Sonication of Extracted Implants Improves Microbial Detection in Patients With Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections

Sonication protocols and their contributions to the microbiological diagnosis of implant-associated infections: a review of the current scenario

Addressing the existing problem in the microbiological diagnosis of infections associated with implants and the current debate about the real power of precision of sonicated fluid culture (SFC), the objective of this review is to describe the methodology and analyze and compare the results obtained in current studies on the subject. Furthermore, the present study also discusses and suggests the best parameters for performing sonication. A search was carried out for recent studies in the literature (2019-2023) that addressed this research topic. As a result, different sonication protocols were adopted in the studies analyzed, as expected, and consequently, there was significant variability between the results obtained regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the technique in relation to the traditional culture method (periprosthetic tissue culture - PTC). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus were identified as the main etiological agents by SFC and PTC, with SFC being important for the identification of pathogens of low virulence that are difficult to detect. Compared to chemical biofilm displacement methods, EDTA and DTT, SFC also produced variable results. In this context, this review provided an overview of the most current scenarios on the topic and theoretical support to improve sonication performance, especially with regard to sensitivity and specificity, by scoring the best parameters from various aspects, including sample collection, storage conditions, cultivation methods, microorganism identification techniques (both phenotypic and molecular) and the cutoff point for colony forming unit (CFU) counts. This study demonstrated the need for standardization of the technique and provided a theoretical basis for a sonication protocol that aims to achieve the highest levels of sensitivity and specificity for the reliable microbiological diagnosis of infections associated with implants and prosthetic devices, such as prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, practical application and additional complementary studies are still needed.

Evaluation of Sonicate Fluid Culture Cutoff Points for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis

Introduction

Implant sonication is useful for recovery of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) pathogens in culture, but exact cutoff points for definition of clinically significant sonicate fluid culture results vary from study to study. The aim of this study was to define ideal sonicate fluid culture cutoff points for PJI diagnosis.

Methods

Sonicate fluid cultures from hip and knee prosthesis components removed between February 2007 and December 2020 were studied. Prosthesis components were placed in solid containers in the operating room; in the clinical microbiology laboratory, 400 mL Ringer's solution was added, and containers subjected to vortexing, sonication and then vortexing, followed by centrifugation. Concentrated sonicate fluid was plated on aerobic and anaerobic solid media, and culture results reported semiquantitatively, as no growth, <20, 20-50, 51-100, or >100 CFU/10 mL sonicate fluid. Sonicate cultures from cement spacers and cultures yielding more than 1 microorganism were excluded. Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point was evaluated.

Results

A total of 1448 sonicate fluid cultures were evaluated, 68% from knees and 32% from hips. PJI was present in 644 (44%) cases. Sensitivity of sonicate culture was 75.0% at <20 CFU/10 mL, 55.3% at ≥20 CFU/10 mL, 46.9% at >51 CFU/10 mL, and 39.8% at >100 CFU/10 mL. Specificity was 78.2%, 99.8%, 100%, and 100%, at the 4 cutoff points, respectively.

Conclusions

A cutoff point for sonicate fluid culture positivity of ≥20 CFU/10 mL is suitable for PJI diagnosis.

Validity of a preoperative scoring system for surgical management of periprosthetic hip infection: one-stage vs. two-stage revision

INTRODUCTION

There are no widely accepted algorithms for determining optimal treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our study aimed to confirm the validity of a previously published scoring system in a larger number of patients to support a rational surgical treatment strategy for periprosthetic hip infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2001 and December 2020, we performed 155 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for PJI, with mean follow-up of 6 years. One-stage revision THA was performed in 56 hips and two-stage revision THA in 99 hips. Prosthesis survival from recurrent infection was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, using implant removal as the endpoint. The pre-operative scoring system (full score of 12 points), including 6 essential elements, was retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The 10-year survival rates were 98% for one-stage (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-100) and 87% (95% CI, 79-96) for two-stage revision THA. Multivariate Cox regression analysis provided a total preoperative score as an independent risk factor for implant removal (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.49; p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity at the cut-off of 4 points on the scoring system were 80% and 91%, respectively. The average score for one-stage revision THA in successful and failed cases were 8.9 and 6.0, and for two-stage revision THA were 6.5 and 3.9, respectively. We found significant differences between successful cases in one- and two-stage revision THA (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative scoring system was useful for managing PJI. One-stage revision THA is recommended in patients scoring ≥ 9 points, and meticulously performed two-stage revision THA is encouraged for patients scoring ≥ 4 points.

Chronic Expanding Hematoma With Progressive Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report

A 31-year-old man without any other medical history developed severe hip pain seven years after right primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiography revealed extensive progressive osteolysis around the cup and stem. Periprosthetic infections and adverse reactions to the metal debris were absent. Right revision THA was performed, and chronic expanding hematoma (CEH) was diagnosed based on a comprehensive assessment. CEH should be diagnosed early because progressive osteolysis may generate an extensive hematoma. Thus, it should be considered when progressive osteolysis of an unknown cause is encountered after THA.

Corynebacterium periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review of 52 cases at 2.5 years follow-up

INTRODUCTION

While large progress has been achieved in identifying and treating the most common pathogens involved in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), there remains limited knowledge on atypical pathogens such as Corynebacterium. For that reason, we analyzed infection and diagnostical characteristics, as well as treatment outcome in Corynebacterium PJI.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed based on a structured PubMed and Cochrane Library analysis using the PRISMA algorithm. The search was performed by 2 independent reviewers, and articles from 1960 to 2022 considered eligible for inclusion. Out of 370 search results, 12 studies were included for study synthesis.

RESULTS

In total, 52 cases of Corynebacterium PJI were identified (31 knees, 16 hips, 4 elbows, 1 shoulder). Mean age was 65 years, with 53% females, and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3.9. The most common species was Corynebacterium striatum in 37 cases (71%). Most patients were treated with two-stage exchange (40%), isolated irrigation and debridement (21%), and resection arthroplasty (19%). Mean duration of antibiotic treatment was 8.5 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, there were 18 reinfections (33%), and 39% were for Corynebacterium. Initial infection by Corynebacterium striatum species was predictive of reoperation (p = 0.035) and reinfection (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Corynebacterium PJI affects multimorbid and elderly patients, with one in three developing a reinfection at short term. Importantly, the relative majority of reinfections was for persistent Corynebacterium PJI.

The value of sonication in the differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic femoral and tibial shaft nonunion in comparison to conventional tissue culture and histopathology: a prospective multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND

Septic and aseptic nonunion require different therapeutic strategies. However, differential diagnosis is challenging, as low-grade infections and biofilm-bound bacteria often remain undetected. Therefore, the examination of biofilm on implants by sonication and the evaluation of its value for differentiating between femoral or tibial shaft septic and aseptic nonunion in comparison to tissue culture and histopathology was the focus of this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Osteosynthesis material for sonication and tissue samples for long-term culture and histopathologic examination from 53 patients with aseptic nonunion, 42 with septic nonunion and 32 with regular healed fractures were obtained during surgery. Sonication fluid was concentrated by membrane filtration and colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified after aerobic and anaerobic incubation. CFU cut-off values for differentiating between septic and aseptic nonunion or regular healers were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The performances of the different diagnostic methods were calculated using cross-tabulation.

RESULTS

The cut-off value for differentiating between septic and aseptic nonunion was ≥ 13.6 CFU/10 ml sonication fluid. With a sensitivity of 52% and a specificity of 93%, the diagnostic performance of membrane filtration was lower than that of tissue culture (69%, 96%) but higher than that of histopathology (14%, 87%). Considering two criteria for infection diagnosis, the sensitivity was similar for one tissue culture with the same pathogen in broth-cultured sonication fluid and two positive tissue cultures (55%). The combination of tissue culture and membrane-filtrated sonication fluid had a sensitivity of 50%, which increased up to 62% when using a lower CFU cut-off determined from regular healers. Furthermore, membrane filtration demonstrated a significantly higher polymicrobial detection rate compared to tissue culture and sonication fluid broth culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support a multimodal approach for the differential diagnosis of nonunion, with sonication demonstrating substantial usefulness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2 Trial registration DRKS00014657 (date of registration: 2018/04/26).

Diagnostic accuracy of sonication fluid cultures from prosthetic components in periprosthetic joint infection: an updated diagnostic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and has a significant impact on patients and the national healthcare system. To date, the diagnosis of PJI is still confronted with dilemmas. The present study investigated the validity of sonication fluid culture (SFC) for removing implants in the diagnosis of PJI after joint replacement.

METHODS

From database establishment to December 2020, relevant literature was retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers independently performed quality assessment and data extraction to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to evaluate the diagnostic value of overall SFC for PJI.

RESULTS

A total of 38 eligible studies including 6302 patients were selected in this study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of SFC for PJI diagnosis were 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.79), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.96), 18.68 (95% CI, 11.92-29.28), 0.24 (95% CI, 0.21-0.29), and 85.65 (95% CI, 56.46-129.94), respectively, while the AUC was 0.92.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that SFC was of great value in PJI diagnosis, and the evidence of SFC on PJI was more favorable but not yet strong. Therefore, improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of SFC is still necessary, and the diagnosis of PJI continues to warrant a multiplex approach before and during a revision procedure.

Inoculation of sonicate fluid into blood culture bottles improves microbial detection in patients with orthopedic bone and soft tissue infections of the upper and lower extremities

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of sonicate fluid culture for biological tissues in orthopedic bone and soft tissue infections have not been reported. We assessed whether inoculating the sonicate fluid of bone and soft tissue into a blood culture bottle could increase the diagnostic accuracy for biofilm-related orthopedic infections.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with infections (9 purulent arthritis, 4 osteomyelitis, 4 purulent tenosynovitis, 2 purulent bursitis, and 1 cellulitis) and 10 non-infected cases (6 carpal tunnel syndrome, 3 Dupuytren contracture, and 1 soft tissue tumor) between October 2018 and December 2020 were evaluated prospectively. We analyzed a total of 107 culture submissions (87 bone and tissue specimens and 20 controls); 42 intraoperative tissue specimens (32 infected samples and 10 non-infected samples) using the conventional method, 45 sonication samples (35 infected samples and 10 non-infected samples), and 20 control samples. Intraoperative infectious tissues were cultured using sonicate fluid culture in a blood culture bottle (SFC-CB). The applications of SFC-CB and the conventional culture method and the detection rate, sensitivity, and relationship between the sensitivity of the diagnostic methods and duration of administered preoperative antibiotics were assessed.

RESULTS

The causative microorganism was detected only by SFC-CB in five patients (25%). The sensitivity (85% vs. 60%; P = 0.077) and detection rate (80% vs. 60%; P = 0.065) were higher for SFC-CB than for the conventional culture method. The sensitivity of SFC-CB was significantly higher than that of the conventional culture method in cases in which preoperative antibiotics were administered for more than 1 week (77% vs. 39%; P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Using SFC-CB, the diagnostic accuracy for bone and soft tissue infection was significantly improved. As biofilms are readily formed in biological tissues, sonication may also be useful for diagnosis. SFC-CB was particularly useful for cases in which preoperative antibiotics were administered.

Induction of Viable but Non-Culturable State in Clinically Relevant Staphylococci and Their Detection with Bacteriophage K

Prosthetic joint infections are frequently associated with biofilm formation and the presence of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria. Conventional sample culturing remains the gold standard for microbiological diagnosis. However, VBNC bacteria lack the ability to grow on routine culture medium, leading to culture-negative results. Bacteriophages are viruses that specifically recognize and infect bacteria. In this study, we wanted to determine if bacteriophages could be used to detect VBNC bacteria. Four staphylococcal strains were cultured for biofilm formation and transferred to low-nutrient media with different gentamycin concentrations for VBNC state induction. VBNC bacteria were confirmed with the BacLight^TM viability kit staining. Suspensions of live, dead, and VBNC bacteria were incubated with bacteriophage K and assessed in a qPCR for their detection. The VBNC state was successfully induced 8 to 19 days after incubation under stressful conditions. In total, 6.1 to 23.9% of bacteria were confirmed alive while not growing on conventional culturing media. During the qPCR assay, live bacterial suspensions showed a substantial increase in phage DNA. No detection was observed in dead bacteria or phage non-susceptible E. coli suspensions. However, a reduction in phage DNA in VBNC bacterial suspensions was observed, which confirmed the detection was successful based on the adsorption of phages.

Direct detection of microorganisms in sonicated orthopedic devices after in vitro biofilm production and different processing conditions

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for microbial detection in prosthetic joint infections is the multiple culture of the peri-prosthetic tissue. The fluid cultures after sonication can improve the recovery of the microorganisms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sonication technique with a plastic bag and the effect of refrigeration on microorganism detection with conventional culturing, MALDI-TOF MS and qPCR assay on an orthopedic screw model.

METHODS

We produced biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on orthopedic screws, which were stored under different conditions and temperatures before sonication. After sonication, the mass spectrometry by MALDI-TOF, qPCR and culture protocols was performed using the sonicated fluid, for detecting the microorganisms involved in the biofilm.

RESULTS

The bacterial bioburden decreased by approximately one log after the refrigeration period, in the screws containing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms. All the microorganisms involved in the screw biofilms were detected with MALDI-TOF and qPCR. Significant reductions in CFU counts occurred only in groups stored in the plastic bag, indicating that changes in temperature and humidity may favor cell death. However, this variation is not important for this model as it did not affect the detection owing to the high counts obtained.

CONCLUSION

Microbial identification by MALDI-TOF in sonicated fluid is feasible. With qPCR, there were no differences between the detection in the screws processed immediately or after refrigeration. It is necessary to consider whether or not the refrigeration period would affect microbial recovery in an explanted prosthesis.

Sonication of retrieved implants improves sensitivity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

Sonication is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, conditions and definition criteria for PJI vary among studies. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance (i.e., specificity, sensitivity) of sonicate fluid culture (SFC) against periprosthetic tissue culture (PTC), when using European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria.

METHODS

From March 2017 to April 2018, 257 implants were submitted for sonication. PJI was defined according to the EBJIS criteria as well as according to the International Consensus Meeting criteria of 2018 (ICM 2018). Only cases with at least one corresponding tissue sample were included. Samples were cultured using traditional microbiological plating techniques. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using two-by-two contingency tables. McNemar's test was used to compare proportions among paired samples. Subgroup analysis was performed dividing the cohort according to the site of PJI, previous antibiotic treatment, and time of manifestation. Prevalence of pathogens was determined for all patients as well as for specific subgroups.

RESULTS

Among the 257 cases, 145 and 112 were defined as PJI and aseptic failure, respectively. When using the EBJIS criteria, the sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 69.0 and 62.8%, respectively (p = .04). Meanwhile, the specificity was 90.2 and 92.9%, respectively (p = .65). When adopting ICM 2018 criteria, the sensitivity of SFC and PTC was 87.5 and 84.4% (p = .63) respectively, while the specificity was 85.1 and 92.5% (p = .05), respectively. The most commonly identified pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (26% overall), while 31% of PJI were culture-negative and 9% polymicrobial.

CONCLUSIONS

SFC exhibited significantly greater sensitivity versus PTC when using the EBJIS criteria. Nevertheless, the diagnosis of PJI remains a difficult challenge and different diagnostic tools are necessary to optimize the outcome.

Linezolid versus daptomycin treatment for periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Linezolid (LZD) and daptomycin (DAP) are predominantly used to target gram-positive pathogens; however, treatment effectiveness and adverse reactions for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse reactions of LZD and DAP for PJIs.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 82 patients between June 2009 and December 2017, to compare the effectiveness of LZD (group L, n = 39) and DAP (group D, n = 43) for treatment of PJIs harboring gram-positive microorganisms. Surgical options used with LZD or DAP therapy included implant retention, implant removal, and a shift to another appropriate antibiotic. Infection control was defined as not requiring implant removal after the final treatment.

RESULTS

Gram-positive pathogens were isolated from 72% of group L and 70% of group D patients, respectively. Whole infection control rates against gram-positive pathogens in groups L and D were 79% and 77%, respectively. Furthermore, infection control rates were 94% and 58% in group L and 75% and 80% in group D, without and with implant removal, respectively. Significantly higher clinical success rates and lower adverse event rates were observed in group D, including higher red blood cell and platelet counts and lower C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the effectiveness of LZD and DAP was equivalent in terms of infection control rates for refractory PJIs with gram-positive pathogens, DAP therapy significantly decreased CRP levels and caused fewer adverse events than LZD treatment.