1
|
Löwik CAM, Parvizi J, Jutte PC, Zijlstra WP, Knobben BAS, Xu C, Goswami K, Belden KA, Sousa R, Carvalho A, Martínez-Pastor JC, Soriano A, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Is a Viable Treatment Option for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Presenting More Than 4 Weeks After Index Arthroplasty. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:630-636. [PMID: 31504331 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) largely depends on the presence of a mature biofilm. At what time point DAIR should be disrecommended is unknown. This multicenter study evaluated the outcome of DAIR in relation to the time after index arthroplasty. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated PJIs occurring within 90 days after surgery and treated with DAIR. Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up <1 year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as (1) any further surgical procedure related to infection; (2) PJI-related death; or (3) use of long-term suppressive antibiotics. RESULTS We included 769 patients. Treatment failure occurred in 294 patients (38%) and was similar between time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR: the failure rate for Week 1-2 was 42% (95/226), the rate for Week 3-4 was 38% (143/378), the rate for Week 5-6 was 29% (29/100), and the rate for Week 7-12 was 42% (27/65). An exchange of modular components was performed to a lesser extent in the early post-surgical course compared with the late course (41% vs 63%, respectively; P < .001). The causative microorganisms, comorbidities, and durations of symptoms were comparable between time intervals. CONCLUSIONS DAIR is a viable option in patients with early PJI presenting more than 4 weeks after index surgery, as long as DAIR is performed within at least 1 week after the onset of symptoms and modular components can be exchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A M Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wierd P Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas A S Knobben
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chi Xu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karan Goswami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine A Belden
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sydney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ricardo Sousa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - André Carvalho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Soriano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Löwik CAM, Ploegmakers JJW, Knobben BAS, Dijkstra B, de Vries AJ, Mithoe G, Kampinga G, Zijlstra WP, Jutte PC. A Second Surgical Debridement for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Should Not Be Discarded. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:2204-2209. [PMID: 32192835 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), a second surgical debridement (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention [DAIR]) is generally not recommended after a failed first one. We identified the failure rate of a second DAIR and aimed to identify patients in whom an additional debridement might still be beneficial. METHODS Patients with acute PJI of the hip or knee and treated with DAIR between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. A second DAIR was routinely performed provided that the soft tissue was intact. Failure of a second DAIR was described as (1) the need for additional surgical intervention to achieve infection control, (2) the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy due to persistent clinical and/or biochemical signs of infection, or (3) PJI related death. RESULTS From the 455 cases treated with DAIR, 144 cases underwent a second debridement (34.6%). Thirty-seven cases failed (37/144, 25.7%). The implant needed to be removed in 23 cases (23/144, 16%). Positive cultures during the second DAIR (odds ratio 3.16, 95% confidence interval 1.29-7.74) and chronic renal insufficiency (odds ratio 13.6, 95% confidence interval 2.03-91.33) were independent predictors for failure in the multivariate analysis. No difference in failure was observed between persistent infection with the same microorganism and reinfection with a new microorganism (failure rate 31.6% vs 34.6%, P = .83). CONCLUSION A second DAIR had a low failure rate in our cohort of patients and the implant could be retained in the majority of them. Therefore, a second DAIR should not be discarded in acute PJIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Claudia A M Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joris J W Ploegmakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas A S Knobben
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Baukje Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid J de Vries
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Glen Mithoe
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Certe, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Greetje Kampinga
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wierd P Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Löwik CAM, Knobben BAS, Zijlstra WP, Ploegmakers JJW, Mithoe G, Al Moujahid A, Kampinga GA, Jutte PC. Use of gentamicin-impregnated beads or sponges in the treatment of early acute periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 73:3454-3459. [PMID: 30189006 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Early acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) have failure rates ranging from 10% to 60%. We determined the efficacy of applying local gentamicin-impregnated beads and/or sponges during debridement in early PJI. Methods Patients with early acute PJI, defined as less than 21 days of symptoms and treated with DAIR within 90 days after index surgery, were retrospectively evaluated. Early failure was defined as PJI-related death, the need for implant removal or a second DAIR or antibiotic suppressive therapy owing to persistent signs of infection, all within 60 days after initial debridement. Overall failure was defined as implant removal at any timepoint during follow-up. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to correct for confounding factors. Results A total of 386 patients were included. Local gentamicin was applied in 293 patients (75.9%) and was withheld in 93 patients (24.1%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of local gentamicin was independently associated with early failure (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.12-3.48). After propensity matching, early failure was 40.3% in the gentamicin group versus 26.0% in the control group (P = 0.06) and overall failure was 5.2% in the gentamicin group versus 2.6% in the control group (P = 0.40). These numbers remained when solely analysing the application of gentamicin-impregnated sponges. Conclusions Even after propensity score matching, failure rates remained higher if local gentamicin-impregnated beads and/or sponges were administered in early acute PJI. Based on these results, their use should be discouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Claudia A M Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas A S Knobben
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wierd P Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Joris J W Ploegmakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Glen Mithoe
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Certe Medical Diagnostics & Advice, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Aziz Al Moujahid
- Center for Infectious Diseases Friesland, Izore, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Greetje A Kampinga
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zuidhof RJWJ, Löwik CAM, Ploegmakers JJW, Dijkstra SPD, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Jutte PC. Periprosthetic joint infection in orthopaedic surgical oncology. Ann Joint 2019. [DOI: 10.21037/aoj.2019.05.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
5
|
Löwik CAM, Zijlstra WP, Knobben BAS, Ploegmakers JJW, Dijkstra B, de Vries AJ, Kampinga GA, Mithoe G, Al Moujahid A, Jutte PC, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. Obese patients have higher rates of polymicrobial and Gram-negative early periprosthetic joint infections of the hip than non-obese patients. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0215035. [PMID: 30958847 PMCID: PMC6453483 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Obese patients are more likely to develop periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total joint arthroplasty. This study compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics of non-obese, obese and severely obese patients with early PJI, in order to ultimately optimize antibiotic prophylaxis and other prevention measures for this specific patient category. Methods We retrospectively evaluated patients with early PJI of the hip and knee treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) between 2006 and 2016 in three Dutch hospitals. Only patients with primary arthroplasties indicated for osteoarthritis were included. Early PJI was defined as an infection that developed within 90 days after index surgery. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥30kg/m2 and severe obesity as a BMI ≥35kg/m2. Results A total of 237 patients were analyzed, including 64 obese patients (27.0%) and 62 severely obese patients (26.2%). Compared with non-obese patients, obese patients had higher rates of polymicrobial infections (60.3% vs 33.3%, p<0.001) with more often involvement of Enterococcus species (27.0% vs 11.7%, p = 0.003). Moreover, severely obese patients had more Gram-negative infections, especially with Proteus species (12.9% vs 2.3%, p = 0.001). These results were only found in periprosthetic hip infections, comprising Gram-negative PJIs in 34.2% of severely obese patients compared with 24.7% in obese patients and 12.7% in non-obese patients (p = 0.018). Conclusions Our results demonstrate that obese patients with early periprosthetic hip infections have higher rates of polymicrobial infections with enterococci and Gram-negative rods, which stresses the importance of improving preventive strategies in this specific patient category, by adjusting antibiotic prophylaxis regimens, improving disinfection strategies and optimizing postoperative wound care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A. M. Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Wierd P. Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas A. S. Knobben
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joris J. W. Ploegmakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Baukje Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid J. de Vries
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Greetje A. Kampinga
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Glen Mithoe
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Certe Medical Diagnostics and Advice, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Aziz Al Moujahid
- Center for Infectious Diseases Friesland, Izore, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Paul C. Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Löwik CAM, Jutte PC, Tornero E, Ploegmakers JJW, Knobben BAS, de Vries AJ, Zijlstra WP, Dijkstra B, Soriano A, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. Predicting Failure in Early Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: External Validation of the KLIC Score. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:2582-2587. [PMID: 29691168 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a widely used treatment modality for early acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A preoperative risk score was previously designed for predicting DAIR failure, consisting of chronic renal failure (K), liver cirrhosis (L), index surgery (I), cemented prosthesis (C), and C-reactive protein >115 mg/L (KLIC). The aim of this study was to validate the KLIC score in an external cohort. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated patients with early acute PJI treated with DAIR between 2006 and 2016 in 3 Dutch hospitals. Early acute PJI was defined as <21 days of symptoms and DAIR performed within 90 days after index surgery. Failure was defined as the need for (1) second DAIR, (2) implant removal, (3) suppressive antimicrobial treatment, or (4) infection-related death within 60 days after debridement. RESULTS A total of 386 patients were included. Failure occurred in 148 patients (38.3%). Patients with KLIC scores of ≤2, 2.5-3.5, 4-5, 5.5-6.5, and ≥7 had failure rates of 27.9%, 37.1%, 49.3%, 54.5%, and 85.7%, respectively (P < .001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.69). A KLIC score higher than 6 points showed a specificity of 97.9%. CONCLUSION The KLIC score is a relatively good preoperative risk score for DAIR failure in patients with early acute PJI and appears to be most useful in clinical practice for patients with low or high KLIC scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A M Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eduard Tornero
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Joris J W Ploegmakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas A S Knobben
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid J de Vries
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wierd P Zijlstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Baukje Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Soriano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Löwik CAM, Wagenaar FC, van der Weegen W, Poolman RW, Nelissen RGHH, Bulstra SK, Pronk Y, Vermeulen KM, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, van den Akker-Scheek I, Stevens M, Jutte PC. LEAK study: design of a nationwide randomised controlled trial to find the best way to treat wound leakage after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e018673. [PMID: 29288184 PMCID: PMC5770823 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are highly successful treatment modalities for advanced osteoarthritis. However, prolonged wound leakage after arthroplasty is linked to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is a potentially devastating complication. On the one hand, wound leakage is reported as a risk factor for PJI with a leaking wound acting as a porte d'entrée for micro-organisms. On the other hand, prolonged wound leakage can be a symptom of PJI. Literature addressing prolonged wound leakage is scarce, contradictory and of poor methodological quality. Hence, treatment of prolonged wound leakage varies considerably with both non-surgical and surgical treatment modalities. There is a definite need for evidence concerning the best way to treat prolonged wound leakage after joint arthroplasty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A prospective nationwide randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 35 hospitals in the Netherlands. The goal is to include 388 patients with persistent wound leakage 9-10 days after THA or TKA. These patients will be randomly allocated to non-surgical treatment (pressure bandages, (bed) rest and wound care) or surgical treatment (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR)). DAIR will also be performed on all non-surgically treated patients with persistent wound leakage at day 16-17 after index surgery, regardless of amount of wound leakage, other clinical parameters or C reactive protein. Clinical data are entered into a web-based database. Patients are asked to fill in questionnaires about disease-specific outcomes, quality of life and cost effectiveness at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Primary outcome is the number of revision surgeries due to infection within a year of arthroplasty. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Review Board of each participating hospital has approved the local feasibility. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR5960;Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A M Löwik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Rudolf W Poolman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd K Bulstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Pronk
- Research Department, Kliniek Viasana, Mill, The Netherlands
| | - Karin M Vermeulen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Stevens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul C Jutte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|