1
|
Minkus M, Aigner A, Wolke J, Scheibel M. All-Suture Anchor vs. Knotless Suture Anchor for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability-A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1381. [PMID: 38592204 PMCID: PMC10934154 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
All-suture or soft-anchors (SA) represent a new generation of suture anchor technology with a completely suture-based system. This study's objective was to assess Juggerknot® SA, for arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder instability (RSI), and to compare it to a commonly performed knotless anchor (KA) technique (Pushlock®). In a prospective cohort study, 30 consecutive patients scheduled for reconstruction of the capsulolabral complex without substantial glenoid bone loss were included and operated on using the SA technique. A historical control group was operated on using the KA technique for the same indication. Clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RSI and WOSI at 24 months were the co-primary endpoints, evaluated with logistic and linear regression. A total of 5 out of 30 (16.7%) patients suffered from RSI in the SA group, one out of 31 (3.2%) in the KA group (adjusted odds ratio = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35), and 13.3% in the SA group and 3.2% in the KAgroup had a revision. The median WOSI in the SA group was lower than in the KA group (81% vs. 95%) (adjusted regression coefficient = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35). Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for RSI using either the SA or KA technique led to satisfying clinical outcomes. However, there is a tendency for higher RSI and lower WOSI following the SA technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.M.)
| | - Annette Aigner
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Wolke
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.M.)
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (M.M.)
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baum C, Audigé L, Stojanov T, Müller SA, Candrian C, Müller AM, Rosso C, Fankhauser L, Willscheid G, Moroder P, Akgün D, Danzinger V, Gebauer H, Imiolczyk JP, Karpinski K, Lacheta L, Minkus M, Paksoy A, Samaniego E, Thiele K, Weiss I, Suter T, Müller-Lebschi J, Mueller S, Saner M, Haag-Schumacher C, Tamborrini-Schütz G, Trong MLD, Buitrago-Tellez C, Hasler J, Riede U, Weber S, Moor B, Biner M, Fournier S, Gallusser N, Marietan D, Pawlak S, Spormann C, Hansen B, Mamisch N, Durchholz H, Bräm J, Cunningham G, Kourhani A, Ossipow S, Simao P, Lädermann A, Egli R, Erdbrink S, Flückiger R, Lombardo P, Pinworasarn T, Scacchi P, Weihs J, Zumstein M, Flury M, Berther R, Ehrmann C, Hübscher L, Schwappach D, Eid K, Bensler S, Fritz Y, Grünberger N, Kriechling P, Langthaler D, Niehaus R, Nobs R, Benninger E, de Groot Q, Doert A, Ebert S, Grimm P, Mottier F, Pisan M, Schätz J, Schwank A, Wiedenbach J, Scheibel M, Audigé L, Bellmann F, Brune D, de Jong M, Diermayr S, Endell D, Etter M, Freislederer F, Gkikopoulos N, Glanzmann M, Grobet C, Jung C, Moro F, Moroder P, Ringer R, Schätz J, Schwyzer HK, Weber B, Wehrli M, Wirth B, Nötzli M, Franz A, Oswald J, Steiger B, Ameziane Y, Child C, Spagna G, Candrian C, Del Grande F, Feltri P, Filardo G, Marbach F, Schönweger F, Jost B, Badulescu M, Lüscher S, Napieralski F, Öhrström L, Olach M, Rechsteiner J, Scheler J, Spross C, Zdravkovic V, Zumstein MA, Chlasta A, Gerber K, Hayoz A, Müller-Lebschi J, Schuster F, Wieser K, Borbas P, Bouaicha S, Camenzind R, Catanzaro S, Gerber C, Grubhofer F, Hasler A, Hochreiter B, Marcus R, Selman F, Sutter R, Wyss S, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Aghlmandi S, Ahlborn I, Baum C, Eckers F, Grezda K, Hatz S, Hunziker S, Stojanov T, Taha M, Tamborrini-Schütz G, Mueller AM. Functional and Radiologic Outcomes of Degenerative Versus Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Supraspinatus Tendon. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:441-450. [PMID: 38259113 PMCID: PMC10838469 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231219253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is among the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Several factors-including age, sex, and tear severity-have been identified as predictors for outcome after repair. The influence of the tear etiology on functional and structural outcome remains controversial. PURPOSE To investigate the influence of tear etiology (degenerative vs traumatic) on functional and structural outcomes in patients with supraspinatus tendon tears. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Patients undergoing ARCR from 19 centers were prospectively enrolled between June 2020 and November 2021. Full-thickness, nonmassive tears involving the supraspinatus tendon were included. Tears were classified as degenerative (chronic shoulder pain, no history of trauma) or traumatic (acute, traumatic onset, no previous shoulder pain). Range of motion, strength, the Subjective Shoulder Value, the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) were assessed before (baseline) and 6 and 12 months after ARCR. The Subjective Shoulder Value and the OSS were also determined at the 24-month follow-up. Repair integrity after 12 months was documented, as well as additional surgeries up to the 24-month follow-up. Tear groups were compared using mixed models adjusted for potential confounding effects. RESULTS From a cohort of 973 consecutive patients, 421 patients (degenerative tear, n = 230; traumatic tear, n = 191) met the inclusion criteria. The traumatic tear group had lower mean baseline OSS and CMS scores but significantly greater score changes 12 months after ARCR (OSS, 18 [SD, 8]; CMS, 34 [SD,18] vs degenerative: OSS, 15 [SD, 8]; CMS, 22 [SD, 15]) (P < .001) and significantly higher 12-month overall scores (OSS, 44 [SD, 5]; CMS, 79 [SD, 9] vs degenerative: OSS, 42 [SD, 7]; CMS, 76 [SD, 12]) (P≤ .006). At the 24-month follow-up, neither the OSS (degenerative, 44 [SD, 6]; traumatic, 45 [SD, 6]; P = .346) nor the rates of repair failure (degenerative, 14 [6.1%]; traumatic 12 [6.3%]; P = .934) and additional surgeries (7 [3%]; 7 [3.7%]; P = .723) differed between groups. CONCLUSION Patients with degenerative and traumatic full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears who had ARCR show satisfactory short-term functional results. Although patients with traumatic tears have lower baseline functional scores, they rehabilitate over time and show comparable clinical results 1 year after ARCR. Similarly, degenerative and traumatic rotator cuff tears show comparable structural outcomes, which suggests that degenerated tendons retain healing potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Baum
- Investigation performed at University Hospital Basel, Basel and the Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Audigé
- Surgical Outcome Research Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Research and Development, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Stojanov
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Research and Development, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian A. Müller
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Candrian
- Trauma and Ortho Unit, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | - Andreas M. Müller
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra Weber
- Hôpital du Valais–Centre Hospitalier du Valais Romand, Martigny, CH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jakob Bräm
- Hirslanden Clinique la Colline, Geneva, CH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Larissa Hübscher
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, CH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sabine Wyss
- University Library Basel, University of Basel, Basel, CH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moroder P, Lacheta L, Minkus M, Gebauer H, Paksoy A, Thiele K, Akgün D. SECEC Didier Patte Prize 2023: the ABC classification of posterior shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024:S1058-2746(24)00020-X. [PMID: 38218406 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ABC classification has recently been proposed as a comprehensive classification system for posterior shoulder instability (PSI). The purpose of this study was to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the ABC classification. METHODS All consecutive patients presenting with unidirectional PSI from June 2019 to June 2021 were included in a prospective study. No patients were excluded, leaving a consecutive series of 100 cases of PSI in 91 patients. All recorded clinical and imaging data were used to create anonymized clinical case vignettes, which were evaluated twice according to the ABC classification at the end of the recruitment period in random sequential order by 4 independent raters (2 experienced shoulder surgeons and 2 orthopedic residents) to analyze the comprehensiveness as well as inter-rater and intrarater reliability of the ABC classification for PSI and to describe differences in characteristics among subtypes. Group A was defined as a first-time singular PSI event <3 months in the past regardless of etiology and is further subdivided into type 1 and type 2 depending on the occurrence of a subluxation (A1) or dislocation (A2). Group B comprises recurrent dynamic PSI regardless of time since onset and is further subdivided by the cause of instability into functional (B1) and structural (B2) dynamic PSI. Group C includes chronic static PSI with posterior humeral decentering that can be either constitutional (C1) or acquired (C2). RESULTS None of the cases was deemed unsuitable to be classified based on the proposed system by the observers. After consensus agreement between the 2 expert raters, 16 cases were attributed to group A (8 type A1 and 8 type A2); 64, to group B (33 type B1 and 31 type B2); and 20, to group C (11 type C1 and 9 type C2). The expert raters agreed on the classification subtypes in 99% and 96% of the cases during the first rating and second rating, respectively (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.998 and 0.99, respectively). The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both raters. The beginners reached the same conclusion as the consensus agreement in 94% of the cases (ICC, 0.99) and 89% of the cases (ICC, 0.97) during the first round and 94% each (ICC, 0.97) during the second round. The intraobserver reliability was excellent for both beginners. Overall, discrepancies between raters were found between groups B1 and B2 (n = 14), groups B2 and C2 (n = 4), groups B1 and C1 (n = 1), and groups A1 and B2 (n = 1). In general, each subtype showed distinctive clinical and imaging characteristics that facilitated the diagnosis. CONCLUSION The presented ABC classification for PSI is a comprehensive classification with a high reliability and reproducibility. However, a gradual transition and potential progression between the subtypes of PSI must be considered. The reliable distinction between different subtypes of PSI based on etiology and pathomechanism provides a standardized basis for future investigations on treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lucca Lacheta
- Department of Sports Orthopedics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henry Gebauer
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alp Paksoy
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathi Thiele
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paksoy A, Akgün D, Moroder P, Scheibel M, Minkus M. Position of scapula and clavicle in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: depressed scapula or elevated distal clavicle? JSES Int 2023; 7:2296-2303. [PMID: 37969526 PMCID: PMC10638563 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Increased coracoclavicular distance due to acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability is often described as a pseudoelevation of the clavicle due to inferior hanging of the scapula, while the distal clavicle remains in its position. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the elevation of the distal clavicle, depression of the scapula, or both are associated with vertical instability and to evaluate the impact of weighted stress radiographs on the clavicle and scapular position in acute ACJ instabilities. Methods The cohort consisted of 505 patients (f = 52, m = 453; mean age 46 years) which presented to our emergency department or outpatient clinic and treated in our institution from 2006 to 2019 displaying an acute ACJ injury. The panorama views that displayed at least two vertebraes with their spinous processes were retrospectively evaluated. Two raters assessed the panorama views twice regarding the clavicular and coracoidal angle of both sides in relation to the cervicothoracal spine and the difference in height of both clavicles and coracoids. Results In our cohort, five types of displacement were distinguished: type A, only clavicle is elevated (N = 46); B, only scapula depressed (N = 36); C, the clavicle elevated and the scapula depressed (N = 67); D, both depressed (N = 133); and E, both elevated (N = 223). 123 patients had non-weighted radiographs and 353 patients stress views with 10 kg of axial load, whereas 29 patients had both radiological modalities. Among these 29 patients, a significant increase in coracoclavicular distance difference, clavicle, and scapula height (P < .05, respectively) was observed, when non-weighted radiographs were compared with weighted. A total of 13 shifts could be observed during the Rockwood type comparison of non-weighted radiographs with the weighted: six from Rockwood type II to III, two from type III to V, and five from type V to type III. Conclusion Acute injury to the ACJ does not exclusively lead to a depression of the scapula or an elevated distal clavicle but rather leads to various vertical displacement combinations, however mostly to the elevation of both structures possibly due to muscle spasm and pain. Comparing both radiological modalities of the same patients, the routine use of weighted views should be questioned, since often a shift of Rockwood stage can be observed might lead to on the one hand inadequate conservative treatment for underestimated injuries however on the other hand unnecessary surgery for overestimated dislocations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alp Paksoy
- Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Markus Scheibel
- Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
- Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Charité University Hospital, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wiethölter M, Akgün D, Plachel F, Minkus M, Karczewski D, Braun K, Thiele K, Becker L, Stöckle U, Moroder P. Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Reliability Assessment of the Established Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Shoulder Fractures. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093168. [PMID: 37176610 PMCID: PMC10179361 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated the reliability and comprehensiveness of the Unified classification system (UCPF), Wright & Cofield, Worland and Kirchhoff classifications and related treatment recommendations for periprosthetic shoulder fractures (PPSFx). Two shoulder arthroplasty specialists (experts) and two orthopaedic residents (non-experts) assessed 20 humeral-sided and five scapula-sided cases of PPSFx. We used the unweighted Cohen's Kappa (κ) for measuring the intra-observer reliability and Krippendorff's alpha (α) for measuring the inter-observer reliability. The inter-rater reliabilities for the Wright & Cofield and Worland classifications were substantial for all groups. The expert and non-expert groups for UCPF also showed substantial inter-rater agreement. The all-rater group for the UCPF and the expert and non-expert group for the Kirchhoff classification revealed moderate inter-rater reliability. For the Kirchhoff classification, only fair inter-rater reliability was found for the non-expert group. Almost perfect intra-rater reliability was measured for all groups of the Wright & Cofield classification and the all-rater and expert groups of the UCPF. All groups of the Kirchhoff and Worland classifications and the group of non-experts for the UCPF had substantial intra-rater reliabilities. Regarding treatment recommendations, substantial inter-rater and moderate intra-rater reliabilities were found. Simple classification systems for PPSFx (Wright & Cofield, Worland) show the highest inter- and intra-observer reliability but lack comprehensiveness as they fail to describe scapula-sided fractures. The complex Kirchhoff classification shows limited reliability. The UCPF seems to offer an acceptable combination of comprehensiveness and reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mats Wiethölter
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Karczewski
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl Braun
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Kathi Thiele
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Becker
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Stöckle
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akgün D, Al-Muhtaresh F, Paksoy A, Lacheta L, Minkus M, Karczewski D, Moroder P. The role of serum D-Dimer for the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:1855-1860. [PMID: 35182199 PMCID: PMC10030413 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04385-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION D-Dimer was recently identified as an additional biomarker in the diagnosis of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, there is only one study in literature dealing with the role of D-Dimer in the diagnosis of shoulder PJI. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to validate the sensitivity and specificity of D-Dimer in detecting shoulder PJI. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients, who underwent septic or aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty in our institution between November 2018 und March 2021, were analyzed. Our cohort consisted of 30 patients, of that 14 (47%) had a shoulder PJI according the last proposed criteria of the International Consensus Meeting. The diagnostic validity of serum D-Dimer regarding the detection of PJI was analyzed. RESULTS The mean D-Dimer level was significantly higher for the patients with shoulder PJI compared to patients with aseptic failure (1.44 ± 1 mg/l vs. 0.76 ± 0.6 mg/l, p = 0.025). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated pathogens, in 9/14 patients (64%), followed by Cutibacterium acnes in 5/14 patients (36%). According to the ROC analysis, a serum D-Dimer threshold of 0.75 mg/l had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 56% for detection of a shoulder PJI. The area under curve was 0.74. A serum C-reactive protein (CRP) cutoff of 10 mg/l showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 88%. When both serum D-Dimer and CRP above the thresholds of 0.75 mg/l and 10 mg/l, respectively, were used to identify a PJI the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Serum D-Dimer showed a good sensitivity but a poor specificity for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI. Combination D-Dimer and CRP led to improvement of the specificity, however, at the cost of sensitivity. Thus, combination of both methods may be used as a confirmatory test in the diagnosis of shoulder PJI but not to rule out infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doruk Akgün
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Faisal Al-Muhtaresh
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alp Paksoy
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucca Lacheta
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Karczewski
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Plachel F, Akgün D, Imiolczyk JP, Minkus M, Moroder P. Patient-specific risk profile associated with early-onset primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: is it really primary? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:699-706. [PMID: 34406506 PMCID: PMC9925503 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04125-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although age is considered to be the major risk factor of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GOA), younger population may suffer from degenerative changes of the shoulder joint without evidence of any leading cause. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk profile in young patients suffering from presumably primary GOA. METHODS A consecutive group of 47 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty for early-onset GOA below the age of 60 years at time of surgery was retrospectively identified and prospectively evaluated. Patients with identifiable cause for GOA (secondary GOA) were excluded. The resulting 32 patients (mean age 52 ± 7 years; 17 male, 15 female) with primary GOA were matched by age (± 3 years) and gender to 32 healthy controls (mean age 53 ± 7 years; 17 male, 15 female). Demographic data and patient-related risk factors were assessed and compared among both groups to identify extrinsic risk factors for primary GOA. Patients were further subdivided into a group with concentric GOA (group A) and a group with eccentric GOA (group B) to perform a subgroup analysis. RESULTS Patients had a significantly higher BMI (p = 0.017), were more likely to be smokers (p < 0.001) and to have systematic diseases such as hypertension (p = 0.007) and polyarthritis (p < 0.001) and a higher Shoulder Activity Level (SAL) (p < 0.001) when compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, group B had a significantly higher SAL not only compared to healthy controls but also to group A, including activities such as combat sport (p = 0.048) and weightlifting (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Several patient-specific risk factors are associated with primary GOA in the young population, as well as highly shoulder demanding activities in the development of eccentric GOA. Consequently, a subset of young patients with eccentric primary GOA could in reality be secondary due to a muscular imbalance between internal and external rotators caused by improper weight training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, Case-Control study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Plachel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Doruk Akgün
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Philipp Imiolczyk
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moroder P, Lacheta L, Minkus M, Karpinski K, Uhing F, De Souza S, van der Merwe M, Akgün D. Implant Sizing and Positioning in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Rotator Cuff-Sparing Postero-Inferior Approach. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123324. [PMID: 35743395 PMCID: PMC9224587 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a rotator cuff-sparing postero-inferior (PI) approach with subdeltoidal access to the traditional subscapularis-takedown deltopectoral approach, in terms of implant sizing and positioning in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Methods: This study involved 18 human cadaveric shoulders with intact rotator cuffs and no evidence of head deforming osteoarthritis. An Eclipse stemless aTSA (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) was implanted in nine randomly selected specimens using a standard subscapularis-tenotomy deltopectoral approach, and in the other nine specimens using the cuff-sparing PI approach. Pre- and postoperative antero-posterior (AP) and axillary fluoroscopic radiographs were analyzed by two independent, blinded raters for the following parameters: (1) anatomic and prosthetic neck-shaft angle (NSA); (2) the shift between the anatomic and prosthetic center of rotation (COR); (3) anatomical size matching of the prosthetic humeral head; (4) the calculated Anatomic Reconstruction Score (ARS); (5) glenoid positioning; as well as (6) glenoid inclination and version. Results: While the COR was slightly but significantly positioned (p = 0.031) to be more medial in the PI approach group (3.7 ± 3.4%, range: −2.3% to 8.7%) than in the deltopectoral approach group (−0.2 ± 3.6%, range: −6.9% to 4.1%), on average, none of the remaining measured radiographic parameters significantly differed between both groups (PI approach group vs. deltopectoral group: NSA 130° vs. 127°, p = 0.57; COR supero-inferior, 2.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.35; COR antero-posterior, 0.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.57; head size supero-inferior, 97.3% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.15; head size antero-posterior, 101.1% vs. 100.6%, p = 0.54; ARS, 8.4 vs. 9.3, p = 0.13; glenoid positioning supero-inferior, 49.1% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.33; glenoid positioning antero-posterior, 49.3% vs. 50.4%, p = 0.23; glenoid inclination, 86° vs. 88°, p = 0.27; and glenoid retroversion, 91° vs. 89°, p = 0.27). Conclusions: A PI approach allows for sufficient exposure and orientation to perform rotator-cuff sparing aTSA with acceptable implant sizing and positioning in cadaveric specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucca Lacheta
- Arthrex GMBH, D-81249 Munich, Germany; (L.L.); (M.M.); (K.K.)
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Arthrex GMBH, D-81249 Munich, Germany; (L.L.); (M.M.); (K.K.)
| | | | - Frank Uhing
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany; (F.U.); (S.D.S.); (M.v.d.M.)
| | - Sheldon De Souza
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany; (F.U.); (S.D.S.); (M.v.d.M.)
| | - Michael van der Merwe
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany; (F.U.); (S.D.S.); (M.v.d.M.)
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Arthrex GMBH, D-81249 Munich, Germany; (L.L.); (M.M.); (K.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-304-5065-2319; Fax: +49-304-5051-5905
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Akgün D, Wiethölter M, Siegert P, Danzinger V, Minkus M, Braun KF, Moroder P. The role of serum C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:1715-1721. [PMID: 33515325 PMCID: PMC9296386 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03779-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a paucity of literature regarding serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in the evaluation of a shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of the current study was to establish cutoff values for diagnosing shoulder PJI and evaluate the influence of the type of infecting microorganism and the classification subgroups according to last proposed International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria on the CRP level. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of all 136 patients, who underwent septic or aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty in our institution between January 2010 and December 2019, was performed. Shoulder PJI was defined according to the last proposed definition criteria of the ICM. Serum CRP levels were compared between infected and non-infected cases, between infection subgroups, as well as between different species of infecting microorganisms. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to display sensitivity and specificity of serum CRP level for shoulder PJI. RESULTS A total of 52 patients (38%) were classified as infected, 18 meeting the criteria for definitive infection, 26 for probable infection and 8 for possible infection. According to the ROC curve, an optimized serum CRP threshold of 7.2 mg/l had a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 74% (area under curve = 0.72). Patients with definitive infection group demonstrated significantly higher median serum CRP levels (24.3 mg/l), when compared to probable, possible infection groups and PJI unlikely group (8 mg/l, 8.3 mg/l, 3.6 mg/l, respectively, p < 0.05). The most common isolated microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes in 25 patients (48%) followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) in 20 patients (39%). Patients with a PJI caused by high-virulent microorganisms had a significantly higher median serum CRP level compared to patients with PJI caused by low-virulent microorganisms (48 mg/l vs. 11.3 mg/l, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Serum CRP showed a low sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI, even applying cutoffs optimized by receiver-operating curve analysis. Low-virulent microorganisms and patients with probable and possible infections are associated with lower CRP levels compared to patients with definitive infection and infections caused by high-virulent microorganisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doruk Akgün
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Mats Wiethölter
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Siegert
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Victor Danzinger
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl Friedrich Braun
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité–University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Akgün D, Siegert P, Danzinger V, Plachel F, Minkus M, Thiele K, Moroder P. Glenoid vault and humeral head alignment in relation to the scapular blade axis in young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:756-762. [PMID: 32853792 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Static posterior subluxation of the humeral head is a pre-osteoarthritic deformity preceding posterior erosion in young patients. Its etiology remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in scapular morphology between young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head and healthy controls with a centered humeral head. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head who were treated in our institution between January 2018 and November 2019. Fourteen shoulders in 12 patients were included in this study and then matched according their age, sex, and affected side with controls. Computed tomography images of both groups were compared in the standardized axial imaging plane for differences in scapular morphology. The following parameters were measured: glenoid version relative to the Friedman line and scapular blade axis, scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation index, and neck angle, as well as glenoid and humeral offset. RESULTS The patients in the subluxation group showed significantly higher scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation indexes than controls (0.76 vs. 0.55 [P < .0001] and 0.58 vs. 0.51 [P = .016], respectively). The mean measurements of glenoid version according to the Friedman line and relative to the scapular blade axis were significantly higher in the subluxation group than in controls (19° vs. 4° [P < .0001]and 14° vs. 2° [P = .0002], respectively). The glenoid vault was significantly more anteriorly positioned with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group than in controls (neck angle, 166° vs. 173° [P = .0003]; glenoid offset, 9.2 mm vs. 4.6 mm [P = .0005]). The midpoint of the humeral head showed a posterior offset with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group, whereas controls had an anteriorly placed midpoint of the humeral head (-2 mm vs. 3.1 mm, P = .01). A higher scapulohumeral subluxation index showed significant correlations with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.493, P = .008 and decreased neck angle: r = -0.554, P = .002), a posterior humeral offset (r = -0.775, P < .0001), and excessive glenoid retroversion measured by both methods (Friedman line: r = 0.852, P < .0001; scapular blade axis: r = 0.803, P < .0001). A higher glenohumeral subluxation index also correlated significantly with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.403, P = .034; decreased neck angle: r = -0.406, P = .032) and posterior humeral offset (r = -0.502, P = .006). CONCLUSION Young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head have significant constitutional differences in scapular morphology in terms of an increased anterior glenoid offset, excessive glenoid retroversion, and increased posterior humeral offset in relation to the scapular blade compared with healthy matched controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doruk Akgün
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Paul Siegert
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Victor Danzinger
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathi Thiele
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Minkus M, Wieners G, Maziak N, Plachel F, Scheibel M, Kraus N. The ligamentous injury pattern in acute acromioclavicular dislocations and its impact on clinical and radiographic parameters. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:795-805. [PMID: 33271321 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are classified according to the Rockwood (RW) classification, which is based on radiographic findings. Several authors have suggested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for visualization of the capsuloligamentous structures stabilizing the AC joint. The aim of this study was to describe the ligamentous injury pattern in acute AC joint dislocations by MRI and investigate associations with clinical and radiographic parameters. METHODS This prospective study included 45 consecutive patients (5 women and 40 men; mean age, 33.6 years [range, 19-65 years]) with an acute AC joint separation (RW type I in 5, RW type II in 8, RW type III in 18, and RW type V in 14). All patients underwent physical examination of both shoulders, and clinical scores (Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant score, Taft score, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score) were used to evaluate the AC joint clinically as well as radiographically. Post-traumatic radiography included bilateral anteroposterior stress views and bilateral Alexander views to evaluate vertical instability and dynamic posterior translation. MRI was performed for assessment of the AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments and the delto-trapezoidal fascia. RESULTS Radiographic and MRI classifications were concordant in 23 of 45 patients (51%), whereas 22 injuries (49%) were misjudged; of these, 6 (13%) were reclassified to a more severe type and 16 (36%), to a less severe type. The integrity of the CC ligaments was found to have a clinical impact on vertical as well as horizontal translation determined by radiographs and on clinical parameters. Among patients with an MRI-confirmed complete disruption of the CC ligaments, 68% showed a radiographic CC difference > 30% and 75% showed complete dynamic posterior translation. Inferior clinical parameters were noted in these patients as compared with patients with intact CC ligaments or partial disruption of the CC ligaments (Constant score of 67 points vs. 49 points [P < .05] and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score of 51 points vs. 23 points [P < .05]). The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for assessment of the ligamentous injury pattern by MRI was fair to substantial (r = 0.37-0.66). CONCLUSION The integrity of the CC and AC ligaments found on MRI has an impact on clinical and radiographic parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Gero Wieners
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Maziak
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Natascha Kraus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Orthopedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Minkus M, Königshausen M, Maier D, Mauch F, Stein T, Greiner S, Moursy M, Scheibel M. Immobilization in External Rotation and Abduction Versus Arthroscopic Stabilization After First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:857-865. [PMID: 33596092 PMCID: PMC7961655 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520987823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of first-time shoulder dislocation (FSD) is a topic of debate. After high rates of recurrent instability after nonoperative management were reported in the literature, primary repair of FSD significantly increased. At the same time, new concepts were proposed that had promising results for immobilization in external rotation (ER) and abduction (ABD). PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rates (primary outcome) and clinical outcomes (secondary outcome parameters) of immobilization in ER+ABD versus arthroscopic primary stabilization after FSD. STUDY DESIGN Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with FSD were randomized to either treatment with immobilization in 60° of ER plus 30° of ABD (group 1) or surgical treatment with arthroscopic Bankart repair (group 2). Clinical evaluation was performed 1, 3, and 6 weeks as well as 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively or after reduction, including range of motion, instability testing, subjective shoulder value, Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Recurrent instability events were prospectively recorded. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 112 patients were included in this study. Of these, 60 patients were allocated to group 1 and 52 to group 2. At the 24-month follow-up, 91 patients (81.3%) were available for clinical examination. The recurrence rate was 19.1% in group 1 and 2.3% in group 2 (P = .016). No significant differences were found between groups regarding clinical shoulder scores (P > .05). Due to noncompliance with the immobilization treatment protocol, 4 patients (6.7%) were excluded. CONCLUSION Immobilization in ER+ABD versus primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization for the treatment of FSD showed no differences in clinical shoulder scores. However, recurrent instability was significantly higher after nonoperative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Königshausen
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Dirk Maier
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Frieder Mauch
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Thomas Stein
- Department of Sport Traumatology, Knee and Shoulder Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik, Frankfurt am Main, Germany,Department of Sports Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Mohamed Moursy
- Orthopedics & Trauma Centre, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany,Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Markus Scheibel, MD, Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany ()
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moroder P, Akgün D, Lacheta L, Thiele K, Minkus M, Maziak N, Khakzad T, Festbaum C, Rüttershoff K, Ellermann S, Weiss T, Jöns T, Danzinger V. Middle trapezius transfer for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears- anatomical feasibility study. J Exp Orthop 2021; 8:5. [PMID: 33484354 PMCID: PMC7826324 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-021-00326-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical feasibility of a middle trapezius transfer below the acromion for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. Methods This study involved 20 human cadaveric shoulders in 10 full-body specimens. One shoulder in each specimen was dissected and assessed for muscle and tendon extent, force vectors, and distance to the neurovascular structures. The opposite shoulder was used to evaluate the surgical feasibility of the middle trapezius transfer via limited skin incisions along with an assessment of range of motion and risk of neurovascular injury following transfer. Results The harvested acromial insertion of the middle trapezius tendon showed an average muscle length of 11.7 ± 3.0 cm, tendon length of 2.7 ± 0.9 cm, footprint length of 4.3 ± 0.7 cm and footprint width of 1.4 ± 0.5 cm. The average angle between the non-transferred middle trapezius transfer and the supraspinatus was 33 ± 10° in the transversal plane and 34 ± 14° in the coronal plane. The mean distance from the acromion to the neurovascular bundle was 6.3 ± 1.3 cm (minimum: 4.0 cm). During surgical simulation there was sufficient excursion of the MTT without limitation of range of motion in a retracted scapular position but not in a protracted position. No injuries to the neurovascular structures were noted. Conclusion Transfer of the acromial portion of the middle trapezius for replacement of an irreparable supraspinatus seems to be feasible in terms of size, vector, excursion, mobility and safety. However, some concern regarding sufficiency of transfer excursion remains as scapula protraction can increase the pathway length of the transfer. Level of evidence Basic Science Study/Anatomical Study
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Doruk Akgün
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucca Lacheta
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathi Thiele
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Maziak
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thilo Khakzad
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Festbaum
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Rüttershoff
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophia Ellermann
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Torsten Weiss
- Department for Anatomy, Institute for Functional Anatomy, Center for Surgical-anatomical Training, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Jöns
- Department for Anatomy, Institute for Functional Anatomy, Center for Surgical-anatomical Training, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Victor Danzinger
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité -Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boehm E, Minkus M, Moroder P, Scheibel M. Arthroscopic iliac crest bone grafting in recurrent anterior shoulder instability: minimum 5-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29:266-274. [PMID: 32285158 PMCID: PMC7862210 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05986-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical and radiologic mid- to long-term results of arthroscopic iliac crest bone-grafting for anatomic glenoid reconstruction in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. METHODS Seventeen patients were evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Clinical [range of motion, subscapularis tests, apprehension sign, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Constant Score (CS), Rowe Score (RS), Walch Duplay Score (WD), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)], and radiologic [X-ray (true a.p., Bernageau and axillary views) and computed tomography (CT)] outcome parameters were assessed. RESULTS Fourteen patients [mean age 31.1 (range 18-50) years] were available after a follow-up period of 78.7 (range 60-110) months. The SSV averaged 87 (range 65-100) %, CS 94 (range 83-100) points, RS 89 (range 30-100) points, WD 87 (range 25-100) points, and WOSI 70 (range 47-87) %. The apprehension sign was positive in two patients (14%). One patient required an arthroscopic capsular plication due to a persisting feeling of instability, while the second patient experienced recurrent dislocations after a trauma, but refused revision surgery. CT imaging showed a significant increase of the glenoid index from preoperative 0.8 ± 0.04 (range 0.7-0.8) to 1.0 ± 0.11 (range 0.8-1.2) at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Arthroscopic reconstruction of anteroinferior glenoid defects using an autologous iliac crest bone-grafting technique yields satisfying clinical and radiologic results after a mid- to long-term follow-up period. Postoperative re-dislocation was experienced in one (7.1%) of the patients due to a trauma and an anatomic reconstruction of the pear-shaped glenoid configuration was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Boehm
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Akgün D, Maziak N, Plachel F, Siegert P, Minkus M, Thiele K, Moroder P. The role of implant sonication in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:e222-e228. [PMID: 31924518 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of implant sonication fluid cultures in the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared with tissue culture. METHODS This was a retrospective case-control study analyzing all patients who underwent a revision surgery for any kind of suspected septic or aseptic event due to failed shoulder arthroplasty at our institution between July 2014 and December 2018. The diagnostic validity of implant sonication was analyzed on the basis of the last proposed definition criteria of the International Consensus Meeting and compared with standard tissue cultures. RESULTS Of the 72 patients, a total of 28 (38.9%) were classified as infected. Of the 28 infected patients, 20 (71.4%) had an identified organism by tissue cultures, and Cutibacterium acnes was the most commonly isolated pathogen. The sensitivities of sonicate fluid (≥50 CFU/mL) and periprosthetic tissue culture for the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection were 36% and 61% (P = .016), and the specificities were 97.7% and 100% (P > .99), respectively. If no cutoff value was used in sonication culture, the sensitivity increased to 75% whereas the specificity dropped to 82%. Although there was no significant difference in sensitivity between tissue culture and the no-cutoff sonication fluid culture (61% vs. 75%, P = .125), the specificity of tissue culture was significantly higher (100% vs. 82%, P = .01). CONCLUSION Tissue culture showed a higher sensitivity and specificity than implant sonication in the diagnosis of shoulder PJI and should remain the gold standard for microbiological diagnosis of shoulder PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doruk Akgün
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nina Maziak
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Siegert
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathi Thiele
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maziak N, Minkus M, Krüger D, Scheibel M. Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Multifragmented Anteroinferior Glenoid Rim Fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2020; 9:ST-D-19-00016. [PMID: 32051775 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.st.19.00016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal treatment of anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures remains a matter of debate. Surgical repair aims to prevent persistent instability and osteoarthritic changes of the glenohumeral joint1-3 and is recommended in patients with a subluxated humeral head and substantial displacement of the fracture fragment(s)3-5. Arthroscopic reconstruction with suture anchors was described by Sugaya et al. for large solitary glenoid rim fractures using an indirect reduction and fixation via labral repair6. We present the arthroscopic reconstruction of a multifragmented anteroinferior glenoid rim fracture using a modified knotless anchor technique and bioabsorbable pins. The additional fixation and compression may improve reduction and consolidation of the fracture. Description The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected arm fixed in a traction device. A standard posterior, an anterosuperior (suprabicipital), and a deep anteroinferior portal are required for this minimally invasive technique. A posterolateral portal may be required additionally. First, a diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to identify possible concomitant lesions. Labral repair enables an indirect reduction of the attached fracture fragments and is achieved by the aid of knotless suture anchors. Temporary reduction using Kirschner wires can be applied. Bioabsorbable pins can be used for additional ultimate fixation and compression of the fracture fragments. Alternatives A variety of surgical techniques for the reconstruction of glenoid rim fractures have been described in the literature, including open or arthroscopic screw osteosynthesis using either metallic or bioabsorbable screws3,6-10. Screw osteosynthesis, however, is not a feasible option for fractures with multiple small fragments3. Isolated suture anchor reconstruction represents another alternative6. Good clinical results and a high subjective satisfaction rate, however, can also be achieved by nonoperative treatment, depending on the patient and fracture characteristics3,10-12. Rationale This minimally invasive technique enables an almost anatomical reconstruction of the glenoid rim with a minor risk of hardware impingement compared with screw osteosynthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Maziak
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus-Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus-Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Krüger
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus-Virchow, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus-Virchow, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boehm E, Minkus M, Scheibel M. Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal articular cartilage defects of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2-11. [PMID: 31547946 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 07/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) constitutes an established treatment option for cartilage defects of the knee joint. Experience in the shoulder, however, is limited, and the management of cartilage defects remains a challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after ACI with 3-dimensional spheroids of human autologous matrix-associated chondrocytes in the shoulder. METHODS Seven male patients (median age, 42.8 years [range, 18-55 years]) underwent ACI for symptomatic focal grade IV cartilage lesions of the humeral head by an open or arthroscopic approach. Clinical parameters (range of motion, visual analog scale score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score) and osteoarthritis grades were assessed. Arthroscopic re-evaluation was additionally performed in 5 patients. RESULTS After a median follow-up period of 32 months (range, 22-58 months), the median Subjective Shoulder Value was 95% (range, 70%-100%) compared with 60% (range, 30%-60%) preoperatively, the visual analog scale score was 0 at rest and was a median of 0 (range, 0-2) during exercise, the median Constant score was 95 points (range, 80-100 points), and the median American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 97 points (range, 90-100 points). The median preoperative size of the cartilage lesion was 3 cm2 (range, 2.3-4.5 cm2). Arthroscopically, complete coverage of the cartilage defect was observed in 4 cases whereas a circumferential residual defect of 0.25 cm2 was found in 1 patient. Grade I osteoarthritis (Samilson and Prieto classification) was observed in 2 cases. One patient had postoperative adhesive capsulitis and required revision surgery. CONCLUSION ACI using 3-dimensional spheroids of human autologous matrix-associated chondrocytes for treatment of grade IV articular cartilage lesions of the humeral head achieves satisfactory clinical results during a short- to mid-term follow-up period and leads to successful defect coverage with only minor radiologic degenerative changes. In this case series, ACI proved to constitute a viable treatment in the shoulder joint. However, in consideration of the 2-stage surgical design and the cost intensiveness of this procedure, the indication is restricted to young and active symptomatic patients in our practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Boehm
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moroder P, Danzinger V, Maziak N, Plachel F, Pauly S, Scheibel M, Minkus M. Characteristics of functional shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:68-78. [PMID: 31378683 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathologic activation pattern of muscles can cause shoulder instability. We propose to call this pathology functional shoulder instability (FSI). The purpose of this prospective study was to provide an in-detail description of the characteristics of FSI. METHODS In the year 2017, a total of 36 consecutive cases of FSI presenting to our outpatient clinic were prospectively collected. Diagnostic investigation included a pathology-specific questionnaire, standardized clinical scores, clinical examination, psychological evaluation, video and dynamic fluoroscopy documentation of the instability mechanism, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In a final reviewing process, the material from all collected cases was evaluated and, according to the observed pattern, different subtypes of FSI were determined and compared. RESULTS Based on the pathomechanism, positional FSI (78%) was distinguished from nonpositional FSI (22%). Controllable positional FSI was observed in 6% of all cases and noncontrollable positional FSI in 72%, whereas controllable and noncontrollable nonpositional FSI were each detected in 11% of the cases. The different subtypes of FSI showed significant differences in all clinical scores (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index: P = .002, Rowe Score: P = .001, Subjective Shoulder Value: P = .001) and regarding functional impairment (shoulder stability: P < .001, daily activities: P = .001, sports activities: P < .001). Seventy-eight percent had posterior, 17% anterior, and 6% multidirectional instability. Although several patients showed constitutional glenoid shape alterations or soft tissue hyperlaxity, only few patients with acquired minor structural defects were observed. CONCLUSION FSI can be classified into 4 subtypes based on pathomechanism and volitional control. Depending on the subtype, patients show different degrees of functional impairment. The majority of patients suffer from unidirectional posterior FSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Victor Danzinger
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Maziak
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Pauly
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Minkus M, Wolke J, Fischer P, Scheibel M. Analysis of complication after open coracoid transfer as a revision surgery for failed soft tissue stabilization in recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139:1435-1444. [PMID: 31214758 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03220-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coracoid transfer represents a treatment option for patients with recurrent shoulder instability. Only a few studies exist about the complication rate of the coracoid transfer as a revision surgery following failed soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results and complication rate after coracoid transfer as a revision surgery. METHODS In this study 38 patients (4 females, 34 males, mean age 27 years) were included of whom 29 patients were available for follow-up after a mean of 27 months. Previous shoulder stabilization procedures were predominantly arthroscopic (n = 25). Complications were divided according to their timely appearance into early (< 3 months) and late (> 3 months) postoperatively as well as need for revision. Clinical scores [Constant Score (CS), Rowe Score (RS), Walch-Duplay-Score (WDS), WOSI and Subjective-Shoulder-Value (SSV)] were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. RESULTS In this patient cohort, the overall complication rate was 27.6%, all of them occurred > 3 months postoperatively. In seven of eight cases (24.1%) a repeat surgical procedure was conducted. Recurrent instability occurred in three patients (10.3%) of which two received a revision surgery (n = 1 iliac-crest bone graft, n = 1 labral repair). Due to persistent pain five patients underwent an arthroscopic implant removal. The complication rate was with 40% higher in patients with two or more previous surgeries (n = 4 out of 10 patients) compared to patients with one previous surgery (21%, n = 4 out of 19 patients). The scores increased significantly comparing pre- to postoperative [CS 74-90 points, RS 27-91 points, WDS 16-89 points, WOSI 40-76% and SSV 41-82% (p < 0.05)]. CONCLUSION The open coracoid transfer as a revision surgery after failed soft tissue stabilization leads to satisfying clinical results. However, the complication rate is high though comparable to data in the literature when used as a primary surgery. The indication for a coracoid transfer should be judged carefully and possible alternatives should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Wolke
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pit Fischer
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Akgün D, Maziak N, Plachel F, Minkus M, Scheibel M, Perka C, Moroder P. Diagnostic Arthroscopy for Detection of Periprosthetic Infection in Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty. Arthroscopy 2019; 35:2571-2577. [PMID: 31351811 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2018] [Revised: 03/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the utility of arthroscopic biopsies for detection of periprosthetic infection in painful shoulder arthroplasty without objective signs of infection. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy for painful shoulder arthroplasty from June 2012 through July 2018 was performed. Patients with a subsequent revision shoulder arthroplasty after diagnostic arthroscopy were included. Arthroscopic tissue culture results were compared with the culture results of intraoperative tissue samples obtained at the time of open revision surgery. A minimum of 3 tissue samples from synovia and bone-prosthesis interface with signs of synovitis or abnormal appearance was routinely collected. Cases with 2 or more positive cultures for the same microorganism obtained at open revision surgery were considered as true presence of infection. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee. RESULTS Twenty-three cases in 22 patients were included in this study. Five of these 23 cases were classified as true infection based on the samples obtained during open revision surgery, and 16 cases had a positive culture in diagnostic arthroscopy. Cutibacterium acnes was isolated in each case. Classifying any microbiologic growth in the arthroscopic biopsies as positive resulted in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, specificity of 39%, and positive predictive value of 31.3% for the detection of a periprosthetic shoulder infection (PPSI). If at least 2 positive samples with the same microbiologic growth in the arthroscopic biopsies were considered as positive, sensitivity and negative predictive value dropped to 80% and 94.4%, respectively, but the specificity and positive predictive value increased to 94.4% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Diagnostic arthroscopy is a useful diagnostic tool in patients with suspicion but no clear evidence of PPSI. Arthroscopically obtained tissue biopsies for culture offer a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PPSI if at least 2 cultures positive for the same microorganism are considered as infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doruk Akgün
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nina Maziak
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Perka
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maziak N, Audige L, Hann C, Minkus M, Scheibel M. Factors Predicting the Outcome After Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:2670-2677. [PMID: 31373831 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519862850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Factors influencing the outcome after arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations remain poorly investigated. PURPOSE To identify determinants of the radiological outcome and investigate associations between radiological and clinical outcome parameters. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute high-grade AC joint dislocations. The following potential determinants of the radiological outcome were examined using univariable and multivariable regression analyses: timing of surgery, initial AC joint reduction, isolated coracoclavicular (CC) versus combined CC and AC stabilization, ossification of the CC ligaments, age, and overweight status. In addition, associations between radiological (ie, CC difference, dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clinical outcome parameters (Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft score [TS] subjective subcategory, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score [ACJI] pain subitem) were evaluated using univariable analysis. RESULTS One hundred four patients with a mean (±SD) age of 38.1 ± 11.5 years were included in this study. The mean postoperative follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.9 years. Compared with patients with an overreduced AC joint after surgery, the CC difference was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 1.3-7.3; P = .006) higher in patients with incomplete reduction. Patients with anatomic reduction were 3.1 times (95% CI, 1.2-7.9; P = .017) more likely to develop DPT than those with an overreduced AC joint. An incompletely reduced AC joint was 5.3 times (95% CI, 2.1-13.4; P < .001) more likely to develop DPT versus an overreduced AC joint. Patients who underwent isolated CC stabilization were 4.8 times (95% CI, 1.1-21.0; P = .039) more likely to develop complete DPT than patients with additional AC stabilization. Significantly higher CC difference values were noted for patients who reported pain on the subjective TS (P = .025). Pain was encountered more commonly in patients with DPT (PTS = .049; PACJI = .038). CONCLUSION Clinicians should consider overreduction of the AC joint because it may lead to favorable radiological results. Because of its association with superior radiographic outcomes, consideration should also be given to the use of additional AC cerclage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Maziak
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laurent Audige
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Hann
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kraus N, Hann C, Minkus M, Maziak N, Scheibel M. Primary versus revision arthroscopically-assisted acromio- and coracoclavicular stabilization of chronic AC-joint instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139:1101-1109. [PMID: 30815725 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03153-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A gracilis tendon autograft with TightRope-augmentation can be used for arthroscopically-assisted acromioclavicular (AC)- and coracoclavicular (CC-)stabilization of chronic bidirectional AC-joint instability after failed primary treatment. The impact of failed initial treatment on postoperative outcome is unclear. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate it. METHODS Twenty-seven of 38 patients suffering from chronic AC-joint instability after either failed conservative (group 1) or surgical treatment (group 2) treated in the above-mentioned technique were finally included in this study. The Subjective Shoulder Value, the Constant Score, the Taft Score and the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score were used for clinical evaluation. Bilateral anteroposterior stress radiographs and bilateral Alexander views were obtained for radiological evaluation. RESULTS 14 patients of group 1 [3f/11m; median age 47.6 (range 20.9-57.4) years] could be evaluated after a median follow-up of 24.3 (range 20-31.2) months and 13 patients of group 2 [6f/7m; median age 44.9 (range 24.9-61.0) years] were available after a median follow-up of 28.8 (range 20-33) months. Comparison of clinical score results revealed no significant differences between both groups. The median CC-difference showed no significant difference between the groups [group 1 0.8 (0-10.5) mm, group 2 0.9 (0-4.3) mm]. CONCLUSION AC- and CC-stabilization of chronic bidirectional AC-joint instability using a gracilis tendon autograft with TightRope-augmentation can be recommended after failed conservative and surgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natascha Kraus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Hann
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Maziak
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Moroder P, Damm P, Wierer G, Böhm E, Minkus M, Plachel F, Märdian S, Scheibel M, Khatamirad M. Challenging the Current Concept of Critical Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Does the Size Measurement Really Tell It All? Am J Sports Med 2019; 47:688-694. [PMID: 30640513 DOI: 10.1177/0363546518819102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone loss at the anterior glenoid rim is a main reason for failure of soft-tissue based surgical stabilization procedures in patients with anterior shoulder instability. PURPOSE To evaluate the capability of conventional glenoid bone loss measurement techniques to provide an adequate estimation of the actual biomechanical effect of glenoid defects. STUDY DESIGN Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS Thirty consecutive patients with unilateral anterior shoulder instability and varying degrees of glenoid defect were included. Patient-specific computer tomography-based 3-dimensional shoulder models of the affected and unaffected sides were created. The bony shoulder stability ratio (SR) was determined in various potential dislocation directions with finite element analysis. Values obtained from conventional glenoid defect size measurement techniques (Pico and Sugaya) were correlated with the finite element analysis results. Additionally, a mathematical model was developed to theoretically analyze the correlation between glenoid defect size measurements and the SR. RESULTS The authors found substantial interindividual differences of the SR of the unaffected shoulders in all directions of measurement. Bone loss at the anterior glenoid rim significantly reduced the SR in the 2-o'clock ( P = .011), 3-o'clock ( P < .001), and 4-o'clock ( P < .001) directions referring to a right shoulder. The correlation between the defect size measurements and the SR for the 2-o'clock (rho = -0.522 and -0.580), 3-o'clock (rho = -0.597 and -0.580), and 4-o'clock (rho = -0.527 and -0.522) directions was statistically significant. However, it showed only moderate strength and was nonlinear as well as dependent on the inherent shape of the concavity. As shown by the mathematical model, bone loss has the most considerable effect at the edge of the glenoid rim, and an increasingly concave-shaped glenoid leads to an increase in loss of SR provoked by the same extent of bone loss. CONCLUSION Current glenoid bone loss measurements are unable to provide an adequate estimation on the actual biomechanical effect of glenoid defects because (1) the relation between the glenoid defect size and its biomechanical effect is nonlinear and (2) patients with shoulder instability have constitutional biomechanically relevant glenoid concavity shape differences. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings challenge the current concept of setting a general threshold for critical glenoid bone loss, which requires bony reconstruction surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Damm
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Guido Wierer
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Böhm
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Märdian
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Plachel F, Klatte-Schulz F, Minkus M, Böhm E, Moroder P, Scheibel M. Biological allograft healing after superior capsule reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27:e387-e392. [PMID: 30446234 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Plachel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Institute of Tendon and Bone Regeneration, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Franka Klatte-Schulz
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Böhm
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Moroder
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Moroder P, Plachel F, Huettner A, Ernstbrunner L, Minkus M, Boehm E, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M. The Effect of Scapula Tilt and Best-Fit Circle Placement When Measuring Glenoid Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability Patients. Arthroscopy 2018; 34:398-404. [PMID: 29100772 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the effect of lack of standardization on the reliability of current measurement techniques for glenoid bone loss in clinical practice. METHODS Ten consecutive patients with anterior glenoid bone loss due to recurrent anterior shoulder instability and available computed tomographic (CT) scans of the affected shoulder were included in this study. One hundred seventy 3-dimensional en-face view images of the 10 glenoids with up to 20° degrees of tilt in the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior direction were rendered. Three independent observers first identified the en-face view images and subsequently performed measurements of the defect surface and diameter as well as the glenoid surface and diameter on all 170 images. Measurements were completed based on the conventional best-fit circle technique using the edge of the visible glenoid bone as reference and additionally based on the so-called spoon technique, which places the best-fit circle on the edge of the visible glenoid concavity. RESULTS The overall agreement regarding en-face view image selection between the observers was 30% (K-alpha = 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.22). Tilt of the en-face view in any direction resulted in significant alterations of all 4 measurement parameters as well as the relative defect area and diameter (P < .05). The conventional and the spoon techniques rendered significantly different results regarding all 4 measurement parameters as well as the relative defect area (P < .05). CONCLUSION Impreciseness of scapula positioning for creation of an en-face view of the glenoid as well as varying best-fit circle placement significantly alter glenoid defect size measurement results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Because the glenoid defect size plays an important role in the choice of treatment for anterior shoulder instability, measurement techniques need to be as precise as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Fabian Plachel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Anna Huettner
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Ernstbrunner
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Boehm
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Gerhardt
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posterior glenohumeral instability (PGHI) is an often unrecognized or misdiagnosed type of shoulder instability due to its heterogenic clinical and radiological presentation. CLASSIFICATION The ABC classification for PGHI is based on the different pathomechanisms and recommended treatment standards and is therefore a guide to finding the correct diagnosis and therapy for affected patients. There are different types of PGHI: A (first time), B (dynamic), C (static). These groups are further classified based on pathomechanical principles: A1: subluxation, A2: dislocation; B1: functional, B2: structural; C1: constitutional, C2: acquired. THERAPY In patients with type 1 PGHI (A1, B1, C1) conservative treatment is recommended while in patients with type 2 PGHI (A2, B2, C2) surgical treatment can be considered based on structural defects, clinical symptoms, chronicity, age, functional demand, and patient-specific health status. In addition it has to be considered, that there is the possibility of coexisting or overlapping subtypes as well as the chance of progression from one category into another over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Moroder
- Abteilung für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - V Danzinger
- Abteilung für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Minkus
- Abteilung für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Scheibel
- Abteilung für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hann C, Kraus N, Minkus M, Maziak N, Scheibel M. Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26:212-220. [PMID: 28717889 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4643-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS Due to high rate of persisting dynamic posterior translation (DPT) following isolated coracoclavicular double-button technique for reconstruction of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint reported in the literature, an additional acromioclavicular cerclage was added to the procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients with high-grade AC-joint instability treated with a double TightRope technique with an additional percutaneous acromioclavicular cerclage. METHODS Fifty-nine patients (6 f/53 m; median age 38.3 (range 21.5-63.4 years) who sustained an acute high-grade AC-joint dislocation (Rockwood type V) were treated using the above-mentioned technique. At the final follow-up, the constant score (CS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV), the Taft score (TF) and the acromioclavicular joint instability score (ACJI) as well as bilateral anteroposterior stress views with 10 kg of axial load and bilateral modified Alexander views were obtained. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 26.4 (range 20.3-61.0) months, 34 patients scored a median of 90 (33-100) points in the CS, 90 (25-100) % in the SSV, 11 (4-12) points in the TF and 87 (43-100) points in the ACJI. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance was 12.1 (6.5-19.8) mm and the CC difference 2.0 (0.0-11.0) mm. Two patients (5.8%) showed a complete DPT of the AC joint, and fourteen patients (41.1%) displayed a partial DPT. The overall revision rate was 11.7%. Two patients presented implant irritation, one patient a recurrent instability, and one patient suffered from a local infection. CONCLUSION The arthroscopically assisted and image-intensifier-controlled double TightRope technique with an additional percutaneous acromioclavicular cerclage leads to good and excellent clinical results after a follow-up of 2 years. The incidence of persisting dynamic horizontal translation is lower compared to isolated coracoclavicular stabilization. Thus, we recommend using the double TightRope implant with an additional acromioclavicular cerclage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Hann
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Natascha Kraus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Maziak
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Minkus M, Hann C, Scheibel M, Kraus N. Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137:845-852. [PMID: 28417201 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Classification of AC-joint instability is based on radiologic evaluation of anteroposterior (a.p.) stress views of both shoulders, neglecting the horizontal component of instability. Recent studies have proposed an association of dynamic posterior translation (DPT) and inferior clinical results. The purpose of this study was to quantify DPT in modified Alexander views and correlate it with other radiological and clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients (4 f, 28 m, mean age 34.1) with acute AC-joint dislocation (16 = RW III, 16 = RW V) underwent radiological examination including bilateral a.p. stress views with measurement of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and bilateral modified Alexander views with different approaches to quantify DPT (overlapping area OAAC, overlapping length OLAC). In addition, the Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft Score (TF), and the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (ACJI) were obtained. RESULTS In Rockwood (RW) type III injuries, a mean CCD of 15.8 (9.8-22.8) mm, OAAC of 50.9 (0-216.6) mm2, and OLAC of 6.5 (-4.7-17.9) mm were found. RW V patients showed a CCD of 23.1 (13.7-32.0) mm; OAAC 7.0 (0-92.3) mm2; and OLAC -4.8 (-19.6-9.8) mm. Particularly in RW III the CCD, OAAC and OLAC revealed significant correlation with the ACJI (r = -0.64/r = 0.72/r = 0.68, p < 0.05) and TF (r = -0.56/r = 0.68/r = 0.51, p < 0.05). The proposed quantification tools for DPT were found to have a moderate-to-strong correlation with the score results, especially with AC-joint specific scores. RW type V injuries had a moderate correlation with clinical parameters (OAAC with ACJI: r = 0.44, p > 0.05 and OLAC with TF: r = -0.45, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Measuring the OLAC is a convenient way for quantifying DPT in modified Alexander views. It showed significant correlation with clinical scores, indicating the relevance of DPT in patients with AC-joint injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Hann
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Natascha Kraus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Moroder P, Minkus M, Böhm E, Danzinger V, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M. Use of shoulder pacemaker for treatment of functional shoulder instability: Proof of concept. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 12:103-108. [PMID: 28868087 PMCID: PMC5578354 DOI: 10.1007/s11678-017-0399-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Functional shoulder instability (polar type III) is caused by underactivity of rotator cuff and periscapular muscles, which leads to subluxation or dislocation during shoulder movement. While surgical treatment has shown no benefits, aggravates pain, and frequently diminishes function even further, conservative treatment is often ineffective as well. Objectives The aim was to investigate the effectiveness of a “shoulder pacemaker” device that stimulates underactive muscles in patients with functional instability during shoulder movement in order to re-establish glenohumeral stability. Patients and methods Three patients with unsuccessfully treated functional shoulder instability causing pain, emotional stress, as well as limitations during daily activities and sports participation were enrolled in this pilot project. The device was used to stimulate the external rotators of the shoulder and retractors of the scapula. Pain level, subjective shoulder instability, range of motion, visible aberrant muscle activation, and signs of dislocation were compared when the device was switched on and off. Results No changes were observed when the device was attached but switched off. When the device was switched on, all patients were able to move their arms freely without pain, discomfort, or subjective or objective signs of instability. All patients rated this as an excellent experience and volunteered to train further with the device. No complications were observed. Conclusion The electric stimulation of hypoactive rotator cuff and periscapular muscles by means of the shoulder pacemaker successfully re-establishes stability in patients with functional shoulder instability during the time of application. Video online The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s11678-017-0399-z) contains the video: “The Shoulder-Pacemaker: treatment of functional shoulder instability with pathological muscle activation pattern”. Video by courtesy of P. Moroder, M. Minkus, E. Böhm, V. Danzinger, C. Gerhardt and M. Scheibel, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin 2017, all rights reserved
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Moroder
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Böhm
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Victor Danzinger
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Gerhardt
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Acute acromioclavicular (AC)-joint dislocations are common injuries of the shoulder girdle. Surgical repair is indicated for acute high-grade (Rockwood types IV, V, and VI) AC-joint injuries. The best treatment for type III is still controversial, but young and active patients with this type of injury might benefit from a surgical AC-joint stabilization. Surgery should be performed within the first 3 weeks after the injury since the biological healing potential decreases with time. Acute AC-joint separation is diagnosed by clinical examination and radiography. Vertical translation anteroposterior stress views with a 10-kg load are used to grade the injuries. Bilateral lateral stress (Alexander) views are used to evaluate dynamic horizontal translation qualitatively. Arthroscopic techniques for AC reconstruction have become more popular in recent years because they are minimally invasive; they allow treatment of concomitant glenohumeral lesions; and they can be performed in one step, with insertion of implants that do not have to be removed later. The arthroscopically assisted double-button technique with an additional AC cerclage was developed to stabilize the AC joint by internal bracing of the torn ligaments. The procedure consists of the following steps. Step 1: With the patient in the beach-chair position, a 2-cm incision is made on top of the clavicle and posterior and lateral viewing portals as well as an anteroinferior working portal are created. Step 2: With the arthroscope in the lateral portal, the subcoracoid bursa and the base of the coracoid are dissected with a radiofrequency ablation device through the anteroinferior portal. Step 3: Coracoclavicular drilling is done with use of a drill guide and under arthroscopic and image-intensifier control. After overdrilling of the Kirschner wires, Nitinol suture passers are introduced and retrieved via the anteroinferior portal. Step 4: Transclavicular and transacromial drill-holes are established for the AC cerclage. Step 5: The 2 double-button devices are attached to the Nitinol suture passers, and the inferior buttons are shuttled through the clavicle and coracoid and then placed parallel to the coracoid base. Step 6: The sutures are tightened, and an anatomical vertical reduction of the AC joint is achieved. Step 7: A triangular acromioclavicular nonabsorbable cerclage tape is used for horizontal stabilization. Step 8: The clavicular incision is closed in 2 layers, including the repair of the deltotrapezoidal fascia and the arthroscopic portals, in a standard fashion. The combined arthroscopically-assisted and image-intensifier-controlled double-button technique with an additional AC cerclage is a safe procedure that enables an anatomical reduction of the AC joint and yields good to excellent clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Minkus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Natascha Kraus
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Hann
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Scheibel
- Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sciancalepore AG, Sallustio F, Girardo S, Passione LG, Camposeo A, Mele E, Di Lorenzo M, Costantino V, Schena FP, Pisignano D, Casino FG, Mostacci SD, Di Carlo M, Sabato A, Procida C, Creput C, Vanholder R, Stolear JC, Lefrancois G, Hanoy M, Nortier J, Potier J, Sereni L, Ferraresi M, Pereno A, Nazha M, Barbero S, Piccoli GB, Ficheux A, Gayrard N, Duranton F, Guzman C, Szwarc I, Bismuth -Mondolfo J, Brunet P, Servel MF, Argiles A, Bernardo A, Demers J, Hutchcraft A, Marbury TC, Minkus M, Muller M, Stallard R, Culleton B, Krieter DH, Korner T, Devine E, Ruth M, Jankowski J, Wanner C, Lemke HD, Surace A, Rovatti P, Steckiph D, Mancini E, Santoro A, Leypoldt JK, Agar BU, Bernardo A, Culleton BF, Vankova S, Havlin J, Klomp DJ, Van Beijnum F, Day JPR, Wieringa FP, Kooman JP, Gremmels H, Hazenbrink DH, Simonis F, Otten ML, Wester M, Boer WH, Joles JA, Gerritsen KG, Umimoto K, Shimamoto Y, Mastushima K, Miyata M, Muller M, Naik A, Pokropinski S, Bairstow S, Svatek J, Young S, Johnson R, Bernardo A, Rikker C, Juhasz E, Gaspar R, Rosivall L, Rusu E, Zilisteanu D, Balanica S, Achim C, Atasie T, Carstea F, Voiculescu M, Monzon Vazquez T, Saiz Garcia S, Mathani V, Escamilla Cabrera B, Cornelis T, Van Der Sande FM, Eloot S, Cardinaels E, Bekers O, Damoiseaux J, Leunissen KM, Kooman J, Baamonde Laborda E, Bosch Benitez-Parodi E, Perez Suarez G, Anton Perez G, Batista Garcia F, Lago Alonso M, Garcia Canton C, Hashimoto S, Seki M, Tomochika M, Yamamoto R, Okamoto N, Nishikawa A, Koike T, Ravagli E, Maldini L, Badiali F, Perazzini C, Lanciotti G, Steckiph D, Surace A, Rovatti P, Severi S, Rigotti A, McFarlane P, Marticorena R, Dacouris N, Pauly R, Nikitin S, Amdahl M, Bernardo A, Culleton B, Calabrese G, Mancuso D, Mazzotta A, Vagelli G, Balenzano C, Steckiph D, Bertucci A, Della Volpe M, Gonella M, Uchida T, Ando K, Kofuji M, Higuchi T, Momose N, Ito K, Ueda Y, Miyazawa H, Kaku Y, Nabata A, Hoshino T, Mori H, Yoshida I, Ookawara S, Tabei K, Umimoto K, Suyama M, Shimamoto Y, Miyata M, Kamada A, Sakai R, Minakawa A, Fukudome K, Hisanaga S, Ishihara T, Yamada K, Fukunaga S, Inagaki H, Tanaka C, Sato Y, Fujimoto S, Potier J, Bouet J, Queffeulou G, Bell R, Nolin L, Pichette V, Provencher H, Lamarche C, Nadeau-Fredette AC, Ouellet G, Leblanc M, Bezzaoucha S, Kouidmir Y, Kassis J, Alonso ML, Lafrance JP, Vallee M, Fils J, Mailley P, Cantaluppi V, Medica D, Quercia AD, Dellepiane S, Ferrario S, Gai M, Leonardi G, Guarena C, Caiazzo M, Biancone L, Enos M, Culleton B, Wiebenson D, Potier J, Hanoy M, Duquennoy S, Tingli W, Ling Z, Yunying S, Ping F, Dolley-Hitze T, Hamel D, Lombart ML, Leypoldt JK, Bernardo A, Hutchcraft AM, Vanholder R, Culleton BF, Movilli E, Camerini C, Gaggia P, Zubani R, Feller P, Pola A, Carli O, Salviani C, Manenti C, Cancarini G, Bozzoli L, Colombini E, Ricchiuti G, Pisanu G, Gargani L, Donadio C, Sidoti A, Lusini ML, Biagioli M, Ghezzi PM, Sereni L, Caiazzo M, Palladino G, Tomo T, Ishida K, Nakata T, Hamel D, Dolley-Hitze T. HAEMODIALYSIS TECHNIQUES AND ADEQUACY 1. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|