The Impact of Arthroplasty Fellowship Training on Total Joint Arthroplasty: Comparison of Peri-Operative Metrics between Fellowship-Trained Surgeons and Non-Fellowship-Trained Surgeons

Revision Hip Arthroplasty Performed by Fellowship-Trained Versus Non-Fellowship-Trained Surgeons: A Comparison of Perioperative Management and Complications

BACKGROUND

Successful revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) requires major resource allocation and a surgical team adept at managing these complex cases. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of rTHA performed by fellowship-trained and non-fellowship-trained surgeons.

METHODS

A national administrative database was utilized to identify 5,880 patients who underwent aseptic rTHA and 1,622 patients who underwent head-liner exchange for infection by fellowship-trained and non-fellowship-trained surgeons from 2010 to 2020 with a 5-year follow-up. Postoperative opioid and anticoagulant prescriptions were compared among surgeons. Patients treated by fellowship-trained and non-fellowship-trained surgeons had propensity scores matched based on age, sex, comorbidity index, and diagnosis. The 5-year surgical complications were compared using descriptive statistics. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the odds of failure following head-liner exchange when performed by a fellowship-trained versus non-fellowship-trained surgeon.

RESULTS

Aseptic rTHA patients treated by fellowship-trained surgeons received fewer opioids (132 versus 165 milligram morphine equivalents per patient) and nonaspirin anticoagulants (21.4 versus 32.0%, P < .001). Fellowship-training was associated with lower dislocation rates (9.9 versus 14.2%, P = .011), fewer postoperative infections, and fewer periprosthetic fractures and re-revisions (15.2 versus 21.3%, P < .001). Head-liner exchange for infection performed by fellowship-trained surgeons was associated with lower odds of failure (31.2 versus 45.7%, odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.91, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

rTHA performed by adult reconstruction fellowship-trained surgeons results in fewer re-revisions in aseptic cases and head-liner exchanges. Variations in resources, volumes, and perioperative protocols may account for some of the differences.

Fellowship Training in Arthroplasty Improves Treatment Success of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Knee Infections

Background

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a well-accepted surgical strategy for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DAIR in TKA may be incorrectly thought of as a "simple" procedure not requiring formal specialized training in arthroplasty. Currently, there are no studies comparing the risk of treatment failure based on surgeon fellowship training.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent DAIR for TKA PJI at our institution. Two cohorts were created based on whether DAIR was performed by an arthroplasty fellowship-trained (FT) surgeon or nonarthroplasty fellowship-trained (NoFT) surgeon. Primary outcome was treatment failure following DAIR at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Treatment failure was based on the Tier 1 International Consensus Meeting definition of infection control. Secondary outcomes were also recorded including death during the totality of PJI treatment.

Results

A total of 112 patients were identified (FT = 68, NoFT = 44). At a mean follow-up of 7.3 years [standard deviation = 3.9], 73 patients (59.8%) failed treatment. Fellowship training in arthroplasty significantly improved treatment success rates (FT, 35/68 [51.5%]; NoFT, 10/44 [22.7%]; odds ratio 2.5 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.9; P = .002]). Survivorship also differed significantly between the cohorts; at timepoints of 1.5 months, 5 months, 30 months, and 180 months, survivorship of the FT cohort was 79.4%, 67.6%, 54.4%, and 50.7%, respectively, compared with a survivorship of 65.9%, 52.3%, 25%, and 22.7% in the NoFT cohort (P = .002).

Conclusions

TKA PJI treated with DAIR should not be considered a simple procedure. Improved treatment success may be associated with subspecialty fellowship training in arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence

IV.

Adult Reconstruction Surgeons Manage Patients With Higher Medical Complexities and Still Achieve Comparable Outcomes to Sports Medicine Surgeons Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Orthopaedic surgeons who are fellowship-trained in adult reconstruction (AR) specialize specifically in total joint arthroplasty, including total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, TKA procedures are not only performed by AR surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the patient demographics and postoperative outcomes of patients who had a TKA procedure performed by an AR surgeon vs a sports medicine (SM) surgeon.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national insurance database. Patients who underwent a primary elective TKA procedure by an AR surgeon (n = 56,570) and an SM surgeon (n = 72,888) were identified. Patient demographics, rates of joint complications within 2 years, and medical complications within 90 days postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Compared to the cohort of patients undergoing TKA by SM surgeons, the patient cohort of AR surgeons had a higher mean Elixhauser comorbidity index (4.2 vs 4.0, P < .001), and had significantly higher rates of several comorbidities. Within 90 days, patients of AR surgeons demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute kidney injury and transfusions. When compared to patients of SM surgeons, patients of AR surgeons demonstrated significantly lower rate of manipulation under anesthesia or lysis of adhesions within 2 years. Rates of all other joint-related complications were statistically comparable between the 2 cohorts.

Conclusions

As a cohort, AR surgeons perform TKA on a higher-risk cohort of patients compared to sports medicine surgeons. Despite the higher-risk patient population, outcomes of TKA by AR surgeons appear equivalent compared to their SM colleagues.

Evaluating Patient and Surgeon Characteristics Associated with Care Cost and Outcomes for Knee and Hip Replacement Procedures: A National Medicare Cohort Study

Background

The role of physician credentialing has been widely considered in quality and outcome improvement studies. However, the association between surgeon characteristics and health-care costs remains unclear.

Methods

Our objective was to determine the association of orthopaedic surgeon characteristics with health outcomes and costs, utilizing Medicare data. We used 100% Fee-for-Service Medicare data from 2015 to 2019 to identify all patients ≥65 years of age who underwent 2 common orthopaedic surgical procedures, total hip and knee replacement. After determining whether the patients had been readmitted after discharge from their initial admission for surgery, we computed 3 metrics of total medical expenditure: the costs of the initial surgery admission and 30-day and 180-day episode-based bundles of care. Hierarchical linear regression and logistic regression models were used to evaluate patient and surgeon characteristics associated with care costs and the likelihood of readmission.

Results

We identified 2,269 surgeons who performed total knee replacements on 298,934 patients and 1,426 surgeons who performed total hip replacements on 204,721 patients. Patient characteristics associated with higher initial surgery costs included increasing age, female sex, racial minority status, and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. Surgeon characteristics associated with lower readmission rates included practice in the Northeast region and a higher patient volume; having malpractice claims was associated with higher readmission rates.

Conclusions

A higher volume of patients treated by the orthopaedic surgeon was associated with lower overall costs and readmission rates. Information on surgeons' malpractice claims and annual volume should be made publicly available to assist patients, payer networks, and hospitals in surgeon selection and oversight. These results could also inform the guidelines of physician credentialing organizations.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trends in ACGME Accreditation of Orthopedic Surgery Fellowship Training

Currently, most surgeons pursue subspecialty fellowship training. This study answers the following questions: (1) How does the rate of fellowship training in orthopedic surgery compare with that in other surgical specialties? (2) To what extent did adoption of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation change from 2013 to 2021? Orthopedic subspecialties were analyzed for total number of fellowship programs and positions in the 2013 and 2021 Match. Rates of ACGME accreditation were analyzed via chi-square tests. In 2021, orthopedic surgery had the highest rate of fellowship selection (94%) relative to general surgery (77%), ophthalmology (66%), plastic surgery (63%), and otolaryngology (55%). Across all orthopedic subspecialties, the percentage of ACGME accreditation decreased among fellowship programs (53% in 2013 to 48% in 2021, P=.166) and positions (58% in 2013 to 50% in 2021, P<.001). Orthopedic sports medicine had the highest adoption of ACGME accreditation (100%), followed by hand surgery (99%), musculoskeletal oncology (67%), and pediatric orthopedics (56%). Significant increases in the adoption of ACGME accreditation were noted for orthopedic sports medicine (93% in 2013 to 100% in 2021, P=.016) and hand surgery (81% in 2013 to 99% in 2021, P<.001). There was a significant decrease in ACGME accreditation for adult reconstructive orthopedics (40% in 2013 to 24% in 2021, P=.042), driven by the increase in unaccredited fellowship programs. Accreditation of orthopedic subspecialty fellowship training has decreased with respect to the proportion of accredited training positions. More research is needed to understand the benefits of ACGME accreditation for fellowship training in orthopedic surgery. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):57-63.].

Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare perioperative, 90-day, and 1-year postoperative complications and outcomes between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and the posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in geriatric patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multicenter Health care Consortium.

PATIENTS

Seven-hundred and nine patients 60 years or older with acute displaced FNFs between 2009 and 2021.

INTERVENTION

Total hip arthroplasty using either DAA or posterior approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rates of postoperative complications including dislocations, reoperations, and mortality at 90 days and 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included ambulation capacity at discharge, ambulation distance with inpatient physical therapy, discharge disposition, and narcotic prescription quantities (morphine milligram equivalents).

RESULTS

Through a multivariable regression analysis, DAA was associated with significantly shorter operative time ( B = -6.89 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI] -12.84 to -0.93; P = 0.024), lower likelihood of blood transfusion during the index hospital stay (adjusted odds ratios = 0.54; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96; P = 0.045), and decreased average narcotic prescription amounts at 90 days (B = -230.45 morphine milligram equivalents; 95% CI -440.24 to -78.66; P = 0.035) postoperatively. There were no significant differences in medical complications, dislocations, reoperations, and mortality at 90 days and 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

When comparing the DAA versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty performed for displaced FNF, DAA was associated with shorter operative time, lower likelihood of blood transfusion, and lower 90-day postoperative narcotic prescription amounts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Systematic Review of Data Collection by National Joint Replacement Registries: What Opportunities Exist for Enhanced Data Collection and Analysis?

BACKGROUND

National joint replacement registries assist surgeons and hospitals with guiding decision making and quality of care. The data points collected are essential to interpret and analyze data and to understand confounding variables and other sources of bias, which can impair retrospective observational research. The aim of this study was to review all national joint replacement registries to assess what data points are recorded, and in what manner, for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) so that improvements can be made to enhance data collection, interpretation, and analysis.

METHODS

All national registries were identified through Internet and publication search and contacted to invite participation. Data collection forms for both primary and revision THA and TKA were requested. Data collected were entered into an Excel spreadsheet.

RESULTS

The study group for primary and revision THA consisted of 28 national registries, with 26 agreeing to participate. The study group for primary TKA consisted of 27 national registries, with 24 agreeing to participate. Patient identification details were recorded uniformly. Only a minority recorded patient details beyond American Society of Anesthesiologists and body mass index. Most registries did not record surgeon variables: who actually performed or assisted the procedure and their level of training. There was variation in the degree of detail recorded for diagnosis, mostly regarding secondary causes of osteoarthritis and fracture. The details regarding case complexity were limited. Half recorded previous operations, and fewer recorded bone defects. The location of knee arthritis, preoperative limb alignment, and deformities were rarely recorded. Surgical approach and technological adjuncts were routinely collected, but few other details on the surgical technique were recorded. Implant details and fixation were uniformly collected, although a minority recorded specific details, including cement antibiotic or cementing technique. It was uncommon to record whether additional or adjunctive procedures were concurrently performed. Approximately half the registries lacked a revision specific form. The majority recorded reoperations in addition to revision procedures. Patient, surgeon, case, and postoperative details were recorded similar to primary procedures. There was variation in the degree of details recorded for the reasons underlying the revision +/- reoperation, with most recording greater detail for infection and fracture. Many included details on case complexity and bone defects, including the severity, classification, and how the defect was managed. The majority recorded the specific revision procedure that was performed (total or partial), the fixation used, and the components removed or revised. Other specific aspects of fixation including acetabular screws, cone or sleeve use, stems, and augments were less commonly recorded.

CONCLUSION

Substantial data are recorded by all registries, although each one is different. Data solicited lack many patient factors, surgeon variables, case complexity, and surgical techniques. Separate revision forms are not universal, and many registries do not record reoperation procedures, specific causes of revision, and the revision construct.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Understanding online ratings of joint arthroplasty surgeons: A national cross-sectional analysis

Background

Patient reviews provide an important referral source for physicians and an opportunity to improve practice performance. This study's objective was to characterize the online reviews of hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons published by three of the industry's leading platforms.

Methods

A random sample of 1000 hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons across all 50 US states (10 hip and 10 knee surgeons per state) was generated using Google Search. A total of 7842 online reviews posted for those surgeons on Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google were analyzed. A range of surgeons, affiliated hospitals, and reviewer attributes was compared to identify significant predictors of patient satisfaction.

Results

The study cohort had 98.1% male surgeons with a mean age of 53.55 ± 8.94 years and mean experience of 26.43 ± 9.21 years. Younger age (p < 0.001), shorter years of experience (p < 0.001), and arthroplasty fellowship training (p < 0.001) were associated with more positive ratings. Reviewer anonymity, observed in 30.93% of all reviews, tended to correlate with more negative ratings (p < 0.001). Overall, 86.93% of patient remarks were positive, and only 74.81% of remarks centered on physician attributes. The five leading components of patient satisfaction were perceptions of physician competence (34.81%, p < 0.001), bedside manner (23.83%, p = 0.002), and communication (16.17%, p = 0.94); interactions with physician extenders (14.75%, p < 0.001); and wait time (2.73%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

While most ratings of hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons were positive, more than a quarter of reviews were either not directly related to the individual surgeons or were submitted anonymously. Caution is advised regarding overreliance on patient experience surveys as predictors of physician performance.

Direct anterior versus direct lateral hip approach in total hip arthroplasty with the same perioperative protocols one year post fellowship training

BACKGROUND

Variable results have been reported regarding the clinical outcomes in Total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on the surgical approach. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes between Direct anterior (DA) and direct lateral (DL) approaches in THA when performed immediately after fellowship training.

METHODS

During the 1st year of practice, all consecutive patients who underwent THA via DA and DL hip approaches were retrospectively investigated. Patients'demographics, diagnosis, American society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, route of anesthesia, length of hospital stay (LOS), leg length discrepancy (LLD), radiographic parameters, operative time, number of opioids refills postoperatively, and complications were collected and compared between the two groups. The short form of Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) was prospectively collected pre and postoperatively. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years.

RESULTS

Forty patients in DA group and 38 patients in DL group were included. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of demographics, diagnosis, ASA scores, route of anesthesia at the time of THA, postoperative radiographic parameters, LOS, LLD, opioid refills and HOOS scores (p > 0.05). Patients in the DA group had shorter operative time (83 ± 17 min) when compared to the DL group (93 ± 24 min) (p = 0.03). No major complications were found except for one early deep infection patient in DL group.

CONCLUSION

Both DA and DL approaches resulted in satisfactory outcomes in THA when performed by a fellowship trained surgeon.

Fellowship Training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Opportunities and Outcomes

The pursuit of fellowship training stems from one's desire to master a focused area of surgery. Successful applicants tend to have published articles and participated in other scholarly activities. They commonly have a mentor within the subspecialty of their interest. Selection of the program is generally based on the breadth of experience available followed by faculty reputation and location. Advantages to the successful fellowship graduate include the experience and confidence to provide specialized and efficient care to patients. Enhancements to an academic department with a fellowship program include mentorship for residents and guidance toward fellowship, as well as an increased level of scholarly activity.

Surgical Benchmarks for ACGME-accredited Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Fellowship Training

INTRODUCTION

Higher case volumes correlate with improved outcomes in total joint arthroplasty surgery. The purpose of this study was to understand the effect of adult reconstruction fellowship training on reported case volume in a contemporary cohort of orthopaedic surgeons.

METHODS

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided case logs for orthopaedic surgery residents and adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellows from 2017 to 2018 to 2020 to 2021. Reported case volumes for total joint arthroplasty surgeries were compared using Student t tests.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellows and 3,000 orthopaedic surgery residents were included. Residents reported more total hip arthroplasty cases (98.9 ± 30 to 106.1 ± 33, 7.3% increase, P < 0.05) and total knee arthroplasty cases (126.0 ± 41 to 136.5 ± 44, 8.3% increase, P < 0.05) over the study period. On average, fellows reported 439.6 total cases: primary total knee arthroplasty, 164.9 cases (37.5%); primary total hip arthroplasty, 146.8 cases (33.4%); revision total knee arthroplasty, 35.2 cases (8.0%); revision total hip arthroplasty, 33.0 cases (7.5%); unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, 4.4 cases (1.0%); and other, 55.0 cases (12.5%). Overall, adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellowship reported between 1.7- and 2.0-fold more joint arthroplasty cases during 1 year of fellowship training than 5 years of residency ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Adult reconstructive orthopaedic fellowship training provides notable exposure to additional cases after residency training. The results from this study may inform prospective applicants on the effect of fellowship training in total joint arthroplasty and help establish benchmarks in case volume for independent practice.

Surgeons Experience Greater Cardiorespiratory Strain and Stress During Total Hip Arthroplasty Than Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are physically demanding, with a high prevalence of work-related injuries among arthroplasty surgeons. It is unknown whether there are differences in cardiorespiratory output for surgeons while performing THA and TKA. The objective of this study is to characterize whether differences in surgeon physiological response exist while performing primary THA vs TKA.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study including 3 high-volume, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons who wore a smart garment that recorded cardiorespiratory data on operative days during which they were performing primary conventional TKA and THA. Variables collected included patient body mass index (BMI), operative time (minutes), heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and energy expenditure (calories).

RESULTS

Seventy-six consecutive cases (49 THAs and 27 TKAs) were studied. Patient BMI was similar between the 2 cohorts (P > .05), while operative time was significantly longer in TKAs (60.4 ± 12.0 vs 53.6 ± 11.8; P = .029). During THA, surgeons had a significantly higher heart rate (95.7 ± 9.1 vs 90.2 ± 8.9; P = .012), energy expenditure per minute (4.6 ± 1.23 vs 3.8 ± 1.2; P = .007), and minute ventilation (19.0 ± 3.0 vs 15.5 ± 3.3; P < .001) compared to TKA.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons experience significantly higher physiological strain and stress while performing THA. While scheduling THAs and TKAs, surgeons should consider the higher physical demand associated with THAs and ensure adequate personal preparation and sequence of cases.

Rural Hospital Designation Is Associated With Increased Complications and Resource Utilization After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

As the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis increases, the demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has grown. It is known that patients in rural and urban geographic locations undergo THA at similar rates. This study explores the relationship between geographic location and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the Truven MarketScan database was used to identify patients who underwent primary THA between January 2010 and December 2018. Patients with prior hip fracture, infection, and/or avascular necrosis were excluded. Two cohorts were created based on geographic locations: urban vs rural (rural denotes any incorporated place with fewer than 2500 inhabitants). Age, gender, and obesity were used for one-to-one matching between cohorts. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, postoperative complications, and resource utilization were statistically compared between the cohorts using multivariate conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 18,712 patients were included for analysis (9356 per cohort). After matching, there were no significant differences in comorbidities between cohorts. The following were more common in rural patients: dislocation within 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.41, P < .001), revision within 1 year (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.32, P = .027), and prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.34, P = .033). Similarly, rural patients had higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.56, P = .041), 90-day readmission (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.26-1.71, P = .023), and extended length of stay (≥3 days; OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.81, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

THA in rural patients is associated with increased cost, healthcare utilization, and complications compared to urban patients. Standardization between geographic areas could reduce this discrepancy.

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement positively correlates with level of training

BACKGROUND

Accurate acetabular component placement may reduce the risk of complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). While surgeon experience and volume may reduce outliers, little is known how cup positioning accuracy and consistency relates to level of training (resident, fellow, attending) and whether trainee level impacts the magnitude and direction of cup placement errors.

METHODS

Ninety patients undergoing posterolateral computer-assisted navigation THA were included for analysis. All surgery was performed by two fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons and assisted by a trainee (orthopedic resident (PGY 1-5) or fellow in adult reconstruction). In order to determine accuracy of cup placement in trainees and attendings, we used computer navigation to determine freehand cup placement by the trainee, then by the attending surgeon. Final cup inclination and version were determined and recorded by computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comparison of consistency in cup inclination and anteversion was made on values obtained by residents, fellows, and attendings and final values provided by the navigation system. In addition, to assess the role of training and repetition, acetabular cup inclination and version were compared between fellows during the first half and the second half of their training year. All comparisons were performed with the Student t-test except for comparison of rate of deviation from the safe zone, which were performed with the chi-square test. The level of significance was defined as p values ≤ 0.05 with 95% confidence interval, and trend toward significance was defined as p values ≤ 0.1.

RESULTS

Inclination deviation from the final position and cup version deviation from the final position were statistically significant between resident vs attendings (p < 0.001 (inclination), p < 0.001 (version)), fellow vs attendings (p < 0.001 (inclination), p < 0.001 (version)), and all trainee vs attendings (p < 0.001 (inclination), p < 0.001 (version)). In all comparisons, the attending surgeons placed the cup closer to the final cup position than both resident and fellows. Proportion of inclination deviation from the safe zone of residents was significantly higher than of attendings (p < 0.001) but no significant difference was observed between fellows and attending (p = 1.00). Compared to residents, fellows demonstrated lower proportion of inclination deviation from the safe zone of 3.3% vs 23.3% for fellows vs residents (p = 0.002) and tended to implant the cups in a more horizontal position (45.6 ± 6.6° [SD] and 42.7 ± 4.3°, respectively, p = 0.04). Compared to fellow, residents tended to implant the cup in a more anteverted position than the final cup version (9.6 ± 6.7° and 6.74 ± 5.6° [SD], p = 0.034). There was no statistically significant difference in cup position between attendings' free-hand and final (computer assisted) cup placement.

CONCLUSION

Accurate and consistent acetabular cup placement improves with level of training. Accurate and consistent acetabular cup version is harder to master as compared to acetabular cup inclination.

Comparative Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Between Arthroplasty and Nonarthroplasty Fellowship Trained Surgeons

Background

An adult reconstruction (AR) fellowship is designed to provide advanced training for a broad range of primary reconstructive and complex knee revision surgeries. This study aims to identify outcome differences between primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed by AR fellowship-trained surgeons and non-AR (NAR) fellowship-trained surgeons.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 7415 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2016 to 2020. Two cohorts were established based on whether the operation was performed by an AR or NAR fellowship-trained surgeon. Demographic, clinical data, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at various time-points (preoperatively, 3 months, 1 year). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Primary outcomes were compared using multilinear regressions, controlling for demographic differences.

Results

AR surgeons performed 5194 (70%) cases while NAR surgeons performed 2221 (30%) cases. Surgical time (minutes) significantly differed between the 2 groups (101.26 vs 111.56; P < .001). Length of stay, 90-day all-cause readmissions, revisions, and all-cause emergency department visits did not statistically differ (P = .079, P = .978, P = .094, and P = .241, respectively). AR surgeons were more likely to discharge their patients home than NAR surgeons (P = .001). NAR group reported lower KOOS, JR scores at 3 months and 1 year (preop: 45.30 vs 45.79, P = .728; 3 months: 64.73 vs 59.47, P < .001; 1 year: 71.66 vs 69.56, P = .234); however, only 3-month scores statistically differed. Veterans RAND-12 Physical and Mental components scores (VR-12 PCS and MCS) were not statistically significant at any time-point between the cohorts. Delta-improvements preoperatively to 1 year in KOOS, JR (26.36 vs 23.77; P < .001) and VR-12 PCS (11.98 vs 10.62; P < .001) scores were significantly higher for the AR cohort but did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates significantly shorter surgical times and greater improvements in KOOS, JR and VR-12 PCS scores associated with TKAs performed by AR fellowship-trained surgeons.

Level III Evidence

Retrospective Cohort Study.