Central Implantation of the Femoral Component Relative to the Tibial Insert Improves Clinical Outcomes in Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

The impact of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency severity on the outcomes of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD) has traditionally been regarded as a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, advancements in surgical techniques and improvements in prosthetic manufacturing have challenged this notion. Controversy persists regarding whether the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) influences the postoperative outcomes of fixed-bearing (FB) UKA. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying severities of ACLD on the clinical outcomes of FB-UKA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 81 patients (87 knees) who underwent FB-UKA for anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA). Patients were categorised into three groups on the basis of preoperative MRI and intraoperative findings: the intact ACL group (31 knees), the partial ACLD group (39 knees), and the complete ACLD group (17 knees). Patient demographics (age, body mass index [BMI]), preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), follow-up duration, and preoperative and last follow-up data, collected more than one year postoperatively, were recorded, including the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS), Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), postoperative X-ray assessment of the position of the femoral component relative to the tibial component, as well as evaluation of radiolucent lines on the postoperative X-rays. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine differences in clinical outcomes, including pre-and postoperative changes, among the three groups. Postoperative complications, such as infection, aseptic loosening, prosthetic dislocation, or periprosthetic fractures requiring revision surgery, were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of age, BMI, follow-up duration, preoperative HKA, baseline Lysholm score, HSS knee score, VAS score, or ROM (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, all three groups showed significant improvements in the Lysholm score, HSS knee score, VAS score, and ROM (P < 0.001), with no significant differences in the extent of improvement among the groups (P > 0.05). The position of the femoral component relative to the tibial component did not differ significantly among the groups (P > 0.05), and no radiolucent lines were observed in any of the patients. No patients experienced complications such as infection, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, or prosthetic dislocations that required revision surgery at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

FB-UKA is a viable surgical option for the treatment of AMOA. For patients with AMOA and stable anteroposterior knee alignment, ACLD does not adversely affect short- to midterm outcomes following FB-UKA. Even in cases of partial or complete ACLD, careful patient selection and optimised surgical techniques can yield outcomes comparable to those in patients with intact ACLs.

Restoration or relative overcorrection of pre-arthritic coronal alignment leads to improved results following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

A pre-arthritic alignment strategy for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims to restore a patient's native lower limb alignment which may translate into improved outcomes. This study aimed to assess whether patients with pre-arthritically aligned knees versus patients with non-pre-arthritically aligned knees demonstrated improved mid-term outcomes and survivorship following medial UKA. The hypothesis was that pre-arthritic alignment in medial UKA would lead to better postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 537 robotic-assisted fixed-bearing medial UKA was conducted. During this procedure, the surgical goal was to restore pre-arthritic alignment guided by re-tensioning of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). For study purposes, coronal alignment was retrospectively evaluated using the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). Pre-arthritic alignment was estimated through the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) algorithm. Knees were grouped according to the difference between postoperative mHKA and estimated pre-arthritic alignment (i.e., mHKA - aHKA) as Group 1 (pre-arthritically aligned: mHKA restored within 2.0° of the aHKA), Group 2 (mHKA > 2.0° overcorrected relative to the aHKA), or Group 3 (mHKA > 2.0° undercorrected relative to the aHKA). Outcomes included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), Kujala, proportions of knees achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for these scores, and survivorship. PASS thresholds for KOOS, JR and Kujala were determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve method.

RESULTS

A total of 369 knees were categorized as Group 1, 107 as Group 2, and 61 as Group 3. At 4.4 ± 1.6 years follow-up, mean KOOS, JR was comparable among groups, while Kujala was significantly worse in Group 3. The proportion of knees achieving the PASS for Kujala (76.5 points) was lower in Group 3 (n = 32; 59%) compared to Group 1 (n = 260; 74%) (p = 0.02). 5-year survivorship was higher in Group 1 and Group 2 (99% and 100%, respectively) compared to Group 3 (91%) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Pre-arthritically aligned knees and knees with relative overcorrection from their pre-arthritic alignment following medial UKA demonstrated improved mid-term outcomes and survivorship compared to knees with relative under correction from their pre-arthritic alignment. These results encourage restoring or relatively overcorrecting pre-arthritic alignment to optimize outcomes following medial UKA, and caution against under correction from the pre-arthritic alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation under valgus stress force radiography is useful for evaluating postoperative coronal tibiofemoral subluxation in mobile-bearing UKA

PURPOSE

Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation (CTFS) is considered a controversial and potential contraindication to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) but is less discussed. The study aims to observe the CTFS in a cohort of patients before and after mobile-bearing UKA and to investigate the relationship between preoperative variables (preoperative CTFS and preoperative CTFS under valgus stress) and postoperative CTFS after mobile-bearing UKA.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed 181 patients (224 knees) undergoing mobile-bearing UKA from September 1 2019 to December 31 2021. By using hip-to-ankle anterior-posterior (AP) standing radiographs and valgus stress force radiographs, preoperative CTFS, preoperative CTFS under valgus stress, and postoperative CTFS were measured. CTFS was defined as the distance between the tangent line to the outermost joint edge of the lateral condyle of the femur and the tangent line of the lateral tibial plateau. All patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative CTFS, group A (postoperative CTFS ≤ 5 mm) and group B (postoperative CTFS > 5 mm). The Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA together with Tukey's post hoc test, the chi-square test, the Fisher's exact test, Pearson correlation analysis, simple and multiple linear regression, and univariate and multiple logistic regression were used in the analyses.

RESULTS

The means ± standard deviations (SD) of preoperative CTFS, preoperative CTFS under valgus stress, and postoperative CTFS were 4.96 ± 1.82 mm, 3.06 ± 1.37 mm, and 3.19 ± 1.27 mm. The difference between preoperative CTFS and postoperative CTFS was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The preoperative CTFS (6.35 ± 1.34 mm) in Group B (n = 22) was significantly higher than that (4.81 ± 1.82 mm) in Group A (n = 202) (p < 0.001), so was the variable-preoperative CTFS under valgus stress (5.41 ± 1.00 mm (Group B) > 2.80 ± 1.14 mm (Group A), p < 0.001). In Pearson correlation analysis, there was a correlation between preoperative CTFS and postoperative CTFS (r = 0.493, p < 0.001), while the correlation between preoperative CTFS under valgus stress and postoperative CTFS was stronger (r = 0.842, p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, preoperative CTFS under valgus stress (β = 0.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.714-0.883, p < 0.001) was significantly correlated with postoperative CTFS. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative CTFS under valgus stress (OR = 12.412, 95% CI = 4.757-32.384, and p < 0.001) was expressed as the risk factor of postoperative CTFS (> 5 mm).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CTFS can be improved significantly after mobile-bearing UKA. In addition, postoperative CTFS is correlated with preoperative CTFS under valgus stress and a higher preoperative CTFS under valgus stress will increase the risk of higher postoperative CTFS (> 5 mm).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores estimated pre-arthritic coronal limb alignment: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims to restore pre-arthritic (constitutional) limb alignment, by re-tensioning of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). This study aimed to determine whether pre-arthritic coronal alignment was restored following robotic-assisted medial UKA in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.

METHOD

A retrospective study was undertaken, including 102 patients with a unilateral robotic-assisted medial UKA and a contralateral unaffected knee. Both the validated arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and alignment of the contralateral unaffected knee were used to estimate pre-arthritic alignment. The aHKA is a radiographic method to estimate the pre-arthritic mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA). To verify restoration of pre-arthritic alignment, postoperative mHKA was compared to the aHKA. Additionally, postoperative mHKA, joint line congruence (JLCA), and knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) angles were compared between the operative and contralateral unaffected knee. Equivalence between postoperative and pre-arthritic alignment was assessed through the two-one-sided t-test (TOST), using equivalence margins of ±2.0°.

RESULTS

Postoperative mHKA was equivalent to the aHKA (mean difference -0.38°, 90% CI -0.69 to -0.07;p < .001), with 93 knees (91%) restored within 3.0° their aHKA. Postoperative mHKA, JLCA and KJLO were equivalent between the operative and contralateral unaffected knees, with mean differences of -0.65°, -0.65°, and -0.40°, respectively; all p < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative and pre-arthritic coronal alignment were equivalent following robotic-assisted medial UKA, with 91% of knees restored within 3.0° of their pre-arthritic mechanical axis. These results demonstrate that both mechanical alignment and joint line congruence are restored by MCL re-tensioning in patients undergoing robotic-assisted medial UKA for medial compartment osteoarthritis.

Preoperative uncorrectable tibiofemoral subluxation can worsen clinical outcomes after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

The presence of tibiofemoral subluxation (TFS) in patients with unicompartmental arthritis, a potential contraindication to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), remains controversial and is not commonly discussed. This study aimed to determine the predictability of postoperative TFS before surgery and the effect of TFS on clinical outcomes after fixed-bearing UKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 70 patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the knee who underwent fixed-bearing UKA from January 2015 to January 2017 were included. The preoperative TFS was assessed using plain anteroposterior and valgus stress radiographs. The patients were classified into three groups as follows: group A (acceptable TFS, n = 36) comprising patients with preoperative TFS less than 5.0 mm; group C (correctable TFS, n = 17) comprising patients with preoperative TFS of more than 5.0 mm but corrected to less than 5.0 mm under valgus stress; and group U (uncorrectable TFS, n = 17) comprising patients with preoperative TFS of more than 5.0 mm under valgus stress. Patient-derived clinical scores were assessed with the 2011 Knee Society Score preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. The results were compared among the three groups using analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Group U showed significantly higher postoperative TFS than groups A and C. Improvements in "symptoms" and "patient satisfaction" scores 2 years after surgery were significantly higher in groups A and C than in group U.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative assessment of TFS under valgus stress could be a predictor of postoperative TFS. Furthermore, preoperative uncorrectable TFS could increase pain and decrease patient satisfaction 2 years after undergoing fixed-bearing UKA.

Lateral osteoarthritis progression is associated with a postoperative residual tibiofemoral subluxation in Oxford UKA

PURPOSE

Lateral compartment osteoarthritis progression (LOP) is a major complication after Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA). This study aimed to identify the association between tibiofemoral subluxation (TFS) and LOP after OUKA. Patients whose TFS was uncorrectable according to preoperative stress radiographs were hypothesised to develop residual TFS even after surgery, and thought to be more likely to develop LOP.

METHODS

The study included 201 patients who underwent medial OUKA. Fifteen patients showed increases in LOP of at least two Kellgren-Lawrence grades after surgery [progression (P) group], while the others had no progression (N group, n = 186). TFS was measured on preoperative full leg weight-bearing radiographs, valgus stress radiographs and postoperative plain radiographs. Valgus stress radiographs were obtained using a firm manual valgus force with the knee flexed at 20°. Leg alignment, Oxford knee score (OKS), and revision rates were assessed.

RESULTS

The P group had significantly higher TFS values on preoperative valgus stress (6.8° ± 2.2° vs. 4.5° ± 2.0°; P < 0.001) and postoperative radiographs (6.6° ± 2.3° vs. 4.6° ± 2.9°; P < 0.001) than the N group. Patients with postoperative residual TFS and postoperative valgus alignment were more likely to have LOP, but 9 of the 15 LOP patients did not show postoperative valgus alignment. The P group had significantly poorer postoperative OKS (33.0 ± 10.2 vs. 37.4 ± 6.5, P = 0.017) and a higher rate of revision (6/15 vs 6/186; odds ratio = 19.16; 95% CI = 4.98-76.05, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

OA progression in the lateral compartment after medial OUKA might be associated with postoperative residual TFS, but does not always coexist with postoperative valgus alignment. Preoperative assessment of TFS with valgus stress could be a potential predictor of postoperative residual TFS and LOP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

No differences in 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with different mediolateral femoral component positions in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There has been a paucity of literature evaluating the role of mediolateral femoral component position (FCP) in medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA). Hence, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the mediolateral FCP in UKA will affect the 10-year clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients who underwent medial UKA.

METHODS

Data of 262 patients who underwent medial UKA were analyzed. All patients were assessed at 6 months, 2 years and 10 years using the Knee Society Function Score, Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, Short-Form 36 Physical/Mental Component Scores and postoperative satisfaction. The mediolateral FCP on postoperative radiographs was measured by independent assessors using the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems. 144 patients were distributed into group C (center), 98 into group M (medial) and 20 into group L (lateral) according to FCP, and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the functional outcomes of the three groups.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found between the three groups in terms of 10-year clinical outcomes, quality of life, satisfaction rates and revision rates.

CONCLUSION

Differences in mediolateral FCP did not result in significant difference in 10-year postoperative clinical outcomes for patients who underwent fixed-bearing medial UKAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, Level III.

Implantation of the Femoral Component Relative to the Tibial Component in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Clinical, Radiological, and Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a procedure with low morbidity and fast recovery. Anatomic implants or robotic-assisted UKA has been proposed to improve outcomes with precise positioning. Femoral component position (FCP) relative to the tibial insert could be a factor influencing the contact stresses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the FCP relative to the tibial insert on clinical outcomes and stress distribution after medial UKA.

METHODS

Sixty-two medial fixed-bearing UKAs were evaluated at a minimum two-year follow-up using the Knee Society Score. Postoperative radiological evaluation performed on frontal X-rays classified the FCP relative to the tibial insert into the following: group M (medial), group C (central), and group L (lateral). A finite element model was developed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the FCP relative to the tibial component.

RESULTS

The postoperative radiological evaluation showed 9 cases in group M, 46 cases in group C, and 7 cases in group L. The maximum knee flexion angle and the 2-year postoperative "symptom" and "patient satisfaction" scores of the Knee Society Score were significantly higher in group C. Compared with central positioning, a shift along the mediolateral axis leads to a displacement of the contact pressure center.

CONCLUSION

The FCP relative to the tibial insert may increase patient outcomes at a minimum follow-up of two years after fixed-bearing medial UKA. Accordance between FCP and contact stresses on the polyethylene insert could be a contributing factor of long-term survival of UKA.

Assessment of radiolucent lines in patients with lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the relationship between these lines and the outcome

PURPOSE

To assess the radiolucent lines (RLLs) around both tibial and femoral components in patients following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the records of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone lateral UKA. The RLLs were assessed with standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs post-operatively. The patient-reported outcome measures included the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and Oxford knee score (OKS). The femoral component position (FCP) and femoral-tibial angle (FTA) were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 198 UKAs that had appropriate radiographs and outcome scores were reviewed with a median follow-up of 33 (range, 12-71) months. The results suggested that 69 cases (34.8%) had RLLs on the standard radiographs. The incidence rates of femoral and tibial physiological RLLs were 11.6% (23/198) and 26% (52/198), respectively, of which 3% (6/198) concerned both components. All RLLs were considered "physiologic lines" that developed within one year after surgery. There were no significant differences among the types of RLLs in any of the outcome measures. No differences in FCP (P = .359) or FTA (P = .111) at the last follow-up were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

It was found that one-third of UKAs had RLLs on radiographs following lateral UKA. All RLLs developed within one year after surgery. As a clinical consequence, the development of RLLs does not affect the short-term outcomes after lateral UKA.

Coronal Alignment of Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component May Affect Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the clinical effects of femoral component coronal alignment in a cohort of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with clinical and radiological follow-up of 10 years.

METHODS

Prospectively collected registry data of 264 consecutive, cemented, primary fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties performed at a single institution from 2004 to 2007 were reviewed. Femoral component coronal angle (FCCA), tibial component coronal angle, and hip-knee-ankle angle were measured on postoperative radiographs. Patients were grouped into acceptable (AG ≤ 3°) and outlier (OG > 3°) groups according to absolute FCCA. Clinical assessment at 6-month, 2-year, and 10-year follow-up was performed using Knee Society Knee and Function Scores, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Short Form-36. Fulfillment of expectations, satisfaction, and implant survivorship was recorded.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographics, tibial component coronal angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, and sagittal parameters in both groups. The OG had poorer OKS at 10 years and a larger deterioration from 2 to 10 years compared to AG (P = .02). Increase in FCCA was associated with deterioration in 2-year OKS (adjusted ß = 0.23, P = .01), 10-year OKS (adjusted ß = 0.26, P = .03), and 2-year Short Form-36 physical component score (adjusted ß = -0.44, P = .01). Expectation fulfillment at 2 years was lower in the OG vs the AG (88% vs 100%, P = .03). Both groups had similar 10-year survivorship (99% vs 98%, P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS

FCCA may affect long-term clinical outcomes, but not short-term clinical outcomes nor 10-year survivorship. Given similar limb alignment, coronal and sagittal component positioning, a larger FCCA was associated with poorer outcomes at 10-year follow-up.