Preoperative Mental Health Influences Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Satisfaction After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Capability After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Is Strongly Associated With Preoperative Symptoms of Depression

BACKGROUND

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to improve the level of capability (ability to perform valued life activities) associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, some evidence suggests a substantial proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with their outcomes after this procedure. We sought to better understand the association between mental health, specifically symptoms of depression, with postoperative outcomes. Symptoms of depression are shown to be common among orthopaedic populations in general and can be briefly and conveniently evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) in a less burdensome manner compared with longer mental health surveys. This study assesses the association between preoperative depressive symptoms (PHQ-2) and levels of capability at 6 weeks and 6 months after TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 114 patients with knee OA across five clinics in California and Texas scheduled for TKA. Participants completed a preoperative PHQ-2 and Knee Injury and OA Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) survey at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. We analyzed these data using bivariate and multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Preoperative PHQ-2 scores were significantly associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks and 6 months post-TKA. Latino/Hispanic race was also associated with lower KOOS JR scores at 6 weeks. The association between preoperative depressive symptoms and level of capability after TKA were more pronounced at 6 months compared with 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative symptoms of depression are strongly associated with reduced capability after TKA and can be screened for using the PHQ-2-a brief tool that can be feasibly incorporated into clinical workflows. User-friendly assessment of depressive symptoms can assist orthopaedic surgeons in identifying and addressing mental health at the outset during the management of knee OA.

Positive Changes in Safety Perception Among Blacks with HIV and Comorbidities: Assessment of Social Determinants of Health During COVID-19

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on social determinants of health (SDOH) among Blacks with HIV and a comorbid diagnosis of hypertension or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

This was a longitudinal survey study. The inclusion criteria were adults ≥ 18 years and the presence of hypertension and/or diabetes, along with a positive HIV diagnosis. This study enrolled patients in the HIV clinics and chain specialty pharmacies in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) area. A survey of ten questions examining SDOH was conducted before, during, and after the lockdown. A proportional odds mixed effects logistic regression model was applied to assess differences between time points.

RESULTS

A total of 27 participants were included. Respondents felt significantly safer in their living place post-lockdown than in the pre-lockdown period (odds ratio = 6.39, 95% CI [1.08-37.73]). No other statistically significant differences in the responses were found over the study timeframe. However, borderline p values indicated better SDOH status post-lockdown as compared to pre-lockdown.

CONCLUSION

Study participants feel safer one year after lockdown compared to pre-lockdown. The CARES Act and the moratorium on rent and mortgage are among the factors that may explain this increase. Future research should include designing and evaluating interventions for social equity enhancement.

Mental Robustness May Be Associated With Improved Physical Function in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

BACKGROUND

In accordance with the high incidence of bilateral knee osteoarthritis, many patients have undergone bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Whether patients undergo bilateral procedures in a staged or simultaneous fashion, the physical and mental burden of undergoing 2 major orthopedic procedures is considerable. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate differences between minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement between staged versus simultaneous BTKA, and (2) identify the patient variables, specifically mental scores, that were associated with MCID achievement in patients undergoing BTKA.

METHODS

Simultaneous and staged BTKA patients within a single health care network from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, surgery details, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Forms 10a (PROMIS PF10a), PROMIS Mental scores, and Knee Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures were collected before the first total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and after the second TKA, respectively, in staged BTKA patients. The final cohort consisted of 249 patients, with an average age of 66 years (range, 21 to 87), 63% women, and an average body mass index of 32 (range, 20 to 52), at a mean follow-up of 1.1 years (range, 0.5 to 2.4). Multivariate regressions were performed on MCID PF10a and KOOS achievement, as well as whether the BTKA was performed simultaneously versus staged.

RESULTS

A preoperative PROMIS Mental score in the upper 2 quartiles was associated with MCID PF10a achievement in BTKA. Men and surgeries performed at an Academic Medical Center were negatively associated with the achievement of MCID KOOS. Interestingly, those who underwent simultaneous BTKA were less likely to achieve MCID KOOS than those who underwent a staged BTKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative mental robustness may be positively associated with improved physical function outcome in BTKA patients.

Mental Health Effects on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The effect of mental health on patient-reported outcome measures is not fully understood in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Thus, we investigated the relationship between mental health diagnoses (MHDs) and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in primary TJA and revision TJA (rTJA).

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected using relevant Current Procedural Terminology and MHDs International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes with completed Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function Short Form 10a, PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires. Logistic regressions and statistical analyses were used to determine the effect of a MHD on MCID-I/MCID-W rates.

RESULTS

Data included 4,562 patients (4,190 primary TJAs/372 rTJAs). In primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA), MHD-affected outcomes for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (MCID-I: 81% versus 86%, P = 0.007; MCID-W: 6.0% versus 3.2%, P = 0.008), Physical Function Short Form 10a (MCID-I: 68% versus 77%, P < 0.001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 38% versus 44%, P = 0.009), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 61% versus 73%, P < 0.001; MCID-W: 14% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001) versus pTHA patients without MHD. A MHD led to lower rates of MCID-I for PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 56% versus 63%, P = 0.003) in primary total knee arthroplasty patients. No effects from a MHD were observed in rTJA patients.

DISCUSSION

The presence of a MHD had a prominent negative influence on pTHA patients. Patients who underwent rTJA had lower MCID-I rates, higher MCID-W rates, and lower patient-reported outcome measure scores despite less influence from a MHD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes after Operatively Treated Tibial Plateau Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Define patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds and factors affecting PASS thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Single Level I academic trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

All patients (n = 159) who underwent fixation of a tibial plateau fracture from 2016 to 2021 and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at minimum 1-year follow-up were enrolled for the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

PASS thresholds for global outcome (PASS-Global), pain (PASS-Pain), and function (PASS-Function) were determined using anchor-based questions such as "How satisfied are you today with your injured lower extremity?" with answer choices of very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisfied, and very unsatisfied. PASS thresholds for each PROM were calculated using 3 methods: (1) 80% specificity, (2) 75th percentile, and (3) Youden Index.

RESULTS

Sixty percent of patients were satisfied with their global outcome and 53% with function. Using 80% specificity, 75th percentile, and Youden Index, PASS-Global thresholds were 48.5, 44.5, and 47.9 for PROMIS-PF and 56.3, 56.2, and 56.3 for KOOS-QOL, respectively. PASS-Pain threshold for KOOS-Pain was 84.4, 80.6, and 80.6, respectively. PASS-Function thresholds were 48.9, 46.8, and 48 for PROMIS-PF and 94.1, 90.2, and 86.8 for KOOS-ADL, respectively. Younger patients and those with bicondylar fractures or infections were associated with significantly lower PASS-Pain thresholds. Schatzker II fractures, lateral column involvement, or isolated lateral approach resulted in significantly higher PASS-Global and PASS-Function thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defines global, functional, and pain PASS thresholds for tibial plateau fractures. Patients with bicondylar fractures, infections, and medial column involvement were more often unsatisfied. These thresholds are valuable references to identify patients who have attained satisfactory outcomes and to counsel patients with risk factors for unsatisfactory outcomes following tibial plateau fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on the Mode of Failure

Background

Complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that necessitate revision cause considerable psychological distress and symptoms of depression, which are linked to poorer postoperative outcomes, increased complications, and increased healthcare utilization. We aimed to identify the prevalence of mental health disorders and symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA and to stratify these patients based on their mechanism of failure.

Methods

All patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA from 2008 to 2019 with a minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Patients (n = 394) were grouped based on 7 failure modes previously described. Patients were considered to have depressive symptoms if their Veterans RAND-12 mental component score was below 42. Preoperative and postoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental component scores at the latest follow-up were evaluated.

Results

Overall comparative prevalence of preoperative to postoperative depressive symptoms was 23.4%-18.8%. By mode of failure are as follows: arthrofibrosis (25.8%-16.7%), aseptic loosening (25.3%-18.9%), extensor mechanism disruption (25%-50%), failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (8.6%-14.3%), instability (25.7%-17.1%), osteolysis or polyethylene wear (23.1%-23.1%), and patellar failure (11.8%-23.5%). There was no difference in depressive symptoms among failure modes preoperatively (P = .376) or at the latest postoperative follow-up (P = .175).

Conclusions

The prevalence of depressive symptoms in revision TKA patients appears to be independent of failure mode. Surgeon awareness and screening for depressive symptoms in this patient population preoperatively with referral for potential treatment may improve early postoperative outcomes.

Patients Consistently Report Worse Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between primary TKA (pTKA) and revision TKA (rTKA) have not been well-studied. Therefore, we compared pTKA and rTKA patients by the rates of achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W).

METHODS

A total of 2,448 patients (2,239 pTKAs/209 rTKAs) were retrospectively studied. Patients who completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patient-reported outcome measures and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models measured relationships between surgery type and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent rTKA (all causes) had lower rates of improvement and higher rates of worsening compared to pTKA patients for KOOS-PS (MCID-I: 54 versus 68%, P < .001; MCID-W: 18 versus 8.6%, P < .001), PF10a (MCID-I: 44 versus 65%, P < .001; MCID-W: 22 versus 11%, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 34 versus 45%, P = .005), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 51 versus 60%, P = .014; MCID-W: 29 versus 14%, P < .001). Undergoing revision was predictive of worsening postoperatively for KOOS-PS, PF10a, and PROMIS Global-Physical compared to pTKA. Postoperative scores were significantly higher for all 4 PROMs following pTKA.

CONCLUSION

Patients reported significantly less improvement and higher rates of worsening following rTKA, particularly for PROMs that assessed physical function. Although pTKA patients did better overall, the improvement rates may be considered relatively low and should prompt discussions on improving outcomes following pTKA and rTKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

A Scoping Review of Adult Inpatient Satisfaction with Mental Health Services

Patient satisfaction with hospital services has been increasingly discussed as an important indicator of healthcare quality. It has been demonstrated that improving patient satisfaction is associated with better compliance with treatment plans and a decrease in patient complaints regarding doctors' and nurses' misconduct. This scoping review's objective is to investigate the pertinent literature on the experiences and satisfaction of patients with mental disorders receiving inpatient psychiatric care. Our goals are to highlight important ideas and explore the data that might serve as a guide to enhance the standard of treatment and patient satisfaction in acute mental health environments. This study is a scoping review that was designed in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement. A systematic search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE. A comprehensive review was completed, including articles from January 2012 to June 2022. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included in this review based on our eligibility criteria, such as patient satisfaction as a primary outcome, adult psychiatric inpatients, and non-review studies published in the English language. Studies were considered ineligible if they included nonpsychiatric patients or patients with neurocognitive disorders, review studies, or study measure outcomes other than inpatient satisfaction. For the eligible studies, data extraction was conducted, information was summarized, and the findings were reported. A total of 31 studies representing almost all the world's continents were eligible for inclusion in this scoping review. Different assessment tools and instruments were used in the included studies to measure the level of patients' satisfaction. The majority of the studies either utilized a pre-existing or newly created inpatient satisfaction questionnaire that appeared to be reliable and of acceptable quality. This review has identified a variety of possible factors that affect patients' satisfaction and can be used as a guide for service improvement. More than half of the included studies revealed that the following factors were strongly recommended to enhance inpatient satisfaction with care: a clear discharge plan, less coercive treatment during the hospital stay, more individualized, higher quality information and teaching about the mental disorder to patients by staff, better therapeutic relationships with staff, and specific treatment components that patients enjoy, such as physical exercise sessions and music therapy. Patients also value staff who spend more time with them. The scope of patient satisfaction with inpatient mental health services is a growing source of concern. Patient satisfaction is associated with better adherence to treatment regimens and fewer complaints against health care professionals. This scoping review has identified several patient satisfaction research gaps as well as important determinants of satisfaction and how to measure and utilize patient satisfaction as a guide for service quality improvement. It would be useful for future research and reviews to consider broadening their scope to include the satisfaction of psychiatric patients with innovative services, like peer support groups and other technologically based interventions like text for support. Future research also could benefit from utilizing additional technological tools, such as electronic questionnaires.

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) as a treatment option for isolated patellofemoral disease continues to evolve. Enhancement in patient selection, surgical technique, implant design, and technology has led to improved short-term and midterm outcomes. Furthermore, in the setting of a younger patient with isolated patellofemoral arthritis, PFA represents an option for improved function with faster recovery times, bone preservation, maintenance of ligamentous proprioception, and the ability to delay total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The most common reason for revising PFA to a TKA is progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. In general, conversion of PFA to TKA leads to successful outcomes with minimal bone loss and the ability to use primary TKA implants and instrumentation. PFA seems to be a cost-effective alternative to TKA in appropriately selected patients with 5-, 10-PFA survivorships of 91.7% and 83.3%, respectively, and an annual revision rate of 2.18%; however, more long-term clinical studies are needed to determine how new designs and technologies affect patient outcomes and implant performance.

Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are being increasingly introduced in clinical registries, providing a personal perspective on the expectations and impact of treatment. The aim of this study was to describe response rates (RR) to PROMs in clinical registries and databases and to examine the trends over time, and how they change with the registry type, region and disease or condition captured.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping literature review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature. All English studies on clinical registries capturing PROMs at one or more time points were included. Follow up time points were defined as follows: baseline (if available), < 1 year, 1 to < 2 years, 2 to < 5 years, 5 to < 10 years and 10 + years. Registries were grouped according to regions of the world and health conditions. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify trends in RRs over time. These included calculating average RRs, standard deviation and change in RRs according to total follow up time.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 1,767 publications. Combined with 20 reports and four websites, a total of 141 sources were used in the data extraction and analysis process. Following the data extraction, 121 registries capturing PROMs were identified. The overall average RR at baseline started at 71% and decreased to 56% at 10 + year at follow up. The highest average baseline RR of 99% was observed in Asian registries and in registries capturing data on chronic conditions (85%). Overall, the average RR declined as follow up time increased.

CONCLUSION

A large variation and downward trend in PROMs RRs was observed in most of the registries identified in our review. Formal recommendations are required for consistent collection, follow up and reporting of PROMs data in a registry setting to improve patient care and clinical practice. Further research studies are needed to determine acceptable RRs for PROMs captured in clinical registries.

A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty

To map literature on prognostic factors related to outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), to identify extensively studied factors and to guide future research into what domains need further exploration. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search string included multiple synonyms of the following keywords: "revision TKA", "outcome" and "prognostic factor". We searched for studies assessing the association between at least one prognostic factor and at least one outcome measure after rTKA surgery. Data on sample size, study design, prognostic factors, outcomes, and the direction of the association was extracted and included in an evidence map. After screening of 5,660 articles, we included 166 studies reporting prognostic factors for outcomes after rTKA, with a median sample size of 319 patients (30 to 303,867). Overall, 50% of the studies reported prospectively collected data, and 61% of the studies were performed in a single centre. In some studies, multiple associations were reported; 180 different prognostic factors were reported in these studies. The three most frequently studied prognostic factors were reason for revision (213 times), sex (125 times), and BMI (117 times). Studies focusing on functional scores and patient-reported outcome measures as prognostic factor for the outcome after surgery were limited (n = 42). The studies reported 154 different outcomes. The most commonly reported outcomes after rTKA were: re-revision (155 times), readmission (88 times), and reinfection (85 times). Only five studies included costs as outcome. Outcomes and prognostic factors that are routinely registered as part of clinical practice (e.g. BMI, sex, complications) or in (inter)national registries are studied frequently. Studies on prognostic factors, such as functional and sociodemographic status, and outcomes as healthcare costs, cognitive and mental function, and psychosocial impact are scarce, while they have been shown to be important for patients with osteoarthritis.

Minimum 5 Year Clinical Outcomes And Survivorship For A Single Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using Hybrid Fixation and Press-Fit Stems

BACKGROUND

Hybrid fixation, utilizing diaphyseal press-fit stems and cement fixation in the tibial and femoral metaphyseal areas, has long been a strategy for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorships of hybrid fixation using a single rTKA revision system with a minimum of 5 years follow-up.

METHODS

We reviewed our prospectively collected database to identify 281 patients who underwent rTKA using a single revision system with hybrid fixation and press-fit stems between July 2006 and August 2016. We reviewed the clinical outcome scores, including the Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12). We also evaluated the 5- and 10-year survivorships and the indications for re-operations.

RESULTS

The cohort had a mean age of 70 years (range, x to y) and a mean body mass index of 33.4 (range, x to y). The mean time from rTKA surgery was 11.1 years (range, x to y). Above in yellow goes into ethods section Paired t-test analyses showed significant improvements from pre-operative versus post-operative clinical outcome scores (P<0.001) for KSS, WOMAC and VR-12 Physical component. Prosthetic joint infections after index rTKA was the most common failure mode with 29 patients requiring re-operations. Re-revision due to aseptic loosening was uncommon (6 patients) with a cumulative survival rate of 95.2% at 5 years and 94.2% at 10 years.

CONCLUSION

The use of this single rTKA system utilizing press fit stems combined with hybrid fixation provided significant improvements in the clinical outcomes and excellent survivorships at 5 and 10 years.

The Strongest Oxford Knee Score Predictors of Subsequent Revision are 'Overall Pain,' 'Limping when Walking,' and 'Knee Giving Way'

BACKGROUND

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is used to measure knee arthroplasty outcomes, however, it is unclear which questions are more relevant. Our aims were to: 1) identify which OKS question(s) were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision and 2) compare predictive ability of the 'pain' and 'function' domains.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All primary total (TKAs) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with an OKS at six months (TKA n=27,708, UKA n=8,415), five years (TKA n=11,519, UKA n=3,365) or ten years (TKA n=6,311, UKA n=1,744) were included. Prediction models were assessed using logistic regressions and receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

A reduced model with three questions ('overall pain,' 'limping when walking,' 'knee giving way') showed better diagnostic ability than full OKS for predicting UKA revision at six months (area under the curve (AUC): 0.80 vs. 0.78; P<0.01) and five years (0.81 vs. 0.77; P=0.02), and comparable diagnostic ability for predicting TKA revision at all timepoints (6 months, 0.77 vs. 0.76; 5 years, 0.78 vs. 0.75; 10 years, 0.76 vs. 0.73; all not significant (NS)), and UKA revision at 10 years (0.80 vs. 0.77; NS). The pain domain had better diagnostic ability for predicting subsequent revision for both procedures at five and ten years.

CONCLUSION

Questions on 'overall pain', 'limping when walking', and 'knee 'giving way' were the strongest predictors of subsequent revision. Attention to low scores from these questions during follow-up may allow for prompt identification of patients most at risk of revision.

Team Approach: Management of Mental Health in Orthopaedic Patients

»

Mental health evaluation should be considered an essential part of the routine preoperative assessment and should be managed by a multidisciplinary team composed of the primary care physician, orthopaedic provider, and behavioral health specialist.

»

The scientific literature indicates that patients without comorbid psychiatric symptoms and adaptive coping strategies, resilience, and well-managed expectations have improved functional outcomes and satisfaction after orthopaedic procedures.

»

Psychological issues are multifaceted and require treatment tailored to each individual patient. Therefore, close communication between all members of the care team is required to create and execute the perioperative plan.

Preoperative Veterans Rand-12 Mental Composite Score of < 40 Leads to Increased Healthcare Utilization and Diminished Improvement After Primary Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Adverse outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been associated with preoperative psychological disorders and poor mental health. We aimed to investigate and quantify the association between preoperative mental health and 1) postoperative 90-day health care utilization; and 2) 1-year patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent primary elective TKA (n = 7,476) was performed. Preoperative mental health was evaluated using Veterans Rand-12 Mental Composite Scores (VR-12 MCS). Outcomes included prolonged length of stay (>2-days), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmissions, emergency department visits, and reoperation. Improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) achievement were evaluated at 1-year. Multivariable regression was implemented to explore associations between preoperative VR-12 MCS and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 5,402 (72.3%) completed 1-year follow-up. Lower preoperative VR-12 MCS was associated with higher odds of prolonged length of stay (MCS 20-39: odds ratio (OR): 1.46;P < .001), and nonhome discharge disposition (MCS 20-39: OR: 1.92;P < .001), but not 90-day readmission or reoperation (MCS20-39; P = .12 and P = .64). At 1-year, patients with a lower MCS were less likely to attain a substantial clinical benefit in KOOS-pain (MCS 0-19; OR: 0.25; P < .001) and less likely to achieve PASS (MCS20-39; OR: 0.74; P = .002). Patients with an MCS >60 were more likely to be discharged home (OR: 1.42; P = .008), achieve substantial clinical benefit in their KOOS-JR (OR: 1.16; P = .027),-Pain (OR: 1.220; P = .007) and PASS at 1-year (OR: 1.28; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower VR-12 MCS is associated with increased postoperative health care utilization and worse patient-reported outcome measures at 1-year post-TKA. These findings suggest that a VR-12 MCS ≤40 could be used to designate increased risk, guide the preoperative discussion and potential interventions.

The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize "Feeling Better" or "Feeling Good" After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the overlap between the two outcomes.

METHODS

We identified 1,239 primary, unilateral TKAs performed at a single institution in 2015-2019. PROMs including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS as per attainment of MCID was assessed. A multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of MCID and PASS.

RESULTS

In total, 71.3% achieved MCID and 75.5% achieved PASS for KOOS-JR. Only 7.7% achieved MCID but not PASS, whereas almost twice this number did not achieve MCID but did achieve PASS (11.9%). Poorer preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 0.925), better SF-12 physical (OR 1.025), and mental (OR 1.027) were associated with MCID attainment. In contrast, better preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 1.030) and SF-12 mental (OR 1.025) were associated with PASS attainment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and smoking status were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after TKA, albeit some positively and some negatively. In the era of value-based care, clinicians should not only strive to help patients "feel better" but also ensure that patients "feel good" after surgery. This study does not support the use of PROMs in prioritizing access to care.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at One Year Postoperatively in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Outcomes after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are variable, and it is unknown whether the indication for aseptic revision THA influences postoperative clinical improvement. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) assesses if changes in patient-reported outcome measure result in meaningful clinical benefit to patients. The purpose of this study was to quantify the 1-year postoperative MCID for aseptic revision THA and to assess the percentage of patients achieving the MCID for each revision diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective, single-institution registry of revision total joint arthroplasties was used. Retrospective review of 413 first-time aseptic revision THAs was performed. Demographics, revision diagnosis, preoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS Jr.), and 1-year postoperative HOOS Jr. were recorded. The MCID for the HOOS Jr. at one year postoperatively was calculated for each revision diagnosis using a distribution-based method. The percentage of patients exceeding the MCID with each diagnosis was determined.

RESULTS

There were 9 aseptic revision diagnoses, all with n ≥ 5. The 3 most common revision diagnosis were aseptic loosening (n = 114), dislocation or instability (n = 103), and polyethylene wear or osteolysis (n = 73). The MCID for all the aseptic revision THAs was 10.9. Seven of the nine revision diagnoses achieved the MCID. The highest percentage of patients achieving the MCID was for aseptic loosening (84.2%) and implant fracture (81.3%), whereas lowest was for adverse local tissue reaction (35.3%) and implant recall (20.0%).

CONCLUSION

The one-year revision THA MCID is 10.9 for the HOOS Jr. There is variability in the percentage of patients achieving the MCID based on diagnosis. Our data can be used to counsel patients undergoing revision THA for noninfectious etiologies.

Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the knee society score following revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

No previous study has evaluated the MCID for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to identify the MCID for the Knee Society Score (KSS), for revision TKA.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 270 patients who underwent revision TKA at a single institution was analysed. Clinical assessment was performed preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years using Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) and Knee (KSKS) Scores, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). MCID was evaluated with a three-pronged methodology, using (1) anchor-based method with linear regression, (2) anchor-based method with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under curve (AUC), (3) distribution-based method with standard deviation (SD). The anchors used were improvement in OKS ≥ 5, patient satisfaction, and implant survivorship following revision TKA.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 70% females, with mean age of 69.0 years, that underwent unilateral revision TKA. The MCID determined by anchor-based linear regression method using OKS was 6.3 for KSFS, and 6.6 for KSKS. The MCID determined by anchor-based ROC was between 15 and 20 for KSFS (AUC: satisfaction = 71.8%, survivorship = 61.4%) and between 33 and 34 for KSKS (AUC: satisfaction = 76.3%, survivorship = 67.1%). The MCID determined by distribution-based method of 0.5 SD was 11.7 for KSFS and 11.9 for KSKS.

CONCLUSION

The MCID of 6.3 points for KSFS, and 6.6 points for KSKS, is a useful benchmark for future studies looking to compare revision against primary TKA outcomes. Clinically, the MCID between 15 and 20 for KSFS and between 33 and 34 for KSKS is a powerful tool for discriminating patients with successful outcomes after revision TKA. Implant survivorship is an objective and naturally dichotomous outcome measure that complements the subjective measure of patient satisfaction, which future MCID studies could consider utilizing as anchors in ROC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Does Adjusting for Social Desirability Reduce Ceiling Effects and Increase Variation of Patient-Reported Experience Measures?

Social desirability bias (a tendency to underreport undesirable attitudes and behaviors) may account, in part, for the notable ceiling effects and limited variability of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) such as satisfaction, communication effectiveness, and perceived empathy. Given that there is always room for improvement for both clinicians and the care environment, ceiling effects can hinder improvement efforts. This study tested whether weighting of satisfaction scales according to the extent of social desirability can create a more normal distribution of scores and less ceiling effect. In a cross-sectional study 118 English-speaking adults seeking musculoskeletal specialty care completed 2 measures of satisfaction with care (one iterative scale and one 11-point ordinal scale), a measure of social desirability, and basic demographics. Normality of satisfaction scores was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk tests. After weighting for social desirability, scores on the iterative satisfaction scale had a more normal distribution while scores on the 11-point ordinal satisfaction scale did not. The ceiling effects in satisfaction decreased from 47% (n = 56) to 2.5% (n = 3) for the iterative scale, and from 81% (n = 95) to 2.5% (n = 3) for the ordinal scale. There were no differences in mean satisfaction when the social desirability was measured prior to completion of the satisfaction surveys compared to after. The observation that adjustment for levels of social desirability bias can reduce ceiling effects suggests that accounting for personal factors could help us develop PREMs with greater variability in scores, which may prove useful for quality improvement efforts.