Tissue-engineered collagen meniscus implants: 5- to 6-year feasibility study results

Advances in meniscus tissue engineering: Towards bridging the gaps from bench to bedside

Meniscus is vital for maintaining the anatomical and functional integrity of knee. Injuries to meniscus, commonly caused by trauma or degenerative processes, can result in knee joint dysfunction and secondary osteoarthritis, while current conservative and surgical interventions for meniscus injuries bear suboptimal outcomes. In the past decade, there has been a significant focus on advancing meniscus tissue engineering, encompassing isolated scaffold strategies, biological augmentation, physical stimulus, and meniscus organoids, to improve the prognosis of meniscus injuries. Despite noteworthy promising preclinical results, translational gaps and inconsistencies in the therapeutic efficiency between preclinical and clinical studies exist. This review comprehensively outlines the developments in meniscus tissue engineering over the past decade (Scheme 1). Reasons for the discordant results between preclinical and clinical trials, as well as potential strategies to expedite the translation of bench-to-bedside approaches are analyzed and discussed.

Outcome comparison of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and meniscal scaffold implantation (MSI): a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have reported successful clinical outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) or meniscal scaffold implantation (MSI), the difference between the outcome of MAT and MSI remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To compare the overall outcomes and survival rates of MAT and MSI, aiming to provide comprehensive evidence for determining the optimal treatment strategy for meniscal defects.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed via a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies of MAT or MSI were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Lysholm score was chosen as the primary outcome measure, while secondary outcomes encompassed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sports (RTS) rates, survival rates, and complication rates. The outcomes were stratified into two groups: MAT group and MSI group, followed by statistical comparison ( P <0.05). The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) assessment tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) for non-randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

A total of 3932 patients (2859 MAT, 1073 MSI) in 83 studies (51 MAT, 32 MSI) had the overall significant improvement in all clinical scores. The group MSI had a higher Lysholm score of both preoperative ( P =0.002) and postoperative ( P <0.001) than group MAT; however, the mean improvements were similar between the two groups ( P =0.105). Additionally, MSI had higher improvements of IKDC ( P <0.001), KOOS symptom ( P =0.010), KOOS pain ( P =0.036), and KOOS ADL ( P =0.004) than MAT. Interestingly, MAT had higher preoperative ( P =0.018) and less postoperative VAS pain ( P =0.006), which was more improved in MAT ( P <0.001). Compared with MAT, MSI had a higher 10-year survival rate ( P =0.034), a similar mid-term survival rate MAT ( P =0.964), and a lower complication rate ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both MAT and MSI could have good clinical outcomes after surgery with a similar improvement in Lysholm score. MSI had a higher 10-year survival rate and fewer complications than MAT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review.

Short-Term but Not Long-Term Knee Symptoms and Functional Improvements of Tissue Engineering Strategy for Meniscus Defects: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

PURPOSE

To investigate the up-to-date clinical outcomes of tissue-engineered meniscus implants for meniscus defects.

METHODS

A search was performed by 3 independent reviewers on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane from 2016 to June 18, 2023, with the term "meniscus" with all the following terms: "scaffolds," "constructs," "implant," and "tissue engineering." Inclusion criteria included "Clinical trials" and "English language articles" that involved isolated meniscus tissue engineering strategies for meniscus injuries. Only Level I to IV clinical studies were considered. The modified Coleman Methodology score was used for quality analysis of included clinical trials. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies was employed for analysis of the risk of study bias and methodological quality.

RESULTS

The search identified 2,280 articles, and finally 19 original clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Three types of tissue-engineered meniscus implants (CMI-Menaflex, Actifit, and NUsurface) have been clinically evaluated for meniscus reconstruction. Lack of standardized outcome measures and imaging protocols limits comparison between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue-engineered meniscus implants can provide short-term knee symptom and function improvements, but no implants have been shown to propose significant long-term benefits for meniscus defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

A decellularized and sterilized human meniscus allograft for off-the-shelf meniscus replacement

PURPOSE

Meniscus tears are one of the most frequent orthopedic knee injuries, which are currently often treated performing meniscectomy. Clinical concerns comprise progressive degeneration of the meniscus tissue, a change in knee biomechanics, and an early onset of osteoarthritis. To overcome these problems, meniscal transplant surgery can be performed. However, adequate meniscal replacements remain to be a great challenge. In this research, we propose the use of a decellularized and sterilized human meniscus allograft as meniscal replacement.

METHODS

Human menisci were subjected to a decellularization protocol combined with sterilization using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂). The decellularization efficiency of human meniscus tissue was evaluated via DNA quantification and Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and DAPI staining. The mechanical properties of native, decellularized, and decellularized + sterilized meniscus tissue were evaluated, and its composition was determined via collagen and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) quantification, and a collagen and GAG stain. Additionally, cytocompatibility was determined in vitro.

RESULTS

Human menisci were decellularized to DNA levels of ~ 20 ng/mg of tissue dry weight. The mechanical properties and composition of human meniscus were not significantly affected by decellularization and sterilization. Histologically, the decellularized and sterilized meniscus tissue had maintained its collagen and glycosaminoglycan structure and distribution. Besides, the processed tissues were not cytotoxic to seeded human dermal fibroblasts in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Human meniscus tissue was successfully decellularized, while maintaining biomechanical, structural, and compositional properties, without signs of in vitro cytotoxicity. The ease at which human meniscus tissue can be efficiently decellularized, while maintaining its native properties, paves the way towards clinical use.

Failure rates and clinical outcomes of synthetic meniscal implants following partial meniscectomy: a systematic review

Background

Meniscal injury is one of the most common indications for knee surgery. The advent of meniscal repair techniques has facilitated meniscal preservation in suitable cases. Meniscal substitution with scaffolds may be advantageous following partial meniscal resection. There are three main scaffolds in current clinical use; Collagen Meniscal Implant (CMI Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), Actifit (Actifit, Orteq Ltd, London, UK) and NUsurface (Active Implants, LLC). The purpose of this systematic review was to compare clinical outcomes and failure rates of patients who have had implantation with these meniscal scaffolds.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies that included patients who had surgical implantation with Actifit or CMI. Eligibility criteria included papers that described both clinical outcomes and failure rates of these implants, a mean follow up of 5 years and studies published in English. A Google search was also performed to identify any grey literature.

Results

Five Level IV studies were found for Actifit. One Level II, one Level III and four Level IV studies were found for the CMI implant. One Level II study was identified for the NUsurface scaffold with a follow-up 12 months and was included for completeness. Overall, 262 patients were treated with Actifit, 109 with CMI and 65 with NUsurface. Failure rates for Actifit were 18% (range 6.3–31.8%) with a mean follow up of 66.8 months, and for CMI 6.5% (range 0–11.8%) with a mean follow up of 97.1 months. The NUsurface failure rate was 16.9% at 12 months. Clinical outcomes such as VAS, Tegner and Lysholm scores improved significantly post-operatively. However, there was a high volume of concurrent procedures, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and high tibial osteotomies in each study group; 118 (45%) for Actifit and 53 (45%) for CMI.

Conclusion

The evidence for meniscal scaffold use is insufficient to suggest that they could potentially improve clinical outcomes in patients post-meniscal resection. This is largely due to the high proportion of concurrent procedures performed at index procedure for both CMI and Actifit. On the basis of current evidence, the use of meniscal scaffolds as a sole treatment for partial meniscal defects cannot be recommended, owing to the relatively high failure rate and paucity of clinical data.

A Comparison Between Polyurethane and Collagen Meniscal Scaffold for Partial Meniscal Defects: Similar Positive Clinical Results at a Mean of 10 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To compare, at long-term follow-up, the clinical outcomes and failures of collagen and polyurethane meniscal scaffolds for the treatment of partial meniscal defects.

METHODS

Patients affected by partial meniscal defect with intact anterior and posterior meniscal attachments and an intact rim at the circumference of the missing meniscus were included, treated with a collagen meniscal implant or with polyurethane scaffold, and clinically evaluated by analysis of the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, the visual analog scale score for the evaluation of knee function and symptoms, and the Tegner score to assess the activity level.

RESULTS

After 3 patients dropped out, a total of 47 patients, comprising 31 men and 16 women, with a mean age of 43 ± 14.1 years and mean body mass index of 25 ± 1.4, were clinically evaluated up to a mean of 10 years' follow-up. The International Knee Documentation Committee score improved from 42.9 ± 15.9 to 67.4 ± 12.4 (P < .0005) in the polyurethane implant group and from 46.8 ± 16.7 to 62.1 ± 22.6 (P < .0005) in the collagen meniscal implant group. The visual analog scale score decreased significantly from baseline values of 5.4 ± 2.3 and 4.4 ± 1.7, to 3.4 ± 2.5 and 2.7 ± 2.4, respectively, at final follow-up in the polyurethane implant (P = .002) and collagen meniscal implant (P < .0005) groups. The Tegner score improved in both groups without reaching the preinjury activity level. No significant differences in the scores were found between the polyurethane and collagen scaffold groups. A total of 10 implants failed, 5 per group, for a cumulative failure rate of 21.3%, with no differences between the 2 scaffolds.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term comparison showed positive and similar results for both polyurethane- and collagen-based meniscal scaffolds, with an implant survival rate of about 80% at 10 years of follow-up and no differences in terms of pain, function, and activity level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case-control comparative study.

Study on feasibility of the partial meniscal allograft transplantation

Since the meniscus is an important stabilizing structure of the knee joint and has a significant role in load-bearing and shock absorption, so the complete structural and functional reconstructions of the teared menisci should be done not only after partial meniscectomy but also post total meniscectomy. So far, animal experiments and good clinical practice have showed that TMAT after total meniscectomy has partially solved the problem of structural and functional reconstructions after total meniscectomy. However, partial meniscectomy will also lead to accelerated knee degeneration, and its proportion is much higher than that of patients with total meniscectomy. Herein, the feasibility of PMAT after partial meniscectomy was investigated for the first time by using the 40% posterior horn meniscectomy model of the medial meniscus in Beagle dogs, and also for the first time, TMAT group and the total meniscectomy group were used as control groups. Compared with the TMAT, the transcriptomics evaluation, scanning electron microscope observation, histological regeneration and structure, biomechanical property, inflammation environment, and the knee function post PMAT were more similar to that of normal meniscus was first reported. This study provides a PMAT scheme with clinical translational value for the complete structural and functional reconstruction of the patients with partial meniscectomy and fills the gap in the field of teared meniscus therapy on the basis of quite well clinical applications of the meniscus repair and the TMAT.

No differences in clinical outcome between CMI and Actifit meniscal scaffolds: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the results of two meniscal scaffolds, CMI and Actifit, for the treatment of partial meniscal lesions.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases in January 2021, including randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and prospective and retrospective observational studies on the clinical results of meniscal scaffolds. A meta-analysis of the clinical results was performed; the rate of failures was recorded, as well as radiological results. The quality of the included studies was assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).

RESULTS

The search identified 37 studies (31 in the last 10 years): 2 RCTs, 5 comparative studies, 26 prospective and 4 retrospective series on a total of 1276 patients (472 CMI, 804 Actifit). The quality of evidence was generally low. An overall significant improvement in all clinical scores was documented for both scaffolds. The meta-analysis showed no differences between the two scaffolds in terms of patient reported outcome measures and activity level. The meta-analysis on the risk of failures documented a risk of failures of 7% in the CMI and of 9% in the Actifit group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a growing interest on the results of meniscal scaffolds, with most studies published recently. However, long-term data on the Actifit scaffold and high-level comparative studies are missing. Both CMI and Actifit offered good clinical results with a significant and comparable improvement in symptoms and function, and with a low number of failures over time. Accordingly, with the proper indication, their use may be encouraged in the clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Biomechanical Analysis of Segmental Medial Meniscal Transplantation in a Human Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND

Meniscal deficiency has been reported to increase contact pressures in the affected tibiofemoral joint, possibly leading to degenerative changes. Current surgical options include meniscal allograft transplantation and insertion of segmental meniscal scaffolds. Little is known about segmental meniscal allograft transplantation.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of segmental medial meniscal allograft transplantation in the setting of partial medial meniscectomy in restoring native knee loading characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees underwent central midbody medial meniscectomy and subsequent segmental medial meniscal allograft transplantation. Knees were loaded in a dynamic tensile testing machine to 1000 N for 20 seconds at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Four conditions were tested: (1) intact medial meniscus, (2) deficient medial meniscus, (3) segmental medial meniscal transplant fixed with 7 meniscocapsular sutures, and (4) segmental medial meniscal transplant fixed with 7 meniscocapsular sutures and 1 suture fixed through 2 bone tunnels. Submeniscal medial and lateral pressure-mapping sensors assessed mean contact pressure, peak contact pressure, mean contact area, and pressure mapping. Two-factor random-intercepts linear mixed effects models compared pressure and contact area measurements among experimental conditions.

RESULTS

The meniscal-deficient state demonstrated a significantly higher mean contact pressure than all other testing conditions (mean difference, ≥0.35 MPa; P < .001 for all comparisons) and a significantly smaller total contact area as compared with all other testing conditions (mean difference, ≤140 mm²; P < .001 for all comparisons). There were no significant differences in mean contact pressure or total contact area among the intact, transplant, or transplant-with-tunnel groups or in any outcome measure across all comparisons in the lateral compartment. No significant differences existed in center of pressure and relative pressure distribution across testing conditions.

CONCLUSION

Segmental medial meniscal allograft transplantation restored the medial compartment mean contact pressure and mean contact area to values measured in the intact medial compartment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Segmental medial meniscal transplantation may provide an alternative to full meniscal transplantation by addressing only the deficient portion of the meniscus with transplanted tissue. Additional work is required to validate long-term fixation strength and biologic integration.

Segmental Meniscus Allograft Transplantation

Meniscal tears treated with partial meniscectomies have been shown to significantly increase contract pressures within the tibiofemoral joint, and a complete focal meniscal deficiency may render the entirety of the meniscus functionally incompetent. Although various techniques of meniscal transplantation have been described, these techniques may require the excision of a considerable amount of healthy meniscal tissue. Furthermore, failures continue to frequently occur. Therefore, attempts to restoring normal knee kinematics and biomechanical forces are essential. Segmental meniscus allograft transplantations may offer the advantage of a robust repair by both maintaining knee biomechanics and biology while maximizing preservation of native meniscal tissue. Also, most meniscal deficiency involves only a portion of the meniscus, and thus we developed this technique to segmentally transplant only the deficient portion. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a technique of segmental medial meniscus allograft transplantation in a patient with focal medial meniscus deficiency.

MR variability of collagen meniscal implant remodelling in patients with good clinical outcome

PURPOSE

Collagen meniscal implants (CMI) have variable imaging findings on MRI and it remains ambiguous, if alterations may be present in asymptomatic patients. The aim was, to evaluate MR morphological characteristics and volume of CMI in the early, mid- and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients (mean age, 43.6±11 years; 41 male/16 female) with good clinical outcome (subjective visual analogue scale for satisfaction < 2 and a Lysholm-score ≥ 84) after CMI were assessed retrospectively using MRI 1, 2 and 3-8 years postoperatively. CMI morphology, signal intensity (SI), homogeneity and size were assessed and a meniscal score was calculated. Chondral defects and bone marrow edema pattern were reported and summarized in a chondral score. Meniscal extrusion and volume were evaluated. Intra- and inter-reader reliabilities were calculated. Spearman and partial correlations were used (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

One year postoperatively, the CMI varied in size [10% (4/40) normal, 30% (12/40) small, 60% (24/40) hypertrophic] and was hyperintense and inhomogeneous in all patients. At long-term follow-up, the size of CMI decreased [6% (1/17) resorbed, 18% (3/17) normal, 41% (7/17) small, 35% (6/17) hypertrophic]. The SI of the CMI changed to normal in only 13% (2/16). The majority was still hyperintense [87% (14/16)]. Less meniscal extrusion was present in the follow-up [71% (11/16) versus initially 93% (37/40)]. The meniscal score improved significantly (ρ = 0.28). Over time, full-thickness femoral chondral defects were increasingly present [65% (10/17) versus initially 33% (13/40)] and the chondral score worsened significantly (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal and inhomogeneous SI and irregular margins of the early postoperative CMI on MRI are findings seen in patients with good clinical results and should not necessarily be overcalled when reporting MRI. These features tend to decrease over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A professional athlete functionally active 10 years after an arthroscopic lateral collagen meniscus implant

The case of a former high-level professional soccer player is presented at 10-year follow-up after arthroscopically implanted lateral Collagen Meniscus Implant (CMI). The patient achieved a full-knee functional recovery and a complete sport resumption to the same pre-injury level for several soccer seasons and he is still performing semi-professional soccer activity (minor league) 10 years after surgery.Level of evidence Case Report. Level IV.

Meniscal substitution, a developing and long-awaited demand

The menisci represent indispensable intraarticular components of a well-functioning knee joint. Sports activities, traumatic incidents, or simply degenerative conditions can cause meniscal injuries, which often require surgical intervention. Efforts in biomechanical and clinical research have led to the recommendation of a meniscus-preserving rather than a meniscus-resecting treatment approach. Nevertheless, partial or even total meniscal resection is sometimes inevitable. In such circumstances, techniques of meniscal substitution are required. Autologous, allogenic, and artificial meniscal substitutes are available which have evolved in recent years. Basic anatomical and biomechanical knowledge, clinical application, radiological and clinical outcomes as well as future perspectives of meniscal substitutes are presented in this article. A comprehensive knowledge of the different approaches to meniscal substitution is required in order to integrate these evolving techniques in daily clinical practice to prevent the devastating effects of lost meniscal tissue.

Personalized Fiber-Reinforcement Networks for Meniscus Reconstruction

The menisci are fibrocartilaginous tissues that are crucial to the load-sharing and stability of the knee, and when injured, these properties are compromised. Meniscus replacement scaffolds have utilized the circumferential alignment of fibers to recapitulate the microstructure of the native meniscus; however, specific consideration of size, shape, and morphology has been largely overlooked. The purpose of this study was to personalize the fiber-reinforcement network of a meniscus reconstruction scaffold. Human cadaveric menisci were measured for a host of tissue (length, width) and subtissue (regional widths, root locations) properties, which all showed considerable variability between donors. Next, the asymmetrical fiber network was optimized to minimize the error between the dimensions of measured menisci and predicted fiber networks, providing a 51.0% decrease (p = 0.0091) in root-mean-square (RMS) error. Finally, a separate set of human cadaveric knees was obtained, and donor-specific fiber-reinforced scaffolds were fabricated. Under cyclic loading for load-distribution analysis, in situ implantation of personalized scaffolds following total meniscectomy restored contact area (253.0 mm2 to 488.9 mm2, p = 0.0060) and decreased contact stress (1.96 MPa to 1.03 MPa, p = 0.0025) to near-native values (597.4 mm2 and 0.83 MPa). Clinical use of personalized meniscus devices that restore physiologic contact stress distributions may prevent the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis following meniscal injury.

Polyurethane Meniscal Scaffold for the Treatment of Partial Meniscal Deficiency: 5-Year Follow-up Outcomes: A European Multicentric Study

BACKGROUND

A biodegradable polyurethane scaffold was developed to treat patients with the challenging clinical condition of painful partial meniscal defects.

HYPOTHESIS

The use of an acellular polyurethane scaffold in patients with symptomatic partial meniscal defects would result in both midterm pain relief and improved function.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 155 patients with symptomatic partial meniscal defects (101 medial and 54 lateral) were implanted with a polyurethane scaffold in a prospective, single-arm, multicentric study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were measured with the visual analog scale for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, Lysholm knee scale, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at baseline and at 2- and 5-year follow-ups. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the knee joint, meniscal implant, and meniscal extrusion. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed. Removal of the scaffold, conversion to a meniscal transplant, and unicompartmental/total knee arthroplasty were used as endpoints.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were lost to follow-up (11.6%). The patients who were included in this study showed significant clinical improvement after surgery as indicated by the different outcome measures (P = .01). However, the clinical improvement tended to stabilize between 2 and 5 years of follow-up. MRI scans of the scaffolds in 56 patients showed a smaller-sized implant in the majority of the cases when compared with the native meniscus with an irregular surface at the 5-year follow-up. During the follow-up period, 87.6% of the implants survived in this study. At 5 years of follow-up, 87.9% of the medial scaffolds were still functioning versus 86.9% of the lateral scaffolds. In total, 23 treatments had failed: 10 removed scaffolds because of breakage, 7 conversions to meniscal allograft transplantation, 4 conversions to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and 2 conversions to total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

The polyurethane meniscal implant was able to improve knee joint function and reduce pain in patients with segmental meniscal deficiency over 5 years after implantation. The MRI appearance of this scaffold was different from the original meniscal tissue at the midterm follow-up. The treatment survival rates of 87.9% of the medial scaffolds and 86.9% of the lateral scaffolds in the present study compared favorably with those published concerning meniscal allograft transplantation after total meniscectomy.

Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review from a Basic and Translational Science Perspective

Meniscus injuries are among the most common athletic injuries and result in functional impairment in the knee. Repair is crucial for pain relief and prevention of degenerative joint diseases like osteoarthritis. Current treatments, however, do not produce long-term improvements. Thus, recent research has been investigating new therapeutic options for regenerating injured meniscal tissue. This review comprehensively details the current methodologies being explored in the basic sciences to stimulate better meniscus injury repair. Furthermore, it describes how these preclinical strategies may improve current paradigms of how meniscal injuries are clinically treated through a unique and alternative perspective to traditional clinical methodology.

PCL-MECM-Based Hydrogel Hybrid Scaffolds and Meniscal Fibrochondrocytes Promote Whole Meniscus Regeneration in a Rabbit Meniscectomy Model

Regeneration of an injured meniscus continues to be a scientific challenge due to its poor self-healing potential. Tissue engineering provides an avenue for regenerating a severely damaged meniscus. In this study, we first investigated the superiority of five concentrations (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%) of meniscus extracellular matrix (MECM)-based hydrogel in promoting cell proliferation and the matrix-forming phenotype of meniscal fibrochondrocytes (MFCs). We found that the 2% group strongly enhanced chondrogenic marker mRNA expression and cell proliferation compared to the other groups. Moreover, the 2% group showed the highest glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and collagen production by day 14. We then constructed a hybrid scaffold by 3D printing a wedge-shaped poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold as a backbone, followed by injection with the optimized MECM-based hydrogel (2%), which served as a cell delivery system. The hybrid scaffold (PCL-hydrogel) clearly yielded favorable biomechanical properties close to those of the native meniscus. Finally, PCL scaffold, PCL-hydrogel, and MFCs-loaded hybrid scaffold (PCL-hydrogel-MFCs) were implanted into the knee joints of New Zealand rabbits that underwent total medial meniscectomy. Six months postimplantation we found that the PCL-hydrogel-MFCs group exhibited markedly better gross appearance and cartilage protection than the PCL scaffold and PCL-hydrogel groups. Moreover, the regenerated menisci in the PCL-hydrogel-MFCs group had similar histological structures, biochemical contents, and biomechanical properties as the native menisci in the sham operation group. In conclusion, PCL-MECM-based hydrogel hybrid scaffold seeded with MFCs can successfully promote whole meniscus regeneration, and cell-loaded PCL-MECM-based hydrogel hybrid scaffold may be a promising strategy for meniscus regeneration in the future.

Long-term Evaluation of Meniscal Tissue Formation in 3-dimensional-Printed Scaffolds With Sequential Release of Connective Tissue Growth Factor and TGF-β3 in an Ovine Model

BACKGROUND

Artificial meniscal scaffolds are being developed to prevent development of osteoarthritis after meniscectomy. Previously, it was reported that 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic scaffolds loaded with connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and transforming growth factor β3 (TGF-β3) achieved meniscal regeneration in an ovine model. This was a relatively short-term study (3 months postoperative), and outcome analyses did not include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term outcome of meniscal replacement with growth factor-laden poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) scaffolds.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Anatomically shaped ovine meniscal scaffolds were fabricated from PCL with a 3D printer based on MRI data. Skeletally mature sheep (N = 34) were randomly allocated to 3 groups: scaffold without growth factor (0-µg group), scaffold with CTGF microspheres (µS) (5 µg) + TGF-β3 µS (5 µg) (5-µg group), and scaffold with CTGF µS (10 µg) + TGF-β3 µS (10 µg) (10-µg group). Unilateral medial meniscal replacement was performed. Animals were euthanized at 6 or 12 months. Regenerated meniscus, articular cartilage status, and synovial reaction were evaluated quantitatively with gross inspection, histology, and MRI. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests were used to compare the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Remnants of the PCL scaffold were evident in the 6-month specimens and were decreased but still present at 12 months in most animals. There were no significant differences among groups in gross inspection, histology, or MRI for either meniscal regeneration or articular cartilage protection. All experimental groups exhibited articular cartilage degeneration as compared with control (nonoperated). In terms of synovitis, there were no clear differences among groups, suggesting that growth factors did not increase inflammation and fibrosis. MRI revealed that meniscal extrusion was observed in most animals (82.7%).

CONCLUSION

Previously, the combination of CTGF and TGF-β3 was shown to stimulate mesenchymal stem cells into a fibrochondrocyte lineage. CTGF and TGF-β3 did not aggravate synovitis, suggesting no adverse response to the combination of 3D-printed PCL scaffold combined with CTGF and TGF-β3. Further work will be required to improve scaffold fixation to avoid meniscal extrusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A significant advantage of this technique is the ability to print custom-fit scaffolds from MRI-generated templates. In addition, average-size menisci could be printed and available for off-the-shelf applications. Based on the 1-year duration of the study, the approach appears to be promising for meniscal regeneration in humans.

Similar clinical outcomes following collagen or polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature in an effort to assess specific clinical outcomes following meniscal scaffold implantation using the two available scaffolds: Collagen Meniscal Implant (CMI) and the Actifit polyurethane meniscal scaffold.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to find studies evaluating clinical outcomes of patients undergoing meniscal scaffold implantation. Search terms used were "meniscus", "meniscal", "scaffold", and "implant". Studies were evaluated based on scaffold type, treatment failure rates, patient-reported outcome scores, concomitant procedures, and radiological findings. Radiological findings were recorded using the Genovese scale to assess morphology and signal intensity and the Yulish score to assess articular cartilage.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (1 level I, 1 level II, 17 level IV evidence) were identified that met inclusion criteria, including a total of 658 patients (347 Actifit, 311 CMI). The overall average follow-up was 45 months. Treatment failure occurred in 9.9% of patients receiving the Actifit scaffold at a mean follow-up of 40 months and 6.7% of patients receiving CMI at a mean follow-up of 44 months (n.s.). However, the rate of failure ranged from 0 to 31.8% amongst the included studies with a variable definition of failure. Additionally, overlapping patients and presence of concomitant surgeries such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) may have a significant influence on these results. Outcomes for the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity score improved from preoperatively to latest follow-up in both groups, while the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and International Knee Documentation Committee scores improved from preoperatively to latest follow-up for Actifit scaffold patients. Overall, patients receiving CMI scaffolds had higher grades for Genovese morphology and signal intensity when compared to Actifit scaffold patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing meniscal scaffold implantation with either CMI or Actifit scaffold can both be expected to experience improvement in clinical outcomes when used in association with concomitant procedures such as ACLR and HTO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.

Chondrocyte-based intraoperative processing strategies for the biological augmentation of a polyurethane meniscus replacement

Purpose/aim of study: Menisectomies account for over 1.5 million surgical interventions in Europe annually, and there is a growing interest in regenerative strategies to improve outcomes in meniscal replacement. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the role of intraoperatively applied fresh chondrocyte (FC) isolates compared to minced cartilage (MC) fragments, used without cell isolation, to improve bioactivity and tissue integration when combined with a polyurethane replacement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, to optimize the intraoperative cell isolation protocol, caprine articular cartilage biopsies were digested with 750 U/ml or 3000 U/ml collagenase type II (ratio of 10 ml per g of tissue) for 30 min, 1 h or 12 h with constant agitation and compared to culture-expanded chondrocytes in terms of matrix deposition when cultured on polyurethane scaffolds. Finally, FCs and MC-augmented polyurethane scaffolds were evaluated in a caprine meniscal explant model to assess the potential enhancements on tissue integration strength.

RESULTS

Adequate numbers of FCs were harvested using a 30 min chondrocyte isolation protocol and were found to demonstrate improved matrix deposition compared to standard culture-expanded cells in vitro. Upon evaluation in a meniscus explant defect model, both FCs and MC showed improved matrix deposition at the tissue-scaffold interface and enhanced push-out strength, fourfold and 2.5-fold, respectively, compared with the acellular implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, we have demonstrated a novel approach that could be applied intraoperatively, using FCs or MC for improved tissue integration with a polyurethane meniscal replacement.

The Radiated Deep-frozen Xenogenic Meniscal Tissue Regenerated the Total Meniscus with Chondroprotection

Meniscal allograft transplantation yields good and excellent results but is limited by donor availability. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiated deep-frozen xenogenic meniscal tissue (RDF-X) as an alternative graft choice in meniscal transplantation. The xenogenic meniscal tissues were harvested from the inner 1/3 part of the porcine meniscus and then irradiated and deeply frozen. The medial menisci of rabbits were replaced by the RDF-X. Meniscal allograft transplantation, meniscectomy and sham operation served as controls. Only a particular kind of rabbit-anti-pig antibody (molecular ranging 60–80 kD) was detected in the blood serum at week 2. The menisci of the group RDF-X grossly resembled the native tissue and the allograft meniscus with fibrocartilage regeneration at postoperative 1 year. Cell incorporation and the extracellular matrix were mostly observed at the surface and the inner 1/3 part of the newly regenerated RDF-X, which was different from the allograft. The biomechanical properties of the group RDF-X were also approximate to those of the native meniscus except for the compressive creep. In addition, chondroprotection was achieved after the RDF-X transplantation although the joint degeneration was not completely prevented. To conclude, the RDF-X could be a promising alternative for meniscal transplantation with similar tissue regeneration capacity to allograft transplantation and superior chondroprotection. The potential minor immunological rejection should be further studied before its clinical application.

An electrospun fiber reinforced scaffold promotes total meniscus regeneration in rabbit meniscectomy model

Low vascularization in meniscus limits its regeneration ability after injury, and tissue engineering is the most promising method to achieve meniscus regeneration. In this study, we fabricated a kind of composite scaffold by decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix/polycaprolactone (DMECM/PCL) electrospinning fibers and porous DMECM, in which DMECM/PCL fibers were used as reinforcing component. The tensile modulus of the composite scaffold in longitudinal and crosswise directions were 8.5 ± 1.9 and 2.3 ± 0.3 MPa, respectively. Besides that, the DMECM/PCL electrospinning fibers enhanced suture resistance of the composite scaffold more than 5 times than DMECM scaffold effectively. In vitro cytocompatibility showed that the porous structure provided by DMECM component facilitated meniscus cells' proliferation. DMECM was also the main component to regulate cell behaviors, which promoted meniscus cells expressing extracellular matrix related genes such as COL I, COL II, SOX9 and AGG. Rabbits with total meniscectomy were used as animal model to evaluated the composited scaffolds performance in vivo at 3 and 6 months. Results showed that rabbits with scaffold implanting could regenerate neo-menisci in both time points. The neo-menisci had similar histology structure and biochemical content with native menisci. Although neo-menisci had inferior tensile modulus than native ones, its modulus was improved with implanting time prolonging. MRI imaging showed the signal of neo-meniscus in the body is clear, and X-ray imaging of knee joints demonstrated the implantation of scaffolds could relief joint space narrowing. Moreover, rabbits with neo-menisci had better cartilage condition in femoral condyle and tibial plateau compared than meniscectomy group.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

We fabricated the meniscus scaffold by combining porous decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix (DMECM) and DMECM/PCL electrospinning fibers together, which used the porous structure of DMECM, and the good tensile property of electrospinning fibers. We believe single material cannot satisfy increasing needs of scaffold. Therefore, we combined not only materials but also fabrication methods together to develop scaffold to make good use of each part. DMECM in electrospinning fibers also made these two components possible to be integrated through crosslinking. Compared to existing meniscus scaffold, the composite scaffold had (1) soft structure and extrusion would not happen after implantation, (2) ability to be trimmed to suitable shape during surgery, and (3) good resistance to suture.

Modern treatment of meniscal tears

The complex ultrastructure of the meniscus determines its vital functions for the knee, the lower extremity, and the body.

The most recent concise, reliable, and valid classification system for meniscal tears is the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) Classification, which takes into account the subsequent parameters: tear depth, tear pattern, tear length, tear location/rim width, radial location, location according to the popliteal hiatus, and quality of the meniscal tissue.

It is the orthopaedic surgeon’s responsibility to combine clinical information, radiological images, and clinical experience in an effort to individualize management of meniscal tears, taking into account factors related to the patient and lesion.

Surgeons should strive not to operate in most cases, but to protect, repair or reconstruct, in order to prevent early development of osteoarthritis by restoring the native structure, function, and biomechanics of the meniscus.

Currently, there are three main methods of modern surgical management of meniscus tears: arthroscopic partial meniscectomy; meniscal repair with or without augmentation techniques; and meniscal reconstruction. Meniscus surgery has come a long way from the old slogan, “If it is torn, take it out!” to the currently accepted slogan, “Save the meniscus!” which has guided evolving modern treatment methods for meniscal tears. This last slogan will probably constitute the basis for newer alternative biological treatment methods in the future.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170067.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Functional Outcomes After a Polyurethane Meniscal Scaffold Implantation: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

To report the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up in a series of patients with postmeniscectomy syndrome and treated with a polyurethane scaffold.

METHODS

All consecutive patients operated on from September 2008 to February 2011 for either persistent medial or lateral joint line compartmental pain receiving a polyurethane scaffold due to a previous partial meniscus resection with a minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Functional scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner) were assessed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The state of the scaffold as well as postoperative scaffold extrusion and the total remaining meniscal volume was also evaluated in MRI.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included. The mean follow-up was 70.8 ± 7.5 months. The functionality of the knees improved in all the scores used (P < .001) except for the Tegner score that stayed steady. Most of meniscal implants showed extrusion of 2.4 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.7) were smaller and a hyperintensity signal was seen in the MRI. Three scaffolds were resorbed at the last follow-up. The meniscal volume, determined by MRI, was 1.14 cm³ (95% CI, 0.96-1.31) preoperatively and 1.61 cm³ (95% CI, 1.43-1.7) at the last follow-up. No differences were presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold in patients with a symptomatic meniscus deficit had a good functional outcome at 5 years after surgery. However, the implanted scaffolds did not present normal meniscal tissue with MRI, and the implant volume was considerably less than expected. The fact that most of patients included received different concomitant procedures during scaffold implantation introduces a degree of performance bias into the results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Biomechanical performance of the Actifit® scaffold is significantly improved by selection of irrigation fluid

PURPOSE

Clinical reports on meniscal scaffolds seem promising, albeit relatively paucity exists regarding their biomechanical behavior. The aim of the study is to delineate the impact of differing suture materials and the type as well as the temperature of the irrigation fluid on the pull-out strength of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold (Actifit^®).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

128 specimens were utilized with horizontal sutures and uniaxial load-to-failure testing was performed. We compared two different suture materials-polydioxanone (PDS) and non-absorbable, braided polyester sutures (NABP)-as well as two common irrigation fluids-lactated Ringer's and electrolyte-free, hypotonic Mannitol-Sorbitol. All specimens were further evaluated according to two different temperatures [room temperature (20 °C) and near-core body temperature (37 °C)].

RESULTS

Mean load-to-failure was 53.3 ± 6.5 N. There was no significant difference between the NABP and the PDS group. Ringer group showed a significantly higher load-to-failure compared to Purisole (P = .0002). This was equivalent for both PDS (P = .0008) and NABP sutures (P = .0008). Significantly higher failure loads could be established for the 37° group (P = .041); yet, this difference was neither confirmed for the PDS or in in the NABP subgroup. Only the subgroup using Purisole at 37° showed significantly higher failure loads compared to 20° (P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the potential to improve pull-out strength during implantation of an Actifit^® scaffold by alteration of the type of irrigation fluid. Lactated Ringer solution provided the highest construct stability in regard to load-to-failure testing and should be considered whenever implantation of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold is conducted.

Current perspectives on biological approaches for osteoarthritis

Musculoskeletal injuries that disrupt the structure and function of diarthrodial joints can cause permanent biomechanical alterations and lead to a more severe, chronic condition. Despite advancements that have been made to restore tissue function and delay the need for joint replacement, there are currently no disease-modifying therapies for osteoarthritis (OA). To reduce the risk of OA, innovative preventive medicine approaches have been developed over the last decade to treat the underlying pathology. Several biological approaches are promising treatment modalities for various stages of OA owing to their minimally invasive nature and actively dynamic physiological mechanisms that attenuate tissue degradation and inflammatory responses. Individualized growth factor and cytokine therapies, tissue-engineered biomaterials, and cell-based therapies have revolutionary potential for orthopedic applications; however, the paucity of standardization and categorization of biological components and their counterparts has made it difficult to determine their clinical and biological efficacy. Cell-based therapies and tissue-engineered biologics have become lucrative in sports medicine and orthopedics; nonetheless, there is a continued effort to produce a biological treatment modality tailored to target intra-articular structures that recapitulates tissue function. Advanced development of these biological treatment modalities will potentially optimize tissue healing, regeneration, and joint preservation strategies. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review current concepts on several biological treatment approaches for OA.

Meniscus ECM-functionalised hydrogels containing infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells for bioprinting of regionally defined meniscal tissue

Injuries to the meniscus of the knee commonly lead to osteoarthritis. Current therapies for meniscus regeneration, including meniscectomies and scaffold implantation, fail to achieve complete functional regeneration of the tissue. This has led to increased interest in cell and gene therapies and tissue engineering approaches to meniscus regeneration. The implantation of a biomimetic implant, incorporating cells, growth factors, and extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived proteins, represents a promising approach to functional meniscus regeneration. The objective of this study was to develop a range of ECM-functionalised bioinks suitable for 3D bioprinting of meniscal tissue. To this end, alginate hydrogels were functionalised with ECM derived from the inner and outer regions of the meniscus and loaded with infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells. In the absence of exogenously supplied growth factors, inner meniscus ECM promoted chondrogenesis of fat pad-derived stem cells, whereas outer meniscus ECM promoted a more elongated cell morphology and the development of a more fibroblastic phenotype. With exogenous growth factors supplementation, a more fibrogenic phenotype was observed in outer ECM-functionalised hydrogels supplemented with connective tissue growth factor, whereas inner ECM-functionalised hydrogels supplemented with TGFβ3 supported the highest levels of Sox-9 and type II collagen gene expression and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG) deposition. The final phase of the study demonstrated the printability of these ECM-functionalised hydrogels, demonstrating that their codeposition with polycaprolactone microfibres dramatically improved the mechanical properties of the 3D bioprinted constructs with no noticeable loss in cell viability. These bioprinted constructs represent an exciting new approach to tissue engineering of functional meniscal grafts.

Biomechanical performance of a collagen meniscus implant with regard to suture material and irrigation fluid

BACKGROUND

The role of meniscus scaffolds remains controversial as failure rates remain high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pullout strength of different suture materials used for fixation of the Collagen Meniscus Implant (CMI) regarding different suture materials, and type or temperature of irrigation fluid.

METHODS

One-hundred and twelve specimens were utilized with horizontal sutures and mounted to a dedicated test device. Loads were applied perpendicular to the CMI, until failure. Two differing suture materials - polydioxanone (PDS) and non-absorbable, braided polyester sutures (NABP) - were evaluated. Additionally, two common irrigation fluids - lactated Ringer's and electrolyte-free, hypotonic Mannitol-Sorbitol solution - were evaluated. Specimens were further evaluated according to different temperatures of the irrigation fluid. Half of the constructs were tested at room temperature (20°C) and half were evaluated at near-core body temperature (37°C).

RESULTS

PDS sutures showed a significantly higher load-to-failure compared to NABP sutures (P=0.0008). Regarding the type of irrigation fluid, the electrolyte-free Mannitol-Sorbitol solution showed a significantly higher load-to-failure compared to the overall Ringer group (P b 0.0001). This was equivalent for both the PDS (P=0.015) and for the NABP sutures (P b 0.0001). The temperature of the irrigation fluid did not significantly influence load-to-failure.

CONCLUSIONS

PDS sutures and electrolyte-free Mannitol-Sorbitol irrigation fluid provided the best biomechanical properties regarding load-to-failure testing. This study underlines the potential to improve construct stability for the CMI by alteration of the suture material and the type of irrigation fluid, which should be considered whenever scaffold fixation is conducted.

3D-Printed Poly(ε-caprolactone) Scaffold Augmented With Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Total Meniscal Substitution: A 12- and 24-Week Animal Study in a Rabbit Model

BACKGROUND

Total meniscectomy leads to knee osteoarthritis in the long term. The poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold is a promising material for meniscal tissue regeneration, but cell-free scaffolds result in relatively poor tissue regeneration and lead to joint degeneration.

HYPOTHESIS

A novel, 3-dimensional (3D)-printed PCL scaffold augmented with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) would offer benefits in meniscal regeneration and cartilage protection.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

PCL meniscal scaffolds were 3D printed and seeded with bone marrow-derived MSCs. Seventy-two New Zealand White rabbits were included and were divided into 4 groups: cell-seeded scaffold, cell-free scaffold, sham operation, and total meniscectomy alone. The regeneration of the implanted tissue and the degeneration of articular cartilage were assessed by gross and microscopic (histological and scanning electron microscope) analysis at 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively. The mechanical properties of implants were also evaluated (tensile and compressive testing).

RESULTS

Compared with the cell-free group, the cell-seeded scaffold showed notably better gross appearance, with a shiny white color and a smooth surface. Fibrochondrocytes with extracellular collagen type I, II, and III and proteoglycans were found in both seeded and cell-free scaffold implants at 12 and 24 weeks, while the results were significantly better for the cell-seeded group at week 24. Furthermore, the cell-seeded group presented notably lower cartilage degeneration in both femur and tibia compared with the cell-free or meniscectomy group. Both the tensile and compressive properties of the implants in the cell-seeded group were significantly increased compared with those of the cell-free group.

CONCLUSION

Seeding MSCs in the PCL scaffold increased its fibrocartilaginous tissue regeneration and mechanical strength, providing a functional replacement to protect articular cartilage from damage after total meniscectomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The study suggests the potential of the novel 3D PCL scaffold augmented with MSCs as an alternative meniscal substitution, although this approach requires further improvement before being used in clinical practice.

MR imaging of the anatomy of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus

Background In cadaveric and arthroscopic studies different insertion locations of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus (AHMM) have been described. Purpose To investigate if the different insertion locations of the AHMM, as described in cadaveric studies, can be determined on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Material and Methods MR images of 100 patients without meniscal tears on MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Two observers classified the AHMM insertion based on its position relative to the anterior tibial edge and the medial tibial spine. The association between AHMM insertion and tibial plateau slope, meniscal radial displacement, and anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIL) presence was investigated. Results The AHMM inserted posterior to the anterior tibial edge in 93 knees and anterior to the tibial edge in seven knees (= type III). Of the 93 knees with AHMM insertion posterior to the anterior tibial edge, 63 inserted lateral to the medial tibial spine (= type I) and 30 medial (= type II). The AHMMs inserting anterior to the tibial edge had a significantly ( P < 0.05) steeper anterior tibial plateau slope and a significantly ( P < 0.05) higher presence of the AIL. No significant difference in radial displacement was observed between the three insertion types ( P > 0.05). A strong inter- and intra-observer agreement was observed. Conclusion Three different bony insertion locations of the AHMM, as described in cadaveric studies, could be identified on MRI. All AHMMs inserting anterior to the tibial edge displayed an AIL. Whether there is a clinical correlation with these insertion patterns remains unclear.

The Genovese grading scale is not reliable for MR assessment of collagen meniscus implants

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliabilities of the Genovese grading on MRI in patients after collagen meniscus substitution.

METHODS

84 MRI images of 74 consecutive patients who underwent partial meniscus substitution using collagen meniscus implant (CMI) were assessed. MRIs were evaluated using the Genovese grading system. Furthermore, meniscal extrusion was assessed. Two observers performed the grading twice, blinded to each other and to the previous results, with a six weeks interval. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were assessed using kappa and weighted kappa values.

RESULTS

The criterion "morphology/size" showed a weighted kappa value inter-observer reliability of 0.069 (rater 1)/0.352 (rater 2) and intra-observer reliability of 0.170 (1st rating)/0.582 (2nd rating). The criterion "signal intensity" showed a weighted kappa value inter-observer reliability of 0.175/0.284 and intra-observer reliability of 0.294/0.458. The criterion "cartilage lesions" showed a kappa value inter-observer reliability of 0.091/0.525 and intra-observer reliability of 0.409/0.413. The criterion "bone marrow edema" showed a kappa value inter-observer reliability of 0.667/0.808 and intra-observer reliability of 0.702/0.715. The criterion "cartilage lesions" showed a kappa value inter-observer reliability of 0.091/0.525 and intra-observer reliability of 0.409/0.413. Regarding meniscal extrusion kappa values for the inter-observer reliability were 0.625/0.940 and 0.625/0.889 for intra-observer reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Three of the four Genovese grading items showed only slight to moderate inter- and intra-observer reliabilities in evaluating CMI on MRI. Hence, such grading results need to be considered with all due care. Only the criteria "bone marrow edema" and "meniscal extrusion" showed a good agreement for both inter- and intra-observer reliabilities.

Treatment of Painful, Irreparable Partial Meniscal Defects With a Polyurethane Scaffold: Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Survival Analysis

BACKGROUND

A biodegradable polyurethane scaffold was designed to fulfill a challenging clinical need in the treatment of patients with painful, irreparable partial meniscal defects.

HYPOTHESIS

The use of an acellular polyurethane scaffold for new tissue generation in irreparable, partial meniscal defects provides both midterm pain relief and improved functionality.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients with irreparable, partial meniscal defects (29 medial and 15 lateral) were implanted with a polyurethane scaffold in a prospective, single-arm proof-of-principle study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at baseline and at 2- and 5-year follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the meniscal implant and cartilage status of the index compartment. Kaplan-Meier time-to-treatment failure distributions were also performed. Removal of the scaffold, conversion to a meniscal transplant, or unicompartmental/total knee arthroplasty was used as endpoints.

RESULTS

Seven patients were lost to follow-up (15.9%). The patients who participated in this study showed significant clinical improvement after surgery (mean [±SD] at baseline, 2 years, and 5 years: 56.2 ± 21.6, 24.6 ± 22.7, and 19.3 ± 26.9, respectively [VAS]; 206.5 ± 79.7, 329.8 ± 108.9, and 333.6 ± 112.2, respectively [total KOOS]). MRI of the scaffolds showed a smaller sized implant when compared with the native meniscus with an irregular surface at 2- and 5-year follow-up. A stable cartilage status of the index compartment at 5-year follow-up was demonstrated in 46.7% of patients compared with the baseline status. During the follow-up period, 62.2% of the implants survived. At final follow-up, 66.7% of the medial scaffolds were still functioning versus 53.8% of the lateral scaffolds.

CONCLUSION

A polyurethane meniscal implant can improve knee joint function and significantly reduce pain in patients with segmental meniscus deficiency up to 5 years after implantation. A stable cartilage status of the index compartment at 5-year follow-up was demonstrated in 46.7% of patients, calling into question the chondroprotective ability of the implant. In addition, a relatively high failure rate was noticed. Long-term and randomized controlled studies are mandatory to confirm the initial results and the reliability of this procedure.

Advances in combining gene therapy with cell and tissue engineering-based approaches to enhance healing of the meniscus

Meniscal lesions are common problems in orthopaedic surgery and sports medicine, and injury or loss of the meniscus accelerates the onset of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Despite a variety of therapeutic options in the clinics, there is a critical need for improved treatments to enhance meniscal repair. In this regard, combining gene-, cell-, and tissue engineering-based approaches is an attractive strategy to generate novel, effective therapies to treat meniscal lesions. In the present work, we provide an overview of the tools currently available to improve meniscal repair and discuss the progress and remaining challenges for potential future translation in patients.

The role of meniscal tissue in joint protection in early osteoarthritis

It is widely accepted that partial meniscectomy leads to early onset of osteoarthritis (OA). A strong correlation exists between the amount and location of the resected meniscus and the development of degenerative changes in the knee. On the other hand, osteoarthritic changes of the joint alter the structural and functional integrity of meniscal tissue. These alterations might additionally compromise the limited healing capacity of the meniscus. In young, active patients without cartilage damage, meniscus therapy including partial meniscectomy, meniscus suture, and meniscus replacement has proven beneficial effects in long-term studies. Even in an early osteoarthritic milieu, there is a relevant regenerative potential of the meniscus and the surrounding cartilage. This potential should be taken into account, and meniscal surgery can be performed with the correct timing and the proper indication even in the presence of early OA.

Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement

OBJECTIVE

the menisci are easily injured and difficult to repair. The aim of this study was to analyze the current state of meniscal surgery aimed at preserving morphology and conserving the biomechanics of the knee to prevent joint degeneration.

METHODOLOGY

a search of the electronic medical literature database Medline was conducted, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. The search was not limited by language. Candidate articles were identified by searching for those that included the keywords meniscus, surgery, suture, implant, allograft. The limits were included for clinical research and clinical trials. Basic research was not included. The studies selected were evaluated and classified in three different categories: basic science, reconstruction (suture and meniscectomy) and implants (scaffolds and allograft).

RESULTS

the consequences of meniscectomy performed at a young age can lead to a joint cartilage degeneration twenty years later. There are few surgical options for the repair of meniscal injuries in order both to preserve the meniscus and to ensure the long term survival of the knee joint, meniscectomy, repair, suturing the tear, or reconstruction, when a meniscal allograft or synthetic substitute is used to replace the meniscus, but the biomechanical properties of the native meniscus are not reproduced entirely by the scaffolds that exist today.

CONCLUSION

therapies that successfully repair or replace the meniscus are therefore likely to prevent or delay osteoarthritis progression.

Clinical Application of Scaffolds for Partial Meniscus Replacement

Meniscal tears are common injuries often treated by partial meniscectomy. This may result in altered joint contact mechanics which in turn may lead to worsening symptoms and an increased risk of osteoarthritis. Meniscal scaffolds have been proposed as a treatment option aimed at reducing symptoms while also potentially reducing progression of degenerative change. There are 2 scaffolds available for clinical use at the present time; Collagen Meniscus Implant and Actifit. Medium-term to long-term data (4.9 to 11.3 y) demonstrate efficacy of partial meniscus replacement. The patients who seem to benefit most are chronic postmeniscectomy rather than acute meniscal injuries. Herein we report on available clinical data for Collagen Meniscus Implant and Actifit while describing our preferred surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation program.

Midterm follow-up after implantation of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold for segmental medial meniscus loss: maintenance of good clinical and MRI outcome

PURPOSE

The preservation of meniscal structure and function after segmental meniscal loss is of crucial importance to prevent early development of osteoarthritis. Implantation of artificial meniscal implants has been reported as a feasible treatment option. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results 4 years after implantation of a polyurethane scaffold for chronic segmental medial meniscus deficiency following partial medial meniscectomy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients received arthroscopic implantation of an Actifit(®) polyurethane meniscal implant (Orteq Sports Medicine, London, UK) for deficiency of the medial meniscus. Patients were followed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months. Clinical outcome was assessed using established patient-reported outcome scores (KOOS, KSS, UCLA Activity Scale, VAS for pain). Radiological outcome was quantified by MRI scans after 6, 12, 24, and 48 months evaluating scaffold morphology, tissue integration, and status of the articular cartilage as well as signs of inflammation.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 32.5 years (range 17-49 years) with a median meniscal defect size of 44.5 mm (range 35-62 mm). Continuing improvement of the VAS and KSS Knee and Function Scores could be observed after 48 months compared to baseline, whereas improvement of the activity level according to UCLA continued only up to 24 months and decreased from there on. The KOOS Score showed significant improvement in all dimensions. MRI scans showed reappearance of bone bruises in two patients with scaffold extrusion. No significant changes in the articular cartilage could be perceived.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic treatment for patients with chronic segmental meniscal loss using a polyurethane meniscal implant can achieve sustainable midterm results regarding pain reduction and knee function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

One-Year Outcomes of Total Meniscus Reconstruction Using a Novel Fiber-Reinforced Scaffold in an Ovine Model

BACKGROUND

Meniscus injuries and resulting meniscectomies lead to joint deterioration, causing pain, discomfort, and instability. Tissue-engineered devices to replace the meniscus have not shown consistent success with regard to function, mechanical integrity, or protection of cartilage.

PURPOSE

To evaluate a novel resorbable polymer fiber-reinforced meniscus reconstruction scaffold in an ovine model for 52 weeks and assess its integrity, tensile and compressive mechanics, cell phenotypes, matrix organization and content, and protection of the articular cartilage surfaces.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight skeletally mature ewes were implanted with the fiber-reinforced scaffold after total meniscectomy, and 2 additional animals had untreated total meniscectomies. Animals were sacrificed at 52 weeks, and the explants and articular surfaces were analyzed macroscopically. Explants were characterized by ultimate tensile testing, confined compression creep testing, and biochemical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Cartilage damage was characterized using the Mankin score on histologic slides from both the femur and tibia.

RESULTS

One sheep was removed from the study because of a torn extensor tendon; the remaining 7 explants remained fully intact and incorporated into the bone tunnels. All explants exhibited functional tensile loads, tensile stiffnesses, and compressive moduli. Fibrocartilagenous repair with both types 1 and 2 collagen were observed, with areas of matrix organization and biochemical content similar to native tissue. Narrowing in the body region was observed in 5 of 7 explants. Mankin scores showed less cartilage damage in the explant group (femoral condyle: 3.43 ± 0.79, tibial plateau: 3.50 ± 1.63) than in the meniscectomy group (femoral condyle: 8.50 ± 3.54, tibial plateau: 6.75 ± 2.47) and were comparable with Mankin scores at the previously reported 16- and 32-week time points.

CONCLUSION

A resorbable fiber-reinforced meniscus scaffold supports formation of functional neomeniscus tissue, with the potential to prevent joint degeneration that typically occurs after total meniscectomy. Further studies with improvements to the initial mechanics of the scaffold and testing for longer time periods are warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Meniscectomy is an extremely common orthopaedic procedure, and few options currently exist for the treatment of significant loss of meniscus tissue. Successful development of a tissue-engineered meniscus scaffold could substantially reduce the incidence of postmeniscectomy joint degeneration and the subsequent procedures used for its treatment.

Long-term outcomes of medial CMI implant versus partial medial meniscectomy in patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical, objective and radiographic long-term results of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesion and partial medial meniscus defects, treated with ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy or medial CMI implant.

METHODS

Seventeen patients treated with combined ACL reconstruction and medial CMI and 17 patients treated with ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy were evaluated with mean follow-up 9.6 years with Lysholm, Tegner, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and VAS for pain. Arthrometric evaluation was performed with KT 2000. Weigh-bearing radiographs, antero-posterior and Rosenberg view, were also performed and evaluated with Kellgren-Lawrence score, Ahlback score and joint space narrowing.

RESULTS

Pre-operative demographic parameters and clinical scores between patients treated with CMI and partial medial meniscectomy revealed no significant differences. A significant improvement of all the clinical scores was detected in both groups from pre-operative status to final follow-up. No significant difference between groups were found for clinical and radiographic scores; however, the chronic subgroup of patients treated with CMI showed a significantly lower level of post-operative knee pain compared to patients treated with partial medial meniscectomy and the acute subgroup of medial CMI showed better arthrometric scores.

CONCLUSION

Good long-term clinical results in terms of stability, subjective outcomes and objective evaluation were reported both for medial CMI implant and partial medial meniscectomy, combined with ACL reconstruction for the treatment of partial medial meniscus tears combined with ACL lesions. Chronic meniscal tears treated with medial CMI reported lower levels of post-operative pain compared to meniscectomy, while acute lesions treated with medial CMI showed less knee laxity. Therefore, the use of the collagen meniscus implant in the case of anterior knee instability with a meniscal defect appears justified and able to improve clinical outcomes in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

MRI evaluation of a collagen meniscus implant: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Good clinical results have been demonstrated in numerous clinical studies using the collagen meniscus implant (CMI); however, the MRI behaviour of the scaffold, evaluated with Genovese score, is limited to a few cases series. The purpose was to evaluate, using the Genovese score, the MRI behaviour of the CMI at different follow-up periods and investigate possible differences in the behaviour of lateral and medial CMI.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of the following keywords: "collagen meniscus implant" or "collagen meniscal implant". All the studies evaluating medial or lateral CMI using Genovese score for MRI were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Six studies have been included in the systematic review, with no RCT's. The pooled number of patients involved in CMI surgery was 194 (83 % medial and 17 % lateral), with a mean age at surgery of 37.7 years. Concomitant procedures raged from 11 to 52 %. CMI morphology was grade 1 in 0, 2.7, 5.9, 0, 16.7 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years. It was grade 2 in 12.5, 60.9, 60.3, 74.4, 75 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years and grade 3 in 87.5, 36.4, 33.8, 25.6, 8.3 % at the same time points. CMI signal intensity was grade 1 in 80, 18.2, 25, 11.1, 22.2 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years. It was grade 2 in 20, 78.2, 54.7, 55.6, 66.7 %, respectively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 5, 10 years and grade 3 in 0, 3.6, 20.3, 33.3, 11.1 % at the same time points. Slight differences were found between medial and lateral CMI in size and signal intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher rates of scaffolds with reduced size and with an MRI signal intensity more similar to normal meniscus were reported at longer follow-up compared with initial evaluations. Correlation between MRI findings and gross CMI appearance has not been reported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Successful Total Meniscus Reconstruction Using a Novel Fiber-Reinforced Scaffold: A 16- and 32-Week Study in an Ovine Model

BACKGROUND

Meniscus injuries in the United States result in an estimated 850,000 surgical procedures each year. Although meniscectomies are the most commonly performed orthopaedic surgery, little advancement has been made in meniscus replacement and regeneration, and there is currently no total meniscus replacement device approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

HYPOTHESIS

A novel fiber-reinforced meniscus scaffold can be used as a functional total meniscus replacement.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A tyrosine-derived, polymer fiber-reinforced collagen sponge meniscus scaffold was evaluated mechanically (tensile and compressive testing) and histologically after 16 and 32 weeks of implantation in an ovine total meniscectomy model (N = 20; 16 implants plus 4 meniscectomies, divided equally over the 2 time periods). The extent of cartilage damage was also measured on tibial plateaus by use of toluidine blue surface staining and on femoral condyles by use of Mankin scores on histological slides.

RESULTS

Scaffolds induced formation of neomeniscus tissue that remained intact and functional, with breaking loads approximating 250 N at both 16 and 32 weeks compared with 552 N for native menisci. Tensile stiffness values (99 and 74 N/mm at 16 and 32 weeks, respectively) were also comparable with those of the native meniscus (147 N/mm). The compressive modulus of the neomeniscus tissue (0.33 MPa at both 16 and 32 weeks) was significantly increased compared with unimplanted (time 0) scaffolds (0.15 MPa). There was histological evidence of extensive tissue ingrowth and extracellular matrix deposition, with immunohistochemical evidence of types I and II collagen. Based on significantly decreased surface damage scores as well as Mankin scores, the scaffold implants provided greater protection of articular cartilage compared with the untreated total meniscectomy.

CONCLUSION

This novel fiber-reinforced meniscus scaffold can act as a functional meniscus replacement, with mechanical properties similar to those of the native meniscus, while protecting the articular cartilage of the knee from the extensive damage after a total meniscectomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This meniscus replacement scaffold has the potential to improve surgical treatment and provide better long-term outcomes for those suffering from severe meniscus damage.

Cartilage repair in vivo: the role of migratory progenitor cells

The most common diseases of the joints and its tissues are osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, with osteoarthritis being anticipated to be the fourth leading cause of disability by the year 2020. To date, no truly causal therapies are available, and this has promoted tissue engineering attempts mainly involving mesenchymal stem cells. The goal of all tissue repairs would be to restore a fully functional tissue, here a hyaline articular cartilage. The hyaline cartilage is the most affected in osteoarthritis, where altered cell–matrix interactions gradually destroy tissue integrity. In rheumatoid arthritis, the inflammatory aspect is more important, and the cartilage tissue is destroyed by the invasion of tumor-like pannus tissue arising from the inflamed synovia. Furthermore, the fibrocartilage of the meniscus is clearly involved in the initiation of osteoarthritis, especially after trauma. Recent investigations have highlighted the role of migratory progenitor cells found in diseased tissues in situ. In osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, these chondrogenic progenitor cells are involved in regeneration efforts that are largely unsuccessful in diseased cartilage tissue. However, these progenitor cells are interesting targets for a cell-based regenerative therapy for joint diseases.

Resorbable collagen scaffolds for the treatment of meniscus defects: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and structural outcomes after resorbable collagen meniscus scaffold implantation through a systematic review of the published literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of both the PubMed and Embase databases was undertaken to identify all studies that reported clinical and/or structural outcomes after resorbable collagen meniscus scaffold implantation for the treatment of defects involving either the medial or lateral meniscus. Extracted data included study characteristics; surgical methods and rehabilitation protocols; objective outcomes; and preoperative and postoperative subjective outcome scores including Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, and visual analog scale scores.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in this review. There were 10 Level IV studies, 2 Level II studies, and 1 Level I study with follow-up intervals ranging from 3 months to 12.5 years. With a few exceptions, the study designs used in each study generally followed those which had been previously performed. Substantial differences in rehabilitation protocols and concomitant procedures were noted that may have had an effect on overall clinical outcomes. Objective findings were mostly consistent and typically showed minimal degenerative changes on postoperative radiographs, decreased signal intensity of the scaffold over time on magnetic resonance imaging, the presence of meniscus-like tissue at second-look arthroscopy, and good integration of new tissue as evidenced by histologic analysis of biopsy specimens. Most studies reported satisfactory clinical outcomes, and most patients showed substantial improvements in comparison with mean preoperative baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this systematic review, implantation of resorbable collagen scaffolds for the treatment of meniscus defects provides satisfactory clinical and structural outcomes in most cases. There is evidence that collagen meniscus scaffold implantation provides superior clinical outcomes when compared with partial meniscectomy alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I, II, and IV studies.

What is the best way to fix a polyurethane meniscal scaffold? A biomechanical evaluation of different fixation modes

PURPOSE

Ingrowth of meniscal tissue into a meniscal scaffold can be optimized by securely fixing the scaffold into the meniscal remnants. The purpose of this research was to test and compare commonly used suture types and suture materials to fix a meniscal scaffold.

METHODS

Forty fresh porcine menisci were used. All tests used the same polyurethane-based scaffold. The load to failure of horizontal, vertical and diagonal sutures with PDS 0 and with Ethibond 0, and diagonal sutures with Ultra Fast-Fix(®) and Sequent(®) to fix a meniscal scaffold were tested. Five tests were conducted for each configuration.

RESULTS

All constructs failed in the scaffold at a mean pullout force of 50.6 N (SD 12.7). Inferior results were noted for vertical sutures (40.1 N, SD 6.3) compared to horizontal (49.8 N, SD 5.5, p = 0.0007) and diagonal (51.7 N, SD 15.6, p = 0.024) sutures and for Ethibond 0 (41.4 N, SD 6.2) compared to PDS 0 (51.3 N, SD 12.9, p = 0.001). When comparing the diagonal suture placements, only Ethibond 0 (42.9 N, SD 5.4) showed significantly inferior results compared to PDS 0 (60.1 N, SD 16.9, p = 0.03), Ultra Fast-Fix(®) (60.1 N, SD 9.3, p = 0.004) and Sequent(®) (65.8 N, SD 4.4, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common failure mode when fixing a polyurethane-based meniscal scaffold is suture pull-through of the scaffold in the distraction mode. This happens at a rather low pullout force and might preclude the use of this scaffold clinically. Vertical sutures and Ethibond 0 multifilament braided sutures fail at lower forces, and the tested commercial devices show promising results.