Effect of body mass index on patients with multiligamentous knee injuries

Frailty is a predictor of immediate postoperative complications following surgical management of knee dislocations

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of frailty in predicting outcomes following surgical intervention for KDs.

METHODS

The NIS database was queried for non-congenital knee dislocations from 2015 to 2019 that underwent ligament repair or surgical reduction. Patients were assigned frailty scores using the mFI-11, and outcomes were compared. Multivariate regression and ROC curve analysis were used to assess the independent association of obesity, frailty, VI, and age with adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 3797 patients who underwent surgical management were included. Frailty was associated with extended LOS (OR 1.353, 95% CI 1.212-1.510, p < 0.001), adverse discharge (OR 1.716, 95% CI 1.515-1.946, p < 0.001), and complications (OR 1.449, 95% CI 1.352-1.553, p < 0.001). Severely frailty was associated with extended LOS (OR 1.838, 95% CI 1.611-2.097, p < 0.001), adverse discharge (OR 2.756, 95% CI 2.394-3.171, p < 0.001), and complications (OR 1.603, 95% CI 1.453-1.768, p < 0.001). Additionally, VI was a risk factor for extended LOS (OR 7.647 (6.442-9.076) p < 0.001), complications (OR 2.065 (1.810-2.341) p < 0.001), and adverse discharge (OR 1.825 (1.606-2.075), p < 0.001). Obesity was a risk factor for extended LOS (OR 1.599 (1.470-1.739), p < 0.001) and complications (OR 1.235 (1.108-1.377), p < 0.001). AUC analysis showed that frailty was the most accurate predictor of all outcomes when compared to VI, obesity, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is superior to age and obesity, and comparable to VI, at predicting adverse outcomes following surgical management of KDs. These findings suggest that frailty assessment might play a role in risk stratification and preoperative planning for KD patients that require surgical intervention.

Increased Body Mass Index is Associated with Worse Mid- To Long-Term Patient Outcomes after Surgical Repair of Multiligamentous Knee Injuries

We evaluated the relationship between elevated body mass index (BMI) and mid- to long-term outcomes after surgical treatment of multiligamentous knee injury (MLKI). Records identified patients treated surgically for MLKI at a single institution. Inclusion criteria: minimum 2 years since surgery, complete demographics, surgical data, sustained injuries to two or more ligaments in one or both knees, and available for follow-up. Patients were contacted to complete patient-reported outcomes assessments and were classified according to mechanism of injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the impact of BMI on outcome scores. A total of 77 patients (72.7% male) were included with a mean age at the time of injury of 29.4 ± 11.0 years and a mean BMI of 30.5 ± 9.4 kg/m2. The mean length of follow-up was 7.4 years. For each 10 kg/m2 increase in BMI, there is a 0.9-point decrease in Tegner activity scale (p = 0.001), a 5-point decrease in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain (p = 0.007), a 5-point decrease in KOOS-ADL (p = 0.003), a 10-point decrease in KOOS-QOL (p = 0.002), and an 11-point decrease in KOOS-Sport (p = 0.002). There were no significant correlations with BMI and Pain Catastrophizing Scale or Patient Health Questionnaire scores. Increasing BMI has a negative linear relationship with mid- to long-term clinical outcomes including pain, ability to perform activities of daily living, quality of life, and ability to perform more demanding physical activity after MLKI. BMI does not appear to have a significant relationship with knee swelling and mechanical symptoms or patients' mental health.

Outcomes after Anatomic Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Transtibial and Tibial Inlay Techniques

Surgical reconstruction is recommended for symptomatic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency. While anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) has been reported to be associated with biomechanical and clinical advantages over other methods, there is still debate regarding the optimal technique for tibial positioning and fixation. Based on reported advantages and disadvantages, we employed two tibial fixation techniques, transtibial (TT) and tibial inlay (TI) for anatomic double-bundle PCLR with technique selection based on body mass index, comorbidities, and primary versus revision surgery. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following PCLR utilizing either TT or TI techniques to validate relative advantages, disadvantages, and indications for each based on the review of prospectively collected registry data. For 37 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 26 underwent arthroscopic TT PCLR using all-soft- tissue allograft with suspensory fixation in the tibia and 11 patients underwent open TI PCLR using an allograft with calcaneal bone block and screw fixation in the tibia. There were no significant preoperative differences between cohorts. Success rates were 96% for TT and 91% for TI with all successful cases documented to be associated with good-to-excellent posterior stability and range of motion in the knee at the final follow-up. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores were within clinically meaningful ranges for pain, function, and mental health after PCLR in both cohorts, suggesting similarly favorable functional, social, and psychological outcomes. Patient-reported pain scores at 6 months postoperatively were significantly (p = 0.042) lower in the TT cohort, which was the only statistically significant difference in outcomes noted. The results of this study support the use of TT and TI techniques for double-bundle anatomic PCLR in restoring knee stability and patient function when used for the treatment of isolated and multiligamentous PCL injuries. The choice between tibial fixation methods for PCLR can be appropriately based on patient and injury characteristics that optimize respective advantages for each technique.

Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes After Quadriceps Tendon Repair

Background

Ruptures of the quadriceps tendon present most frequently in older adults and individuals with underlying medical conditions.

Purpose

To examine the relationship between patient-specific factors and tear characteristics with outcomes after quadriceps tendon repair.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent quadriceps tendon repair between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2021, at a single institution. Patients <18 years and those with chronic quadriceps tendon tears (>6 weeks to surgery) were excluded. Information was collected regarding patient characteristics, presenting symptoms, tear characteristics, physical examination findings, and postoperative outcomes. Poor outcome was defined as a need for revision surgery, complications, postoperative range of motion of (ROM) <110° of knee flexion, and extensor lag of >5°.

Results

A total of 191 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were aged 58.5 ± 13.2 years at the time of surgery, were predominantly men (90.6%), and had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 32.2 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Patients underwent repair with either suture anchors (15.2%) or transosseous tunnels (84.8%). Postoperatively, 18.5% of patients experienced knee flexion ROM of <110°, 11.3% experienced extensor lag of >5°, 8.5% had complications, and 3.2% underwent revision. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 1.004-1.07]) and female sex (OR, 3.82 [95% CI, 1.25-11.28]) were significantly associated with postoperative knee flexion of <110°, and increasing age (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]) and greater BMI (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]) were significantly associated with postoperative extensor lag of >5°. Current smoking status (OR, 15.44 [95% CI, 3.97-65.90]) and concomitant retinacular tears (OR, 9.62 (95% CI, 1.67-184.14]) were associated with postoperative complications, and increasing age (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.08]) and greater BMI (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.14]) were associated with risk of acquiring any poor outcome criteria.

Conclusion

Patient-specific characteristics-such as increasing age, greater BMI, female sex, retinacular involvement, and current smoking status-were found to be risk factors for poor outcomes after quadriceps tendon repair. Further studies are needed to identify potentially modifiable risk factors that can be used to set patient expectations and improve outcomes.

Differences in Trampoline-Related Knee Injuries Between Children and Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Little is known about the specific risk of knee injuries due to trampoline accidents in adults compared with children.

Purpose

To investigate the differences in trampoline-related knee injuries between children and adults and identify risk factors and protective strategies to reduce injury incidence.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Data on 229 consecutive patients treated for trampoline-related knee injuries in a single institution were prospectively collected, analyzed, and included. Risk factors, injury patterns, and clinical treatments were compared between skeletally immature and skeletally mature patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios for specific risk factors for trampoline-related injuries-including body mass index (BMI), trauma mechanism, patient age, and accident location.

Results

A total of 229 patients met the inclusion criteria; 118 (52%) patients (women, 54.2%; mean age, 8.5 ± 4.1 years) were skeletally immature at the time of injury, and 111 (48%) patients (women, 72%; mean age, 31.9 ± 13.1 years) had closed physes on initial presentation and were classified as skeletally mature. A total of 63 patients (28%) required surgical treatment for their knee injury. Overall, 50 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, 46 fractures, 39 meniscal tears, 31 ligamentous tears other than ACL, 22 patellar dislocations, and 38 soft tissue injuries, such as lacerations, were recorded. Skeletally mature patients had 7.8 times higher odds (95% CI, 1.6-46.8; P < .05) and 19.1 increased odds (95% CI, 5.5-74.9; P < .05) of an ACL tear or another ligamentous tear, respectively, compared with skeletally immature patients. Patients who described instability and giving way of the knee as relevant trauma mechanisms had odds of 3.11 (95% CI, 0.9-14.8; P < .05) of an ACL tear compared with other trauma mechanisms. Meniscal tears were observed more frequently in the skeletally mature cohort (P < .05). An elevated BMI was associated with a significantly higher relative risk of an ACL tear, a ligamentous tear other than the ACL, and an injury requiring surgery. A third of surgically treated patients were subject to a delayed diagnosis.

Conclusion

Adults had a significantly increased risk of ligamentous and meniscal tears and required operative intervention more often than skeletally immature individuals. Elevated BMI, age, and instability events in terms of trauma mechanism conveyed an increased risk of structural damage to the knee.

Early surgery and number of injured ligaments are associated with postoperative stiffness following multi-ligament knee injury surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the rate of stiffness after multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) surgery and identify potential risk factors associated with postoperative stiffness.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. Registration was done on the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022321849). A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in October 2022 for clinical studies reporting postoperative stiffness after MLKI surgery. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) grading system. The following variables were extracted from studies for correlation to postoperative stiffness: study characteristics, cohort demographics, Schenk classification, neurovascular injury, mechanism of injury, external fixator placement, timing of surgery, and concomitant knee injuries.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprising 4,159 patients who underwent MLKI surgery met the inclusion criteria, including two Level-II, fourteen Level-III, and twenty Level-IV studies. The average MINOR score of the studies was 14. The stiffness rate after MLKI was found to be 9.8% (95% CI 0.07-0.13; p < 0.01; I2 = 87%), and the risk of postoperative stiffness was significantly lower for patients with two ligaments injured compared to patients with ≥ 3 ligaments injured (OR = 0.45, 95% CI (0.26-0.79), p = 0.005; I2 = 0%). The results of the pooled analysis showed early surgery (< 3 weeks) resulted in significantly increased odds of postoperative stiffness compared with delayed surgery (≥ 3 weeks) (OR = 2.18; 95% CI 1.11-4.25; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). However, age, gender, body mass index, energy of injury, and neurovascular injury were not associated with an increased risk of postoperative stiffness (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Performing surgery within the first 3 weeks following MLKI, or concomitant injury of ≥ 3 ligaments, are significantly associated with increased risk of postoperative stiffness. These findings can be utilized by surgeons to decide the timing of surgery for MLKI surgeries especially in which ≥ 3 ligaments are injured.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Does Delayed Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Lead to Poor Outcomes in Patients With Multiligament Knee Injuries?

Background and objective Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are difficult to treat, and poor outcomes have been reported after conservative management. Controversy exists as to how to surgically manage these complex injuries. The aim of our study was to evaluate the midterm patient-reported outcomes after delayed multiligament knee reconstruction. Methods This was a review of a prospectively kept database of all patients undergoing surgery for multiligament reconstruction at a single institution. A total of 51 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up of 48 months. In addition to the patient-reported outcomes, we also looked at other factors that could potentially affect the outcomes. Results At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between the range of motion (ROM) of the injured knee compared to that of the healthy knee. Patients having surgery >6 months after injury had similar outcomes when compared to those having surgery <6 months post-injury. Female patients and patients with a BMI >30 had inferior outcomes. Conclusion Good midterm results can be expected after delayed multiligament knee reconstruction. Patients with a BMI >30 and female patients were observed to have inferior outcomes.

Different patient and activity-related characteristics result in different injury profiles for patients with anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament injuries

PURPOSE

To compare patient characteristics including patient sex, age, body mass index (BMI), activities at the time of injury and injury profiles in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry. Two study groups were created: (1) index ACL reconstruction (ACL group) and (2) index PCL reconstruction (PCL group). Between-group differences were investigated using Fisher's exact test and Fisher's non-parametric permutation test for dichotomous variables and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 39,010 patients, 38,904 were ACL injuries. A larger proportion of patients with combined injuries to the PCL, meniscus and cartilage were female, aged > 25 years and with a BMI of > 35 kg/m² compared with patients with combined injuries to the ACL, meniscus and cartilage. An isolated ACL injury was more commonly found in males, while all other injury profiles of ACL, including combined injuries with meniscus, cartilage and collateral ligament injuries, were more frequently observed in females. The PCL injuries were sustained either during pivoting sports, non-pivoting sports or were traffic-related.

CONCLUSION

Different patient characteristics (BMI, age and sex), and activities at the time of injury (sport- versus traffic-related activities), resulted in distinct injury profiles for the ACL and PCL groups. These findings provide valuable information of the way specific injury patterns of cruciate ligament injuries occur, and subsequently may help clinicians with the diagnostic process of ACL and PCL injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Mid-Term Results following Traumatic Knee Joint Dislocation

PURPOSE

Although treatment strategies of knee joint dislocations have evolved, there is still no consensus on the best method and timing. New therapeutic concepts suggest that early one-stage treatment, including suturing and bracing of the cruciate ligaments in acute knee joint dislocation, are leading to improved functional results. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm functional outcome following traumatic knee joint dislocation and to determine whether the outcome is influenced by the surgical management, patient habitus or concomitant injuries.

METHODS

In this retrospective single center study, 38 patients with acute Schenck type II to IV knee dislocations were treated over an eight-year period in a level I trauma center. At follow-up, various clinical scores, such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and individual questions about rehabilitation and activity levels of 38 patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.7 years. The mean IKDC Score was 65.6 ± 15.7 points, the average Lysholm Score was 70.5 ± 16.4 points and the median TAS was 4 (0-7), resulting in a loss of activity of 2 (range 0-6) points. There was no significant difference between a one-stage treatment compared to a two-stage approach. Ligament reconstruction of the ACL in a two-stage approach was required in only 33.3%. Further operations (early and late) were performed in 37% of cases. Being overweight was associated with more complications and worse outcomes, and external fixation with arthrofibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee dislocation is a severe trauma that often leads to a prolonged loss of function and increased knee pain over years, affecting the patient's activity. Clinical outcome is influenced significantly by concomitant injuries. Severe cases with initial external fixation are associated with a higher risk of knee stiffness and should be considered during rehabilitation. Obese patients present a challenge due to higher complication rates and lower postoperative knee function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective single center study, level III.

Risk of Postoperative Stiffness Following Multiligamentous Knee Injury Surgery Is Not Affected by Obesity: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between obesity and postoperative stiffness following surgical management of multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) using a large two-center cohort, by both 1) using binary cutoffs at various body mass indexes (BMIs) and 2) a linear regression model.

METHODS

190 consecutive patients who underwent surgical management of MLKIs between January 2001 and March 2020 were reviewed at two level 1 academic trauma centers. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA)/lysis of adhesions (LOA) were reviewed. Patients were stratified by obesity grades: grade 1 (BMI 30 to <35) grade 2 (BMI 35 to <40); grade 3 (BMI >40), and compared with a nonobese comparison group with BMI <30. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed, including the covariates of age, gender, BMI, acute versus chronic injury, external fixator, vascular injury, knee dislocation, and Schenck Classification. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rate of MUA between grades of obesity. Analyses were performed with R. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The mean BMI of the cohort was 29.2 kg/m². The mean overall follow-up was 27.2 ± 7.2 months (range: 14-142 months). There were 55 (29.1%) MUA procedures observed at a mean 3.77 ± 2.18 months (range: 1.8-9.7 months) after final MLKI surgery. No significant difference was found in BMI of patients who underwent a MUA compared to patients who did not (30.2 vs 28.8; P = .67). There was no significant difference in rate or time to MUA following MLKI surgery between groups, with logistic regression demonstrating no significance (P = .144). Use of external fixation at the index surgery (OR = 3.3 [95% CI: 2.2, 4.7; P < .0001]) and vascular injury (OR = 6.2 [95% CI: 1.8, 24.5; P = .005]) were found to be independent predictors for need for MUA.

CONCLUSION

No difference in risk for postoperative stiffness requiring MUA following surgery for MLKI was found based on BMI. At all BMI levels, there were no significant increase in need for postoperative MUA, suggesting at minimum a neutralizing effect of obesity on postoperative stiffness. In addition, patients with external fixator use and vascular injury at index surgery were found to be at significantly higher risk for postoperative stiffness requiring MUA following surgery for MLKI. Surgeons should be aware of the risk factors for arthrofibrosis when proceeding with surgical repair or reconstruction of two or more ligaments of the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, multicenter retrospective cohort study.

No Difference in Knee Kinematics Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-First and Posterior Cruciate Ligament-First Fixation During Single-Stage Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

Background:

For combined reconstruction of both the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), there is no consensus regarding which graft should be tensioned and fixed first.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to determine which sequence of graft tensioning and fixation better restores normal knee kinematics. The hypothesis was that ACL-first fixation would more closely restore normal knee kinematics, graft force, and the tibiofemoral orientation in the neutral (resting) position compared with PCL-first fixation.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

A total of 15 unpaired human cadaveric knees were examined using a robotic testing system under the following 4 conditions: (1) 89.0-N anterior tibial load at different knee angles; (2) 89.0-N posterior tibial load at different knee angles; (3) combined rotational 7.0-N·m valgus and 5.0-N·m internal rotation load (simulated pivot shift) at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion; and (4) 5.0-N·m external rotation load at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion. The 4 evaluated knee states were (1) intact ACL and PCL (intact), (2) ACL and PCL deficient (deficient), (3) combined anatomic ACL-PCL reconstruction fixing the ACL first (ACL-first), and (4) combined anatomic ACL-PCL reconstruction fixing the PCL first (PCL-first). A 9.0 mm–diameter quadriceps tendon autograft was used for the ACL graft, tensioned with 40.0 N at 30° of flexion. A 9.5 mm–diameter hamstring tendon autograft (gracilis and semitendinosus, quadrupled loop, and augmented with an additional allograft strand if needed), tensioned with 40.0 N at 90° of flexion, was used for the PCL graft.

Results:

There were no statistically significant differences between ACL-first and PCL-first fixation regarding knee kinematics. ACL-first fixation restored anterior tibial translation to the intact state at all tested knee angles, while PCL-first fixation showed higher anterior tibial translation than the intact state at 90° of flexion (9.05 ± 3.05 and 5.87 ± 2.40 mm, respectively; P = .018). Neither sequence restored posterior tibial translation to the intact state at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. At 15° of flexion, PCL-first fixation restored posterior tibial translation to the intact state, whereas ACL-first fixation did not.

Conclusion:

There were no differences in knee laxity between ACL-first and PCL-first fixation with the ACL graft fixed at 30° and the PCL graft fixed at 90°.

Clinical Relevance:

This study showed that there was no evidence to support the use of one tensioning sequence over the other in single-stage multiligament knee reconstruction.

Outcomes after Multiligament Knee Injury Reconstruction using Novel Graft Constructs and Techniques

Clinical outcomes after reconstruction for multiligamentous knee injury (MLKI) can be consistently favorable. However, recent implants and technique advances may allow for improvement in outcomes. Our institution has developed novel graft constructs and techniques for reconstructions with preclinical data supporting clinical use. Our study purpose was to assess clinical outcomes after reconstruction for MKLI using our constructs and techniques. Overall success rate, failure/revision rates, return to work (RTW)/return to sports (RTS) rates, and complications were evaluated testing the hypothesis that novel methods would be associated with clinical benefits with respect to applications and outcomes compared with historical results. We reviewed a single-surgeon, longitudinal database of 42 patients who underwent multiligament reconstruction at our institution using these techniques for at least two-ligament injuries. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and PROMIS (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Among these patients, 33 patients (mean age of 28.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 33.2 kg/m², mean follow-up of 14.2 months) were included for outcomes analyses. With the definition of success as having a VAS score of less than or equal to 2 without revision/salvage surgery due to recurrent/residual instability or arthritis, overall success rate was 88% (29/33). The mean VAS scores improved from 5 ± 2 to 2 ± 2. The mean preoperative PROMIS mental health score was 36.2 ± 7, general health was 33.5 ± 6, pain was 62.7 ± 8, and physical function score was 29.4 ± 3. At the final follow-up, PROMIS MH was 50.2 ± 10, GH was 44.4 ± 9, pain was 54.3 ± 9, and PF was 42.6 ± 8.4. Return to work rate was 94% (31/33), and 52% (17/33) of patients were able to RTS at any level. Our results demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes associated with a primary success rate of 88% and RTW rate of 94%. Intraoperative complications occurred in 9.5% of cases and revision and failure rates were 9% and 3%, respectively. Our initial results suggest that multiligament reconstructions using novel graft constructs and techniques are safe and effective and can be considered an appropriate option for reconstruction of the full clinical spectrum of MLKIs.

Multi-ligament reconstructions as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in arthroscopic surgery

PURPOSE

Multi-ligament knee injuries are a serious consequence of knee dislocation with a poorly evaluated post-operative complication profile due to low incidence. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of adverse post-operative events associated with operative management of multi-ligament knee injuries.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify patients undergoing surgical procedures for multi-ligament knee injuries from 2006 to 2016 using Current Procedural Terminology codes. We evaluated data on patient demographics and used a propensity score algorithm to adjust for baseline differences in these patients and developed univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to assess effects on minor and severe 30-day post-operative complications.

RESULTS

We identified 444 patients in this database who underwent multi-ligament knee reconstructions between 2006 and 2016. After propensity matching, minor and major adverse post-operative events were more frequent in patients with multi-ligament knee injuries (1.4% vs 0.2%, p < 0.001 and 2.7% vs 1.1%, p = 0.002, respectively). Patients with multi-ligament knee injuries experienced a 55-fold increase risk of need for transfusion (p < 0.001) and a fivefold increased risk of pulmonary embolism (p = 0.025), with most occurring in bicruciate reconstructions (Schenck Classification KD-III and KD-IV injuries).

CONCLUSION

The surgical management of multi-ligament knee injuries confers significant increased risk of 30-day post-operative minor or severe adverse event over arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. These patients are most at risk for post-operative blood transfusion requirement, and pulmonary embolism, with patient's undergoing surgery for bicruciate ligament injuries at particularly high risk of complication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Operative Treatment of Multiligament Knee Injury

Background:

Many factors can affect clinical outcomes and complications after a complex multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Certain aspects of the treatment algorithm for MLKI, such as the timing of surgery, remain controversial.

Purpose:

To determine the risk factors for common complications after MLKI reconstruction.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted on 134 patients with MLKI who underwent reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 at a single academic center. Patients included in the review had a planned surgical reconstruction of >1 ligament based on clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Complications were categorized as (1) wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement, (2) arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions, (3) deep venous thrombosis, (4) need for removal of hardware, and (5) revision ligament surgery. The potential risk factors for complications included patient characteristics, injury pattern categorized according to Schenck classification (knee dislocation [KD] I–KD IV), and timing of surgery. Significant risk factors for complications were analyzed by t test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test.

Results:

A total of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria; of these, 29.6% experienced at least 1 complication. Smoking (odds ratio [OR], 3.20 [95% CI, 1.28-8.02]; P = .01) and planned staged surgery (OR, 2.71 [95% CI, 1.04-7.04]; P = .04) significantly increased the overall risk of complication, while increased time from injury to surgery (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.998]; P < .01) significantly decreased the risk. Increasing time from injury to surgery (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-0.998]; P = .02) also led to a slightly but significantly decreased risk for arthrofibrosis.

Conclusion:

The study findings suggest that smoking, decreased time from injury to initial surgery, and planned staged procedures may increase the rate of complications. Further studies are needed to determine which changes in the treatment algorithm are most effective to reduce the complication rate in patients.

Anatomical repair and ligament bracing of Schenck III and IV knee joint dislocations leads to acceptable subjective and kinematic outcomes

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of anatomical repair and ligament bracing for Schenck III and IV knee dislocation (KD).

METHODS

The results of 27 patients (15 and 12 cases of Schenck III and IV KD, respectively) after a mean follow-up of 18.1 ± 12.1 months (range 6-45 months) were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients suffered high-kinetic-energy accidents, whereas five patients suffered ultralow-velocity (ULV) trauma due to obesity. The outcome measures were the Lysholm score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) score. A kinematic 3D gait analysis with five walking trials was performed to compare the patients and healthy controls.

RESULTS

The mean KSS, HSS score, Lysholm score, and KOOS were 77.4 ± 14.4, 84.6 ± 11.2, 81.5 ± 10.4, and 67.3 ± 16.8, respectively. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The mean range of motion deficiency compared to the healthy side was 24.4 ± 18.5°. Ten patients had first-degree residual laxity of the anterior cruciate ligament; 12 and 2 patients had first- and second-degree residual laxity of the collateral ligament, respectively. Five patients underwent additional arthroscopic arthrolysis due to arthrofibrosis at an average of 6.2 ± 1.9 months (range 4-9 months) after the initial surgery. The 3D gait analysis showed no major differences in joint stability or movement between the patients and healthy controls. Only the ULV trauma patients had significantly lower outcome scores and showed larger kinematic deviations in joint movement during the gait analysis.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical repair with ligament bracing is a suitable surgical procedure in the treatment of KD and provides evidence in clinical practice with the benefit of early, definitive repair and preservation of the native ligaments. Patients reach acceptable subjective and objective functional outcomes, including mainly normalized gait patterns during short-term follow-up, with only minor changes in kinematics and spatial-temporal characteristics. Obese patients who suffered ULV trauma showed significantly inferior outcomes with larger deviations in joint kinematics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Proximal Tibiofibular Joint: A Forgotten Entity in Multi-Ligament Injuries of the Knee

PURPOSE

The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTJF) can be injured with the structures in the lateral aspect of the knee in a multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) patient. Such injuries are scarce but require attention in the management of the complex MLKIs. The assessment and management of such injuries are not well described in the English literature. This study describes the frequency of PTFJ injuries, clinical assessment and functional outcomes of such injuries in MLKI patients.

METHODOLOGY

The data were collected retrospectively from the cohort from 2013 to 2018. The 84 MLKI were included in the study, out of which 9 patients had associated PTFJ injury. All the PTFJ injuries were operated by one single surgeon (D.S) which involves stabilization with K-wires (Kirschner wire) and fixation with 4 mm cancellous cannulated screw along with reconstruction surgery for MLKI in single stage.

RESULTS

The frequency of PTFJ injury in our patient cohort is 10.71%. Three patients out of the nine patients received Larson procedure apart from the fixation of PTFJ. At a mean follow-up of 13 months, the Lysholm score was 77.4 (range: 69-86) and mean modified Cincinnati score was 62 (range: 52-72). There was grade I posterior laxity present in one patient with PCL and PLC injury, one patient with ACL, PCL and PLC injury, and one patient with ACL, PCL, MCL and PLC injury at final follow-up. Terminal flexion of 15° or more restriction was noted in six patients. All patients were satisfied with the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of PTFJ should be an integral part of preoperative as well as an intraoperative examination of MLKI patients. The fixation of this joint is of utmost importance for the reconstructive ligament procedures on the lateral aspect of the knee. The dial test used for the assessment of the integrity of PLC injury should have a prerequisite of proximal tibiofibular joint stability, otherwise, it can lead to erroneous assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Knee Dislocations in the Morbidly Obese Patient

Ultra-low-velocity knee dislocations are historically rare but increasingly common events. They occur most frequently in obese, morbidly obese, and super obese patients during everyday activities, but they can be as severe or more severe than high-velocity knee dislocations. Ultra-low-velocity knee dislocations frequently are associated with neurovascular injury and other complications. Diagnosis, early reduction, and identification and treatment of vascular injuries are critical to reducing the risk of limb ischemia and possibly amputation. Given the size of the limb, maintenance of reduction in these patients almost always requires external fixation. Although surgery on morbidly obese patients may be technically challenging, surgical reconstruction leads to improved subjective and objective results and is recommended.

National trends, 90-day readmission and subsequent knee surgery following multi-ligament knee reconstruction

Introduction/background

Given the uncommon nature of the multi-ligament injured knee, a better understanding of its outcomes may be achieved by contemporary evaluation of a national administrative database. We aim to identify risk factors for 90-day major complications, 90-day readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery after a multi-ligament knee reconstruction.

Methods

The Humana Claims Database was queried for all patients undergoing a multi-ligament knee reconstruction procedure from 2007 to 2016 using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Outcomes of interest included Center of Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS)- reportable 90-day complications, 90-day readmission and subsequent ligament reconstruction or total knee arthroplasty. Predictive factors studied included demographics (ie. age, sex, tobacco use) comorbidity burden and operative factors (ie. surgical setting, diagnosis of knee dislocation, concomitant meniscal repair or meniscectomy).

Results

588 multi-ligament knee reconstruction procedures were identified. The 90-day readmission rate 8.3%. The rate of subsequent ligament surgery was 7.1%. On multivariate regression analysis, a diagnosis of knee dislocation was associated with a four times greater likelihood of readmission and a two and a half greater likelihood of subsequent ligament surgery. Concomitant meniscectomy was associated with higher likelihood of subsequent total knee arthroplasty (9.1, 1.4-67.0) and outpatient setting of surgery compared to inpatient hospital setting was associated with reduced likelihood of readmission.

Conclusion

While uncommon, the patient population undergoing multi-ligament knee surgery is relatively diverse. Understanding common factors predisposing this population to adverse events following surgery may assist in improved outcomes.

Management of acute knee dislocations: anatomic repair and ligament bracing as a new treatment option-results of a multicentre study

PURPOSE

The literature shows no consensus regarding the best method and timing for the treatment of acute knee dislocations. Studies indicate that a one-stage procedure performed in the early stages of injury can lead to superior results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after performing early surgical repair with additional suture augmentation (ligament bracing) of all torn ligaments in acute knee dislocations.

METHODS

In this prospective multicentre study, 73 patients with an acute type III or IV knee dislocation were treated with one-stage ligament bracing within 10 days. Twenty-six patients sustained a type III medial dislocation, thirty-nine patients sustained a type III lateral dislocation, and eight patients presented a type IV dislocation. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Within the follow-up evaluation, various scores were collected (International Knee Documentation Committee IKDC Score, Tegner Score and Lysholm Score). Additional stress radiography was performed (Telos™) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine knee dislocations (Schenck III and IV) with a follow-up at a mean of 14 ± 1.6 months were evaluated. The average IKDC score was 75.5 ± 14.5, the average Lysholm score was 81.0 ± 15.5, and the median loss of activity in the Tegner score was 1 (range 0-3) point. Stress radiographs showed side-to-side differences at a mean of 3.2 ± 1.3 mm for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and of 2.9 ± 2.1 mm for the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The operative revision rate (early and late) was 17.4%. In the early stage, one wound infection and one case of transient common peroneal nerve (CPN) paresis were successfully revised. In the later stage, four patients with knee stiffness and six cases with symptomatic knee instability needed reoperation. Patients without ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations or CPN showed good or excellent results in 87.5% according to the Lysholm score.

CONCLUSION

In cases of acute knee dislocation, primary ACL and PCL transosseous sutures with additional suture augmentation predominantly lead to good and excellent clinical results. Obese patients sustaining ultra-low velocity (ULV) dislocations and patients following injury to the CPN show inferior outcomes. In patients without ULV and CPN intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 10.1%. The obtained results and revision rates show that early primary suture repair is a promising option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective multicentre study, II.

Factors predictive of poorer outcomes in the surgical repair of multiligament knee injuries

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of injury and treatment factors on clinical/functional outcomes in multiligament knee injuries (MLKI).

METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive patients with confirmed and surgically treated MLKI who met inclusion criteria were scheduled for a follow-up visit to obtain: SF-12 and subjective feeling of normalcy between the operated and healthy knee, and IKDC, active range of motion (ROM), and stability exam (Lachman test, posterior drawer, and dial test at 30°). A chart review was used to obtain data on injury and treatment factors.

RESULTS

The postoperative mean (SD) outcomes were: IKDC score 62.7 (25.9), flexion-extension ROM 125° (29°), and percentage of normalcy 74% (20%). The postoperative normal/nearly normal stability exam was: Lachman test 36 (95%) patients, posterior drawer at 90° 38 (97%) patients, and dial test of 39 (100%) patients. There were 24 (61.5%) and 23 (59%) patients with complications and reoperations, respectively. The presence of bicruciate injuries was associated with worse Lachman (p = 0.03) and posterior drawer tests (p = 0.03). Presence of injury to meniscal structures was associated with worse Lachman test (p = 0.03), lower percentage of normalcy (p = 0.02) and extension lag (p = 0.04). Injury to cartilage structures was associated with worse IKDC scores (p = 0.04). IKDC was lower in cases of posterolateral corner reconstruction (p = 0.03) and use of allograft tendons for reconstruction (p = 0.02); ROM was lower in allograft reconstruction (p = 0.02) and need for meniscal repair (p = 0.01). Bicruciate reconstruction led to worst posterior drawer test (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of MLKI might be negatively influenced by bicruciate ligament, meniscal, and cartilage injuries; with regards to treatment characteristics, need for posterolateral corner or bicruciate ligament reconstruction, use of allografts, or need for meniscal repair may similarly diminish outcomes. While surgical treatment provides good overall function, ROM and stability, it rarely results in a "normal" knee and the chances of complications and reoperations are high.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional comparative study, Level III.

Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Critical Analysis Review

Multiligament knee injuries have a strong association with periarticular soft-tissue and neurovascular injuries, which must not be overlooked in the initial evaluation of the patient. Even though magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is imperative for a complete evaluation of the damaged ligamentous knee restraints, stress radiography aids in establishing the functional consequence of the MRI findings and may assist in directing reconstruction. Although cruciate ligament tears are generally reconstructed, a combined repair-reconstruction approach is most useful for collateral ligaments and extra-articular structures, with incorporation of local tissue into the reconstruction whenever possible. Regardless of the timing and operative technique chosen, patients with multiligament knee injuries are at high risk for complications and long-term disability.

Follow-up Compliance and Outcomes of Knee Ligamentous Reconstruction or Repair Patients Enrolled in an Electronic Versus a Traditional Follow-up Protocol

Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used in research and clinical practice, but their collection can be burdensome. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether patients who underwent ligamentous reconstruction or repair of the knee enrolled in an automated electronic follow-up system had greater follow-up compliance than patients enrolled in a traditional follow-up protocol. This study also evaluated whether enrollment in an automated electronic follow-up system was associated with improved surgical outcomes. The authors retrospectively reviewed follow-up data from 183 patients who underwent ligamentous knee reconstruction or repair from 2012 to 2017 by a single surgeon. Follow-up compliance was documented as any contact with a patient greater than 6 weeks from surgery, and patient-reported outcome measures between 3 months and 1 year postoperatively were compared between groups. Patients enrolled in automated electronic follow-up had a trend toward greater follow-up compliance (80.00% vs 74.22%, P=.4028), with greater benefit for patients who underwent multiligamentous knee reconstruction (85.71% vs 65.52%, P=.3048). Patient-reported outcome measures were not significantly different between the traditional follow-up group and the automated follow-up group, despite a significantly greater time from operation to follow-up in the traditional follow-up group (9.3±2.30 vs 7.0±2.88 months, P=.038). Patients enrolled in the traditional follow-up protocol had a significantly increased complication rate (8% vs 0%, P=.034). The use of an automated electronic follow-up system has the potential to significantly increase follow-up compliance, especially in subgroups of patients having classically poor follow-up, with minimal limitations and lower burden on clinicians and staff. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e718-e723.].

Effect of Vascular Injury on Functional Outcome in Knees with Multi-Ligament Injury: A Matched-Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) associated with knee dislocation can result in vascular injury. The purpose of this study was to compare knee function after MLKI between patients with a vascular injury requiring popliteal artery bypass grafting and patients without vascular involvement. Additionally, factors associated with poor knee function in patients who had MLKI with vascular injury were evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified patients with an MLKI between 1992 and 2014. Each patient who had a concomitant vascular injury requiring bypass grafting (vascular cohort, n = 16; mean age, 30.3 years) was matched to 2 patients without a vascular injury (control cohort, n = 32; mean age, 31.4 years) on the basis of age, knee dislocation (KD) grade, and peroneal nerve status. Fifteen patients in the vascular cohort and 26 patients in the control cohort had an isolated knee injury. Functional outcomes were assessed with physical examination of range of motion and ligamentous stability as well as patient-reported outcome scores.

RESULTS

The vascular cohort had a mean Lysholm score of 62.5 points (range, 16 to 100 points) and a mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of 59.7 points (range, 14.9 to 100 points) at a mean (and standard deviation) of 8.3 ± 5.0 years after surgery. The control cohort had a mean Lysholm score of 86.4 points (range, 51.0 to 100.0 points) and a mean IKDC score of 83.8 points (range, 35.6 to 100.0 points) at a mean of 6.0 ± 4.0 years. The vascular cohort had significantly lower Lysholm (p = 0.001) and IKDC (p = 0.002) scores than the control cohort. A body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m was predictive of lower IKDC (p = 0.0009) and Lysholm (p = 0.0008) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who sustain an MLKI with an associated popliteal artery injury requiring bypass grafting have significantly lower knee function scores than patients without vascular involvement. This information can be used to help counsel patients with combined multiple ligament and popliteal artery injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Obesity and Knee Arthroscopy – a Review

Obesity is currently a global epidemic, often referred to as “globesity”, impacting the life of millions worldwide. A risk factor for many diseases, obesity can also be linked to developing intra-articular lesions of the knee, affecting the menisci, ligaments and cartilage. Furthermore, obesity has been shown to influence the outcome of surgical interventions, including those of the musculoskeletal system. Although many studies addressed the relationship of obesity and joint replacement, articles relating to arthroscopy and obesity, and knee arthroscopy in particular, are a bit scarcer. The majority of data suggest that an increase in BMI leads to a similar increase in the rates of intra- and postoperative complications, and most authors agree that a higher body mass index can influence both the procedure itself and its outcomes, including the subjective results reported by the patients. Still, some studies show different results, especially in patients that are overweight or with low-grade obesity, where the outcomes are comparable to those of the non-obese population. Thus, it can be concluded that obesity is an important patient characteristic that needs to be taken into consideration when planning, performing, and assessing the results of knee arthroscopy.

A review of important medical and surgical considerations for obese patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery

Obesity represents a unique challenge in orthopaedic surgery, the impact of which is seen through all phases of injury: in the development of disease, during the operative procedure, and throughout the rehabilitation period. Given the high prevalence of obesity in the United States and around the world, this patient population represents a substantial proportion of patients in need of orthopedic care. The effects of this disease constrain both medical and financial resources. For obese patients undergoing orthopedic procedures, adequate steps must be taken to minimize the risks that occur before, during, and after surgical intervention. This literature review discusses the impact of obesity on arthroscopic procedures, with a focus on procedures involving the shoulder, hip, and knee. The management of obese patients during the perioperative period should address the specific concerns relating to these patients. Obesity is a risk factor for numerous comorbidities, is associated with surgical complications, and is a predictor of poor functional outcomes following arthroscopy. Efforts to minimize the negative impact of obesity on arthroscopic procedures are crucial.

Surgical treatment of multiligament knee injuries

PURPOSE

To analyse one institution's experience with multiligament knee injuries.

METHODS

Over 10 years, 133 multiligament knee injuries including 130 patients were included in the study. Inclusion criteria included: (1) injury to two or more knee ligaments (2) multiligament knee repair/reconstructive surgery.

RESULTS

The average age at time of injury was 26 years old, and 76 % were male. Fifty-one (38 %) multiligament knee injuries had >2 ligaments injured. Peroneal injuries occurred in 26 patients (20 %), and four (3 %) had associated vascular injuries. A high energy mechanism of injury was noted in 39 %. Twenty-five per cent of patients had an additional orthopaedic injury and, 11.5 % suffered additional non-orthopaedic injuries. Definitive surgical intervention was performed acutely (<3 weeks) in 47 %. Ninety-one per cent of multiligament knee injuries underwent reconstruction with or without repair. Forty-three complications occurred in 37 patients. Patients who suffered >2 ligament injury or had surgery acutely were at an increased risk of knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) (p = 0.016 and p = 0.047, respectively). Knees with >2 ligaments injured were associated with higher post-operative complications (p = 0.007). Knee dislocation IV knees were at increased risk to undergo revision surgery (p = 0.041). Obese patients were more likely to have a post-operative infection (p = 0.038). Repair, reconstruction or type of graft used had no impact on need for revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiligament knee injured patients undergoing surgical intervention are a highly complex patient population. This study outlines the patient population, treatment, and complications of one academic institution over 10 years. Overall complications were higher in patients with >2 ligaments injured. Knee stiffness requiring MUA was more common in patients who had >2 ligaments ruptured and those treated acutely. Knees with all four ligaments injured were more likely to undergo revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Editorial Commentary: Hamstring Autografts Are More Frequently Associated With ACL Infection

Hamstring autograft is associated with higher rates of ACL infection than other grafts. Hamstring grafts presoaked with vancomycin are recommended.