1
|
Craxford S, Vris A, Ahluwalia R, Saini A, Harrison WD, Graham S, Sharma H. Fracture related infection in open tibial fractures. J Orthop 2024; 51:98-102. [PMID: 38357441 PMCID: PMC10862397 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Open tibia fractures frequently occur following high-energy trauma. Contamination of the fracture site combined with limited soft tissue coverage and blood supply means that these open fractures are associated with a high rate of complications, including fracture related infection (FRI). FRI is associated with lowered patient outcomes and requires early recognition and appropriate surgical and medical management. The current evidence on FRI after open tibial fractures largely is limited to case series, small retrospective cohort studies and expert opinion. Recent expert consensus has produced guidelines with the aim of standardising care for these patients. This review summarises the current management strategies employed in treating FRI following open tibial fractures and where possible the evidence behind them.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hewson DW, Nightingale J, Ogollah R, Ollivere BJ, Costa ML, Craxford S, Bates P, Bedforth NM. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for the Early Analgesia of Rib Fractures in Trauma (ESPEAR): protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial with feasibility and embedded qualitative assessment. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062935. [PMID: 36130745 PMCID: PMC9494559 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with rib fractures commonly experience significant acute pain and are at risk of hypoxia, retained secretions, respiratory failure and death. Effective analgesia improves these outcomes. There is widespread variation in analgesic treatments given to patients including oral, intravenous and epidural routes of administration. Erector spinae plane (ESP) blockade, a novel regional analgesic technique, may be effective, but high-quality evidence is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS To determine if a definitive trial of ESP blockade in rib fractures is possible, we are conducting a multicentre, randomised controlled pilot study with feasibility and qualitative assessment. Fifty adult patients with rib fractures will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to ESP blockade with multimodal analgesia or placebo ESP blockade with multimodal analgesia. Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded. The primary feasibility outcomes are recruitment rate, retention rate and trial acceptability assessed by interview. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Oxford B Research Ethics Committee on 22 February 2022 (REC reference: 22/SC/0005). All participants will provide written consent. Trial results will be reported via peer review and to grant funders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN49307616.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Hewson
- Department of Anaesthesia, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jessica Nightingale
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Reuben Ogollah
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew L Costa
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Academic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Nigel M Bedforth
- Department of Anaesthesia, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ikram A, Norrish AR, Marson BA, Craxford S, Gladman JRF, Ollivere BJ. Can the Clinical Frailty Scale on admission predict 30-day survival, postoperative complications, and institutionalization in patients with fragility hip fracture? : a cohort study of 1,255 patients. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:980-986. [PMID: 35909371 PMCID: PMC9948448 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b8.bjj-2020-1835.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We assessed the value of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in the prediction of adverse outcome after hip fracture. METHODS Of 1,577 consecutive patients aged > 65 years with a fragility hip fracture admitted to one institution, for whom there were complete data, 1,255 (72%) were studied. Clinicians assigned CFS scores on admission. Audit personnel routinely prospectively completed the Standardised Audit of Hip Fracture in Europe form, including the following outcomes: 30-day survival; in-hospital complications; length of acute hospital stay; and new institutionalization. The relationship between the CFS scores and outcomes was examined graphically and the visual interpretations were tested statistically. The predictive values of the CFS and Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) to predict 30-day mortality were compared using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS Significant non-linear associations between CFS and outcomes were observed. Risk of death within 30 days rose linearly for CFS 1 to 5, but plateaued for CFS > 5. The incidence of complications and length of stay rose linearly for CFS 1 to 4, but plateaued for CFS > 4. In contrast, the risk of new institutionalization rose linearly for CFS 1 to 8. The AUCs for 30-day mortality for the CFS and NHFS were very similar: CFS AUC 0.63 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.69) and NHFS AUC 0.63 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.69). CONCLUSION Use of the CFS may provide useful information on outcomes for fitter patients presenting with hip fracture, but completion of the CFS by the admitting orthopaedic team does not appear successful in distinguishing between higher CFS categories, which define patients with frailty. This makes a strong case for the role of the orthogeriatrician in the early assessment of these patients. Further work is needed to understand why patients assessed as being of mild, moderate, and severe frailty do not result in different outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):980-986.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeel Ikram
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK,University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alan R. Norrish
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK,Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn, UK
| | - Ben A. Marson
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK,University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK,University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John R. F. Gladman
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK,University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, UK,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ben J. Ollivere
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK,University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, UK,Correspondence should be sent to Ben J. Ollivere. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marson BA, Ikram A, Craxford S, Lewis SR, Price KR, Ollivere BJ. Interventions for treating supracondylar elbow fractures in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD013609. [PMID: 35678077 PMCID: PMC9178297 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013609.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elbow supracondylar fractures are common, with treatment decisions based on fracture displacement. However, there remains controversy regarding the best treatments for this injury. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of interventions for treating supracondylar elbow fractures in children. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2021. We also searched trial registers and reference lists. We applied no language or publication restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing different interventions for the treatment of supracondylar elbow fractures in children. We included studies investigating surgical interventions (different fixation techniques and different reduction techniques), surgical versus non-surgical treatment, traction types, methods of non-surgical intervention, and timing and location of treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We collected data and conducted GRADE assessment for five critical outcomes: functional outcomes, treatment failure (requiring re-intervention), nerve injury, major complications (pin site infection in most studies), and cosmetic deformity (cubitus varus). MAIN RESULTS: We included 52 trials with 3594 children who had supracondylar elbow fractures; most were Gartland 2 and 3 fractures. The mean ages of children ranged from 4.9 to 8.4 years and the majority of participants were boys. Most studies (33) were conducted in countries in South-East Asia. We identified 12 different comparisons of interventions: retrograde lateral wires versus retrograde crossed wires; lateral crossed (Dorgan) wires versus retrograde crossed wires; retrograde lateral wires versus lateral crossed (Dorgan) wires; retrograde crossed wires versus posterior intrafocal wires; retrograde lateral wires in a parallel versus divergent configuration; retrograde crossed wires using a mini-open technique or inserted percutaneously; buried versus non-buried wires; external versus internal fixation; open versus closed reduction; surgical fixation versus non-surgical immobilisation; skeletal versus skin traction; and collar and cuff versus backslab. We report here the findings of four comparisons that represent the most substantial body of evidence for the most clinically relevant comparisons. All studies in these four comparisons had unclear risks of bias in at least one domain. We downgraded the certainty of all outcomes for serious risks of bias, for imprecision when evidence was derived from a small sample size or had a wide confidence interval (CI) that included the possibility of benefits or harms for both treatments, and when we detected the possibility of publication bias. Retrograde lateral wires versus retrograde crossed wires (29 studies, 2068 children) There was low-certainty evidence of less nerve injury with retrograde lateral wires (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.90; 28 studies, 1653 children). In a post hoc subgroup analysis, we noted a greater difference in the number of children with nerve injuries when lateral wires were compared to crossed wires inserted with a percutaneous medial wire technique (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.81, favours lateral wires; 10 studies, 552 children), but little difference when an open technique was used (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.40, favours lateral wires; 11 studies, 656 children). Although we noted a statistically significant difference between these subgroups from the interaction test (P = 0.05), we could not rule out the possibility that other factors could account for this difference. We found little or no difference between the interventions in major complications, which were described as pin site infections in all studies (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.79; 19 studies, 1126 children; low-certainty evidence). For functional status (1 study, 35 children), treatment failure requiring re-intervention (1 study, 60 children), and cosmetic deformity (2 studies, 95 children), there was very low-certainty evidence showing no evidence of a difference between interventions. Open reduction versus closed reduction (4 studies, 295 children) Type of reduction method may make little or no difference to nerve injuries (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.01, favours open reduction; 3 studies, 163 children). However, there may be fewer major complications (pin site infections) when closed reduction is used (RR 4.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 16.20; 4 studies, 253 children). The certainty of the evidence for these outcomes is low. No studies reported functional outcome, treatment failure requiring re-intervention, or cosmetic deformity. The four studies in this comparison used direct visualisation during surgery. One additional study used a joystick technique for reduction, and we did not combine data from this study in analyses. Surgical fixation using wires versus non-surgical immobilisation using a cast (3 studies, 140 children) There was very low-certainty evidence showing little or no difference between interventions for treatment failure requiring re-intervention (1 study, 60 children), nerve injury (3 studies, 140 children), major complications (3 studies, 126 children), and cosmetic deformity (2 studies, 80 children). No studies reported functional outcome. Backslab versus sling (1 study, 50 children) No nerve injuries or major complications were experienced by children in either group; this evidence is of very low certainty. Functional outcome, treatment failure, and cosmetic deformity were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found insufficient evidence for many treatments of supracondylar fractures. Fixation of displaced supracondylar fractures with retrograde lateral wires compared with crossed wires provided the most substantial body of evidence in this review, and our findings indicate that there may be a lower risk of nerve injury with retrograde lateral wires. In future trials of treatments, we would encourage the adoption of a core outcome set, which includes patient-reported measures. Evaluation of the effectiveness of traction compared with surgical fixation would provide a valuable addition to this clinical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adeel Ikram
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sharon R Lewis
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kathryn R Price
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Craxford S, Marson BA, Nightingale J, Forward DP, Taylor A, Ollivere B. Surgical fixation of rib fractures improves 30-day survival after significant chest injury : an analysis of ten years of prospective registry data from England and Wales. Bone Joint J 2022; 104-B:729-735. [PMID: 35638213 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b6.bjj-2021-1502.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The last decade has seen a marked increase in surgical rib fracture fixation (SRF). The evidence to support this comes largely from retrospective cohorts, and adjusting for the effect of other injuries sustained at the same time is challenging. This study aims to assess the impact of SRF after blunt chest trauma using national prospective registry data, while controlling for other comorbidities and injuries. METHODS A ten-year extract from the Trauma Audit and Research Network formed the study sample. Patients who underwent SRF were compared with those who received supportive care alone. The analysis was performed first for the entire eligible cohort, and then for patients with a serious (thoracic Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3) or minor (thoracic AIS < 3) chest injury without significant polytrauma. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimators and multivariable Cox regression were performed to adjust for the effects of concomitant injuries and other comorbidities. Outcomes assessed were 30-day mortality, length of stay (LoS), and need for tracheostomy. RESULTS A total of 86,838 cases were analyzed. The rate of SRF was 1.2%. SRF significantly reduced risk of mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.27 (95 confidence interval (CI) 0.128 to 0.273); p < 0.001) and need for tracheostomy (OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.191 to 0.319); p < 0.001) after adjustment for other covariables across the whole cohort. SRF remained protective in patients with a serious chest injury (hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.45); p < 0.001). The benefit in more minor chest injury was less clear. Mean LoS for patients who survived was longer in the SRF group (24.29 days (SD 26.54) vs 16.60 days (SD 26.35); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION SRF reduces mortality after significant chest trauma associated with both major and minor polytrauma. The rate of fixation in the UK is low and potentially underused as a treatment for severe chest wall injury. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):729-735.
Collapse
|
6
|
Astbury S, Reynolds CJ, Butler DK, Muñoz‐Sandoval DC, Lin K, Pieper FP, Otter A, Kouraki A, Cusin L, Nightingale J, Vijay A, Craxford S, Aithal GP, Tighe PJ, Gibbons JM, Pade C, Joy G, Maini M, Chain B, Semper A, Brooks T, Ollivere BJ, McKnight Á, Noursadeghi M, Treibel TA, Manisty C, Moon JC, Valdes AM, Boyton RJ, Altmann DM. HLA-DR polymorphism in SARS-CoV-2 infection and susceptibility to symptomatic COVID-19. Immunology 2022; 166:68-77. [PMID: 35156709 PMCID: PMC9111350 DOI: 10.1111/imm.13450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection results in different outcomes ranging from asymptomatic infection to mild or severe disease and death. Reasons for this diversity of outcome include differences in challenge dose, age, gender, comorbidity and host genomic variation. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms may influence immune response and disease outcome. We investigated the association of HLAII alleles with case definition symptomatic COVID-19, virus-specific antibody and T-cell immunity. A total of 1364 UK healthcare workers (HCWs) were recruited during the first UK SARS-CoV-2 wave and analysed longitudinally, encompassing regular PCR screening for infection, symptom reporting, imputation of HLAII genotype and analysis for antibody and T-cell responses to nucleoprotein (N) and spike (S). Of 272 (20%) HCW who seroconverted, the presence of HLA-DRB1*13:02 was associated with a 6·7-fold increased risk of case definition symptomatic COVID-19. In terms of immune responsiveness, HLA-DRB1*15:02 was associated with lower nucleocapsid T-cell responses. There was no association between DRB1 alleles and anti-spike antibody titres after two COVID vaccine doses. However, HLA DRB1*15:01 was associated with increased spike T-cell responses following both first and second dose vaccination. Trial registration: NCT04318314 and ISRCTN15677965.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Astbury
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases CentreSchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | | | - David K. Butler
- Department of Infectious DiseaseImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Kai‐Min Lin
- Department of Infectious DiseaseImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Ashley Otter
- National Infection ServicePublic Health EnglandPorton DownUK
| | - Afroditi Kouraki
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and DermatologySchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Lola Cusin
- School of Life SciencesUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Jessica Nightingale
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and DermatologySchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Amrita Vijay
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and DermatologySchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and DermatologySchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Guruprasad P. Aithal
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases CentreSchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | | | - Joseph M. Gibbons
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryBlizard InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Corinna Pade
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryBlizard InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - George Joy
- Barts Heart CentreSt. Bartholomew's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Mala Maini
- Division of Infection and ImmunityUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Benny Chain
- Division of Infection and ImmunityUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Amanda Semper
- National Infection ServicePublic Health EnglandPorton DownUK
| | - Timothy Brooks
- National Infection ServicePublic Health EnglandPorton DownUK
| | - Benjamin J. Ollivere
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and DermatologySchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Áine McKnight
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryBlizard InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Thomas A. Treibel
- Barts Heart CentreSt. Bartholomew's HospitalLondonUK
- Institute of Cardiovascular SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Charlotte Manisty
- Barts Heart CentreSt. Bartholomew's HospitalLondonUK
- Institute of Cardiovascular SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - James C. Moon
- Barts Heart CentreSt. Bartholomew's HospitalLondonUK
- Institute of Cardiovascular SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ana M. Valdes
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and DermatologySchool of MedicineUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Rosemary J. Boyton
- Department of Infectious DiseaseImperial College LondonLondonUK
- Lung DivisionRoyal Brompton and Harefield HospitalsGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Daniel M. Altmann
- Department of Immunology and InflammationImperial College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hall AJ, Clement ND, Ojeda-Thies C, MacLullich AMJ, Toro G, Johansen A, White TO, Duckworth AD, Abdul-Jabar H, Abu-Rajab R, Abugarja A, Adam K, Aguado Hernández HJ, Améstica Lazcano G, Anderson S, Ansar M, Antrobus J, Aragón Achig EJ, Archunan M, Arrieta Salinas M, Ashford-Wilson S, Assens Gibert C, Athanasopoulou K, Awadelkarim M, Baird S, Bajada S, Balakrishnan S, Balasubramanian S, Ballantyne JA, Bárcena Goitiandia L, Barkham B, Barmpagianni C, Barres-Carsi M, Barrett S, Baskaran D, Bell J, Bell K, Bell S, Bellelli G, Benchimol JA, Boietti BR, Boswell S, Braile A, Brennan C, Brent L, Brooke B, Bruno G, Burahee A, Burns S, Calabrò G, Campbell L, Carabelli GS, Carnegie C, Carretero Cristobal G, Caruana E, Cassinello Ogea MC, Castellanos Robles J, Castillon P, Chakrabarti A, Cecere AB, Chen P, Clarke JV, Collins G, Corrales Cardenal JE, Corsi M, Cózar Adelantado GM, Craxford S, Crooks M, Cuarental-García J, Cuthbert R, Dall G, Daskalakis I, De Cicco A, Diana DLFDD, Demaria P, Dereix J, Díaz Jiménez J, Dinamarca Montecinos JL, Do Le HP, Donoso Coppa JP, Drosos G, Duffy A, East J, Eastwood D, Elbahari H, Elias de Molins Peña C, Elmamoun M, Emmerson B, Escobar Sánchez D, Faimali M, Farré-Mercadé MV, Farrow L, Fayez A, Fell A, Fenner C, Ferguson D, Finlayson L, Flores Gómez A, Freeman N, French J, Gabardo Calvo S, Gagliardo N, Garcia Albiñana J, García Cruz G, García de Cortázar Antolín U, García Virto V, Gealy S, Gil Caballero SM, Gill M, González González MS, Gopireddy R, Guntley D, Gurung B, Guzmán Rosales G, Haddad N, Hafeez M, Haller P, Halligan E, Hardie J, Hawker I, Helal A, Herrera Cruz M, Herreros Ruiz-Valdepeñas R, Horton J, Howells S, Howieson A, Hughes L, Hünicken Torrez FL, Hurtado Ortega A, Huxley P, Hamid HK, Ilahi N, Iliadis A, Inman D, Jadhao P, Jandoo R, Jawad L, Jayatilaka MLT, Jenkins PJ, Jeyapalan R, Johnson D, Johnston A, Joseph S, Kapoor S, Karagiannidis G, Karanam KS, Kattakayam F, Konarski A, Kontakis G, Labrador Hernández G, Lancaster V, Landi G, Le B, Liew I, Logishetty K, Lopez Marquez ACD, Lopez J, Lum J, Macpherson GJ, Madan S, Mahroof S, Malik-Tabassum K, Mallina R, Maqsood A, Marson B, Martin Legorburo MJ, Martin-Perez E, Martínez Jiménez T, Martinez Martin J, Mayne A, Mayor A, McAlinden G, McLean L, McDonald L, McIntyre J, McKay P, McKean G, McShane H, Medici A, Meeke C, Meldrum E, Mendez M, Mercer S, Merino Perez J, Mesa-Lampré MP, Mighton S, Milne K, Mohamed Yaseen M, Moppett I, Mora J, Morales-Zumel S, Moreno Fenoll IB, Mousa A, Murray AW, Murray EV, Nair R, Neary F, Negri G, Negus O, Newham-Harvey F, Ng N, Nightingale J, Noor Mohamed Anver S, Nunag P, O'Hare M, Ollivere B, Ortés Gómez R, Owens A, Page S, Palloni V, Panagiotopoulos A, Panagiotopoulos E, Panesar P, Papadopoulos A, Spyridon P, Pareja Sierra T, Park C, Parwaiz H, Paterson-Byrne P, Patton S, Pearce J, Porter M, Pellegrino A, Pèrez Cuellar A, Pezzella R, Phadnis A, Pinder C, Piper D, Powell-Bowns M, Prieto Martín R, Probert A, Ramesh A, Ramírez de Arellano MVM, Renton D, Rickman S, Robertson A, Roche Albero A, Rodrigo Verguizas JA, Rodríguez Couso M, Rooney J, Sáez-López P, Saldaña-Díaz A, Santulli A, Sanz Pérez MI, Sarraf KM, Scarsbrook C, Scott CE, Scott J, Shah S, Sharaf S, Sharma S, Shirley D, Siano A, Simpson J, Singh A, Singh A, Sinnett T, Sisodia G, Smith P, Sophena Bert E, Steel M, Stewart A, Stewart C, Sugand K, Sullivan N, Sweeting L, Symes M, Tan DJH, Tancredi F, Tatani I, Thomas P, Thomson F, Toner NS, Tong A, Toro A, Tosounidis T, Tottas S, Trinidad Leo A, Tucker D, Vemulapalli K, Ventura Garces D, Vernon OK, Viveros Garcia JC, Ward A, Ward K, Watson K, Weerasuriya T, Wickramanayake U, Wilkinson H, Windley J, Wood J, Wynell-Mayow W, Zatti G, Zeiton M, Zurrón Lobato M. IMPACT-Global Hip Fracture Audit: Nosocomial infection, risk prediction and prognostication, minimum reporting standards and global collaborative audit. Lessons from an international multicentre study of 7,090 patients conducted in 14 nations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgeon 2022; 20:e429-e446. [PMID: 35430111 PMCID: PMC8958101 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Aims This international study aimed to assess: 1) the prevalence of preoperative and postoperative COVID-19 among patients with hip fracture, 2) the effect on 30-day mortality, and 3) clinical factors associated with the infection and with mortality in COVID-19-positive patients. Methods A multicentre collaboration among 112 centres in 14 countries collected data on all patients presenting with a hip fracture between 1st March-31st May 2020. Demographics, residence, place of injury, presentation blood tests, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score, time to surgery, management, ASA grade, length of stay, COVID-19 and 30-day mortality status were recorded. Results A total of 7090 patients were included, with a mean age of 82.2 (range 50–104) years and 4959 (69.9%) being female. Of 651 (9.2%) patients diagnosed with COVID-19, 225 (34.6%) were positive at presentation and 426 (65.4%) were positive postoperatively. Positive COVID-19 status was independently associated with male sex (odds ratio (OR) 1.38, p = 0.001), residential care (OR 2.15, p < 0.001), inpatient fall (OR 2.23, p = 0.003), cancer (OR 0.63, p = 0.009), ASA grades 4 (OR 1.59, p = 0.008) or 5 (OR 8.28, p < 0.001), and longer admission (OR 1.06 for each increasing day, p < 0.001). Patients with COVID-19 at any time had a significantly lower chance of 30-day survival versus those without COVID-19 (72.7% versus 92.6%, p < 0.001). COVID-19 was independently associated with an increased 30-day mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR) 2.83, p < 0.001). Increasing age (HR 1.03, p = 0.028), male sex (HR 2.35, p < 0.001), renal disease (HR 1.53, p = 0.017), and pulmonary disease (HR 1.45, p = 0.039) were independently associated with a higher 30-day mortality risk in patients with COVID-19 when adjusting for confounders. Conclusion The prevalence of COVID-19 in hip fracture patients during the first wave of the pandemic was 9%, and was independently associated with a three-fold increased 30-day mortality risk. Among COVID-19-positive patients, those who were older, male, with renal or pulmonary disease had a significantly higher 30-day mortality risk.
Collapse
|
8
|
Craxford S, Owyang D, Marson B, Rowlins K, Coughlin T, Forward D, Ollivere B. Surgical management of rib fractures after blunt trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021; 104:249-256. [PMID: 34928718 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple traumatic rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The last decade has seen a significant increase in rates of surgical fixation for both flail and non-flail rib fractures; the evidence for this has come from largely retrospective studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of this approach with that of non-operative management. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical stabilisation to non-operative management. Both flail and non-flail injuries were included. RESULTS Five RCTs reported the results of 286 patients. Only one study assessed non-flail fractures. The studies were heterogenic in nature and of mixed quality. Surgical stabilisation was associated with a reduction in pneumonia (RR 0.46, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.29 to 0.73, I2=42%, p=0.001). The duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -6.3, 95% CI -12.16 to -0.43, I2=95%, p=0.05) and critical care length of stay was also shorter after surgery (mean difference -6.46 days, 95% CI 9.73 to -3.19, p<0.001); however, the overall length of stay in hospital was not (MD -7.18, 95% CI -15.63 to -1.28, I2=94%, p=0.1). No study demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.8, I2=0%, p=0.28). CONCLUSIONS Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures is associated with some improved clinical outcomes. Further large RCTs are still needed to confirm if there is also a survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - B Marson
- The University of Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
AIMS Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. METHODS Patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty between March 2007 and August 2018 were reviewed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for risk factors for SSI, and to identify factors predicting a successful DAIR at one year. RESULTS A total of 3,966 patients were identified. The overall rate of SSI was 1.7% (51 patients (1.3%) with deep SSI, and 18 (0.45%) with superficial SSI). In all, 50 patients underwent revision surgery for infection (43 with DAIR, and seven with excision arthroplasty). After adjustment for other variables, only concurrent urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 4.92; p < 0.001) and increasing delay to theatre for treatment of the fracture (OR 1.31 per day, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001) were predictors of developing a SSI, while a cemented arthroplasty was protective (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.031). In all, nine patients (20.9%) were alive at one year with a functioning hemiarthroplasty following DAIR, 20 (46.5%) required multiple surgical debridements after an initial DAIR, and 18 were converted to an excision arthroplasty due to persistent infection, with six were alive at one year. The culture of any gram-negative organism reduced success rates to 12.5% (no cases were successful with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas infection). Favourable organisms included Citrobacter and Proteus (100% cure rate). The all-cause mortality at one year after deep SSI was 55.87% versus 24.9% without deep infection. CONCLUSION Deep infection remains a devastating complication regardless of the treatment strategy employed. Success rates of DAIR are poor compared to total hip arthroplasty, and should be reserved for favourable organisms in patients able to tolerate multiple surgical procedures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):958-965.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Adeel Ikram
- The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marson BA, Craxford S, Valdes AM, Ollivere BJ. Are facemasks a priority for all staff in theatre to prevent surgical site infections during shortages of supply? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 2021; 19:e132-e139. [PMID: 33039336 PMCID: PMC7539019 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The provision of facemasks must be prioritised when supplies are interrupted. These include supplies to operating rooms. The aim of this review is to evaluate the available evidence to determine the relative priority for the provision of facemasks in operating rooms to prevent surgical site infection. METHODS A systematic search of OVID Medline, Embase & Cochrane Central was completed. Candidate full-text articles were identified and analysed by two reviewers who also assessed risk of bias. FINDINGS Six studies were identified that described infections with and without facemask usage. The pooled effect of not wearing facemasks was a risk ratio for infection of 0.77 (0.62-0.97) in favour of not wearing masks. Only one case-controlled study evaluated facemask usage in implant surgery and demonstrated an odds ratio for developing infection of 3.34 (95% CI 1.94-5.74) if facemasks were not worn by the operating surgeon. Four studies collected microbiological cultures during periods in surgery with or without facemasks. Two demonstrated an increase in colony forming units in surgery where the wound was directly below the surgeon. One study showed equivocal results when masks were worn, and one was terminated early limiting interpretation. CONCLUSION The use of facemasks by scrubbed staff during implant surgery should be mandatory to prevent infection. We recommend the use of facemasks by all scrubbed staff during other forms of surgery to protect the patient and staff, but the supporting evidence is weak. There is insufficient evidence to show that non-scrubbed staff must wear masks during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Simon Craxford
- University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study is to develop a core set of outcome domains that should be considered and reported in all future trials of childhood limb fractures. Methods A four-phase study was conducted to agree a set of core outcome domains. Identification of candidate outcome domains were identified through systematic review of trials, and outcome domains relevant to families were identified through semi-structured interviews with 20 families (parent-child pairing or group). Outcome domains were prioritized using an international three-round Delphi survey with 205 panellists and then condensed into a core outcome set through a consensus workshop with 30 stakeholders. Results The systematic review and interviews identified 85 outcome domains as relevant to professionals or families. The Delphi survey prioritized 30 upper and 29 lower limb outcome domains at first round, an additional 17 upper and 18 lower limb outcomes at second round, and four additional outcomes for upper and lower limb at the third round as important domains. At the consensus workshop, the core outcome domains were agreed as: 1) pain and discomfort; 2) return to physical and recreational activities; 3) emotional and psychosocial wellbeing; 4) complications from the injury and treatment; 5) rturn to baseline activities daily living; 6) participation in learning; 7) appearance and deformity; and 8) time to union. In addition, 9a) recovery of mobility and 9b) recovery of manual dexterity was recommended as a core outcome for lower and upper limb fractures, respectively. Conclusion This set of core outcome domains is recommended as a minimum set of outcomes to be reported in all trials. It is not an exhaustive set and further work is required to identify what outcome tools should be used to measure each of these outcomes. Adoption of this outcome set will improve the consistency of research for these children that can be combined for more meaningful meta-analyses and policy development. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1821–1830.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joseph C Manning
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marilyn James
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandeep R Deshmukh
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Daniel C Perry
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khawar H, Craxford S, Marson BA, Rahman HP, Ollivere B. Outcomes after hip fractures sustained in hospital: A propensity-score matched cohort study. Injury 2021; 52:2356-2360. [PMID: 33965207 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to compare outcomes following hip fracture for patients who sustained their fracture whilst in hospital (inpatients) with those who sustained their fracture in the community (outpatients). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on all hip fracture admissions aged 65 years or over between 1st May 2007 and 31st March 2018 was analysed from a prospectively collected hip fracture database. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, and discharge information were analysed. Outcome measures included mortality (inpatient, 30-day and one year), surgical site infection (SSI) rate and mean length of stay (LOS). Baseline characteristics were used to generate propensity-match scores for each patient, with inpatients matched to outpatients in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes were compared after matching. RESULTS 7,592 patients were included in the study. 338 were identified as having an inpatient hip fracture. There was a significantly greater level of comorbidity in the inpatient group at baseline. After propensity-score matching, there were 229 patients in the inpatient group and 222 in the outpatient group, with no significant difference in baseline co-morbidities. In this propensity score matched cohort, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the inpatient group (16%) compared to the outpatient group (10%), P = 0.049. 1-year mortality was also significantly higher in the inpatient group (44%) compared to the outpatient group (34%), P = 0.03. There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality, mean LOS and SSI rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION Patients who suffer a hip fracture whilst in hospital have significantly poorer outcomes than those who suffer a hip fracture whilst an outpatient, even after adjusting for co-morbidities. Dedicated guidelines are needed for this particularly vulnerable group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Khawar
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
| | - S Craxford
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
| | - B A Marson
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
| | - H P Rahman
- Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - B Ollivere
- Academic Orthopaedics, Trauma & Sports Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valdes AM, Moon JC, Vijay A, Chaturvedi N, Norrish A, Ikram A, Craxford S, Cusin LM, Nightingale J, Semper A, Brooks T, McKnight A, Kurdi H, Menni C, Tighe P, Noursadeghi M, Aithal G, Treibel TA, Ollivere BJ, Manisty C. Longitudinal assessment of symptoms and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers across 5 hospitals to understand ethnic differences in infection risk. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 34:100835. [PMID: 33880438 PMCID: PMC8049191 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Healthcare workers (HCWs) have increased rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the general population. We aimed to understand ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among hospital healthcare workers depending on their hospital role, socioeconomic status, Covid-19 symptoms and basic demographics. METHODS A prospective longitudinal observational cohort study. 1364 HCWs at five UK hospitals were studied with up to 16 weeks of symptom questionnaires and antibody testing (to both nucleocapsid and spike protein) during the first UK wave in five NHS hospitals between March 20 and July 10 2020. The main outcome measures were SARS-CoV-2 infection (seropositivity at any time-point) and symptoms. Registration number: NCT04318314. FINDINGS 272 of 1364 HCWs (mean age 40.7 years, 72% female, 74% White, ≥6 samples per participant) seroconverted, reporting predominantly mild or no symptoms. Seropositivity was lower in Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) workers (OR=0.44 95%CI 0.24, 0.77; p=0.0035). Seropositivity was higher in Black (compared to White) participants, independent of age, sex, role and index of multiple deprivation (OR=2.61 95%CI 1.47-4.62 p=0.0009). No association was seen between White HCWs and other minority ethnic groups. INTERPRETATION In the UK first wave, Black ethnicity (but not other ethnicities) more than doubled HCWs likelihood of seropositivity, independent of age, sex, measured socio-economic factors and hospital role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M. Valdes
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
- Corresponding Author: Professor Ana Valdes, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Tel: (+44)0115 823 1954
| | - James C. Moon
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amrita Vijay
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Nish Chaturvedi
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Norrish
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Adeel Ikram
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | | | - Jessica Nightingale
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Amanda Semper
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, UK
| | - Timothy Brooks
- National Infection Service, Public Health England, Porton Down, UK
| | - Aine McKnight
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Hibba Kurdi
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cristina Menni
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Patrick Tighe
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RB
| | - Mahdad Noursadeghi
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Guruprasad Aithal
- Nottingham Digestive Disease Centre, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| | - Thomas A. Treibel
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin J. Ollivere
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Charlotte Manisty
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marson BA, Ng JWG, Craxford S, Chell J, Lawniczak D, Price KR, Ollivere BJ, Hunter JB. Treatment of completely displaced distal radial fractures with a straight plaster or manipulation under anaesthesia. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:902-907. [PMID: 33709769 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b.bjj-2020-1740.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The management of completely displaced fractures of the distal radius in children remains controversial. This study evaluates the outcomes of surgical and non-surgical management of 'off-ended' fractures in children with at least two years of potential growth remaining. METHODS A total of 34 boys and 22 girls aged 0 to ten years with a closed, completely displaced metaphyseal distal radial fracture presented between 1 November 2015 and 1 January 2020. After 2018, children aged ten or under were offered treatment in a straight plaster or manipulation under anaesthesia with Kirschner (K-)wire stabilization. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to evaluate outcomes. In all, 16 underwent treatment in a straight cast and 40 had manipulation under anaesthesia, including 37 stabilized with K-wires. RESULTS Of the children treated in a straight cast, all were discharged with good range of mo (ROM). Five children were discharged at six to 12 weeks with no functional limitations at six-month follow-up. A total of 11 children were discharged between 12 and 50 weeks with a normal ROM and radiological evidence of remodelling. One child had a subsequent diaphyseal fracture proximal to the original injury four years after the initial fracture. Re-displacement with angulation greater than 10° occurred for 17 children who had manipulation under anaesthesia. Four had a visible cosmetic deformity at discharge and nine had restriction of movement, with four requiring physiotherapy. One child developed over- granulation at the pin site and one wire became buried, resulting in a difficult retrieval in clinic. No children had pin site infections. CONCLUSION Nonoperative management of completely displaced distal radial fractures in appropriately selected cases results in excellent outcomes without exposing the child to the risks of surgery. This study suggests that nonoperative management of these injuries is a viable and potentially underused strategy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):902-907.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jimmy W G Ng
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.,Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Julian Chell
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dominik Lawniczak
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kathryn R Price
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ben J Ollivere
- Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - James B Hunter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
AIMS Infection after surgery increases treatment costs and is associated with increased mortality. Hip fracture patients have historically had high rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and surgical site infection (SSI). This paper reports the impact of routine MRSA screening and the "cleanyourhands" campaign on rates of MRSA SSI and patient outcome. METHODS A total of 13,503 patients who presented with a hip fracture over 17 years formed the study population. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for MRSA and SSI. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling adjusted for temporal trends in rates of MRSA. Kaplan-Meier estimators were generated to assess for changes in mortality. RESULTS In all, 6,189 patients were identified before the introduction of screening and 7,314 in the post-screening cohort. MRSA infection fell from 69 cases to 15 in the post-screening cohort (p < 0.001). The ARIMA confirmed a significant reduction in MRSA SSI post-screening (p = 0.043) but no significant impact after hand hygiene alone (p = 0.121). Overall SSI fell (2.4% to 1.5%), however deep infection increased slightly (0.89% to 1.06%). ARIMA showed neither intervention affected overall SSI ("cleanyourhands" -0.172% (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.39% to 0.21); p = 0.122, screening -0.113% per year, (95% CI -0.34 to 0.12); p = 0.373). One-year mortality after deep SSI was unchanged after screening (50% vs 45%; p = 0.415). Only warfarinization (OR 3.616 (95% CI 1.366 to 9.569); p = 0.010) and screening (OR 0.189 (95% CI 0.086 to 0.414); p < 0.001) were significant covariables for developing MRSA SSI. CONCLUSION While screening and decolonization may reduce MRSA-associated SSI, the benefit to patient outcome remains unclear. Overall deep SSI remains an unsolved problem that has seen little improvement over time. Preventing other hospital-associated infections should not be forgotten in the fight against MRSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):170-177.
Collapse
|
16
|
Marson BA, Craxford S, Deshmukh SR, Grindlay DJC, Manning JC, Ollivere BJ. Quality of patient-reported outcomes used for quality of life, physical function, and functional capacity in trials of childhood fractures. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:1599-1607. [PMID: 33249895 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b12.bjj-2020-0732.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study evaluates the quality of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) reported in childhood fracture trials and recommends outcome measures to assess and report physical function, functional capacity, and quality of life using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) standards. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review of OVID Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed to identify all PROMs reported in trials. A search of OVID Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO was performed to identify all PROMs with validation studies in childhood fractures. Development studies were identified through hand-searching. Data extraction was undertaken by two reviewers. Study quality and risk of bias was evaluated by COSMIN guidelines and recorded on standardized checklists. RESULTS Searches yielded 13,672 studies, which were screened to identify 124 trials and two validation studies. Review of the 124 trials identified 16 reported PROMs, of which two had validation studies. The development papers were retrieved for all PROMs. The quality of the original development studies was adequate for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Mobility and Upper Extremity and doubtful for the EuroQol Five Dimension Youth questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y). All other PROMs were found to have inadequate development studies. No content validity studies were identified. Reviewer-rated content validity was acceptable for six PROMs: Activity Scale for Kids (ASK), Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire, PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Mobility, EQ-5D-Y, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL4.0). The Modified Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was shown to have indeterminate reliability and convergence validity in one study and PROMIS Upper Extremity had insufficient convergence validity in one study. CONCLUSION There is insufficient evidence to recommend strongly the use of any single PROM to assess and report physical function or quality of life following childhood fractures. There is a need to conduct validation studies for PROMs. In the absence of these studies, we cautiously recommend the use of the PROMIS or ASK-P for physical function and the PedsQL4.0 or EQ-5D-Y for quality of life. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1599-1607.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandeep R Deshmukh
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Douglas J C Grindlay
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joseph C Manning
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Aims To analyze outcomes reported in trials of childhood fractures. Methods OVID MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched on the eighth August 2019. A manual search of trial registries, bibliographic review and internet search was used to identify additional studies. 11,476 studies were screened following PRISMA guidelines. 100 trials were included in the analysis. Data extraction was completed by two researchers for each trial. Study quality was not evaluated. Outcomes reported by trials were mapped onto domains in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Function framework. Results In all, 525 outcomes were identified representing 52 WHO domains. Four domains were reported in more than 50% of trials: structure of upper/lower limb, sensation of pain, mobility of joint function, and health services, systems and policies. The Activities Scale for Kids performance (ASK-p) score was the most common outcome score reported in 6/72 upper limb and 4/28 lower limb trials. Conclusion There is a diverse range of outcomes reported in trials of childhood fractures covering all areas in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. There were three common upper limb and three common lower limb outcomes. In the absence of a core outcome set, we recommend that upper limb trials report pain, range of movement and radiograph appearance of the arm and lower limb trials report pain, radiograph appearance of the leg and healthcare costs to improve consistency of reporting in future trials. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-5:167–174.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandeep R Deshmukh
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Douglas Grindlay
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joseph Manning
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham; Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Queens' Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| | - Kathryn R Price
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics; Nottingham University Hospitals; Nottingham UK
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics; University of Nottingham; Nottingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Radial head fractures are a common fracture involving the elbow joint. Patients typically present after a fall onto an outstretched hand with elbow pain and swelling. Without adequate treatment, this can lead to long-term complications, including loss of elbow motion and pain. Radial head fractures may also be associated with other injuries including elbow dislocation, neighbouring bony fractures and associated ligamentous rupture. It is therefore imperative that hospital clinicians understand the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The plain radiograph is the optimum method to diagnose a radial head fracture. These fractures can be managed using a variety of techniques, from non-surgical conservative methods for the undisplaced fracture through to surgical fixation, radial head replacement and excision for the more complex, displaced fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haseeb Khawar
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin Ollivere
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marson BA, Manning JC, James M, Craxford S, Deshmukh SR, Ollivere BJ. CORE-Kids: a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for childhood fractures. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036224. [PMID: 32114480 PMCID: PMC7050303 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limb fractures in children are common yet there are few trials that compare treatments for these injuries. There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes reported in the paediatric orthopaedic literature, which limits the ability to compare study results and draw firm conclusions. The aim of the CORE-Kids Study is to develop a core outcome set for use in research studies of childhood limb fractures. A core outcome set will provide a minimum set of outcomes to be measured in all trials to minimise the heterogeneity of outcomes reported and minimise reporting bias. A core outcome set ensures that outcomes are reported that are relevant to families as well as clinicians. The core outcome set will include additional upper and lower limb modules. METHODS The development of the core outcome set will require four phases to evaluate:What are the outcomes that are relevant to professionals?What are the outcomes that are relevant to families?What are the most important of these outcomes?Which outcomes should be included in the core outcome set?This will be completed through a systematic review of trials to identify the outcomes domains that are relevant to trialists. A series of semi-structured interviews will be completed with families to identify the outcome domains that are relevant to families. These outcome domains will be used in a three-round Delphi Study to analyse the importance of these outcome domains to a range of stakeholders including parents, clinicians and researchers. Following this, the core outcome set will be decided at a consensus meeting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been awarded HRA/REC IRAS number 262503. Date of approval 06/08/2019. Dissemination will be through scientific literature and international societies. TRIAL REGISTRATION Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative, registration number: 1274. Date of registration 13/12/2018. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018106605.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph C Manning
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marilyn James
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Trauma Outcomes Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Craxford S, Deacon C, Myint Y, Ollivere B. Assessing outcome measures used after rib fracture: A COSMIN systematic review. Injury 2019; 50:1816-1825. [PMID: 31353094 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of invasive treatment of rib fracture has increased significantly over the last decade however the evidence of improved patient outcomes to support this is lacking. A systematic review was performed to identify patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in the assessment of outcomes following chest wall injury. The quality of evidence for the psychometric properties of the identified PROMs was graded using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. METHODS Rib fracture studies measuring patient reported outcomes were identified using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, AMED and PsycINFO. Methodological quality of measurement properties was evaluated with the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. RESULTS A total of 64 studies were identified including 19 different PROM instruments. Domains included in the reported PROMs included pain, breathlessness, general health quality of life, physical function and physiological health. No rib fracture specific PROM was identified. The most frequently reported instrument was the SF-36 reporting overall quality of life (HRQoL) although there was very low quality evidence for its content validity. There was low quality evidence to support good content validity for the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, Brief Pain Index (BPI) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). No PROM had undergone validation in a rib fracture population. The overall quality of the PROM development studies was poor. While we were unable to identify a clear "gold standard", based on the limited current evidence, we recommend that the EQ-5D-5L is used in combination with the MRC and BPI or MPQ for future rib fracture studies. CONCLUSION The lack of validated outcome measures for rib fracture patients is a significant limitation of the current literature. Further studies are needed to provide validated outcome measures to ensure accuracy of the reported results and conclusions. As interventions for rib fractures have become more common in both research and clinical practice this has become an urgent priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher Deacon
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Yulanda Myint
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Potential injury to the cervical spine should be considered in all patients who have suffered blunt trauma. Early spinal immobilization is required to minimize the risk of secondary spinal cord injury. However, prolonged immobilization is associated with its own morbidity. Clinical evaluation of the cervical spine in confused or unconscious adult trauma patients is challenging, and imaging is required to safely 'clear' the cervical spine. Despite the existence of national guidelines, significant variations in practice exist. This article summarizes the evidence for the initial stabilization of the cervical spine in adult trauma patients. It reviews the imaging modalities available and the criteria for discontinuation of cervical spine immobilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Deacon
- FY2 Doctor, Academic Orthopaedics, Trauma and Sports Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics, and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
| | - Simon Craxford
- Research Fellow, Academic Orthopaedics, Trauma and Sports Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics, and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Clinical Associate Professor for Trauma, Academic Orthopaedics, Trauma and Sports Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics, and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Ankle fractures are a common injury in children and adolescents - 1 in 1000 children will sustain an ankle fracture each year. Understanding the diagnosis and management of these injuries is vital for any doctor or clinician working in the emergency department, orthopaedics or providing community care. This review identifies the important features of high- and low-risk ankle fractures, how to prevent the use of unnecessary radiation and the management of these injuries. Fractures may be at high or low risk of instability and are managed accordingly. Many can be treated with conservative management in a cast, including unstable injuries following reduction. However, particular fracture patterns associated with the tibial growth plate need careful assessment of fracture reduction with cross-sectional imaging before committing to conservative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben A Marson
- PhD Research Fellow, Academic Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Sports Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
| | - Simon Craxford
- PhD Research Fellow, Academic Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Sports Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH
| | - Benjamin J Ollivere
- Associate Professor, Academic Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Sports Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Craxford S, Bayley E, Walsh M, Clamp J, Boszczyk BM, Stokes OM. Missed cervical spine injuries: a national survey of the practice of evaluation of the cervical spine in confused and comatose patients. Bone Joint J 2017; 98-B:825-8. [PMID: 27235527 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.98b6.37435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM Identifying cervical spine injuries in confused or comatose patients with multiple injuries provides a diagnostic challenge. Our aim was to investigate the protocols which are used for the clearance of the cervical spine in these patients in English hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS All hospitals in England with an Emergency Department were asked about the protocols which they use for assessing the cervical spine. All 22 Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) and 141 of 156 non-MTCs responded (response rate 91.5%). RESULTS Written guidelines were used in 138 hospitals (85%). CT scanning was the first-line investigation in 122 (75%). A normal CT scan was sufficient to clear the cervical spine in 73 (45%). However, 40 (25%) would continue precautions until the patient regained full consciousness. MRI was performed in all confused or comatose patients with a possible cervical spinal injury in 15 (9%). There were variations in the grade and speciality of the clinician who had responsibility for deciding when to discontinue precautions. A total of 31 (19%) reported at least one missed cervical spinal injury following discontinuation of spinal precautions within the last five years. Only 93 (57%) had a formal mechanism for reviewing missed injuries. TAKE HOME MESSAGE There are significant variations in protocols and practices for the clearance of the cervical spine in multiply injured patients in acute hospitals in England. The establishment of trauma networks should be taken as an opportunity to further standardise trauma care. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:825-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Craxford
- Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - E Bayley
- Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - M Walsh
- Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - J Clamp
- Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - B M Boszczyk
- Nottingham University Hospitals, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - O M Stokes
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Craxford
- ST3 in Trauma and Orthopaedics in the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics
| | - Leia Taylor
- CT2 in Medicine in the Department of General Medicine
| | | | | | - Simon Pickering
- Consultant Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon in the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby DE22 3NE
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gale M, Craxford S, Taylor L, Montgomery H, Pickering S. Thrombosis of the external jugular vein: a rare complication of a proximal humerus fracture treated with collar and cuff immobilisation. Case Rep Orthop 2014; 2014:283790. [PMID: 25247102 PMCID: PMC4163398 DOI: 10.1155/2014/283790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We report the case of an 87-year-old woman who developed a thrombosis of her external jugular vein after sustaining a proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively with a collar and cuff. At review in fracture clinic she was found to have an enlarged external jugular vein which was subsequently found to be thrombosed. Her collar and cuff had been applied very tightly and it was felt by the ENT team to be the cause of the thrombosis of her external jugular vein. She was fully anticoagulated with warfarin after subsequently developing a deep vein thrombosis in the subclavian and axillary veins. She made a full recovery following anticoagulation. In this case, we review the potential causes of this rare and underdiagnosed condition, as well as the usual investigations and treatments. We also review the common complications of this fracture and the alternative treatment options available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gale
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Simon Craxford
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Leia Taylor
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Helen Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Simon Pickering
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3NE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|