Concomitant Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture: Diagnostic Utility of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers

Unexpected Positive Cultures in Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures noted at the time of revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Moreover, we evaluated whether this finding should be considered clinically significant and what type of treatment, if any, was required.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of 270 patients undergoing surgery for PPFs from December 2010 to December 2021. Exclusion criteria included: open fractures; history of infection at fractured joint; non-operatively treated patients; and intraoperative fractures. The primary end point was the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures noted at the time of revision surgery. This was defined as one or more positive cultures in a PPF that the surgeon had preoperatively classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. Data collection included patient demographics, medical histories, preoperative investigations, postoperative microbiology, and treatment.

RESULTS

During the study period, 159 patients were admitted with PPFs of the hip and 61 with PPFs of the knee. The mean age was 70 years (range, 32 to 93 years). Unexpected positive cultures were diagnosed postoperatively in 15 patients (6.8%; 10 hips, 5 knees). The most prevalent organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.0%). Of those 15 patients, 6 required a surgical revision for infection. None of the patient-related risk factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of unexpected positive cultures. The comparison between infected and noninfected patients showed a significant association between preoperative C-reactive protein >10 mg/mL (P = .04), loose implant (P = .07), and infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures was 6.8% in our study cohort. Although surgical treatment may be required, the majority of patients seem to require no treatment. Larger series are required to investigate the clinical importance of this rare finding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Outcomes after débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for prosthetic joint infection in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty usually have excellent long-term outcomes. However, a subset of patients is diagnosed with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) requiring revision procedures and prolonged recovery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder PJI in patients undergoing débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, and 2-stage revision. We also sought to compare outcomes and complications across procedures.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients diagnosed with PJI after primary shoulder arthroplasty between January 2010 and August 2021. Patients were included if they underwent treatment with DAIR, single-stage revision, or 2-stage revision. Demographic information, surgical details, complications, laboratory data, postoperative antibiotic regimen, and infectious pathogen were collected. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were collected: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Scale, and PROMIS Upper Extremity. Chi-square, t test, and 1-way analysis of variance were used as appropriate to evaluate each factor.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the study, 26% treated with DAIR, 9% treated with single-stage revision, and 65% treated with 2-stage revision. There were no significant differences in patient comorbidities. Patients undergoing DAIR were diagnosed significantly earlier than those undergoing single- and 2-stage revision procedures (12.6 ± 22.9 months vs. 49.6 ± 48.4 vs. 25.0 ± 26.6, P = .010). Recurrent PJI was noted in 23.1% of patients: 29.4% of DAIR patients, no single-stage patients, and 23.8% of 2-stage patients (P = .330). Patients undergoing 2-stage revision with treatment failure had a significantly higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (0.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.7 ± 3.9, P = .027). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes across groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing treatment of shoulder PJI with DAIR did not have an increased rate of reinfection compared with single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. Patients treated with DAIR were diagnosed with PJI significantly earlier than those undergoing single-stage and 2-stage revision procedures. There was no difference in complication rates between groups. This information adds to the body of work detailing outcomes after DAIR for shoulder PJI and provides encouraging data for use in this patient population. Future studies with a larger sample size may be conducted to further investigate specific pathogens, infection timelines, and antibiotic regimens that reduce the risk of treatment failure.

Detection of synovial fluid LTF and S100A8 by chemiluminescence immunoassay for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Synovial fluid lactoferrin (LTF) and S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100A8) have been considered as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) through our previous research. However, the detection methods of these two proteins are still immature, so a rapid, accurate and cost-effective testing method is warranted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA) for the automated detection of synovial fluid LTF and S100A8 and assessed the analytical performance for these two methods. In addition, we recruited 86 patients who were suspected of PJI after total joint replacement (TJA) and examined their synovial fluid using CLIA to explore the clinical application value of these methods and the diagnostic efficiency of synovial fluid LTF and S100A8 for PJI.

RESULTS

Our established CLIA methods have a wide linear range of 20-10000 ng/mL for LTF detection system and 5-5000 ng/mL for S100A8 detection system. Performance parameters such as precision, specificity, and recovery rate can meet the industry standards. Then, the established methods were used to detect LTF and S100A8 in synovial fluid samples, which showed excellent diagnostic efficiency for PJI, and the areas under ROC curve (AUC) were 0.954 (95% CI: 0.909-0.999) and 0.958 (95% CI: 0.918-0.997), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our established CLIA methods have the advantages of automation, high throughput, low price, and is expected to be widely popularized in clinical applications. Synovial fluid LTF and S100A8 detected through CLIA had efficient diagnostic potentiality for predicting and diagnosing PJI.

Profiling the Immune Response to Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Non-Infectious Arthroplasty Failure

Arthroplasty failure is a major complication of joint replacement surgery. It can be caused by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or non-infectious etiologies, and often requires surgical intervention and (in select scenarios) resection and reimplantation of implanted devices. Fast and accurate diagnosis of PJI and non-infectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF) is critical to direct medical and surgical treatment; differentiation of PJI from NIAF may, however, be unclear in some cases. Traditional culture, nucleic acid amplification tests, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic techniques for microbial detection have had success in differentiating the two entities, although microbiologically negative apparent PJI remains a challenge. Single host biomarkers or, alternatively, more advanced immune response profiling-based approaches may be applied to differentiate PJI from NIAF, overcoming limitations of microbial-based detection methods and possibly, especially with newer approaches, augmenting them. In this review, current approaches to arthroplasty failure diagnosis are briefly overviewed, followed by a review of host-based approaches for differentiation of PJI from NIAF, including exciting futuristic combinational multi-omics methodologies that may both detect pathogens and assess biological responses, illuminating causes of arthroplasty failure.

Increased Risk of Hospital Readmissions and Implant-Related Complications in Patients Who Had a Recent History of Fragility Fracture: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

With the increasing utilization of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a continually aging US population, the number of patients who have low bone mineral density who undergo TKA may concomitantly increase. This study aimed to assess the rates of short-term complications following TKA in patients who did and did not have a recent history of a prior fragility fracture.

METHODS

A matched retrospective cohort study analyzing 48,796 patients was performed using a national database to determine the impact of a preceding fragility fracture on rates of short-term complications following TKA. The rates of complications at 1 and 2 years post-TKA were analyzed using multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Prior fragility fracture was associated with increased rates of 1-year hospital readmissions (hazard ratio = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.22-1.38), periprosthetic fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72, 95% CI, 1.89-3.99), non-infection-related revisions (OR = 1.32, 95% CI, 1.09-1.60), secondary fragility fractures (OR = 4.62, 95% CI, 4.19-5.12), prosthesis dislocations (OR = 1.76, 95% CI, 1.22-2.56), prosthesis instabilities (OR = 1.64, 95% CI, 1.25-2.15), and periprosthetic infections (OR = 1.49, 95% CI, 1.29-1.71), with similar trends in implant-related complications also seen at the 2-year mark. Patients who filled a prescription for osteoporosis pharmacotherapy had clinically similar rates of these complications compared to those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Sustaining a fragility fracture prior to TKA is associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission and significant implant-related postoperative complications, potentially increasing the morbidity and mortality of TKA in these patients.

Utility of synovial calprotectin lateral flow test to exclude chronic prosthetic joint infection in periprosthetic fractures: a prospective cohort study

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires a combination of various clinical, laboratory, microbiological and histopathological parameters. A concomitant periprosthetic fracture (PPF) further complicates the diagnosis as it causes a confounding local inflammatory response. Synovial calprotectin has been demonstrated as a promising biomarker of PJI. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of synovial calprotectin for the pre- or intraoperative diagnosis of PJI in PFF. 30 patients with PPF and implant loosening were included in this prospective study. Synovial fluid with white blood cells and percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, serum C-reactive protein, and synovial calprotectin using a lateral-flow assay were tested against the EBJIS definition with adjusted thresholds to account for the local inflammation. 14 patients were postoperatively classified as confirmed infections (ten total hip arthroplasties and fourtotal knee arthroplasties). The calprotectin assay yielded a sensitivity of 0.71 [0.48; 0.95], a specificity of 0.69 [0.46; 0.91], a positive predictive value of 0.67 [0.43; 0.91] and a negative predictive value of 0.73 [0.51; 0.96]. Calprotectin is a promising diagnostic parameter for the detection of a PJI in a PPF. The lateral flow assay offers prompt results, which may further assist the surgeon in addition to already existing parameters of PJI diagnostics to diagnose concomitant PJI in PPF during surgery.

Periprosthetic Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Total Hip Fractures: Evaluation and Management

The incidences of periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty are expected to increase exponentially over the coming decades. Epidemiologic data suggest that many periprosthetic fractures after THA occur concurrently with a loose femoral implant. Recent studies suggest an approximately 8% incidence of indolent infection in cases of suspected aseptic loosening. The available data, therefore, suggest that periprosthetic fracture and infection may coexist, and this possibility should be considered, particularly in patients with a loose femoral stem and high pretest possibility. Although currently limited, the available literature provides some guidance as how to manage this complex issue.

Combination of Synovial Fluid IL-4 and Polymorphonuclear Cell Percentage Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Background

Synovial fluid biomarkers have been found to improve the diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI); however, no “gold standard” exists yet. Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and polymorphonuclear cell (neutrophil) count in the synovial fluid are crucial in mediating local inflammation during bacterial infections and could be valuable biomarkers for PJI.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted to investigate the diagnostic potential of synovial fluid IL-4 (SF-IL4) and polymorphonuclear cell percentage (SF-PMN%) for chronic PJI. A total of 110 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty between January 2019 and October 2020 were enrolled, and 11 patients were excluded. Of 99 patients, 43 were classified as having PJI and 56 as having aseptic failures according to the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infections Society criteria. In all patients, SF-IL4, SF-PMN%, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were quantified preoperatively. The diagnostic value for each biomarker was analyzed, and optimal cutoff values were calculated.

Results

The patient demographics did not significantly vary. The area under the curve of SF-IL4 and SF-PMN% was 0.97 and 0.89, respectively, higher than that for serum ESR (0.72) and serum CRP (0.83). The combination of SF-IL4 and SF-PMN% provided higher specificity (97.0%) and accuracy (96.0%) when the cut-off values were 1.7 pg/mL and 75%, respectively.

Conclusion

SF-IL4 is a valuable biomarker for chronic PJI detection, and the combination of SF-IL4 and SF-PMN% improved the diagnostic value of chronic PJI, and further studies are needed until its clinical application.

Predicting the Exception-CRP and Primary Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While primary hip arthroplasty is the most common operative procedure in orthopedic surgery, a periprosthetic joint infection is its most severe complication. Early detection and prediction are crucial. In this study, we aimed to determine the value of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and develop a formula to predict this rare, but devastating complication.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 708 patients with primary hip arthroplasty. CRP, white blood cell count (WBC), and several patient characteristics were assessed for 20 days following the operative procedure.

RESULTS

Eight patients suffered an early acute periprosthetic infection. The maximum CRP predicted an infection with a sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 56.9%, respectively, while a binary logistic regression reached values of 75% and 80%. A multinominal logistic regression, however, was able to predict an early infection with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 78.9%. With a one-phase decay, 71.6% of the postoperative CRP-variance could be predicted.

CONCLUSION

To predict early acute periprosthetic joint infection after primary hip arthroplasty, a multinominal logistic regression is the most promising approach. Including five parameters, an early infection can be predicted on day 5 after the operative procedure with 87.5% sensitivity, while it can be excluded with 78.9% specificity.

Comparison of patient reported outcome measures after single versus two-stage revision for chronic infection of total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Two-stage revision is the current gold standard treatment for infected total hip arthroplasties (THA) with good clinical outcomes. Single-stage revision THA offers the advantage of only a single surgical intervention, potentially leading to improved functional outcomes. This study aimed to compare the differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications between single and two-stage revision THA for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

A total of 159 consecutive revision THA patients for chronic PJI with complete pre-and post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) was investigated. A total of 46 patients with single-stage revision THA was matched to 92 patients following two-stage revision THA using propensity score matching, yielding a total of 136 propensity score-matched patients for analysis.

RESULTS

Single and two-stage revision THA improved PROM scores post-operatively, with significantly higher PROMs for single-stage revision THA (HOOS-PS: 50.7 vs 46.4, p = 0.04; Physical SF 10A: 42.1 vs 36.6, p < 0.001; PROMIS SF Physical: 41.4 vs 37.4, p < 0.001; PROMIS SF Mental: 52.8 vs 47.6, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between both cohorts for reinfection rates (p = 0.81) and 90-day mortality rates (p = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

This study found a demonstrable functional benefit of single-stage revision compared to two-stage revision for THA with chronic periprosthetic joint infection, suggesting that single-stage revision THA may provide an effective alternative to two-stage revision in selected patients with chronic PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control retrospective analysis.

Periprosthetic Infections of the Shoulder Joint: Characteristics and 5-Year Outcome of a Single-Center Series of 19 Cases

Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a devastating complication after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Furthermore, there is a paucity in the literature regarding its diagnostic and therapeutic management, especially the absence of therapy concepts devised exclusively for PSI. The aim of the presenting study is to examine the characteristics and outcome of patients with PSI who were treated according to well-established algorithms developed originally for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee and determine if these algorithms can be applied to PSI. This single-center case series included all patients with a PSI presenting between 2010 and 2020. Recorded parameters included age, sex, affected side, BMI, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative anticoagulation, indication for TSA (fracture, osteoarthritis or cuff-arthropathy), and type of infection (acute or chronic PSI). The outcome was divided into treatment failure or infect resolution. Staphylococcus epidermidis and aureus were the commonest infecting pathogens. Acute PSI was mainly treated with debridement, irrigation, and retention of the prosthesis (DAIR) and chronic cases with two/multiple-stage exchange. The treatment failure rate was 10.5%. C-reactive protein was preoperatively elevated in 68.4% of cases. The mean number of operative revisions was 3.6 ± 2.6, and the mean total duration of antibiotic treatment was 72.4 ± 41.4 days. The most administered antibiotic was a combination of clindamycin and fluoroquinolone. In summary, the data of the current study suggest that therapeutical algorithms and recommendations developed for the treatment of PJI of the hip and knee are also applicable to PSI.