Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To synthesise the evidence on the prevalence of associated intraarticular lesions in subjects with acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations.

METHODS

A search in two electronic databases (PUMBMED and EMBASE) was performed from 1985 to 2019. Two independent reviewers selected studies that complied with the following inclusion criteria: (1) the study included data on surgically treated ACJ dislocation grade III-V in the Rockwood classification, (2) the ACJ injuries were acute (the surgery was performed less than 6 weeks after injury), (3) an arthroscopic evaluation of the glenohumeral joint was performed during surgery. The quality of the studies included was assessed using the tool of the Joanna Briggs Institute.

RESULTS

A total of 47 studies with acute ACJ injuries met the initial inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 studies (9 retrospective case series, 9 prospective case series and 3 retrospective cohort studies) presented data on associated intraarticular lesions amenable for use in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysed studies included a total of 860 subjects with acute ACJ dislocations with a male/female ratio of 6.5 and a mean age of 32 years. The meta-analysis showed a prevalence of associated intraarticular lesions in subjects with acute ACJ of 19.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.0-26.4%; 21 studies, 860 analysed participants; P = 0.000; I²: 74.5% random-effects model; low risk of bias).

CONCLUSION

One in five subjects with surgically treated acute ACJ dislocations will have an associated intraarticular lesion that requires further intervention. The case for a customary arthroscopic evaluation of the joint, even when an open procedure is performed to deal with the ACJ dislocation, is strong. Level of evidence IV Trial registry Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42018090609.

Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations account for about 9% of shoulder injuries. Among them, acute high-grade injury following high-energy trauma accounts for a large proportion of patients requiring surgical treatment. However, there is no gold standard procedure for operative treatment of acute high-grade AC joint injury, and several different procedures have been used for this purpose in clinical practice. This review article summarizes the most recent and relevant surgical options for acute high-grade AC joint dislocation patients and the outcomes of each treatment type.

[Arthroscopic Twin Tail TightRope combined with distal joint capsule repair technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate arthroscopic treatment for acute acromioclavicular dislocation by using Twin Tail TightRope combined with distal joint capsular repair.

METHODS

The clinical data of 40 patients with acromioclavicular dislocation treated between February 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into arthroscopic group (20 cases, using arthroscopic Twin Tail TightRope combined with distal joint capsular repair for anatomical repair of stable structure of acromioclavicular joint) and control group (20 cases, treated with clavicular hook plate internal fixation) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, Rockwood classification, time from injury to operation, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Constant score between the two groups ( P>0.05), which were comparable. Postoperative VAS score and Constant score were used to assess shoulder function and re-dislocation was also observed.

RESULTS

The incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, and no early postoperative complications occurred. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 13.5 months). Postoperative X-ray films showed good anatomical reduction in both groups, but the clavicular hook had a presense in the subacromial space in control group. All patients in arthroscopic group achieved satisfactory shoulder function and returned to work after operation; there was no obvious pain, no complications such as exposure of implant after operation, and no need to remove the implant. In the control group, 4 patients had obvious subacromial impingement pain after operation, and 1 patient had re-dislocation after removal of internal fixator at 1 year after operation; the rest had no complications related to internal fixation, and the internal fixators were removed at 1.0-1.5 years after operation, without re-dislocation. The VAS score and Constant score at 3 months and 1 year after operation in both groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and further improved at 1 year after operation ( P<0.05). The VAS score and Constant score at 3 months and 1 year after operation in arthroscopic group were significantly better than those in control group ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic treatment for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by using Twin Tail TightRope combined with distal capsular repair is more effective than traditional incision surgery and can obtain more satisfactory results in patient compliance and function recovery because of minimally invasive surgery.

Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries

Acromioclavicular joint injury is common in young individuals who suffer direct trauma to the shoulder. Treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation is controversial with regards to the indication of operative management, timing of surgery, whether to perform open or arthroscopic surgery, method of stabilisation (rigid or non-rigid) and type of graft used for repair or reconstruction. Current evidence supports conservative management for Rockwood types I and II, while types IV, V and VI benefit from surgery. The optimal management of type III injuries in high demand patients remains contentious. Surgical options include acromioclavicular fixation, coracoclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Few studies with a low level of evidence suggest arthroscopic techniques and anatomical ligament reconstruction have better outcomes when compared to older techniques of rigid coracoclavicular fixation. The aim of this article is to look at the current evidence and address these controversial issues.

Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS

Due to high rate of persisting dynamic posterior translation (DPT) following isolated coracoclavicular double-button technique for reconstruction of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint reported in the literature, an additional acromioclavicular cerclage was added to the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients with high-grade AC-joint instability treated with a double TightRope technique with an additional percutaneous acromioclavicular cerclage.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients (6 f/53 m; median age 38.3 (range 21.5-63.4 years) who sustained an acute high-grade AC-joint dislocation (Rockwood type V) were treated using the above-mentioned technique. At the final follow-up, the constant score (CS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV), the Taft score (TF) and the acromioclavicular joint instability score (ACJI) as well as bilateral anteroposterior stress views with 10 kg of axial load and bilateral modified Alexander views were obtained.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 26.4 (range 20.3-61.0) months, 34 patients scored a median of 90 (33-100) points in the CS, 90 (25-100) % in the SSV, 11 (4-12) points in the TF and 87 (43-100) points in the ACJI. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance was 12.1 (6.5-19.8) mm and the CC difference 2.0 (0.0-11.0) mm. Two patients (5.8%) showed a complete DPT of the AC joint, and fourteen patients (41.1%) displayed a partial DPT. The overall revision rate was 11.7%. Two patients presented implant irritation, one patient a recurrent instability, and one patient suffered from a local infection.

CONCLUSION

The arthroscopically assisted and image-intensifier-controlled double TightRope technique with an additional percutaneous acromioclavicular cerclage leads to good and excellent clinical results after a follow-up of 2 years. The incidence of persisting dynamic horizontal translation is lower compared to isolated coracoclavicular stabilization. Thus, we recommend using the double TightRope implant with an additional acromioclavicular cerclage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries

Surgical management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries should be focused on realigning the torn ends of the ligaments to allow for healing potential. The most widely utilized treatment methods incorporate the use of metal hardware, which can alter the biomechanics of the acromioclavicular joint. This leads to a second surgical procedure for hardware removal once the ligaments have healed. Patients with unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries managed with arthroscopy-assisted procedures have shown good and excellent clinical outcomes, without the need for a second operation. These procedures incorporate a coracoclavicular suspension device aimed to function as an internal brace, narrowing the coracoclavicular space thus allowing for healing of the torn coracoclavicular ligaments. The lesser morbidity of a minimally invasive approach and the possibility to diagnose and treat concomitant intraarticular injuries; no obligatory implant removal, and the possibility of having a straight visualization of the inferior aspect of the base of the coracoid (convenient when placing coracoclavicular fixation systems) are the main advantages of the arthroscopic approach over classic open procedures. This article consists on a narrative review of the literature in regard to the management of acute acromioclavicular joint instability.

Horizontal and Vertical Stabilization of Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Arthroscopy-Assisted

We describe the technical aspects of an arthroscopy-assisted procedure indicated for the management of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries, consisting of a synthetic augmentation of both the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments, that anatomically reproduces the coracoclavicular biomechanics and offers fixation that keeps the torn ends of the ligaments facing one another, thus allowing healing of the native structures without the need for a second surgical procedure for metal hardware removal.

Coronal plane radiographic evaluation of the single TightRope technique in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injury

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to demonstrate the technical aspects of the single TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) procedure for acute acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular joint dislocation, identify the predictive factors influencing its outcome, and assess and validate the significance of specific radiologic parameters.

METHODS

We reviewed true anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 62 consecutive patients who had undergone surgical reconstruction using TightRope for an acute acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular injury. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months between October 2009 and March 2012 and were divided into dissociated or nondissociated groups according to their surgical outcome. We measured the clavicle tunnel anteroposterior angle, distal clavicular tunnel placement, and tunnel-to-medial coracoid ratio, and compared the parameters in each group after a satisfactory intraclass correlation coefficient reliability test result.

RESULTS

The angles of patients in the dissociated group were more acute compared with the angles of those in the nondissociated group, which were perpendicular, as verified statistically using the paired t test. The difference in the distal clavicular tunnel placement and tunnel-to-medial coracoid ratio between the groups was not significant. Therefore, tunnel placement is not influenced by coracoclavicular dissociation.

CONCLUSIONS

The clavicle tunnel anteroposterior angle can be used as a predictor of surgical outcome in coracoclavicular augmentation surgery. The surgeon should strive to place a perpendicular hole from the clavicle to the coracoid process for the TightRope fixation to enable a successful reconstruction of the acute acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular injury.

[Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures]

BACKGROUND

A variety of surgical procedure are desrcibed for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC-) joint injuries. Beside open techniques arthroscopic assisted procedures spread widely. Each surgical technique offers advantages and disadvantages, but none is currently accepted as a gold standard. Therefore, the study aims to review the evidence for arthroscopic and open surgical procedures in the treatment of acute AC joint instabilities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

According to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions we conducted a defined search of Medline and Embase database for articles publisher over the last ten years.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 961 studies of which 32 were included in this review and 3 studies were suitable for a meta-analysis. The functional outcome (Constant score) showed a tendency towards better results after arthroscopic procedures (weighted mean difference 5.60, 95% confidence interval 0.36-10.64). There were no significant differences with respect to complication rates, secondary dislocation in the vertical plane, revision surgery and AC joint instability.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to inform the surgical management of acute AC joint instability. Due to inconsistent study designs there is no evidence for a general superiority of any of the open or arthroscopic procedures. Randomized, controlled studies are necessary to demonstrate whether arthroscopic techniques show a potential benefit in terms of a better functional outcome.

Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature

Purpose

Over the past decade, a number of arthroscopic or arthroscopically assisted reconstruction techniques have emerged for the management of acromioclavicular (AC) separations. These techniques provide the advantage of superior visualization of the base of the coracoid, less soft tissue dissection, and smaller incisions. While these techniques have been reported to provide excellent functional results with minimal complications, discrepancies exist within the literature. This systematic review aims to assess the rate of complications following these procedures.

Methods

Two independent reviewers completed a search of Medline, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library entries up to December 2013. The terms “Acromioclavicular Joint (MeSH)” OR “acromioclavicular* (text)” OR “coracoclavicular* (text)” AND “Arthroscopy (MeSH)” OR “Arthroscop* (text)” were used. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated assuming a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic.

Level of evidence

IV

Results

A total of 972 abstracts met the search criteria. After removal of duplicates and assessment of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 12 articles were selected for data extraction. The rate of superficial infection was 3.8% and residual shoulder/AC pain or hardware irritation occurred at a rate of 26.7%. The rate of coracoid/clavicle fracture was 5.3% and occurred most commonly with techniques utilizing bony tunnels. Loss of AC joint reduction occurred in 26.8% of patients.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic AC reconstruction techniques carry a distinct complication profile. The TightRope/Endobutton techniques, when performed acutely, provide good radiographic outcomes at the expense of hardware irritation. In contrast, graft reconstructions in patients with chronic AC separations demonstrated a high risk for loss of reduction. Fractures of the coracoid/clavicle remain a significant complication occurring predominately with techniques utilizing bony tunnels.

Anatomic reconstruction of chronic coracoclavicular ligament tears: arthroscopic-assisted approach with nonrigid mechanical fixation and graft augmentation

It has recently been suggested that all coracoclavicular ligament tears could be considered for surgery because nonoperative management might result in irreversible changes in the scapular position that could lead to muscle kinematic alterations that would perturb the shoulder girdle function and result in pain. In this technical note we describe an anatomic technique for the treatment of chronic coracoclavicular ligament tears that overcomes the issues related to open surgery, metal hardware, the inferior resistance to secondary displacement of only grafting and nonanatomic techniques, and the saw effect and anterior loop translation that can be seen in systems that surround the base of the coracoid. Our technique incorporates the use of a tendon graft and a nonrigid mechanical stabilizer that protects the graft from stretching during the process of healing and integration into bone, guaranteeing the maintenance of a reduced acromioclavicular joint.

Associated lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in grade 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of associated pathologic shoulder lesions that were addressed surgically in grade 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations, as well as to compare this incidence between younger and older patients and between acute and chronic cases.

METHODS

In this multicenter nonrandomized retrospective study, 98 patients operated on for grade 3 ACJ dislocation underwent concomitant arthroscopic evaluation for the identification and treatment of any associated lesions. The type and treatment of associated lesions were collected in a central database and analyzed. We classified patients according to age (<45 years and ≥ 45 years) and according to the length of time between trauma and surgical treatment (≤ 30 days and ≥ 120 days), obtaining the following stratification: younger acute, older acute, younger chronic, and older chronic.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 42 (42.8%) were diagnosed with at least 1 additional pathologic lesion, and 29 (29.5%) required a dedicated additional treatment. Rates of treatment on associated lesions were analyzed: younger versus older groups presented a significant difference, as did younger acute versus older acute groups; SLAP and posterior rotator cuff tear treatments represented 24 of the 35 additional surgeries (68.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of associated pathologic lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in patients with ACJ dislocation was 29.5%. Patients aged 45 years or older had a greater risk of presenting with associated lesions that needed to be surgically addressed (odds ratio, 3.01). The overall rates of associated surgical lesions in acute versus chronic cases were not shown to be significantly different.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic case series.

[Arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: comparison of clinical and radiological results of single versus double TightRope™ technique]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the results of the single (STR) versus double TightRope™ (DTR) technique for stabilisation of acute separations of the AC joint with the hypothesis that DTR achieves lower CC distance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 29 consecutive patients treated operatively with the TR technique (mean age 38.1 years, n=26 male) were analysed in a cohort study with a mean follow-up of 13.3 months (12.0-21.7). Acute AC joint separations types III and V according to Rockwood (R) were included; R types I, II, IV and VI were excluded. The prospective scores determined pre-op and 3, 6 and 12 months post-op and X-rays were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the patients 12 suffered an R type III and 17 an R V separation; 14 were treated with STR and 15 with DTR. With STR, 8 R III and 6 R V injuries and with DTR 4 R III and 11 R V injuries were treated arthroscopically. STR achieved an increased CC distance >125% compared to the contralateral AC joint in five cases (36%). Two of them occurred as R V and three as R III injury. DTR achieved a CC distance >125% in two cases of an R V injury (13%).

CONCLUSION

The DTR technique provides lower CC distance compared to the STR technique, without a significant difference of CC distance and scores.

[Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of 37 consecutive patients (Ø age 37.9; 4♀, 33♂) following arthroscopically assisted and image intensifier-controlled AC joint reconstruction using the double TightRope™ technique for acute AC joint separations grade V according to Rockwood.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After 12 months 30 patients with a mean age of 38.8 years (range 18.6-65.8 years) could be included. The postoperative assessment included the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Constant Score (CS), and Taft Score (TF) as well as radiological evaluation using bilateral stress views and bilateral Alexander views for determining vertical and horizontal AC joint instability.

RESULTS

The clinical scores reached 91.4±9.8% for SSV, 87.8±5.2 for CS, and 10.1±2.1 points for TF. The initial coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was 22.1±5.6 mm and could be reduced to 8.6±2.8 mm postoperatively (p<0.05). The CCD increased at final follow-up to 12.8±2.4 mm. The difference of the CCD compared to the contralateral side was initially 13.7±4.8 mm; postoperatively it was 0.3±3.0 mm with an increase at final follow-up to 3.6±3.5 mm. A posterior instability on the Alexander view occurred in 53.3% of patients. A correlation between inferior clinical results and horizontal instability could be detected. Only one patient was slightly tender to palpation at the AC joint.

CONCLUSION

Following arthroscopic AC joint stabilization using the double TightRope™ technique, despite partial recurrent instability, favorable clinical results can be expected.

Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries represent a common injury to the shoulder girdle. In the management algorithm of acute ACJ injuries complete radiological evaluation represents the key to a successful therapy. According to the classification of Rockwood the presence of a horizontal component in addition to vertical instability has to be detected. Using axillary functional views or Alexander views dynamic horizontal ACJ instability can be diagnosed in a simple, efficient and cost-effective manner reducing the number of mis-/underdiagnosed ACJ injuries. MRI should not be the imaging modality of first choice. The treatment of ACJ dislocations must consider two aspects. In addition to the correct type of injury therapy strategies should be adapted to patient's demands and compliance. Low grade AC injuries types I and II are treated non-operatively in terms of "skilful-neglect". High-grade injuries types IV-VI should be treated operatively within a time frame of 2-3 weeks after injury. A certain debate is still ongoing regarding type III injuries. Out from the literature, non-operative treatment of type III injuries results to provide at least equal functional outcomes as compared to surgical treatment associated with less complications and earlier return to professional and sports activities. If surgical treatment is indicated, open surgical procedures using pins, PDS-slings or hook plates are still widely used concurring with recently raising minimally invasive, arthroscopic techniques using new implants designed to remain in situ. Combined coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular repair are gaining in importance to restore horizontal as well as vertical ACJ stability.

Prevalence and pattern of glenohumeral injuries among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities

BACKGROUND

With increasing numbers of arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization procedures has come an increase in reports of concomitant glenohumeral injuries among AC joint separations. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence, pattern, and cause of glenohumeral pathologies among a large patient population with acute high-grade AC joint instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 125 patients (13 women, 112 men) with high-grade AC joint dislocation (6 Rockwood II; 119 Rockwood V) underwent diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy before AC joint repair. Pathologic lesions were evaluated for acute or degenerative origin and, if considered relevant, treated all-arthroscopically.

RESULTS

Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies were found in 38 of 125 patients (30.4%). Analysis of pathogenesis distinguished different patterns of accompanying injuries: acute intra-articular lesions, related to the recent shoulder trauma, were found in 9 patients (7.2%), degenerative lesions, considered to be unrelated to the recent trauma, were found in 18 (14.4%), and 11 (8.8%) had an unclear traumatic correlation (intermediate group). Within the acute and the degenerative group, affected structures were predominantly partial, articular-sided tears of the anterosuperior rotator cuff, including instabilities of the pulley complex, followed by pathologies of the long head of the biceps and superior labrum anteroposterior lesions. The intermediate group presented mainly with articular-sided partial tears of the subscapularis tendon.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study showed a high prevalence (30%) of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies, of which some indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open AC repair. Hence, the arthroscopic approach for AC joint stabilization allows for the diagnosis and treatment of associated intra-articular pathologies.

Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome following surgical treatment of type III acute acromioclavicular dislocations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome (defined as scapular malposition, infero-medial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition, and dyskinesis of scapular movement) in patients treated surgically for acute type III AC dislocation.

METHODS

Development of scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome following conservative treatment has been described in the literature. In the present study, we evaluated 34 patients treated with different surgical techniques for acute type III AC dislocations. Functional outcome, radiographic evaluation of clavicular reduction and scapular kinematics were all evaluated.

RESULTS

Scapular dyskinesis was observed in only 4 (11.7%) patients, of which only 1 (2.9% of the sample) was affected by SICK scapula syndrome. Scapular dyskinesis was classified as type I in 3 cases (75%) and type III in 1 case (25%). Constant shoulder scores (mean 95.7 points, SD ± 5.3) and Simple Shoulder Test results (mean 11.2 points, SD ± 0.8) were excellent. Recurrence of separation was observed in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of type III acute AC joint dislocations is associated with a lower incidence of scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome, if compared to data reported in the literature on conservative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, Level IV.

Midterm results of combined acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular reconstruction using nylon tape

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiologic and functional outcomes of an anatomic reconstruction of both acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments in types III to V AC injuries using nylon tape and no metal hardware.

METHODS

A prospective case-series study was performed on 17 cases with types III to V AC injuries treated by anatomic reconstruction of the AC ligaments (anterior and superior) and CC ligaments (conoid and trapezoid) using nylon tape and no metal hardware. Clinical assessments, radiologic findings, and visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant scores were recorded for all patients. After a minimum postoperative period of 2 years, all cases were re-evaluated and rescored.

RESULTS

The case-series study comprised 17 cases with types III to V AC injuries. After a mean follow-up period of 28 months (minimum, 24 months), the patients had a significantly improved mean visual analog scale score (from 6.4 to 2.4 points), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (from 25 to 81.7 points), and Constant score (from 21 to 85 points), with overall 88.2% satisfaction. Radiographic superior displacement showed reduction from 13 to 2 mm whereas posterior displacement showed reduction from 5 to 2 mm, and both were statistically significant (P < .05). The rate of return to the patients' preinjury jobs was 82.4%, and there was 1 case of recurrent subluxation.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined anatomic reconstruction of both AC and CC ligaments using nylon tape by the described technique provides overall 88.2% satisfaction, 94% radiologic reduction, and a low complication rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Evaluation of arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation using the TightRope system

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TightRope system (Arthrex, Naples, Florida). Between January 2006 and May 2007, ten shoulders in 10 patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types IV and V) underwent arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint stabilization using the TightRope. Average patient age was 30 years (range, 22-42 years), and mean follow-up was 24 months (range, 18-30 months). Follow-up occurred at 2 and 6 weeks, 3 months, and then every 6 months postoperatively. The shoulders were evaluated radiologically by comparing the acromioclavicular joint with the normal side and clinically by assessing the pain, function, and range of joint motion using the Constant score.Ten patients returned to work without pain 10 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Average Constant score was 96.3 (range, 94-99) at last follow-up. Because of technical error, 1 patient experienced TightRope fixation failure on the coracoid side, and the acromioclavicular joint was redislocated, which was treated by an open technique. The 10 patients were satisfied with their functional results and cosmetic appearance.The arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TightRope is a minimally invasive surgical technique that has been proven effective for the treatment of these lesions. It is characterized by less morbidity, less hospitalization, excellent cosmoses, and early rehabilitation.

[Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation]

During the past few years arthroscopic and minimal invasive techniques for stabilization of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations have gained increasing interest. Well established procedures for open surgery were modified and implemented to attain an arthroscopic level. Furthermore implants were developed which enable these reconstructive techniques to be performed arthroscopically without the disadvantages of open procedures. The short to mid-term results described so far concerning the clinical and radiological outcome of arthroscopic stabilization techniques show an at least equal outcome to those presented in open surgery.

Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomical reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations

BACKGROUND

To achieve reduction of an acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation, novel procedures aim to provide stability and function by restoring the coracoclavicular anatomy.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomical reconstruction for acute AC joint disruption using 2 flip-button devices results in satisfactory clinical function and provides a stable fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The outcome of 23 consecutive patients (21 men, 2 women; mean age, 37.5 +/- 10.2 years; range, 21-59 years) who underwent anatomical reduction for an acute AC joint dislocation using 2 flip-button devices, each separately replacing 1 coracoclavicular ligament, was evaluated clinically and radiographically preoperatively and 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The evaluation included a visual analog scale for pain, the Constant score, the simple shoulder test, and the Short Form-36. An additional 7 patients had similar surgery during the same period, but 4 were lost to follow-up, 2 required surgical revision, and 1 developed postoperative infection.

RESULTS

There were 3 Rockwood type III, 3 type IV, and 17 type V separations. Mean follow-up was 30.6 +/- 5.4 months (range, 24-40 months). The visual analog scale and Constant score showed significant improvements from preoperative 4.5 +/- 1.9 (range, 1-7) and 34.3 +/- 6.9 (range, 22-44) to postoperative 0.25 +/- 0.5 (range, 0-1) and 94.3 +/- 3.2 (range, 88-98) at 24 months, respectively. Postoperative radiographic AC joint alignment was unsatisfactory in 8 cases, either in the coronal, axillary, or both planes, with no different clinical outcome when compared with the remaining patients.

CONCLUSION

Immediate anatomical reduction of an acute AC separation with flip-button devices provides satisfactory clinical results at intermediate-term follow-up. This technique should be performed by an experienced arthroscopist; tunnel and button placement are of utmost importance to avoid postoperative failure or loss of reduction.

Prevalence of concomitant intraarticular lesions in patients treated operatively for high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of concomitant intraarticular lesions to the glenohumeral joint or to surrounding soft tissue structures with non-randomized prospective case series. High-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations result from direct or indirect force impact to the shoulder girdle. Fourty consecutive patients (2 female, 38 male) with high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations (Rockwood III: n = 3; IV: n = 3; V: n = 34) who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy at the time of acromioclavicular joint repair were evaluated. Associated pathologic lesions were documented and treated by an all-arthroscopic approach. As a result, traumatic intraarticular lesions were found in 15% (n = 6/40) of cases. Two patients had an isolated partial tear of the subscapularis tendon. One patient had a combined tear of the subscapularis and supraspinatus tendon (PASTA type lesion). Two patients showed a type II SLAP-lesion and one patient had a type VI SLAP-lesion. Arthroscopic treatment included rotator cuff reconstruction in two cases and debridement of the partially torn tendon in one case. Two patients underwent an arthroscopic SLAP-repair and in one patient a debridement of a labral flap tear was performed. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction was achieved via an open technique using suture anchors in 14 cases and via an all-arthroscopic approach using a double Tight-rope technique in 26 cases. To conclude, in number of cases, high-grade AC-separations may be associated with traumatic concomitant glenohumeral pathologies resulting from the same trauma impact to the shoulder girdle. A combined or an all-arthroscopic approach allows to accurately diagnose and treat associated intraarticular pathologies.

Acromioclavicular joint problems in athletes and new methods of management

The acromioclavicular (AC) complex consists of bony and ligamentous structures that stabilize the upper extremity through the scapula to the axial skeleton. The AC joint pathology in the athlete is generally caused by 1 of 3 processes: trauma (fracture, AC joint separation, or dislocation); AC joint arthrosis (posttraumatic or idiopathic); or distal clavicle osteolysis. This article presents systematically the relevant anatomy, classification, evaluation, and treatment of these disorders. Management of AC joint problems is dictated by the severity and chronicity of the injury, and the patient's needs and expectations.

Arthroscopic fixation of a type II-variant, unstable distal clavicle fracture

This article describes a case of a patient with a type II-variant, unstable distal clavicle fracture that was successfully treated with a novel arthroscopic technique using the Tightrope system (Arthrex, Naples, Florida). The arthroscope was placed into the anterolateral portal after a bursectomy was performed. An anterior portal was made lateral to the coracoid using superficial landmarks and arthroscopic visualization. A radiofrequency device was inserted through the anterior portal. Following the coracoacromial ligament medially, the radiofrequency device was used to first tactilely then visually identify the coracoid base. An anterior cruciate ligament guide was inserted through the anterior portal and placed inferior to the base of the coracoid. The guide pin sleeve was placed medial to the fractured clavicle perpendicular to the coracoid. A small incision was made and a guide pin was drilled through the clavicle and through the coracoid under arthroscopic visualization. A cannulated drill was used to drill a hole through the clavicle into the base of the coracoid. A looped guide wire was inserted through the cannulated drill, passed out of the hole drilled in the coracoid, and retrieved through the anterior cannula. The drill was removed, leaving the guide wire in place. The Tightrope was inserted into the looped guide wire and pulled first through the clavicle and then the coracoid. Once the inferior button was pulled out of the coracoid drill hole, the button was deployed to anchor it under the inferior coracoid. With the fracture held reduced, the Tightrope was tied down over the superior clavicle, obtaining reduction and fixation of the distal clavicle fracture. Fracture consolidation was confirmed at 3 months, and the patient returned to painless, unrestricted activity at 5 months.

Arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for chronic acromioclavicular joint instability

The treatment of symptomatic chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations can be challenging. Different surgical procedures have been described in the literature. We present an arthroscopically assisted stabilization using a gracilis tendon transclavicular-transcoracoid loop technique augmented with a Tight-Rope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). In contrast to the classic Weaver-Dunn procedures this technique is designed to stabilize the acromioclavicular joint by recreating the anatomy of the coracoclavicular ligaments via a minimal invasive approach.

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are common but underdiagnosed. Sprains and minor subluxations are best managed conservatively, but there is debate concerning the treatment of complete dislocations and the more complex combined injuries in which other elements of the shoulder girdle are damaged. Confusion has been caused by existing systems for classification of these injuries, the plethora of available operative techniques and the lack of well-designed clinical trials comparing alternative methods of management. Recent advances in arthroscopic surgery have produced an even greater variety of surgical options for which, as yet, there are no objective data on outcome of high quality. We review the current concepts of the treatment of these injuries.

A modified technique of arthroscopically assisted AC joint reconstruction and preliminary results

Surgical treatment of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations has become analogous to ligament reconstructions elsewhere in the body with the goal being restoration of the native anatomy. Circumferential access to the base of the coracoid is essential to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligament complex. Using some of the traditional open approaches, this access requires detaching the deltoid insertion and performing extensive soft tissue dissection. Also, poor visualization risks injury to nearby neurovascular structures. An arthroscopically assisted reconstruction offers the advantage of less soft tissue dissection and superior visualization to the base of the coracoid. We have developed a unique arthroscopically assisted technique that uses a subacromial approach to pass suture material and a tendon graft around the coracoid to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligament complex. We describe our technique and preliminary results in 10 patients who have undergone coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for high-grade AC separation. All patients improved subjectively with regard to pain and function at a minimum followup of 3 months (mean, 5 months; range, 3-18 months). This arthroscopically assisted technique has the potential to allow for safe and at least in the short term reliable restoration of the coracoclavicular ligament complex and provides an alternative technique to treat AC joint separations.

Methods of operative fixation of the acromio-clavicular joint: a biomechanical comparison

PURPOSE

Three different methods of fixation used in acute disruption of the acromio-clavicular (AC) joint-namely, the coraco-clavicular Bosworth screw (CC Screw), a coraco-clavicular sling of Mersilene #5 tape (CC Sling), and a Hook Plate-were compared to baseline to see which could most closely replicate the stiffness of healthy cadaveric AC specimens (Intact).

HYPOTHESIS

It is hypothesized that the Hook Plate method, as compared with the other reconstructions tested, will be most similar mechanically to the intact AC joint with respect to present outcome measures.

METHODS

Five matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested. Stiffness was tested with superior cyclic loads to 70 N. The stiffness for each specimen was initially tested with all the ligaments in place (Intact). The AC and CC ligaments were then sectioned, and stiffness was tested, in varying order, with reconstructions using the CC Screw, the CC Sling, and the Hook Plate. Failure testing consisted of taking either the CC Screw or Hook Plate to failure within each matched pair.

RESULTS

The CC Screw and the CC Sling, respectively, showed stiffnesses of 46 +/- 23 N/mm and 15 +/- 8 N/mm, which was significantly different from the Intact specimen (P < 0.05). The Hook Plate had a stiffness of 26 +/- 17 N/mm, most comparable to the Intact joint stiffness of 25 +/- 8 N/mm (P = 0.785). With failure testing, the CC Screw failed at a significantly higher load than the Hook Plate (744 +/- 184 N vs 459 +/- 188 N) (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The CC Screw demonstrated the greatest stiffness with repetitive loading to 70 N. The Hook Plate had a stiffness most similar to the normal physiologic state of the AC joint. The CC Sling was significantly less stiff than the Intact joint or the other methods of fixation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the stiffest construct is the CC Screw, Hook Plate fixation allows physiologic motion without pathological deformation and most closely resembles the stiffness of the native AC joint for the current test procedure used.

[Arthroscopic surgery of the acromioclavicular joint.]

Lesion of the acromioclavicular joint is a usual clinical condition because of it superficial situation. It is often involved in trauma of the shoulder girdle. Moreover, degenerative changes are quite always observed for patients over 40. Distal clavicle resection as a treatment of acromioclavicular joint disease had been first described in 1941. Clinical results in term of mobility and shoulder pain are good and durable in time. Referring to the expansion arthroscopic techniques, distal clavicle resection lead to same middle and long term results as open surgery. Arthroscopic procedures have the theoretical advantages of no deltoid disruption and may help the surgeon to diagnose and treat associated lesions such as rotator cuff ruptures. More recently, arthroscopic surgeries for fresh and/or chronic acromioclavicular disjunctions were proposed. These procedures remain in development and need further evaluations.

Arthroscopic treatment of fractures of the radial head

An original technique for the arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment of the fractures of the radial head is proposed and described. The elbow arthroscopy is started with a 4.5-mm 30 degrees arthroscope from the proximal anteromedial portal and the anterior elbow is examined; then a proximal anterolateral portal is created and a full-radius blade inserted to take out the hematoma and to allow visualization of the radial head that is explored through the whole range of motion to visualize the fracture fragment. The fragment is manipulated by means of arthroscopic tools to reduce the anteromedial surface of the radial head. The arthroscope is now switched to the posterolateral portal and the posterior aspect of the humeral radial joint is visualized. The soft spot portal is used to insert a periosteal elevator to complete the reduction and firmly hold the fragment in the reduced position. An anterolateral portal is now created to allow the safe insertion of a guidewire, angled 45 degrees to the longitudinal axis of the radius, to pierce the fragment with. A 14-mm long cannulated screw is inserted along the guide after specific drilling. Finally, the reduction and the stability of the fixation are checked with during full rotation of the elbow. The described procedure has been performed in 6 patients. Short-term preliminary results show a satisfactory functional outcome. Among the advantages of the technique are the minimally invasive approach, the direct visualization of the fracture, and the benefits derived from the radiation-free procedure.

Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint reconstruction

Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint reconstruction avoids the large incisions necessary with open reconstructions. This acromioclavicular joint reconstruction technique via the subacromial space does not violate the rotator interval or require screw removal. The patient is placed in a modified beach-chair position. The arthroscope is placed into the subacromial space, and a bursectomy is performed through a lateral subacromial portal. The coracoacromial ligament is released from the acromion with an electrocautery and an arthroscopic elevator. A nonabsorbable suture is passed through the coracoacromial ligament with a suture passer, and an arthroscopic suture grasper is used to deliver both ends of the suture out through the lateral portal. The coracoid is identified and isolated using a radiofrequency ablator placed through the anterior portal while visualizing through the lateral portal. A percutaneous shuttle device is passed through the skin superomedial to the coracoid. The shuttle is visualized entering superior to the coracoid and is passed just medial to the coracoid. Once the tip of the shuttle can be visualized in the recess inferior to the coracoid, the shuttle loop is advanced. A suture grasper is used to deliver both ends of the shuttle out through the anterior portal. A semitendinosus allograft is used to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligament. A nonabsorbable suture is passed through both ends of the allograft. Three strands of nonabsorbable suture are braided together. The tendon and the braided suture are shuttled around the coracoid. At this point, both the braided suture and the allograft tendon enter the anterior portal, wrap around the coracoid base, and exit the anterior portal. A 3-cm incision is made over the distal clavicle. A hole is drilled through the clavicle with a 5-mm drill. A loop of 22-gauge wire is passed through the hole in the clavicle, and a looped suture is shuttled through the hole. A curved clamp is used to create a tunnel from the acromioclavicular joint, under the deltoid, to the anterior portal. The ends of the braided suture and the tendon sutures are grasped by the clamp and pulled out the acromioclavicular joint incision. The limbs of the braided suture and the tendon suture that pass medial to the coracoid are shuttled through the hole in the clavicle using the looped suture that was previously passed through the clavicle. The acromioclavicular joint is reduced by pushing down on the distal clavicle with a bone tamp while simultaneously lifting the acromion upward by superiorly loading the humerus at the elbow. Once the acromioclavicular joint is reduced or slightly over-reduced, the braided suture is tied down securely. The acromioclavicular joint should remain reduced even after the manual reduction maneuver is released. The semitendinosus allograft is tensioned around the distal end of the clavicle and sutured to itself with a nonabsorbable suture. The released coracoacromial ligament is retrieved from the clavicular incision and sutured to the distal clavicle and semitendinosus allograft. The incision is closed in standard fashion, and a sling is applied.

Eine neue minimal-invasive arthroskopische Technik zur Akromioklavikulargelenkrekonstruktion

BACKGROUND

Over 100 techniques for acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) reconstruction have been described. Most of these techniques are invasive and are associated with a high complication rate. We therefore developed a new minimally invasive arthroscopic technique for reconstruction of the ACJ.

METHODS

The new operation technique is described in detail. We operated 13 patients with Rockwood IV or V dislocations of the ACJ using this new technique. Intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. Each patient was evaluated after 3, 6, and 9 months using the Constant score for shoulder function and radiographs (anteroposterior, axillary, and Zanca views) of the operated and nonoperated shoulder for radiologic evaluation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the first clinical results and complication rates using this technique.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 9 months. Of the 13 patients, 12 could be included in the study and we had 1 dropout. The mean Constant score was 97; all patients were satisfied with the postoperative shoulder function and cosmetics. Radiologically we observed ten patients with anatomic reduction and two with a subluxation between 2 and 4 mm compared to the nonoperated side. In one patient we determined coracoclavicular ossifications which were asymptomatic. There were no complications intra- and postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

These first results suggest that this is a good and safe technique for ACJ reconstruction. Further randomized studies with more patients have to follow to confirm the results.