Effects of Posterior Tibial Slope on a Posterior Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics and Kinetics

Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on Knee Kinematics After Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), normal knee kinematics are rarely replicated. Retention of both cruciate ligaments (bicruciate retaining TKA) has helped this. Postoperative posterior tibial slope (PPTS) may further affect ligament tension and kinematics. The objective of this study is to determine how changes between the preoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) and PPTS affect knee kinematics.

Methods

Twenty bicruciate retaining TKAs were performed using standard instrumentation. Fluoroscopic kinematic data were obtained during gait and a single knee bend. Differences (Δ) between radiographic measurements of preoperative and PPTS were correlated with in-vivo knee kinematics. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their Δ values. Group I consisted of Δ values less than 0.7, indicating either a similar PPTS compared to preoperative PTS or a slightly flatter PPTS. Group II consisted of Δ values above 0.7, indicating a steepened PPTS.

Results

Preoperative PTS values ranged from -0.5° to 11.2°, with an average of 5.0° ± 3.4°. PPTS values ranged from 3.0° to 12.1°, with an average of 7.1° ± 3.1°. Weight-bearing range of motion (WBROM) measured from 94° to 139°, and femorotibial axial rotation ranged from -2.9° to 17.3°. A t-test revealed average values for WBROM in Group IT (Δ < 0.7) to be significantly greater than those for Group IIT (Δ > 0.7) (P = .01).

Conclusions

These findings indicate that either a PPTS approximating the preoperative PTS or a slightly flattened PPTS in comparison (Δ < 0.7) is associated with WBROM greater than 130°. Values for axial rotation and anterior sliding were not significantly associated with changes to the PTS.

Increase in the Posterior Tibial Slope Provides Better Joint Awareness and Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

The effect of the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate (1) the effect of alteration of the PTS on clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction and joint awareness, and (2) the relationship between the patient-reported outcomes, the PTS, and compartment loading. Based on the alteration of the PTS after CR-TKA, 39 and 16 patients were stratified into increased and decreased PTS groups, respectively. Clinical evaluation was performed by the Knee Society Score (KSS) 2011 and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Compartment loading was intraoperatively assessed. KSS 2011 (symptoms, satisfaction, and total score) was significantly higher (p = 0.018, 0.023, and 0.040, respectively), and FJS ("climbing stairs?") was significantly lower (p = 0.025) in the increased PTS group compared with the decreased PTS group. The decrease in both medial and lateral compartment loading of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull was significantly greater in the increased PTS group than in the decreased PTS group (p< 0.01 for both comparisons). Medial compartment loading of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull significantly correlated with KSS 2011 for "symptom" (r = - 0.4042, -0.4164, and -0.4010, respectively; p = 0.0267, 0.0246, and 0.0311, respectively). ΔPTS significantly correlated with medial compartment loading differentials of Δ45°, Δ90°, and ΔFull (r = - 0.3288, -0.3792, and -0.4424, respectively; p = 0.0358, 0.01558, and 0.0043, respectively). Patients with increased PTS showed better symptoms and higher patient satisfaction compared with those with decreased PTS following CR-TKA, possibly due to a greater decrease in compartment loading during knee flexion.Level of evidence:level IV, therapeutic case series.

Exploration of the Advanced VIVOTM Joint Simulator: An In-Depth Analysis of Opportunities and Limitations Demonstrated by the Artificial Knee Joint

In biomechanical research, advanced joint simulators such as VIVOTM offer the ability to test artificial joints under realistic kinematics and load conditions. Furthermore, it promises to simplify testing with advanced control approaches and the ability to include virtual ligaments. However, the overall functionality concerning specific test setup conditions, such as the joint lubrication or control algorithm, has not been investigated in-depth so far. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the basic functionality of the VIVOTM joint simulator with six degrees of freedom in order to highlight its capabilities and limitations when testing a total knee endoprostheses using a passive flexion-extension movement. For this, different test setup conditions were investigated, e.g., the control method, repeatability and kinematic reproducibility, waveform frequency, lubrication, and implant embedding. The features offered by the VIVOTM joint simulator are useful for testing joint endoprostheses under realistic loading scenarios. It was found that the results were highly influenced by the varying test setup conditions, although the same mechanical load case was analysed. This study highlights the difficulties encountered when using six degrees of freedom joint simulators, contributes to their understanding, and supports users of advanced joint simulators through functional and tribological analysis of joint endoprostheses.

Extra-articular location of the three-dimensional mechanical axis in advanced knee osteoarthritis: an upright computed tomography study

PURPOSE

One of the most widely used benchmarks of lower-limb alignment is the mechanical axis (MA), which passes through the centers of the femoral head and the ankle in the weight-bearing position. However, where the MA passes through three-dimensionally (3D) is unclear. We investigated the MA in 3D (3D-MA) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) using upright computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 66 varus OA knees from 38 patients [age 70.0 (64.8-77.0) years; median (interquartile range)]. The 3D-MA was determined using upright CT data and compared among Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades. Further, correlations between the 3D-MA and other parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 3D-MA was located at 5.3 (1.3-14.4)% medially and 7.1 (0.7-15.3)% posteriorly on the tibial plateau in KL-1, and was translated medioposteriorly with increased KL grade. The 3D-MA in KL-3 [30.6 (22.6-42.6)% medially and 50.9 (45.8-80.2)% posteriorly] and KL-4 [56.7 (48.5-62.9)% medially and 92.3 (50.2-127.1)% posteriorly] was located extra-articularly. The mediolateral position of the 3D-MA correlated with the femorotibial angle [correlation coefficient (CC) = - 0.85, p < 0.001], and the anteroposterior position of the 3D-MA correlated with the knee flexion angle (CC = - 0.93, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrated that the 3D-MA in low-grade OA knees passes slightly medial and posterior to the knee center, and the 3D-MA is translated medioposteriorly with the progression of knee OA. Further, the 3D-MA is translated medially with varus progression and posteriorly with the progression of knee flexion contracture.

How to Choose the Appropriate Posterior Slope Angle Can Lead to Good Knee Joint Function Recovery in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Objective

In this study, we aim to examine the effects of osteotomy under varying posterior slope angles on knee joint function recovery following knee arthroplasty.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis from September 2015 to September 2018 on 240 patients who underwent knee arthroplasty three years previously. The study participants were categorized based on changes in the angle of the posterior slope before and after surgery: Group 1, > 5°; Group 2, 3°-5°; Group 3, 0°-3°; Group 4, -3°-0°; Group 5, < -3°. All participants were affected with knee osteoarthritis. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS) knee function score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) knee function score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were measured 3 years after surgery.

Results

The level of pain experienced by the patients decreased significantly than before, with pain scores ranging from 1.0-3.0, and there was a statistical difference between groups (H = 93.400, P < 0.001). The KSS score increased, with group 5 having the lowest median score of 78.0 and group 2 having the highest median score of 97.0, and there was a statistical difference between groups (H = 164.460, P < 0.001). The WOMAC score was reduced, with the median score being 24.0, 11.0, 14.0, 20.0, and 26.0, in the five groups, respectively. Group 5 had the highest score, while Group 2 had the lowest score, and there was a statistically significant difference between groups (H = 164.223, P < 0.001). No symptoms such as periprosthetic femoral fracture, prosthetic loosening, or pad wear were detected in patients postoperatively.

Conclusion

Osteotomy at various posterior slope angles in total knee arthroplasty impacts postoperative knee function rehabilitation. An excessive increase or decrease in angle can have an impact on the postoperative recovery of knee function.

Learning curve of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its effects on implant position in asian patients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (r-TKA) can reportedly achieve more accurate implant positioning than conventional total knee arthroplasty (c-TKA), although its learning curve is controversial. Moreover, few studies have investigated r-TKA in Asians, who have different anatomical characteristics. This study aimed to determine the learning curve for r-TKA and compare implant positions between r-TKA and c-TKA according to the learning curve in Asian patients.

METHODS

This prospective study included 50 consecutive c-TKAs (group C), followed by 50 consecutive r-TKAs conducted using the MAKO robotic system (Stryker, USA). Cumulative summation analyses were performed to assess the learning curve for operative time in r-TKA. Accordingly, the r-TKA cases were divided into the initial (group I) and proficiency cases (group P). The femoral and tibial component positions in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes and lower limb alignment were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

r-TKA was associated with a learning curve for operative time in 18 cases. The operative time was significantly shorter in groups C and P than that in group I, with no significant difference between groups C and P. Groups I and P demonstrated fewer outliers with respect to lower limb alignment, femoral component coronal position, axial position, and tibial component sagittal position than those in group C, with no significant difference between groups I and P.

CONCLUSION

The operative time did not differ significantly between r-TKA and c-TKA after the learning curve. Surgeons could expect more accurate and reproducible lower limb alignment and implant positioning with r-TKA in Asian patients, irrespective of the learning curve.

Patella height influences patellofemoral contact and kinematics following cruciate-retaining total knee replacement

The role of patella height is discussed controversially in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, this computational study aims to systematically analyze the biomechanical effect of different patella heights on patellofemoral (PF) forces and kinematics after cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. We implemented a CR bicondylar TKA with a dome patellar button in a validated dynamic musculoskeletal multibody model of a male human knee joint. Retropatellar dynamics (contact force [N], shear force [N], patellar shift [mm], tilt [°], and rotation [°]) were evaluated during dual-limb squat motion (flexion from 0° to 90°) with simulated active muscle forces and the effects of different patella heights (Blackburne-Peel [BP] ratio of 0.39, 0.49, 0.65, 0.85, 1.01, and 1.1 were systematically examined). As active knee flexion increased, PF contact force also increased. Patella alta (BP = 1.1) resulted in higher PF contact forces compared to normal patella height (BP = 0.65) by up to 16%. Contrarily, patella baja was associated with decreased PF forces by 7%. Compared to patella baja (BP = 0.39), patella alta (BP = 1.1) considerably increased the contact force by up to 25%. Different patellar heights mainly affected PF shear forces during early knee flexion. Concerning PF kinematics, patella alta (BP = 1.1) yielded a greater lateral tilt of more than 4° and higher patellar rotation by up to 3° during deep knee flexion, compared to normal patella height (BP = 0.65). Our computational study indicates that patella alta is associated with the highest PF contact and shear force after the implantation of a CR bicondylar TKA. This should be considered in PF disorders following TKA.

Posterior Tibial Slope in Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Transmalleolar Sagittal Axis Underestimates Slope Compared to Traditional Intramedullary Axis

BACKGROUND

Tibial slope in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) impacts knee flexion, balance, and ligament strain. Implants were initially designed with tibial slope recommendations based on the intramedullary axis. However, technology-assisted TKA, such as robotics or navigation, determines slope from the ankle-knee axis connecting the center of the transmalleolar line to the proximal exit point of the tibial shaft axis. We sought to quantify the difference in tibial slope between the traditional intramedullary and transmalleolar sagittal tibial axes.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 40 TKAs with preoperative computed tomography scans. We reconstructed the 3-dimensional geometry of the tibia and fibula and determined the intramedullary axis as the best fit cylinder to the tibial shaft. We defined the transmalleolar axis according to accepted industry standards. We measured the angular difference between both axes in the sagittal plane.

RESULTS

The transmalleolar axis was radiographically posterior to the intramedullary axis in 39 knees. Utilizing the transmalleolar axis to set posterior tibial slope would reduce the posterior tibial slope by a mean of 1.9° ± 1.3° compared to the intramedullary axis. Furthermore, the posterior slope would be reduced between 0° and 2° in 24 knees (60%), between 2° and 4° in 10 knees (25%), and more than 4° in 5 knees (13%).

CONCLUSION

Tibial components implanted with technology assistance referencing the transmalleolar axis to set posterior slope will show an average of 1.9° less posterior slope when measured in sagittal plain radiographs, potentially concerning for knee kinematics.