A retrospective study of the midterm outcome of two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled semitendinosus tendon in comparison with one-bundle reconstruction

Risk of overconstraining femorotibial rotation after anatomical ACL reconstruction using bone patella tendon bone autograft

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have focused on the anteroposterior stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with less emphasis on rotational stability. It has been hypothesized that bone patella tendon bone (BTB) autograft for ACL reconstruction restores knee rotation closely to normal due to its comparable fiber orientation to the native ACL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with unilateral ACL rupture and an uninjured contralateral knee were included in this study. The ACL was reconstructed using the medial third of the patellar tendon. Tunnel placement was controlled by fluoroscopy. Implant-free press-fit graft fixation was used on both femoral and tibial side. Bone blocks were carefully placed to restore fiber orientation of both the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle, similar to the native ACL. Rotatory laxity of both knees was measured at 0° and 25° of flexion pre- and post-surgery, using an active opto-electronical motion-analysis system (LUKOTRONIC AS 100^®). All measurements were performed under general anesthesia during surgery.

RESULTS

Knee rotation was reduced significantly in both 0°and 25° of flexion following ACL reconstruction (p < 0.001). The side to side difference (SSD) of the rotatory laxity in extension was greater in the ACL-deficient knee (14.9° ± 8.9°), but decreased significantly after ACL reconstruction (- 5.9° ± 7.7°, minus value means less than in the uninjured knee). There was a similar finding at 25° of knee flexion where greater rotation of the ACL-deficient knee (5.7° ± 10.3°) prior to surgery changed to lower degree of rotation after surgery (- 11.3° ± 8.4°) in comparison to the uninjured knee.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft in anatomical position using press-fit implant-free fixation is able to restore rotatory knee stability close to the intact contralateral knee. Despite the fact that the BTB graft offers fiber orientation close to the natural ACL, the surgeon should be aware of the potential risk of over-constraining the knee in terms of rotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of anterior cruciate ligament injury - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

This clinical guideline presents recommendations for the management of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, endorsed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS).

METHODS

The JOA ACL guideline committee revised the previous guideline based on "Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014", which proposed a desirable method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan. Furthermore, the importance of "the balance of benefit and harm" was also emphasized. This guideline consists of 21 clinical questions (CQ) and 23 background questions (BQ). For each CQ, outcomes from the literature were collected and evaluated systematically according to the adopted study design.

RESULTS

We evaluated the objectives and results of each study in order to make a decision on the level of evidence so as to integrate the results with our recommendations for each CQ. For BQ, the guideline committee proposed recommendations based on the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline is intended to be used by physicians, orthopedic surgeons, physical therapists, and athletic trainers managing ACL injuries. We hope that this guideline is useful for appropriate decision-making and improved management of ACL injuries.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years Using Adjustable Suspensory Fixation in Both the Femur and Tibia: A Prospective Study

Background:

The success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires reliable and rigid graft fixation. Cortical suspensory fixation (CSF) devices have become an acceptable alternative to interference screws for soft tissue ACL grafts. However, CSF devices have been reported to be associated with tunnel widening and increased postoperative anterior laxity compared with interference screw fixation. Adjustable CSF devices were introduced to avoid these problems but have been associated with graft lengthening and inconsistent outcomes.

Purpose:

To (1) report the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior laxity at 150 N, clinical scores, and failure rates 2 years after ACL reconstruction with 4-strand semitendinosus autografts using an adjustable CSF device and (2) determine the preoperative factors associated with clinical outcomes.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 131 patients who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction, performed with 4-strand semitendinosus grafts that were secured using Pullup adjustable-length CSF devices with femoral and tibial fixation techniques, were prospectively enrolled in this study; 34 patients were excluded because of contralateral instability or ipsilateral knee injuries that required additional surgery. This left a cohort of 97 patients who were evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months. The evaluation consisted of measuring the SSD in anterior laxity and patient-reported outcome scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] and Lysholm scores). Regression analyses were performed to determine associations between these outcomes and 9 preoperative variables.

Results:

Only 2 patients could not be reached, 2 could not be evaluated because of contralateral ACL tears, and 2 had graft failure. At 2-year follow-up, the remaining 91 patients had a mean SSD in anterior laxity of 0.8 ± 1.8 mm (range, –4.2 to 5.3 mm), mean IKDC score of 87.6 ± 10.6 (range, 43.7-100.0), and mean Lysholm score of 90.8 ± 9.3 (range, 56.0-100.0). At final follow-up, compared with knees with partial ruptures, those with complete ruptures had equivalent laxity (P = .266) and Lysholm scores (P = .352) but lower IKDC scores (P = .009). Multivariable regression revealed that the IKDC score decreased with increased preoperative laxity (β = –1.35 [95% CI, –2.48 to –0.23]; P = .019).

Conclusion:

The novel adjustable-length CSF device produced satisfactory anterior laxity and clinical outcomes, with a failure rate of 2.1%, which compare favorably with those reported for nonadjustable CSF devices.

[Anatomical study of anterior cruciate ligament and its effect on reconstruction technique]

Objective

To summarize the current research progress of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) anatomy, and discuss its effect on the reconstruction technique.

Methods

The literature concerning ACL anatomy and reconstruction at home and abroad was extensively reviewed and summarized.

Results

The anatomy and morphology of ACL has gained new recognition in recent years, and the "Ribbon-like" ACL has gradually been paid attention to by researchers. In present researches, it seems the "Ribbon-like" anatomy theory has advantages in theory when compared with the previous anatomy theory. It is more in line with the anatomy and isometric reconstruction.

Conclusion

The understanding of ACL anatomy guided the development of ACL reconstruction. The "Ribbon-like" ACL anatomy theory is the different understanding of the anatomy theory, which remains controversy. The "Ribbon-like" reconstruction maybe has more advantages in theory, but further study is needed.

Suspensory Versus Aperture Fixation of a Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hamstring grafts have become a popular choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; however, the most effective means of fixation of these soft tissue grafts is unknown.

PURPOSE

To determine whether suspensory or aperture fixation of hamstring tendon autografts provides better stability and clinical outcomes in ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search of studies reporting single-bundle ACL reconstructions using 4-stranded hamstring tendon autografts with aperture or suspensory fixation with a minimum 24-month follow-up was conducted. Stability and clinical outcomes were compared for aperture versus suspensory fixation. Knee stability was measured with the Lachman or pivot-shift test or KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (SSD), and outcomes were determined with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, and Lysholm scores as well as graft failures. A random-effects model with a pooled estimate for the between-study variance was used to estimate proportions or means for each outcome and its corresponding 95% CI.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included, of which 20 utilized suspensory fixation techniques and 21 utilized aperture fixation techniques. A >3-mm SSD was seen more often in the aperture group than the suspensory group, which was statistically significant ( P < .0001), but there was no significant difference between groups for a >5-mm SSD ( P = .53). The aperture group demonstrated significantly more graft ruptures than did the suspensory group ( P = .03). There were no statistically significant differences in Lachman grade 0 ( P = .76), grade 1 ( P = .89), and grade 2 ( P = .55) or pivot-shift grade 0 ( P = .72), grade 1 ( P = .97), and grade 2 ( P = .28). There was no statistically significant difference in mean continuous IKDC ( P = .80), Tegner ( P = .34), or Lysholm ( P = .84) scores.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated improved overall arthrometric stability and fewer graft ruptures using suspensory fixation compared with aperture fixation of a quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction. There were no differences in IKDC, Lysholm, Lachman, and pivot-shift outcomes between suspensory and aperture fixation.

Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee

Purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the latest research on the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and present the consensus of the ALL Expert Group on the anatomy, radiographic landmarks, biomechanics, clinical and radiographic diagnosis, lesion classification, surgical technique and clinical outcomes. A consensus on controversial subjects surrounding the ALL and anterolateral knee instability has been established based on the opinion of experts, the latest publications on the subject and an exchange of experiences during the ALL Experts Meeting (November 2015, Lyon, France). The ALL is found deep to the iliotibial band. The femoral origin is just posterior and proximal to the lateral epicondyle; the tibial attachment is 21.6 mm posterior to Gerdy's tubercle and 4-10 mm below the tibial joint line. On a lateral radiographic view the femoral origin is located in the postero-inferior quadrant and the tibial attachment is close to the centre of the proximal tibial plateau. Favourable isometry of an ALL reconstruction is seen when the femoral position is proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle, with the ALL being tight upon extension and lax upon flexion. The ALL can be visualised on ultrasound, or on T2-weighted coronal MRI scans with proton density fat-suppressed evaluation. The ALL injury is associated with a Segond fracture, and often occurs in conjunction with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Recognition and repair of the ALL lesions should be considered to improve the control of rotational stability provided by ACL reconstruction. For high-risk patients, a combined ACL and ALL reconstruction improves rotational control and reduces the rate of re-rupture, without increased postoperative complication rates compared to ACL-only reconstruction. In conclusion this paper provides a contemporary consensus on all studied features of the ALL. The findings warrant future research in order to further test these early observations, with the ultimate goal of improving the long-term outcomes of ACL-injured patients. Level of evidence Level V-Expert opinion.

The evolution of primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction and recovery of early post-operative range of motion

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse early post-operative range of motion (ROM) as our anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate (ACL) reconstruction technique with respect to tunnel placement evolved. It is the hypothesis of this study that more anatomic placement of the femoral insertion site of the anteromedial (AM) bundle of the ACL results in better restoration of early post-operative knee range of motion.

METHODS

Two methods of DB ACL reconstruction regarding more accurate placement of the femoral AM tunnel in relation to its anatomic origin were compared. Patients presenting for 1- and 3-month post-operative clinical visits were examined for passive extension and active flexion by members of the clinical staff. Only patients undergoing primary DB reconstruction with allograft were included in the analyses. To determine the effects of the modified AM bundle placement on recovery of post-operative ROM, patients undergoing surgery in the 6 months before July 2006 (Group A, n = 50) were compared to patients undergoing surgery in the 6 months after July 2006 (Group B, n = 49).

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients met the inclusion criteria. More accurate placement of the AM bundle of the ACL was associated with a smaller side-to-side difference in flexion at 1 month (n.s.) and at 3 months (3° reduction, p < 0.03) after surgery. There was no effect on extension (n.s.) CONCLUSION: More anatomic placement of the femoral insertion of the AM bundle was associated with improved knee flexion. The study translates the findings of previous anatomic basic science research to demonstrate improved restoration of normal joint motion. This ideally leads to improved long-term clinical outcomes and maintenance of joint and cartilage health.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to apply the anatomic ACL reconstruction scoring checklist (AARSC) and to evaluate the degree to which clinical studies comparing single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions are anatomic.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search was performed using the databases PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 1995 to January 2014 comparing SB and DB ACL reconstructions with clinical outcome measurements were included. The items from the AARSC were recorded for both the SB and DB groups in each study.

RESULTS

Eight-thousand nine-hundred and ninety-four studies were analysed, 77 were included. Randomized clinical trials (29; 38%) and prospective comparative studies (29; 38%) were the most frequent study type. Most studies were published in 2011 (19; 25%). The most commonly reported items for both SB and DB groups were as follows: graft type (152; 99%), femoral and tibial fixation method (149; 97% respectively), knee flexion angle during graft tensioning (124; 8%) and placement of the tibial tunnel at the ACL insertion site (101; 66%). The highest level of documentation used for ACL tunnel position for both groups was often one dimensional, e.g. drawing, operative notes or o'clock reference. The DB reconstruction was in general more thoroughly reported. The means for the AARSC were 6.9 ± 2.8 for the SB group and 8.3 ± 2.8 for the DB group. Both means were below a proposed required minimum score of 10 for anatomic ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

There was substantial underreporting of surgical data for both the SB and DB groups in clinical studies. This underreporting creates difficulties when analysing, comparing and pooling results of scientific studies on this subject.

Single- vs. double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a new aspect of knee assessment during activities involving dynamic knee rotation

Few studies have compared single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the knee joint during activities involving change-of-direction maneuvers and knee rotation. This study examined whether the type of ACLR contributes to postphysiotherapy outcomes, with an emphasis on knee function assessment during activities involving dynamic knee rotation. Fifteen male patients after SB ACLR and 15 male patients after DB ACLR took part in the same physiotherapy program. Twenty-four weeks after ACLR, both groups underwent anterior laxity measurement, pivot shift tests, range of movement and joint circumference measurements, subjective assessment of pain and stability levels in the knee joint, peak torque measurement of the muscles rotating the tibia toward the femur, and a run test with maximal speed and change-of-direction maneuvers. Comparative analysis did not show any differences between the results of anterior tibial translation, pivot shift test, range of movement and joint circumference, and subjective assessment of pain and knee joint stability levels. No differences were noted between the groups in peak torque values obtained from the muscles responsible for internal and external tibial rotation or results of the run test. The data obtained from this study can be used by research teams to monitor and compare the effectiveness of various study protocols involving surgical and physiotherapy treatment. The data are especially useful when combined with the clinical assessment of patients who would like to return to sport.

Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years

BACKGROUND

Double bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been proposed to recreate the natural anatomy of ACL. Reconstruction of the anatomy of both the bundles of ACL has been thought to be able to restore the rotational stability of the knee joint. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether DB reconstruction has better functional outcome than single bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and manual laxity tests of knee in patients treated with DB ACL reconstruction in Indian population.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 25 patients with an isolated ACL injury operated for DB ACL reconstruction after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and in the post-operative period at regular intervals with the minimum follow up of 4 years. Clinical stability was assessed by anterior drawer test, Lachman test and pivot shift test. Functional outcome was assessed by IKDC, Lysholm and Modified Cincinnati scores.

RESULTS

At the end of 4 years, functional outcome in terms of all subjective scores was satisfactory. Graded stability results of the Lachman, Anterior drawer and pivot shift tests were almost near to that in normal knee. No complication occurred post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical DB ACL reconstruction seems to offer satisfactory results in terms of subjective scores and stability tests to patients with ACL tear. It has been found to be associated with no obvious complications and no failures. However a larger patient pool is desired for conclusive results.

Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses

PURPOSE

Multiple meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, the highest available level of evidence, have been conducted to determine whether double-bundle (DB) or single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) provides superior clinical outcomes and knee stability; however, results are discordant. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of meta-analyses comparing SB and DB ACL-R to discern the cause of the discordance and to determine which of these meta-analyses provides the current best available evidence.

METHODS

We evaluated available scientific support for SB as compared with DB ACL-R by systematically reviewing the literature for published meta-analyses. Data on patient clinical outcomes and knee stability (as measured by KT arthrometry and pivot-shift testing) were extracted. Meta-analysis quality was judged using the Oxman-Guyatt and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses systems. The Jadad algorithm was then applied to determine which meta-analyses provided the highest level of evidence.

RESULTS

Nine meta-analyses were included, of which 3 included Level I Evidence and 6 included both Level I and Level II Evidence. Most studies found significant differences favoring DB reconstruction on pivot-shift testing, KT arthrometry measurement of anterior tibial translation, and International Knee Documentation Committee objective grading. Most studies detected no significant differences between the 2 techniques in subjective outcome scores (Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective), graft failure, or complications. Oxman-Guyatt and Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses scores varied, with 2 studies exhibiting major flaws (Oxman-Guyatt score <3). After application of the Jadad decision algorithm, 3 concordant high-quality meta-analyses were selected, with each concluding that DB ACL-R provided significantly better knee stability (by KT arthrometry and pivot-shift testing) than SB ACL-R but no advantages in clinical outcomes or risk of graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The current best available evidence suggests that DB ACL-R provides better postoperative knee stability than SB ACL-R, whereas clinical outcomes and risk of graft failure are similar between techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Twenty-Year Experience of a Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a four-strand semitendinosus tendon was started in our department in July 1994. The motivation for starting the procedure was that the EndoButton with an inside-out procedure instrument became available in Japan. A review article of our DB ACL reconstruction procedure was summarized for the twentieth anniversary of the surgical procedure. Initial tension setting of the two grafts was changed in the first 8 years to achieve better stability during DB ACL reconstruction. A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was started in July 2002 to clarify superiority of the DB procedure to single-bundle (SB) reconstruction under the concept of anatomic reconstruction. Several anatomic studies were performed to describe normal ACL anatomy, which is essential for realizing anatomic reconstruction. A remnant-preserving technique would be an additional option for our DB procedure to improve reconstruction outcomes. Thus, a new remnant-preserving DB procedure was started in 2012. The reproducibility of the new procedure was investigated using three-dimensional computed tomography images. More complex procedures were performed using a transtibial technique and EndoButtons. Initial tension balancing between the two grafts was important for a better outcome. Superiority of knee stability after the DB compared to that after the SB procedure was clarified by the RCT. However, no patient consensus has been reached on any subjective advantage to the DB procedure. Studies of normal ACL anatomy have left questions unresolved regarding where the two tunnels should be created for direct and indirect insertions based on normal anatomy. A new remnant-preserving DB ACL procedure has been practiced. The procedure was more reproducible with respect to creating the femoral tunnel. DB ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon is an attractive option when pursuing a better outcome for patients.

Excursion of bone-patella tendon-bone grafts during the flexion-extension movement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between isometric and anatomic reconstruction techniques

Background/objective

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the biomechanical differences between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts reconstructed by isometric and anatomic reconstruction techniques, based on their length changes.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-three knees with primary ACL reconstruction using the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft were retrospectively identified. Twenty-two knees and 111 knees underwent isometric round tunnel (IRT) ACL reconstruction and anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) ACL reconstruction, respectively.

Results

After femoral-side fixation of the graft in the surgery, the length change of the graft from 120° flexion to full extension was measured by using an isometric positioner at the tibial side. Both reconstructive techniques showed little length change from 120° to ∼20° of flexion, followed by elongation of the graft, until full extension. The amount of length change of the grafts was 1.0 ± 0.7 mm with the IRT technique, and 3.4 ± 0.9 mm with the ART technique. These findings were significantly different, based on the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The native ACL has an intrinsic length change of 3–6 mm, and therefore the ART technique may more closely replicate the biomechanical function of the native ACL.

Kinematics of Rotation in Joints of the Lower Limbs and Pelvis during Gait: Early Results-SB ACLR Approach versus DB ACLR Approach

It is difficult to find publications comparing rotation kinematics in large joints of the lower limbs and pelvis during gait in patients after single-bundle (SB) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR) with double-bundle (DB) ACLR of the knee. The aim of this study was to compare rotation kinematics in ankle, knee, and hip joints and the pelvis during gait in the 14th week after SB and DB ACLR. The subjects were males after SB (n = 10) and DB (n = 13) ACLR and a control group (n = 15). The values of kinematic parameters were recorded during internal (IR) and external (ER) rotation in the joints during gait using the BTS SMART. The SB ACLR group obtained significantly higher values of ER in the involved knee comparing to DB ACLR and controls and excessive IR in the hip comparing to controls. In the DB ACLR group, excessive ER was noted in the involved leg's foot. Comparing with the DB ACLR and control groups, SB ACLR subjects had more substantial disorders of rotation kinematics in the lower limb joints. However, in both ACLR groups, 14 weeks of postoperative physiotherapy were not enough to fully restore rotation kinematics in joints of the lower limbs during gait.

Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review

PURPOSE

To describe current evidence on single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in terms of differences in knee kinematics, functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and graft failures.

METHODS

An electronic search was made using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 1995 to August 2011 were included, and an updated search was made in PubMed in July 2012. Therapeutic studies, level of evidence I-III, for isolated primary ACL tears written in English comparing single- and double-bundle reconstruction reporting clinical outcome were included. Quality appraisal based on Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was performed.

RESULTS

Of 7,154 potentially eligible studies, 60 papers were included (25 randomised controlled trials, 21 prospective comparative studies, 14 retrospective comparative studies), comprising 4,146 patients (2,072 single-bundle, 2,074 double-bundle). Minor differences were found between study types. An analysis of graft failures revealed fewer re-ruptures in double-bundle reconstruction than single-bundle, 19 and 44, respectively. Up to 45 % of the studies reported a superior outcome in double-bundle reconstruction in terms of antero-posterior laxity, measured with the Lachman, anterior drawer, KT-1000/2000 and navigation. Measurements of rotatory laxity revealed superior results in double-bundle reconstruction measured with pivot shift and navigation in 18/42 (8/15 anatomically reconstructed) and 9/20 studies, respectively. Patient-reported outcome measures and functional outcomes did not differ to a large extent; however, differences when identified were almost exclusively in favour of double-bundle reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence, double-bundle reconstruction appears to have fewer re-ruptures and less antero-posterior and rotatory laxity. Furthermore, no differences were found in short-term patient-reported outcome measures or objective findings. However, detailed statistical analyses of the included studies divided into homogeneous groups are needed to avoid reporting bias and to confirm any statistical difference.

Comparison of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and single-bundle reconstruction with remnant pull-out suture

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by tensioning of the ACL remnant using pull-out sutures compared with ACL double-bundle reconstruction.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were included in single-bundle reconstruction with remnant tensioning group (Group 1), and 56 patients were included in the double-bundle reconstruction group (Group 2). The remnant tissue was tensioned to the direction of posterolateral bundle, which unrelated to the type of remnant bundle. Objective knee stability was evaluated by anterior stress radiography, KT-1000 and lateral pivot shift tests. The Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee and OrthopädischeArbeitsgruppeKnie scoring systems were used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in mechanical stability and clinical results (n.s). However, surgical time of remnant tensioning group is shorter than double-bundle reconstruction group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Remnant tensioning suture with single-bundle reconstruction could be used with positive results as good as double-bundle technique if a good ACL remnant was found bridging the femur and tibia, rather than debride or damage to the remnant tissue during operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective, comparative cohort study, Level IV.

Extra-articular ACL Reconstruction and Pivot Shift: In Vivo Dynamic Evaluation With Navigation

BACKGROUND

The pivot-shift test is considered a reliable examination to evaluate the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, as it strongly correlates with patient satisfaction, giving-way episodes, and activity level. The addition of lateral tenodesis (LT) to current techniques of intra-articular reconstruction with a hamstring graft could potentially improve knee laxity in cases of severe rotational instability.

PURPOSE

To biomechanically investigate the effect of intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstructions on knee laxity and the pivot-shift phenomenon.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with the addition of extra-articular reconstruction. In patients in group A, intra-articular reconstruction was performed first and LT thereafter; in patients in group B, LT was performed first and intra-articular reconstruction thereafter. A navigator equipped with software designed for both static and dynamic evaluations was used to measure maximum anterior tibial translation (ATT) and axial tibial rotation (ATR) at 30° of flexion (static evaluation) and during the pivot-shift test (dynamic evaluation). Measurements were performed before reconstruction, after the first procedure, and after the second procedure.

RESULTS

For the static evaluation, in group A, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 14.1 ± 3.7 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 6.0 ± 1.9 mm after ACL reconstruction and to 5.3 ± 1.6 mm after LT. The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion significantly decreased from 35.7° ± 4.8° to 28.9° ± 4.1° and to 20.9° ± 4.8°, respectively. In group B, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 13.5 ± 6.5 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 10.2 ± 3.2 mm after LT and to 4.0 ± 1.6 mm after ACL reconstruction. The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion significantly decreased from 36.7° ± 4.8° to 26.2° ± 6.2° and to 23.5° ± 4.9°, respectively. For the dynamic evaluation (pivot-shift test), in group A, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 15.0 ± 6.8 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 9.4 ± 6.4 mm after ACL reconstruction and to 8.5 ± 5.4 mm after LT. The mean ATR significantly decreased from 16.9° ± 4.7° to 11.6° ± 4.1° and to 6.1° ± 2.2°, respectively. In group B, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 12.5 ± 3.3 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 9.1 ± 5.9 mm after LT and to 8.1 ± 5.4 mm after ACL reconstruction. The mean ATR significantly decreased from 16.0° ± 4.5° to 9.2° ± 4.3° and to 7.5° ± 4.0°, respectively.

CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Extra-articular reconstruction had little effect in reducing the anterior displacement of the tibia at 30° of flexion, but it was more effective than intra-articular reconstruction in reducing ATR. Anatomic ACL reconstruction and LT were synergic in controlling the pivot-shift phenomenon.

Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction more effectively restored antero-posterior (A-P) laxity, rotatory laxity and reduced frequency of graft rupture. Our hypothesis was that anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction results in superior rotational knee laxity and fewer graft ruptures due to its double-bundle tension pattern, compared with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. All therapeutic trials written in English reporting knee kinematic outcomes and graft rupture rates of primary anatomic double- versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included. Only clinical studies of levels I-II evidence were included. Data regarding kinematic tests were extracted and included pivot-shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, KT-1000 measurements, A-P laxity measures using navigation and total internal-external (IRER) laxity measured using navigation, as well as graft failure frequency.

RESULTS

A total of 7,154 studies were identified of which 15 papers (8 randomized controlled trials and 7 prospective cohort studies, n = 970 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Anatomic ACL double-bundle reconstruction demonstrated less anterior laxity using KT-1000 arthrometer with a standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.36 (95% CI 0.214-0.513, p < 0.001) and less A-P laxity measured with navigation (SMD = 0.29 95% CI 0.01-0.565, p = 0.042). Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction did not lead to significant improvements in pivot-shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, total IRER or graft failure rates compared to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction is superior to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in terms of restoration of knee kinematics, primarily A-P laxity. Whether these improvements of laxity result in long-term improvement of clinical meaningful outcomes remains uncertain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Biomechanics of single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fixation with a unique expandable interference screw

BACKGROUND

Single-tunnel double-bundle (STDB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can restore biomechanical function and anatomic structure, but existing methods of graft fixation are not adequate. The aims of this study are to examine knee biomechanics after STDB reconstruction using a unique expandable interference screw for fixation.

METHODS

The biomechanical parameters of six pairs of human cadaveric knee specimens were measured with the ACL intact, after ACL removal, and after STDB reconstruction using the interference screw or single-tunnel single-bundle (STSB) reconstruction. Anterior tibial translation under 134 N anterior tibial load in a neutral position as well as in 15° and 30° internal and external knee rotation and the internal tibial rotation angle under the rotatory load (5 N·m internal tibial rotation) were measured.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translations at each degree of knee flexion in the STDB group were significantly less than in the STSB group (all, P<0.05). The internal rotation angles in the STSB group at five flexion angles were significantly higher than in the ACL intact group, whereas there were significantly less than those of the ACL absent group (P<0.05). Under rotatory loads in the neutral position, the tibial internal rotation angles of the STDB group were significantly lower than in the STSB group at all flexion angles (all, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

STDB ACL reconstruction with the expandable interference screw provides better anteroposterior and rotational stability than STSB reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The technique provides the advantages of double-bundle reconstruction using a single-tunnel technique.

Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction techniques result in graft obliquities that closely mimic the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy

BACKGROUND

It has been reported previously that single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with more accurate restoration of the footprint of the native ACL fails to restore the graft obliquity of the native ACL in the coronal plane. Whether double-bundle ACL reconstruction restores the graft obliquity of each bundle of the native ACL has not yet been determined.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques can restore the graft obliquities of both anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles in the native ACL in both sagittal and coronal planes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Patients were randomized to 2 groups to undergo either TP or OI tibial tunnel-independent anatomic ACL reconstruction. All participants underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of both knees, and the native ACL obliquity was determined using the participant's contralateral knee. Graft obliquities were determined by measuring the angles between the center line of the graft and the surface line of the tibial plateau, and the obliquities of paired knees were compared. Graft obliquities were analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

In the sagittal plane, the mean AM graft obliquity was 54.2° on the operated side and 54.6° on the nonoperated side, and the difference between sides was not statistically significant (P = .352). The mean PL graft obliquity in the sagittal plane was 54.1° on the operated side and 53.0° on the nonoperated side, and the difference between sides was also not statistically significant (P = .228). In the coronal plane, the mean AM graft obliquity was 73.8° on the operated side and 73.4° on the nonoperated side, and the mean PL graft obliquity was 65.5° on the operated side and 66.4° on the nonoperated side. There were no statistically significant differences between sides (P = .418 for AM graft; P = .328 for PL graft). Differences in the paired graft obliquities in each group were also statistically insignificant between the TP and OI groups.

CONCLUSION

Both TP and OI anatomic double-bundle reconstruction techniques can result in graft obliquities in both bundles that resemble the native ACL in both sagittal and coronal planes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques might more closely restore the normal kinematics of the native ACL by restoring the normal obliquity of both ACL bundles.

Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare femoral and tibial tunnel placement, angle, and length between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Fifty patients were randomized to the 2 groups, and a femoral tunnel was created through the tibial tunnel (transtibial) and the far anteromedial portal (AMP) in 25 patients each. Both groups underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons. Volume-rendering computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate femoral and tibial tunnel placement, and transparent 3-dimensional CT image reconstruction, to evaluate tunnel angles, on the seventh postoperative day. Femoral tunnel length was measured intraoperatively.

RESULTS

Anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) femoral tunnels were placed significantly lower and deeper with the AMP technique (shallow/deep direction: 21% and 30%, high/low direction: 18% and 48%) than with the transtibial technique (25% and 34%, 12% and 43%). Except for the tibial tunnel angle in the axial plane, AMB and PLB femoral and tibial tunnel angles differed significantly in 3 dimensions. AMB and PLB femoral tunnel lengths were significantly shorter with the AMP technique (AMB: 33 mm, PLB: 32 mm) than with the transtibial technique (AMB: 49 mm, PLB: 37 mm) (P < .001 and P = .001). Both femoral tunnel lengths in the AMP group correlated significantly with the tunnel angle in the sagittal (AMB: r = 0.69, PLB: r = 0.51) and axial (AMB: r = 0.58, PLB: r = 0.75) planes.

CONCLUSIONS

AMB and PLB femoral tunnels were placed significantly deeper, lower, and closer to the femoral footprint reported in previous cadaveric studies in the anteromedial portal technique than in the transtibial technique. Femoral tunnel length was significantly shorter in the anteromedial portal group than in the transtibial group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of autograft versus allograft tissue

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are mixed, with some reports of excellent to good outcomes and other reports of early graft failure or significant donor site morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in functional outcomes, failure rates, and stability between autograft and allograft ACL reconstructions.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Evidence Based Medicine Reviews Collection), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus were searched for articles on ACL reconstruction. Abstracts from annual meetings of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America were searched for relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION

INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES WERE AS FOLLOWS: primary unilateral ACL injuries, mean patient age less than 41 years, and follow-up for at least 24 months postreconstruction. Exclusion criteria for studies included the following: skeletally immature patients, multiligament injuries, and publication dates before 1990.

DATA EXTRACTION

Joint stability measures included Lachman test, pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer assessment, and frequency of graft failures. Functional outcome measures included Tegner activity scores, Cincinnati knee scores, Lysholm scores, and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) total scores.

RESULTS

More than 5000 studies were identified. After full text review of 576 studies, 56 were included, of which only 1 directly compared autograft and allograft reconstruction. Allograft ACL reconstructions were more lax when assessed by the KT-1000 arthrometer. For all other outcome measures, there was no statistically significant difference between autograft and allograft ACL reconstruction. For all outcome measures, there was strong evidence of statistical heterogeneity between studies. The sample size necessary for a randomized clinical trial to detect a difference between autograft and allograft reconstruction varied, depending on the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

With the current literature, only KT-1000 arthrometer assessment demonstrated more laxity with allograft reconstruction. A randomized clinical trial directly comparing allograft to autograft ACL reconstruction is warranted, but a multicenter study would be required to obtain an adequate sample size.

Effects of single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction on tibiofemoral compressive stresses and joint kinematics during simulated squatting

The purpose of this study was to compare tibiofemoral (TF) kinematics and TF compressive stresses between single bundle- (SB-) and double bundle-ACL reconstruction (DB-ACLR) during simulated squatting. Twelve matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaver knees were utilized. A simulated squat through 100° of knee flexion was performed in the ACL-intact joint. The ACL was transected and SB- and DB-ACLR procedures were performed in one knee of each pair. The squat was repeated. Knee kinematics were measured using a motion tracking system and the TF compressive forces were measured using thin film pressure sensors. The posterior shifts of the tibia for SB- and DB-ACLR knees were significantly greater than the ACL-intact condition for knee flexion angles 0° to 40° (p<.05). However, there was no difference between the SB- and DB-ACLR knees at any flexion angle (0° to 100°; p=.37). SB- and DB-ACLR knees had greater IE rotation than intact knees from 90° through 50° of flexion (p<.05), but not between 40° and full extension. There was no difference between SB- and DB-ACLR knees (p=.68). The TF compressive stresses of the DB-ACLR were significantly lower than intact for all angles except 10° (p=.06), whereas SB-ACLR knees did not differ from intact at flexion angles between 30° and 50° (p>.32). There were no significant differences between the two reconstruction conditions (p=.74). This study showed that there was no difference in the TF kinematics or compressive stresses between SB- and DB-ACLR, and only minor differences when compared to the intact state.

Biomechanical comparison between single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon under cyclic loading condition

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the anterior tibial translation (ATT) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed-knee between single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction under cyclic loading.

METHODS

Single-bundle and double-bundle reconstructions of the knee were performed sequentially in randomized order on the same side using eight human amputated knees. After each reconstruction, the reconstructed-knee was subjected to 500-cycles of 0 to 100-N anterior tibial loads using a material testing machine. The ATT before and after cyclic loading and "laxity increase", which indicated a permanent elongation of the graft construct, was also determined.

RESULTS

The ATT after cyclic loading increased in both single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction techniques compared to that without cyclic loading. Changes in ATT before and after cyclic loading were 3.9 ± 0.9 mm and 2.9 ± 0.6 mm respectively, and were significantly different. Laxity increase was also significantly different (4.3 ± 0.9 mm and 3.2 ± 0.8 mm respectively). Although no graft rupture or graft fixation failure was found during cyclic loading, the graft deviated into an eccentric position within the tunnel.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ATT was significantly increased in both single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction with hamstring tendon after cyclic loading test, there was significant difference. Double-bundle reconstruction might be superior to prevent increasing ATT under cyclic loading. Deformation of hamstring tendon after cyclic loading might result in deterioration of knee stability after ACL reconstruction, and is one of disadvantages of soft tissue graft.

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with reverse "Y"-plasty grafts and fixation in the femur with either a bioabsorbable interference screw or an Endobutton

We propose a new reverse "Y"-plasty graft for use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction that involves double tibial tunnels and a single femoral tunnel. With this technique, the hamstrings were used as autografts and fixed separately with bioabsorbable interference screws (group A) or Endobuttons (group B) in femurs. A prospective series of 63 patients underwent primary reconstruction of the ACL; all procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Group A included 35 patients (22 male, 13 female), with a mean age of 25.5 (17-40) years, who were followed up for 28.5 (12-48) months. Group B included 28 patients (17 male, 11 female), with a mean age of 24.3 (18-38) years, who were followed up for 29.5 (12-46) months. Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Larson scoring were used to compare the therapeutic effects experienced at the knee. Lysholm scores were 93.26±2.67 (group A) and 93.81±2.42 (group B); Larson scores were 91.91±2.29 (group A) and 92.81±2.39 (group B); IKDC scores were 93.89±1.88 (group A) and 94.15±1.77 (group B). None of the scoring differences between groups were statistically significant (T(1)=0.849, P(1)=0.399, T(2)=1.506, P(2)=0.137, T(3)=0.560, P(3)=0.578). The Lachman test was negative in 46 patients (90.2%) and 51 knees, including 25 (89.3%) of the 28 knees in group A and 21 (91.3%) of the 23 knees in group B. Negative Pivot shift was present postoperatively in 49 knees of 51 patients (96.1%), including 27 (96.4%) of the 28 knees in group A and 22 (95.7%) of the 23 knees in group B. All of the patients in both groups achieved full extension and at least 135° of knee flexion. This novel technique involves the creation of double tibial tunnels and a single femoral tunnel. In the tibia, there was a bone bridge, ranging from 2 to 3mm, between the two bundles, which are tensioned at different degrees of flexion to maintain the stability of the knee. In the femur, the grafts were fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws or Endobuttons. The outcomes show that normal function and joint stability were achieved in both groups, as compared with preoperative measurements. Although the outcomes in group A (grafts fixed with the bioabsorbable interference screws in the femur) was better than those observed in group B (grafts fixed with Endobuttons), there was no statistical difference between the groups.

ANATOMICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT OF THE KNEE: DOUBLE BAND OR SINGLE BAND?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the double-band and single-band techniques for anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee and demonstrate that the double-band technique not only provides greater anterior stability but also causes less pain and a better subjective patient response.

METHODS

We selected 42 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, by means of either the single-band anatomical reconstruction technique, using flexor tendon grafts with two tunnels, or the double-band anatomical reconstruction technique, using four tunnels and grafts from the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. All fixations were performed using interference screws. There was no variation in the sample. Before the operation, the objective and subjective IKDC scores, Lysholm score and length of time with the injury were evaluated. All these variables were reassessed six months later, and the KT-1000 correlation with the contralateral knee was also evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in subjective evaluations, but the single-band group showed better results in relation to range of motion and objective evaluations including KT-1000 (with statistical significance).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that there was no difference between the two groups in subjective evaluations, but better results were found using the single-band anatomical technique, in relation to objective evaluations.

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing the double-bundle technique

The goal of every orthopaedic surgeon should be to restore anatomy as close as possible to normal. Intense research on reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and an advancing knowledge of the anatomy and function of the 2 primary bundles of the ACL have led to techniques of ACL reconstruction that more closely restore normal anatomy. Restoring the ACL footprint is one of the most important goals of the surgery, and the choice between anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction is determined by the anatomical features of each patient. After reconstruction, the graft undergoes a complex, lengthy process of remodeling; therefore, inappropriate (early), aggressive rehabilitation can lead to graft failure and compromise the patient's outcome. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the anatomy and function of the ACL, the methods for anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction, and our recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation.

Single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis--does anatomy matter?

PURPOSE

To determine whether double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to better restoration of anterior and rotational laxity and range of motion than single-bundle reconstruction.

METHODS

A search was performed in the Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases. All randomized, quasi-randomized, and observational clinical trials that reported the outcome of double- versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included in our meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were anterior laxity (KT arthrometer; MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), pivot shift, and range of motion. Subgroup analyses were performed for more than 2 years' follow-up, anatomic reconstruction, and nonanatomic reconstruction. The quality of the included studies was scored by use of the GRADE Checklist.

RESULTS

Included 12 studies in this meta-analysis, 5 of which were randomized. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of double-bundle reconstruction for anterior laxity (KT arthrometer difference, -0.6 mm), Lachman test (64% risk reduction of positive Lachman), and pivot-shift test (69% risk reduction of positive shift). Similar results were found for the subgroup with more than 2 years' follow-up and anatomic reconstructions. There were no significant differences for the subgroup with nonanatomic reconstructions, except a 2.6 times risk increase of extension deficit with nonanatomic double-bundle reconstruction compared with nonanatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Most of the included studies were found to have at least one serious limitation in study design.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with single-bundle reconstruction, double-bundle reconstruction showed less anterior laxity, as measured by the KT arthrometer and Lachman test, and better rotational laxity, as measured by the pivot-shift test. The majority of the included studies had at least one major limitation in study design that decreased the quality of the study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis.

A matched pairs comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, clinical results and manual laxity testing

PURPOSE

To compare the subjective clinical results as well as manual anterior and rotational stability in patients treated with either single- (SB) or double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients who had undergone SB or DB hamstring ACL reconstruction with hamstrings were included in a retrospective matched pair analysis. At follow-up IKDC subjective, CKS, KOOS, CKS and a visual analogue satisfaction scale was assessed. A blinded surgeon examined the joint laxity and completed the objective IKDC. The KT-1000 was used to bilaterally test anterior tibial translation. Patients with confounding variables, which statistically influenced the clinical outcome (passive flexion and extension deficits, persistent quadriceps deficit, tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and non-repairable medial meniscus injury), were identified and excluded from the statistical analysis (n = 10).

RESULTS

For all subjective scores, DB patients reported increased scores compared with SB patients. While consistently higher scores were demonstrated, statistical significance was only achieved for the IKDC subjective (P = 0.04) and VAS satisfaction (P = 0.02). Graded stability results of the Lachman, anterior drawer and pivot-shift tests were significantly higher in the DB group and KT-1000 side-to-side difference was significantly better for DB (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

DB ACL reconstruction appeared to more consistently result in significantly higher subjective outcome scores and manual tests of joint stability than SB ACL reconstruction. Besides the surgical technique, normal extension and quadriceps strength after surgery were identified to be an essential component in order to provide the patient with a successful outcome.

Structural properties of a new fixation strategy in double bundle ACL reconstruction: the MiniShim

INTRODUCTION

Double-bundle reconstruction of the ACL has become the focus of scientific and clinical interest in the last years. However, there is still a discussion about the most appropriate technique for graft fixation. Both, extracortical fixation systems like the Endobutton and aperture fixation by interference screws have advantages as well as disadvantages. Aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical properties of a new small wedge shaped implant (MiniShim, Karl Storz, Germany) for the fixation of a soft tissue graft in double bundle ACL reconstruction and to compare it to an aperture fixation by interference screw and an extracortical fixation.

METHODS

Porcine knees and flexor tendons were used for this study. 5 and 6 mm tunnels were drilled. The following fixation strategies were tested: 4 and 5 mm MiniShim (Karl Storz Germany), 6 mm interference screw (MegaFix, Karl Storz, Germany), hybridfixation by FlippTack (FlippTack, Karl Storz, Germany) and MiniShim and hybridfixation by FlippTack and 6 mm interference screw. All fixation strategies were tested with a 5 and 6 mm tendon graft. Maximum load, yield load and stiffness were recorded using a material testing machine. Load was applied in line with the bone tunnel. Grafts were cyclically preconditioned between 0 and 20 N for 10 cycles before the graft-bone-complex was loaded to failure. Statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS Version 11.0.

RESULTS

Load to failure for the 5 mm graft was 81.1 and 118.0 N for the 4 and 5 mm MiniShims. Fixation by interference screw reached 237.4 N. The extracortical fixation resulted in a load to failure of 471.7 N. Load to failure for the 6 mm tendon grafts was 52.0 and 92.8 N for the 4 and 5 mm MiniShims. Fixation by interference screw resulted in a load to failure of 214.0 N. Extracortical fixation failed at 451.7 N. The difference between MiniShim and interference screw was statistically significant. Load to failure was significantly higher for extracortical fixation compared to fixation by MiniShim or interference screw. Hybrid fixation showed higher fixation strength compared to fixation by interference screw or MiniShim alone. This difference was statistically significant. Stiffness was significantly higher for fixation by interference screw compared to extracortical fixation and fixation by MiniShim. Four different modes of failure could be seen. All 4 mm MiniShims failed by slippage of the tendon past the MiniShim. In the 5 mm group the fixation failed by pullout of the MiniShim or the tendon past the MiniShim. Hybrid fixation failed by rupture of the linkage material. When the graft was fixed by an interference screw failure occurred by rupture of the tendon at the fixation side.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid fixation using the MiniShim provides biomechanical properties strong enough to withstand the forces occurring during rehabilitation and comparable to the fixation strength provided by interference screw. While fixation by MiniShim alone does not provide sufficient fixation strength in double bundle ACL reconstruction, hybridfixation using a cortical fixation by FlippTack is an alternative to aperture fixation by interference screw concerning primary stability.

Relationship between thickness of the anteromedial bundle and thickness of the posterolateral bundle in the normal ACL

PURPOSE

Since the development of the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, many studies have focused on excursion and/or tension of each graft. However, no studies to date have adequately investigated thickness of the graft in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. To obtain basic knowledge from which an ideal graft thickness can be inferred, thicknesses of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) was measured in the normal ACL.

METHODS

The right knees of 50 cadavers donated for anatomy instruction were studied. Each ACL was separated into the AMB and PLB, and circumferences at the mid-substance and cross-sectional area at the femoral and tibial footprints were measured in each.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional areas of the AMB and PLB were 36 ± 10 and 32.1 ± 10.2 mm² at the femoral footprint, and 60.9 ± 21.8 and 52.2 ± 17.3 mm² at the tibial footprint, respectively. Circumferences at the mid-substance were 14.3 ± 3.3 mm for the ALB and 10.8 ± 3.1 mm for the PLB. A positive correlation was seen between AMB and PLB at each of the three sites.

CONCLUSION

The AMB is thicker than the PLB, showing a constant correlation in the normal ACL. This suggests that the anteromedial graft must be thicker than the posterolateral graft at least in actual operations.

The effect of graft fixation sequence on force distribution in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This paper investigated the effect of graft fixation sequence on knee joint biomechanics after a double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHOD

Two independently published biomechanical studies that investigated the biomechanics of double-bundle ACL reconstructions using similar robotic testing systems were compared. In each study, ten human cadaveric knees were tested under three different conditions: intact, ACL deficient, and ACL reconstructed using a double-bundle technique with the anteromedial (AM) graft fixed at 60° of flexion and the posterolateral (PL) graft fixed at full extension. In one study (Study A), the AM graft was fixed first; while in another study (Study B), the PL graft was fixed first. Knee kinematics, in situ forces of the ACL and the ACL grafts were measured under two loading conditions: an anterior tibial load of 134 N and a combined tibial torques (10 N·m valgus and 5 N·m internal tibial torques) in both studies.

RESULT

When AM graft was fixed first, the in situ force of the AM graft was lower than the native AM bundle at all flexion angles. The in situ force in the PL graft, however, was higher than the native PL bundle at all flexion angles. When the PL graft was fixed first, the in situ force of the AM graft was higher than the native AM bundle, while the in situ forces of the PL graft were lower than the native PL bundle at all flexion angles. Both studies demonstrated that the double-bundle ACL reconstructions can closely restore the normal knee joint kinematics.

CONCLUSION

Even though the grafts were fixed using similar initial tensions and at same flexion angles, the sequence of fixing the two grafts in a double-bundle ACL reconstruction could alter the in situ forces in the grafts and affect the knee kinematics. These data imply that in clinical application of a double-bundle ACL reconstruction, the sequence of graft fixation should be an important surgical parameter.

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING THE DOUBLE-BUNDLE TECHNIQUE – EVALUATION IN THE BIOMECHANICS LABORATORY

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the methodology of knee rotation analysis using biomechanics laboratory instruments and to present the preliminary results from a comparative study on patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the double-bundle technique. Methods: The protocol currently used in our laboratory was described. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis was performed and knee rotation amplitude was measured on eight normal patients (control group) and 12 patients who were operated using the double-bundle technique, by means of three tasks in the biomechanics laboratory. Results: No significant differences between operated and non-operated sides were shown in relation to the mean amplitudes of gait, gait with change in direction or gait with change in direction when going down stairs (p > 0.13). Conclusion: The preliminary results did not show any difference in the double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique in relation to the contralateral side and the control group.

Biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament remnants: how long do they contribute to knee stability after injury in patients with complete tears?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants in anteroposterior and rotational knee stability in patients with a complete ACL injury.

METHODS

ACL remnants were classified into 5 morphologic patterns: group 1, bridging between the posterior cruciate ligament and tibia; group 2, bridging between the intercondylar notch and tibia; group 3, partial rupture of the posterolateral bundle; group 4, partial rupture of the anteromedial bundle; and group 5, no substantial ACL remnants. The decision of whether the remaining bundle represented partial or complete rupture of the ACL was made based on physical, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in a comprehensive manner. Patients in groups 1 (n = 18) and 2 (n = 12) underwent intraoperative arthrometry with a navigation system before and immediately after resection of the ACL remnant. The effects of chronicity (duration between injury and surgery) and ACL remnant pattern on changes in knee laxity after debridement of the ACL remnant were investigated.

RESULTS

Chronicity had a significant effect on changes in anteroposterior knee laxity evaluated at 30° of knee flexion after resection of the ACL remnant (change in laxity of 2.22 mm for chronicity ≤1 year and 0.17 mm for chronicity >1 year). Chronicity did not influence changes in rotational knee stability after resection of the remnant. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 with regard to any of the evaluated changes in knee stability.

CONCLUSIONS

In groups 1 and 2 ACL remnants contributed to anteroposterior knee stability evaluated at 30° of knee flexion for up to 1 year after injury, beyond which this biomechanical function was lost. Chronicity and remnant pattern did not influence changes in rotational knee stability after resection of the remnant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients.

Analysis of return to competition and repeat rupture for 298 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with patellar or hamstring tendon autograft in sportspeople

OBJECTIVES

To establish the influence of the type of surgical technique, competitive level, type of sport and the time before returning to competition on the reinjury rate after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery.

METHODS

The authors followed-up 540 competitive sportspeople who had undergone ACL surgery via patellar or hamstring tendon autograft (HTA) techniques in 2003 and 2004. The sportspeople (all of whom had competed at a regional or higher level) were asked to fill out a questionnaire during their fourth postoperative year.

RESULTS

The 298 respondees (reply rate: 55.1%) had the same characteristics as the initial (operated) population. The reinjury rates after HTA and patellar tendon autograft (PTA) were 12.7 and 6.1%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between these two values (P=0.14). Age and gender were not correlated with the frequency of reinjury. The reinjury rate rose slightly with increasing competitive level (regional level: 8.1%; national level: 10.4%; international level: 12.5%) but these differences were not statistically significant. Soccer had the highest reinjury rate (20.8%). Regardless of the surgical technique, sportspeople returning to competition within seven months of surgery had a greater risk of reinjury than those returning after this time point (15.3 versus 5.2%, P=0.014). The risk dropped from 13.9 to 2.6% (P=0.047) for PTA and from 16.6 to 7.6% (P=0.2) for HTA. Of the four reinjuries in sportspeople returning to competition with the first six months postoperative, three occurred within one month of resumption.

CONCLUSION

Post-HTA reinjury rates are higher than post-PTA rates but the difference is not statistically significant. For sportspeople at a regional or higher level, the time interval before the return to competition has an influence on the risk of reinjury.

ACL reconstruction in sports active people: transtibial DB technique with ST/G vs. transtibial SB technique with BPTB: preliminary results

The single-bundle ACL reconstruction ensures good outcomes and it is a well-established and widespread technique. Nevertheless, some patients still present residual pain and instability. Recent studies have showed that the double-bundle technique restores better natural ACL-fitting kinematics. Long-term clinical studies comparing the two surgical techniques are not frequent and there is no instrument to evaluate function and kinematics during the knee rotation in vivo. In this randomised prospective study performed on sportive people, we compare the BPTB single-bundle ACL reconstruction technique, which is the most common surgical technique performed on these patients' category, with the ACL double-bundle reconstruction technique (DB), in order to evaluate possible differences between the groups. Comparing the two groups, no statistically significant difference regarding the post-operative Lysholm score (p=0.368) the Tegner activity scale (p=0.519) and the arthrometric evaluation with KT-1000 (p=0.74) have been observed. On the contrary, the IKDC evaluation showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.004) better results of the DB group. Moreover, as assessed by the Tegner activity scale, only patients of the DB group were able to return to sports at a pre-injury level. Our data suggest that the double bundle ST/G ACL reconstruction technique results into slightly better outcome than the traditional technique of single-bundle BPTB. The verification and quantification of the advantages of this technique is anticipated with future studies focusing to the accurate measurement of knee rotation during different activities.

Relationship between the pivot shift and Lachman tests: a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

While the Lachman and pivot shift tests have been used clinically for decades to assess the anterior cruciate ligament, the relationship between the two has undergone limited experimental study. The goal of this study was to evaluate biomechanical relationships between the Lachman and pivot shift tests in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees.

METHODS

Knee kinematics during simulated pivot-shift testing and anteroposterior knee laxities were measured in seventeen knees in the intact condition, in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient condition, and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Pivot shift magnitude was plotted against laxity for all knees with the grafts unfixed (the cruciate ligament-deficient condition). The grafts were then tensioned to match the laxities of the intact knees, and the change in pivot shift magnitude was plotted versus the change in laxity for all knees. In a separate series of tests for individual specimens, pivot shift magnitude was plotted versus laxity for each knee by incrementally loosening the anterior cruciate ligament graft.

RESULTS

Linear correlations between pivot shift magnitude and absolute laxity for anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees were weak. When the unfixed grafts were tensioned to match anteroposterior laxities of the intact knees, changes in pivot shift were better correlated with corresponding changes in anteroposterior laxity (r(2) = 0.53 for tibial rotation and 0.73 for lateral tibial plateau displacement). When graft fixation was progressively loosened for each reconstructed knee, pivot shift magnitude increased linearly from the laxity of the intact knee up to an end point of the linear range, at which point the slope decreased abruptly. Between this end point and the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient condition, further increases in pivot shift were relatively small.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the magnitude of laxity of an injured knee, when considered alone, may not accurately predict the magnitude of the pivot shift, but the difference in laxity between the injured knee and the normal knee (the injured-normal difference) could be a good clinical predictor of the injured-normal difference in the pivot shift. We demonstrated that an insufficiently tensioned anterior cruciate ligament graft could substantially reduce anterior laxity, while leaving the pivot shift evaluation virtually unchanged.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by double-bundle technique using multi-strand semitendinosus tendon

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by the double-bundle (DB) technique using multi-strand semitendinosus tendon with that of primary reconstruction by use of the same technique.

METHODS

The study included 21 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction (mean follow-up, 40 months) with the semitendinosus tendon DB technique between 1995 and 2006 and 86 unilateral primary DB ACL reconstructions (mean follow-up, 33 months) between 2000 and 2004. The outcome of both groups was compared based on differences between operated and unoperated limbs and modified International Knee Documentation Committee grades. Both the overall and sports-related subjective scores were evaluated between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The KT measurements (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) averaged 1.7 mm (SD, 1.8 mm) in the revision group and 1.5 mm (SD, 1.6 mm) in the primary group. There was no significant difference in KT measurements between the 2 groups. The Lachman test was negative in 83% of revision cases and 87% of primary cases; the anterior drawer test was negative in 83% and 91%, respectively, and the pivot-shift test was negative in 78% and 90%, respectively. There was a tendency for a positive pivot-shift test in the revision group being higher. The Lysholm score and subjective recovery score were significantly lower in the revision group.

CONCLUSIONS

The semitendinosus tendon DB revision procedure provided range of motion and anterior stability comparable to those after primary DB surgery and a comparable return to athletic activities. However, the patients tended to have positive pivot-shift test results. The revision cases were also inferior in terms of the general evaluation of recovery of knee condition. The outcome scores were lower overall in the revision group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Outcome of arthroscopic single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a preliminary 2-year prospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of arthroscopic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

We designed a prospective study that included patients with an isolated ACL injury. From April 2004 to February 2007, of 147 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, 113 were included in this study. We serially obtained clinical and radiologic data preoperatively and postoperatively. We compared preoperative data and data at 2 years postoperatively in patients who had undergone single-bundle ACL reconstruction versus patients who had undergone double-bundle ACL reconstruction. There were 50 single-bundle reconstructions and 63 double-bundle reconstructions. Anteroposterior stability was assessed objectively by anterior stress radiographs with the telos device (telos, Marburg, Germany) and the maximal manual test with the KT-2000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA). Rotational stability was determined by lateral pivot-shift test. The clinical results were assessed by International Knee Documentation Committee and Orthopadische Arbeitsgruppe Knie scores and Tegner activity scale. In addition, we evaluated postoperative thigh circumference and range of motion.

RESULTS

Residual anteroposterior laxity determined at 2 years postoperatively by telos and KT-2000 was 1.74mm +/- 1.67mm and 1.79mm +/- 1.56mm, respectively, in the single-bundle reconstruction group and 1.63mm +/- 1.50mm and 1.61mm +/- 1.22mm, respectively, in the double-bundle reconstruction group. There were no statistically significant differences. For the lateral pivot-shift test done at 2 years postoperatively, there was no statistically significant difference. In addition, clinical results such as International Knee Documentation Committee score, Orthopadische Arbeitsgruppe Knie score, Tegner activity scale, thigh circumference, and range of motion showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Double-bundle reconstruction of the ACL by a method using 2 femoral tunnel and 2 tibial tunnels showed no differences in stability results or any other clinical aspects or in terms of patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

In situ forces in the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament under simulated functional loading conditions

BACKGROUND

The in situ forces of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral bundles (PL) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) under simulated functional loads such as simulated muscle loads have not been reported. These data are instrumental for improvement of the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

The load-sharing patterns of the 2 bundles are complementary under simulated muscle loads.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric knees in this study were sequentially studied using a robotic testing system. Each knee was tested under 3 external loading conditions including (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load; (2) combined rotational loads of 10 N x m of valgus and 5 N x m internal tibial torques; and (3) a 400-N quadriceps muscle load with the knee at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of flexion. The in situ forces of the 2 bundles of ACL were determined using the principle of superposition.

RESULTS

Under the anterior tibial load, the PL bundle carried peak loads at full extension and concurrently had significantly lower force than the AM bundle throughout the range of flexion (P <.05). Under the combined rotational loads, the PL bundle contributed to carrying the load between 0 degrees and 30 degrees , although less than the AM bundle. Under simulated muscle loads, both bundles carried loads between 0 degrees and 30 degrees . There was no significant difference between the 2 bundle forces at all flexion angles (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Under externally applied loads, in general, the AM bundle carried a greater portion of the load at all flexion angles, whereas the PL bundle only shared the load at low flexion angles. The bundles functioned in a complementary rather than a reciprocal manner to each other.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The data appear to support the concept that both bundles function in a complementary manner. Thus, how to re-create the 2 bundle functions in an ACL reconstruction should be further investigated.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: kinematics and knee flexion angle-graft tension relation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the bundle tension curves and resultant knee kinematics between 2 tensioning protocols in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed in 7 male cadaveric knees. Each graft was tensioned to 22 N under 2 conditions: (1) both bundles tensioned at 20 degrees of knee flexion (20/20 protocol) or (2) posterolateral (PL) bundle tensioned at 15 degrees and anteromedial (AM) bundle at 45 degrees (45/15 protocol). Knee kinematics were recorded in response to anterior and combined rotatory loads in the intact, ACL-deficient, and reconstructed states. Bundle tension was recorded dynamically with knee motion and during each loading test.

RESULTS

Tensioning both bundles at 20 degrees of knee flexion resulted in a reciprocal bundle tension pattern that was not statistically different; the PL bundle tension was greater than the AM bundle tension in full extension, and the AM bundle tension was greater than the PL bundle tension from 25 degrees to 120 degrees. In the second tensioning protocol, the AM bundle tension was significantly greater than the PL bundle tension at all flexion angles. Both tensioning protocols restored normal knee kinematics.

CONCLUSIONS

Bundle-tensioning protocol is a variable that has a significant effect on the bundle-loading patterns in double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The 20/20 protocol resulted in AM and PL bundle-loading patterns that were equivalent during dynamic testing, whereas the 45/15 protocol led to excessive tension in the AM bundle in full extension. We recommend equal tensioning of both bundles with the knee at 20 degrees of flexion to restore relatively normal tension curves in each bundle and to avoid excessive stress on the AM bundle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In double-bundle ACL reconstruction, there is no consensus regarding bundle-tensioning protocols. This study provides data on the individual bundle tension curves that result from 2 commonly used tensioning protocols. These data will assist clinicians as the technique and application of double-bundle ACL reconstruction move forward.

Comparison between single-and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction popularity is increasing with the aim to reproduce native ACL anatomy and improve ACL reconstruction outcome. However, to date, only a few randomized clinical studies have been published.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the clinical results of single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Seventy patients with a chronic unilateral ACL rupture who underwent arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction using a hamstring graft were randomized to receive a single- (SB) or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction. Both groups were comparable with regard to preoperative data. A double-incision surgical technique was adopted in both groups. The graft was fixed by looping the hamstring tendons around a bony (DB) or a metallic (SB) bridge on the tibial side and with interference screws reinforced with a staple on the femur. The same rehabilitation protocol was adopted. Outcome assessment was performed by a blinded, independent observer using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the new International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation.

RESULTS

All the patients reached a minimum follow-up of 2 years. No differences between the 2 groups were observed in terms of KOOS and IKDC subjective score. A statistically significant difference in favor of the DB group was found with the VAS (P < .03). The objective IKDC final scores showed statistically significantly more "normal knees" in the DB group than in the SB group (P = .03). There was 1 stability failure in the DB group and 3 in the SB group. The KT-1000 arthrometer data showed a statistically significant decrease in the average anterior tibial translation in the DB group (1.2 mm DB vs 2.1 mm SB; P < .03). The incidence of a residual pivot-shift glide was 14% in DB and 26% in SB (P = .08).

CONCLUSION

In the 2-year minimum follow-up, DB ACL reconstructions showed better VAS, anterior knee laxity, and final objective IKDC scores than SB. However, longer follow-up and accurate instrumented in vivo rotational stability assessment are needed.

Effect of knee flexion angle on length and orientation of posterolateral femoral tunnel drilled through anteromedial portal during anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate the radiologic orientation and length of the posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel when drilled through the anteromedial (AM) portal at 90 degrees, 110 degrees, and 130 degrees of flexion.

METHODS

In 9 fresh cadaveric knees the anterior cruciate ligament was excised and 2.4-mm guidewires were drilled through the center of the PL bundle footprint through an accessory AM portal. Pins were advanced, in a retrograde manner, until flush with the notch wall and left in place. Outcomes were measured by use of plain anteroposterior, lateral, and tunnel radiographs to determine tunnel orientation and clock position, and direct measurement was performed to determine the intraosseous length, the shortest distance to the posterior bone cortex, and the distance to the lateral collateral ligament attachment on the lateral aspect of the femoral condyle.

RESULTS

With regard to tunnel orientation, each increase in knee flexion angle resulted in a more horizontal tunnel on both the lateral and anteroposterior views. On the tunnel view, the PL guidewire became more vertical with knee flexion. The mean clock position was 9 o'clock (standard deviation [SD], 00:12). No significant difference in the intraosseous length of the guidewires was observed. According to our hypothesis, knee flexion influenced the PL tunnel characteristics. At 90 degrees of flexion, the guidewire may blow out the posterior cortex of the lateral femoral condyle.

CONCLUSIONS

A PL femoral tunnel drilled through the AM portal becomes more horizontal with bending of the knee during drilling. At 90 degrees, the tunnel is at risk of back wall blowout.

Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Optimal tunnel placement is critical in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery, yet the method used to drill the tunnels may compromise their placement.

HYPOTHESIS

An independent drilling method versus a conventional transtibial drilling method will place tunnels in different locations and produce reconstructions with different kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten pairs of knees had anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions produced by either a conventional transtibial drilling method or an independent drilling method. The location of the tunnels was recorded, and the knees were tested for laxity in the normal state, with the anterior cruciate ligament removed, and with the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed. A surgical navigation system guided the placement of the independently drilled tunnels and measured joint laxity in response to various combinations of anterior force and rotational torques.

RESULTS

The conventional transtibial drilling method used in this study placed tibial tunnels posterior and femoral tunnels superior relative to their footprints and resulted in more vertical grafts. In contrast, the independently drilled tibial and femoral tunnels were more anterior and central in their respective footprints, resulting in more horizontal grafts. The horizontal grafts of the independent drilling method were superior to the vertical grafts of this study's transtibial drilling method in restoring normal anterior and rotational knee laxity.

CONCLUSION

An independent drilling method can produce tunnels with superior function compared with tunnels produced by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions will be improved if grafts are centered in their anatomical insertions by an independent drilling method versus grafts placed by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

Validation of the position of the femoral tunnels in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 3-D CT scan

This study compares the positioning of femoral AM and PL tunnels obtained with specific ancillary instruments during anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with the native ACL footprint using three-dimensional computed tomography (3-D CT). In 35 consecutive patients, anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed with specific ancillary instruments. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction of both knees was performed using the volume rendering technique. In the controls (contralateral knee, with intact ACL), the angle between the longitudinal axis of the footprint and the axis of the femur, the "footprint angle" (FA) was measured. On the involved side, using the axis passing through the tunnel centers, FA was also measured. In both the groups, footprint's length and width, and distances to cartilage margins were measured. FA was 28.1 degrees +/- 5.0 degrees in the controls and 32.9 degrees +/- 15.8 degrees on the involved side (n.s.). There was no statistical difference between the two groups for the other morphometric parameters: footprint's length and width, and distances to cartilage margins. Using specific ancillary instruments the morphometric parameters of the reconstructed femoral ACL footprint were similar to the native ACL.

Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction has been thought to better simulate the anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. It is, however, a technically challenging procedure, associated with longer operation time and higher cost.

HYPOTHESIS

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a single femoral and tibial tunnel can closely reproduce intact knee kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knee specimens were tested using a robotic testing system to investigate the kinematic response of the knee joint under an anterior tibial load (130 N), simulated quadriceps load (400 N), and combined torques (5 N.m valgus and 5 N.m internal tibial torques) at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion. Each knee was tested sequentially under 4 conditions: (1) anterior cruciate ligament intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament deficient, (3) single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon, and (4) single-tunnel-double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the same tunnels and quadrupled hamstring tendon graft as in the single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

RESULTS

Single-tunnel-double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction more closely restored the intact knee kinematics than single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at low flexion angles (< or =30 degrees ) under the anterior tibial load and simulated muscle load (P < .05). However, single-tunnel-double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction overconstrained the knee joint at high flexion angles (> or =60 degrees ) under the anterior tibial load and at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion under combined torques.

CONCLUSION

This double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a single tunnel can better restore anterior tibial translations to the intact level compared with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at low flexion angles, but it overconstrained the knee joint at high flexion angles.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This technique could be an alternative for both single-bundle and double-tunnel-double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions to reproduce intact knee kinematics and native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy.

Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons

The objective of this article is to describe the clinical outcome of the transitional double-bundle procedure for anatomical ACL reconstruction. Subjects included 78 patients (average age 25 years) who had undergone ACL reconstruction with the transitional double-bundle procedure with multi-stranded hamstring tendons. The femoral socket for the anteromedial (AM) graft was created at 5-6 mm from the mid-sagittal line of the intercondylar notch at 2:00 or 10:00, and that for the posterolateral (PL) graft was drilled adjacent to the AM socket at 3:00 or 9:00. For the tibial side, two tunnels were made at the center of the footprint of the AM and PL bundles of the normal ACL. Patients were evaluated at 24 months or longer postoperatively based on the IKDC Knee Examination Form. Subjectively, 32 knees (41%) were graded as normal; 41 (53%), as nearly normal; 4 (5%), as abnormal; and 1 (1%) as graft rupture by re-injury. The average side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-2000 arthrometer was 0.9 mm +/- 1.2. Seventy patients (93%) had a range between -1 mm and 2 mm. In conclusion the transitional double-bundle ACL reconstruction provided a satisfactory outcome after a short-term follow-up.

Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a navigation system.

METHODS

Ninety patients who received navigated double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 21.9 years. During reconstruction, pivot-shift tests were performed 4 times: before reconstruction, after the posterolateral bundle fixation, after the anteromedial bundle fixation, and after the double-bundle reconstruction. Both tibial internal rotation and anterior translation under the pivot-shift test were measured at each phase by the additional functions of the navigation. The navigation system used in this study was the image-free, which does not require preoperative or intraoperative images, OrthoPilot ACL (version 2.0; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany).

RESULTS

Before ACL reconstruction, average (+/- standard deviation) tibial internal rotation and anterior translation under the pivot-shift test were 23.7 degrees +/- 6.1 degrees and 5.2 +/- 2.4 mm. They were significantly decreased to 20.9 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees and 2.3 +/- 1.1 mm after the posterolateral bundle fixation, and also decreased to 22.2 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees and 2.4 +/- 1.1 mm after the anteromedial bundle fixation. There was no significant difference between the groups. After double-bundle reconstruction, they improved to 20.3 degrees +/- 6.3 degrees and 2.0 +/- 1.0 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that both the posterolateral and the anteromedial bundle similarly control both anterior translation and internal rotation during pivot-shift testing. Double-bundle reconstruction may further improve knee stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients with universally applied reference gold standard.