What Is the Optimal Irrigation Solution in the Management of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

Chlorhexidine or Povidone-Iodine Solution Irrigation versus Saline Irrigation for the Prevention of Postoperative Infections in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the effectiveness of antiseptic irrigation solutions, specifically chlorhexidine, and povidone-iodine, compared to normal saline after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing the use of different intraoperative irrigation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 11 studies, including 67,742 patients, were included. The outcome of interest was the rate of deep infections. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effect model, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistics.

RESULTS

The random-effect model analysis revealed a PJI rate of 1.02% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.77 to 1.35; I2 = 90%) for the total cohort. Among 24,025 patients who received irrigation with either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine, the PJI rate was 0.86% (95% CI: 0.63 to 1.17; I2 = 75%). Povidone-iodine significantly reduced the risk of PJI compared to saline (RR [risk ratio] 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.95; P = 0.029; I2 = 61%). However, no significant difference was observed in the subgroups for THA (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.61; P = 0.57; I2 = 0%) and TKA (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.77; P = 0.21; I2 = 35%). Chlorhexidine also reduced the risk compared to saline (RR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.82; P = 0.001; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.84 to 3.06; P = 0.154; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine had a significantly reduced risk of PJI as compared with saline irrigation in TJA. There was no significant difference between chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine.

Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate are equally effective in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm grown on a titanium surface: an in-vitro analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the irrigation solution and concentration that should be used when performing a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery.

AIM

To determine the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of five antibacterial solutions and to compare their efficacies in eradicating staphylococcal biofilm embedded on a titanium surface.

METHODS

Meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) ATCC standard strains were grown over porous Ti-6Al-4V acetabular screw-caps. Antibacterial solutions were povidone-iodine, rifampicin, silver nitrate, copper sulphate, and chlorhexidine. MBEC values were calculated for MSSA and MRSA. After 24 h, screw-caps were exposed for 3 min to each solution. Bacterial separation from each specimen was performed with vortex agitation and footprint on agar plate in triplicate. Colony forming units (cfu) were counted pre- and post-agitation, and the delta of cfu/mL was calculated for each solution. A threefold log reduction in cfu was considered a measure of solution efficacy. Comparison between groups was made with Fisher's test.

FINDINGS

MBEC values for MSSA and MRSA, respectively, were as follows: 8000 μg/mL and 16,000 μg/mL for povidone-iodine; 64 μg/mL and 128 μg/mL for rifampicin; 10,000 μg/mL and 5120 μg/mL for silver nitrate; 900 μg/mL and 900 μg/mL for copper sulphate; 16 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL for chlorhexidine. Rifampicin, copper sulphate and chlorhexidine were ineffective against MSSA and MRSA biofilm compared with povidone-iodine (P<0.01) and silver nitrate (P=0.015) that had a delta cfu reduction >8 log. Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate showed negative footprints without visible MSSA (P=0.005) and MRSA (P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Povidone-iodine and silver nitrate were the only irrigating solutions capable of eradicating at least 99.9% of 24-h biofilm.

Does a Specific Sequential Combination of Antiseptic Solutions for Chemical Debridement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improve Outcomes vs. Solution Alone? An In Vivo Study

Background: Chemical debridement is a fundamental step during the surgical treatment of both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is no consensus on the optimal solution, nor is there sufficient evidence on the optimal irrigation time and combination of solutions. In an in vitro study, our group recently demonstrated that sequential combination debridement (SCD) with 3% acetic acid (AA) followed by 10% povidone iodine (PI) and 5 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was the best strategy for reducing bacterial load. The present study aimed to validate these findings in an in vivo model. Results: The median (IQR) log CFU/mL was lower in the group of mice treated with SCD (2.85 [0.00-3.72]) than in the Bactisure™ group (4.02 [3.41-4.72], p = 0.02). While this reduction was also greater than in the PI group (3.99 [1.11-4.33]), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.19). Cell viability assays showed no differences between treatments. S. aureus bacteremia was detected in 10% of mice treated with SCD, compared to 30% in the PI group and 10% in the Bactisure™ group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.36). Conclusion: Our findings confirm that SCD significantly reduced bacterial load in an in vivo S. aureus PJI model, showing superior anti-biofilm activity compared to Bactisure™ and comparable performance to PI alone. These results highlight SCD's potential to serve as a standardized chemical debridement protocol, combining enhanced efficacy with clinical applicability. Methods: We tested SCD with 3% AA for 3 min, 10% PI for 3 min, and H2O2 for 3 min in a 7-day Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC29213)-based murine femur PJI model and compared the results with single treatments of 10% PI for 3 min or Bactisure™ solution for 3 min. A sterile steel implant with local administration of saline solution for 3 min was used as a non-infected control. After completing irrigation procedures, under anesthesia, mice were euthanized, and implants were analyzed for CFU/mL counts and cell viability rates. Blood cultures were obtained pre-euthanasia to detect bacteremia.

Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy and therapeutic index properties for common wound cleansing solutions, focusing on solutions containing PHMB

Background

Surgical site infections (SSIs) have been shown to increase patient morbidity and mortality, impact on quality of life and place a significant economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Irrigation using wound cleansing and antiseptic effective solutions during surgical procedures is a key part of SSI prevention. The optimal solution would have minimal cytotoxicity to the patient while maintaining a minimum concentration required for antimicrobial activity necessary to prevent opportunistic pathogens and biofilm formation.

Method

A variety of common wound irrigation products, including polyhexanide in various concentrations and compositions, iodine and hypochlorous acid-based solutions, were tested and compared for their activity against pathogens according to the ESKAPE group of nosocomial relevant microbes. The antimicrobial efficacy of the solutions was tested against planktonic cells using a time-kill assay. Its minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) and its cytotoxicity against mouse fibroblast cells were determined. Finally, the Therapeutic Index (TI) was compared and the biofilm activity of a selected solution containing 0.1% polyhexanide (PHMB) was tested.

Results

Irrigation solutions containing 0.1% PHMB demonstrated rapid inactivation against planktonic cultures, achieving >4 lg reduction within 60 seconds. When comparing the TI of all irrigation solutions tested, the combination of 0.1% PHMB and poloxamer as an additive showed the best results in killing nosocomial pathogens and also to be less cytotoxic to mammalian fibroblasts, as demonstrated for PREVENTIA® Surgical Irrigation. When exposed to five single-species biofilms, PREVENTIA® Surgical Irrigation showed a 3 lg reduction (average) after 60 minutes; this was supported by microscopy showing significant biofilm disruption and an abundance of non-viable microcolony formations.

Conclusion

This study highlights the impact of irrigation solutions containing PHMB. It also demonstrated the effect of using different concentrations of PHMB in combination with surfactants as additives. The combination of 0.1% PHMB and poloxamer as a surfactant demonstrated effective benefits in eradicating established biofilm combined with a relatively high Therapeutic Index (TI), indicating low cytotoxicity and high bactericidal activity.

Effects of antiseptic irrigation solutions on osseointegration in a cementless tibial implantation mouse model

Despite the success of standard antiseptic irrigation solutions in reducing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates, there is still a need for more effective solutions. Synergistic use of povidone-iodine (PI) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has shown promising results; however, the optimal solution concentration balancing bactericidal activity and osseointegration remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the impact of these antiseptic irrigation solutions on osseointegration and the bone-implant interface strength in vivo. Forty C57BL/6 mice underwent bilateral tibial implantation surgery and were randomly allocated into three groups receiving 0.3% PI, 10% PI mixed with 3% H2O2, or saline as irrigation solutions intraoperatively. Assessments were performed on postoperative Days 1 and 28, including plain radiographs, microcomputed tomography (microCT) evaluation, histological analysis, immunohistochemistry, and biomechanical pull-out testing. No wound complications were observed. MicroCT scans revealed no differences in peri-implant trabecular bone parameters. Biomechanical pull-out testing showed no differences in the bone-implant interface strength across groups. Histological analysis indicated no differences in bone and bone marrow percentage areas among treatment groups. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated no differences among groups in peri-implant osteocalcin, osterix, or endomucin-positive cells. In conclusion, using either antiseptic irrigation solution showed no differences in osseointegration parameters compared to the control group, demonstrating safety and the absence of toxicity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dilute 0.3% povidone-iodine and a 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine mixed with 3% hydrogen peroxide can be safely used during primary and revision total joint arthroplasty without compromising osseointegration or causing wound complications.

Efficacy of the preformulated irrigation solution Bactisure® in acute periprosthetic joint infection debridement surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite significant progress in orthopaedic surgery, the prevalence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains persistent, and future increases are expected due to the increasing number of joint arthroplasties. PJIs are intricately connected to biofilm-producing bacteria, which encase infected prostheses, impairing the effectiveness of antibiotics and the immune system. Acute PJIs with immature biofilms are traditionally managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). However, to date, there has not been a conclusive direct clinical comparison (in vivo) demonstrating the superiority of one irrigation solution over others. Recently, there has been a growing interest in irrigation solutions with antibiofilm properties demonstrated in in vitro studies, exemplified by the preformulated Bactisure® irrigation solution, which contains ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, and sterile water. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness (infection cure rate) of preformulated Bactisure® irrigation solution in vivo compared with saline solution in a control group of patients with acute knee and/or hip periprosthetic infections treated with DAIR.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial involving patients with acute haematogenous PJI who received standard DAIR surgery from December 2022 to December 2024. The type of irrigation solution used during surgery will include two groups allocated at a 1:1 ratio: a control group (n = 25) with saline solution and an experimental group (n = 25) receiving the Bactisure® preformulated solution. The sample size was calculated based on an expected reduction in reinfection rates from 45% in the control group to 10% in the experimental group. Data on baseline patient characteristics, clinical and radiological information, and healthcare questionnaires will be recorded. All patients will be followed for minimum of 12 months. The infection cure rate at 1 year will be the primary outcome.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to compare the effectiveness of preformulated Bactisure® irrigation solution with that of saline solution in real clinical practice (in vivo) in patients with acute knee and/or hip periprosthetic infections treated with DAIR. Our main hypothesis is that, compared with saline solution, Bactisure® provides a better infection cure rate at 1 year post-DAIR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10873696 . Registered on December 19, 2023.

Antibiotic dip and irrigation solutions confer increased antimicrobial efficacy of inflatable penile prosthesis hydrophilic surfaces compared with 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate

BACKGROUND

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) (0.05%) has recently been suggested as both a dip for the hydrophilic surface and an irrigation solution in the setting of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery.

AIM

The study sought to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.05% CHG with vancomycin and gentamicin (VG) antibiotics as dip and/or irrigation solutions in the setting of a hydrophilic PP surface in vitro.

METHODS

Sterile PPs with a hydrophilic coating were obtained. A series of experiments were performed to evaluate the efficacy of normal saline (NS), 0.05% CHG, or VG as dip and/or irrigation solutions to reduce methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to PP surfaces. The 8-mm discs from PPs were incubated in 105 colony-forming units/mL of methicillin-sensitive S aureus for 48 hours, plated, and counted. Disc-diffusion tests were conducted by suspending 6-mm discs for 2 minutes in NS, 0.05% CHG, or VG, then placing them coated side down onto plates streaked with the following organisms: methicillin-sensitive S aureus, S epidermidis, Enterococcus, and Escherichia coli. After 24 hours of growth, zones of inhibition were measured.

OUTCOMES

We found average bacterial counts (colony-forming units/mL) and zones of inhibition (mm) following a series of treatment protocols of PP discs.

RESULTS

PP discs dipped in VG reduced bacterial adhesion to the implant surface >0.05% CHG (~5.5 log vs ~1.5 log; P < .01). Discs irrigated with either 0.05% CHG or NS removed all dip solution adsorbed to the hydrophilic surface, allowing bacterial growth. VG irrigation adsorbed to the hydrophilic surface even after 0.05% CHG or NS dips, reducing bacterial adherence (~3 log). Dipping and irrigating discs with VG was most effective in reducing adherent bacteria (~5.5 log) and was the only irrigation that showed antimicrobial activity.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

VG, when used both as a prophylactic dip and as an intraoperative irrigation solution for hydrophilic penile implant surfaces, has improved efficacy to 0.05% CHG and NS.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This is the first study to compare the use of VG, 0.05% CHG, and NS as prophylactic dips and intraoperative irrigations for hydrophilic penile implant surfaces. Limitations include the use of in vitro studies, which serve as a proxy for in vivo practices and may not be entirely accurate nor translatable clinically.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the superior efficacy of VG as a combined dip and irrigation solution for hydrophilic penile implant surfaces compared with 0.05% CHG.

The Mark Coventry Award: PhotothermAA Gel Combined With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Significantly Decreases Implant Biofilm Burden and Soft-Tissue Infection in a Rabbit Model of Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication of total joint arthroplasty. The underlying pathogenesis often involves the formation of bacterial biofilm that protects the pathogen from both host immune responses and antibiotics. The gold standard treatment requires implant removal, a procedure that carries associated morbidity and mortality risks. Strategies to preserve the implant while treating PJI are desperately needed. Our group has developed an anti-biofilm treatment, PhotothermAA gel, which has shown complete eradication of 2-week-old mature biofilm in vitro. In this study, we tested the anti-biofilm efficacy and safety of PhotothermAA in vivo when combined with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) in a rabbit model of knee PJI.

METHODS

New Zealand white rabbits (n = 21) underwent knee joint arthrotomy, titanium tibial implant insertion, and inoculation with Xen36 (bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus) after capsule closure. At 2 weeks, rabbits underwent sham surgery (n = 6), DAIR (n = 6), or PhotothermAA with DAIR (n = 9) and were sacrificed 2 weeks later to measure implant biofilm burden, soft-tissue infection, and tissue necrosis.

RESULTS

The combination of anti-biofilm PhotothermAA with DAIR significantly decreased implant biofilm coverage via scanning electron microscopy compared to DAIR alone (1.8 versus 81.0%; P < .0001). Periprosthetic soft-tissue cultures were significantly decreased in the PhotothermAA with DAIR treatment group (log reduction: Sham 1.6, DAIR 2.0, combination 5.6; P < .0001). Treatment-associated necrosis was absent via gross histology of tissue adjacent to the treatment area (P = .715).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of an anti-biofilm solution like PhotothermAA as a supplement to current treatments that allow implant retention may prove useful in PJI treatment.

Clinical use and applications of a citrate-based antiseptic lavage for the prevention and treatment of PJI

Total joint arthroplasties (TJA) are some of the most commonly performed surgeries in the United States with the number of TJA expected to rise significantly over the next decade as the population ages and arthritic burden worsens. However, the rise in TJA volume correlates with a heightened risk of complications, notably prosthetic joint infections (PJI), despite their low occurrence rate of less than 2%. PJI imposes a significant burden on surgery success, patient well-being, and healthcare costs, with an estimated annual expense of 1.85 billion dollars for hip and knee PJI by 2030. This manuscript delves into the pathophysiology of PJI, exploring our current understanding of the role of bacterial biofilm formation on implanted foreign hardware, providing protection against the host immune system and antibiotics. The article reviews current agents and their efficacy in treating PJI, as well as their cytotoxicity toward native cells involved in wound healing, prompting the exploration of a novel citrate-based solution. The paper highlights the superior properties and efficacy of a novel citrate-based irrigation solution on the treatment and prevention of PJI via increased antimicrobial properties, greater biofilm disruption, increased exposure time, and reduced cytotoxicity compared to conventional solutions, positioning it as a promising alternative. It also provides a perspective on its clinical use in the operating theater, with a step-by-step approach in TJA, whether primary or revisionary.

Impact of a Novel Antiseptic Lavage Solution on Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a challenge following hip or knee arthroplasty, demanding immediate intervention to prevent implant failure and systemic issues. Bacterial biofilm development on orthopedic devices worsens PJI severity, resulting in recurrent hospitalizations and significant economic burdens. The objective of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the efficacy of this novel antiseptic solution, never previously evaluated in vivo, in managing early post-operative or acute hematogenous PJI following primary hip and knee joint replacements. Methods: The inclusion criteria consist of patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or knee arthroplasty diagnosed with acute PJI through preoperative and intraoperative investigations, in accordance with the MSIS ICM 2018 criteria. The minimum required follow-up was 12 months from the cessation of antibiotic therapy. This novel antiseptic lavage solution is composed of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride and water. Data included demographic characteristics, diagnostic criteria, surgical techniques, post-operative treatment and follow-up outcomes. Results: A total of 39 patients treated with Debridement, Antibiotics Pearls and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) procedures using this solution between May 2021 and April 2023 were analyzed. At a mean follow-up of 24.6 ± 6.4 months, infection recurrence-free survival rates were 87.2%, with no local allergic reactions or relevant systemic adverse effects detected. Persistent PJI necessitated two-stage revision surgery. Conclusions: This novel antiseptic lavage solution shows promise as an adjunctive tool in the treatment of PJI, demonstrating support in infection control while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) in the Treatment of Early Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infections: A Literature Review

(1) Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are severe and frightening complications in orthopaedic surgery, and they are generally divided into three categories: early infections (those occurring within the first 4-6 weeks), delayed infections (those occurring between 3 and 24 months), and late infections (those occurring more than 2 years after surgery). PJI treatment comprises "debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention" (DAIR), single-stage revision, and double-stage revision. Nowadays, to improve the chances of retaining an infected implant and to improve the traditional DAIR method, a modified surgical technique has been developed, named DAPRI (debridement, antibiotic pearls, and retention of the implant). Our study aims to present an up-to-date concept evaluation of the DAPRI technique and its success rate. (2) Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, applying a protocol defined by the authors: a total of 765 articles were identified, and at the end of the screening process only 7 studies were included. (3) Results: Currently, the DAPRI procedure can be performed only on patients who have had PJI symptoms for less than 4 weeks, and in order to achieve the highest success rate, indications are quite strict: it is appropriate in patients with acute, superficial infections without sinus tract presence, and well-fixed implants with known sensitive bacteria. The DAPRI surgical method follows a step-by-step process consisting of a first phase of biofilm identification with intra-articular injection of methylene blue, followed by biofilm removal (thermic, mechanical, and chemical aggression), and a last step consisting of prevention of PJI recurrence by using calcium sulphate antibiotic-added beads. (4) Conclusions: The DAPRI approach improves the traditional DAIR technique. It is a correct treatment for acute and early haematogenous PJI, and improves the DAIR success rate.

Application of the New Irrigation Protocol to Reduce Recurrence Rate in the Management Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

OBJECTIVE

Irrigation is a conventional treatment for acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, there has been no unified standard for irrigation during surgery for PJI in the past, and the efficacy is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to create a new irrigation protocol to enhance the infection control rate and reduce the postoperative recurrence rate of PJI patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective review with a total of 56 patients who underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasties due to PJI from January 2011 to January 2022. Conventional irrigation (CI) was used in 32 cases, and standard operating procedure of irrigation (SOPI) was used in 24. The CI protocol carries out an empirical irrigation after debridement, which is quite random. Our SOPI protocol clearly stipulates the soaking concentration and time of hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine. The irrigation is carried out three times, and tissue samples are taken from multiple parts before and after irrigation, which are sent for microbial culture. The important statistical indicators were the rate of positive microbiological culture and postoperative recurrence rate with an average follow-up of 24 average months.

RESULTS

The drainage volume was lower in the SOPI group than in the CI group on postoperative day 3 (p < 0.01) and 7 (p = 0.016). In addition, the percentage of positive microbiological cultures after the third irrigation was less than that before (p < 0.01) and after (p < 0.01) the first irrigation. The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus, which was detected in 25.0% and 12.5% of the SOPI and CI groups, respectively. The failure rate at the final follow-up was 8.3% and 31.3% (p = 0.039) for the SOPI and CI groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the traditional CI method, SOPI standardized the soaking time of hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine, increased the frequency of and irrigation, and proved that microorganisms were almost completely removed through the microbial culture of multiple tissues. SOPI has the potential to become a standardized irrigation process worthy of promotion, effectively reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of PJI patients.

The value of sequential application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine and physiological saline in reducing postoperative infections after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Currently, in the field of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), there are no studies that have demonstrated the value of the sequential application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and physiological saline during the surgical procedure in decreasing postoperative infections in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and in decreasing the incidence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in particular. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the sequential application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and physiological saline in reducing postoperative infections in TKA.

METHODS

The study prospectively included 4743 patients, with Group A (2371, 49.9%) receiving sequential intraoperative application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and physiological saline irrigation of the incision, and Group B (2372, 50.1%) receiving intraoperative application of physiological saline irrigation of the incision only, to collect the patients' baseline data and clinical characteristics, and to statistically assess the incidence of superficial infections and the PJI during the follow up period to evaluate the clinical value of the study.

RESULTS

The baseline levels of patients in Groups A and B were comparable. There were 132 (2.8%) lost visits during the study period. The incidence of superficial infections within 30 days after surgery was 0.22% in Group A and 1.17% in Group B, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.007). The incidence of PJI was 0.17% in Group A and 1.26% in Group B, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.0121).

CONCLUSION

Sequential application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and physiological saline to irrigate incision in TKA can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative superficial infections and PJI. The scientific and rational application of this therapy intraoperatively greatly reduces the incidence of PJI and postoperative superficial infections, which is of great benefit to the patient's prognosis.

The Effect of Povidone-Iodine Irrigation on the Efficacy of Antibiotic Cement In Vitro

Povidone-iodine is a common antiseptic demonstrating success in reducing infection rates in primary arthroplasty; however, recent data suggest that its use in revision arthroplasty may increase infection rates. This study evaluated the effect of povidone-iodine solution on antibiotic cement and investigated the connection between povidone-iodine and increased infection rates in revision arthroplasty. Sixty antibiotic cement samples (ACSs) were formed using gentamicin-impregnated cement. The ACSs were divided into three groups: group A (n=20) was subject to a 3-minute povidone-iodine soak followed by a saline rinse; group B (n=20) underwent a 3-minute saline soak; and group C (n=20) underwent only a saline rinse. The antimicrobial activity of the samples was tested using a Kirby-Bauer-like assay using Staphylococcus epidermidis. The zone of inhibition (ZOI) was measured every 24 hours for 7 days. All groups possessed the greatest antimicrobial activity at 24 hours. Group C displayed a mass-corrected ZOI of 395.2 mm/g, which was statistically greater than the group B ZOI (313.2 mm/g, P<.05) but not the group A ZOI (346.5 mm/g, P>.05). All groups demonstrated a decrease in antimicrobial activity at 48 through 96 hours, with no significant difference at any time point. Prolonged soaking of antibiotic cement in a povidone-iodine or saline solution results in elution of the antibiotic into the irrigation solution, blunting initial antibiotic concentration. When using antibiotic cement, antiseptic soaks or irrigation should be focused prior to cementation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):10-14.].

A Review of Surgical Irrigation Solutions for Infection Prevention in Orthopaedic Surgery

» Intraoperative surgical irrigation is a common practice in orthopaedic procedures, although there is no universally established standard of care due to a lack of concrete data supporting an optimal irrigation agent.» Isotonic normal saline has long been considered a safe and cost effective solution for wound irrigation as compared with other antibiotic and antiseptic irrigation solutions.» Currently, the only adjunct to saline that is formally supported by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and World Health Organization is povidone-iodine.» Further in vivo clinical studies are needed to identify the ideal irrigation solution that carries low cytotoxic effects while also exerting optimal antimicrobial properties.

An In Vitro Study to Assess the Best Strategy for the Chemical Debridement of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Irrigation and debridement using an irrigation solution is a fundamental step during the surgical treatment of both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is no consensus on the optimal solution, nor is there sufficient evidence on the optimal irrigation time and combination of solutions. Therefore, it is necessary to determine which solution or combination of solutions is most efficacious against biofilm, as well as the optimal irrigation time. We conducted an experimental in vitro model by inoculating stainless steel discs with ATCC strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and a clinical strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. The discs were all irrigated with commonly used antiseptic solutions (10% and 3% povidone iodine, hydrogen peroxide, 3% acetic acid, and Bactisure™) for 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min and their combinations for 9 min (3 min each) vs. sterile saline as a positive control. We evaluated the reduction in biofilm based on colony-forming unit (cfu) counts and in combination assays, also based on cell viability and scanning electron microscopy. All antiseptics alone reduced more than 90% of cfu counts after 1 min of irrigation; the worst results were for hydrogen peroxide and 3% acetic acid. When solutions were sequentially combined, the best results were observed for all those starting with acetic acid, in terms of both reduction of log cfu/mL counts and viable cells. We consider that a combination of antiseptic solutions, particularly that comprising the sequence acetic acid + povidone iodine + hydrogen peroxide, would be the best option for chemical debridement during PJI surgery.

Outcomes in revision knee arthroplasty: Preventing reoperation for infection Keynote lecture - BASK annual congress 2023

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients have a lower survival rate and lower post-surgical outcomes compared to primary TKA patients. Infection and aseptic loosening are the most common reasons for revision and re-revision TKAs, with infection accounting for nearly half of re-revision cases. To prevent infection, patient optimization addressing obesity, diabetes, malnutrition, and smoking cessation is crucial. Advancements in irrigation solutions, antibiotic-impregnated bone fillers, bacteriophage therapy, and electrochemical therapy hold promise for preventing infection. Technical strategies such as obtaining sufficient component fixation, joint line restoration, and using robot assistance may improve revision TKA outcomes. As the burden of revision TKA continues to rise, substantial efforts remain for mitigating future revision TKAs and their associated complications.

Hydrogen Peroxide, Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Fail to Eradicate Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm from Infected Implant Materials

Hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and chlorhexidine are antiseptics that are commonly added to irrigants to either prevent or treat infection. There are little clinical data available that demonstrate efficacy of adding antiseptics to irrigants in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after biofilm establishment. The objective of the study was to assess the bactericidal activity of the antiseptics on S. aureus planktonic and biofilm. For planktonic irrigation, S. aureus was exposed to different concentrations of antiseptics. S. aureus biofilm was developed by submerging a Kirschner wire into normalized bacteria and allowing it to grow for forty-eight hours. The Kirschner wire was then treated with irrigation solutions and plated for CFU analysis. Hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and chlorhexidine were bactericidal against planktonic bacteria with over a 3 log reduction (p < 0.0001). Unlike cefazolin, the antiseptics were not bactericidal (less than 3 log reduction) against biofilm bacteria but did have a statistical reduction in biofilm as compared to the initial time point (p < 0.0001). As compared to cefazolin treatment alone, the addition of hydrogen peroxide or povidone-iodine to cefazolin treatment only additionally reduced the biofilm burden by less than 1 log. The antiseptics demonstrated bactericidal properties with planktonic S. aureus; however, when used to irrigate S. aureus biofilms, these antiseptics were unable to decrease biofilm mass below a 3 log reduction, suggesting that S. aureus biofilm has a tolerance to antiseptics. This information should be considered when considering antibiotic tolerance in established S. aureus biofilm treatment.

Prevention of surgical site infection: a ten-step approach

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. Similarly, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is a major cause of failure after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). As the annual volume of TJA procedures is projected to rise, so will the rate of subsequent SSI and PJI. Currently, prevention has been identified as the single most important strategy for combating SSI/PJI. Hence, the present article will serve as a summary of an evidence-based ten-step approach for SSI/PJI prevention that may help orthopedic surgeons with their infection prevention strategies.

Stability analysis of tranexamic acid in the presence of various antiseptic solutions

Tranexamic acid (TXA) effectively reduces blood loss and transfusion risk during total joint arthroplasty. Additionally, intraoperative irrigation with various antiseptic solutions is often utilized for the management and prevention of surgical site infection. However, interactions between various antiseptic solutions and TXA have not been investigated. The purpose of this in vitro study is to evaluate the stability of TXA in the presence of common orthopedic antiseptic solutions. Five antiseptic solutions-0.1% chlorhexidine (CHX) gluconate, 10% povidone-iodine (BTD), 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's), 3% hydrogen peroxide (H₂ O₂ ), and 1.5% H₂ O₂ -and a 0.9% normal saline (NS) control were obtained. A stock 100 mg/ml TXA solution was diluted in each antiseptic solution to a concentration of 10.0 mg/ml to generate reference standard and stability samples. TXA stability in each solution was measured using high performance liquid chromatography at t = 0 and t = 120 min and reported as mean percent of theoretical concentration (MPT) with associated relative standard deviation (RSD). All experiments were performed in triplicate at room temperature. At t = 0 min, TXA remained stable when mixed with 0.9% NS, 0.1% CHX, 10% BTD, 3% H₂ O₂ , and 1.5% H₂ O₂ (MPT range: 102.0%-105.0%, RSD range: 0.80%-2.92%). Only 0.5% Dakin's led to significant degradation of TXA at t = 0 min (MPT: 14.3%, RSD:1.28%). At t = 120 min, TXA stability persisted for all compounds except Dakin's 0.5% (MPT: 18.4%, RSD: 28.7%). TXA efficacy may be significantly diminished when 0.5% Dakin's is used as an intraoperative irrigation solution. CHX, BTD, and H₂ O₂ do not degrade TXA.

2022 American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Symposium: Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the leading cause of failure in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. This article is a brief summary of a symposium on PJI that was presented at the annual AAHKS meeting. It will provide an overview of current technqiues in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PJI. It will also highlight emerging technologies in this setting.

Orthopaedic Operating Room Fire Risks: FDA Database and Literature Review

»

Inadvertent activation of electrosurgical device was more likely to result in patient burns and harm.

»

There are significant knowledge gaps in the orthopaedic surgery community relating to fire prevention, fire safety, and fire management.

»

Arthroplasty was the most common procedure with reported fire events.

»

It is the responsibility of the orthopaedic surgeon to understand the risks of surgical fire in the operating room and implement actions to reduce those risks.

Preclosure povidone-iodine lavage in total hip replacement surgery: Infection outcomes and cost-benefit analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of preclosure povidone-iodine lavage (PrePIL) used to reduce the risk of infection following total hip replacement (THR) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

ANIMALS

One thousand six hundred ninety-nine dogs, 17 cats.

METHODS

The medical records of 2213 consecutive THR cases were reviewed to determine the incidence of infection. The last 102 were treated with PrePIL using a commercially sourced 0.035% povidone-iodine solution. Postoperative infection rates were compared. A cost-benefit analysis was used to calculate if a PrePIL protocol is economically feasible.

RESULTS

Twenty-one THRs out of 2111 (0.99%) that did not have PrePIL developed infection. Infection occurred in none of the 102 PrePIL cases. Cost analysis revealed a PrePIL break-even cost at $49.74 and a break-even infection rate of 0.949%. No complications were identified related to the use of PrePIL.

CONCLUSION

Preclosure povidone-iodine lavage appeared to be efficacious in lowering THR infection rates, and it appeared to be safe for this use based on our 102 consecutive cases. The cost of the PrePIL was minimal compared to the overall cost to resolve THR infection and the potential effect on hip function prognosis. The math formulas developed can be used by surgeons to calculate cost effectiveness and break-even cost based on their THR infection rate, and to compare to the cost of a THR revision and infection resolution.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

At current costs, PrePIL can be used in 2415 THR cases at a similar cost of a single revision surgery and resolution of a periprosthetic infection.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Normal-Saline Pulsed Lavage for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a well-described complication after total joint arthroplasty which imposes a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality on the individual, as well as cost to the health-care system. This study used a break-even analysis to investigate the cost-effectiveness of pulsed saline lavage (PSL) for PJI prophylaxis after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

An established model was used to calculate the minimum cost-effective absolute risk reduction of PSL for infection prophylaxis after a total joint arthroplasty. Baseline infection rates of TKA and THA and the cost of a revision surgery for PJI were derived from the literature while the cost of PSL implementation was obtained from institutional data.

Results

PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.10%, revision costs of $32,132 for TKA PJI, and a protocol cost of $38.28 if it reduces infection rates by 0.12% or prevents infection in 1 out of 839 patients. PSL is cost-effective at an initial infection rate of 1.63% and a revision cost of $39,713 for THA PJI if it reduces infection rates by 0.10% or prevents infection in 1 out of 1037 patients. The absolute risk reduction needed for economic viability did not change with varying baseline infection rates and did not exceed 0.38% for infection treatment costs as low as $10,000 and remained less than 0.47% even if PSL cost was as high as $150.

Conclusions

The use of PSL is a cost-effective protocol for PJI prophylaxis after TKAs and THAs.

Irrigation Solutions and Antibiotic Powders: Should I Use Them in Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The prevention and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection is of utmost importance to orthopedic surgeons. Irrigation solutions have become a popular additive to the prevention and treatment armamentarium.

METHODS

This symposium summarizes the mechanism of action, basic science, and clinical research to date on the use of irrigation solutions. The four most commonly used irrigation solutions, povidone iodine, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, and acetic acid, are discussed. In addition, the role of antibiotic powers is reviewed.

RESULTS

Each solution has its risks and benefits that must be weighed by the surgeon. There is no clear irrigation solution that is superior. The role of additive antibiotic powder (vancomycin) remains controversial.

CONCLUSION

More rigorous prospective clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal irrigation solution for the prevention and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.

A Novel Irrigant to Eliminate Planktonic Bacteria and Eradicate Biofilm Superstructure With Persistent Effect During Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have examined the use of topical and irrigation-related adjuvants to decrease the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty. Many issues related to their use remain to be investigated. These include cost, antibiotic stewardship, bactericidal effect on planktonic bacteria, host cytotoxicity, necessity to irrigate/dilute potentially cytotoxic agents after their application, and impact on biofilm.

METHODS

Bacterial strains of microorganisms were grown in optimal medium. After the growth phase, the organisms were exposed to the novel irrigation solution (XPerience) or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) for 5 minutes before a neutralizing broth was added. The colony-forming units per milliliter and the log reduction in colony-forming units in the treated sample vs the control were then determined. Subsequently, biofilms of microorganisms were grown on hydroxyapatite-coated glass slides. Each slide was then exposed to irrigation solutions for various contact times. Biofilm quantification was performed and the log10 density of each organism was obtained.

RESULTS

In vitro testing of the irrigant demonstrated 6-log reductions in planktonic bacteria in 5 minutes, and 4-log to 8-log reductions in biofilms. Laboratory tissue testing has demonstrated minimal cytotoxic effects to host tissue allowing for solution to remain in contact with the host without need for subsequent irrigation, creating a barrier to biofilm for up to 5 hours after its application.

CONCLUSION

This novel irrigant demonstrates high efficacy against both planktonic bacteria and bacterial biofilms in laboratory testing. Large series in vivo data are necessary to further establish its efficacy in reducing primary and recurrent surgical site infections.