Do Patients With Psychological Distress Have Poorer Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Preoperative Symptoms of Depression are Associated With Worse Capability 6-weeks and 6-months After Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of depression have been associated with greater incapability following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A brief, 2-question, measure of symptoms of depression - the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) - may be sufficient to measure associations with the magnitude of incapability during recovery from THA. This study investigated whether preoperative symptoms of depression (measured with the PHQ-2) correlated with levels of incapability 6 weeks and 6 months after THA, accounting for demographic and clinical factors.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study across 5 centers and recruited 101 patients undergoing THA, of whom 90 (89%) completed follow-up. Patients completed demographics, a preoperative 2-item (PHQ-2) measure of symptoms of depression, and the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) at 6-weeks and 6-months postoperatively. Negative binomial regression models determined factors associated with HOOS JR at 6 weeks and 6 months, accounting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Accounting for potential confounding factors, we found that higher preoperative PHQ-2 scores (reflecting greater symptoms of depression) were associated with lower HOOS JR scores (reflecting a greater level of hip disability) at both 6 weeks (regression coefficient = -0.67, P < .001) and 6 months (regression coefficient = -1.9, P < .001) after THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of depression on a 2-question preoperative questionnaire are common, and greater symptoms of depression are associated with reduced capability within the first year following THA. These findings support the prioritization of routine mental health assessments before THA. Measuring mindset using relatively brief instruments will be important considering the current shift toward implementing self-reported measures of health status in clinical practice and incorporating them within alternative payment models.

Outcomes following staged bilateral total hip replacement: does first-side surgery predict the second?

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bilateral staged total hip replacements (THRs) were reviewed to determine whether first-side surgery can predict second-side outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of a consecutive cohort of staged bilateral THRs using the same approach, implant and technique, from August 2009 to February 2020. Minimal important change (MIC) in PROMs was set at ≥5.

RESULTS

A total of 296 consecutive staged bilateral THRs were performed in 148 patients. Mean time interval between sides was 25 months (range 2-102). Mean age was 63.2 years for the first side and 65.3 years for the second; 62.8% of patients were female. Mean body mass index was 31.08 for the first side, increasing to 31.57 for the second side (p = 0.248). One-year follow-up PROMs were available for 96.6% and 92.5% of the first and second side, respectively. Mean PROMs improvement at 1 year was 26.4 for the first side and 25.1 for the second side (p = 0.207). Some 97.9% of patients achieved MIC for the first side and 96.3% for the second side (p = 0.092). Eight patients failed to reach an MIC on one side, all were female (p < 0.001); however, MIC was achieved for the contralateral side. Seven of eight patients (87.5%) achieved MIC by 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified no significant difference between first- and second-side PROMs improvements following staged bilateral THRs at 1-year follow-up. Failure to reach MIC on one side does not preclude success on the other. Female patients were more prone to not reach MIC at 1 year, but improvement was still subsequently achieved in the majority of cases. The informed consent process is able to reflect this expectation.

Influence of health literacy on health-related quality of life after total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Personal knowledge about the own disease, a key component of health literacy (HL), may have a considerable impact on treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the patients' knowledge about the surgical procedure, risks, and aftercare, as well as the satisfaction with the preoperative level of information, has an influence on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 176 patients (68.3 ± 10.3 years, 60.8% female) were evaluated. HRQoL was assessed prior to surgery as well as one and twelve months after THA using the 12-item Short Form Questionnaire. Following standardized surgical informed consent, HL was assessed preoperatively using a self-constructed quiz score, while information satisfaction was measured with a single-item rating scale. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including pain (VAS), functionality (WOMAC), and psychological distress (PHQ-4), were also assessed at baseline. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine whether HL, satisfaction with information, age, social class, WOMAC, VAS, and PHQ-4 predict HRQoL at one and twelve months post-surgery.

RESULTS

The average HL quiz score was 23 ± 5.1 out of a possible 33 points. Social class index significantly influenced HL (p < 0.001). A weak correlation between HL and age (r = 0.23, p = 0.01) and no correlation between HL and psychological distress (p = 0.868) were observed. One month after THA, physical HRQoL was significantly predicted by the WOMAC index (p = 0.031) and subjective satisfaction with information (p = 0.022), but not by HL. After twelve months, only the WOMAC was a significant predictor (p < 0.001) of physical HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Although subjective satisfaction with the patient's preoperative level of information had a significant effect on the physical HRQoL at one month after THA, the influence of osteoarthritis severity outweighed this effect after twelve months. HL had no direct influence on HRQoL. These results suggest that patient satisfaction, rather than knowledge, predicts HRQoL.

Resilience correlates with patient-reported outcome measures at a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Aims

We aimed to evaluate the correlation between preoperative and postoperative resilience scores and postoperative outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 98 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair. We assessed resilience using the Brief Resilience Scale. Postoperatively, we obtained patient-reported outcomes measures including American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Health-10 at minimum 2-year follow-up. We used Spearman correlation coefficients (r) to assess the relationship between variables.

Results

Ninety-one of 98 patients (93%) provided follow-up at an average of 32 months. Preoperative Brief Resilience Scale did not show a statistically significant correlation with American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (r = 0.156; p = 0.142). However, preoperative Brief Resilience Scale showed statistically significant correlations with Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Health-10 (r = 0.290; p = 0.005) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (r = 0.259; p = 0.014). Postoperative Brief Resilience Scale showed statistically significant correlations with American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (r = 0.291; p = 0.005), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (r = 0.384; p < 0.001) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Health-10 (r = 0.515; p < 0.001).

Discussion

Resilience may be a valuable predictor of patients at risk of having suboptimal outcomes after rotator cuff repair and a target to improve surgical outcomes through non-surgical means.

The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on Disability and Expected Improvement Before Surgery for Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury

PURPOSE

Psychosocial factors influence pain and recovery after extremity trauma and may be targets for early intervention. This may be of particular interest for patients with adult traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI), given the broad and devastating impact of the injury. We hypothesized that there would be an association between depressive symptoms, anxiety, and pain interference with preoperative disability and expectations for improvement after BPI surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 34 patients into a prospective multicenter cohort study for those undergoing surgery for adult traumatic BPI. Before surgery, participants completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scales for pain interference, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, and a validated BPI-specific measure of disability and expected improvement. We performed Pearson correlation analysis between pain interference, anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms with (A) disability and (B) expected improvement. We created separate linear regression models for (A) disability and (B) expected improvement including adjustment for severity of plexus injury, age, sex, and race.

RESULTS

Among 34 patients, there was a moderate, statistically significant, correlation between preoperative depressive symptoms and higher disability. This remained significant in a linear regression model adjusted for severity of plexus injury, age, sex, and race. There was no association between severity of plexus injury and disability. Depressive symptoms also were moderately, but significantly, correlated with higher expected improvement. This remained significant in a linear regression model adjusted for severity of plexus injury, age, sex, and race.

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptoms are associated with greater disability and higher expected improvement before BPI surgery. Screening for depressive symptoms can help BPI teams identify patients who would benefit from early referral to mental health specialists and tailor appropriate expectations counseling for functional recovery. We did not find an association between severity of BPI and patient-reported disability, suggesting either that the scale may lack validity or that the sample is biased.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Preoperative Veteran RAND-12 Mental Composite Score of >60 Associated With Increased Likelihood of Patient Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to determine the distribution of Veterans RAND 12-Item health survey (VR-12) mental component scores (MCS) of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the thresholds of VR-12 MCS scores that predict higher health care utilizations and 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 4,194 primary THA patients (January 2016 to December 2019) were included. Multivariable and cubic spline regression models were used to test for associations between preoperative VR-12 MCS and postoperative outcomes, including: 90-day hospital resource utilization (nonhome discharge, prolonged length of stay [LOS](ie, ≥3 days), all-cause readmission), attainment of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at 1-year postoperative and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) in the hip disability osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)-pain and HOOS-physical short form.

RESULTS

Lower VR-12 MCS was associated with older age, obesity, Black race, women, and smokers (all P < .001). Preoperative VR-12 MCS<20 was associated with more than twice the odds of nonhome discharge (odds ratio [OR]:2.31) and prolonged LOS (OR: 3.46). VR-12 MCS >60 was associated with higher odds of achieving PASS (OR: 2.00) and SCB in HOOS-joint related (JR) (OR: 1.16). Starting VR-12 MCS ≤40, there were exponentially higher odds of worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Low preoperative VR-12 MCS, specifically less than 40, may predict increased health care utilization. Furthermore, preoperative VR-12 MCS>60 predicts greater satisfaction at 1 year and higher odds of achieving SCB in HOOS-JR. Quantifiable thresholds for VR-12 MCS may aid in shared decision-making and patient counseling in setting expectations or may guide specific care pathway interventions to address mental health during THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is intended to detect a change in a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) large enough for a patient to appreciate. Their growing use in orthopaedic research stems from the necessity to identify a metric, other than the p value, to better assess the effect size of an outcome. Yet, given that MCIDs are population-specific and that there are multiple calculation methods, there is concern about inconsistencies. Given the increasing use of MCIDs in total hip arthroplasty (THA) research, a systematic review of calculated MCID values and their respective ranges, as well as an assessment of their applications, is important to guide and encourage their use as a critical measure of effect size in THA outcomes research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We systematically reviewed MCID calculations and reporting in current THA research to answer the following: (1) What are the most-reported PROM MCIDs in THA, and what is their range of values? (2) What proportion of studies report anchor-based versus distribution-based MCID values? (3) What are the most common methods by which anchor-based MCID values are derived? (4) What are the most common derivation methods for distribution-based MCID values? (5) How do the reported medians and corresponding ranges compare between calculation methods for each PROM?

METHODS

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases were systematically reviewed from inception through March 2022 for THA studies reporting an MCID value for any PROMs. Two independent authors reviewed articles for inclusion. All articles calculating new PROM MCID scores after primary THA were included for data extraction and analysis. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each article. In total, 30 articles were included. There were 45 unique PROMs for which 242 MCIDs were reported. These studies had a total of 1,000,874 patients with a median age of 64 years and median BMI of 28.7 kg/m 2 . Women made up 55% of patients in the total study population, and the median follow-up period was 12 months (range 0 to 77 months). The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate using the modified Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria for comparative studies (the mean score for comparative papers in this review was 18 of 24, with higher scores representing better study quality) and noncomparative studies (for these, the mean score was 10 of a possible 16 points, with higher scores representing higher study quality). Calculated values were classified as anchor-based, distribution-based, or not reported. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each study. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were compared for each unique PROM using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, given the non-normal distribution of values.

RESULTS

The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (HOOS) Pain and Quality of Life subscore MCIDs were the most frequently reported, comprising 12% (29 of 242), 8% (20 of 242), and 8% (20 of 242), respectively. The EuroQol VAS (EQ-VAS) was the next-most frequently reported (7% [17 of 242]) followed by the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) (7% [16 of 242]). The median anchor-based value for the OHS was 9 (IQR 8 to 11), while the median distribution-based value was 6 (IQR 5 to 6). The median anchor-based MCID values for HOOS Pain and Quality of Life were 33 (IQR 28 to 35) and 25 (14 to 27), respectively; the median distribution-based values were 10 (IQR 9 to 10) and 13 (IQR 10 to 14), respectively. Thirty percent (nine of 30) of studies used an anchor-based method to calculate a new MCID, while 40% (12 of 30) used a distribution-based technique. Thirty percent of studies (nine of 30) calculated MCID values using both methods. For studies reporting an anchor-based calculation method, a question assessing pain relief, satisfaction, or quality of life on a five-point Likert scale was the most commonly used anchor (30% [eight of 27]), followed by a receiver operating characteristic curve estimation (22% [six of 27]). For studies using distribution-based calculations, the most common method was one-half the standard deviation of the difference between preoperative and postoperative PROM scores (46% [12 of 26]). Most reported median MCID values (nine of 14) did not differ by calculation method for each unique PROM (p > 0.05). The OHS, HOOS JR, and HOOS Function, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living subscores all varied by calculation method, because each anchor-based value was larger than its respective distribution-based value.

CONCLUSION

We found that MCIDs do not vary very much by calculation method across most outcome measurement tools. Additionally, there are consistencies in MCID calculation methods, because most authors used an anchor question with a Likert scale for the anchor-based approach or used one-half the standard deviation of preoperative and postoperative PROM score differences for the distribution-based approach. For some of the most frequently reported MCIDs, however, anchor-based values tend to be larger than distribution-based values for their respective PROMs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We recommend using a 9-point increase as the MCID for the OHS, consistent with the median reported anchor-based value derived from several high-quality studies with large patient groups that used anchor-based approaches for MCID calculations, which we believe are most appropriate for most applications in clinical research. Likewise, we recommend using the anchor-based 33-point and 25-point MCIDs for the HOOS Pain and Quality of Life subscores, respectively. We encourage using anchor-based MCID values of WOMAC Pain, Function, and Stiffness subscores, which were 29, 26, and 30, respectively.

Effect of documented and undocumented psychiatric conditions on length of stay and discharge destination after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Length of stay (LOS) and readmissions are quality metrics linked to physician payments and substantially impact the cost of care. This study aims to evaluate the effect of documented and undocumented psychiatric conditions on LOS, discharge location, and readmission following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Retrospective review of all primary, unilateral TKA from 2015 to 2020 at a high-volume, academic orthopedic hospital was conducted. Patients were separated into three cohorts: patients with a documented psychiatric diagnosis (+Dx), patients without a documented psychiatric diagnosis but with an actively prescribed psychiatric medication (-Dx), and patients without a psychiatric diagnosis or medication (control). Patient demographics, LOS, discharge location, and 90 days readmissions were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 2935 patients were included; 1051 patients had no recorded psychiatric medications (control); 1884 patients took at least one psychiatric medication, of which 1161 (61.6%) were in the-Dx and 723 (38.4%) were in the +Dx cohort. Operative time (+Dx, 103.4 ± 29.1 and -Dx, 103.1 ± 28.5 vs. 93.6 ± 26.2 min, p < 0.001 for both comparisons) and hospital LOS stay (+ Dx, 3.00 ± 1.70 and -Dx, 3.01 ± 1.83 vs. 2.82 ± 1.40 days, p = 0.021 and p = 0.006, respectively) were greater for patients taking psychiatric medications when compared to the control group. Patients taking psychiatric medication with or without associated diagnosis were significantly more likely to be discharged to a secondary facility-22.8% and 20.9%, respectively-compared to controls, at 12.5% (p < 0.001). Ninety-day readmission rates did not differ between the control and both psychiatric groups (p = 0.693 and p = 0.432, respectively).

CONCLUSION

TKA patients taking psychiatric medications with or without a documented psychiatric diagnosis have increased hospital LOS and higher chances of discharge to a secondary facility. Most patients taking psychiatric medication also had no associated diagnosis. Payment models should consider the presence of undocumented psychiatric diagnoses when constructing metrics. Surgeons and institutions should also direct their attention to identifying, recording, and managing these patients to improve outcomes.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Metrics of Clinically Important Changes in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become a regularly used metric, there is little consensus on the methodology used to determine clinically relevant postoperative outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature for studies that have identified metrics of clinical efficacy after total hip arthroplasty (THA) including minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), minimal detectable change (MDC), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB).

METHODS

A systematic review examining quantitative metrics for assessing clinical improvement with PROMs following THA was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the MEDLINE database from 2008 to 2020. Inclusion criteria included full texts, English language, primary THA with minimum 1-year follow-up, use of metrics for assessing clinical outcomes with PROMs, and primary derivations of those metrics. Sixteen studies (24,487 THA patients) met inclusion criteria and 11 different PROMs were reported.

RESULTS

MCIDs were calculated using distribution methods in 7 studies (44%), anchor methods in 2 studies (13%), and both methods in 2 studies (13%). MDC was calculated in 2 studies, PASS was reported in 1 study using anchor-based method, and SCB was calculated in 1 study using anchor-based method.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of consistency in the literature regarding the use and interpretation of PROMs to assess patient satisfaction. MCID was the most frequently reported measure, while MDC, SCB, and PASS were used relatively infrequently. Method of derivation varied based on the PROM used; distribution method was more frequently used for MCID.

Should We Aim to Help Patients "Feel Better" or "Feel Good" After Total Hip Arthroplasty? Determining Factors Affecting the Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State

BACKGROUND

Recent attempts have been made to use preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds as prior authorization criteria based on the assumption that patients who have higher baseline scores are less likely to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This study aimed to identify factors affecting the achievement of MCID and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to determine the overlap between the two outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 3,581 primary, unilateral THAs performed at a single practice in 2015-2019. PROMs including Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS according to attainment of MCID was assessed. Multivariable regression was used to identify independent predictors of MCID and PASS.

RESULTS

In total, 79.8% achieved MCID and 73.6% achieved PASS for HOOS-JR. Approximately 1 in 7 patients who achieved MCID did not eventually achieve PASS. Worse preoperative HOOS-JR (odd ratio 0.933) was associated with MCID attainment. Better preoperative HOOS-JR (odd ratio 1.015) was associated with PASS attainment. Men, lower body mass index, better American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and better preoperative 12-item Short Form Health Survey mental score were predictors of MCID and PASS. Age, race, ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after THA, albeit in opposite directions. Clinicians should strive to help patients "feel better" and "feel good" after surgery. Preoperative PROMs should not solely be used to prioritize access to care.

Preoperative mental distress is associated with poorer physical improvements after revision total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Despite the increasing prevalence of mental health disorders in revision arthroplasty patients, the impact of preoperative mental distress on functional outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) remains unclear. Our study aims to investigate the impact of preoperative mental distress on functional outcomes after rTHA.

Methods

Prospectively collected data of 84 rTHAs was extracted from a single institution's joint replacement registry. Preoperative Short Form-36 (SF-36) mental component summary (MCS) was used to dichotomize patients to those who were distressed (MCS <50) and non-distressed (MCS ≥50). Multivariable analysis was used to analyze the impact of preoperative mental distress on various outcomes such as the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment at 6 months and 2 years postoperatively.

Results

Compared to non-distressed patients, patients with preoperative mental distress had poorer improvements in PCS (+11.4 vs + 16.9, p = 0.007) and lower rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment (55.2% vs 73.0%, p = 0.026) at 2 years postoperatively. However, there were no significant differences in improvements for WOMAC and OHS (p > 0.05). Despite experiencing greater absolute improvements in MCS (+12.1 vs -2.1, p < 0.001) and higher MCID attainment rates (65.5% vs 24.3%, p = 0.005) at 2 years, preoperatively distressed patients had lower MCS levels compared to their non-distressed counterparts at all time points (p-value<0.05). There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction (p = 0.509) or expectation fulfilment (p-value = 0.342) at 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusion

Revision THA led to substantial mental health improvements in patients with preoperative mental distress. Despite this, preoperative mental distress was associated with poorer physical improvements after surgery.

The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize "Feeling Better" or "Feeling Good" After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the overlap between the two outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 1,239 primary, unilateral TKAs performed at a single institution in 2015-2019. PROMs including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS as per attainment of MCID was assessed. A multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of MCID and PASS.

RESULTS

In total, 71.3% achieved MCID and 75.5% achieved PASS for KOOS-JR. Only 7.7% achieved MCID but not PASS, whereas almost twice this number did not achieve MCID but did achieve PASS (11.9%). Poorer preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 0.925), better SF-12 physical (OR 1.025), and mental (OR 1.027) were associated with MCID attainment. In contrast, better preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 1.030) and SF-12 mental (OR 1.025) were associated with PASS attainment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and smoking status were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after TKA, albeit some positively and some negatively. In the era of value-based care, clinicians should not only strive to help patients "feel better" but also ensure that patients "feel good" after surgery. This study does not support the use of PROMs in prioritizing access to care.

Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Phenotypes

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is indicative of the quality of care in the value-driven healthcare model. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a dichotomous outcome tool measuring the highest level of symptom beyond which a patient considers him/herself well. The purpose of the present study was to identify combined preoperative phenotypes of PROMs associated with not achieving PASS at 1 year following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to associate such phenotypes with hospital utilization parameters.

METHODS

A prospective institutional cohort of 4,034 patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis (OA) with 1-year follow-up was included. Preoperative scores on Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-pain, HOOS physical short form-(PS), and Veteran's Rand-12 (VR-12) mental component summary-(MCS) were used to develop phenotypes. Associations between preoperative 'phenotype' and 1-year PASS, discharge disposition, prolonged length of stay, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation were evaluated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

10.6% (427/4,043) reported their state as 'not satisfactory' at 1 year. The phenotypes were the only preoperative factors to demonstrate the increased likelihood of 1-year dissatisfaction. Only phenotypes with lower than average preoperative MCS demonstrated this association. Low scores in all presently measured PROMs (Pain-PS-MCS-) was associated with double the odds of 1-year dissatisfaction (P < .001), 2.43 times the odds of nonhome discharge and 2.2 times the odds of prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower preoperative scores across multiple PROMs have increased odds of dissatisfaction after THA; and assessing pain, function, and MCS concomitantly (as phenotypes) may support identifying patients at risk for not achieving a satisfactory outcome.

Combinations of Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Phenotype (Pain, Function, and Mental Health) Predict Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Value-driven healthcare models prioritize patient-perceived benefits to quantify the quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is the highest level of symptom beyond which a patient considers his/her condition satisfactory. We identified preoperative phenotypes of PROMs associated with not achieving PASS at 1 year following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and explored the relationships between such phenotypes with hospital utilization parameters.

METHODS

A prospective institutional cohort of 5,274 primary TKAs for osteoarthritis from 2016 to 2019 with 1-year follow-up were included. Preoperative scores on Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain, KOOS-Physical function Short form (PS), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) were used to develop patient phenotypes. Associations between preoperative "phenotype" and 1-year PASS, discharge disposition, length of stay, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation were evaluated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

In total, 16.3% (n = 862) of patients reported their state as "not acceptable" at 1 year. A combination of low scores in each of the presently examined PROMs was associated with the highest odds of 1-year dissatisfaction (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.74-2.74). The PROM phenotypes were the greatest drivers compared to sociodemographic variables in predicting satisfaction. Combinations of low scores in VR-12 MCS and KOOS-PS were significantly associated with both non-home discharge status and prolonged length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Patients with combined lower preoperative scores across multiple PROMs (KOOS-Pain <41.7, KOOS-PS <51.5, and VR-12 MCS <52.8) have increased odds of dissatisfaction after TKA. Measuring pain, function, and mental health concurrently as phenotypes may help identify TKA patients at risk for not achieving a satisfactory outcome at 1 year.

Patients Obtain Meaningful Clinical Benefit After Hip Arthroscopy Despite Preoperative Psychological Distress: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Mid-Term Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of baseline psychological distress on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement at a minimum of 5 years.

METHODS

Demographic and intraoperative data were prospectively collected from patients who underwent primary arthroscopic hip surgery for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears after failure of conservative management between June 2012 and December 2014. Included patients had preoperative and minimum 5-year postoperative PROs and visual analog scale scores for pain and satisfaction. The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score was used to stratify patients into 2 cohorts: Patients with an average or above-average score (SF-12 MCS score ≥ 50) were considered psychologically non-distressed, whereas those who scored below average (SF-12 MCS score < 50) were considered to have psychological distress. Distressed patients were propensity matched by age, sex, and body mass index to an equal number of non-distressed patients.

RESULTS

Of the 153 hips that met the inclusion criteria, 117 (76.5%) had minimum 5-year follow-up. Eighty-two hips were included in the final analysis after propensity matching, with 41 in both the distressed and non-distressed cohorts. Preoperatively, patients in the distressed cohort reported inferior scores for all PROs. There was a significant difference in the SF-12 MCS score between groups at 2 years, but similar scores were observed for all other PROs. At minimum 5-year follow-up, there were no differences between groups for any PRO. There were no differences in the rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference for all PROs or in achieving the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with baseline psychological distress may have a lower functional status at the time of presentation but still gain meaningful clinical benefit and pain improvement from arthroscopic hip surgery, with mid-term outcomes comparable to those obtained by patients without preoperative psychological distress.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Can patients with psychological distress achieve comparable functional outcomes and satisfaction after hallux valgus surgery? A 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the influence of preoperative mental health on functional outcomes and satisfaction, and the change in mental health after hallux valgus surgery.

METHODS

383 patients who underwent scarf osteotomy were analyzed. Visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score (AOFAS) and SF-36 were assessed at 6 months and 2 years. The cohort was stratified into patients with and without psychological distress (i.e. SF-36 Mental Component Summary [MCS] <50 vs ≥50).

RESULTS

After adjusting for demographics and baseline scores, VAS and AOFAS were poorer in the distressed group at 6 months. However, there was no difference in scores at 2 years and a similar proportion of patients were satisfied. SF-36 MCS in distressed patients significantly improved, but remained lower compared to non-distressed patients at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psychological distress undergoing hallux valgus surgery had poorer short-term outcomes, but these differences resolved at 2 years.

Preoperative Mental Health Influences Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Satisfaction After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A higher prevalence of mental health conditions has been reported in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). This study investigated the effect of preoperative mental health on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction after rTKA.

METHODS

A total of 245 patients who underwent rTKA in 2004-2018 were identified from our institutional joint registry. The most common indications were aseptic loosening (n = 111), infection (n = 70), and instability (n = 35). 36-item Short-Form health survey (SF-36) mental component summary (MCS) was used to stratify the cohort into: Low-MCS (SF-36 MCS <50; n = 112) and control (SF-36 MCS ≥50; n = 133) groups. Knee Society score, Oxford knee score, SF-36 physical score, and a satisfaction questionnaire were used to compare the low-MCS and control at 6 months and 2 years.

RESULTS

All PROMs were poorer in the low-MCS group at 6 months and 2 years. However, both groups demonstrated a comparable improvement in each PROM and a similar proportion attained the minimal clinically important difference. Fewer patients in the low-MCS group were satisfied at 2 years (72.2% vs 84.5%, P = .045). Lower preoperative SF-36 MCS was independently associated with increased odds of dissatisfaction (OR 1.037, 95% CI 1.004-1.070, P = .027). Although the change in SF-36 MCS was greater in the low-MCS group, the final value remained lower at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

While patients with poor mental health had inferior PROMs preoperatively and postoperatively, a similar percentage experienced a clinically meaningful improvement at 2 years. Perioperative optimization of psychological factors should still be emphasized as these patients were at a higher risk of dissatisfaction after rTKA.

Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score 12

The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess prosthesis awareness during daily activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference that is evaluated as beneficial and could change the patient’s clinical management. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is considered the minimum PROMs cut-off value that corresponds to a patient’s satisfactory state of health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been already demonstrated, the MCID and the PASS of this score have not previously been defined. Patients undergoing THA from January 2019 to October 2019 were assessed pre-operatively and six months post-surgery using the FJS-12, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Pre-operative and follow-up questionnaires were completed by 50 patients. Both distribution-based approaches and anchor approaches were used to estimate MCID. The aim of this paper was to assess the MCID and PASS values of FJS-12 after total hip replacement. The FJS-12 MCID from baseline to 6 months post-operative follow-up was 17.5. The PASS calculated ranged from 69.8 to 91.7.

Early post-operative oxford knee score and knee society score predict patient satisfaction 2 years after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is poor correlation between functional outcomes and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We asked if early post-operative scores at 6 months or the pre- to post-operative change in scores are predictive of patient satisfaction 2 years after TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected registry data of 4359 TKAs performed at a single institution. At 6 months and 2 years, the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Short-Form 36 scores were assessed. A satisfaction questionnaire was also completed. Logistic regression was used to generate receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the ability of each scoring system in predicting satisfaction at 2 years.

RESULTS

At 2 years, 91.1% of patients were satisfied. For the absolute post-operative OKS at 6 months, an AUC of 0.762 (95% CI 0.736-0.788) and a threshold of ≤ 21.5 points (or ≥ 38.5 points on the new scale) were obtained. For the KSS knee score, an AUC of 0.704 (95% CI 0.674-0.734) and a threshold of ≥ 80.5 points were identified. The OKS performed significantly better than the KSS knee score (p = 0.03) and the other post-operative scores (p < 0.001). When analysing the change in scores pre-operatively to 6 months, the AUC was < 0.7 for all scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-operative scores, specifically the OKS and KSS knee score, can predict patient satisfaction at 2 years after TKA with good accuracy. The threshold values offer surgeons an additional tool to identify patients at risk of dissatisfaction at 2 years, enabling them to intervene earlier to ensure good patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.