Augmented Reality for Acetabular Component Placement in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Feasibility and Usability of Augmented Reality Technology in the Orthopaedic Operating Room

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Augmented reality (AR) has gained popularity in various sectors, including gaming, entertainment, and healthcare. The desire for improved surgical navigation within orthopaedic surgery has led to the evaluation of the feasibility and usability of AR in the operating room (OR). However, the safe and effective use of AR technology in the OR necessitates a proper understanding of its capabilities and limitations. This review aims to describe the fundamental elements of AR, highlight limitations for use within the field of orthopaedic surgery, and discuss potential areas for development.

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, studies have demonstrated evidence that AR technology can be used to enhance navigation and performance in orthopaedic procedures. General hardware and software limitations of the technology include the registration process, ergonomics, and battery life. Other limitations are related to the human response factors such as inattentional blindness, which may lead to the inability to see complications within the surgical field. Furthermore, the prolonged use of AR can cause eye strain and headache due to phenomena such as the vergence-convergence conflict. AR technology may prove to be a better alternative to current orthopaedic surgery navigation systems. However, the current limitations should be mitigated to further improve the feasibility and usability of AR in the OR setting. It is important for both non-clinicians and clinicians to work in conjunction to guide the development of future iterations of AR technology and its implementation into the OR workflow.

Development of Augmented Reality Vision for Osteosynthesis Using a 3D Camera

BACKGROUND

We developed a 3D camera system to track motion in a surgical field. This system has the potential to introduce augmented reality (AR) systems non-invasively, eliminating the need for the invasive AR markers conventionally required. The present study was performed to verify the real-time tracking accuracy of this system, assess the feasibility of integrating this system into the surgical workflow, and establish its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of orthopedic procedures.

METHODS

To evaluate the accuracy of AR technology using a 3D camera, a forearm bone model was created. The forearm model was depicted using a 3D camera, and its accuracy was verified in terms of the positional relationship with a 3D bone model created from previously imaged CT data. Images of the surgical field (capturing the actual forearm) were taken and saved in nine poses by rotating the forearm from pronation to supination. The alignment of the reference points was computed at the three points of CT versus the three points of the 3D camera, yielding a 3D rotation matrix representing the positional relationship. In the original system, a stereo vision-based 3D camera, with a depth image resolution of 1280×720 pixels, 30 frames per second, and a lens field of view of 64 specifications, with a baseline of 3 cm, capable of optimally acquiring real-time 3D data at a distance of 40-60 cm from the subject was used. In the modified system, the following modifications were made to improve tracking performance: (1) color filter processing was changed from HSV to RGB, (2) positional detection accuracy was modified with supporting marker sizes of 8 mm in diameter, and (3) the detection of marker positions was stabilized by calculating the marker position for each frame. Tracking accuracy was examined with the original system and modified system for the following parameters: differences in the rotation matrix, maximum and minimum inter-reference point errors between CT-based and camera-based 3D data, and the average error for the three reference points.

RESULTS

In the original system, the average difference in rotation matrices was 5.51±2.68 mm. Average minimum and maximum errors were 1.10±0.61 and 15.53±12.51 mm, respectively. The average error of reference points was 6.26±4.49 mm. In the modified system, the average difference in rotation matrices was 4.22±1.73 mm. Average minimum and maximum errors were 0.79±0.49 and 1.94±0.87 mm, respectively. The average error of reference points was 1.41±0.58 mm. In the original system, once tracking failed, it was difficult to recover tracking accuracy. This resulted in a large maximum error in supination positions. These issues were resolved by the modified system. Significant improvements were achieved in maximum errors and average errors using the modified system (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

AR technology using a 3D camera was developed. This system allows direct comparisons of 3D data from preoperative CT scans with 3D data acquired from the surgical field using a 3D camera. This method has the advantage of introducing AR into the surgical field without invasive markers.

Mixed Reality Navigation in Hip Fusion Conversion: A Novel Utilization of Advanced Technology: A Case Report

CASE

A 32-year-old woman with a history of hip fusion presented with significant lower back, hip, and knee pain as well as severely limited hip mobility and function. Single-stage fusion takedown and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed using augmented reality navigation. At 1 year, the patient was pain free with improved function. This study is the first to report the technique and outcomes of surgical fusion conversion to THA, using mixed reality navigation.

CONCLUSION

Mixed reality navigation in complex conversion THA can be useful for identifying the patient's true acetabulum and for patient-specific acetabular component placement to maximize outcomes.

Augmented reality-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended reality (XR), including virtual reality, augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality, has been used to help achieve accurate acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to compare the differences between XR-assisted and conventional THA.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from inception to September 10, 2023. The outcomes were accuracy of inclination and anteversion, duration of surgery, and intraoperative blood loss. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of five studies with 396 patients were included in our study. The pooled results indicated AR-assisted THA had better accuracy of inclination and anteversion than conventional THA (SMD = - 0.51, 95% CI [- 0.96 to - 0.07], P = 0.02; SMD = - 0.96, 95% CI [- 1.19 to - 0.72], P < 0.00001), but duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that AR-assisted THA had better accuracy of inclination and anteversion than conventional THA, but the duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss were similar in the two groups. Based on the pooled results, we suggested that AR can provide more precise acetabular cup placement than conventional methods in THA.

Exposure to Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence-Based Manifestations: A Primer on the Future of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Software-infused services, from robot-assisted and wearable technologies to artificial intelligence (AI)-laden analytics, continue to augment clinical orthopaedics - namely hip and knee arthroplasty. Extended reality (XR) tools, which encompass augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality technology, represent a new frontier for expanding surgical horizons to maximize technical education, expertise, and execution. The purpose of this review is to critically detail and evaluate the recent developments surrounding XR in the field of hip and knee arthroplasty and to address potential future applications as they relate to AI.

METHODS

In this narrative review surrounding XR, we discuss (1) definitions, (2) techniques, (3) studies, (4) current applications, and (5) future directions. We highlight XR subsets (augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality) as they relate to AI in the increasingly digitized ecosystem within hip and knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

A narrative review of the XR orthopaedic ecosystem with respect to XR developments is summarized with specific emphasis on hip and knee arthroplasty. The XR as a tool for education, preoperative planning, and surgical execution is discussed with future applications dependent upon AI to potentially obviate the need for robotic assistance and preoperative advanced imaging without sacrificing accuracy.

CONCLUSION

In a field where exposure is critical to clinical success, XR represents a novel stand-alone software-infused service that optimizes technical education, execution, and expertise but necessitates integration with AI and previously validated software solutions to offer opportunities that improve surgical precision with or without the use of robotics and computed tomography-based imaging.

The Accuracy and Absolute Reliability of a Knee Surgery Assistance System Based on ArUco-Type Sensors

Recent advances allow the use of Augmented Reality (AR) for many medical procedures. AR via optical navigators to aid various knee surgery techniques (e.g., femoral and tibial osteotomies, ligament reconstructions or menisci transplants) is becoming increasingly frequent. Accuracy in these procedures is essential, but evaluations of this technology still need to be made. Our study aimed to evaluate the system's accuracy using an in vitro protocol. We hypothesised that the system's accuracy was equal to or less than 1 mm and 1° for distance and angular measurements, respectively. Our research was an in vitro laboratory with a 316 L steel model. Absolute reliability was assessed according to the Hopkins criteria by seven independent evaluators. Each observer measured the thirty palpation points and the trademarks to acquire direct angular measurements on three occasions separated by at least two weeks. The system's accuracy in assessing distances had a mean error of 1.203 mm and an uncertainty of 2.062, and for the angular values, a mean error of 0.778° and an uncertainty of 1.438. The intraclass correlation coefficient was for all intra-observer and inter-observers, almost perfect or perfect. The mean error for the distance's determination was statistically larger than 1 mm (1.203 mm) but with a trivial effect size. The mean error assessing angular values was statistically less than 1°. Our results are similar to those published by other authors in accuracy analyses of AR systems.

Accuracy of Personalized Computed Tomographic 3D Templating for Acetabular Cup Placement in Revision Arthroplasty

Background: Revision hip arthroplasty presents a surgical challenge, necessitating meticulous preoperative planning to avert complications like periprosthetic fractures and aseptic loosening. Historically, assessment of the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has focused exclusively on primary hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined the accuracy of 3D templating for acetabular revision cups in 30 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Utilizing computed tomography scans of the patients' pelvis and 3D templates of the implants (Aesculap Plasmafit, B. Braun; Aesculap Plasmafit Revision, B. Braun; Avantage Acetabular System, Zimmerbiomet, EcoFit 2M, Implantcast; Tritanium Revision, Stryker), we performed 3D templating and positioned the acetabular cup implants accordingly. To evaluate accuracy, we compared the planned sizes of the acetabular cups in 2D and 3D with the sizes implanted during surgery. Results: An analysis was performed to examine potential influences on templating accuracy, specifically considering factors such as gender and body mass index (BMI). Significant statistical differences (p < 0.001) in the accuracy of size prediction were observed between 3D and 2D templating. Personalized 3D templating exhibited an accuracy rate of 66.7% for the correct prediction of the size of the acetabular cup, while 2D templating achieved an exact size prediction in only 26.7% of cases. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2D and 3D templating methods regarding gender or BMI. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 3D templating improves the accuracy of predicting acetabular cup sizes in revision arthroplasty when compared to 2D templating. However, it should be noted that the predicted implant size generated through 3D templating tended to overestimate the implanted implant size by an average of 1.3 sizes.

Comparison of the Accuracy of 2D and 3D Templating for Revision Total Hip Replacement

Introduction: Revision hip arthroplasty is a challenging surgical procedure, especially in cases of advanced acetabular bone loss. Accurate preoperative planning can prevent complications such as periprosthetic fractures or aseptic loosening. To date, the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has been evaluated only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the accuracy of 3D personalized planning of reinforcement cages (Burch Schneider) in 27 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty. Personalized 3D modeling and positioning of the reinforcement cages were performed using computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis of each patient and 3D templates of the implant. To evaluate accuracy, the sizes of the reinforcement cages planned in 2D and 3D were compared with the sizes of the finally implanted cages. Factors that may potentially influence planning accuracy such as gender and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed. Results: There was a significant difference (p = 0.003) in the accuracy of correct size prediction between personalized 3D templating and 2D templating. Personalized 3D templating predicted the exact size of the reinforcement cage in 96.3% of the patients, while the exact size was predicted in only 55.6% by 2D templating. Regarding gender and BMI, no statistically significant differences in planning accuracy either for 2D or 3D templating were observed. Conclusion: Personalized 3D planning of revision hip arthroplasty using Burch Schneider reinforcement cages leads to greater accuracy in the prediction of the required size of implants than conventional 2D templating.

The impact of extended reality on surgery: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Extended reality (XR) is defined as a spectrum of technologies that range from purely virtual environments to enhanced real-world environments. In the past two decades, XR-assisted surgery has seen an increase in its use and also in research and development. This scoping review aims to map out the historical trends in these technologies and their future prospects, with an emphasis on the reported outcomes and ethical considerations on the use of these technologies.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase for literature related to XR-assisted surgery and telesurgery was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Primary studies, peer-reviewed articles that described procedures performed by surgeons on human subjects and cadavers, as well as studies describing general surgical education, were included. Non-surgical procedures, bedside procedures, veterinary procedures, procedures performed by medical students, and review articles were excluded. Studies were classified into the following categories: impact on surgery (pre-operative planning and intra-operative navigation/guidance), impact on the patient (pain and anxiety), and impact on the surgeon (surgical training and surgeon confidence).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight studies were included for analysis. Thirty-one studies investigated the use of XR for pre-operative planning concluded that virtual reality (VR) enhanced the surgeon's spatial awareness of important anatomical landmarks. This leads to shorter operating sessions and decreases surgical insult. Forty-nine studies explored the use of XR for intra-operative planning. They noted that augmented reality (AR) headsets highlight key landmarks, as well as important structures to avoid, which lowers the chance of accidental surgical trauma. Eleven studies investigated patients' pain and noted that VR is able to generate a meditative state. This is beneficial for patients, as it reduces the need for analgesics. Ten studies commented on patient anxiety, suggesting that VR is unsuccessful at altering patients' physiological parameters such as mean arterial blood pressure or cortisol levels. Sixty studies investigated surgical training whilst seven studies suggested that the use of XR-assisted technology increased surgeon confidence.

CONCLUSION

The growth of XR-assisted surgery is driven by advances in hardware and software. Whilst augmented virtuality and mixed reality are underexplored, the use of VR is growing especially in the fields of surgical training and pre-operative planning. Real-time intra-operative guidance is key for surgical precision, which is being supplemented with AR technology. XR-assisted surgery is likely to undertake a greater role in the near future, given the effect of COVID-19 limiting physical presence and the increasing complexity of surgical procedures.

The effectiveness of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality training in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended reality (XR), including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), has been used in the training of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aims to examine the effectiveness of XR training in THA.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to September 2022 for eligible studies. The Review Manager 5.4 software was applied to compare accuracy of inclination and anteversion, and surgical duration between XR training and conventional methods.

RESULTS

We identified 213 articles, of which 4 randomized clinical trials and 1 prospective controlled study including 106 participants met inclusion criteria. The pooled data indicated the XR training had better accuracy of inclination and shorter surgical duration than conventional methods (MD = -2.07, 95% CI [- 4.02 to -0.11], P = 0.04; SMD = -1.30, 95% CI [- 2.01 to -0.60], P = 0.0003), but the accuracy of anteversion was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found XR training had better accuracy of inclination and shorter surgical duration than conventional methods in THA, but the accuracy of anteversion was similar. Based on the pooled results, we suggested that XR training can better improve trainees' surgical skills than conventional methods in THA.

Clinical applications of augmented reality in orthopaedic surgery: a comprehensive narrative review

PURPOSE

The development of augmented reality (AR) technology allows orthopaedic surgeons to incorporate and visualize surgical data, assisting the execution of both routine and complex surgical operations. Uniquely, AR technology allows a surgeon to view the surgical field and superimpose peri-operative imaging, anatomical landmarks, navigation guidance, and more, all in one view without the need for conjugate gaze between multiple screens. The aim of this literature review was to introduce the fundamental requirements for an augmented reality system and to assess the current applications, outcomes, and potential limitations to this technology.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Embase databases, by two independent reviewers, who then collaboratively synthesized and collated the results of the literature search into a narrative review focused on the applications of augmented reality in major orthopaedic sub-specialties.

RESULTS

Current technology requires that pre-operative patient data be acquired, and AR-compatible models constructed. Intra-operatively, to produce manipulatable virtual images into the user's view in real time, four major components are required including a camera, computer image processing technology, tracking tools, and an output screen. The user is provided with a heads-up display, which is a transparent display, enabling the user to look at both their natural view and the computer-generated images. Currently, high-quality evidence for clinical implementation of AR technology in the orthopaedic surgery operating room is lacking; however, growing in vitro literature highlights a multitude of potential applications, including increasing operative accuracy, improved biomechanical angular and alignment parameters, and potentially reduced operative time.

CONCLUSION

While the application of AR systems in surgery is currently in its infancy, we anticipate rapid and widespread implementation of this technology in various orthopaedic sub-specialties.

Physical and Mental Demand During Total Hip Arthroplasty

This study compared differences in (1) task duration; (2) biometric parameters (ie, caloric energy expenditure, heart rate); and (3) subjective measures of mental as well as physical demand of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and manual THA. A total of 12 THAs were performed on 6 cadaveric specimens by two surgeons using a wearable technology to track biometric parameters and taking a questionnaire to compare the physical and mental demands. The results of our study suggest that as compared with manual techniques, robotic assistance for THA may reduce mental and physical fatigue.

From Diagnosis to Therapy: The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

By reducing procedure-related problems, advancements in computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and surgical training aim to boost operative precision and enhance patient safety. Orthopaedic training and practice have started to change as a result of the incorporation of reality technologies like virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) into CAS. Today's trainees can engage in realistic and highly involved operational simulations without supervision. With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a greater need for breakthrough technology adoption. VR is an interactive technology that enables personalised care and could support successful patient-centered rehabilitation. It is a valid and trustworthy evaluation method for determining joint range of motion, function, and balance in physical rehabilitation. It may make it possible to customise care, encourage patients, boost compliance, and track their advancement. AR supplementation in orthopaedic surgery has shown promising results in pre-clinical settings, with improvements in surgical accuracy and reproducibility, decreased operating times, and less radiation exposure. As little patient observation is needed, this may lessen the workload clinicians must bear. The ability to use it for home-based therapy is often available commercially as well.

The objectives of this review are to evaluate the technology available, comprehend the available evidence regarding the benefit, and take into account implementation problems in clinical practice. The use of this technology, its practical and moral ramifications, and how it will affect orthopaedic doctors and their patients are also covered. This review offers a current and thorough analysis of the reality technologies and their uses in orthopaedic surgery.

Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Surgery and Its Application in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

The development of augmented reality (AR) and its application in total joint arthroplasty aims at improving the accuracy and precision in implant components’ positioning, hopefully leading to increased outcomes and survivorship. However, this field is far from being thoroughly explored. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature in order to examine the application, the results, and the different AR systems available in TJA. A systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for English articles on the application of augmented reality in total joint arthroplasty using various combinations of keywords since the inception of the database to 31 March 2022. Accuracy was intended as the mean error from the targeted positioning angle and compared as mean values and standard deviations. In all, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, four studies reported on the application of AR in total knee arthroplasty, six studies on total hip arthroplasty, three studies reported on reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and one study on total elbow arthroplasty. Nine of the included studies were preclinical (sawbones or cadaveric), while five of them reported results of AR’s clinical application. The main common feature was the high accuracy and precision when implant positioning was compared with preoperative targeted angles with errors ≤2 mm and/or ≤2°. Despite the promising results in terms of increased accuracy and precision, this technology is far from being widely adopted in daily clinical practice. However, the recent exponential growth in machine learning techniques and technologies may eventually lead to the resolution of the ongoing limitations including depth perception and their high complexity, favorably encouraging the widespread usage of AR systems.

Augmented Reality in Arthroplasty: An Overview of Clinical Applications, Benefits, and Limitations

Augmented reality (AR) is a natural extension of computer-assisted surgery whereby a computer-generated image is superimposed on the surgeon's field of vision to assist in the planning and execution of the procedure. This emerging technology shows great potential in the field of arthroplasty, improving efficiency, limb alignment, and implant position. AR has shown the capacity to build on computer navigation systems while providing more elaborate information in a streamlined workflow to the user. This review investigates the current uses of AR in the field of arthroplasty and discusses outcomes, limitations, and potential future directions.

Augmented Reality: Mapping Methods and Tools for Enhancing the Human Role in Healthcare HMI

Background: Augmented Reality (AR) represents an innovative technology to improve data visualization and strengthen the human perception. Among Human–Machine Interaction (HMI), medicine can benefit most from the adoption of these digital technologies. In this perspective, the literature on orthopedic surgery techniques based on AR was evaluated, focusing on identifying the limitations and challenges of AR-based healthcare applications, to support the research and the development of further studies. Methods: Studies published from January 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed after a comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Wiley Online Library databases. In order to improve the review reporting, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Results: Authors selected sixty-two articles meeting the inclusion criteria, which were categorized according to the purpose of the study (intraoperative, training, rehabilitation) and according to the surgical procedure used. Conclusions: AR has the potential to improve orthopedic training and practice by providing an increasingly human-centered clinical approach. Further research can be addressed by this review to cover problems related to hardware limitations, lack of accurate registration and tracking systems, and absence of security protocols.

Mixed Reality Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Updated Review With a Preliminary Case Report

Background

Augmented reality and mixed reality have been used to help surgeons perform complex surgeries. With the development of technology, mixed reality (MR) technology has been used to improve the success rate of complex hip arthroplasty due to its unique advantages. At present, there are few reports on the application of MR technology in total knee arthroplasty. We presented a case of total knee arthroplasty with the help of mixed reality technology.

Case Presentation

We presented a case of a 71-year-old woman who was diagnosed with bilateral knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity, especially on the right side. After admission, the right total knee arthroplasty was performed with the assistance of MR technology. Before the operation, the three-dimensional virtual model of the knee joint of the patient was reconstructed for condition analysis, operation plan formulation, and operation simulation. During the operation, the three-dimensional virtual images of the femur and tibia coincided with the real body of the patient, showing the osteotomy plane designed before the operation, which can accurately guide the completion of osteotomy and prosthesis implantation.

Conclusions

As far as we know, this is the first report on total knee arthroplasty under the guidance of mixed reality technology.

Augmented Reality (AR) in Orthopedics: Current Applications and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Imaging technologies (X-ray, CT, MRI, and ultrasound) have revolutionized orthopedic surgery, allowing for the more efficient diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of musculoskeletal aliments. The current review investigates recent literature surrounding the impact of augmented reality (AR) imaging technologies on orthopedic surgery. In particular, it investigates the impact that AR technologies may have on provider cognitive burden, operative times, occupational radiation exposure, and surgical precision and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many AR technologies have been shown to lower provider cognitive burden and reduce operative time and radiation exposure while improving surgical precision in pre-clinical cadaveric and sawbones models. So far, only a few platforms focusing on pedicle screw placement have been approved by the FDA. These technologies have been implemented clinically with mixed results when compared to traditional free-hand approaches. It remains to be seen if current AR technologies can deliver upon their multitude of promises, and the ability to do so seems contingent upon continued technological progress. Additionally, the impact of these platforms will likely be highly conditional on clinical indication and provider type. It remains unclear if AR will be broadly accepted and utilized or if it will be reserved for niche indications where it adds significant value. One thing is clear, orthopedics' high utilization of pre- and intra-operative imaging, combined with the relative ease of tracking rigid structures like bone as compared to soft tissues, has made it the clear beachhead market for AR technologies in medicine.

Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review

BACKGROUND & AIM

Utilization of augmented reality (AR) and heads-up displays (HUD) to aid orthopaedic surgery has the potential to benefit surgeons and patients alike through improved accuracy, safety, and educational benefits. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the opportunity for adoption of novel technology is more relevant. The aims are to assess the technology available, to understand the current evidence regarding the benefit and to consider challenges to implementation in clinical practice.

METHODS & RESULTS

PRISMA guidelines were used to filter the literature. Of 1004 articles returned the following exclusion criteria were applied: 1) reviews/commentaries 2) unrelated to orthopaedic surgery 3) use of other AR wearables beyond visual aids leaving 42 papers for review.This review illustrates benefits including enhanced accuracy and reduced time of surgery, reduced radiation exposure and educational benefits.

CONCLUSION

Whilst there are obstacles to overcome, there are already reports of technology being used. As with all novel technologies, a greater understanding of the learning curve is crucial, in addition to shielding our patients from this learning curve. Improvements in usability and implementing surgeons' specific needs should increase uptake.

Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Surgery Is Emerging from Proof of Concept Towards Clinical Studies: a Literature Review Explaining the Technology and Current State of the Art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Augmented reality (AR) is becoming increasingly popular in modern-day medicine. Computer-driven tools are progressively integrated into clinical and surgical procedures. The purpose of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the current technology and its challenges based on recent literature mainly focusing on clinical, cadaver, and innovative sawbone studies in the field of orthopedic surgery. The most relevant literature was selected according to clinical and innovational relevance and is summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

Augmented reality applications in orthopedic surgery are increasingly reported. In this review, we summarize basic principles of AR including data preparation, visualization, and registration/tracking and present recently published clinical applications in the area of spine, osteotomies, arthroplasty, trauma, and orthopedic oncology. Higher accuracy in surgical execution, reduction of radiation exposure, and decreased surgery time are major findings presented in the literature. In light of the tremendous progress of technological developments in modern-day medicine and emerging numbers of research groups working on the implementation of AR in routine clinical procedures, we expect the AR technology soon to be implemented as standard devices in orthopedic surgery.

Development and Pre-Clinical Analysis of Spatiotemporal-Aware Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Interventions

Suboptimal interaction with patient data and challenges in mastering 3D anatomy based on ill-posed 2D interventional images are essential concerns in image-guided therapies. Augmented reality (AR) has been introduced in the operating rooms in the last decade; however, in image-guided interventions, it has often only been considered as a visualization device improving traditional workflows. As a consequence, the technology is gaining minimum maturity that it requires to redefine new procedures, user interfaces, and interactions. The main contribution of this paper is to reveal how exemplary workflows are redefined by taking full advantage of head-mounted displays when entirely co-registered with the imaging system at all times. The awareness of the system from the geometric and physical characteristics of X-ray imaging allows the exploration of different human-machine interfaces. Our system achieved an error of 4.76 ± 2.91mm for placing K-wire in a fracture management procedure, and yielded errors of 1.57 ± 1.16° and 1.46 ± 1.00° in the abduction and anteversion angles, respectively, for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared the results with the outcomes from baseline standard operative and non-immersive AR procedures, which had yielded errors of [4.61mm, 4.76°, 4.77°] and [5.13mm, 1.78°, 1.43°], respectively, for wire placement, and abduction and anteversion during THA. We hope that our holistic approach towards improving the interface of surgery not only augments the surgeon's capabilities but also augments the surgical team's experience in carrying out an effective intervention with reduced complications and provide novel approaches of documenting procedures for training purposes.

Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Practice and Education

Augmented reality (AR) technology enhances a user's perception through the superimposition of digital information on physical images while still allowing for interaction with the physical world. The tracking, data processing, and display technology of traditional computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation have the potential to be consolidated to an AR headset equipped with high-fidelity cameras, microcomputers, and optical see-through lenses that create digital holographic images. This article evaluates AR applications specific to total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, and the opportunities for AR to enhance arthroplasty education and professional development.