Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years' follow-up

Mesenchymal stem cells in orthopaedics: A systematic review of applications to practice

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have alluring interest for clinical use in orthopaedics based on their therapeutic potential through directed pluripotent differentiation. While many studies and reviews have discussed the importance of this approach, few have reduced it to practice using reproducible criteria. This study was designed to systematically review and synthesize current evidence regarding clinical use of clearly defined MSCs in orthopaedics.

Methods

Studies of any level of evidence and sample size, regardless of MSC source, orthopaedic pathology, and patient population, were reviewed. In vitro and animal studies, and articles written in a language other than English, were excluded. Studies were then screened for final inclusion based on documented MSC verification using testing of the therapeutic cellular population for at least one of the following phenotypic markers: CD 73, CD 90, and CD 105. In addition, therapeutic cellular populations could not have higher percentages of CD34, CD45, CD14, HLA-DR, CD11b, or CD19 markers compared to the aforementioned markers. From each studies' results, sample size, procedural methods, radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes, patient-report outcomes (PROs), and adverse events were tabulated.

Results

Overall, 43 studies were included. Twenty-three studies (53.5 %) derived their MSCs from iliac crest bone marrow while 12 (27.9 %) studied adipose-derived MSCs. Included studies explored MSC use in Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Defects, Osteonecrosis, Bone Defects and Nonunions, Spine, and Other. MSC use in all pathologies led to improvement of studied radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions

Mesenchymal stem cells have proven to have successful and safe uses in multiple orthopaedic applications, including treating chondral defects, osteoarthritis, and osteonecrosis. A stringent and reproducible process for evaluating obtained human stem cells using CD markers for clinical use is necessary to both evaluate previous studies and continue to evaluate for future uses.

Level of evidence

Level V.

Regenerative Inflammation: The Mechanism Explained from the Perspective of Buffy-Coat Protagonism and Macrophage Polarization

The buffy-coat, a layer of leukocytes and platelets obtained from peripheral blood centrifugation, plays a crucial role in tissue regeneration and the modulation of inflammatory responses. This article explores the mechanisms of regenerative inflammation, highlighting the critical role of the buffy-coat in influencing macrophage polarization and its therapeutic potential. Macrophage polarization into M1 and M2 subtypes is pivotal in balancing inflammation and tissue repair, with M1 macrophages driving pro-inflammatory responses and M2 macrophages promoting tissue healing and regeneration. The buffy-coat's rich composition of progenitor cells, cytokines, and growth factors-such as interleukin-10, transforming growth factor-β, and monocyte colony-stimulating factor-supports the transition from M1 to M2 macrophages, enhancing tissue repair and the resolution of inflammation. This dynamic interaction between buffy-coat components and macrophages opens new avenues for therapeutic strategies aimed at improving tissue regeneration and managing inflammatory conditions, particularly in musculoskeletal diseases such as osteoarthritis. Furthermore, the use of buffy-coat-derived therapies in conjunction with other regenerative modalities, such as platelet-rich plasma, holds promise for more effective clinical outcomes.

Mechanical properties and biocompatibility characterization of 3D printed collagen type II/silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid scaffold

Damage to articular cartilage is irreversible and its ability to heal is minimal. The development of articular cartilage in tissue engineering requires suitable biomaterials as scaffolds that provide a 3D natural microenvironment for the development and growth of articular cartilage. This study aims to investigate the applicability of a 3D printed CSH (collagen type II/silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid) scaffold for constructing cartilage tissue engineering. The results showed that the composite scaffold had a three-dimensional porous network structure with uniform pore sizes and good connectivity. The hydrophilicity of the composite scaffold was 1071.7 ± 131.6%, the porosity was 85.12 ± 1.6%, and the compressive elastic modulus was 36.54 ± 2.28 kPa. The creep and stress relaxation constitutive models were also established, which could well describe the visco-elastic mechanical behavior of the scaffold. The biocompatibility experiments showed that the CSH scaffold was very suitable for the adhesion and proliferation of chondrocytes. Under dynamic compressive loading conditions, it was able to promote cell adhesion and proliferation on the scaffold surface. The 3D printed CSH scaffold is expected to be ideal for promoting articular cartilage regeneration.

Efficacy and safety of culture-expanded mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in the treatment of 4 types of inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

Two researchers conducted a comprehensive search of Chinese and English databases from their inception until July 2023. The literature screening and data extraction were then performed. Statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 36 relevant RCTs, involving 2,076 participants, were ultimately included in this study. These RCTs encompassed four types of inflammatory arthritis, namely rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The results demonstrated that MSC therapy exhibited improvements in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain in OA patients (bone marrow: SMD=-0.95, 95 % CI: -1.55 to -0.36, P = 0.002; umbilical cord: SMD=-2.03, 95 % CI: -2.99 to -1.07, P < 0.0001; adipose tissue: SMD=-1.26, 95 % CI: -1.99 to -0.52, P = 0.0009). Specifically, MSCs sourced from adipose tissue showed enhancements in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain (P = 0.0001), WOMAC physical function (P = 0.001), and total WOMAC scores (P = 0.0003). As for MSC therapy in RA, AS, and SSc, the current systematic review suggests a potential therapeutic effect of MSCs on these inflammatory arthritic conditions. Safety assessments indicated that MSC therapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

MSCs have the potential to alleviate joint pain and improve joint function in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Moreover, MSC therapy appears to be relatively safe and could be considered as a viable alternative treatment option for inflammatory arthritis.

Is microfracture sufficient for high-tibial osteotomy, or should intra-articular hyaluronic acid and oral glucosamine-chondroitin be used as additional treatments?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effects of microfracture (MF) versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) + oral glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate (GC) in addition to MF in patients with osteoarthritic knees who underwent medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) after an average follow-up of five years.

METHODS

The study was designed retrospectively and included patients who underwent MOWHTO due to gonarthrosis, the MF method performed on these patients, and HA + GC treatments applied in addition to MF. Three groups consisting of 79 patients were formed: only HTO (Group 1), HTO + MF (Group 2), and HTO + MF + HA + GC (Group 3). The groups were compared using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM). The associations between the degree of correction and function and pain were evaluated. Additionally, the KOOS subparameters were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in the postoperative KOOS and VAS scores in all three groups (p < 0.05). However, the ROM did not improve in Group 1. There was no significant difference in the postoperative KOOS, VAS, or ROM values ​​between Groups 2 and 3, but these values ​​were significantly better in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (p < 0.05). When the degree of correction increased, there were no significant positive changes in the postoperative KOOS or VAS score in Group 1, unlike in the other two groups (p < 0.05). In corrections of ≥ 10°, while there was no significant difference in the postoperative KOOS or VAS score ​​between Groups 2 and 3, these parameters significantly improved in these two groups compared to Group 1 (p < 0.05). Among the KOOS subparameters, pain and activities of daily living scores ​​were greater in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In MOWHTO, MF is a sufficient treatment method that improves the patient's clinical condition without requiring additional treatments such as HA and GC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Human Urine-Derived iPSCs Exhibit Low Immunogenicity and Reduced Immunomodulatory Profile

Human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (iMSCs) represent a promising and renewable cell source for therapeutic applications. A systematic evaluation of the immunological properties and engraftment potential of iMSCs generated from urine-derived iPSCs is lacking, which has impeded their broader application. In this study, we differentiated urine-derived iPSCs into iMSCs and assessed their fundamental MSC characteristics, immunogenicity, immunomodulatory capacity and in vivo engraftment. Compared to umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UCMSCs), iMSCs demonstrated an enhanced proliferative capacity, a higher level of regenerative gene expression, and lower immunogenicity, strengthening resistance to apoptosis induced by allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the NK-92 cell line. In addition, iMSCs exhibited a diminished ability to inhibit T cell proliferation and activation compared with UCMSCs. Transcriptomic analyses further revealed the decreased expression of immune regulatory factors in iMSCs. After transfusion into mouse models, iMSCs engrafted in the lungs, liver, and spleen and exhibited the ability to migrate to tumor tissues. Our results indicated that iMSCs generated from urine-derived iPSCs have a significant replicative capacity, low immunogenicity and unique immunomodulatory properties, and hence offer obvious advantages in immune privilege and allogenic therapeutic application prospects.

Advanced therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells for knee osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Advanced cell therapies emerged as promising candidates for treatment of knee articular diseases, but robust evidence regarding their clinical applicability is still lacking.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of advanced mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and chondral lesions.

Methods

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with Cochrane Handbook and reported following PRISMA checklist. GRADE approach was used for assessing the evidence certainty.

Results

25 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 1048 participants were included. Meta-analyses data showed that, compared to viscosupplementation (VS), advanced MSC therapy resulted in a 1.91 lower pain VAS score (95 % CI -3.23 to -0.59; p < 0.00001) for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months. Compared to placebo, the difference was 0.99 lower pain VAS points (95 % CI -1.94 to -0.03; p = 0.76). According to the GRADE approach, the evidence was very uncertain for both comparisons. By excluding studies with high risk of bias, there was a similar size of effect (VAS MD -1.54, 95 % CI -2.09 to -0.98; p = 0.70) with improved (moderate) certainty of evidence, suggesting that MSC therapy probably reduces pain slightly better than VS. Regarding serious adverse events, there was no difference from advanced MSC therapy to placebo or to VS, with very uncertain evidence.

Conclusion

Advanced MSC therapy resulted in lower pain compared to placebo or VS for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months, with no difference in adverse events. However, the evidence was considered uncertain.

The Translational Potential of this Article

Currently, there is a lack of studies with good methodological structure aiming to evaluate the real clinical impact of advanced cell therapy for knee OA. The present study was well structured and conducted, with Risk of Bias, GRADE certainty assessment and sensitivity analysis. It explores the translational aspect of the benefits and safety of MSC compared with placebo and gold-standard therapy to give practitioners and researchers support to expand this therapy in their practice.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42020158173. Access at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158173.

Should I add orthobiologics to my knee osteotomy practice? A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Orthobiologics has seen a renaissance over the last decade as an adjunct therapy during osteotomy due to the limited inherent regenerative potential of damaged intraarticular tissues.

AIM OR OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to present the latest evidence regarding using orthobiologics with simultaneous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for knee osteoarthritis. The results of this study may guide surgeons to improve their clinical results and clear the air regarding confusion over whether or not to add orthobiologics to HTO in clinical practice backed by scientific evidence.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

According to PRISMA guidelines a systematic search for relevant literature was performed in the PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases of all studies published in English from January 1990 to May 2023. The following search terms were entered into the title, abstract, and keyword fields: "knee" or "osteotomy" AND "valgus" or "varus" AND "regenerative medicine" or "PRP" or "mesenchymal stem cells" or "stem cells" or "BMAC" or "bone marrow" or "growth factors" or "umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell" or "stromal vascular fraction". The AMSTAR-2 checklist was used to confirm the quality of the systematic review. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series were included. Studies that reported clinical outcomes in patients treated with knee osteotomy for varus/valgus knee with concomitant adjunction of regenerative treatment [Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived (HUCBD), Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), stromal vascular fraction (SVF)] were included. The outcome measures extracted from the studies were the KOOS score, Lysholm score, Subjective IKDC, WOMAC Score, KSS, Tegner, HSS, radiographic tibiofemoral angle, posterior tibial slope and complications. The current systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO Registry (CRD42023439379).

FINDINGS

Osteotomy for unicompartmental arthritis with adjunction of orthobiologics such as PRP, ADSC, HVCBD, MSC, BMAC, and SVF presents a consistent statistically significant clinical improvement compared to preoperative scores regardless of the treatment modality used and there were no notable complications associated with the use of these novel agents.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Orthobiologics and knee osteotomies could improve outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis desiring Knee preservation surgeries. However, only a few studies are available on the topic to conclude anything with certainty, the patients included in the studies could not be disintegrated based on the grade of osteoarthritis (OA), type, dosage and frequency of administration of orthobiologic and type of additional surgical procedures used. Therefore, better-structured RCTs are required to implement this finding into routine Orthopaedic practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Objectives

Osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative disease that affects many people worldwide. The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the setting of osteoarthritis has been explored by many clinical trials in the literature. Exploring these clinical trials is important for assessing the benefit of this modality in the setting of osteoarthritis.

Methods

On November 9, 2022, a search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE databases to explore clinical trials involving MSC injections for osteoarthritis. Only articles that were clinical trials, explored the use of MSC injections in osteoarthritis, involved human subjects, and written in English language, were included. Relevant data was extracted from the included trials.

Results

A total of 43 trials were included (N=43). The knee was most the commonly explored joint (95.4%), and adipose tissue was the most commonly utilized MSC source (49%). All but one trial (97.7%) reported clinical improvement in the MSC group on follow up, and 33 trials (76.7%) reported better clinical outcomes in the MSC groups when compared to control groups. Twenty-three trials (53.5%) used imaging to evaluate outcomes following MSC injections, out of which twenty (46.5%) reported improvements in the affected joint. Similarly, four trials (9.3%) used second look arthroscopy, out of which three (7%) reported better outcomes on follow up.

Conclusion

While published trials show good therapeutic potential for MSC injections in the setting of osteoarthritis, several discrepancies render the efficiency and reliability of this modality equivocal. The adoption of standardized protocols, employment of comprehensive evaluation tools, and reporting negative results is essential in order to appropriately assess the utility of MSC injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

High tibial osteotomy combined with cartilage restoration: A systematic review of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors

Background

Focal chondral defects are often treated with cartilage restoration procedures. Malalignment often accompanies chondral defects. High tibial osteotomy (HTO), classically utilized to treat uni-compartmental knee osteoarthritis, corrects malalignment. HTO combined with cartilage restoration procedures can treat uni-compartmental osteoarthritis and focal chondral defects.

Purpose

To assess outcomes of combined HTO and cartilage restoration procedures and review prognostic factors that may assist in preoperative planning and patient counseling.

Study design

Systematic Review of published literature.

Methods

A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Thirty-four papers were included in qualitative considerations.

Results

Thirty-four papers that reported the combined outcome of HTO and cartilage repair were included. Twenty of the 34 included papers reported prognostic factors that affected the success or failure of combined HTO and cartilage repair surgery for focal articular defect and uni-compartmental knee osteoarthritis. Cartilage repair techniques that were combined with HTO and included in this review are bone marrow stimulation, allograft transplantation, osteochondral autograft transplantation, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and mesenchymal stem cell implantation.

Conclusions

HTO with adjunctive cartilage repair procedures improve clinical outcome scores and restore alignment in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis and isolated focal chondral defects. HTO with adjunctive cartilage procedures produces optimal results in younger, non-obese patients with focal chondral defects and varus malalignment, without significant lateral compartment and patellofemoral involvement.

The Dual Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Joint Osteoarthritis: Their Global and Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Molecule-Based Pathogenic and Therapeutic Effects

OA is the most common joint disease that affects approximately 7% of the global population. Current treatment methods mainly relieve its symptoms with limited repairing effect on joint destructions, which ultimately contributes to the high morbidity rate of OA. Stem cell treatment is a potential regenerative medical therapy for joint repair in OA, but the uncertainty in differentiation direction and immunogenicity limits its clinical usage. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), the by-products secreted by stem cells, show similar efficacy levels but have safer regenerative repair effect without potential adverse outcomes, and have recently drawn attention from the broader research community. A series of research works and reviews have been performed in the last decade, providing references for the application of various exogenous therapeutic sEVs for treating OA. However, the clinical potential of target intervention involving endogenous pathogenic sEVs in the treatment of OA is still under-explored and under-discussed. In this review, and for the first time, we emphasize the dual role of sEVs in OA and explain the effects of sEVs on various joint tissues from both the pathogenic and therapeutic aspects. Our aim is to provide a reference for future research in the field.

Augmenting mesenchymal stem cell therapy for osteoarthritis via inflammatory priming: a comparative study on mesenchymal stem cells derived from various perinatal tissue sources

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative disease prevalent among the elderly, poses significant challenges due to its high incidence and disability rates. Regrettably, there exists a lack of effective regenerative therapies for the irreversible degradation of cartilage in OA. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), known for their robust differentiation and immune regulatory capabilities, have emerged as promising candidates for OA treatment. MSCs sourced from perinatal tissues offer the dual advantage of convenience in extraction and ethical non-controversy. However, the heterogeneous nature of MSCs derived from different perinatal tissue sources gives rise to varying therapeutic indications. Moreover, the immune response of MSCs may be modulated under the influence of inflammatory factors. Methods: In this study, we isolated mesenchymal stem cells from distinct parts of human perinatal tissue: umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs), fetal placenta-derived MSCs (FP-MSCs), and umbilical cord placental junction-derived MSCs (CPJ-MSCs). These cells were cultured in vitro and subjected to a 24-hour treatment with the inflammatory mediator Interleukin-1β (IL-1β). Subsequently, the MSCs were evaluated for changes in proliferation, migration, and regulatory capabilities. To assess the comparative anti-injury potential of MSCs from different sources, primary articular chondrocytes (ACs) were exposed to H2O2-induced injury and co-cultured with IL-1β-primed MSCs. Changes in the proliferation, migration, and regulatory abilities of ACs resembling those observed in OA were examined. Results: Following IL-1β treatment, all three types of MSCs displayed decreased rates of proliferation and migration. Notably, their chondrogenic differentiation capacities exhibited an enhancement. Additionally, diverse MSCs exhibited a degree of efficacy in restoring damaged ACs in vitro. Among these, CPJ-MSCs demonstrated superior potential in promoting cartilage cell proliferation, while FP-MSCs displayed notable anti-inflammatory effects. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the substantial capacity of primed FP-MSCs and CPJ-MSCs to alleviate the injury in OA-like ACs. Consequently, this study advocates for the prospective use of preconditioning strategies involving FP-MSCs and CPJ-MSCs in forthcoming OA therapies.

Biological intra-articular augmentation for osteotomy in knee osteoarthritis: strategies and results : A systematic review of the literature from the ESSKA Orthobiologics Initiative

PURPOSE

To assess whether there is evidence supporting the use of augmentation strategies, either cartilage surgical procedures or injective orthobiologic options, to improve the results of osteotomies in knees with osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases in January 2023 on osteotomies around the knee associated with augmentation strategies (either cartilage surgical procedures or injective orthobiologic options), reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look/histological outcomes at any follow-up. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).

RESULTS

Out of the 7650 records identified from the databases, 42 articles were included for a total of 3580 patients and 3609 knees treated; 33 articles focused on surgical treatments and 9 on injective treatments performed in association with knee osteotomy. Out of the 17 comparative studies with surgical augmentation, only 1 showed a significant clinical benefit of an augmentation procedure with a regenerative approach. Overall, other studies showed no differences with reparative techniques and even detrimental outcomes with microfractures. Regarding injective procedures, viscosupplementation showed no improvement, while the use of platelet-rich plasma or cell-based products derived from both bone marrow and adipose tissue showed overall positive tissue changes which translated into a clinical benefit. The mean modified CMS score was 60.0 ± 12.1.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to support the effectiveness of cartilage surgical treatments combined with osteotomies in terms of pain relief and functional recovery of patients affected by OA in misaligned joints. Orthobiologic injective treatments targeting the whole joint environment showed promising findings. However, overall the available literature presents a limited quality with only few heterogeneous studies investigating each treatment option. This ORBIT systematic analysis will help surgeons to choose their therapeutic strategy according to the available evidence, and to plan further and better studies to optimize biologic intra-articular osteotomy augmentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived exosomes in animal models of central nervous system diseases: Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome

The NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is a multimeric protein complex that is engaged in the innate immune system and plays a vital role in inflammatory reactions. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent release of proinflammatory cytokines can be triggered by microbial infection or cellular injury. The NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many disorders affecting the central nervous system (CNS), ranging from stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and depression. Furthermore, emerging evidence has suggested that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their exosomes may modulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in a way that might be promising for the therapeutic management of CNS diseases. In the present review, particular focus is placed on highlighting and discussing recent scientific evidence regarding the regulatory effects of MSC-based therapies on the NLRP3 inflammasome activation and their potential to counteract proinflammatory responses and pyroptotic cell death in the CNS, thereby achieving neuroprotective impacts and improvement in behavioral impairments.

Exosomes Derived from Hypoxia-Cultured Human Adipose Stem Cells Alleviate Articular Chondrocyte Inflammaging and Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Progression

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common age-related degenerative joint disease. Inflammaging, linking inflammation and aging, is found in senescent cells with the secretions of matrix-degrading proteins and proinflammatory cytokines. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) plays a very important role in OA progression. However, there remains no effective way to suppress OA progression, especially by suppressing inflammaging and/or the chondrocyte SASP. Recent studies have shown that exosomes derived from hypoxia-cultured BMSCs can regenerate cartilage in OA animal models. Some reports have further indicated that exosomes secreted from MSCs contribute to the efficacy of MSC therapy in OA. However, whether hypoxia-cultured ADSC-secreted exosomes (hypoxia-ADSC-Exos) can alleviate the chondrocyte SASP or OA progression remains unclear. Accordingly, we hypothesized that hypoxia-ADSC-Exos have a beneficial effect on the normal functions of human articular chondrocytes (HACs), can attenuate the SASP of OA-like HACs in vitro, and further suppress OA progression in rats. Hypoxia-ADSC-Exos were derived from ADSCs cultured in 1% O2 and 10% de-Exo-FBS for 48 h. The molecular and cell biological effects of hypoxia-ADSC-Exos were tested on IL1-β-induced HACs as OA-like HACs in vitro, and the efficacy of OA treatment was tested in ACLT-induced OA rats. The results showed that hypoxia-ADSC-Exos had the best effect on GAG formation in normal HACs rather than those cultured in normoxia or hypoxia plus 2% de-Exo-FBS. We further found that hypoxia-ADSC-Exos alleviated the harmful effect in OA-like HACs by decreasing markers of normal cartilage (GAG and type II collagen) and increasing markers of fibrous or degenerative cartilage (type I or X collagen), matrix degradation enzymes (MMP13 and ADAMT5), and inflammatory cytokines (TNFα and IL-6). More importantly, intra-articular treatment with hypoxia-ADSC-Exos suppressed OA progression, as evidenced by the weight-bearing function test and cartilage GAG quantification in ACLT rats. Moreover, through NGS and bioinformatic analysis, seven potential miRNAs were found in hypoxia-ADSC-Exos, which may contribute to regulating cellular oxidative stress and attenuating cell senescence. In summary, we demonstrated that hypoxia-ADSC-Exos, carrying potent miRNAs, not only improve normal HAC function but also alleviate HAC inflammaging and OA progression. The results suggest that hypoxia-ADSC-Exo treatment may offer another strategy for future OA therapy.

Clinical utility of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in regenerative medicine and cellular therapy

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been carefully examined to have tremendous potential in regenerative medicine. With their immunomodulatory and regenerative properties, MSCs have numerous applications within the clinical sector. MSCs have the properties of multilineage differentiation, paracrine signaling, and can be isolated from various tissues, which makes them a key candidate for applications in numerous organ systems. To accentuate the importance of MSC therapy for a range of clinical indications, this review highlights MSC-specific studies on the musculoskeletal, nervous, cardiovascular, and immune systems where most trials are reported. Furthermore, an updated list of the different types of MSCs used in clinical trials, as well as the key characteristics of each type of MSCs are included. Many of the studies mentioned revolve around the properties of MSC, such as exosome usage and MSC co-cultures with other cell types. It is worth noting that MSC clinical usage is not limited to these four systems, and MSCs continue to be tested to repair, regenerate, or modulate other diseased or injured organ systems. This review provides an updated compilation of MSCs in clinical trials that paves the way for improvement in the field of MSC therapy.

Clinical Trials with Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Challenges in the Regeneration of Articular Cartilage

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a whole-joint disease primarily characterized by the deterioration of hyaline cartilage. Current treatments include microfracture and chondrocyte implantation as early surgical strategies that can be combined with scaffolds to repair osteochondral lesions; however, intra-articular (IA) injections or implantations of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are new approaches that have presented encouraging therapeutic results in animal models and humans. We critically reviewed clinical trials with MSC therapies for OA, focusing on their effectiveness, quality, and outcomes in the regeneration of articular cartilage. Several sources of autologous or allogeneic MSCs were used in the clinical trials. Minor adverse events were generally reported, indicating that IA applications of MSCs are potentially safe. The evaluation of articular cartilage regeneration in human clinical trials is challenging, particularly in the inflammatory environment of osteoarthritic joints. Our findings indicate that IA injections of MSCs are efficacious in the treatment of OA and the regeneration of cartilage, but that they may be insufficient for the full repair of articular cartilage defects. The possible interference of clinical and quality variables in the outcomes suggests that robust clinical trials are still necessary for generating reliable evidence with which to support these treatments. We suggest that the administration of just-sufficient doses of viable cells in appropriate regimens is critical to achieve effective and durable effects. In terms of future perspectives, genetic modification, complex products with extracellular vesicles derived from MSCs, cell encapsulation in hydrogels, and 3D bioprinted tissue engineering are promising approaches with which to improve MSC therapies for OA.

Anatomy, molecular structures, and hyaluronic acid - Gelatin injectable hydrogels as a therapeutic alternative for hyaline cartilage recovery: A review

Cartilage damage caused by trauma or osteoarthritis is a common joint disease that can increase the social and economic burden in society. Due to its avascular characteristics, the poor migration ability of chondrocytes, and a low number of progenitor cells, the self-healing ability of cartilage defects has been significantly limited. Hydrogels have been developed into one of the most suitable biomaterials for the regeneration of cartilage because of its characteristics such as high-water absorption, biodegradation, porosity, and biocompatibility similar to natural extracellular matrix. Therefore, the present review article presents a conceptual framework that summarizes the anatomical, molecular structure and biochemical properties of hyaline cartilage located in long bones: articular cartilage and growth plate. Moreover, the importance of preparation and application of hyaluronic acid - gelatin hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering are included. Hydrogels possess benefits of stimulating the production of Agc1, Col2α1-IIa, and SOX9, molecules important for the synthesis and composition of the extracellular matrix of cartilage. Accordingly, they are believed to be promising biomaterials of therapeutic alternatives to treat cartilage damage.

Intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) or adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective comparative clinical trial

BACKGROUND

We determined whether autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) injections provide clinical and functional improvements in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients, and whether the results differ between autologous bone marrow cells (BMAC) and adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs).

METHODS

Between January 2021 and April 2022, 51 patients undergoing intra-articular injection of BMAC and 51 patients undergoing intra-articular injection of ADSCs were prospectively recruited. The Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) classification was used to grade the severity of osteoarthritis. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and visual analog scale (VAS) were collected for all 102 patients in the previous week before the procedures, and at the one and 6 months from injection.

RESULTS

Knee KOOS scores, knee OKS scores, and VAS pain scores changed in similar ways in the two treatment groups. Both treatment groups demonstrated significant improvement pre-procedure to post-procedure in knee KOOS scores (p < 0.0001), knee OKS scores (p < 0.0001), and VAS pain scores (p < 0.0001). Patients with K-L grade 2 showed better functional and clinical outcomes than patients with K-L grades 3 and 4 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Both intra-articular BMAC and ADSC injections significantly improved pain and functional outcomes at 6-month follow-up in patients with KOA. The difference between BMAC and ADCSs groups as tissue sources of MSCs was not statistically significant in terms of clinical and functional outcomes.

A systematic review, umbrella review, and quality assessment on clinical translation of stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis: Are we there yet?

BACKGROUND

The success of stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in preclinical animal models has accelerated the pace of clinical translation. However, it remains uncertain whether the current scientific evidence supports the clinical application of stem cells in treating KOA. A comprehensive evaluation of the safety and efficacy of stem cell therapies and scientific evidence quality is necessary.

METHODS

Using "stem cells" and "knee osteoarthritis" as the search terms, several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov, were searched on August 25, 2022, and updated on February 27, 2023. Clinical studies that reported adverse reactions (ARs) of stem cell therapy in KOA patients were included without limiting the type of studies. Quantitative systematic reviews of stem cell therapy for KOA that conducted meta-analysis were included. Two researchers conducted literature screening and data extraction independently, and the evidence quality was evaluated according to the Institute of Health Economics and AMSTAR 2 criteria.

RESULTS

Fifty clinical studies and 13 systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) were included. Nineteen ARs were reported in 50 studies, including five knee-related ARs, seven common ARs, and seven other ARs. Some studies reported over 10% prevalence of knee pain (24.5%; 95% CI [14.7%, 35.7%]), knee effusion (12.5%; 95% CI [4.8%, 22.5%]), and knee swelling (11.9%; 95% CI [3.5%, 23.5%]). Additionally, two studies have reported cases of prostate cancer and breast tumors, respectively. However, these two studies suggest that stem cell therapy does not bring significant ARs to patients. SRs/MAs results revealed that stem cell therapy relieved pain in patients over time but did not improve knee function. However, current clinical studies have limited evidence regarding study objectives, test designs, and patient populations. Similarly, SRs/MAs have inadequate evidence regarding study design, risk of bias assessment, outcome description, comprehensive discussion, and potential conflicts of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

The inefficacy of stem cells, the risk of potential complications, and the limited quality of evidence from current studies precluded any recommendation for using stem cell products in patients with KOA. Clinical translation of stem cell therapies remains baseless and should be cautiously approached until more robust evidence is available. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022355875.

Knee Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Mesenchymal Stem Cells: What Else Is New? An Update

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease and the most common orthopedic disorder. A vast majority of the social OA burden is related to hips and knees. The prevalence of knee OA varied across studies and such differences are reflected by the heterogeneity of data reported by studies conducted worldwide. A complete understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this pathology is essential. The OA inflammatory process starts in the synovial membrane with the activation of the immune system, involving both humoral and cellular mediators. A crucial role in this process is played by the so-called “damage-associated molecular patterns” (DAMPs). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be a promising option among all possible therapeutic options. However, many issues are still debated, such as the best cell source, their nature, and the right amount. Further studies are needed to clarify the remaining doubts. This review provides an overview of the most recent and relevant data on the molecular mechanism of cartilage damage in knee OA, including current therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine.

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate versus Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Combined Cartilage Regeneration Procedure in Patients Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and objectives: Cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been attempted to improve articular cartilage regeneration in varus knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and human umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (hUCB-MSCs) have been reported to be effective. However, whether BMAC is superior to hUCB-MSCs remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of cartilage repair procedures with BMAC or hUCB-MSCs in patients undergoing HTO. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted using three global databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for studies in which the clinical outcomes after BMAC or hUCB-MSCs were used in patients undergoing HTO for varus knee OA. Data extraction, quality control, and meta-analysis were performed. To compare the clinical efficacy of BMAC and hUCB-MSCs, reported clinical outcome assessments and second-look arthroscopic findings were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The present review included seven studies of 499 patients who received either BMAC (BMAC group, n = 169) or hUCB-MSCs (hUCB-MSC group, n = 330). Improved clinical outcomes were found in both BMAC and hUCB-MSC groups; however, a significant difference was not observed between procedures (International Knee Documentation Committee score; p = 0.91, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index; p = 0.05, Knee Society Score (KSS) Pain; p = 0.85, KSS Function; p = 0.37). On second-look arthroscopy, the hUCB-MSC group showed better International Cartilage Repair Society Cartilage Repair Assessment grade compared with the BMAC group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both BMAC and hUCB-MSCs with HTO improved clinical outcomes in varus knee OA patients, and there was no difference in clinical outcomes between them. However, hUCB-MSCs were more effective in articular cartilage regeneration than BMAC augmentation.

Advances in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Osteoarthritis: From Preclinical and Clinical Perspectives

The prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative disorder of joints, has substantially increased in recent years. Its key pathogenic hallmarks include articular cartilage destruction, synovium inflammation, and bone remodeling. However, treatment outcomes are unsatisfactory. Until recently, common therapy methods, such as analgesic and anti-inflammatory treatments, were aimed to treat symptoms that cannot be radically cured. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), i.e., mesoderm non-hematopoietic cells separated from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood, etc., have been intensively explored as an emerging technique for the treatment of OA over the last few decades. According to existing research, MSCs may limit cartilage degradation in OA by interfering with cellular immunity and secreting a number of active chemicals. This study aimed to examine the potential mechanism of MSCs in the treatment of OA and conduct a thorough review of both preclinical and clinical data.

Comparative effectiveness of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder, is associated with an increasing socioeconomic impact owing to the ageing population.

AIM

To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) in knee OA management from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Independent and duplicate electronic database searches were performed, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until August 2021 for RCTs that analyzed the efficacy and safety of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs in the management of knee OA. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner score, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and adverse events were analyzed. Analysis was performed on the R-platform using OpenMeta (Analyst) software. Twenty-one studies, involving 936 patients, were included. Only one study compared the two MSC sources without patient randomization; hence, the results of all included studies from both sources were pooled, and a comparative critical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

At six months, both AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs showed significant VAS improvement (P = 0.015, P = 0.012); this was inconsistent at 1 year for BM-MSCs (P < 0.001, P = 0.539), and AD-MSCs outperformed BM-MSCs compared to controls in measures such as WOMAC (P < 0.001, P = 0.541), Lysholm scores (P = 0.006; P = 0.933), and KOOS (P = 0.002; P = 0.012). BM-MSC-related procedures caused significant adverse events (P = 0.003) compared to AD-MSCs (P = 0.673).

CONCLUSION

Adipose tissue is superior to bone marrow because of its safety and consistent efficacy in improving pain and functional outcomes. Future trials are urgently warranted to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the ideal source of MSCs for managing knee OA.

Allogeneic Umbilical Cord-Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Hyaluronate Composite Combined with High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis with Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects

Background and Objectives: Although the effects of cartilage repair in patients who are undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) remains controversial, cartilage repair may be required for the full-thickness cartilage defect because of a concern of lower clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcome and cartilage repair following implantation of allogeneic umbilical cord-blood-derived MSCs (UCB-MSCs)-hyaluronate composite in patients who received HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) with full-thickness cartilage defect. Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria were patients with a medial knee OA, a full-thickness cartilage defect (International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade IV) ≥  3 cm² of the medial femoral condyle, and a varus deformity  ≥  5°. The full-thickness cartilage defect was treated with implantation of an allogeneic UCB-MSCs-hyaluronate composite following medial open-wedge HTO. Visual analogue scale for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were assessed at each follow-up. Cartilage repair was assessed by the ICRS cartilage repair assessment system at second-look arthroscopy when the plate was removed. Results: Twelve patients (mean age 56.1 years; mean defect size: 4.5 cm²) were included, and 10 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy during plate removal after a minimum of 1 year after the HTO. At the final follow-up of mean 2.9 years (range; 1-6 years), all clinical outcomes had improved. At second-look arthroscopy, repaired tissue was observed in all cases. One case (10%) showed grade I, seven (70%) cases showed grade II, and two (20%) cases showed grade III according to ICRS cartilage repair assessment system, which meant that 80% showed an overall repair assessment of "normal" or "nearly normal". Conclusion: Allogeneic UCB-MSCs-HA composite implantation combined with HTO resulted in favorable clinical outcome and cartilage repair in all cases. These findings suggest that UCB-MSCs-HA composite implantation combined with HTO would be a good therapeutic option for patients with knee OA and full-thickness cartilage defects.

Intra-articular Injection of Bone Marrow Concentrate for Treatment of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis: Preliminary Results Utilizing an Ultrasound-Guided Marrow Harvesting Technique

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of intra-articular injection of bone marrow concentrate (BMC) under ultrasound (US) guidance in the treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA), with clinical and volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 96 consecutive patients referred for US-guided intra-articular injection of BMC for symptomatic patellofemoral OA for which conservative treatment had failed. A control group of 21 patients with symptomatic patellofemoral OA was included for comparison. Data on International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores as well as volumetric MR imaging (using T2 mapping sequence) were collected before and 12 months after injection, and the results were compared.

RESULTS

No technical adverse events were noted during bone marrow aspiration, BMC preparation, or intra-articular injection of BMC. No clinical adverse events were reported during long-term follow-up. All mean scores improved between baseline and 12 months after intra-articular injection of BMC (VAS 5.5 to 3.6, P < .0001; WOMAC 36.8 to 22.2, P < .0001; and IKDC 41.8 to 58.2, P < .0001). MR imaging at 1 year of follow-up after BMC treatment showed no statistically significant difference in hyaline cartilage volume compared with that at the baseline (P = .690), suggesting stabilization of the cartilage degradation process. In contrast, the group of untreated patients showed a significant decrease in the cartilage volume (P = .001), corresponding to a cartilage loss of 6.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that intra-articular injection of BMC under US guidance could be a promising option for the treatment of symptomatic patellofemoral OA and could promote the preservation of healthy residual cartilage volume.

Extracellular Vesicles and Cellular Ageing

Ageing is a complex process characterized by deteriorated performance at multiple levels, starting from cellular dysfunction to organ degeneration. Stem cell-based therapies aim to administrate stem cells that eventually migrate to the injured site to replenish the damaged tissue and recover tissue functionality. Stem cells can be easily obtained and cultured in vitro, and display several qualities such as self-renewal, differentiation, and immunomodulation that make them suitable candidates for stem cell-based therapies. Current animal studies and clinical trials are being performed to assess the safety and beneficial effects of stem cell engraftments for regenerative medicine in ageing and age-related diseases.Since alterations in cell-cell communication have been associated with the development of pathophysiological processes, new research is focusing on the modulation of the microenvironment. Recent research has highlighted the important role of some microenvironment components that modulate cell-cell communication, thus spreading signals from damaged ageing cells to neighbor healthy cells, thereby promoting systemic ageing. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small-rounded vesicles released by almost every cell type. EVs cargo includes several bioactive molecules, such as lipids, proteins, and genetic material. Once internalized by target cells, their specific cargo can induce epigenetic modifications and alter the fate of the recipient cells. Also, EV's content is dependent on the releasing cells, thus, EVs can be used as biomarkers for several diseases. Moreover, EVs have been proposed to be used as cell-free therapies that focus on their administration to slow or even reverse some hallmarks of physiological ageing. It is not surprising that EVs are also under study as next-generation therapies for age-related diseases.

Intra-Articular Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence

Knee osteoarthritis presents higher incidences than other joints, with increased prevalence during aging. It is a progressive process and may eventually lead to disability. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are expected to repair damaged issues due to trilineage potential, trophic effects, and immunomodulatory properties of MSCs. Intra-articular MSC injection was reported to treat knee osteoarthritis in many studies. This review focuses on several issues of intra-articular MSC injection for knee osteoarthritis, including doses of MSCs applied for injection and the possibility of cartilage regeneration following MSC injection. Intra-articular MSC injection induced hyaline-like cartilage regeneration, which could be seen by arthroscopy in several studies. Additionally, anatomical, biomechanical, and biochemical changes during aging and other causes participate in the development of knee osteoarthritis. Conversely, appropriate intervention based on these anatomical, biomechanical, biochemical, and functional properties and their interactions may postpone the progress of knee OA and facilitate cartilage repair induced by MSC injection. Hence, post-injection rehabilitation programs and related mechanisms are discussed.

Within or Without You? A Perspective Comparing In Situ and Ex Situ Tissue Engineering Strategies for Articular Cartilage Repair

Human articular cartilage has a poor ability to self-repair, meaning small injuries often lead to osteoarthritis, a painful and debilitating condition which is a major contributor to the global burden of disease. Existing clinical strategies generally do not regenerate hyaline type cartilage, motivating research toward tissue engineering solutions. Prospective cartilage tissue engineering therapies can be placed into two broad categories: i) Ex situ strategies, where cartilage tissue constructs are engineered in the lab prior to implantation and ii) in situ strategies, where cells and/or a bioscaffold are delivered to the defect site to stimulate chondral repair directly. While commonalities exist between these two approaches, the core point of distinction-whether chondrogenesis primarily occurs "within" or "without" (outside) the body-can dictate many aspects of the treatment. This difference influences decisions around cell selection, the biomaterials formulation and the surgical implantation procedure, the processes of tissue integration and maturation, as well as, the prospects for regulatory clearance and clinical translation. Here, ex situ and in situ cartilage engineering strategies are compared: Highlighting their respective challenges, opportunities, and prospects on their translational pathways toward long term human cartilage repair.

PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Osteoarthritis of Knee Managed with Allogeneic vs Autologous MSCs: Efficacy and Safety Analysis

Study Design

Meta-analysis.

Objectives

Our objective is to review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted previously on the topic of osteoarthritis of the knee to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of autologous and allogeneic sources of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods

We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until August 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing the efficacy and safety of autologous and allogeneic sources of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. These searches were conducted independently and in duplicate. The outcomes that were taken into consideration for analysis were the visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Lysholm score, and adverse events. The OpenMeta [Analyst] software was utilised to carry out the analysis in the R platform.

Results

In total, 21 studies with a total of 936 patients were considered for this analysis. Because none of the studies made a direct comparison of the autologous and allogeneic sources of MSCs, we pooled the results of all of the included studies of both sources and made a comparative analysis of how the two types of MSCs fared in their respective applications. Although both allogeneic and autologous sources of MSCs demonstrated significantly better VAS improvement after 6 months (p = 0.006, p = 0.001), this trend was not maintained after 1 year for the allogeneic source (p = 0.171, p = 0.027). When compared to their respective controls based on WOMAC scores after 1 year, autologous sources (p = 0.016) of MSCs performed better than allogeneic sources (p = 0.186).A similar response was noted between the sources at 2 years in their Lysholm scores (p = 0.682, p = 0.017), respectively. Moreover, allogeneic sources (p = 0.039) of MSCs produced significant adverse events than autologous sources (p = 0.556) compared to their controls.

Conclusion

Our analysis of literature showed that autologous sources of MSCs stand superior to allogeneic sources of MSC with regard to their consistent efficacy for pain, functional outcomes, and safety. However, we strongly recommend that further studies be conducted that are of a high enough quality to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the best source of MSCs for use in cellular therapy treatments for knee osteoarthritis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00751-z.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 28 Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Chinese databases (such as CNKI and SinoMed) and English databases (such as PubMed and Embase) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MSCs in the treatment of OA. The retrieval time is from inception to October 10, 2021. The literature was strictly selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data was extracted, and the quality was evaluated. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. STATA was used to evaluate publication bias. The registration number of this systematic review and meta-analysis is CRD42021277145.

Results

A total of 28 RCTs involving 1494 participants were included. The primary outcomes showed that MSCs may reduce WOMAC pain and VAS at the 3rd-month follow-up [WOMAC pain: -3.81 (-6.95, -0.68), P = 0.02. VAS: -1.11 (-1.53, -0.68), P < 0.00001], and the effect lasts for at least 12 months [WOMAC pain: -4.29 (-7.12, -1.47), P = 0.003. VAS: -1.77 (-2.43, -1.12), P < 0.00001]. MSCs may also reduce WOMAC stiffness and physical function at the 6th-month follow-up [WOMAC stiffness: -1.12 (-2.09, -0.14), P = 0.03. WOMAC physical function: -4.40 (-6.84, -1.96), P = 0.0004], and the effect lasts for at least 12 months [WOMAC stiffness: -0.99 (-1.95, -0.03), P = 0.04. WOMAC physical function: -3.26 (-5.91, -0.61), P = 0.02]. The improvement of WOMAC pain, VAS, WOMAC stiffness, and WOMAC physical function may be clinically significant. Meanwhile, after the MSC injection, Lequesne had been reduced compared with the control group [-4.49 (-8.21, -0.77), P = 0.002]. For adverse events, there is no significant difference in the safety of MSC injection and the control group [1.20 (0.97, 1.48), P = 0.09]. The quality of WOMAC physical function and adverse events were moderate.

Conclusion

Based on current evidence, MSCs may be a safety therapy that have a good curative effect in the treatment of OA, the onset time is no later than 3 months, and the time to maintain the curative effect is no less than 12 months. However, these results should be generalized with caution due to the generally low quality of evidence and RCTs.

New insight into the current study of high tibial osteotomy: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

To analyze global trends in focus and funding of research related to high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and to identify the 100 most cited articles in this field.

METHODS

A Web of Science search was used to identify HTO publications in English-language scientific journals from January 1967 till February 3th, 2021. Results were filtered to the 100 most cited articles by reading the abstract or full-text paper. Information of these articles was recorded for further analysis. The 10 top-cited articles during the last 5 years and the 10 top-cited articles about HTO ranked by average citations per year were selected to predict research trends.

RESULTS

In all, 48 out of the 100 top-cited articles were published between 2000 and 2010. The United States of America was the primary contributor (n = 29) followed by Germany (n = 17) and Japan (n = 11). The total number of citations per article ranged from 65 to 563, median 108, mean 135 (standard deviation = 84). The American Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery accounted for 23 out of the 100 top-cited articles. Koshino T was the most cited author (603 citations). The most frequently highlighted study theme was prognostic research. Patient-based clinical research was the dominant study design (85%). The majority of articles (48 out of 100) were level IV evidence with a mean of 141 (standard deviation = 97) citations. Top-cited articles in the last 5 years focused on open wedge osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

Technical optimization of open wedge osteotomy has emerged as the main area of research in HTO. More specifically, recent publications focus on the surgical technology, cartilage repair and new fixation devices. Besides, papers with a high level of evidence are needed for the development of HTO.

Current Trends in Orthobiologics: An 11-Year Review of the Orthopaedic Literature

BACKGROUND

The use of "orthobiologics" or regenerative therapies in orthopaedic surgery has grown in recent years. Particular interest has been raised with regard to platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate, adipose-derived cells, and amniotic cells. Although studies have analyzed outcomes after orthobiologic treatment, no study has analyzed how the literature as a whole has evolved.

PURPOSE

To evaluate trends in platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate, adipose-derived cells, and amniotic cell publications and to assess how these might inform efforts to establish minimum reporting standards and forecast future use.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A database was compiled systematically using PubMed to identify articles published between 2009 and 2019 within 9 prominent orthopaedic journals and pertaining to the use of platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate, adipose-derived cells, and amniotic cells in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. Included articles were classified as clinical, nonclinical (translational or basic science), or review, and a variety of study parameters were recorded for each. Additional queries were performed to identify articles that utilized minimum reporting standards.

RESULTS

A total of 474 articles (132 clinical, 271 nonclinical, 71 review) were included, consisting of 244 (51.5%) platelet-rich plasma, 146 (30.8%) bone marrow aspirate, 72 (15.2%) adipose-derived cells, and 12 (2.5%) amniotic cells. The greatest annual increase in publications for each orthobiologic topic was from 2018 to 2019. The American Journal of Sports Medicine demonstrated the highest number of overall (34.2%) and clinical (50.0%) publications, and accounted for 44.3% of all platelet-rich plasma publications. The Journal of Orthopaedic Research accounted for the second highest overall number of publications (24.9%) and highest nonclinical publications (41.0%). Platelet-rich plasma accounted for 91.5% of all level 1 clinical studies, while much greater than half of bone marrow aspirate, adipose-derived cells, and amniotic cell publications were level 3 or lower. Out of the 207 articles that used some form of reporting protocol, 59 (28.5%) used an established algorithm and 125 (60.4%) used their own.

CONCLUSION

Interest in orthobiologics continues to grow, as evidenced by an increasing trend in publications over an 11-year period. However, current reporting on orthobiologic formulations is largely heterogeneous, emphasizing the need for minimum reporting standards and higher-quality studies.

Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcomes After Microfracture Treatment With and Without Augmentation for Focal Chondral Lesions in the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Focal cartilage lesions represent a common source of knee pain and disability, with the potential for the development and progression of osteoarthritis. Currently, microfracture (MFx) represents the most utilized first-line surgical treatment for small, focal chondral lesions. Recent investigations have examined methods of overcoming the limitations of MFx utilizing various augmentation techniques.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing isolated MFx versus MFx augmented with orthobiologics or scaffolds for focal chondral defects of the knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify studies evaluating outcomes and adverse events in patients undergoing isolated MFx versus augmented MFx for focal chondral defects in the knee from 1945 to June 1, 2021. Data were extracted from each article that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes reported in a minimum of 3 studies.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were identified, utilizing 7 different types of injectable augmentation regimens and 5 different scaffolding regimens. Across the 14 studies, a total of 744 patients were included. The mean patient age was 46.8 years (range, 34-58 years), and 58.3% (n = 434/744) of patients were women. The mean final follow-up time was 26.7 months (range, 12-60 months). The mean chondral defect size ranged from 1.3 to 4.8 cm². A post hoc analysis comparing mean improvement in postoperative outcomes scores compared with preoperative values found no significant differences in the improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores between patients undergoing isolated MFx and those undergoing MFx + augmentation. Patients undergoing MFx + augmentation reported significantly greater improvements in the Lysholm score and postoperative MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) scores compared with the isolated MFx group.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing combined MFx + augmentation reported significant improvements in mean Lysholm and MOCART scores, without significant improvements in VAS, IKDC, or WOMAC scores when compared with patients undergoing isolated MFx.

Short-term results of intra-articular injections of stromal vascular fraction for early knee osteoarthritis

Background

In knee osteoarthritis, progressive degeneration of the articular cartilage surface produces disability and chronic pain. Intra-articular injections of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) could be an innovative approach to manage patients with early knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Between June 2019 and November 2020, 123 patients were recruited to receive intra-articular injection of SVF. Radiographic evidence of degenerative joint disease was classified according to Kellgren and Lawrence grades. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were collected preoperatively, at 1 month, and after 6 months from injection.

Results

There was a statistically significant improvement of KOOS and VAS of all patients to 6 months (p < 0.05). The mean KOOS before injection was 51.4 ± 16.5, after 1 month it was 75.5 ± 15.8, and at 6 months it was 87.6 ± 7.7. Stratifying the mean KOOS according to Kellgren–Lawrence Grades, the difference remained statistically significant (p < 0.05). The patients’ mean VAS before injection was 6.5, after 1 month it was 3.5, and after 6 months it was 2.4. No complications were observed.

Conclusions

Intra-articular knee injection of SVF is safe and effective to ameliorate the clinical and functional scores in patients with early knee osteoarthritis for 6 months.

Intra-articular Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells After High Tibial Osteotomy in Osteoarthritic Knee: Two-Year Follow-up of Randomized Control Trial

Intra-articular injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) would be a promising disease-modifying treatment by correcting biomechanical and biochemical environment for arthritic knee with varus malalignment. However, there is a paucity of clinical evidence of the treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was aimed to assess regeneration of cartilage defect, functional improvement, and safety of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs after MOWHTO compared with MOWHTO alone for osteoarthritic knee with varus malalignment. This RCT allocated 26 patients into the MOWHTO with ADMSC-injection group (n = 13) and control (MOWHTO-alone) group (n = 13). The primary outcome was the serial changes of cartilage defect on periodic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation using valid measurements until postoperative 24 months. Secondary outcomes were the 2-stage arthroscopic evaluation for macroscopic cartilage status and the postoperative functional improvements of patient-reported outcome measures until the latest follow-up. Furthermore, safety profiles after the treatment were evaluated. Cartilage regeneration on serial MRIs showed significantly better in the ADMSC group than in the control group. The arthroscopic assessment revealed that total cartilage regeneration was significantly better in the ADMSC group. Although it was not significant, functional improvements after the treatment showed a tendency to be greater in the ADMSC group than in the control group from 18 months after the treatment. No treatment-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and postoperative complications occurred in all cases. Concomitant intra-articular injection of ADMSCs with MOWHTO had advantages over MOWHTO alone in terms of cartilage regeneration with safety at 2-year follow-up, suggesting potential disease-modifying treatment for knee OA with varus malalignment.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Osteoarthritis: Evidence for Structural Benefit and Cartilage Repair

Osteoarthritis (OA) presents a major clinical challenge to rheumatologists and orthopedists due to the lack of available drugs reducing structural degradation. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may represent new therapeutic approaches in cartilage regeneration. In this review, we highlight the latest knowledge on the biological properties of MSC, such as their chondrogenic and immunomodulatory potential, and we give a brief overview of the effects of MSCs in preclinical and clinical studies of OA treatment and also compare different MSC sources, with the adipose tissue-derived MSCs being promising. Then, we focus on their structural benefit in treating OA and summarize the current evidence for the assessment of cartilage in OA according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and second-look arthroscopy after MSC therapy. Finally, this review provides a brief perspective on enhancing the activity of MSCs.

Injectable cultured bone marrow derived mesenchymal cells vs chondrocytes in the treatment of chondral defects of the knee - RCT with 6 years follow-up

Articular cartilage has unique biological and biomechanical characteristics. Damage to this tissue fails to heal spontaneously, leading to progressive arthritis. Cartilage repair techniques have been looked forward to in the treatment of significant cartilage injuries. Cell-based regenerative techniques like the two-staged cultured chondrocytes and single-stage mesenchymal cell transplantation have been tried with varying results and limitations. We study the outcomes of cultured bone marrow derived MSCs in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in comparison to autologous cultured chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Both cultured MSC and ACI treatment methods resulted in significant improvements in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). There was no difference in the PROMs, MOCART scores, T2∗ mapping and dGEMRIC values between the groups. Use of cultured MSCs leads to good clinical outcomes similar to ACI and represents a promising treatment to restore the articular cartilage in the knee.

Methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on stem cells for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey

Clinical guidelines need high-quality studies to support clinical decision-making, in which the evidence often was collected from systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyses (MAs). At present, the methodological quality and risk of bias (RoB) of SRs/MAs on stem cell therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) has been poorly investigated. This study aims to strictly evaluate the methodological quality and RoB in SRs/MAs of stem cell therapy for KOA. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases) were searched, from inception to October 5th, 2021. SRs/MAs involving randomized control trials (RCTs) or cohort studies on stem cell therapy for the treatment of KOA were included. The methodological quality and RoB were assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tool respectively. In total, 22 SRs/MAs were included. According to the results obtained by AMSTAR 2 tool, all SRs/MAs were rated as "Critically low". Main methodological weaknesses were as follows: up to 81.82% did not meet protocol registration requirements, only 13.64% provided a list of excluded studies and justification, and 13.64% investigated and discussed the publication bias.. ROBIS-based RoB assessment showed that all the SRs/MAs were rated as "High". Besides, the lack of following the implementation of the PRISMA reporting guideline seems to reduce the methodological quality of the studies. The overall methodological quality of the SRs/MAs concerning the application of stem cell therapy in treating KOA is "Critically low", while the RoB is high. It is difficult to provide effective evidence for the formulation of guidelines for KOA treatment. We suggest that the relevant methodological quality assessment should be carried out in the future before the SRs/MAs are used as clinical evidence. In addition, it may be necessary for many journals to include the checklist with a submitted manuscript.

Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Promote Functional Osteochondral Repair in a Clinically Relevant Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported the efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) exosomes for the repair of osteochondral defects in rats and rabbits. However, the safety and efficacy of MSC exosomes remain to be validated in a clinically relevant large animal model.

PURPOSE

To validate the safety and efficacy of human MSC exosomes for osteochondral repair in a clinically relevant micropig model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Bilateral osteochondral defects (6-mm diameter and 1-mm depth) were surgically created in the medial femoral condyles in knees of 12 micropigs. The pigs then received 2-mL intra-articular injections of MSC exosomes and hyaluronic acid (HA) (Exosome+HA) or HA alone after surgery and thereafter at 8 and 15 days. Osteochondral repair was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 15 days and at 2 and 4 months after surgery as well as by macroscopic, histological, biomechanical, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analyses at 4 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Exosome+HA-treated defects demonstrated significantly better MRI scores than HA-treated defects at 15 days and at 2 and 4 months. Additionally, Exosome+HA-treated defects demonstrated functional cartilage and subchondral bone repair, with significantly better macroscopic and histological scores and biomechanical properties (Young modulus and stiffness) than HA-treated defects at 4 months. Micro-CT further showed significantly higher bone volume and trabecular thickness in the subchondral bone of Exosome+HA-treated defects than that of HA-treated defects. Importantly, no adverse response or major systemic alteration was observed in any of the animals.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the combination of MSC exosomes and HA administered at a clinically acceptable frequency of 3 weekly intra-articular injections can promote functional cartilage and subchondral bone repair, with significantly improved morphological, histological, and biomechanical outcomes in a clinically relevant porcine model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings provide a robust scientific rationale to support a phase 1/2 clinical trial to test MSC exosomes in patients with osteochondral lesions.

What is the clinically significant ideal mesenchymal stromal cell count in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee? - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to identify the clinically significant ideal Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) count in the management of osteoarthritis of knee from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) available in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library till August 2021 for RCTs conducted in the management of knee osteoarthritis using MSC therapy specifying the quantity of MSCs delivered. We categorized the studies based on the MSC count utilized in them into four groups namely <1 × 10⁷ MSCs (Group I), 1-5x10⁷ MSCs (Group II), 5-10 × 10⁷ MSCs (Group III), and >10 × 10⁷ MSCs (Group IV). Visual Analog Score (VAS) for Pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and adverse events were the outcomes analyzed. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta [Analyst] software.

RESULTS

14 studies involving 564 patients were included for analysis. We noted incremental decrease in the VAS with increasing dosage of MSCs at 12 months [Group I,WMD = 2.641(p = 0.854); Group II, WMD = -4.853(p = 0.379); Group III, WMD = -12.154 (p = 0.316); Group IV, WMD = -15.935(p = 0.116)], and 24 months [Group I,WMD = -6(p = 0.001); Group II, WMD = -15(p = 0.001); Group IV, WMD = -20(p = 0.001)]. We also noted incremental improvement in the WOMAC, KOOS with increasing dosage of MSCs at 12 months [Group I, WMD = 7(p = 0.001); Group II, WMD = 28(p = 0.001); Group IV, WMD = 30(p = 0.001)] and [Group II, WMD = -2.562(p = 0.676); Group III, WMD = 7.670(p = 0.099); Group IV, WMD = 13.475(p = 0.261)] respectively. However, we noted significant reduction in the Lysholm score in Group IV, compared to the others at 12 months (WMD = -12.5, 95%CI[-25.883,0.883]) and 24 months (WMD = -6.6, 95%CI[-23.596,10.396]). We did not find any significant increase in the adverse events with incremental dosage of MSCs in any of the groups compared.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the four dosage groups of MSCs analyzed, Group III showed consistent significant improvement in pain and functional outcomes analyzed compared to the other groups. Hence, we recommend a cell volume of 5-10 × 10⁷ cells to be delivered to the target site to obtain superior benefits out of the procedure. However, we urge future trials of sufficient quality to validate our findings to arrive at a consensus on the ideal count of MSCs to be delivered in the cellular therapy for knee osteoarthritis.

Does vehicle-based delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells give superior results in knee osteoarthritis? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) available in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library till August 2021 for RCTs analyzing the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Visual Analog Score (VAS) for Pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, and adverse events were the outcomes analyzed. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta [Analyst] software.

RESULTS

21 studies involving 936 patients were included for analysis. None of the studies made a direct comparison of the direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs, hence we pooled the results of all the included studies of both groups and made a comparative analysis of their outcomes. Although at 6 months, both direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs showed significantly better VAS improvement (p = 0.002, p = 0.010), it was not consistent at 1 year for the vehicle delivery (p = 0.973). During 6 months and 12 months, direct delivery of MSCs (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) outperformed vehicle delivery (p = 0.969, p = 0.922) compared to their control based on WOMAC scores respectively. Both direct (p = 0.713) and vehicle-based delivery (p = 0.123) of MSCs did not produce significant adverse events compared to their controls.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of literature showed that current clinically employed methods of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs such as platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid did not demonstrate superior results compared to direct delivery, concerning the efficacy of treatment measured by improvement in pain, functional outcomes, and safety. Hence, we urge future clinical trials to be conducted to validate the effectiveness of advanced delivery vehicles such as composite bioscaffolds to establish their practical utility in cartilage regeneration with respect to its encouraging in-vitro evidence.

Knee intra-articular administration of stromal vascular fraction obtained from adipose tissue: A systematic review

Osteoarthritis is a debilitating chronic degenerative disease of cartilage joint surfaces and the knee is the weight-bearing joint most frequently plagued. Intra-articular cell therapies have recently emerged as a method to manage knee osteoarthritis. A literature search identifying all articles involving use of SVF to treat knee osteoarthritis was performed, consulting several databases. In conclusion, 24 clinical trials analysed report good to excellent clinical and radiographic results for the treatment of knee OA with the use of intraarticular administration of SVF.

Is Culture Expansion Necessary in Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy to Obtain Superior Results in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis?-Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Study Design: Meta-analysis. Objectives: We aimed to analyze the impact of cultured expansion of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) available in the literature. Materials and Methods: We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until August 2021 for RCTs analyzing the efficacy and safety of culture-expanded compared to non-cultured autologous MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. The Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain, Western Ontario McMaster University's Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and adverse events were the analyzed outcomes. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta [Analyst] software. Results: Overall, 17 studies involving 767 patients were included for analysis. None of the studies made a direct comparison of the culture expanded and non-cultured MSCs, hence we pooled the results of all the included studies of non-cultured and cultured types of MSC sources and made a comparative analysis of the outcomes. At six months, culture expanded MSCs showed significantly better improvement (p < 0.001) in VAS outcome. Uncultured MSCs, on the other hand, demonstrated significant VAS improvement in the long term (12 months) in VAS (p < 0.001), WOMAC (p = 0.025), KOOS score (p = 0.016) where cultured-expanded MSCs failed to demonstrate a significant change. Culturing of MSCs did not significantly increase the complications noted (p = 0.485). On sub-group analysis, adipose-derived uncultured MSCs outperformed culture-expanded MSCs at both short term (six months) and long term (12 months) in functional outcome parameters such as WOMAC (p < 0.001, p = 0.025), Lysholm (p < 0.006), and KOOS (p < 0.003) scores, respectively, compared to their controls. Conclusions: We identified a void in literature evaluating the impact of culture expansion of MSCs for use in knee osteoarthritis. Our indirect analysis of literature showed that culture expansion of autologous MSCs is not a necessary factor to obtain superior results in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, while using uncultured autologous MSCs, we recommend MSCs of adipose origin to obtain superior functional outcomes. However, we urge future trials of sufficient quality to validate our findings to arrive at a consensus on the need for culture expansion of MSCs for use in cellular therapy of knee osteoarthritis.

Method Categorization of Stem Cell Therapy for Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Review

Current clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for osteoarthritis lack consistency because there are no established criteria for clinical processes. We aimed to systematically organize stem cell treatment methods by reviewing the literature. The treatment methods used in 27 clinical trials were examined and reviewed. The clinical processes were separated into seven categories: cell donor, cell source, cell preparation, delivery methods, lesion preparation, concomitant procedures, and evaluation. Stem cell donors were sub-classified as autologous and allogeneic, and stem cell sources included bone marrow, adipose tissue, peripheral blood, synovium, placenta, and umbilical cord. Mesenchymal stem cells can be prepared by the expansion or isolation process and attached directly to cartilage defects using matrices or injected into joints under arthroscopic observation. The lesion preparation category can be divided into three subcategories: chondroplasty, microfracture, and subchondral drilling. The concomitant procedure category describes adjuvant surgery, such as high tibial osteotomy. Classification codes were assigned for each subcategory to provide a useful and convenient method for organizing documents associated with stem cell treatment. This classification system will help researchers choose more unified treatment methods, which will facilitate the efficient comparison and verification of future clinical outcomes of stem cell therapy for osteoarthritis.

All-Cause Failure Rates Increase With Time Following Meniscal Repair Despite Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to perform a meta-analysis of studies reporting meniscus repair outcomes. Pooled analyses of such studies will provide an accurate estimate of the outcomes that can be expected following meniscal repair at various postoperative time points.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of meniscal repair failure (defined as persistent symptoms, lack of healing on magnetic resonance imaging or revision surgery) and other clinical outcomes was performed following meniscal repair. Patients included had traumatic, nondegenerative meniscal tears, were skeletally mature, and had specific time-points after surgery. Repairs included were performed either in isolation, or with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Because of the inherent heterogeneity of single-arm meta-analyses, pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Rates of all-cause meniscal repair failure was pooled to be 12% at 0-1 years (95% CI: .09-.16), 15% at 2-3 years (95% CI: .11-.20), and 19% at 4-6 years (95% CI: .13-.24). Sensitivity analysis for studies performing meniscal repair entirely on patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) showed comparable rates of failure at similar time intervals. Development of osteoarthritis, in patients with knees previously free from articular pathologies, was 4% at 2-3 years (95% CI: .02-.07), and 10% at 4-6 years (95% CI: .03-.25).

CONCLUSION

Meniscus repair for traumatic injuries have an all-cause failure rate that increases from 12% to 19% through a time period ranging from 1-6 years following surgery. The failure rates were comparable for patients with meniscal repairs performed with concomitant ACLRs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic Review of Level II-IV Studies.