1
|
Tubin N, Bourget-Murray J, Bureau A, Morris J, Ann Azad M, Abdelbary H, Grammatopoulos G, Garceau S. Lower Rates of Re-Operation Following Partial or Complete Revision Arthroplasty Compared to Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Early Postoperative and Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Hip Infection. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00270-5. [PMID: 38531489 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to: 1) compare treatment outcomes between debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and partial or complete revision arthroplasty (RA) for early postoperative and acute hematogenous total hip arthroplasty (THA) periprosthetic joint injection (PJI) and 2) identify factors associated with treatment outcome. METHODS The study consisted of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent surgery for PJI between 2004 and 2021. There were 76 patients (74.5%) who underwent DAIR and 26 patients (25.5%) who underwent RA. Treatment success was defined as treatment eradication at a minimum of a 2-year follow up. Bivariate regression analysis was used to assess the effect of different factors on treatment outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was performed to compare survivorship between cohorts. RESULTS At a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (range, 2.2 to 16.4 years), significantly more DAIR failed treatment (DAIR, 50 [65.8%]; 10 [38.5%]; P = 0.015). The 8-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 35.1% [95% CI (confidence interval), 24.3 to 45.9] for patients treated with DAIR and 61.5% [95% CI, 42.9 to 80.1] for those treated with RA (Log Rank = 0.039). Bivariate regression analysis showed performing a RA was associated with a higher likelihood of treatment success (OR [odds ratio] 4.499, 95% CI 1.600 to 12.647, P = 0.004), whereas a higher BMI (Body Mass Index) was associated with treatment failure (OR 0.934, 95% CI 0.878 to 0.994, P = 0.032). CONCLUSION To reduce the rate of recalcitrant infection following early postoperative or acute hematogenous THA PJI, RA may be of benefit over DAIR. This is especially relevant in the early post-operative period, when components can be readily exchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Tubin
- Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Jonathan Bourget-Murray
- Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Antoine Bureau
- Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jared Morris
- Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Marisa Ann Azad
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Hesham Abdelbary
- Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - George Grammatopoulos
- Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Simon Garceau
- Department of Surgery, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baertl S, Renz N, Alt V, Perka C, Kirschbaum S. [Acute postoperative infections after dual head arthroplasty in geriatric patients]. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb) 2024; 127:110-116. [PMID: 37853237 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01376-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after dual head arthroplasty represent a major challenge with a 1-year mortality rate up to 50% in the mostly multimorbid geriatric patient collective. Due to the limited possibilities of preoperative patient optimization, infection rates of up to 9% have been reported, which is significantly higher than in elective arthroplasty. A therapeutic gold standard has not yet been established due to the heterogeneous study situation and the lack of prospective randomized studies. The most promising therapeutic option currently appears to be a single-stage stem replacement in combination with implantation of a cup component (conversion to total hip arthroplasty, infection eradication in up to 100%). An approach of débridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR) alone shows significantly poorer success rates (16-82%). Surgical treatment should always be followed by antibiotic treatment with a total duration of 12 weeks. In addition to the established perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement seems to be superior to cementless stem fixation in preventing PJI in dual head arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Baertl
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Nora Renz
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Volker Alt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Carsten Perka
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Stephanie Kirschbaum
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kew ME, Mathew JI, Wimberly AC, Fu MC, Taylor SA, Blaine TA, Carli AV, Dines JS, Dines DM, Gulotta LV. Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:e68-e78. [PMID: 37468030 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty usually have excellent long-term outcomes. However, a subset of patients is diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring revision procedures and prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder PJI in patients undergoing débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. We also sought to compare outcomes and complications across procedures. METHODS Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with PJI after primary shoulder arthroplasty between January 2010 and August 2021. Patients were included if they underwent treatment with DAIR, single-stage revision, or 2-stage revision. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, laboratory data, postoperative antibiotic regimen, and infectious pathogen were collected. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Scale, and PROMIS Upper Extremity. Chi-square, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate each factor. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were included in the study, 26% treated with DAIR, 9% treated with single-stage revision, and 65% treated with 2-stage revision. There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities. Patients undergoing DAIR were diagnosed significantly earlier than those undergoing single- and 2-stage revision procedures (12.6 ± 22.9 months vs. 49.6 ± 48.4 vs. 25.0 ± 26.6, P = .010). Recurrent PJI was noted in 23.1% of patients: 29.4% of DAIR patients, no single-stage patients, and 23.8% of 2-stage patients (P = .330). Patients undergoing 2-stage revision with treatment failure had a significantly higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.9, P = .027). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes across groups. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing treatment of shoulder PJI with DAIR did not have an increased rate of reinfection compared with single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. Patients treated with DAIR were diagnosed with PJI significantly earlier than those undergoing single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between groups. This information adds to the body of work detailing outcomes after DAIR for shoulder PJI and provides encouraging data for use in this patient population. Future studies with a larger sample size may be conducted to further investigate specific pathogens, infection timelines, and antibiotic regimens that reduce the risk of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E Kew
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Audrey C Wimberly
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel A Taylor
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Theodore A Blaine
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto V Carli
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua S Dines
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - David M Dines
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lawrence V Gulotta
- Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Longo UG, De Salvatore S, Bandini B, Lalli A, Barillà B, Budhiparama NC, Lustig S. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention ( DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review. J ISAKOS 2024; 9:62-70. [PMID: 37714518 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents one of the most fearsome complications of joint replacement. No international consensus has been reached regarding the best approach for early prosthetic knee and hip infections. The aim of this updated systematic review is to assess whether debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective choice of treatment in early postoperative and acute hematogenous PJI. METHODS This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The diagnostic criteria defining a PJI, the most present pathogen, and the days between the index procedure and the onset of the PJI were extracted from the selected articles. Additionally, the mean follow-up, antibiotic regimen, and success rate of the treatment were also reported. RESULTS The articles included provided a cohort of 970 patients. Ten studies specified the joint of their cohort in PJIs regarding either hip prostheses or knee prostheses, resulting in 454 total knees and 460 total hips. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 92 years old. Success rates for the DAIR treatments in the following cohort ranged from 55.5% up to a maximum of 90% (mean value of 71%). CONCLUSION Even though the DAIR procedure is quite limited, it is still considered an effective option for patients developing an early post-operative or acute hematogenous PJI. However, there is a lack of studies, in particular randomized control trials (RCTs), comparing DAIR with one-stage and two-stage revision protocols in the setting of early PJIs, reflecting the necessity to conduct further high-quality studies to face the burden of early PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umile Giuseppe Longo
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy; Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
| | - Sergio De Salvatore
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy; Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
| | - Benedetta Bandini
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy; Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
| | - Alberto Lalli
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy; Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
| | - Bruno Barillà
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Roma, Italy; Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
| | | | - Sebastien Lustig
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cortes-Penfield N, Krsak M, Damioli L, Henry M, Seidelman J, Hewlett A, Certain L. How We Approach Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy Following Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Prosthetic Joint Infection. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:188-198. [PMID: 37590953 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains uncertain. Patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) receive extended antimicrobial treatment, and some experts leave patients at perceived highest risk of relapse on suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). In this narrative review, we synthesize the literature concerning the role of SAT to prevent treatment failure following DAIR, attempting to answer 3 key questions: (1) What factors identify patients at highest risk for treatment failure after DAIR (ie, patients with the greatest potential to benefit from SAT), (2) Does SAT reduce the rate of treatment failure after DAIR, and (3) What are the rates of treatment failure and adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation in patients receiving SAT? We conclude by proposing risk-benefit stratification criteria to guide use of SAT after DAIR for PJI, informed by the limited available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Cortes-Penfield
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Martin Krsak
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Laura Damioli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Henry
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Seidelman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angela Hewlett
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Laura Certain
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Szymski D, Walter N, Hierl K, Rupp M, Alt V. Direct Hospital Costs per Case of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections in Europe - A Systematic Review. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00032-9. [PMID: 38266688 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rise of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) due to aging populations is steadily increasing the number of arthroplasties and treatment costs. This study analyzed the direct health care costs of PJI for total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Europe. METHODS The databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically screened for direct costs of PJI in Europe. Publications that defined the joint site and the procedure performed were further analyzed. Mean direct health care costs were calculated for debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage, and 2-stage revisions for hip and knee PJI, respectively. Costs were adjusted for inflation rates and reported in US-Dollar (USD). RESULTS Of 1,374 eligible publications, 12 manuscripts were included in the final analysis after an abstract and full-text review. Mean direct costs of $32,933 were identified for all types of revision procedures for knee PJI. The mean direct treatment cost including DAIR for TKA after PJI was $19,476. For 2-stage revisions of TKA, the mean total cost was $37,980. For all types of hip PJI procedures, mean direct hospital costs were $28,904. For hip DAIR, one-stage and 2-stage treatment average costs of $7,120, $44,594, and $42,166 were identified, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Periprosthetic joint infections are associated with substantial direct health care costs. As detailed reports on the cost of PJI are scarce and of limited quality, more detailed financial data on the cost of PJI treatment are urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Szymski
- Department for Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nike Walter
- Department for Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Katja Hierl
- Department for Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Rupp
- Department for Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Volker Alt
- Department for Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rico Nieto A, Loeches Yagüe B, Quiles Melero I, Talavera Buedo G, Pizones J, Fernández-Baillo Sacristana N. [Translated article] Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2024:S1888-4415(24)00033-X. [PMID: 38232934 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same. RESULTS Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main aetiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimised according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rico Nieto
- Unidad de Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
| | - B Loeches Yagüe
- Unidad de Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Quiles Melero
- Servicio de Microbiología y Parasitología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Talavera Buedo
- Unidad de Raquis, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Pizones
- Unidad de Raquis, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zunarelli R, Fiore M, Lonardo G, Pace A, Persiani V, De Paolis M, Sambri A. Total Ankle Replacement Infections: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7711. [PMID: 38137779 PMCID: PMC10743530 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic infection (PJI) after TAR is a serious complication, often requiring further surgery, including revision arthroplasty, conversion to ankle arthrodesis, or even amputation. This systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence on the management of TAR PJI and provide a comprehensive overview of this topic, especially from an epidemiologic point of view. Three different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant articles, and further references were obtained by cross-referencing. Seventy-one studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on cases of TAR PJI. A total of 298 PJIs were retrieved. The mean incidence of PJI was 3.8% (range 0.2-26.1%). Furthermore, 53 (17.8%) were acute PJIs, whereas most of them (156, 52.3%) were late PJIs. Most of the studies were heterogeneous regarding the treatment protocols used, with a two-stage approach performed in most of the cases (107, 35.9%). While the prevalence of ankle PJI remains low, it is potentially one of the most devastating complications of TAR. This review highlights the lack of strong literature regarding TAR infections, thus highlighting a need for multicentric studies with homogeneous data regarding the treatment of ankle PJI to better understand outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrea Sambri
- Orthopedic and Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (R.Z.); (M.F.); (G.L.); (A.P.); (V.P.); (M.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Awad F, Boktor J, Joseph V, Lewis MH, Silva C, Sarasin S, Lewis PM. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention ( DAIR) following hip and knee arthroplasty: results and findings of a multidisciplinary approach from a non-specialist prosthetic infection centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023. [PMID: 37983007 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication following arthroplasty surgery. Recently a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure has gained popularity for PJI where a thorough debridement, irrigation and modular component exchange is undertaken. METHOD We present the outcome for DAIR, data collected prospectively, in a busy orthopaedic unit but not one specialising in PJI. All patients with PJI were included without loss of data or patients from 2012 to 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. RESULTS Four total knee replacements, 17 total hip replacements, one revision total hip replacement and three hip hemiarthroplasties are included with an average duration from onset of symptoms to the DAIR procedure of 11 days (range 1-22 days). Staphylococcus aureus (24%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (32%) were the most common causative organisms, and the most common antibiotic regimens included intravenous teicoplanin and flucloxacillin. Average follow-up was 67 months (range 9-104 months). Only four patients went on to require revision surgery. An analysis of midterm patient outcome measures for 6 of the total hip replacement (THR) DAIR patients were compared with a database of 792 THRs (with a minimum two-year follow-up) carried out by the same surgeon revealed no significant difference in Oxford hip scores at one-year post-surgery (OHS DAIR 36.2 vs 39 for control group). CONCLUSION This study includes 25 consecutive patients treated with DAIR with only one reinfection, with a mean follow-up period of 5 years. Using a strict protocol, DAIR appears to offer a successful treatment strategy for the management of early PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Awad
- Prince Charles Hospital, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eriksson HK, Lazarinis S, Järhult JD, Hailer NP. Early Staphylococcal Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) Treated with Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention ( DAIR): Inferior Outcomes in Patients with Staphylococci Resistant to Rifampicin. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1589. [PMID: 37998791 PMCID: PMC10668653 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12111589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
It is unknown how rifampicin resistance in staphylococci causing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects outcomes after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). We thus aimed to compare the risk of relapse in DAIR-treated early PJI caused by staphylococci with or without rifampicin resistance. In total, 81 patients affected by early PJI were included, and all patients were treated surgically with DAIR. This was repeated if needed. The endpoint of relapse-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were fitted to assess the risk of infection relapse for patients infected with rifampicin-resistant bacteria, adjusted for age, sex, type of joint, and type of index surgery. In patients with rifampicin-resistant staphylococci, relapse was seen in 80% after one DAIR procedure and in 70% after two DAIR procedures. In patients with rifampicin-sensitive bacteria, 51% had an infection relapse after one DAIR procedure and 33% had an infection relapse after two DAIR procedures. Patients with rifampicin-resistant staphylococcal PJI thus had an increased adjusted risk of infection relapse of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1-3.6, p = 0.04) after one DAIR procedure compared to patients with rifampicin-sensitive bacteria and a 4.1-fold (95% CI: 1.2-14.1, p = 0.03) increase in risk of infection relapse after two DAIR procedures. Staphylococcal resistance to rifampicin is associated with inferior outcomes after DAIR. These findings suggest that DAIR may not be a useful strategy in early PJI caused by rifampicin-resistant staphylococci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K. Eriksson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden; (S.L.); (N.P.H.)
| | - Stergios Lazarinis
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden; (S.L.); (N.P.H.)
| | - Josef D. Järhult
- Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden;
| | - Nils P. Hailer
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, 751 83 Uppsala, Sweden; (S.L.); (N.P.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pérez-Prieto D, Pardo A, Fontanellas A, Gómez-Junyent J, Hinarejos P, Monllau JC. Incidence, functional outcomes and cure rate of hematogenous infection in a 2,498 Total Knee Arthroplasties cohort. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10:96. [PMID: 37743403 PMCID: PMC10518300 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00656-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary aim of the present study is to report the late acute hematogenous (LAH) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) cure rate following Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated by means of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in a long-term follow-up. The secondary purpose is to report the functional outcomes at that follow-up and to compare them with a non-infected group. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study cohort consists of 2,498 TKA performed from September 2005 to April 2010 that had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The diagnosis of PJI and classification into LAH was done in accordance with the Zimmerli criteria. The primary outcome was the failure rate, defined as death before the end of antibiotic treatment, a further surgical intervention for treatment of infection, life-long antibiotic suppressive treatment or chronic infection. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes. RESULTS Ten patients were diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI during the study period (0.4%). All of them were managed with DAIR, which was performed by a knee surgeon and/or PJI surgeon. The failure rate was 0% at the 8.5-year (SD, 2.4) follow-up mark. The KSS score was 82.1 vs. 84.1 (p n.s.) at final follow-up. CONCLUSION Although the literature suggests that TKA DAIR for LAH periprosthetic joint infection is associated with high rates of failure, the results presented here suggest a high cure rate with good functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Pérez-Prieto
- Hospital del Mar - Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Passeig Marítim, 25, Barcelona, Spain.
- IcatKnee, Hospital Universitari Dexeus - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Albert Pardo
- Hospital del Mar - Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Passeig Marítim, 25, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Fontanellas
- Hospital del Mar - Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Passeig Marítim, 25, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Gómez-Junyent
- Hospital del Mar - Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Passeig Marítim, 25, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Hinarejos
- Hospital del Mar - Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Passeig Marítim, 25, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan-Carles Monllau
- Hospital del Mar - Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Passeig Marítim, 25, Barcelona, Spain
- IcatKnee, Hospital Universitari Dexeus - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rico Nieto A, Loeches Yagüe B, Quiles Melero I, Talavera Buedo G, Pizones J, Fernández-Baillo Sacristana N. Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2023:S1888-4415(23)00189-3. [PMID: 37690513 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same. RESULTS Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main etiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimized according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rico Nieto
- Unidad de Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España.
| | - B Loeches Yagüe
- Unidad de Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - I Quiles Melero
- Servicio de Microbiología y Parasitología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - G Talavera Buedo
- Unidad de Raquis, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - J Pizones
- Unidad de Raquis, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Krizsán G, Sallai I, Veres DS, Prinz G, Kovács M, Skaliczki G. Investigation of the effect of rifampicin resistance and risk factors on recovery rates after DAIR procedure in patients with prosthetic joint infection. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:611. [PMID: 37605214 PMCID: PMC10441700 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04091-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rifampicin plays a key role in the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), however, the emergence of rifampicin resistance is associated with less favourable clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of rifampicin resistance and other patient-related factors on recovery rates among patients with PJI undergoing debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). METHODS We reviewed medical records and microbiology reports of 67 patients (37 males and 30 females) undergoing DAIR due to PJI between 2014 and 2021. Patient-related factors, co-morbidities and microbiological reports were collected and reviewed. Forty-four patients had hip, 21 had knee, 1 had shoulder and 1 had elbow joint infection. Obtained data were statistically analysed with a logistic regression model. RESULTS Rifampicin-sensitive organism was isolated in 47 cases. Recovery rate was 72.3% in the sensitive and 76.9% in the resistant group. We found no significant effect of rifampicin resistance on the probability of recovery. Age and diabetes mellitus showed negative clinical impact on recovery. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci were predominant in the rifampicin-sensitive (66.6% of the isolates) and Gram-negative rods in the resistant group (65.2%). CONCLUSIONS Based on our results, higher age and diabetes mellitus may have a clinically relevant negative impact on clinical outcome, however, this effect was not statistically significant. This may be due to the limited number of patients included in this study. We observed no clinically relevant effect of rifampicin-resistance, sex and body mass index (BMI) on recovery rates among patients undergoing DAIR due to PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gergely Krizsán
- Department of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Imre Sallai
- Department of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dániel Sándor Veres
- Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gyula Prinz
- Department of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Máté Kovács
- Department of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Skaliczki
- Department of Orthopaedics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huotari K, Vuorinen M, Vasara A. Debridement, antimicrobials, and implant retention in the treatment of late acute and early acute Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections. Infect Dis (Lond) 2023; 55:525-532. [PMID: 37255321 DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2023.2217898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staphylococcus aureus is the most common microbe in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Debridement, antimicrobials, and implant retention (DAIR) are often-recommended treatment modality for acute PJIs, even though it has had relatively poor outcomes in some studies. In this study, we wanted to examine treatment results with a multidisciplinary team in a specialised centre and obtain further information for treatment decisions in acute Staphylococcus aureus PJIs. METHODS All consecutive haematogenous late acute and postoperative early acute hip and knee Staphylococcus aureus PJIs treated with DAIR during 2011-2016 were included in this retrospective study. DAIR within three weeks from symptom onset and the exchange of modular parts were required. RESULTS Eighty-five acute Staphylococcus aureus PJIs were treated with DAIR in 83 patients: 28 late acute and 57 early acute PJIs. The late acute PJI patients were older and had malignancies more often than the early acute PJI patients. Bacteraemia was present in 50.6% of Staphylococcus aureus PJI patients, more often in late acute (73.1%) than in early acute (40.4%) patients (p = .006). The implant was retained in 80.0%: 89.3% of the late acute and 75.4% of the early acute PJIs. In 17 joints, DAIR failed and the joint had to be removed. Fourteen of these joints were successfully replaced. One infection-related death occurred. The one-year all-cause mortality rate was 3.6%. Suppressive antimicrobial treatment was given to 22 (26.5%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Reasonably good treatment results for acute Staphylococcus aureus PJIs are achievable by DAIR in a specialised centre with a strict treatment protocol and a multidisciplinary team. If the DAIR fails, a two-stage exchange is usually still possible, with good results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaisa Huotari
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku Vuorinen
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna Vasara
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McAleese T, Ahmed A, Berney M, O’Riordan R, Cleary M. Kocuria rhizophila prosthetic hip joint infection. J Surg Case Rep 2023; 2023:rjad484. [PMID: 37662443 PMCID: PMC10469548 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
We present the first case report of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Kocuria rhizophila. Our patient is a 74-year-old male who underwent primary total hip replacement for right hip pain. His recovery was uneventful until 6 weeks postoperatively when he presented to his routine outpatient appointment with significant erythema, swelling, and tenderness over his right hip wound. Based on the acuity of his symptoms and the radiological findings, it was determined that the patient should undergo debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR procedure). A consensus decision was also made at our PJI multidisciplinary meeting to treat him with 12 weeks of IV antibiotics. After completing this 12 weeks course of IV Vancomycin, his inflammatory markers returned to normal limits. At 6 months follow-up, our patient was mobilizing independently without any signs of infection recurrence. His radiographs showed the implant was in a satisfactory position with no evidence of loosening. This case adds to an emerging body of literature describing invasive infections associated with Kocuria species. We have demonstrated the effectiveness of managing this condition with debridement, implant retention, and IV Vancomycin therapy for 12 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy McAleese
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, D02 YN77, Ireland
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Rd, Waterford, X91ER8E, Ireland
| | - Aathir Ahmed
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, D02 YN77, Ireland
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Rd, Waterford, X91ER8E, Ireland
| | - Mark Berney
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Rd, Waterford, X91ER8E, Ireland
| | - Ruth O’Riordan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Rd, Waterford, X91ER8E, Ireland
| | - May Cleary
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Rd, Waterford, X91ER8E, Ireland
- Department of Orthopaedics, University College Cork, College Rd, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bartsch A, Krenn P, Lubberts B, Morgenstern M, Pagenstert G, Clauss M. Management of acute periprosthetic knee infection: a comparison of arthroscopic and open debridement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:4309-4316. [PMID: 36735051 PMCID: PMC10293353 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04782-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In acute periprosthetic knee infections, debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is the preferred treatment prior to one- and two-stage revisions. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic and open debridement of infected primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed clinical, laboratory, and antibiotic treatment data, collected in patients with periprosthetic knee infection treated with DAIR at a Swiss Level 1 orthopedic and trauma center over a 10-year period between January 2005 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria were primary total knee arthroplasty and early postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The primary endpoint was the need for further revision surgery due to persistent infection. The secondary endpoint was the prosthesis salvage in further infection surgeries. RESULTS Forty-two patients with 44 acute or hematogenous periprosthetic knee infections were included. We recorded 20 recurrent infections (45%) in our study population: 10 (77%) out of 13 in the arthroscopic DAIR group and 10 (32%) out of 31 in the open DAIR group. Two-stage revision, meaning complete removal of the TKA, insertion of a spacer and replantation at a second stage, had to be performed in three patients treated initially arthroscopically (23%) and in six patients treated initially with an open surgical procedure (21%). CONCLUSIONS Open debridement for acute periprosthetic knee infection shows clear benefits in terms of infection eradication and prosthesis salvage compared to arthroscopic DAIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bartsch
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - P Krenn
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B Lubberts
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Morgenstern
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G Pagenstert
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Clarahof Praxisgemeinschaft für Orthopädie Basel, Clarahofweg 19a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Clauss
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maritati M, Manfrini M, Iaquinta MR, Trentini A, Seraceni S, Guarino M, Costanzini A, De Giorgio R, Zanoli GA, Borghi A, Mazzoni E, De Rito G, Contini C. Acute Prosthetic Joint Infections with Poor Outcome Caused by Staphylococcus Aureus Strains Producing the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1767. [PMID: 37371862 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) producing the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) affects the outcome of Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). Patients with acute and chronic PJI sustained by SA were prospectively enrolled at the orthopedic unit of "Casa di Cura Santa Maria Maddalena", from January 2019 to October 2021. PJI diagnosis was reached according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Consensus Meeting on PJI of Philadelphia. Synovial fluid obtained via joint aspirations was collected in order to isolate SA. The detection of PVL was performed via real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The outcome assessment was performed using the criteria of the Delphi-based International Multidisciplinary Consensus. Twelve cases of PJI caused by SA were included. Nine (75%) cases were acute PJI treated using debridement, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR); the remaining three (25%) were chronic PJI treated using two-stage (n = 2) and one-stage revision (n = 1), respectively. The SA strains that tested positive for PVL genes were 5/12 (41.6%,). Treatment failure was documented in three cases of acute PJI treated using DAIR, all supported by SA-PVL strains (p < 0.045). The remaining two cases were chronic PJI treated with a revision arthroplasty (one and two stage, respectively), with a 100% eradication rate in a medium follow-up of 24 months. Although a small case series, our study showed a 100% failure rate in acute PJI, probably caused by SA PVL-producing strains treated conservatively (p < 0.04). In this setting, toxin research should guide radical surgical treatment and targeted antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Maritati
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases and Dermatology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Orthopaedic Ward, Casa di Cura Santa Maria Maddalena, Via Gorizia, Occhiobello, 45030 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Marco Manfrini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Centre for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 64/B, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Maria Rosa Iaquinta
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 64/B, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Trentini
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Silva Seraceni
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases and Dermatology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- RDI Srl Cerba HealthCare, Via Del Santo 147, Limena, 35010 Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Guarino
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Anna Costanzini
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Roberto De Giorgio
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Gustavo Alberto Zanoli
- Orthopaedic Ward, Casa di Cura Santa Maria Maddalena, Via Gorizia, Occhiobello, 45030 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Borghi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases and Dermatology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Elisa Mazzoni
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Rito
- Orthopaedic Ward, Casa di Cura Santa Maria Maddalena, Via Gorizia, Occhiobello, 45030 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Carlo Contini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases and Dermatology Section, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Olearo F, Zanichelli V, Exarchakou A, Both A, Uςkay I, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H. The Impact of Antimicrobial Therapy Duration in the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections Depending on Surgical Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad246. [PMID: 37265666 PMCID: PMC10230567 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to address the question if short antibiotic treatment (SAT; at least 4 but <12 weeks) versus long antibiotic treatment (LAT) affects outcomes in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Database research (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane) retrieved 3740 articles, of which 10 studies were included in the analysis. Compared to LAT, 11% lower odds of treatment failure in the SAT group were found, although the difference was not statistically significant (pooled odds ratio, 0.89 [95% confidence interval, .53-1.50]). No difference in treatment failure was found between SAT and LAT once stratified by type of surgery, studies conducted in the United States versus Europe, study design, and follow-up. There is still no conclusive evidence that antibiotic treatment of PJIs for 12 weeks or longer is associated with better outcomes, irrespective of the type of surgical procedure. Most recent, high-quality studies tend to favor longer antibiotic courses, making them preferable in most situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flaminia Olearo
- Correspondence: Prof. Holger Rohde, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany (); Flaminia Olearo, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany ()
| | - Veronica Zanichelli
- Departement of Infectious Diseases, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aimilia Exarchakou
- Department of Noncommunicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Both
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ilker Uςkay
- Infectiology, Balgrist University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Aepfelbacher
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Rohde
- Correspondence: Prof. Holger Rohde, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany (); Flaminia Olearo, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany ()
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rahardja R, Zhu M, Davis JS, Manning L, Metcalf S, Young SW. Success of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study of 189 Cases. J Arthroplasty 2023:S0883-5403(23)00370-4. [PMID: 37084921 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify the success rate of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large prospective cohort of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The ability for different PJI classification systems to predict success was assessed. METHODS Prospective data recorded in the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) study was analyzed. 189 newly diagnosed knee PJIs were managed with DAIR between July 2014 and December 2017. Patients were prospectively followed up for 2 years. A strict definition of success was used, requiring the patient being alive with documented absence of infection, no ongoing antibiotics and the index prosthesis in place. Success was compared against the Coventry (early PJI = ≤1 month), International Consensus Meeting (early = ≤90 days), Auckland (early = <1 year), and Tsukayama (early = ≤1 month, hematogenous = >1 month with <7 days symptoms, chronic = >1 month with >7 days symptoms) classifications. RESULTS DAIR success was 45% (85/189) and was highest in early PJIs defined according to the Coventry (adjusted odds ratio [aOdds Ratio (OR)] = 3.9, P=0.01), the ICM (aOR = 3.1, p=0.01), and the Auckland classifications (aOR = 2.6, P=0.01). Success was lower in both hematogenous (aOR = 0.4, P=0.03) and chronic infections (aOR = 0.1, P=0.003). CONCLUSION Time since primary TKA is an important predictor of DAIR success. Success was highest in infections occurring <1 month of the primary TKA and progressively decreased as time since the primary TKA increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Rahardja
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Mark Zhu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Joshua S Davis
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laurens Manning
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Sarah Metcalf
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Simon W Young
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Indelli PF, Ghirardelli S, Valpiana P, Bini L, Festini M, Iannotti F. Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) in the Treatment of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infections: A Consecutive Series. Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12040605. [PMID: 37111491 PMCID: PMC10143842 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12040605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) represent a devastating consequence following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). In this study, the authors describe a modified surgical technique developed to enhance the classical irrigation and debridement procedure (DAIR) to improve the possibilities of retaining an acutely infected TJA. MATERIALS AND METHODS This technique, debridement antibiotic pearls and retention of the implant (DAPRI), aims to remove the intra-articular biofilm allowing a higher and prolonged local antibiotic concentration by using calcium sulphate antibiotic-added beads in a setting of acute (<4 weeks from symptoms onset) PJI with pathogen identification. The combination of three different surgical techniques (tumor-like synovectomy, argon beam/acetic acid application and chlorhexidine gluconate brushing) aims to remove the bacterial biofilm from the implant without explanting the original hardware. RESULTS In total, 62 patients met the acute infection criteria (<4 weeks of symptoms); there were 57 males and five females. The patients' average age at the time of treatment was 71 years (62-77) and the average BMI was 37 kg/m2. The micro-organism, always identified through synovial fluid analysis (culture, multiplex PCR or Next Generation Sequencing), was an aerobic Gram + in 76% (S. Coag-Neg 41%; S. aureus 16%), Gram-in 10% (E. coli 4%) and anaerobic Gram + in 4%. The DAPRI treatment was performed at an average of 3 days from symptoms onset (1-7 days). All patients underwent a 12-week course of post-operative antibiotic therapy (6 weeks I.V. and 6 weeks oral). All patients were available at the 2-year minimum FU (24-84 months). A total of 48 (77.5%) patients were infection-free at the final FU, while 14 patients underwent 2-stage revision for PJI recurrence. In total, four patients (6.4%) had a prolonged drainage from the wound after placement of the calcium sulphate beads. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the DAPRI technique could represent a valid alternative to the classic DAIR procedure. The current authors do not recommend this procedure outside of the main inclusive criteria (acute scenario micro-organism identification).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Francesco Indelli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
- Südtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, 39042 Brixen, Italy
| | - Stefano Ghirardelli
- Orthoapedic Sports Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
- Institute for Biomechanics, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Pieralberto Valpiana
- Südtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, 39042 Brixen, Italy
- Institute for Biomechanics, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lorenzo Bini
- School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | | | - Ferdinando Iannotti
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, San Paolo Hospital, 00053 Civitavecchia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Steadman W, Chapman PR, Schuetz M, Schmutz B, Trampuz A, Tetsworth K. Local Antibiotic Delivery Options in Prosthetic Joint Infection. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12040752. [PMID: 37107114 PMCID: PMC10134995 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) causes significant morbidity and mortality for patients globally. Delivery of antibiotics to the site of infection has potential to improve the treatment outcomes and enhance biofilm eradication. These antibiotics can be delivered using an intra-articular catheter or combined with a carrier substance to enhance pharmacokinetic properties. Carrier options include non-resorbable polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement and resorbable calcium sulphate, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and hydrogels. PMMA allows for creation of structural spacers used in multi-stage revision procedures, however it requires subsequent removal and antibiotic compatibility and the levels delivered are variable. Calcium sulphate is the most researched resorbable carrier in PJI, but is associated with wound leakage and hypercalcaemia, and clinical evidence for its effectiveness remains at the early stage. Hydrogels provide a versatile combability with antibiotics and adjustable elution profiles, but clinical usage is currently limited. Novel anti-biofilm therapies include bacteriophages which have been used successfully in small case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Steadman
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Paul R Chapman
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Herston Infectious Disease Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
| | - Michael Schuetz
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Beat Schmutz
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
- Australian Research Council Training Centre for Multiscale 3D Imaging, Modelling, and Manufacturing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Septic Unit Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane 4029, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4029, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Deckey DG, Christopher ZK, Bingham JS, Spangehl MJ. Principles of mechanical and chemical debridement with implant retention. Arthroplasty 2023; 5:16. [PMID: 37020248 PMCID: PMC10077701 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00170-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most common causes of early revision for total hip and knee arthroplasty. Mechanical and chemical debridement typically referred to as debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) can be a successful technique to eradicate PJI in acute postoperative or acute hematogenous infections. This review will focus specifically on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of DAIR. DISCUSSION The success of mechanical and chemical debridement, or a DAIR operation, is reliant on a combination of appropriate patient selection and meticulous technique. There are many technical considerations to take into consideration. One of the most important factors in the success of the DAIR procedure is the adequacy of mechanical debridement. Techniques are surgeon-specific and perhaps contribute to the large variability in the literature on the success of DAIR. Factors that have been shown to be associated with success include the exchange of modular components, performing the procedure within seven days or less of symptom onset, and possibly adjunctive rifampin or fluoroquinolone therapy, though this remains controversial. Factors that have been associated with failure include rheumatoid arthritis, age greater than 80 years, male sex, chronic renal failure, liver cirrhosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSIONS DAIR is an effective treatment option for the management of an acute postoperative or hematogenous PJI in the appropriately selected patient with well-fixed implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Deckey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | | | - Joshua S Bingham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Mark J Spangehl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Quarto E, Formica M. Periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: treatment options and outcomes. What is the current evidence in literature? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:1031-1039. [PMID: 35303146 PMCID: PMC9925597 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) will increase. The aim of this review is to evaluate current evidence regarding treatment options, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of PJI management in UKAs. METHODS A systematic review of English literature was performed. Retrospective and prospective studies providing treatment options, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of PJI following UKAs were included. PJI type, treatment, survival rate with no reoperation for infection and survival rate with no reoperation for any cause were evaluated. RESULTS Eleven articles were included. Three studies focusing on PJI following UKA (45 cases) report a survival rate with no reoperation for infection of 68.9% and a survival rate with no reoperation for any cause of 48.9%. Eight articles concerning UKA failure modes (28 cases) overestimate survival rate with no reoperation for infection (88.9%) and survival rate with no reoperation for any cause (88.9%) (p < 0.05). DAIR reports a rate of infection eradication failure ranging from 43.8 to 100%. 1SE allows for a survival rate with no reoperation for infection of 100%. 2SE reports a rate of infection eradication failure ranging from 0 to 12.5%. A high rate of early aseptic reoperation is reported, despite infection eradication (20% in DAIR; 28.5% in 2SE). CONCLUSIONS Treatment strategy is determined by symptom timing, PJI type (acute vs chronic), causative organism, patient's comorbidities. A longer duration of PJI or severe host and extremity status seems to require 2SE or 1SE. Patients who have a shorter duration of PJI could receive DAIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Zanirato
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Clinica Ortopedica, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, GE, Italy.
- DISC Dipartimento Di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Viale Benedetto XV 6, 16132, Genova, GE, Italy.
| | - Luca Cavagnaro
- Joint Replacement Unit, Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2--Ospedale Santa Corona, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| | - Francesco Chiarlone
- Joint Replacement Unit, Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2--Ospedale Santa Corona, Viale 25 Aprile, 38, 17027, Pietra Ligure, SV, Italy
| | - Emanuele Quarto
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Clinica Ortopedica, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, GE, Italy
- DISC Dipartimento Di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Viale Benedetto XV 6, 16132, Genova, GE, Italy
| | - Matteo Formica
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Clinica Ortopedica, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, GE, Italy
- DISC Dipartimento Di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Viale Benedetto XV 6, 16132, Genova, GE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Humphrey TJ, Salimy MS, Melnic CM, Bedair HS. Dislocation After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:361-6. [PMID: 35995326 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a common treatment option for hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, noninfectious outcomes of DAIR such as instability are not well reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for hip dislocation post-DAIR for PJI of both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS A retrospective chart review identified all patients who underwent DAIR of a primary or revision THA over a 20-year period with a minimum 1-year follow-up. A total of 151 patients met inclusion criteria, 19.9% of whom had a post-DAIR dislocation. Demographic and intraoperative variables were obtained. Patients who had modular components exchanged during DAIR to those with increased offset, increased "jump distance", or a more stable acetabular liner were defined as patients who had "components exchanged to increase stability." Predictors of hip dislocation post-DAIR were inserted into a multivariate linear regression. RESULTS Post-DAIR dislocation rates were 16.3% in primary THAs and 25.4% in revision THAs. In patients who had "components exchanged to increase stability" during hip DAIR, there was at least an 11-fold reduction (1/odds ratio (OR), 0.09) in dislocation risk compared to patients who had no components altered during modular component exchange during hip DAIR (OR, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.44; P < .001), while a 13-fold increased dislocation risk was seen in patients with a history of neuromuscular disease (OR, 13.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-104.09; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS During DAIR of hip PJI, surgeons should consider prophylactically exchanging components to increase stability even if components appear stable intraoperatively.
Collapse
|
25
|
Marinier MC, Mouser B, Ogunsola AS, Elkins JM. 'Tis Time 'Tis Time: The Importance of Operative Time, Thoroughness, and Shakespeare in Dair Procedures in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J 2023; 43:63-70. [PMID: 37383855 PMCID: PMC10296452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Background Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), while rare, are a devasting complication of both total joint arthroplasty (TJA). With most patients undergoing surgical treatment for PJI, options vary between one-stage or two-stage (the gold standard) procedures. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures are a common, less morbid alternative to two-stage revisions, but patients undergoing DAIR procedures more often experience reinfections. This is likely in part due to non-standardized irrigation and debridement (I&D) methods within these procedures. Furthermore, DAIR procedures are often desired due to their cost effectiveness and lesser operative times, but no investigations have occurred regarding operative-time-based outcomes. This study aimed to compare reinfection incidence with procedure time in DAIR procedures. In addition, this study aimed to introduce the novel Macbeth Protocol for the I&D portion of DAIR procedures and assess its efficacy. Methods Records of unilateral DAIR procedures for primary TJA PJI performed by arthroplasty surgeons from 2015-2022 were retrospectively reviewed for patient demographics, select medical history, body mass index (BMI), joint, microbiology, and follow-up data. In addition, a single surgeon's DAIR procedures (for primary and revision TJA) were reviewed and use of The Macbeth Protocol was noted. Results A total of 71 patients (mean age 64.00 ± 12.81 years) who underwent unilateral DAIR were included. Patients with reinfections following their DAIR procedure had significantly (p = 0.034) lower procedure times (93.72 ± 15.01 min) compared to those without reinfections (105.87 ± 21.91 min). Twenty-two patients underwent 28 DAIR procedures by the senior author, where 11 (39.3%) DAIR procedures utilized The Macbeth Protocol. The use of this protocol did not significantly affect reinfection rate (p = 0.364). Conclusion This study concluded that increased operative time led to less reinfections for DAIR procedures treating unilateral primary TJA PJIs. Additionally, this study introduced The Macbeth Protocol, which demonstrated promising potential as an I&D technique despite not showing statistical significance. Arthroplasty surgeons should not sacrifice patient outcomes determined by reinfection rate for decreased operative time. Level of Evidence: III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Marinier
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Bryan Mouser
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Ayobami S. Ogunsola
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jacob M. Elkins
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jeon YS, Kim MK, Kwon DG, Lee SS, Park JW, Kang DS, Ryu DJ. Palliative arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation for infected total knee arthroplasty in high mortality risk patients. Int Orthop 2023; 47:175-186. [PMID: 36401020 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05632-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the infection control rate of palliative arthroscopic debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the high mortality risk or terminal cancer stage patients. METHODS From March 2018 to August 2021, 21 patients met the following inclusion criteria: old age of more than 80, diagnosed as a terminal stage of cancer, high risk of mortality and morbidity representing as Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 5, low daily activity with disabled extremity, and re-infection after two-stage revision. Each patient underwent arthroscopic DAIR and additional continuous irrigation for 48 hours. The need for subsequent re-arthroscopic DAIR or two-stage revision was determined by the post-operative trends of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Infection control was defined as continuing controlled status of infection based on clinical and laboratory results by one or two times of arthroscopic DAIR within initial two months. Treatment failure was defined as more than three times arthroscopic debridement, two-stage revision surgery, or expired due to uncontrolled infection. RESULTS Arthroscopic DAIR controlled the infection in 19 (90.5%) of the 21 cases. The other knee underwent a total of three times of re-arthroscopic DAIR and the other one underwent two-stage revision. Although five patients expired during the follow-up period due to worsening medical problems or terminal cancer, there were no deaths from uncontrolled infection, sepsis, or surgery-related complications. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation for the infection TKA with high mortality risk or terminal cancer patients showed a 90.5% infection control rate. For high-risk patients, arthroscopic debridement with continuous irrigation can be an alternative treatment to improve the quality of life during survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Sang Jeon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Inhang-Ro 27, Jung-Gu, Incheon, 22322, South Korea
| | - Myung Ku Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Inhang-Ro 27, Jung-Gu, Incheon, 22322, South Korea
| | - Dae Gyu Kwon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Inhang-Ro 27, Jung-Gu, Incheon, 22322, South Korea
| | - Sung-Sahn Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Goyang-Si, Korea
| | - Joo Won Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Inhang-Ro 27, Jung-Gu, Incheon, 22322, South Korea
| | - Dong Seok Kang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Inhang-Ro 27, Jung-Gu, Incheon, 22322, South Korea
| | - Dong Jin Ryu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Inhang-Ro 27, Jung-Gu, Incheon, 22322, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Indelli PF, Iannotti F, Ferretti A, Valtanen R, Prati P, Pérez Prieto D, Kort NP, Violante B, Tandogan NR, Schiavone Panni A, Pipino G, Hirschmann MT. "Recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) prevention: the European Knee Associates (EKA)-International Committee American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS)-Arthroplasty Society in Asia (ASIA) survey of members". Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:3932-43. [PMID: 34518895 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06742-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) represent a devastating consequence of total joint arthroplasty. The European Knee Associates (EKA), the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) International Committee, and the Arthroplasty Society in Asia (ASIA) board members were interested in quantifying differences in arthroplasty surgeons' use of various PJI prevention measures to provide clinical recommendations to reduce PJI incidence. METHODS A prospective Microsoft Forms online survey was distributed among EKA, AAHKS International Committee, and ASIA members and their affiliated arthroplasty surgeons. The survey consisted of 20 single and multiple response questions focused on PJI prevention strategies at three perioperative periods: preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. RESULTS Three hundred and ninety-four arthroplasty surgeons from 6 different continents completed the survey. Preoperative: (A) PJI Risk Stratification: 40.6% routinely set thresholds (e.g., BMI, HgbA1C) to be met to qualify for surgery, 36.5% only review past medical history; 9.1% use machine learning to personalize PJI risk; (B) BMI limit: 36% no limit; 15.4% BMI < 35; 30.9% BMI < 40; 17.2% BMI < 45; (C) Nutritional status: 55.3% do not screen; among those who screen their patients (44.7%), albumin is the single most used marker (86.3%); (D) Hyperglycemia/Diabetes: 83.3% check this comorbidity; 88.1% use HgbA1C as single best screening test; (E) MRSA nasal colonization: 63.7% do not test; 28.9% test all patients; 7.4% test selectively. Intraoperative: (A) Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients: 43.4% use single antibiotic for 24 h; 21.3% use double antibiotic for 24 h; 14.2% use single/double antibiotic for 7 days postoperatively; (B) Skin-cleansing: 68.7% at home (45.6% chlorhexidine sponge; 11.9% clippers); (C) Intraoperative skin disinfection: 46.9% single chlorhexidine; 25% double chlorhexidine-povidone-iodine;15.4% single povidone-iodine; (D) Tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce bleeding/SSI: 96% yes (51% double IV dose, 35.2% single IV dose, 23.6% intra-articular injection); (E) Surgical suction drain: 52% do not use drains; 19.7% use a drain < 24 h; (F) Intra-articular lavage: 64.9% use only saline; 28.1% use dilute povidone-iodine; (G) Antibiotic local delivery to prevent PJI: 82.4% use antibiotic-added cement. Postoperative: (A) Routine monitoring of PJI serologic markers: 42% only in symptomatic patients; 34.2% do not; 20.8% in all patients; (B) Serologic markers to rule in/out PJI: 95.9% CRP; 71% SEDRATE; 60.6% WBC; (C) Synovial fluid test to rule in/out PJI: 79.6% culture/sensitivity; 69.5% WBC count; 31.4% CRP. CONCLUSIONS This survey demonstrated that notable differences still exist in the application of PJI preventive measures across different geographic areas: Optimizing the patient preoperatively and applying multimodal intraoperative strategies represent newer, clinically relevant steps in the effort to reduce the burden of PJI. More uniform guidelines still need to be produced from international scientific societies in order facilitate a more comprehensive approach to this devastating complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
|
28
|
Buijs MAS, van den Kieboom J, Sliepen J, Wever KLH, van Breugel JM, Hietbrink F, IJpma FFA, Govaert GAM. Outcome and risk factors for recurrence of early onset fracture-related infections treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention: Results of a large retrospective multicentre cohort study. Injury 2022; 53:3930-3937. [PMID: 36307267 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early Fracture-Related Infections (FRIs) are a common entity in hospitals treating trauma patients and are often treated with a Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure. Aims of this study were to 1) evaluate the recurrence rate after DAIR procedures for early onset FRI, 2) establish the number of surgical procedures to gain control of the initial infection and 3) identify independent predictors for recurrence in this cohort. METHODS A retrospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in two level 1 trauma centres. Consecutive patients who underwent a DAIR procedure between January 1st 2015 and July 1st 2020 for confirmed FRI with an onset of <6 weeks after the latest osseous operation were included. Recorded data included patient demographics, treatment characteristics and follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors for recurrent FRI. RESULTS A total of 141 patients with early FRI were included in this study with a median age of 54.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 34.5-64.0). The recurrence rate of FRI was 13% (n = 19) at one year follow-up and 18% (n = 25) at 23.1 months (IQR 15.3-36.4) follow-up. Infection control was achieved in 94% (n = 127/135) of cases. In total, 73 patients (52%) underwent at least two surgical procedures to treat the ongoing initial episode of FRI, of whom 54 patients (74%) required two to three procedures and 17 patients (23%) four to five procedures. Predictors for recurrent FRI were use of an intramedullary nail during index operation (odds ratio (OR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-13.8)), need for additional surgical procedures to treat ongoing infection during the treatment period following the first presentation of early FRI (OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-3.5)) and a decreased Injury Severity Score (ISS) (inverted OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.1)). CONCLUSION The recurrence rate after treatment of early onset FRI in patients treated with a DAIR procedure was 18% at 23.1 months follow-up. At least two surgical procedures to gain control of the initial infection were needed in 52% of patients. Independent predictors for recurrent FRI were the use of an intramedullary nail during index operation, need for additional surgical procedures and a decreased ISS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A S Buijs
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J van den Kieboom
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Sliepen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - K L H Wever
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J M van Breugel
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Hietbrink
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F F A IJpma
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G A M Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Soundarrajan D, Rajkumar N, Dhanasekararaja P, Rithika S, Rajasekaran S. A Comparison of Outcomes of Culture positive and Culture negative Acute Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection following Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention ( DAIR). Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022:10.1007/s00590-022-03445-2. [PMID: 36436089 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03445-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to compare the outcome of culture-positive (CP PJI) and culture-negative (CN PJI) acute knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) with polyethylene insert exchange. We also aim to analyze the factors associated with the successful outcome of DAIR and the influence of failed DAIR on the outcome of subsequent two-stage revision arthroplasty. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 36 consecutive patients who underwent DAIR for acute PJI between January 2013 and January 2018. The patient's demographic data, McPherson grade, surgical details, laboratory and microbiology data were retrieved from the medical records. All the patients have been followed up for a minimum of 3 years or until re-operation, revision or death and any complications, incidence of DAIR failure, revision and mortality were noted. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 2.4 years. Among the 36 patients, 16 had CP PJI and 20 had CN PJI. Among the 16 patients with CP PJI, 8 patients had success with DAIR and 8 patients had a recurrence of infection (50%) at a mean of 21 months (range, 2 weeks to 55 months). Among the 20 patients with CN PJI, 14 patients had success with DAIR and 6 patients had a recurrence of infection [30% (6/20)] at a mean of 69 months (range, 13-221 months) (p < .05). The Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showed survivorship did not vary significantly between both groups (p > .05). Univariate regression analysis showed symptom duration of more than one month found to be significantly associated with the DAIR failure. There was no difference in failure rate after DAIR between age, Charlson comorbidity index, early postoperative versus acute hematogenous group and type of organism grown. Ten out of 14 DAIR failures were successfully managed with two-stage revision surgery with no recurrence of infection till the final follow-up. In the remaining 4 patients, one underwent re-debridement, two underwent arthrodesis and one was left with an antibiotic cement spacer. CONCLUSION DAIR with polyethylene exchange will give comparable results irrespective of the culture positivity. Symptom duration of more than 30 days for DAIR is significantly associated with DAIR failure. DAIR failures can be successfully managed with two-stage revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Natesan Rajkumar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, 641 043, India
| | | | - Singh Rithika
- Department of Orthopaedics, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, 641 043, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Poilvache H, Van Bambeke F, Cornu O. Development of an innovative in vivo model of PJI treated with DAIR. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:984814. [PMID: 36314026 PMCID: PMC9606572 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.984814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) are catastrophic complications of joint replacement. Debridement, implant retention, and antibiotic therapy (DAIR) is the usual strategy in acute infections but fails in 45% of MRSA infections. We describe the development of a model of infected arthroplasty in rabbits, treated with debridement and a course of vancomycin with clinically relevant dosage. Materials and methods A total of 15 rabbits were assigned to three groups: vancomycin pharmacokinetics (A), infection (B), and DAIR (C). All groups received a tibial arthroplasty using a Ti-6Al-4V implant. Groups B and C were infected per-operatively with a 5.5 log10 MRSA inoculum. After 1 week, groups C infected knees were surgically debrided. Groups A and C received 1 week of vancomycin. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in group A following 1st and 5th injections. Animals were euthanized 2 weeks after the arthroplasty. Implants and tissue samples were processed for bacterial counts and histology. Results Average vancomycin AUC0–12 h were 213.0 mg*h/L (1st injection) and 207.8 mg*h/L (5th injection), reaching clinical targets. All inoculated animals were infected. CFUs were reproducible in groups B. A sharp decrease in CFU was observed in groups C. Serum markers and leukocytes counts increased significantly in infected groups. Conclusion We developed a reproducible rabbit model of PJI treated with DAIR, using vancomycin at clinically relevant concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hervé Poilvache
- Neuro Musculo-Skeletal Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium,Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology Laboratory, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium,Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium,*Correspondence: Hervé Poilvache,
| | - Françoise Van Bambeke
- Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology Laboratory, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Cornu
- Neuro Musculo-Skeletal Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium,Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huffaker SJ, Prentice HA, Kelly MP, Hinman AD. Is There Harm in Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Versus Two-Stage Revision in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection? Experiences Within a Large US Health Care System. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:2082-2089.e1. [PMID: 35533824 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When faced with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty, the treating surgeon must determine whether 2-stage revision or "liner exchange," aka debridement, antibiotics, exchange of the modular polyethylene liner, and retention of fixed implants (DAIR), offers the best balance of infection eradication versus treatment morbidity. We sought to determine septic re-revision risk following DAIR compared to initial 2-stage revision. METHODS We conducted a cohort study using data from Kaiser Permanente's total joint replacement registry. Primary total knee arthroplasty patients who went on to have a PJI treated by DAIR or 2-stage revision were included (2005-2018). Propensity score-weighted Cox regression was used to evaluate risk for septic re-revision. RESULTS In total, 1,410 PJIs were included, 1,000 (70.9%) treated with DAIR. Applying propensity score weights, patients undergoing DAIR had a higher risk for septic re-revision compared to initial 2-stage procedures (hazard ratio 3.09, 95% CI 2.22-4.42). Of DAIR procedures, 150 failed (15%) and went on to subsequent 2-stage revision (DAIR-F). When compared to patients undergoing an initial 2-stage revision, we failed to observe a difference in septic re-revision risk following DAIR-F (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.58-2.12). CONCLUSION Although DAIR had a higher risk of septic re-revision, we failed to observe a difference in risk following DAIR-F when compared to those who initially underwent 2-stage revision. Functional outcome, patient, and organism factors are important to consider when discussing PJI management options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
32
|
Sancho I, Otermin-Maya I, Gutiérrez-Dubois J, Aláez I, Hidalgo-Ovejero Á, Librero J, Portillo ME. Accuracy of a Novel Preoperative Failure Risk Model for Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention ( DAIR) in Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12. [PMID: 36140498 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Given the variable success of the debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in patients with acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI), an accurate selection of candidates is critical. In this study, we set about calculating the predictive value of a novel algorithm for predicting outcome following DAIR developed by Shohat et al. Sixty-four patients who underwent debridement for (early and late) acute PJI in a tertiary-level university hospital were selected, and the aforementioned algorithm was retrospectively applied. Patients with model scores of 40−50%, 50−60%, 60−70%, 70−80% and 80−90% displayed success rates of 33.34%, 41.18%, 57.9%, 78.27% and 100%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.69. The calibration intercept value was 0, and the calibration slope value was 1. Failure rates were significantly higher for the following variables: revision surgery (p = 0.012) index surgery for reasons other than osteoarthritis (p = 0.01), and C-reactive protein level >30 mg/L (p = 0.042). This analysis demonstrated that the Shohat algorithm is associated with an optimal calibration value and a moderate predictive value for failure of a DAIR procedure in patients with acute PJI. Its validation is recommended before it can be routinely applied in daily practice.
Collapse
|
33
|
D'Errico M, Morelli I, Castellini G, Gianola S, Logoluso N, Romanò D, Scarponi S, Pellegrini A. Is debridement really the best we can do for periprosthetic joint infections following total ankle replacements? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 28:697-708. [PMID: 34688527 DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ankle periprosthetic joint infections are rising in number, but an evidence-based gold standard treatment has not been defined yet. METHODS We made a systematic review about the operative treatment of infections following total ankle arthroplasty. Proportional meta-analysis was used to summarize effects of the surgical techniques included. Primary outcome of this study was infection eradication, followed by complications, re-interventions, amputation rates and functions. RESULTS We included six studies(113 patients) reporting 6 types of surgical interventions, mostly irrigation and debridement (35.4%) and two-stage revisions (24.8%). No differences among all analyzed techniques were found in the infection eradication outcome as well as in the secondary outcomes. Patients receiving a permanent spacer are most likely to end up with amputation. CONCLUSIONS Literature dealing with infections after total ankle replacement is currently composed by few low-quality articles. The overlapping of confidence intervals related to all analyzed interventions showed no superiority of either technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario D'Errico
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Ortopedia Ricostruttiva Articolare della Clinica Ortopedica - ORACO Unit), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- ASST Ovest Milanese, Ospedale di Legnano, UOC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, 20025 Legnano, MI, Italy.
| | - Greta Castellini
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Unit of Clinical Epidemiology), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| | - Silvia Gianola
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Unit of Clinical Epidemiology), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| | - Nicola Logoluso
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e delle Infezioni Osteoarticolari - CRIO Unit), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| | - Delia Romanò
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e delle Infezioni Osteoarticolari - CRIO Unit), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| | - Sara Scarponi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e delle Infezioni Osteoarticolari - CRIO Unit), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| | - Antonio Pellegrini
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e delle Infezioni Osteoarticolari - CRIO Unit), via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
McNally M, Corrigan R, Sliepen J, Dudareva M, Rentenaar R, IJpma F, Atkins BL, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Govaert G. What Factors Affect Outcome in the Treatment of Fracture-Related Infection? Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11070946. [PMID: 35884200 PMCID: PMC9312092 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11070946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This international, multi-center study investigated the effect of individual components of surgery on the clinical outcomes of patients treated for fracture-related infection (FRI). All patients with surgically treated FRIs, confirmed by the FRI consensus definition, were included. Data were collected on demographics, time from injury to FRI surgery, soft tissue reconstruction, stabilization and systemic and local anti-microbial therapy. Patients were followed up for a minimum of one year. In total, 433 patients were treated with a mean age of 49.7 years (17−84). The mean follow-up time was 26 months (range 12−72). The eradication of infection was successful in 86.4% of all cases and 86.0% of unhealed infected fractures were healed at the final review. In total, 3.3% required amputation. The outcome was not dependent on age, BMI, the presence of metalwork or time from injury (recurrence rate 16.5% in FRI treated at 1−10 weeks after injury; 13.1% at 11−52 weeks; 12.1% at >52 weeks: p = 0.52). The debridement and retention of a stable implant (DAIR) had a failure rate of 21.4%; implant exchange to a new internal fixation had a failure rate of 12.5%; and conversion to external fixation had a failure rate of 10.3% (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) DAIR vs. Ext Fix 2.377; 95% C.I. 0.96−5.731). Tibial FRI treated with a free flap was successful in 92.1% of cases and in 80.4% of cases without a free flap (HR 0.38; 95% C.I. 0.14−1.0), while the use of NPWT was associated with higher recurrence rates (HR 3.473; 95% C.I. 1.852−6.512). The implantation of local antibiotics reduced the recurrence from 18.7% to 10.0% (HR 0.48; 95% C.I. 0.29−0.81). The successful treatment of FRI was multi-factorial. These data suggested that treatment decisions should not be based on time from injury alone, as other factors also affected the outcome. Further work to determine the best indications for DAIR, free flap reconstruction and local antibiotics is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin McNally
- Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; (R.C.); (M.D.); (B.L.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ruth Corrigan
- Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; (R.C.); (M.D.); (B.L.A.)
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Oxford University, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Jonathan Sliepen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.S.); (F.I.)
| | - Maria Dudareva
- Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; (R.C.); (M.D.); (B.L.A.)
| | - Rob Rentenaar
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Frank IJpma
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.S.); (F.I.)
| | - Bridget L. Atkins
- Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; (R.C.); (M.D.); (B.L.A.)
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Geertje Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mercurio M, Galasso O, Familiari F, Iannò B, Bruno CF, Castioni D, Gasparini G. Trend of Perioperative CRP (C-Reactive Protein) Levels in Non-Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2022; 14:36589. [PMID: 35782199 DOI: 10.52965/001c.36589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this prospective study was to define the perioperative trend of C-reactive protein (CRP) in non-infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). CRP was evaluated in 42 patients the day before surgery and 4 and 30 days after surgery. Functional and radiological evaluation was scheduled for 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Preoperatively, the median CRP was 3.2 mg/L (IQR,3.2-4.2) (reference range, 0-5 mg/L); 4 and 30 days after surgery, it measured 57.6 mg/L (IQR,36.1-96.4) and 5.3 mg/L (IQR,3.0-11.8), respectively. There were significant differences between the CRP preoperatively and 4 days after surgery (p<0.001) and between CPR levels 4 and 30 days after surgery (p<0.001) but not between CRP values preoperatively and 30 days after surgery (p=0.181). Higher preoperative CRP was associated to heart disease and chronic renal failure (r=0.329, p=0.036, and r=0.437, p=0.004, respectively). Four days after surgery, higher CRP was associated to older patients (r=0.311, p=0.048). In summary, 30 days after primary non-infected TKA, CRP levels were comparable to preoperative values. Older age and comorbidities should be carefully evaluated using postoperative CRP as diagnostic marker for the early detection of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Mercurio
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Olimpio Galasso
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Filippo Familiari
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Bruno Iannò
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy; Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, "G. Jazzolino" Hospital, Piazza Fleming, 89900, Vibo Valentia, Italy
| | - Carmine Fabio Bruno
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy; Hip Diseases and Joint Replacement Surgery Unit; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Castioni
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gasparini
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, "Magna Græcia" University, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, V.le Europa, (loc. Germaneto), 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Perez BA, Koressel JE, Lopez VS, Barchick S, Pirruccio K, Lee GC. Does a 2-Stage Debridement Result in Higher Rates of Implant Retention Compared With Single Debridement Alone? J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:S669-S673. [PMID: 35189287 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 89 patients with acute prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or 2-DAIR. Patients had <3 weeks of symptoms and met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for infection. Sixty-three patients were treated with DAIR, whereas 26 patients were managed using a 2-DAIR protocol where patients underwent initial debridement, antibiotic bead placement, and subsequent return to the operating room at an average of 16.3 days for repeat debridement and modular component exchange. Patients received a 6-week course of intravenous antibiotics and 3 months of oral antibiotics for suppression. Demographics, comorbidities, implant retention rates, and complications were compared between the groups. The McPherson host type and infection type classification system were used to categorize patients in both the DAIR and 2-DAIR groups. Regression analysis was performed to control postoperative vs acute hematogenous infection, procedure, and comorbidities. The McPherson host types and infection types were not different between DAIR and 2-DAIR patients, P = .728 and P = .061, respectively. RESULTS There was no difference in the overall implant retention rate between DAIR and 2-DAIR (63.49% vs 69.23%, P = .605). The average days to reinfection was significantly longer for the 2-DAIR cohort compared with DAIR (271.3 vs 165.3, P = .024) in patients who failed treatment. However, when controlling for infection, microorganism, index procedure, and comorbidities, there was no difference in days to reinfection (P = .679). There were no differences in complications, 90-day readmission, or revision rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS A staged debridement for acute prosthetic joint infection did not improve the rates of infection control. Randomized trials are needed to define indications and potential benefits of 2-DAIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Perez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph E Koressel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Viviana Serra Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen Barchick
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin Pirruccio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Gwo-Chin Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Asokan A, Ibrahim MS, Thompson JW, Haddad FS. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in non-oncological femoral megaprosthesis infections: minimum 5 year follow-up. J Exp Orthop 2022; 9:32. [PMID: 35403987 PMCID: PMC9001793 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00469-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Megaprostheses are increasingly utilised outside of the oncological setting, and remain at significant risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) is an established treatment for PJI, however its use in non-oncological patients with femoral megaprostheses has not been widely reported. There are significant differences in patient physiology, treatment goals, and associated risks between these patient cohorts. Methods We identified 14 patients who underwent DAIR for a PJI of their femoral megaprostheses, between 2000 and 2014, whom had their index procedure secondary to non-oncological indications. Patients were managed as part of a multidisciplinary team, with our standardised surgical technique including exchange of all mobile parts, and subsequent antibiotic therapy for a minimum of 3 months. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years. Results Patients included six proximal femoral replacements, five distal femoral replacements, and three total femoral replacements. No patients were lost to follow-up. There were six males and eight females, with a mean age of 67.2 years, and mean ASA of 2.3. Nine patients (64.3%) successfully cleared their infection following DAIR at a minimum of 5 year follow-up. Five patients (35.7%) required further revision surgery, with four patients cleared of infection. No patients who underwent DAIR alone suffered complications as a result of the procedure. Conclusions The use of DAIR in these complex patients can lead to successful outcomes, but the risk of further revision remains high. The success rate (64.3%) remains on par with other studies evaluating DAIR in megaprostheses and in primary arthroplasty. This study indicates judicious use of DAIR can be an appropriate part of the treatment algorithm. Level of evidence II
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Asokan
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
| | - M S Ibrahim
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - J W Thompson
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - F S Haddad
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fokkema AT, Kampschreur LM, Pirii LE, Zijlstra WP. Rat bite fever in a total knee arthroplasty: an unusual case of periprosthetic joint infection. Arthroplasty 2022; 4:13. [PMID: 35365242 PMCID: PMC8976379 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00114-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of orthopedic arthroplasty surgery. Rat bite fever is a rare infection with Streptobacillus moniliformis (S. moniliformis). Rat bite fever can lead to serious complications such as pyogenic infection of joints, bacteremia, endocarditis and even death. We hereby present the first case of a patient with a total knee arthroplasty, infected with S. moniliformis, successfully treated by surgical debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Case presentation The patient was a 64-year-old female. S. moniliformis was isolated from blood cultures and an aspirate of the left knee by 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction technique. It was assumed that the S. moniliformis had a systemic origin and secondarily infected the knee due to fever nine days before the onset of symptoms of the knee. The patient was successfully managed with DAIR and intravenous administration of ceftriaxone for six weeks and oral doxycycline for another six weeks. Conclusions S. moniliformis is a rare pathogen and is difficult to culture. The 16S rRNA sequencing is helpful in the determination of a causative microorganism in the case of a culture-negative PJI. A DAIR procedure in combination with 12 weeks of antibiotics could successfully treat S. moniliformis prosthetic joint infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Theunis Fokkema
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands, 8934 AD.
| | | | | | - Wierd Pieter Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands, 8934 AD
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Veerman K, Raessens J, Telgt D, Smulders K, Goosen JHM. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention after revision arthroplasty : antibiotic mismatch, timing, and repeated DAIR associated with poor outcome. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:464-471. [PMID: 35360944 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b4.bjj-2021-1264.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a widely accepted form of surgical treatment for patients with an early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary arthroplasty. The outcome of DAIR after revision arthroplasty, however, has not been reported. The aim of this study was to report the success rate of DAIR after revision arthroplasty with a follow-up of two years. METHODS This retrospective study, conducted at the Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, included 88 patients who underwent DAIR within 90 days of revision total hip or total knee arthroplasty between 2012 and 2019. Details of the surgical procedures and PJI were collected. Univariate analysis and a subgroup analysis of the culture-positive group were performed. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were constructed. RESULTS The overall success rate of DAIR, with respect to the retention of components and the cure of infection, was 68% after two years. DAIR performed with an interval of > 30 days after the index revision procedure (odds ratio (OR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.72); p = 0.008), a repeated DAIR within 90 days (OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.97); p = 0.040), and the use of an immunosuppressive agent (OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.67); p = 0.012) were associated with a significantly reduced success rate. In the culture-positive group, a mismatch between the antibiotic treatment and the susceptibility of the organism was associated with a significantly lower success rate (OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.62); p = 0.007). CONCLUSION DAIR is an acceptable form of surgical treatment for patients with a suspected early PJI after revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. DAIRs performed after a prolonged interval, multiple DAIRs, and antibiotic mismatches were significantly associated with an increased risk of failure. Optimization of the host immune response and the prevention of antibiotic mismatch are modifiable factors that may improve the outcome. The high rate of mismatches was an important finding, underlining the need for a review of the local microbiological data, which might improve the outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):464-471.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Veerman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joris Raessens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Denise Telgt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Katrijn Smulders
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jon H M Goosen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
AIMS Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. METHODS Patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty between March 2007 and August 2018 were reviewed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for risk factors for SSI, and to identify factors predicting a successful DAIR at one year. RESULTS A total of 3,966 patients were identified. The overall rate of SSI was 1.7% (51 patients (1.3%) with deep SSI, and 18 (0.45%) with superficial SSI). In all, 50 patients underwent revision surgery for infection (43 with DAIR, and seven with excision arthroplasty). After adjustment for other variables, only concurrent urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 4.92; p < 0.001) and increasing delay to theatre for treatment of the fracture (OR 1.31 per day, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001) were predictors of developing a SSI, while a cemented arthroplasty was protective (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.031). In all, nine patients (20.9%) were alive at one year with a functioning hemiarthroplasty following DAIR, 20 (46.5%) required multiple surgical debridements after an initial DAIR, and 18 were converted to an excision arthroplasty due to persistent infection, with six were alive at one year. The culture of any gram-negative organism reduced success rates to 12.5% (no cases were successful with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas infection). Favourable organisms included Citrobacter and Proteus (100% cure rate). The all-cause mortality at one year after deep SSI was 55.87% versus 24.9% without deep infection. CONCLUSION Deep infection remains a devastating complication regardless of the treatment strategy employed. Success rates of DAIR are poor compared to total hip arthroplasty, and should be reserved for favourable organisms in patients able to tolerate multiple surgical procedures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):958-965.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adeel Ikram
- The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gerritsen M, Khawar A, Scheper H, van der Wal R, Schoones J, de Boer M, Nelissen R, Pijls B. Modular component exchange and outcome of DAIR for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection : a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:806-812. [PMID: 34592839 PMCID: PMC8558449 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.bjo-2021-0090.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the association between exchange of modular parts in debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure and outcomes for hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until May 2021. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression was used to estimate, on a study level, the success rate of DAIR related to component exchange. Risk of bias was appraised using the (AQUILA) checklist. Results We included 65 studies comprising 6,630 patients. The pooled overall success after DAIR for PJI was 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63% to 70%). This was 70% (95% CI 65% to 75%) for DAIR for hip PJI and 63% (95% CI 58% to 69%) for knee PJI. In studies before 2004 (n = 27), our meta-regression analysis showed a 3.5% increase in success rates for each 10% increase in component exchange in DAIR for hip PJI and a 3.1% increase for each 10% increase in component exchange for knee PJI. When restricted to studies after 2004 (n = 37), this association changed: for DAIR for hip PJI a decrease in successful outcome by 0.5% for each 10% increase in component exchange and for DAIR for knee PJI this was a 0.01% increase in successful outcome for each 10% increase in component exchange. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-regression found no benefit of modular component exchange on reduction of PJI failure. This limited effect should be weighed against the risks for the patient and cost on a case-by-case basis. The association between exchange of modular components and outcome changed before and after 2004. This suggests the effect seen after 2004 may reflect a more rigorous, evidence-based, approach to the infected implant compared to the years before. Level of Evidence: Level III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):806–812.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Gerritsen
- Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Dept of Infectious Disease, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Abdullah Khawar
- Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk Scheper
- Dept of Infectious Disease, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Robert van der Wal
- Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy (formerly: Walaeus Library), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark de Boer
- Dept of Infectious Disease, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rob Nelissen
- Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Pijls
- Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Toh RX, Yeo ZN, Liow MHL, Yeo SJ, Lo NN, Chen JY. Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: What Predicts Success or Failure? J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:3562-9. [PMID: 34116912 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the treatment of choice for acute postoperative and acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is limited literature on predictive prognostic factors for DAIR. We aim to report the outcomes of DAIR and investigate the predictive prognostic factors. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 106 DAIRs. Failure was defined as requiring removal of TKA implants. Predictive factors that may influence success of DAIR treatment such as age, gender, body mass index, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities, preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein, symptom duration, time between total knee arthroplasty and DAIR, cultures, rifampicin use, polyethylene liner change, and antibiotic duration were analyzed. RESULTS The success rate of DAIR was 69.8% (74/106 patients). For successes, mean time from DAIR-to-mortality was longer than failures (61.6 ± 42.7 vs 9.75 ± 9.60 months, P = .0150). Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus PJI (odds ratio [OR] 3.64, confidence interval [CI] 1.30-10.2, P = .0140) was a significant predictor for failure of DAIR. Higher preoperative ESR correlated to failure (OR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.04, P = .008). In successes, mean ESR was 75.4 (66.1-84.6), whereas mean ESR in failures was 116 (88.3-143) (P = .011). An ESR > 107.5 predicted failure with a sensitivity of 51.5 and specificity of 85.2. ESR > 107.5 correlated to failure (OR 6.60, CI 2.29-19.0, P < .001). Repeat DAIRs were strongly correlated to failure (OR 5.27, CI 1.99-13.9, P < .01). CONCLUSION DAIR failure is associated with earlier time to mortality. Repeat DAIRs, elevated ESR > 107.5, and S aureus PJI are associated with treatment failure and 2-stage revision is recommended.
Collapse
|
43
|
Beckmann NA, Hanslmeier MG, Omlor GW, Feisst M, Maier MW, Lehner B. Is Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation Suitable for the Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection? J Clin Med 2021; 10:3246. [PMID: 34362030 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be devastating for the patient and demanding for the surgeon. In acute PJI, attempts are made to retain the prosthesis by debridement of the infected tissue, targeted antibiotic therapy and an exchange of modular components with implant retention (DAIR). There has been sparse research with adjunctive negative pressure wound treatment with wound irrigation (NPWTI) on the treatment outcome. Questions/purposes: The goal was to assess the efficacy of our protocol of DAIR with adjunctive NPWTI in acute PJI and to reduce the need for later additional DAIR and Irrigation and Debridement (I and D). Patients and Methods: Our cohort of 30 patients (31 hips) with acute PJI was divided into two groups based on symptom presentation up to 6 weeks or >6 weeks from prior (index) surgery (acute early or acute late groups, respectively). All received DAIR with an exchange of modular components and NPWTI with polyhexanide instillation, with the goal of bacterial elimination and biofilm elimination. Postoperatively, the patients were followed up clinically and radiographically for a mean of 4.3 years. Results: Of the 31 PJI hips, 19 were early acute and 12 were late acute. In total, 21 hips had no evidence of residual infection, 10 required further surgical revision: 1 due to dislocation and 9 due to infection. Of these nine, seven had a removal of all the components and two were treated with irrigation and debridement (I and D), with the demise of one patient from pneumonia shortly after the procedure. The Kaplan–Meier 60-month revision free implant survival from infection was 73.2% (CI: 58.9–91.0%) and at the final follow up, the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 81.1 ± 11.8 and the mean WOMAC score was 33.3 ± 20.1. Conclusions: Our results are in line with those reported in prior studies. However, the utility of our protocol is inconclusive and needs further evaluation based on our small cohort and the lack of a control group. Level of Evidence: IV.
Collapse
|
44
|
Chalmers BP, Kapadia M, Chiu YF, Miller AO, Henry MW, Lyman S, Carli AV. Accuracy of Predictive Algorithms in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention ( DAIR). J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:2558-2566. [PMID: 33750631 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) failure remains high for total hip and knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to determine the predictive value of the CRIME80 and KLIC for failure of DAIR in acute hematogenous (AH) and acute postoperative (AP) PJIs, respectively. METHODS We identified 134 patients who underwent DAIR for AH PJI with <4 weeks of symptoms after index arthroplasty and 122 patients who underwent DAIR for AP PJI <90 days from index. In the AH group, 15 patients (11%) failed at 90 days and overall, 33 (25%) had failed by 2 years. In the AP group, 39 (32%) failed at 90 days and overall, 52 (43%) failed by 2 years. Logistic regression models were used to determine the area under the curve (AUC) to establish thresholds using the Youden index. RESULTS For the AP cohort, AUCs were below 0.66 for KLIC, Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and McPherson host grade. For the AH cohort, 90-day AUCs were 0.70 for CRIME80 and below 0.66 for Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and McPherson host grade. In multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, the CRIME80 AUC improved to 0.77 at 90 days. CONCLUSION To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the first external validation of the KLIC and CRIME80 for predicting DAIR failure in a North American population. The results indicate that alternative methods for predicting DAIR failure at 90 days and 2 years for acute PJI are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian P Chalmers
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Milan Kapadia
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Yu-Fen Chiu
- Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Andy O Miller
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Michael W Henry
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Stephen Lyman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY; Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Alberto V Carli
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Scheper H, Gerritsen LM, Pijls BG, Van Asten SA, Visser LG, De Boer MGJ. Outcome of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Staphylococcal Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections, Focused on Rifampicin Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab298. [PMID: 34258321 PMCID: PMC8271145 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) with debridement, antibiotics, and retention of the implant (DAIR) often results in failure. An important evidence gap concerns the treatment with rifampicin for PJI. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the outcome of staphylococcal hip and/or knee PJI after DAIR, focused on the role of rifampicin. Studies published until September 2, 2020 were included. Success rates were stratified for type of joint and type of micro-organism. Sixty-four studies were included. The pooled risk ratio for rifampicin effectiveness was 1.10 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.22). The pooled success rate was 69% for Staphylococcus aureus hip PJI, 54% for S aureus knee PJI, 83% for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) hip PJI, and 73% for CNS knee PJI. Success rates for MRSA PJI (58%) were similar to MSSA PJI (60%). The meta-analysis indicates that rifampicin may only prevent a small fraction of all treatment failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Scheper
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L M Gerritsen
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B G Pijls
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S A Van Asten
- Department of Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L G Visser
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M G J De Boer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chaiyakit P, Meknavin S, Hongku N, Onklin I. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion in patients with acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection of the knee. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:557. [PMID: 34144684 PMCID: PMC8214261 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04451-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, DAIR is associated with a high percentage of unsuccessful outcomes. Since 2007, direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion, which can provide a high concentration of intra-articular antibiotic, has been used in combination with DAIR to improve treatment outcomes among patients in our institution. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of DAIR combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion in patients who presented with acute hematogenous PJI after TKA. Methods We reviewed the data of all patients diagnosed with acute hematogenous PJI after primary TKA (from 2008 to 2015) who received DAIR combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion. Results In total, 15 knees in 12 patients were semi-urgently treated with this method. The mean follow-up time was 93.3 (minimum: 56) months, and the longest follow-up time was 11 years. Two patients (n = 3 knees) had a well-functioning, non-infected prosthesis 6 and 10 years after the procedure. Two patients (n = 2 knees) had re-infection 2 and 5 years after surgery, and they required two-stage revision. None of the patients were lost to follow-up. Finally, 13 (86.6%) of 15 infected knees were successfully treated with this method. Conclusions DAIR combined with direct intra-articular antibiotic infusion is an effective treatment for acute hematogenous PJI after TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pruk Chaiyakit
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Surapoj Meknavin
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Natthapong Hongku
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ittiwat Onklin
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Vuorinen M, Mäkinen T, Rantasalo M, Huotari K. Effect of a multidisciplinary team on the treatment of hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: a single-centre study of 154 infections. Infect Dis (Lond) 2021; 53:700-706. [PMID: 34060985 DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1925341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multidisciplinary team responsible for the management plan of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) was founded in January 2008. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a decrease in the number of surgeries and length of stay (LOS) was seen in the management of PJI with the aid of the multidisciplinary team. METHODS This retrospective cohort study consisted of a total of 154 postoperative PJIs from three time periods: 21 PJIs from 2005 to 2007 (Group 1), 65 PJIs from 2011 to 2013 (Group 2), and 68 PJIs from 2015 to 2016 (Group 3). Successful outcome was classified as the retention of the original implant or revised implant and no infection-related death. RESULTS The median number of operations decreased from 2.0 operations (Group 1) to 1.0 operation (Group 3) (p = .023), and the median LOS was shortened from 49.0 days (Group 1) to 17.0 days (Group 3) (p = .000). The number of PJIs treated with two-stage exchange decreased from 52.4% (11/21, Group 1) to 16.2% (11/68, Group 3) (p = .004). Simultaneously, debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) as primary surgical treatment increased from 42.9% (9/21, Group 1) to 89.7% (61/68, Group 3) (p = .000). The successful outcome of DAIR improved from 55.6% (5/9, Group 1) to 85.2% (52/61, Group 3) (p = .077). CONCLUSIONS Treatment of PJI in a specialized centre with the aid of a multidisciplinary team lead to fewer surgeries and reduced LOS. Successful outcome of DAIR improved over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markku Vuorinen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tatu Mäkinen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mikko Rantasalo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kaisa Huotari
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Doub JB, Ng VY, Johnson A, Amoroso A, Kottilil S, Wilson E. Potential Use of Adjuvant Bacteriophage Therapy With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Surgery to Treat Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infections. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab277. [PMID: 34159220 PMCID: PMC8214010 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of arthroplasties conducted annually continues to increase; however, approximately 1%–2% of all knee and hip arthroplasties will become infected. These prosthetic joint infections are costly, difficult to treat, and cause significant morbidity and mortality as a direct result of conventional surgical and medical managements. In this perspective, we discuss factors that make these infections arduous to treat as well as the potential use of adjuvant bacteriophage therapy with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention surgery to cure these infections without removing the infected prosthesis. We also provide rationale as to why future clinical trials evaluating this novel therapeutic will need to be designed as noninferiority trials, and we compare this approach to 2-stage revision surgery. If bacteriophage therapy continues to show effectiveness, this could revolutionize the treatment of prosthetic joint infections and pioneer new treatments for similar infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Doub
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vincent Y Ng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Aaron Johnson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anthony Amoroso
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shyamasundaran Kottilil
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Eleanor Wilson
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Löwik CAM, Parvizi J, Jutte PC, Zijlstra WP, Knobben BAS, Xu C, Goswami K, Belden KA, Sousa R, Carvalho A, Martínez-Pastor JC, Soriano A, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Is a Viable Treatment Option for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Presenting More Than 4 Weeks After Index Arthroplasty. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:630-636. [PMID: 31504331 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) largely depends on the presence of a mature biofilm. At what time point DAIR should be disrecommended is unknown. This multicenter study evaluated the outcome of DAIR in relation to the time after index arthroplasty. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated PJIs occurring within 90 days after surgery and treated with DAIR. Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up <1 year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as (1) any further surgical procedure related to infection; (2) PJI-related death; or (3) use of long-term suppressive antibiotics. RESULTS We included 769 patients. Treatment failure occurred in 294 patients (38%) and was similar between time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR: the failure rate for Week 1-2 was 42% (95/226), the rate for Week 3-4 was 38% (143/378), the rate for Week 5-6 was 29% (29/100), and the rate for Week 7-12 was 42% (27/65). An exchange of modular components was performed to a lesser extent in the early post-surgical course compared with the late course (41% vs 63%, respectively; P < .001). The causative microorganisms, comorbidities, and durations of symptoms were comparable between time intervals. CONCLUSIONS DAIR is a viable option in patients with early PJI presenting more than 4 weeks after index surgery, as long as DAIR is performed within at least 1 week after the onset of symptoms and modular components can be exchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A M Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wierd P Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas A S Knobben
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chi Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karan Goswami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine A Belden
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sydney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ricardo Sousa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - André Carvalho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Soriano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mulpur P, Sankineani SR, Thayi C, Reddy AVG. Does Early Debridement, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention ( DAIR) have a Role in Managing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee in Indian Scenario: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes. Indian J Orthop 2021; 55:961-6. [PMID: 34194654 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report outcomes of Debridement, Antibiotic therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic knee joint infections (PJI) in the Indian population and to study factors influencing outcomes. METHODS This was a Retrospective study of 80 cases of acute PJI after total knee arthroplasty who were treated by DAIR, within 2 weeks of onset of infection. A standardised institutional management protocol was applied to all cases. Patients were followed up for a minimum 1 year. Outcomes of DAIR were classified as successful or unsuccessful based on resolution or persistence of infection, and subsequent requirement of revision surgery. Influence of factors, like comorbidities, culture status and microbiological characteristics of causative organism, on outcomes was assessed. RESULTS Overall 55 patients (68.75%) had successful eradication of infection after DAIR. 27 (33.7%) patients were culture negative and 53 (66.2%) patients grew organisms on culture. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes (p = 0.082) between culture-positive cases (69.8% success rate) and (66.7% success rate) in culture negative cases. Furthermore, no difference in outcomes was observed in culture-positive patients between those who grew Gram-positive organisms versus Gram-negative organisms (p = 0.398) Similarly, patient comorbidities did not significantly alter the outcomes after DAIR (p = 0.732). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that early DAIR within 2 weeks of onset of infection using a standard protocol during surgery and postoperatively can result in good outcomes. Patient comorbidities, culture status (positive versus negative), Gram staining characteristics of organisms and the identity of pathogenic bacteria did not influence outcomes of DAIR for acute PJI.
Collapse
|