Differences in Post-Operative Outcome Between Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Predictors of Reoperation and Survival Experience (Minimum 1 Year) for Primary Versus Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA), including primary and conversion procedures, is commonly used for many types of joint disease in patients aged below 65 years, though few studies have evaluated THA outcomes in young patients (≤ 40 years old). This study examined a large cohort of patients who underwent THA at a young (≤ 40 years old) age to identify predictors of reoperation and compare survivorship between primary and conversion THAs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 497 patients who underwent 612 primary and conversion THAs at 40 years old or younger between 1990 and 2020. Medical records were reviewed to collect patient/surgical data. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors of reoperation, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests was used to compare survival curves by THA type.

RESULTS

The median age at surgery (interquartile range) was 31 years (25 to 36). The median follow-up time was 6.6 years (range, 3.8 to 10.5). Conversion THAs had an increased rate of both revisions (12.3 versus 5.6%, P = 0.02) and nonrevision reoperations (8.9 versus 3.2%, P = 0.03) compared to primary THAs. A ceramic-on-ceramic articulation (odds ratio: 5.17; P = 0.03) and a higher estimated blood loss (odds ratio: 1.0007; P = 0.03) were independent predictors of reoperation for primary and conversion THA, respectively. Conversion THAs had a lower 15-year survival (77.8 versus 90.8%, P = 0.009) compared to primary THAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients ≤ 40 years old who underwent primary and conversion THAs demonstrated an impressive 15-year survival comparable to that of older populations (74 to 93%), while conversion procedures had a higher reoperation rate. Although primary THA may be more ideal, there are promising outcomes for patients who need THA at a younger age than typically implemented, especially for those who are very young (≤ 30 years old).

Total hip arthroplasty following the failure of intertrochanteric nailing: First implant or salvage surgery?

BACKGROUND

Proximal femur fractures, including both intracapsular (femoral neck fractures) and extracapsular fractures (intertrochanteric femoral fractures, IFFs), affect around 1.5 million people per year worldwide. Mechanical failures of intertrochanteric nailing in IFFs could be managed with revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

AIM

To describe the surgical complexity and the procedure-related complication rates in patients with trochanteric nailing failure and treated with THA.

METHODS

Patients referred to our level I trauma center between April 2012 and July 2018 with failed cephalomedullary nailing following trochanteric fractures were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent a salvage surgical procedure, i.e., cephalomedullary nail removal and conversion to THA. The same surgical and anesthesiology team performed the surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-ups for at least 24 mo. Complications and re-operations were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria (male: 29; female: 45; mean age: 73.8-years-old; range: 65-89) and were included in the current study. The average operative time was 117 min (76-192 min). The average blood loss was 585 mL (430-1720 mL). Among the 74 patients, 43 (58.1%) required transfusion of three or more blood units. Two patients died within the 4th d after surgery because of pulmonary embolism, and 1 patient died 9 mo after surgery due to ischemic myocardial infarction. The complication rate in the 71 patients who completed the minimum 24-mo follow-up was 22.5%. In 3 cases out of 71 (4.2%) periprosthetic acetabular fracture was observed during the follow-up. One of these periacetabular fractures occurred intraoperatively. An intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture was observed in 5 patients out of 71 (7.0%). Four of these patients needed a re-operation to fix the fracture with plates and cerclages; in one of these patients, femoral stem revision was also necessary. In 4 patients out of 71 (5.6%), an early THA dislocation was observed, whereas in 1 case (1.4%) a late THA dislocation was observed. Three patients out of 71 (4.2%) developed a periprosthetic joint infection during the study follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that salvage options for IFF fixation failure are complex procedures with a relevant intraoperative and postoperative complication rate.

A Matched Comparison of the Rates of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often lower following conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) compared to matched primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) controls. However, the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for any PROMs are yet to be analyzed for cTHA. This study aimed to (1) determine if patients undergoing cTHA achieve primary THA-specific 1-year PROM MCIDs at comparable rates to matched controls undergoing primary THA and (2) establish 1-year MCID values for specific PROMs following cTHA.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted using 148 cases of cTHA which were matched 1:2 to 296 primary THA patients. Previously defined anchor values for 2 PROM measures in primary THA were used to compare cTHA to primary THA, while novel cTHA-specific MCID values for 2 PROMs were calculated through a distribution method. Predictors of achieving the MCID of PROMs were analyzed through multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Conversion THA was associated with decreased odds of achieving the primary THA-specific 1-year Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement PROM (Odds Ratio: 0.319, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.182-0.560, P < .001) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short-Form-10a PROM (Odds Ratio: 0.531, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.313-0.900, P = .019) MCIDs in reference to matched primary THA patients. Less than 60% of cTHA patients achieved an MCID. The 1-year MCID of the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short-Form-10a specific to cTHA were +10.71 and +4.68, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While cTHA is within the same diagnosis-related group as primary THA, patients undergoing cTHA have decreased odds of achieving 1-year MCIDs of primary THA-specific PROMs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Midterm Results of Contemporary Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 45 Years or Younger

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients has varying results, and some reports show inferior results when compared with those of older patients. This study evaluated the outcomes of contemporary uncemented THA in patients 45 years or younger. This was a retrospective review from 2003 to 2015 at an academic institution. Three hundred one uncemented THAs in 232 patients 45 years or younger were evaluated. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Ninety-day complications, survivorship free of revision, and dislocations were evaluated. Mean age was 35.7 years, 43.1% of patients were women, and mean follow-up was 9.3 years. Ninety-day complications included 26 emergency department visits, 11 readmissions, 3 revisions, and 3 dislocations. The rate of 10-year survivorship free of revision was 85.5%, and the rate of 10-year survivorship free of aseptic revision was 87.7%. Excluding metal-on-metal (MOM) THAs, 10-year aseptic survivorship was 93.3%. The most common reasons for revision were adverse local tissue reaction after MOM THA (16 hips) and periprosthetic joint infection (6 hips). In a multivariable logistic regression model, sickle cell disease (SCD) and conversion THA were associated with 90-day readmissions. Both MOM THA and SCD were associated with revision (P<.05). Patients who are 45 years or younger undergoing THA (excluding MOM articulation) had a rate of 10-year survival free of aseptic revision of 93.3%. At 9.3 years' mean follow-up, THA in young patients was associated with low revision rates with acceptable risk of prosthetic joint infection and dislocation. Patients with SCD are at increased risk for early readmission and revision at latest follow-up. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e45-e51.].

COVID-19 disruptions to elective postoperative care did not adversely affect early complications or patient reported outcomes of primary TKA

INTRODUCTION

Elective orthopedic care, including in-person office visits and physical therapy (PT), was halted on March 16, 2020, at a large, urban hospital at the onset of the local COVID-19 surge. Post-discharge care was provided predominantly through a virtual format. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative care disruptions on early total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes, specifically 90-day complications, 120-day rate of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional records were queried to identify 624 patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis and who were discharged home between 1/1/20 and 3/15/20. These patients were compared to 558 controls discharged between 1/1/19 and 3/15/2019. Cohort demographics and in-hospital characteristics were equivalent apart from inpatient morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption. Patient-reported access to PT (p < 0.001) and post-discharge care (p < 0.001) were worse among study patients. Study patients were prescribed fewer post-discharge PT sessions (19.8 vs. 23.5; p < 0.001) and utilized telehealth more frequently (p < 0.001). Mann-Whitney U, T, Fisher's Exact, and chi-squared tests were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-day CMS complications were lower among study patients (3.5% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.05). Rates of MUA were similar between groups. Study patients reported similar PROMs and marginally inferior VR-12 mental and LEAS functional outcomes at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Disruptions to elective orthopedic care in March 2020 seemed to have had no major consequences on clinical outcomes for TKA patients. Our findings question the usefulness of pre-pandemic post-discharge protocols, which may over-emphasize in-person visits and PT.

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Era of Bundled Care Payments: Impacts on Costs of Care

BACKGROUND

Conversion hip arthroplasty is defined as a patient who has had prior open or arthroscopic hip surgery with or without retained hardware that is removed and replaced with arthroplasty components. Currently, it is classified under the same diagnosis-related group as primary total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, it frequently requires a higher cost of care.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 228 conversion THA procedures in an orthopaedic specialty hospital was performed. Propensity score matching was used to compare the study group to a cohort of 510 primary THA patients by age, body mass index, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. These matched groups were compared based on total costs, implants used, operative times, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and complications.

RESULTS

Conversion THA incurred 25% more mean total costs compared to primary THA (P < .05), longer lengths of surgery (154 versus 122 minutes), and hospital LOS (2.1 versus 1.56 days). A subgroup analysis showed a 57% increased cost for cephalomedullary nail conversion, 34% increased cost for sliding hip screw, 33% for acetabular open reduction and internal fixation conversion, and 10% increased costs in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning conversions (all P < .05). There were 5 intraoperative complications in the conversion group versus none in the primary THA group (P < .01), with no statistically significant difference in readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Conversion THA is significantly more costly than primary THA and has longer surgical times and greater LOS. Specifically, conversion THA with retained implants had the greatest impact on cost.

Mortality and Complications Following Early Conversion Arthroplasty for Failed Hip Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture in older patients leads to high morbidity and mortality. Patients who are treated surgically but fail acutely face a more complex operation with conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated mortalities and complications in patients who experienced failure within one year following hip fracture surgery requiring conversion THA.

METHODS

Patients aged 60 years or more undergoing conversion THA within one year following intertrochanteric or femoral neck fracture were identified and propensity-matched to patients sustaining hip fractures treated surgically but not requiring conversion within the first year. Patients who had two-year follow-up (91 conversions; 247 comparisons) were analyzed for 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month mortalities, 90-day readmissions, surgical complications, and medical complications.

RESULTS

Nonunion and screw cutout were the most common indications for conversion THA. Mortalities were similar between groups at 6 months (7.7% conversion versus 6.1% nonconversion, P = .774), 12 months (11% conversion versus 12% nonconversion, P = .999), and 24 months (14% conversion versus 22% nonconversion, P = .163). Survivorships were similar between groups for the entire cohort and by fracture type. Conversion THA had a higher rate of 90-day readmissions (14% versus 3.2%, P = .001), and medical complications (17% versus 6.1%, P = .006). Inpatient and 90-day orthopaedic complications were similar.

CONCLUSION

Conversion THA for failed hip fracture surgery had comparable mortality rates to hip fracture surgery, with higher rates of perioperative medical complications and readmissions. Conversion THA following hip fracture represents a potential "second hit" that both surgeons and patients should be aware of with initial decision-making.

Conversion total hip arthroplasty for early failure following unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture: what can patients expect?

PURPOSE

To report surgical outcomes in patients treated with conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) for early failure of cephalomedullary nails (CMNs).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of CTHA for treatment of failed CMN within 1 year of initial surgery for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. The cohort was matched 1:5 to patients who underwent elective primary THA (PTHA). Patient demographics, mechanism of CMN failure, surgical outcomes, and complication rates were assessed.

RESULTS

22 patients met criteria with a mean time to failure of 145 days. Modes of failure included: lag screw cut-out with superior migration (9, 40.9%), or medialization (8, 36.4%), and aseptic nonunion with implant failure (2, 9.0%) and without implant failure (3, 13.6%). Fourteen of the patients (63.6%) had acetabular-sided damage secondary to lag screw penetration, all in the screw cut-out groups. Patient demographics were similar between cohorts. Compared to PTHA, CTHA patients had increased operative time, blood loss, LOS, and readmission rates. After IMN failure, the operative leg was shorter than the contralateral leg in all cases. CTHA restored leg lengths to <  = 10 mm in 15 (68.1%) of patients, with an average leg length discrepancy after CTHA of 6.7 mm. CTHA patients had increased rates of overall surgical complications and medical complications, specifically anemia (all p < 0.01). Tranexamic acid was used less often in the CTHA group (p < 0.01). Rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation, and revision were all higher in the CTHA, though did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The majority (77.3%) of CMN implant failure for nonunion within 1 year was due to screw cut-out. CTHA is a salvage option for early failed IT hip fracture repair, but expected surgical outcomes are more similar to revision THA than primary THA, with increased risk of readmission, longer surgery and LOS, increased blood loss, and higher complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective comparative study.

Conversion of failed internal fixation in proximal femur fractures using calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Reoperations for secondary osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis, or hardware failure following failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fracture (ITF) or femoral neck fracture (FNF) are common. An effective salvage treatment often involves complete removal of the hardware followed by total hip arthroplasty (THA). Almost no data are available regarding conversion to short-stem THA. This study aimed to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, potential complications, and the survival rate of short-stem THA following revision surgery.

METHODS

We investigated 27 patients who underwent conversion THA using a calcar-guided short stem. Patient-reported outcome measurements were obtained, including the Harris hip score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as pain and satisfaction on the visual analogue scale. Radiological follow-up was also performed.

RESULTS

We identified 18 (66.7%) patients diagnosed with FNF and 9 (33.3%) patients with ITF. Clinical and radiological outcomes were satisfactory at the last follow-up (30.56 ± 11.62 months). One patient required early revision surgery due to dislocation and greater trochanter fracture. At the last follow-up, none of the short stems required revision. No other major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Given the low rate of complications and 100% survival, our findings indicate that short stems for conversion THA due to failed internal fixation may be considered an option in a properly selected patient population. However, it should not be considered a standard procedure and should only be performed by experienced surgeons.

Outcome and technical consideration of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures: Are they really that different?

INTRODUCTION

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty (cTHA) is a rescue strategy for proximal femur osteosynthesis failures. However, it is unclear whether cTHAs performed for extra-capsular fracture fixation failures (ECF) or for intra-capsular fracture fixation failures (ICF) share the same complexity and efficacy. The purpose of our study was to compare cTHAs performed on pre-existing ICFs and pre-existing ECFs, focusing on surgical complications and functional outcomes in both groups.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study was conducted on cTHA patients, treated between 2014 and 2018, divided into 2 groups: ICF-group and ECF-group. The main outcomes were: type of implant used, duration of surgery, need for transfusions, incidence of complications, functional outcomes.

RESULTS

28 patients were included (15 in the ECF group and 13 in the ICF group); the average follow-up was of 31 ± 17.3 months. No significant differences were identified in terms of the type of implant used and duration of surgery. The number of transfused patients was 4 in the ICF group and 12 in the ECF group (p = 0.02); the average transfused units were 0.4 ± 0.7 in the ICF group and 1.3 ± 0.9 in the ECF group (p = 0.01). The incidence of complications - an infection and a dislocation, both of which occurred in the ICF group - and functional outcomes did not present significant differences.

CONCLUSION

The conversion surgery on ECFs patients is technically more difficult for the surgeon and prone to greater blood loss. The outcomes are satisfactory and overlap between the two groups.

A Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparison in FNF and OA Patients

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. Femoral neck fracture (FNF) and osteoarthritis (OA) are two of the medical conditions necessitating a hip replacement, most frequently carried out. The preoperative and postoperative pathways for patients suffering from these two diseases differ, yet worldwide, many national healthcare systems underestimate or misinterpret the (more than nuanced) care plan differences of the two. Factors and Criteria. Analyzed material was gathered from studies published between 2013 and 2019. Various strands of data demographics, comorbidities, and complications, as well as treatment outcomes, were tabulated to compare and contrast THA patients suffering from FNF and OA to collate their findings. Outcomes were cross-checked and validated for reliability and then were presented in a table format.

RESULTS

All five retrospective cohort studies fitted the required criteria for inclusion in this work, four US-based study groups and one European-based study group. Data were gathered from three separate databases. The "average" FNF patient is 76.8 years old. There was a 68.96% female probability. The "average" OA patient is 69.15 years old. There was a 5.24% female probability. 59.57% operated for athrosis, and only 34.63% operated for fracture which received grade lower than the third in the American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classification. There was more than 3 times higher prevalence of complications in the trauma group. FNF patients' hospitalization was approximately 3 days longer. On average, 3.7% of patients operated for trauma and 1.5% of patients with elective THA required a second surgery. 6.57% FNF and 2.93% OA patients had unplanned readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, patients who suffer a femoral neck fracture are an extremely fragile group. They require additional perioperative and postoperative care. To meet these desired expectations, more FNF cost-comprehensive systems need to be initiated.

Is Conversion TKA a Primary or Revision? Clinical Course and Complication Risks Approximating Revision TKA Rather Than Primary TKA

BACKGROUND

Conversion total knee arthroplasty (convTKA) is associated with increased resource utilization and costs compared with primary TKA. The purpose of this study is to compare 1) surgical time, 2) hospitalization length (LOS), 3) complications, 4) infection, and 5) readmissions in patients undergoing convTKA to both primary TKA and revision TKA patients.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2008 to 2018. Patients undergoing convTKA (n = 1,665, 0.5%) were defined by selecting Current Procedural Terminology codes 27,447 and 20,680. We compared the outcomes of interest to patients undergoing primary TKA (n = 348,624) and to patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA (n = 8213). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the relative risk of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Compared with patients undergoing primary TKA, convTKA patients were younger (P < .001), had lower body mass index (P < .001), and were less likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologist class III/IV (P < .001). These patients had significantly longer operative times (122.6 vs 90.3 min, P < .001), increased LOS (P < .001), increased risks for any complication (OR 1.94), surgical site infection (OR 1.84), reoperation (OR 2.18), and readmissions (OR 1.60) after controlling for confounders. Compared with aseptic TKA revisions, operative times were shorter (122.6 vs 148.2 min, P < .001), but LOS (2.91 vs 2.95 days, P = .698) was similar. Furthermore, relative risk for any complication (P = .350), surgical site infection (P = .964), reoperation (P = .296), and readmissions (P = .844) did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Conversion TKA procedures share more similarities with revision TKA rather than primary TKA procedures. Without a distinct procedural and diagnosis-related group, there are financial disincentives to care for these complex patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

How Does Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Compare to Primary?

BACKGROUND

Recent institutional evidence suggests that conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) incurs higher complication rates and costs when compared to primary THA. These findings contrast with the current reimbursement system as conversion and primary THAs are classified under the same diagnosis-related group. Thus, a national all-payer database was utilized to compare complication rates up to 2 years, 30-day readmission rates, and 90-day costs between conversion THA and matched primary THA patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the PearlDiver database between 2010 and second quarter of 2018 was performed using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to compare conversion THA (CPT 27132) to primary THA (CPT 27130). Patients were matched at a 1:3 ratio based on age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index, tobacco use, and diabetes (conversion = 8369; primary = 25,081 patients).

RESULTS

Conversion THA had higher rates of periprosthetic joint infections (conversion: 7.7% vs primary: 1.4%), hip dislocations (4.5% vs 2.0%), blood transfusions (2.0% vs 1.0%), mechanical complications (5.5% vs 1.0%), and revision surgeries (4.0% vs 1.5%) (P < .001 for all) by 90 days. The 30-day readmission rate for conversion THA was significantly higher compared to the primary group (7.3% vs 3.3%) (P < .001). Median cost at 90 days for conversion THA was significantly higher compared to primary THA ($18,800 vs $13,611, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed increased complication rates, revisions, readmissions, and costs among conversion THA patients compared to matched primary THA patients. These results support the reclassification of conversion into a diagnosis-related group separate from primary THA.

The majority of conversion total hip arthroplasties can be considered primary replacements - a matched cohort study

The success of conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) among primary THA and revision THA re- mains unclear. We hypothesized that most conversion THAss can be performed using primary implants and will have an uncomplicated post-operative course. Thirty-six patients (23 females, mean age 68,0y) who underwent conversion THA for failed interventions for proximal femur fractures in the period 2006-2018 were matched sequentially against patients of the same sex and age who underwent primary THA or revision THA. Data was collected on implants used, major complications, and mortality. PROMs used included the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, Harris Hip Score, Visual Analogue Scale and the EQ-5D Health Questionnaire. Seventy- two percent of patients who underwent conversion THA were treated with primary implants and never suffered from a major complication. PROMs were excellent for this group of patients. The distinction primary / conversion / revision THA could not explain differences in outcomes, however the necessity of using revision implants and the development of major complications could. The majority of conversion total hip arthroplasties can be considered a primary replacement. Predicting outcomes for THA should focus on patient frailty and technical difficulties dealing with infection, stability and loss of bone stock and should discard the conversion versus revision terminology.

The majority of conversion total hip arthroplasties can be considered a primary replacement: a matched cohort study

Background and study aims

The success of conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) among primary THA and revision THA remains unclear. We hypothesized that most conversion THA’s can be performed using primary implants and will have an uncomplicated post-operative course.

Materials and methods

Thirty-six patients (23 females, mean age 68,0y) who underwent conversion THA for failed interventions for proximal femur fractures in the period 2008–2018 were matched sequentially against patients of the same sex and age who underwent primary THA or revision THA. Data were collected on implants used, major complications, and mortality. PROMs used included the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, Harris Hip Score, Visual Analogue Scale and the EQ-5D Health Questionnaire.

Results

Seventy-two percent of patients who underwent conversion THA were treated with primary implants and never suffered from a major complication. PROMs were excellent for this group of patients. The distinction primary/conversion/revision THA could not explain differences in outcomes; however, the necessity of using revision implants and the development of major complications could.

Conclusions

The majority of conversion total hip arthroplasties can be considered a primary replacement. Predicting outcomes for THA should focus on patient frailty and technical difficulties dealing with infection, stability and loss of bone stock and should discard the conversion versus revision terminology.

Outcomes of Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty in Nonagenarians and Centenarians

BACKGROUND

Nonagenarians and centenarians are among the fastest growing demographics in the United States. Although consequent demand for joint replacement is projected to rise precipitously, outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) have seldom been studied in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing primary THA was established using the 2008-2017 American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program. Propensity scores were used to match 858 patients aged 90 or older to 858 patients aged 65-89, controlling for demographic factors and comorbidities. Thirty-day outcomes were compared between matched age cohorts using multiple regression modeling.

RESULTS

Statistically equivalent 30-day rates of surgical infection (P = .73), pneumonia (P = .39), deep venous thrombosis/thrombophlebitis (P = .55), pulmonary embolism (P = .69), stroke (P = .73), myocardial infarction (P = .44), cardiac arrest (P = .69), and sepsis (P = .77) were observed between matched age cohorts, although nonagenarians and centenarians were significantly more likely to experience urinary tract infection (2.8% vs 0.9%, P = .004). In addition, matched patients aged 90 or older were more likely to have longer hospital stays (3.52 vs 2.81 days, P < .001) and be discharged to a nonhome facility (75.4% vs 34.6%, P < .001) but were at no higher than 30-day risk of reoperation (P = .45), readmission (P = .23), or mortality (P = .59).

CONCLUSION

Overall, THA remains a safe and viable treatment modality beyond the ninth decade of life. Patient comorbidity profiles, rather than age, should principally guide shared clinical decision making.

Differential Use of Narcotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparative Matched Analysis Between Osteoarthritis and Femoral Neck Fracture

BACKGROUND

The United States is currently in an opioid epidemic as it consumes the majority of narcotic medications. The purpose of this investigation is to identify the incidence and risk factors for prolonged opioid usage following total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to hip fracture (Fx) or osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients undergoing THA from 2007 through the first quarter of 2017. Following a 3:1 match based on comorbidities and demographics, patients were divided into THA due to Fx (n = 1801) or OA (n = 5403). Preoperative and prolonged postoperative narcotic users were identified. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify demographics, comorbidities, or diagnoses as risk factors for prolonged opioid use and preoperative and postoperative opioid use as risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred ninety-four OA patients (33.2%) were prescribed narcotics preoperatively and 1655 patients (30.6%) were using narcotics postoperatively, while 418 Fx patients (23.2%) were prescribed narcotics preoperatively and 499 patients (27.7%) were using narcotics postoperatively. Diagnosis of Fx (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.72, P < .001) and preoperative narcotic use (OR 6.12, 95% CI 5.27-6.82, P < .001) were the most significant risk factors for prolonged postoperative narcotic use. Prolonged postoperative narcotic use was associated with increased infection, dislocation, and revision THA in both Fx and OA groups.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of femoral neck fracture and overall preoperative narcotic use were significant predictors of chronic postoperative opioid use. Patients with significant risk factors for opioid dependence should receive additional consultation and more prudent follow-up with regards to pain management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

Total hip arthroplasty following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation treated with a cephalomedullary nail

AIMS

Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be used as a salvage procedure when fixation fails in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications of THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent THA were identified from the 5% subset of Medicare Parts A/B between 2002 and 2015. A subgroup involving those with an intertrochanteric fracture that was treated using a CMN during the previous five years was identified and compared with the remaining patients who underwent THA. The length of stay (LOS) was compared using both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of infection, dislocation, revision, and re-admission was compared between the two groups, using multivariate analysis adjusted for demographic, hospital, and clinical factors.

RESULTS

The Medicare data yielded 56 522 patients who underwent primary THA, of whom 369 had previously been treated with a CMN. The percentage of THAs that were undertaken between 2002 and 2005 in patients who had previously been treated with a CMN (0.346%) more than doubled between 2012 and 2015 (0.781%). The CMN group tended to be older and female, and to have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and lower socioeconomic status. The mean LOS was 1.5 days longer (5.3 vs 3.8) in the CMN group (p < 0.0001). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the CMN group compared with the non-CMN group: infection (6.2% vs 2.6%), dislocation (8.1% vs 4.5%), revision (8.4% vs 4.3%), revision for infection (1.1% vs 0.37%), and revision for dislocation (2.2% vs 0.6%).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of conversion to THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN continues to increase. This occurs in elderly patients with increased comorbidities. There is a significantly increased risk of infection, dislocation, and LOS in these patients. Patients with failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN who require THA should be made aware of the increased risk of complications, and steps need to be taken to reduce this risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):91-96.

Poor outcomes for osteoporotic patients undergoing conversion total hip arthroplasty following prior failed dynamic hip screw fixation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

Objectives

This study was performed to compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) following prior failed InterTan nail (IT) fixation or dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation in Asian patients with osteoporotic intertrochanteric hip fractures (IHFs) and to clarify which implant tends to be more favourable for CTHA.

Methods

Records of consecutive Asian patients with osteoporosis who underwent conversion of failed primary unilateral IT or DHS fixation to THA from 2010 to 2013 were extracted from the comprehensive database of the China Pacific Insurance Company Ltd. All consecutive procedures were managed by high-volume surgeons. The primary endpoint was the clinical outcome. The secondary endpoint was the radiological outcome.

Results

In total, 447 Asian patients with osteoporotic IHFs (DHS, n = 223; IT, n = 224) were assessed during a median follow-up of 46 months (range, 39–53 months). The two groups showed a significant difference in the Harris hip score at final follow-up and in the orthopaedic complication rate (DHS, 20.2%; IT, 9.8%).

Conclusion

Conversion to THA following prior failed DHS fixation tends to be associated with poorer clinical and radiological outcomes in Asian patients with osteoporotic IHFs than that following prior failed IT fixation.