ATTUNE TKA with other implants showed a significantly higher risk of overall tibial or femoral RLLs (odds ratio (OR) 2.841 (95% CI 1.219 to 6.623); p = 0.016) for the ATTUNE. The rates of loosening or revision for loosening were lower, at 1.2% and 0.9% respectively, but the rates varied from 0% to 16.3%. The registry data did not report specifically on the original ATTUNE TKA or on revision due to loosening, but 'all-cause' five-year revision rates for the cemented ATTUNE varied from 2.6% to 5.9%.

Conclusion

The original cemented ATTUNE TKA has high rates of RLLs, but their clinical significance is uncertain given the overall low associated rates of loosening and revision. However, in view of the high rates of RLLs and the variation in the rates of loosening and revision between studies and registries, close surveillance of patients who have undergone TKA with the original ATTUNE system is recommended.

Trends in Total Knee Arthroplasty Cementing Technique Among Arthroplasty Surgeons-A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening persists as one of the leading causes of failure following cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cement technique may impact implant fixation. We hypothesized that there is variability in TKA cement technique among arthroplasty surgeons.

METHODS

A 28-question survey regarding variables in surgeons' preferred TKA cementation technique was distributed to 2,791 current American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) members with a response rate of 30.8% (903 respondents). Patterns of responses were analyzed by grouping respondents by their answers to certain questions including cementing technique, tibial cement location, and femoral cement location.

RESULTS

A total of 73.5% reported performing at least 7 of 8 of the highest consensus techniques, including vacuum mixing (79.9%), using two bags (76.1%), tibial implant first (95.2%), single-stage cementing (96.9%), compression of the implants in extension (91.7%), and use of a tourniquet (84.3%). Medium and high viscosity cement was most commonly used (37.9 and 37.8%, respectively). Finger pressurization was most common (76.1%) compared to a gun (29.8%). There were 26.5% of respondents performing 6 or fewer of the most common majority techniques and seemed to perform other less common techniques (eg, use of a single bag of cement, trialing or closure prior to cement curing, and heating to accelerate cement curing). Cement was most commonly applied to the entire bone and implant surface on both the tibia (46.4%) and femur (47.7%), leaving much variation in the remaining cement application location responses.

DISCUSSION

There appears to be variability in cemented TKA technique among arthroplasty surgeons. There were 26.5% of respondents performing less of the majority techniques and also performed other additional low-response rate techniques. Further studies that look at the impacts of variation in techniques on outcomes may be warranted. Our study demonstrates the need for defining best practices for cement technique given the substantial variability identified.

No Difference in Revision Rate Between Low Viscosity and High Viscosity Cement Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Loosening remains one of the most common reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cement viscosity has a potential role in reducing revision rates for loosening. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome for loosening of the 5 most used cemented knee prostheses by constraint type, based on the cement viscosity type used.

METHODS

There were 214,708 TKA procedures performed between 1999 and 2020 for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis using the 5 most commonly used minimally stabilized, posterior stabilized, and medial pivot design cemented tibial components. Only procedures with a cemented tibial component were included. Outcomes for two different cement viscosities, 140,060 high viscosity and 74,648 low viscosity cement, were compared for each fixation type within each of the three stability groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in a risk of all-cause revision when high viscosity cement was used compared to low viscosity cement for minimally stabilized prostheses (hazards ratio [HR] 1.07 [95% CI 0.99-1.15], P = .09), posterior stabilized prostheses (HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.95-1.11], P = .53), and medial pivot design prostheses (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.80-1.41], P = .67). No difference was observed between cement viscosity types for any of the prosthesis constraint types when aseptic loosening was assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in the risk of revision for any reason, or for loosening, with cement viscosity for the most commonly used minimally stabilized, posterior stabilized, and medial pivot TKA. The role of cement viscosity in the risk of TKA revision remains unclear and further research is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Retrospective comparative study.

Tibial Baseplate-Cement Interface Debonding in the ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty System

Background

Acrylic bone cement is the most common method of fixation for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several studies have described good short-term outcomes; however, there have been reports of early failures due to tibial baseplate debonding at the implant-cement interface of The ATTUNE Knee System (DePuy Synthes, West Chester, PA). We examined the causes and rates of revision in patients who underwent TKA with this system to identify factors associated with this mode of early failure.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic health records between 2013 and 2018 identified all patients undergoing TKA with the ATTUNE Knee System with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Cause of revision, patient, implant, instrumentation, cement, and surgeon variables were collected. A descriptive analysis was used to identify characteristics of surgeon (fellowship-trained, surgical volume), implant (baseplate, bearing), and cement (brand, viscosity) that were associated with aseptic loosening.

Results

A total of 668 patients representing 742 knees were identified. Eighteen (2.4%) required a revision surgery. Aseptic loosening was the leading cause of revision surgery (n = 10, 55.6%). All failures due to aseptic loosening involved debonding of the tibial implant-cement interface. A multivariate analysis identified low-volume surgeons (9.0%, P < .0001) and 1 specific brand of high-viscosity cement (14.3%, P < .0001) as risk factors for aseptic loosening.

Conclusions

This study represents the largest nonregistry review of the original ATTUNE Knee System. Surgeon case volume and cement viscosity were factors associated with an increased rate of early failure due to tibial baseplate implant-cement interface debonding.

Modern cementless posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty shows comparable clinical and radiographical results to its cemented predecessor at 1-year follow-up

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate perioperative and short-term clinical and radiographical results of a modern PS mobile-bearing cementless TKA system.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a consecutive series of TKAs was performed by a single surgeon using a cementless or cemented TKA of the same design (Attune, DePuy Synthes, Massachusetts, USA). The 2011 Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score-12, Hip-Knee-Ankle angle, and the presence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) were reviewed 1-year postoperatively with 1:1 matching performed for age, gender, body mass index, and preoperative UCLA score. Fisher's exact test or independent Student's t-test were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-five cementless and 45 cemented TKAs were reviewed after 1:1 matching. The mean operative time was 8.8 min shorter (P < .01), and the mean amount of drainage was 40.0 ml greater (P = .04) in the cementless cohort. At 1-year postoperatively, there were no significant differences in both cohorts in 2011 Knee Scores and Forgotten Joint Scores-12, with no patients requiring revision surgery (NS). The incidence of RLLs was significantly higher in cementless TKAs (51%) than that in cemented TKAs (22%, P < .01). However, the mean width of RLLs in the cementless TKAs (0.2 mm) was significantly smaller (P < .01) than that in the cemented TKAs (0.8 mm) at 1-year postoperatively with no progression.

CONCLUSION

A recently introduced cementless PS mobile-bearing TKA design demonstrated comparable postoperative and radiographical results to its cemented predecessor at 1-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report

Background

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revision change. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason for revision TKA at our institution among early and late failures and assess if the etiology has changed over a 10-year time-period.

Methods

We identified 258 revision TKAs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Reasons for revision TKA were categorized according to diagnosis. We also conducted subgroup analysis for TKA revisions performed within two years of the primary TKA (early failures) and those performed after two years (late failures). Revision TKAs were also grouped by year of primary TKA (before and after 2000) and time period in which the revision TKA was performed (2005–2009 and 2010–2014).

Results

The most common reason for revision TKA was infection (29.3%), followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%), which together accounted for half of all revisions. Other indications for revision were instability (11.6%), osteolysis (10.4%), arthrofibrosis (8.1%), polyethylene (PE) wear (7.7%), malalignment/malposition (5.4%), patellar complication (3.1%), periprosthetic fracture (2.3%), pain (1.5%), and extensor mechanism deficiency (0.8%). Nearly half of early failures (47%) were due to infection. Osteolysis and PE wear made of a significantly higher proportion of revisions of TKAs performed prior to 2000 compared to index TKAs performed after 2000.

Conclusion

At our institution, infection was the most common reason for revision TKA. Infection had a higher rate of early revisions. Proportion of TKAs revised for osteolysis and PE wear was higher for TKAs performed prior to 2000. Proportion of revision TKA for infection and instability were higher with TKAs performed after 2000.

High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement

Aims

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and safe orthopaedic procedure. Zimmer Biomet's NexGen is the second most popular brand of implant used in the UK. The primary cause of revision after the first year is aseptic loosening. We present our experience of using this implant, with significant concerns around its performance with regards early aseptic loosening of the tibial component.

Methods

A retrospective, single-surgeon review was carried out of all of the NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed in this institute. The specific model used for the index procedures was the NexGen Complete Knee System (Legacy Knee-Posterior Stabilized LPS-Flex Articular Surface, LPS-Flex Femoral Component Option, and Stemmed Nonaugmentable Tibial Component Option).

Results

Between 2013 and 2016, 352 NexGen TKAs were carried out on 331 patients. A total of 62 TKAs have been revised to date, giving an all-cause revision rate of 17.6% at a minimum of five years. Three of these revisions were due to infection. Overall, 59 of the revisions were performed for aseptic loosening (16.7%) of the tibial component. The tibial component was removed intraoperatively without instrumentation due to significant tibial debonding between the implant-cement interface.

Conclusion

While overall, we believe that early aseptic loosening is multi-factorial in nature, the significantly high aseptic revision rate, as seen by an experienced fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon, has led us to believe that there is a fundamental issue with this NexGen implant design. Continued implant surveillance and rigorous review across all regions using this particular implant is warranted based on the concerning findings described here.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):495–501.

High Survivorship of a Modular Titanium Baseplate Independent of Body Mass Index and Malalignment

BACKGROUND

Tibial component aseptic loosening remains problematic in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Influential factors include component design, metallurgy, and cement technique. Additionally, reports advocate for longer tibial stem fixation in high body mass index (BMI) patients. We have utilized a single stem length modular titanium baseplate in patients regardless of BMI, bone quality, or malalignment. We report the survivorship of this implant with focus on the impact of elevated BMI and postoperative malalignment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent TKA with a single modular titanium baseplate with a cruciate-shaped keel between 2004 and 2018. In total, 2,949 TKAs with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The mean follow-up was 7 years. The primary outcome was component failure stratified by BMI and postoperative malalignment. High viscosity cement was utilized in all cases. Chi-squared and t-tests were used to compare outcome variables across groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-five implants (2.8%) were revised with 46 (1.6%) for aseptic loosening. Failure was not associated with BMI, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, or Charlson Comorbidity Index. There was no difference in failure rate by BMI (P = .26) or by malalignment (outside of 3° from neutral mechanical axis) (P = .67). Age was associated with failure as patients with failed TKAs were younger (61 vs 65, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This design of a specific modular titanium base plate with a cruciate-shaped keel and grit blast surface demonstrated 99% survivorship regardless of patient BMI or malalignment over 7-year follow-up period. Consistent cement technique with high viscosity cement indicates that component design remains an important variable impacting survivorship in TKA.

Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness

BACKGROUND

With the Persona® knee system a novel anatomic total knee design was developed, which has no pre-coating, whereas the predecessor knee system is pre-coated with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Joint registry data have shown no decrease in risk of aseptic revision of PMMA pre-coated tibial components compared with non-pre-coated implants. The aim of this retrieval study was to compare the amount of cement adhesions, geometry and surface features between the two knee designs and to correlate them with the underlying reason for revision surgery.

METHODS

Retrieval analysis was performed of 15 NexGen® and 8 Persona® fixed-bearing knee implants from the same manufacturer retrieved from two knee revision centres. A photogrammetric method was used to grade the amount of cement attached to the tibial tray backside. The geometry and dimensions of the tibial trays, tray projections and peripheral lips were measured using digital callipers and compared between the two different designs. To measure the surface roughness on the backside of the tibial tray, a contact profilometer was used. To investigate differences between the two designs statistical analyses (t-test) were performed.

RESULTS

All Persona® trays showed evidence of cement adhesion with a % area of 75.4%; half of the NexGen® trays had cement adhesions, with a mean value of 20%. There was a significant difference in the percentage of area covered by cement between the two designs (p < 0.001). Results from the contact profilometer revealed that Persona® and NexGen® tray backsides showed a similar lateral (1.36 μm and 1.10 μm) and medial (1.39 μm and 1.12 μm) mean surface roughness with significant differentiation (p < 0.05) of the lateral and medial roughness values between the two designs. Persona® stems showed a significantly higher mean surface roughness (1.26) compared to NexGen® stems (0.89; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel anatomic knee system showed significantly more cements adhesions and a higher surface roughness which was most likely attributed to the most obvious design and coating alteration of the tibial tray. This study provides first retrieval findings of a novel TKA design recently introduced to the market.

Does tibial design modification improve implant stability for total knee arthroplasty? An experimental cadaver study

Aims

One of the main causes of tibial revision surgery for total knee arthroplasty is aseptic loosening. Therefore, stable fixation between the tibial component and the cement, and between the tibial component and the bone, is essential. A factor that could influence the implant stability is the implant design, with its different variations. In an existing implant system, the tibial component was modified by adding cement pockets. The aim of this experimental in vitro study was to investigate whether additional cement pockets on the underside of the tibial component could improve implant stability. The relative motion between implant and bone, the maximum pull-out force, the tibial cement mantle, and a possible path from the bone marrow to the metal-cement interface were determined.

Methods

A tibial component with (group S: Attune S+) and without (group A: Attune) additional cement pockets was implanted in 15 fresh-frozen human leg pairs. The relative motion was determined under dynamic loading (extension-flexion 20° to 50°, load-level 1,200 to 2,100 N) with subsequent determination of the maximum pull-out force. In addition, the cement mantle was analyzed radiologically for possible defects, the tibia base cement adhesion, and preoperative bone mineral density (BMD).

Results

The BMD showed no statistically significant difference between both groups. Group A showed for all load levels significantly higher maximum relative motion compared to group S for 20° and 50° flexion. Group S improved the maximum failure load significantly compared to group A without additional cement pockets. Group S showed a significantly increased cement adhesion compared to group A. The cement penetration and cement mantle defect analysis showed no significant differences between both groups.

Conclusion

From a biomechanical point of view, the additional cement pockets of the component have improved the fixation performance of the implant.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(4):229–238.

Early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty: a narrative overview of potentially associated factors

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly effective surgical procedure, but in some patients TKAs fail early due to a variety of underlying factors. About 11% of revision TKAs within one year of primary TKA are the result of aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface. Literature regarding the most important factors associated with this type of loosening is scarce. The objective is to give an overview of the literature regarding factors associated with aseptic loosening of the tibia component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty. A narrative literature review based on publications identified through PubMed and CINAHL databases. Twelve studies were identified, which describe a total of 299 cases of early aseptic loosening of the tibia component at the cement-implant interface. The main associated factors reported were cementa- tion factors. These factors included the use of high viscosity cement (HVC), cement application methods and cement thickness. Other main reported associated factor related to implant design factors, which included component shape and surface roughness. The least frequently reported associated factors related to the patient characteristics of body mass index (BMI). Several factors associated with early aseptic loosening of the tibial component at the cement-implant interface in total knee arthroplasty were identified in this review. The most frequently reported associated factors related to cementation factors and implant design factors. Because the literature in this area is scarce, further research is warranted in an effort to prevent early aseptic loosening in future TKAs.

Loosening of tibia baseplates after total knee arthroplasty: Evaluation of pull-out strength of tibia baseplate-cement Interface

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is reported as the leading cause of revision total knee arthroplasty on the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry. Loosening of cemented tibial baseplates has been correlated with type of cement used, cementing technique, and cement contamination with biological material. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cementing application and techniques including surface contamination and cement viscosity on fixation strength of tibia baseplates/cement interface.

METHODS

Mechanical assessment of the fixation strength of tibia baseplates/cement interface was tested using a pull-out test on a material testing system. Different tibial baseplate design, cementing techniques, cement viscosity and contamination of the implant/cement interface with bone marrow were assessed to determine if they influenced force required to disrupt the cement/implant interface (pull-out strength).

FINDINGS

The model with contamination of the cement prosthesis interface demonstrated a lower pull-out strength (p < 0.001). The model with the keel and baseplate cemented showed a higher pull-out strength compared to cementing the baseplate alone (p < 0.001). The use of low-viscosity cement resulted in a significantly higher failure force (p = 0.002) compared to high-viscosity cement when cementing the baseplate alone.

INTERPRETATIONS

Biomechanical testing demonstrated improved fixation with cementing the tibial keel and keeping surfaces free from contamination during the cementation process.

Cement debonding behaviors of the various tibial components of the ATTUNE knee system and its predecessors: Is a cement-in-cement revision an alternative?

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening remains one of the most common causes of revision of the tibial component for total knee arthroplasty. A stable bond between implant and cement is essential for appropriate long-term results. The aim of our in vitro study was to investigate the maximum failure load of tibial ATTUNE prosthesis design alternatives compared with a previous design. In addition, cement-in-cement revision was considered as a potential strategy after tibial component debonding.

METHODS

The experimental investigations of the maximum failure load of the implant-cement interface were performed under optimal conditions, without potential contamination. We compared the designs of the tibial components of the ATTUNE, ATTUNE S+ and P.F.C. Sigma. In addition, we investigated the cement-in-cement revision for the ATTUNE knee system replacing it with an ATTUNE S+.

RESULTS

The maximum failure load showed no significant difference between P.F.C. Sigma and ATTUNE groups (P = 0.087), but there was a significant difference between the P.F.C. Sigma and the ATTUNE S+ groups (P < 0.001). The analysis also showed a significant difference (P < 0.001) between the ATTUNE and the ATTUNE S+ groups for the maximum failure load. The ATTUNE S+ cement-in-cement revision group showed a significant higher failure load (P < 0.001) compared with the P.F.C. Sigma and ATTUNE groups. No significant differences (P = 1.000) were found between the ATTUNE S+ cement-in-cement and ATTUNE S+ group.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, we found no design-specific evidence of increased debonding risk with the ATTUNE and ATTUNE S+ components compared with the P.F.C Sigma. Furthermore, the cement-in-cement revision seems to be an alternative for the revision surgery.

Unexpected high rate of revision of a modern cemented fixed bearing modular posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty

AIMS

To establish our early clinical results of a new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) tibial component introduced in 2013 and compare it to other designs in use at our hospital during the same period.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 166 (154 patients) consecutive cemented, fixed bearing, posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs (ATTUNE) at one hospital performed by five surgeons. These were compared with a reference cohort of 511 knees (470 patients) of other designs (seven manufacturers) performed at the same hospital by the same surgeons. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or follow-up times between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was revision performed or pending.

RESULTS

In total, 19 (11.5%) ATTUNE study TKAs have been revised at a mean 30.3 months (SD 15), and loosening of the tibial component was seen in 17 of these (90%). Revision is pending in 12 (7%) knees. There was no difference between the 31 knees revised or with revision pending and the remaining 135 study knees in terms of patient characteristics, type of bone cement (p = 0.988), or individual surgeon (p = 0.550). In the reference cohort, there were significantly fewer knees revised (n = 13, 2.6%) and with revision pending (n = 8, 1.5%) (both p < 0.001), and only two had loosening of the tibial component as the reason for revision.

CONCLUSION

This new TKA design had an unexpectedly high early rate of revision compared with our reference cohort of TKAs. Debonding of the tibial component was the most common reason for failure. Additional longer-term follow-up studies of this specific component and techniques for implantation are warranted. The version of the ATTUNE tibial component implanted in this study has undergone modifications by the manufacturer. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):137-144.

Early tibial loosening of the cemented ATTUNE knee arthroplasty - Just a question of design?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty is a very successful standard treatment for severe osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, the literature reports tibial debonding between implant and bone cement as well as radiolucent lines related to the tibial components of different knee systems. Regardless of cementing techniques and the influences during surgery, we examined the design of a newly developed knee system and its predecessors (Attune, Attune S+, P.F.C. Sigma, P.F.C. Sigma RP/M.B.T., all DePuy).

METHODS

We investigated the dimensions of the tibial components and the fit between them and their bone bed after instrumentation in a foam material.

RESULTS

Our results showed considerable differences for the used knee prostheses as well as their tibial instrumentation options with a corresponding risk for incomplete seating.

CONCLUSION

The orthopedic surgeons need to be aware of these design features and the resulting increased seating resistance especially in hard and sclerotic bone.

ARTICLE FOCUS

Comparison of the tibial instruments and the different design options of the Attune knee system and its predecessor knee prostheses.

KEY MESSAGES

The Attune implant showed incomplete seating because of too much press fit and an uneven bone quality or sclerosis can result in tilting of the tibial component.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This is the first study investigating the Attune knee and its predecessor in terms of implant seating and press fit. The foam material is a limitation.

Tibial Component Migration After Total Knee Arthroplasty With High-Viscosity Bone Cement

BACKGROUND

High-viscosity (HV) bone cements have been formulated to offer potentially advantageous handling characteristics. However, alteration in the handling characteristics could influence implant fixation and survival. The primary objective of this study was to use radiostereometric analysis after total knee arthroplasty to assess the migration of the Triathlon tibial component fixed with HV cement (Simplex HV).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients were followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis examinations at 6 visits. Migration was compared with published thresholds and with a control group from a previously published study from the same center using the same implants fixed with a medium viscosity cement. Inducible displacement was assessed, and Oxford 12 Knee Scores and satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean maximum total point motion migration reaching 0.40 mm (SD 0.16) at one year, and 0.41mm (SD 0.17) at two years, demonstrating a pattern of stable fixation, below published thresholds of acceptable migration, and not significantly different from the control group. One implant had continuous migration between 1 and 2 years but was clinically asymptomatic. Mean maximum total point motion inducible displacement measured at least one year postoperatively was 0.3 mm (SD 0.12). Mean Oxford 12 Knee Scores improved from 19 (SD 7) preoperatively to 42 (SD 8) 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HV cement demonstrated an acceptable pattern of migration at 2 years, indicating low risk for aseptic loosening.

The Association Between Cement Viscosity and Revision Risk After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recent case series have reported early failure with the use of high-viscosity cement (HVC) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated revision risk after TKA with HVC compared with medium-viscosity cement (MVC) in a large cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using data from Kaiser Permanente's Total Joint Replacement Registry. Patients who underwent fully cemented primary TKA for osteoarthritis were identified (2001-2018). Only posterior-stabilized, fixed-mobility designs of the 3 highest-volume implant systems (DePuy PFC, Zimmer NexGen, and Zimmer Persona) were included to mitigate confounding from implant characteristics. Palacos (Zimmer/Heraeus) and Simplex (Stryker) cements comprised the HVC and MVC exposure groups, respectively. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate risk for any revision during follow-up and risk for revision from aseptic loosening specifically.

RESULTS

The final cohort comprised 76,052 TKAs, 41.1% using MVC. The crude 14-year cumulative revision probability was 4.55% and 5.12% for TKA with MVC and HVC, respectively. In propensity score-weighted Cox models, MVC compared with HVC had a lower risk of any revision (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.70-0.95) while no difference was observed for revision from aseptic loosening (hazard ratio = 0.80, 95% confidence interval = 0.56-1.13).

CONCLUSION

While we observed a lower risk for any revision with the use of Simplex MVC compared with Palacos HVC, we did not observe a difference in revision for aseptic loosening specifically. Given the widespread use of HVC, additional research to investigate other HVC and potential mechanisms for failure outside of loosening is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

High-Viscosity Versus a Lower-Viscosity Cement Penetration at Dough Phase In Vivo in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that the depth of cement penetration and the presence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) correspond with the risk of aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty, while others have found a correlation between the viscosity of the cement and the depth of cement penetration. We compared cement marketed as high-viscosity cement (HVC) with one marketed by the same manufacturer as low-viscosity cement (LVC). We hypothesized that no significant difference would be found in depth of penetration or presence of RLLs between the two cohorts.

METHODS

The HVC (n = 50) and LVC cohorts (n = 50) were gathered from two sequential series of primary total knee arthroplasties using the same implants and cementing techniques. Depth of cement penetration and presence of RLL were measured in four tibial zones and were compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

There were no cases of aseptic loosening in either cohort at a mean of 29 months. Mean maximum cement penetration in 3 of the 4 zones was >3 mm with both cements. There was no significant difference in maximum penetration in any zone between the two cements. There were fewer tibial radiolucencies with HVC than LVC.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the marketing description of HVC or LVC is not necessarily a factor in cement penetration. The term high viscosity should not be used as a descriptor of cement that reaches dough phase more quickly, but rather cement that has a higher viscosity at its dough phase when it is typically applied.

Modular Tibial Stem Use and Risk of Revision for Aseptic Loosening in Cemented Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Modular tibial stem extensions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are designed to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening of the tibial base plate. However, these implants add significant cost and an evaluation of their effectiveness in reducing this risk of loosening has not been studied in a large cohort. We sought to evaluate modular tibial stem utilization in primary TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using our integrated healthcare system's Total Joint Replacement Registry. Patients who underwent cemented primary TKA were identified (2009-2019). Propensity scores were used to 1:1 match patients without to those with a stem extension. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk for revision due to aseptic loosening.

RESULTS

Ten thousand four hundred seventy six TKA with a modular tibial stem were matched to 10,476 TKA without a tibial stem. Stem utilization associated with a lower risk of revision for loosening across all postoperative follow-up (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.85).

CONCLUSION

In a matched cohort study, we observed presence of a stem extension was associated with a lower risk of revision for aseptic loosening. Further study to identify specific risk factors for aseptic loosening and confirm the findings presented here are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Implant Interface Debonding After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A New Cause for Concern?

Background

Aseptic loosening has long been an associated etiology for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

This case series investigates commonalities between 9 patients who underwent revision TKA and were found to have complete debonding at the cement-implant interface of a femoral and/or tibial component within the past 2 years.

Results

Only 3 preoperative radiographs were indicative of aseptic loosening, and all patients had an infectious etiology ruled out.

Conclusions

This case series and other similar reports suggest that there may be a growing concern for debonding as a modern form of aseptic loosening. Further research through American Joint Replacement Registry and other national databases will need to be conducted to better understand if this is truly a new cause for concern after TKA and how it may be best prevented.

A potential need for surgeon consensus: Cementation techniques for total knee arthroplasty in orthopedic implant manufacturers' guidelines lack consistency

AIM

Given recent concerns regarding the influence of different cements and implants on the rate of aseptic failures in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we wondered if cementation technique could play a role. The primary aim of this review was to collect and compare the surgeon education materials from eight orthopedic implant manufacturers to evaluate the manufacturers' recommended cementation technique in TKA and identify if there was any consistency in these readily available guides as to the best practices of cementation of their implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed contemporary surgeon education guidelines for all TKA systems available from eight manufacturers. Variables included: cement type, batches prepared, surface preparation prior to application, cleaning and/or drying the bone surface, mixing the cement, the waiting phase after the cement has been mixed prior to application, pressurizing the cement, location of cement application, and the curing time. Data were recorded and organized for qualitative comparisons.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 43 guides covering 38 implants from eight different manufacturers. There were 41 surgical technique guides and two general brochures regarding cementation techniques available from the manufacturers. Even within the manufacturers' own guidelines for the different implants, there was a wide variety of differing guidelines on many aspects of the cementation technique.

CONCLUSION

There is clearly no consensus for a preferred cementation technique both within and among manufacturers' surgeon education materials regarding tibial baseplate cementation during TKA. Efforts may be needed to identify a best-practice cementation technique in an effort to reduce the number of TKA failures associated with aseptic loosening.

Cement-In-Cement All-Polyethylene Tibial Revision: A Report of 3 Cases

CASE

Debonding of the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty is a known complication that is typically treated with revision surgery, most commonly revision to a metal-backed tibial component with or without stems. Here, we present 3 cases of tibial component debonding revised to all-polyethylene tibial components with a cement-in-cement technique.

CONCLUSION

In instances of tibial component debonding, if specific criteria are met, revising to an all-polyethylene tibia with retention of the primary cement mantle is an alternative to revision surgery with cement extraction and implantation of a modular metal-backed tibia.

Factors affecting aseptic loosening in primary total knee replacements: an in vitro study

Background

Implant surface integrity and cement bonding are assumed to be sufficient in primary total knee replacements to stabilize implants for extended wear without concerns over delamination and loosening. Yet there exists a significant rate of aseptic loosening where failure at implant cement interface occurs. The aim of this study is to look at specific aspects leading to aseptic loosening of the total knee replacement, where cement adhesion to the implant results in the lowest pull off strength.

Methods

Virgin ceramic coated and uncoated chrome cobalt tibial trays were used in a pull off study using differing viscosities of cement at varied time intervals to compare which combination is strongest compared to which is least resistant to pull off testing.

Results

Low viscosity cement had a 44% (5.9 kg verses 3.3 kg, p < 0.001) higher pull-off strength compared to high viscosity cement. Coated implants had a 30% (3.9 kg verses 5.5 kg, p = 0.037) lower pull-off strength compared to non-coated. Testing measures were limited to cement utilization less than 5 minutes due to the poor adhesion of the dowels beyond this time. Finally, there was a significant difference in adhesion properties between brand names when utilizing low viscosity cement on the non-coated trays (10.34 kg for Simplex verses 4.87 for Palacos, p = 0.021).

Conclusion

There are differences in adhesion properties between cement vendors, prompting significant concerns over the use of coated implants with particular cement types. Use of low viscosity cement on non-coated surfaces in the early liquid phase of cement curing was found to produce the best chance for adequate adhesion. This study demonstrates that there is variation in the adhesive properties of implants utilized in total knee replacements, and that the orthopedic community should consider not only the implant, cement, and curing time individually, but the overall integrity conferred from the combination of all of these variables.

Aseptic Loosening at the Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Function of Cement Mantle Quality?

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening remains one of the leading causes for failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We sought to identify early radiographic measures that may associate with aseptic tibial component loosening, emphasizing systematic evaluation of the cement mantle.

METHODS

All TKA revisions from 2007 to 2015 with the primary indication of tibial aseptic loosening were identified using in an institutional implant retrieval database. After exclusion criteria, 61 TKAs comprised the study group. A matched control group of 59 TKAs that had not failed at a minimum of 3 years was identified for comparison. Radiographic analysis on all 6-week postoperative radiographs included angulation of components, cement penetration depth, and presence of radiolucency at the implant-cement and bone-cement interfaces. Groups were compared with Student's t-test, chi-squared test, and Mann-Whitney U-test. A final multivariable logistic regression model was formed for the outcome of aseptic loosening.

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, failure was associated with a greater number of zones with cement penetration <2 mm (5.6 vs 3.4 zones, odds ratio [OR] 1.89, P < .001), increasing percent involvement of radiolucency at the implant-cement interface (8.7% vs 3.1%, OR = 1.15, P = .001), and increased varus alignment of the tibial component (1.5° vs 0°, OR = 1.35, P = .014). A greater number of zones with a radiolucent line at the bone-cement interface did not significantly associate (1.1 vs 0.3, P = .091).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that radiographic indicators of poor cement mantle quality associate with later aseptic loosening. This emphasizes the need for surgeons to perform careful cement technique in order to reduce the risk of TKA failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Case-control).

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using High-Viscosity Cement is Associated With Higher Odds of Revision for Aseptic Loosening

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening (AL) is the most common reason for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An association between high-viscosity cement (HVC) and AL has been suggested by small, uncontrolled, case series. This study sought to determine whether HVC use during primary TKA is independently associated with AL requiring revision.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected institutional knee registry to identify all primary TKAs from January 2007 to December 2016. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded. Cement type was divided into 2 groups: HVC and low-viscosity cement. Potential confounders including age, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, antibiotics in the cement, and implant type were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether HVC is independently associated with revision for AL.

RESULTS

In total, 10,014 patients were included. Revision for AL was significantly higher in the HVC cohort (91/4790; 1.9%) vs the low-viscosity cement cohort (48/5224; 0.92%) (P < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated HVC to be independently associated with higher odds of revision for AL (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.58-3.22, P < .001). Younger age was also associated with higher odds of revision for AL (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.98, P < .001). Body mass index, gender, laterality, preoperative diagnosis, and antibiotics in the cement were not associated with revision for AL. Implant manufacturer, implant design, and cement brand all impacted the odds of undergoing revision for AL.

CONCLUSION

Although HVC is an attractive option for use in primary TKA, this appropriately controlled study demonstrates higher odds of revision for AL when using HVC with multiple different implant types.

Reduced Aseptic Loosening With Fully Cemented Short-Stemmed Tibial Components in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recently, the use of short tibial stems in the obese population undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proposed. Thus, we designed a study to assess tibial component survivorship after primary TKA using a single implant both with and without a fully cemented stem extension performed by a single surgeon.

METHODS

A search of our institutional research database was performed. A minimum 2-year follow-up was selected. Cohorts were created according to patient body mass index (BMI; >40 kg/m² and <40 kg/m²) and the presence (stemmed tibia [ST]) or absence (non-stemmed tibia [NST]) of a short tibial stem extension. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses for aseptic loosening and log-rank tests were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients were identified (ST = 162, NST = 74). Baseline patient characteristics were statistically similar between cohorts with the exception of BMI which was greater in the ST cohort (32.9 kg/m², 30.6 kg/m²; P = .01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 5 years was superior for the BMI < 40 kg/m² cohort (98.9%, 93.1%; P = .045), the ST cohort (100%, 94.5%; P = .006), and the BMI > 40 kg/m² with ST cohort at 4 years (71.4%, 100%; P = .008).

CONCLUSION

Morbid obesity and a short native tibial stem design appear to be associated with aseptic loosening in primary TKA. This appears to be mitigated through the use of an ST. As such, the use of ST may be considered in at-risk patients. Alternatively, implants with longer native stem designs can be employed. Modern short-stemmed tibial components may need to be redesigned.

Use of National Joint Registries to Evaluate a New Knee Arthroplasty Design

BACKGROUND

The introduction of new technology in joint replacement surgery requires close monitoring to identify early successes and failures. This monitoring can be effectively performed through the analysis of registry data and radiostereometric analysis studies. This study examined the revision rates of a contemporary knee system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using National Joint Replacement Registries.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to identify comparative studies and registry databases reporting the revision rates of a specific contemporary knee design between 2013 and 2018. The total number of TKA cases performed using this implant was recorded. The latest follow-up or duration of monitoring through a registry database was used to report implant survivorship.

RESULTS

There were 4 registry databases and 1 comparative study reporting the revision rates of the contemporary knee system. A total of 41,483 cases were identified with a follow-up range of 1.5-5.0 years. The all-cause revision rate ranged from 0.7% to 2.5% at latest follow-up. This was comparable to all-cause revision rates of other knee systems reported in the registries, ranging from 0.8% to 5.6% over similar follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of data from multiple national joint registries demonstrated the revision rate for this contemporary knee system to be comparable to other TKA systems at latest follow-up. None of the registries have identified any concerning rates of revision compared to other devices at this length of follow-up. National Joint Registries are an important resource in evaluating the short-term, mid-term, and long-term results of new implant designs introduced to the market.

A Retrospective Study Comparing a Patient-specific Design Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Off-the-Shelf Design: Unexpected Catastrophic Failure Seen in the Early Patient-specific Design

Patient-specific design (PSD) total knee arthroplasty implants are marketed to restore neutral mechanical-axis alignment (MAA) and provide better anatomic fit compared with standard off-the-shelf (OTS) total knee arthroplasty designs. The purpose was to compare the Knee Society scores, radiographic outcomes, and complications of PSD and OTS implants.

Early experience with the ATTUNE Total Knee Replacement System

BACKGROUND

Modern TKA implants promise to improve functional outcomes, stability, patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate our short-term clinical and radiological results and survival using the ATTUNE Total Knee Replacement System.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 228 primary cemented TKAs using ATTUNE Total Knee Replacement System which were implanted between 2014 and 2018 concerning short-term clinical and radiographical outcomes and survival. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Score and a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain. Radiographic analysis was performed using the Modern Knee Society Score Evaluation System.

RESULTS

The means of the clinical results as measured with KOOS score were Pain 82,7, Symptoms 79, ADL 78,3, Sport and recreation 51,8 and QOL 78,6. The mean Oxford score was 35 and NRS 2. The mean ROM was 113,4 (SD 9,4 range 90-130). Radiographically mean mechanical axis was 1,97° of Varus and radiolucent lines were detected in 43 knees (22,4%). The survival rate is 98.4% at 2 years and 97.4% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

At short-term follow-up the ATTUNE Knee Replacement System provide excellent clinical and radiographical outcomes and good results regarding revision rate. Due to high incidence of radiolucent lines, those patients should be closely monitored even though they show no clinical evidence for loosening.

Implant fracture of the Regenerex® modular metal tibial component: A report of three cases

BACKGROUND

Implant fractures are a very rare complication in primary total knee replacement (TKR) surgery and with modern implant designs and improved metals these events have nearly been eliminated. In this case series we report three cases of tibial metal baseplate fractures in uncemented Regenerex® TKR.

METHODS

Cases originated from a prospective case series of 80 patients operated between 2013 and 2016. Five patients were pilot cases and 75 were participants in a prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial that evaluated different adjuvant bone anti-resorptive medical therapies. All patients were treated with an uncemented press-fit Regenerex® Porous Titanium Construct tibial tray and matching cemented (Refobacin Bone Cement R) patella and femoral components (hybrid implant).

RESULTS

We report three cases of medial side metal baseplate fractures of a modular finned tibial stem. All three baseplate fractures were in male patients. Confirmed failure of the implant occurred after 10, 12 and 23 months, in situ, with a mean follow-up of 15 months (range 10-23).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current case series we cannot make any causal inferences. Failures may represent a multifactorial process with a cascade of events with implant failure as the result. However, like in most other case reports of metal failures in the literature, the implant fractures in this report were located on the medial side of the tibial component in male patients.

Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Affect Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component and Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Proposed aims of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are to improve accuracy of component alignment, while reducing blood loss and surgical time. The primary goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to verify whether PSI improves the rotational alignment of the femoral component in comparison to conventionally implanted TKA.

METHODS

One-hundred thirty-three consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility. Block randomization was performed to allocated patients in the treatment (PSI) or control group. During hospital stay, surgical times were recorded, and total blood volume loss and estimated red blood cell were calculated. Two months after surgery, a computed tomography of the knee was obtained to measure femoral component rotation to the transepicondylar axis and tibial component slope.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled. PSI did neither result in a significant improvement in femoral component rotation nor result in a reduction of outliers, as compared with conventional instrumentation. No significant improvement in terms of tibial slope, blood loss, total surgical time, and ischemia time could be identified. The number of tibial recuts required in the PSI group was significantly higher than in the control group (P = .0003).

CONCLUSION

PSI does not improve the accuracy of femoral component rotation in TKA in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Moreover, PSI did not appear to influence any of the other variables investigated as secondary goals by this study. The results of this study do not support its routine use during standard TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized, controlled trial.

Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study

Objectives

The Attune total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used in over 600 000 patients worldwide. Registry data show good clinical outcome; however, concerns over the cement-tibial interface have been reported. We used retrieval analysis to give further insight into this controversial topic.

Methods

We examined 12 titanium (Ti) PFC Sigma implants, eight cobalt-chromium (CoCr) PFC Sigma implants, eight cobalt-chromium PFC Sigma rotating platform (RP) implants, and 11 Attune implants. We used a peer-reviewed digital imaging method to quantify the amount of cement attached to the backside of each tibial tray. We then measured: 1) the size of tibial tray thickness, tray projections, peripheral lips, and undercuts; and 2) surface roughness (Ra) on the backside and keel of the trays. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate differences between the two designs.

Results

There was no evidence of cement attachment on any of the 11 Attune trays examined. There were significant differences between Ti and CoCr PFC Sigma implants and Attune designs (p < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference between CoCr PFC Sigma RP and Attune designs (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in the design features between the investigated designs (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The majority of the earliest PFC Sigma designs showed evidence of cement, while all of the retrieved Attune trays and the majority of the RP PFC trays in this study had no cement attached. This may be attributable to the design differences of these implants, in particular in relation to the cement pockets. Our results may help explain a controversial aspect related to cement attachment in a recently introduced TKA design.Cite this article: A. Cerquiglini, J. Henckel, H. Hothi, P. Allen, J. Lewis, A. Eskelinen, J. Skinner, M. T. Hirschmann, A. J. Hart. Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:136-145. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2.

Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty

Background

Aseptic loosening is one of the most elusive problems in total knee arthroplasty. We compared the failure rates of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty utilizing implants with hardened surface coating to a previous cohort of patients who underwent the procedure with traditional cruciate-retaining noncoated cobalt-chrome implants.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of 1099 total knee arthroplasties performed from 2009 to 2017. Two hundred forty-nine total knee arthroplasties performed from January 2015 to March 2017 under a single design were reviewed retrospectively and compared to the author’s previous 850 total knee arthroplasties performed from January 2009 to December 2014 under a different design.

Results

This series demonstrated an alarming debonding of cement in the tibial implant. The resultant failure rate of 6% (P < .001) is higher than observed in 850 total knee arthroplasties in the previous 5 years and higher than those reported in the literature giving cause for concern regarding this implant.

Conclusions

Due to the observed excessive failure rate, the authors recommend exercising high levels of caution using this implant with hardened surface treatment until further testing can be ascertained as to the root cause of failure.

Modern cemented total knee arthroplasty design shows a higher incidence of radiolucent lines compared to its predecessor

PURPOSE

To prevent early failure it is necessary to evaluate modern TKA system for possible shortcomings during implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic outcome and short-term survival of a modern cemented primary TKA system compared to its predecessor.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 529 primary cemented TKAs [276 Attune (ATT) and 253 PFC Sigma (PFC)], which were implanted between 2014 and 2017 concerning the radiographic outcome and short-term survival. Radiographs were taken before discharge, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Radiographic analysis was performed by two independent assessors using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System.

RESULTS

The incidence of radiolucent lines was significantly higher in the ATT group compared with the PFC group 12 months postoperatively (35.1%; n = 97 TKAs vs. 7.5%; n = 19 TKAs; p < 0.001). Survival analysis could not show any differences in revision-free survival or revision rate.

CONCLUSION

The modern primary TKA system shows an increased number of radiolucent lines, especially on the tibial component in this short-term analysis and may mostly be due to technique-related issues. Patients with those radiolucent lines even though they show no clinical evidence for loosening should be closely monitored at regular intervals. These findings are of vital clinical importance because surgeons should be aware of particular challenges in preparation and cementing technique once they are using this TKA-system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Trends in the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening remains the most common mode of failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although the risk of loosening is multifactorial, recent studies reported early failure via debonding at the tibial implant-cement interface and a potential association with high viscosity cement (HVC). The purpose of this study is to determine the type of cement used by surgeons performing elective, primary TKA in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using data reported to the American Joint Replacement Registry from 2012 to 2017. The primary variable assessed was the type of cement used in each primary TKA, categorized as HVC, medium viscosity cement, or low viscosity cement based on the manufacturer's specifications. The use of antibiotic-impregnated cement was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 554,935 primary TKA procedures were reviewed over the 7-year period. The use of HVC steadily increased from 46.0% of TKAs in 2012 to 61.3% of TKAs in 2017. Conversely, the use of low viscosity cement decreased in use from 47.9% of TKAs in 2012 to 30.9% in 2017. The percentage of TKAs performed using antibiotic-impregnated cement also decreased from 44.2% in 2012 to 34.5% in 2017.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the percentage of TKAs performed using HVC has continued to increase over the most recent 7 years for which the American Joint Replacement Registry has data. The risk of aseptic loosening is clearly multifactorial, but close monitoring is necessary to determine whether this change in surgeon preference will affect component survivorship.

Medial Tibial Periprosthetic Bone Resorption and Its Effect on Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cobalt-Chromium vs Titanium Implants

BACKGROUND

Recently, concerns arose over the medial tibial bone resorption of a novel cobalt-chromium implant. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tibial component material, design, and patient factors on periprosthetic bone resorption and at determining its association with clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A total of 462 primary TKAs using 5 types of implants were included. To evaluate tibial periprosthetic bone resorption, we assessed radiolucent lines and change in bone mineral density at the medial tibial condyle (BMD_MT). Factors related to bone resorption were assessed using regression analysis. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated with respect to periprosthetic bone resorption.

RESULTS

Compared to titanium implants, cobalt-chromium implants showed a higher incidence of complete radiolucent lines (23.1% vs 7.9% at 2 years post-TKA) and a greater degree of BMD_MT reduction. However, there was no significant difference between the implants made of the same material. Increased medial tibial bone resorption was associated with male sex, osteoporosis, larger preoperative varus deformity, longer follow-up period, and lower body mass index. The periprosthetic bone resorption was not associated with clinical outcomes including changes in range of motion and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. Furthermore, no cases warranted additional surgery.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic bone resorption was associated with implant material but not with implant design. Moreover, patient factors were related to the medial tibial bone resorption post-TKA. However, the periprosthetic bone resorption was not associated with short-term clinical outcomes. We contend that researchers should incorporate integrative considerations when developing and assessing novel implants.

Low Rates of Aseptic Tibial Loosening in Obese Patients With Use of High-Viscosity Cement and Standard Tibial Tray: 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty is overall a very successful surgery, but complications do occur. These complications include aseptic loosening of the tibial component, and obese patients are among the highest risk group. High-viscosity cement (HVC) has been implicated as a possible cause for aseptic loosening of the tibial component. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of aseptic loosening of the tibial component in obese patients with the use of HVC and standard tibial tray.

METHODS

We identified 1366 obese patients (1851 knees) with a body mass index >35 kg/m² and 2-year minimum follow-up who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using HVC and a symmetrical, grit-blasted, cobalt-chrome tibial component with 40-mm stem. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, Knee Society (KS) scores, complications, and reoperations were evaluated. Specifically, we assessed the rate of tibial aseptic loosening.

RESULTS

At a mean 5.4 years follow-up, only 1 in 1851 knees had aseptic loosening of the tibial component for an incidence of 0.054%. There was a mean increase of 3.3 degrees of knee range of motion. KS pain level decreased by 38.6 points (50 point scale). KS clinical scores improved by 52.2, Knee Society functional scores improved by 19.5, University of California, Los Angeles, activity score improved by 0.9, and Oxford Knee Score by 15.7. All these improvements were statistically significant with P < .001.

CONCLUSION

Standard tibial components and HVC can be used in most patients, including the high-risk obese group, with low rates of tibial aseptic loosening.