1
|
Darbandi AD, Cohn M, Credille K, Hevesi M, Dandu N, Wang Z, Garrigues GE, Verma N, Yanke A. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for the Increased Incidence of Revision Surgery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:1374-1383. [PMID: 38251854 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231182993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 90% of patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) are satisfied with their pain levels and function after surgery. However, a subset of patients experience continued symptoms that warrant revision surgery. Preoperative risk factors for RCR failure requiring revision surgery have not been clearly defined. PURPOSE To (1) determine the rate of RCR failure requiring revision surgery and (2) identify risk factors for revision surgery, which will help surgeons to determine patients who are at the greatest risk for RCR failure. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were performed. The initial search resulted in 3158 titles, and 533 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 10 studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) human clinical studies, (2) arthroscopic RCR, (3) original clinical research, and (4) evaluation of preoperative risk factors for revision. RESULTS After a full-text review, a total of 16 risk factors were recorded and analyzed across 10 studies. Corticosteroid injection was the most consistent risk factor for revision surgery, reaching statistical significance in 4 of 4 studies, followed by workers' compensation status (2/3 studies). Patients with corticosteroid injections had a pooled increased risk of revision surgery by 47% (odds ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.36-1.52]). Patients with workers' compensation had a pooled increased risk of revision surgery by 133% (odds ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 2.09-2.60]). Age, smoking status, diabetes, and obesity were found to be risk factors in half of the analyzed studies. CONCLUSION Corticosteroid injections, regardless of the frequency of injections, and workers' compensation status were found to be significant risk factors across the literature based on qualitative analysis and pooled analysis. Surgeons should determine ideal candidates for arthroscopic RCR by accounting for corticosteroid injection history, regardless of the frequency, and insurance status of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azad Duke Darbandi
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Matthew Cohn
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Navya Dandu
- University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zachary Wang
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nikhil Verma
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Adam Yanke
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pearson ZC, Haft M, Agarwal AR, Rupp MC, Mikula JD, Ahiarakwe U, Best MJ, Srikumaran U. The Effect of Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis on Revision Surgery Rates After Primary Rotator Cuff Repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2024; 8:01979360-202403000-00013. [PMID: 38506707 PMCID: PMC10956974 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-24-00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to use a national database to compare the 4-year revision surgery rates after rotator cuff repair (RCR) in patients with concomitant biceps tenodesis (BT) versus those without BT. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the PearlDiver database from 2015 to 2017. Patients undergoing primary open and arthroscopic RCR with and without BT were identified. Demographic variables, 90-day complications, and 2- and 4-year revision surgery rates were analyzed, and a multivariable logistic regression was conducted. RESULTS Of the 131,155 patients undergoing RCR, 24,487 (18.7%) underwent concomitant BT and 106,668 (81.3%) did not. After controlling for comorbidities and demographics, patients with concomitant BT were associated with lower odds of all-cause revision (OR; P-value [0.77; P < 0.001]), revision BT (0.65; P < 0.001), revision RCR (0.72; P < 0.001), and shoulder arthroplasty (0.81; P = 0.001) within 4 years when compared with those without concomitant BT. DISCUSSION In our analysis, patients undergoing primary RCR with concomitant BT had 35% reduced odds of revision BT and 23% reduced odds of any all-cause revision within 4 years when compared with those without concomitant BT. This suggests that tenodesis at the time of primary RCR may be associated with a reduction in the utilization of ipsilateral shoulder revision surgery rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary C. Pearson
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Mark Haft
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Amil R. Agarwal
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Marco-Christopher Rupp
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Jacob D. Mikula
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Uzoma Ahiarakwe
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Matthew J. Best
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| | - Uma Srikumaran
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mr. Pearson, Mr. Haft, Mr. Agarwal, Dr. Mikula, Mr. Ahiarakwe, Dr. Best, Dr. Srikumaran); Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO (Dr. Rupp)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Livesey MG, Bains SS, Weir TB, Kolakowski L, Rocca MS, Remily EA, Gilotra MN, Hasan SA. Does timing matter? The effect of preoperative smoking cessation on the risk of infection or revision following rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:1937-1944. [PMID: 37030604 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nicotine in tobacco products is known to impair bone and tendon healing, and smoking has been associated with an increased rate of retear and reoperation following rotator cuff repair (RCR). Although smoking is known to increase the risk of failure following RCR, former smoking status and the timing of preoperative smoking cessation have not previously been investigated. METHODS A national all-payer database was queried for patients undergoing RCR between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive groups according to smoking history: (1) never smokers (n = 50,000), (2) current smokers (n = 28,291), (3) former smokers with smoking cessation 3-6 months preoperatively (n = 34,513), (4) former smokers with smoking cessation 6-12 months preoperatively (n = 786), and (5) former smokers with smoking cessation >12 months preoperatively (n = 1399). The risks of postoperative infection and revision surgery were assessed at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years following surgery. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to isolate and evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS The 90-day rate of infection following RCR was 0.28% in never smokers compared with 0.51% in current smokers and 0.52% in former smokers who quit smoking 3-6 months prior to surgery (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression identified smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; P < .001) and smoking cessation 3-6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.56; P < .001) as risk factors for 90-day infection. The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. However, smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a significant elevation in infection risk. In addition, smoking was associated with an elevated 90-day revision risk (OR, 1.22; P = .038), as was smoking cessation between 3 and 6 months prior to surgery (OR, 1.19; P = .048). The elevated risk in these groups persisted at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Smoking cessation >6 months prior to surgery was not associated with a statistically significant elevation in revision risk. CONCLUSION Current smokers and former smokers who quit smoking within 6 months of RCR are at an elevated risk of postoperative infection and revision surgery at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively compared with never smokers. Former smokers who quit >6 months prior to RCR are not at a detectably elevated risk of infection or revision surgery compared with those who have never smoked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Livesey
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sandeep S Bains
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tristan B Weir
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Logan Kolakowski
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael S Rocca
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ethan A Remily
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohit N Gilotra
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - S Ashfaq Hasan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Increasing rates of ulnar collateral ligament repair outpace reconstruction in isolated injuries: review of a Texas surgical database. JSES Int 2022; 7:192-197. [PMID: 36820426 PMCID: PMC9937821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The gold standard of treatment for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries has been reconstruction. Despite early repair studies yielding less than satisfactory results, there has been recent renewed interest in UCL repair due to improved outcomes and new technologies. Data regarding clinical use of these procedures are lacking. The purpose of this study was to define the epidemiological trends of UCL repair and reconstruction surgery from 2010 to 2019, compare demographic characteristics of patients undergoing either procedure, and determine incidence of concomitant procedures in each surgical group as well as comparing respective patient-level charges. Methods A retrospective database analysis of UCL surgeries was performed through the Texas Healthcare Information Collection database, a comprehensive and publicly available statewide billing dataset. Inclusion criteria were defined using Current Procedural Terminology billing codes for elbow UCL repair and reconstruction between 2010 through 2019, excluding patients who had concomitant elbow fractures or lateral collateral ligament tears indicative of high-energy trauma. Procedural volume changes, patient demographics, and commonly performed concomitant procedures including elbow arthroscopy, ulnar nerve surgery, and platelet-rich plasma injection were compared. Total patient-level charges were compared across groups. Results A total of 1664 patients were included, consisting of 484 UCL repairs and 1180 reconstructions. Total UCL surgeries increased eleven-fold when corrected for population growth from 2010 (N = 25) to 2019 (N = 315). In 2010, repair constituted 23% of all UCL tear surgeries and increased to 40% by the end of 2019. The annual frequency of UCL repair increased at a 5.4% faster rate than UCL reconstruction from 2010 to 2019 (P < .001). There were no significant differences between any demographic data between UCL repair and reconstruction except for rural surgical settings which demonstrated 1.8 times greater odds of undergoing reconstruction (P = .05). There were no differences among commonly associated procedures including ulnar nerve surgery (P = .217), elbow arthroscopy (P = .092), and platelet-rich plasma injection (P = .837) with no differences in patient-level charges at any time point (P = .47). Conclusion While reconstruction remains more common, the annual frequency of UCL repair is increasing at a faster rate. Since were no demographic differences aside from surgical setting, it can be inferred that patients who were previously receiving reconstruction are instead undergoing repair. This highlights the need for future studies to further identify surgical indications for the two interventions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoch BS, Werner BC, Shapiro SA, Camp CL, Chalmers PN, Cancienne JM. Effect of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation on the Rate of Revision Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221127004. [PMID: 36353396 PMCID: PMC9638537 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221127004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The application of orthobiologics at the time of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) has received an increasing amount of clinical interest despite a relative scarcity of human clinical studies on their efficacy. Purpose To utilize a national administrative database to determine the association of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied at the time of RCR with revision surgery rates. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods The Mariner data set from the PearlDiver patient records repository was utilized to identify patients undergoing RCR using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 29827. Patients receiving BMAC or PRP at the time of RCR were then identified using CPT coding. For comparison purposes, a matched cohort was created consisting of patients who underwent RCR without biologic augmentation in a 5:1 fashion for each biologic separately. Cases were matched according to age, sex, tobacco use, biceps tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, and subacromial decompression. All groups were then queried for revision RCR or conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Revision rates were compared utilizing a multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated. Results A total of 760 patients who underwent biologic augmentation during RCR were identified, including 646 patients in the PRP group and 114 patients in the BMAC group. They were compared with 3800 matched controls without documented biologic application at the time of surgery. Compared with matched controls, patients who received BMAC at the time of surgery experienced a significantly lower incidence of revision surgery at 2 years (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.82; P = .015). There was no significant difference in revision rates between PRP and matched controls (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62-1.23; P = .183). Conclusion The application of BMAC at the time of RCR was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of revision surgery. There was no apparent effect of PRP on the incidence of revision surgery after primary RCR. Higher-level clinical studies considering surgical factors are needed to more clearly define the role of biologic adjuvants in RCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley S. Schoch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville,
Florida, USA
| | - Brian C. Werner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Shane A. Shapiro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville,
Florida, USA
| | | | - Peter N. Chalmers
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake
City, Utah, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fan N, Yuan S, Du P, Wu Q, Li J, Kong X, Zhu W, Hong G, Zang L. The effects of smoking on clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:656-667. [PMID: 34813890 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several factors have been reported to adversely affect clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, the effects of smoking on rotator cuff healing and clinical outcomes remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and structural outcomes after RCR between smokers and nonsmokers. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in the clinical scores after RCR and that smoking would be associated with a significantly increased risk of retear and reoperation. METHODS This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We included only articles in which patients underwent arthroscopic and open RCR, the clinical outcome scores were reported for smokers and nonsmokers, and the number of rotator cuff retears and reoperations were reported. Data relevant to this study were extracted and statistically analyzed. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the risk of bias in each study and calculated the I2 value to quantify the effect of heterogeneity. RESULTS Fourteen eligible articles were identified, with 73,817 participants (8553 smokers and 65,264 nonsmokers). The meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .10), Simple Shoulder Test score (P = .19), University of California-Los Angeles score (P = .09), or visual analog scale score (P = .19) between smokers and nonsmokers after surgery, but the Constant score was significantly lower (P = .005) for smokers. Smoking was significantly associated with an increased risk of retear (P = .002; risk ratio, 2.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.28]; I2 = 31%) and reoperation (P < .001; risk ratio, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.40]; I2 = 36%) in patients after RCR. CONCLUSION Besides the Constant score, which was lower in smokers, there were no significant differences in the clinical scores after RCR between smokers and nonsmokers. However, smoking was associated with a significantly increased risk of retear and reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuo Yuan
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Du
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qichao Wu
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaochuan Kong
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenyi Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Hong
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zang
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Truong NM, Cevallos N, Lansdown DA, Ma CB, Feeley BT, Zhang AL. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Lower Two-Year Reoperation Rates Compared With Open Rotator Cuff Repair in a Large Cross-sectional Cohort. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e2015-e2023. [PMID: 34977661 PMCID: PMC8689274 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To use a large, contemporary database to perform a cross-sectional analysis of current practice trends in rotator cuff repair (RCR) for the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tear (RCT) and determine outcomes of arthroscopic and open RCR, including hospital readmissions and 2-year reoperation rates with accurate laterality tracking using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. METHODS The PearlDiver Mariner dataset was used to query patients with full-thickness RCTs from 2010 to 2017. Propensity-score matching was performed to account for differences in age and comorbidities and allow for comparison between those undergoing open RCR and arthroscopic RCR. Subsequent procedures were tracked using ICD-10 codes to identify ipsilateral surgery within 2 years of index surgery. Hospital and emergency department admission within 30 days of surgery were investigated. RESULTS Of 534,076 patients diagnosed with full-thickness RCT, 37% underwent RCR; 73% of which were arthroscopic. From 2010 to 2017, arthroscopic RCRs increased from 65% to 80%, whereas open RCRs decreased from 35% to 20% (P < .0001). Younger patients underwent arthroscopic RCR more frequently, and patients who underwent open RCR had greater rates of 30-day emergency department (7.0%) and hospital readmission (2.0%) compared with arthroscopic RCR (6.3%, 1.0%, respectively) (P < .0001). For 24,392 patients with ICD-10 coding and 2-year follow-up, 10.4% of patients required reoperation, with the most common procedure being revision RCR, and 1.3% required conversion to arthroplasty. Open RCRs were more likely to require subsequent surgery (11.3%) compared with arthroscopic RCR (9.5%) (P < .0001). Patients aged 50 to 59 had the greatest rate of reoperation (14.0%), but no patients younger than age 40 years required reoperation, and no patients younger than age 50 years required conversion to arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of arthroscopic RCR has continued to increase compared to open RCR. In this large cross-sectional analysis, arthroscopic RCR demonstrated lower 2-year reoperation rates and 30-day readmission rates compared to open RCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, cross-sectional study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Truong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Nicolas Cevallos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - C Benjamin Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Alan L Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chronic Preoperative Opioids Are Associated With Revision After Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:1110-1114.e5. [PMID: 33278529 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to clarify the relationship between chronic preoperative opioids and complications following rotator cuff repair. Specifically, we assessed revision, a definitive postoperative end point for surgical outcome. METHODS This study used PearlDiver, a United States national insurance claims database. All patients undergoing rotator cuff repair from 2008 to 2018 were identified and stratified based on a minimum of 2 opioid prescriptions within the 6 months before surgery, with 1 prescription occurring within 0 to 3 months before surgery and a second prescription within 4 to 6 months before surgery. Univariate logistic regressions of risk factors were conducted, followed by multivariate analysis of comorbidities, including ongoing preoperative opioids, any preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescriptions, age, sex, diabetes, tobacco, and obesity. RESULTS In total, 28,939 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were identified, of whom 10,695 had opioid prescriptions within both 0 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months before index rotator cuff repair, whereas 18,244 had no opioid prescriptions within the 6-month preoperative period. In total, 977 (3.4%) patients underwent revision within 6 months, which increased to 1311 (4.5%) within 1 year of the index procedure. In the multivariate analysis controlling for age, preoperative NSAID prescriptions, tobacco, diabetes, obesity, and sex, we observed a significant association between chronic preoperative opioid prescriptions and rotator cuff repair revision (6-month odds ratio 1.12; P = .021, 1-year odds ratio 1.43; P < .001) following index procedure. CONCLUSIONS We report increased rates of revision within both 6 months and 1 year in patients with prolonged preoperative opioid prescriptions. The opioid cohort had greater rates of preoperative NSAID use and tobacco use, which also were observed to be independent risk factors for revision at both timepoints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III; Retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lu Y, Agarwalla A, Patel BH, Nolte MT, Cancienne J, Verma N, Cole BJ, Forsythe B. Influence of workers' compensation status on postoperative outcomes in patients following biceps tenodesis: a matched-pair cohort analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2530-2537. [PMID: 33190754 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Although the literature on the association of workers' compensation (WC) status with negative outcomes after orthopedic surgery is extensive, there is a paucity of evidence on outcomes in WC recipients undergoing biceps tenodesis. We hypothesized that WC patients would report significantly worse outcomes postoperatively on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS Functional and health-related quality-of-life PROMs and a visual analog scale score for pain were administered preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively to consecutive patients undergoing isolated biceps tenodesis between 2014 and 2018 at our institution. Thirty-eight WC patients were matched 1:2 to non-WC patients by age, body mass index, and operative limb. The minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state were calculated for all patients via anchor- and distribution-based methods. Rates of achievement and the likelihood of achievement were determined. RESULTS All patients showed significant improvements in all outcome measures (P < .001). WC patients reported inferior postoperative scores on all PROMs examined. WC status significantly predicted a reduced likelihood of achieving substantial clinical benefit for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.81; P = .01) and the patient acceptable symptom state (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.65; P = .003) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.61; P = .003), Constant-Murley Subjective Assessment (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.77; P = .016), and visual analog scale pain score (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.47; P < .001). CONCLUSION WC patients reported inferior scores on all postoperative PROMs and demonstrated lower odds of achieving substantial benefit and satisfaction regarding improvements in both function and pain compared with non-WC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yining Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Avinesh Agarwalla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Bhavik H Patel
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jourdan Cancienne
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil Verma
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vora M, Sing DC, Curry EJ, Kamal RN, Li X. National Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Without Arthritis. Orthopedics 2020; 43:e409-e414. [PMID: 32602925 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20200619-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Both rotator cuff repair (RCR) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are effective treatment options for chronic large degenerative rotator cuff tear (RCT) in the elderly. The goal of this study was to evaluate national trends for surgical management of chronic RCT among patients without glenohumeral arthritis. The authors conducted a retrospective review from 2007 to 2015 using the PearlDiver database. The study included patients who had the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis of chronic RCT without shoulder arthritis. Procedural codes from the Current Procedural Terminology and the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, were used to identify patients undergoing RCR or RTSA. Chi-square analysis assessed differences between the groups, and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to evaluate trends over time. Overall, 428,651 patients had chronic RCT without arthritis; 364,141 (84.9%) were treated nonoperatively, 53,566 (12.5%) underwent RCR, and 10,944 (2.6%) underwent RTSA. Patients who were 60 to 79 years old had the highest rate of surgical intervention (70.8% of all surgical patients), with 69.2% and 78.4% who underwent RCR and RTSA, respectively. A 3-fold increase in RTSA use was noted among patients 60 years and older vs patients younger than 60 years. Overall revision rates 2 years after RCR and RTSA among patients 60 to 79 years old were 13.0% and 3.7%, respectively. Revision rates after RCR remained constant over time (9.3% to 13.0%; P=.082), whereas revision rates after RTSA decreased significantly over time (12.1% to 2.2%; P=.016). Older patients were more likely to be treated nonoperatively compared with younger patients, but among those patients treated with RTSA, there was a 3-fold increase in the use of RTSA in patients older than 60 years compared with patients younger than 60 years. Further, the authors found that revision rates after RTSA decreased over time (from 12% to 2%), suggesting better implant design, improved knowledge of implant positioning, and increased surgical proficiency. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e409-e414.].
Collapse
|
11
|
Wagner ER, Woodmass JM, Chang MJ, Welp KM, Higgins LD, Warner JJP. The impact of workers' compensation on recovery after biceps tenodesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:1783-1788. [PMID: 32359714 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remains a paucity of studies examining the impact of workers' compensation (WC) on a variety of outcomes after biceps tenodesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative recovery curves after biceps tenodesis in patients with and without WC claims. METHODS Using the Surgical Outcomes System database, we assessed the postoperative recovery outcomes of all patients who had outcomes recorded at least 6 months after isolated biceps tenodesis for the treatment of a diagnosis of biceps tendinitis, stratified by WC status. The outcomes analyzed included visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, VR-12 (Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey) mental and physical, Simple Shoulder Test, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. RESULTS Overall, 139 patients with WC claims underwent isolated biceps tenodesis vs. 786 patients without WC claims. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities were similar in the 2 groups. Patients without WC claims had significantly improved visual analog scale, VR-12, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Simple Shoulder Test scores at all times points after 3 months and 1 year compared with patients with WC claims. CONCLUSIONS On analysis of patients' recovery after isolated biceps tenodesis, WC claims led to significantly worse pain and functional outcomes at every time point of analysis (3, 6, 12, and 24 months). Furthermore, patients with WC claims had worse preoperative-to-postoperative improvements in most outcomes. This information can be used to educate surgeons and patients on postoperative expectations, as well as to perform analyses focused on health economics, value, and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric R Wagner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | | | - Michelle J Chang
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Kathryn M Welp
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jon J P Warner
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Access to Elective Orthopaedic Surgery After the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion: The New York State Experience. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e158-e163. [PMID: 31365357 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, states were given the option of expanding Medicaid coverage to include adults younger than age 65 years with income at or below 138% of the federal poverty level. Although this expansion was intended to provide health care coverage to an estimated 20 million Americans, several studies have shown increased coverage does not equate to increased access to care by specialty providers. METHODS We queried the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database and identified all patients who underwent the 10 most common elective orthopaedic surgeries from January 1, 2012, through March 31, 2016. Medicaid monthly enrollment for the 4-year study period was obtained from NY Department of Health Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Reports. RESULTS Our query identified 700,159 patients who underwent the investigated orthopaedic surgeries. Of these, 60,786 were Medicaid recipients. During the 4-year study period, Medicaid enrollment and the number of procedures reimbursed by Medicaid increased significantly (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS Affordable Care Act-supported Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in Medicaid enrollment and a concomitant increase in the utilization of orthopaedic surgery by Medicaid beneficiaries in New York State.
Collapse
|
13
|
Savin DD, Waterman BR, Sumner S, Richardson C, Newgren J, Gowd AK, Romeo AA. Management of Failed Proximal Biceps Surgery: Clinical Outcomes After Revision to Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48:460-465. [PMID: 31855452 DOI: 10.1177/0363546519892922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preferred surgical technique to manage biceps-superior labral pathology is often debated, and rates of revision and persistence of pain vary widely according to surgical technique and patient characteristics. PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing revision subpectoral tenodesis after failed primary tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS All patients undergoing revision biceps management by the senior surgeon between 2006 and 2016 and with a minimum 24-month follow-up were retrospectively identified. Patients being treated with concomitant rotator cuff repair or capsular release were excluded. Patient characteristic variables were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes including the functional score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), visual analog scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons were obtained, and range of motion, strength, and complications were quantified. RESULTS In total, 25 patients with revision biceps tenodesis were identified at a mean follow-up of 76.5 ± 31.5 months. The average age was 44.4 ± 14.3 years, and the surgical indications included failure of index suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (56%), subpectoral biceps tenodesis (36%), and patient dissatisfaction after tenotomy (8%). There was a significant improvement in the VAS score (P < .001), SANE (P = .001), SST (P = .035), functional score (P < .001), and forward elevation (P = .028), whereas postoperative strength (P = .440), abduction (P = .100), and external rotation (P = .745) improvement failed to achieve statistical significance after revision surgery. There was no difference in postoperative outcome measures between modes of failures, concomitant procedures, and sex. Twenty-two (88%) patients reported high satisfaction and stated they would have this revision surgery again. The overall complication rate was 48%, with half of these reporting pain of >3 on a scale of 10 and 4% of patients requiring additional surgeries. CONCLUSION The current study demonstrates high patient satisfaction (88%) and significant improvement in functional outcomes with revision biceps tenodesis, a mini-open subpectoral technique, after previous failed tenodesis or tenotomy. Although this may be an effective strategy to address failed prior biceps surgery, the potential complication of persistent pain must be emphasized. Patients should be counseled on the high complication rate (48%), with persistent pain being the most common complaint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Savin
- Desert Orthopedic Center at Eisenhower, Palm Desert, California, USA
| | - Brian R Waterman
- Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anirudh K Gowd
- Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Minimum Five-year Outcomes and Clinical Survivorship for Arthroscopic Transosseous-equivalent Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27:e1093-e1101. [PMID: 31805019 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair (RCR) techniques, midterm outcome data are limited. The purpose of this article was to assess midterm clinical outcomes of patients following arthroscopic TOE RCR using either a knotless tape bridge (TB) repair or knotted suture bridge (SB) repair technique. We hypothesized that there would be significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes with TOE RCR that would be durable over time. We also hypothesized that the knotless TB technique would yield equivalent clinical results to the knotted SB technique, but that there would be differences in retear types between the two TOE techniques. METHODS Patients included were a minimum of 5 years from an index arthroscopic double-row TOE repair using either a knotless TB or knotted SB technique for one, two, or three tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus tendon. Preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and satisfaction scores were collected. Scores were also stratified and compared based on primary and revision repair, tear location, and tear chronicity. Outcomes between techniques were contrasted, and survivorship analysis was conducted, with failure defined as progression to revision surgery. RESULTS One-hundred ninety-two shoulders were included with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 5.0 to 11.0 years). Fifteen shoulders (7.8%) underwent revision cuff repair. All scores improved significantly for TB repair (P < 0.001). For SB repair, all scores improved, but only American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Short-Form 12 Physical Component Summary scores (P < 0.05) demonstrated statistical significance. No statistically significant differences were found between the repair techniques when stratified by primary and revision repairs, tear location, or chronicity. Postoperative clinical survivorship was 96.6% and 93.6% for knotted SB repairs and 96.7% and 93.9% for knotless TB repairs at 2 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSION TOE RCR results in significant clinical improvement and excellent survivorship at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up, using either knotted SB or knotless TB repair techniques in primary and revision cases and in small and large tears. Equivalent results were obtained with both TOE techniques. Patients undergoing repair with a TOE showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes that were durable at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively.
Collapse
|
15
|
Behery OA, Suchman KI, Paoli AR, Luthringer TA, Campbell KA, Bosco JA. What are the prevalence and risk factors for repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27:3345-3353. [PMID: 30656373 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05348-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of arthroscopic knee surgeries performed annually has increased over the last decade. It remains unclear what proportion of individuals undergoing knee arthroscopy is at risk for subsequent ipsilateral procedures. Better knowledge of risk factors and the incidence of reoperative ipsilateral arthroscopy are important in setting expectations and counselling patients on treatment options. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of repeat ipsilateral knee arthroscopy, and the risk factors associated with subsequent surgery over long-term follow-up. METHODS The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems outpatient database was reviewed from 2003 to 2016 to identify patients who underwent elective, primary knee arthroscopy for one of the following diagnosis-related categories of procedures: Group 1: cartilage repair and transfer; Group 2: osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions; Group 3: meniscal repair, debridement, chondroplasty, and synovectomy; Group 4: multiple different procedures. Subjects were followed for 10 years to determine the odds of subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy. Risk factors including the group of arthroscopic surgery, age group, gender, race, insurance type, surgeon volume, and comorbidities were analysed to identify factors predicting subsequent surgery. RESULTS A total of 765,144 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2003 and 2016, were identified. The majority (751,873) underwent meniscus-related arthroscopy. The proportion of patients undergoing subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy was 2.1% at 1-year, 5.5% at 5 years, and 6.7% at 10 years of follow-up. Among patients who underwent subsequent arthroscopic surgery at 1-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up, there was a greater proportion of patients with worker's compensation insurance (p < 0.001), index operations performed by very high volume surgeons (p < 0.001), and cartilage restoration index procedures (p < 0.001), compared with those who never underwent repeat ipsilateral surgery. CONCLUSION Understanding the incidence of subsequent knee arthroscopy after index procedure in different age groups and the patterns over 10 years of follow-up is important in counselling patients and setting future expectations. The majority of subsequent surgeries occur within the first 5 years after index surgery, and subjects tend to have higher odds of ipsilateral reoperation for up to 10 years if they have worker's compensation insurance, or if their index surgery was performed by a very high volume surgeon, or was a cartilage restoration procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar A Behery
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Kelly I Suchman
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Albit R Paoli
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Tyler A Luthringer
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Kirk A Campbell
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Joseph A Bosco
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Woodmass JM, Wagner ER, Borque KA, Chang MJ, Welp KM, Warner JJP. Superior capsule reconstruction using dermal allograft: early outcomes and survival. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:S100-S109. [PMID: 31196503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) has shown promising outcomes in its initial description, but lacks additional reports analyzing outcomes. This study analyzes early outcomes of SCRs in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all SCRs at our institution from January 1, 2015, to August 31, 2017, was performed with a minimum 6-months follow-up. A total of 34 patients were included with a mean age of 60 years. SCR was performed by 1 of 6 fellowship trained surgeons. RESULTS At an average follow-up of 12 months, 22 patients were identified as failures after modified Neer classification. Furthermore, 8 of these patients have undergone a reoperation, whereas an additional 14 patients were considered clinical failures experiencing continued pain and a lack of shoulder function. Of note, 2 of the 3 patients with a subscapularis tear had a failure. In addition, revision cases, female gender, increased fatty infiltration in the infraspinatus and low surgeon volume were associated with a higher rate of failure. There was no significant improvement in range of motion or functional scores. CONCLUSION SCR performed for large-to-massive irreparable rotator cuff tears has a high rate of persistent pain and poor function leading to clinical failure in 65% of patients. Risk factors predicting clinical failure included revision cases, female gender, increased Goutallier fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus, and low surgeon volume (n ≤ 10).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric R Wagner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kyle A Borque
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle J Chang
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn M Welp
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jon J P Warner
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Traven SA, Brinton D, Simpson KN, Adkins Z, Althoff A, Palsis J, Slone HS. Preoperative Shoulder Injections Are Associated With Increased Risk of Revision Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy 2019; 35:706-713. [PMID: 30733035 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to determine whether the timing of preoperative shoulder injections is associated with an increased risk of revision rotator cuff repair following primary rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS A retrospective analysis of claims data of privately insured subjects from the MarketScan database for the years 2010 to 2014 was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compare the odds of reoperation between groups. Laterality for the injection, index procedure, and subsequent surgery were verified for all subjects. RESULTS A total of 4,959 subjects with an arthroscopic RCR were identified, 392 of whom required revision RCR within the following 3 years. Patients who had an injection within 6 months preceding the index surgery were at a much higher risk of undergoing reoperation for revision RCR: 0 to 3 months prior, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.375 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-1.840); 3 to 6 months prior, AOR 1.822 (95% CI, 1.290-2.573); and 6 to 12 months prior, AOR 1.237 (95% CI, 0.787-1.943). CONCLUSIONS Patients who had received an injection within 6 months prior to RCR were much more likely to undergo a revision cuff repair within the following 3 years. The risk of reoperation significantly declines if there is more than 6 months between injection and RCR. Consideration should be given to minimizing preoperative injections in patients requiring RCR or delaying primary RCR for 6 months following injection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia A Traven
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A..
| | - Daniel Brinton
- Department of Healthcare Leadership and Management College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kit N Simpson
- Department of Healthcare Leadership and Management College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Zachary Adkins
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Alyssa Althoff
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - John Palsis
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Harris S Slone
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kosinski LR, Gil JA, Durand WM, DeFroda SF, Owens BD, Daniels AH. 30-Day readmission following outpatient rotator cuff repair: an analysis of 18,061 cases. PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED 2018; 46:466-470. [PMID: 30021075 DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1502571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to identify patient characteristics that increase risk for unplanned readmission within 30 days of an initial hospital stay after outpatient rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) datasets from 2012 to 2015. Patients were preliminarily included in the study based on the presence of a primary Common Procedural Terminology code for RCR (23410, 23412, 23420, and 29827). Only non-emergent, outpatient, and elective procedures performed on patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) ≤4 were considered. The primary outcome variables were 30-day unplanned readmission after outpatient surgery. Secondary analyses were implemented to establish reason and timing of readmission. RESULTS A total of 18,061 cases were reviewed, and 199 (1%) patients experienced 30-day unplanned readmission. Age ≥80 (OR = 2.13, p = 0.0276), COPD (OR = 1.75, p = 0.0354), hypertension requiring medication (OR = 1.67, p = 0.0027), dialysis (OR = 13.46, p < 0.0001) and an ASA classification of 3 (OR = 2.78, p = 0.0143) or ASA 4 (OR = 6.15, p = 0.0012) were identified as major prognosticators for readmission. Female sex was associated with lower odds of readmission (OR = 0.54, p = 0.0001). The most common complications associated with readmission were cardiovascular (29%), infection (19%), and respiratory (17%). CONCLUSIONS The rate of 30-day unplanned inpatient readmission following outpatient RCR using the NSQIP data was found to be 1%, with advanced age and preexisting medical comorbidities contributing to the highest odds of readmission. Cardiovascular, infectious, and respiratory complications contributed to the majority of readmissions. The ability to identify patients with these risk factors will be of utility in optimizing outcomes and cost-effectiveness of RCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay R Kosinski
- a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
| | - Joseph A Gil
- a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
| | - Wesley M Durand
- b Warren Alpert Medical School , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
| | - Steven F DeFroda
- b Warren Alpert Medical School , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
| | - Brett D Owens
- a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School , Brown University , Providence , RI , USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suchman KI, Behery OA, Mai DH, Anil U, Bosco JA. The Demographic and Geographic Trends of Meniscal Procedures in New York State: An Analysis of 649,470 Patients Over 13 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100:1581-1588. [PMID: 30234622 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.01341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine the geographic and demographic variations and time trends of different types of meniscal procedures in New York State to determine whether disparities exist in access to treatment. METHODS The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) outpatient database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent elective, primary knee arthroscopy between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2015, for 1 of the following diagnosis-related categories: Group 1, meniscectomy; Group 2, meniscal repair; and Group 3, meniscal allograft transplantation, with or without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The 3 groups of meniscal procedures were compared on geographic distribution, patient age, insurance, concomitant ACLR, and surgeon and hospital volume over the study period. RESULTS A total of 649,470 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2003 and 2015 were identified for analysis. Both meniscectomies and meniscal repairs had a scattered distribution throughout New York State, with allograft volume concentrated at urban academic hospitals. The majority of patients who underwent any meniscal procedure had private insurance, with Medicaid patients having the lowest rates of meniscal surgery. At high-volume hospitals, meniscal repairs and allografts are being performed with increasing frequency, especially in patients <25 years of age. Meniscal repairs are being performed concomitantly with ACLR with increasing frequency. CONCLUSIONS Meniscal repairs and allografts are being performed at high-volume hospitals for privately insured patients with increasing frequency. Geographic access to these treatments, particularly allografts, is limited. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Disparities in the availability of advanced meniscal treatment require further investigation and understanding to improve access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly I Suchman
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Omar A Behery
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - David H Mai
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Utkarsh Anil
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mahure SA, Mollon B, Capogna BM, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW, Rokito AS. Risk factors for recurrent instability or revision surgery following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B:324-330. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b3.bjj-2017-0557.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Aims The factors that predispose to recurrent instability and revision stabilization procedures after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability remain unclear. We sought to determine the rate and risk factors associated with ongoing instability in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for instability of the shoulder. Materials and Methods We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database to identify patients with a diagnosis of anterior instability of the shoulder undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2003 and 2011. Patients were followed for a minimum of three years. Baseline demographics and subsequent further surgery to the ipsilateral shoulder were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for recurrent instability. Results A total of 5719 patients were analyzed. Their mean age was 24.9 years (sd 9.3); 4013 (70.2%) were male. A total of 461 (8.1%) underwent a further procedure involving the ipsilateral shoulder at a mean of 31.5 months (sd 23.8) postoperatively; 117 (2.1%) had a closed reduction and 344 (6.0%) had further surgery. Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was the most common subsequent surgical procedure (223; 65.4%). Independent risk factors for recurrent instability were: age < 19 years (odds ratio 1.86), Caucasian ethnicity (hazard ratio 1.42), bilateral instability of the shoulder (hazard ratio 2.17), and a history of closed reduction(s) prior to the initial repair (hazard ratio 2.45). Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated with significantly higher rates of ongoing persistent instability than revision open stabilization (12.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.041). Conclusion The incidence of a further procedure being required in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability was 8.1%. Younger age, Caucasian race, bilateral instability, and closed reduction prior to the initial repair were independent risk factors for recurrent instability, while subsequent revision arthroscopic Bankart repair had significantly higher rates of persistent instability than subsequent open revision procedures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:324–30.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. A. Mahure
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital
for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, New
York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | - B. M. Capogna
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital
for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, New
York, NY 10016, USA
| | - J. D. Zuckerman
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital
for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, New
York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Y. W. Kwon
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital
for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, New
York, NY 10016, USA
| | - A. S. Rokito
- NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital
for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, New
York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kester BS, Capogna B, Mahure SA, Ryan MK, Mollon B, Youm T. Independent Risk Factors for Revision Surgery or Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy: A Review of a Large Statewide Database From 2011 to 2012. Arthroscopy 2018; 34:464-470. [PMID: 29306657 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2017] [Revised: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To use a large heterogeneous population to identify independent risk factors for revision surgery or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthroscopy. METHODS The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried from 2011 through 2012 to identify patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. All patients aged 18 years or older who underwent hip arthroscopy according to Current Procedural Terminology coding were included. We chose to divide surgical volume into tertiles for the purposes of statistical analysis. Longitudinal analysis for a minimum of 2 years was performed to determine risk factors for revision surgery or conversion to THA. RESULTS We identified 3,957 patients. The mean age was 35.8 years (standard deviation, 13.1 years). After a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, the overall failure rate was 9.6%: 3.7% of patients underwent revision hip arthroscopy at an average of 15.8 months, whereas 5.9% underwent conversion to THA at 14.7 months. Index surgery performed by surgeons in the third tertile of surgical volume (<40 cases per annum) was an independent risk factor for revision (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; P = .001), as well as conversion to THA (OR, 1.90; P < .001). Female patients (OR, 1.8; P < .001), older patients (OR, 3.4; P < .001), and patients with a history of obesity (OR, 5.6; P < .001) underwent conversion to THA at significantly higher rates than other patients. Young patients (OR, 4.4; P < .001) and female patients (OR, 1.6; P < .001) were more likely to undergo revision hip arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis of 3,957 patients found that female sex, age under 40 years, absence of a labral repair, and index procedure performed by a low-volume surgeon were independent risk factors for revision hip arthroscopy. Age over 60 years, index procedure performed by a low-volume surgeon, female sex, obesity, and the presence of pre-existing arthritis were risk factors for THA conversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, case-control study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin S Kester
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Brian Capogna
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Siddharth A Mahure
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A..
| | - Michael K Ryan
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Brent Mollon
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Thomas Youm
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mahure SA, Rokito AS, Kwon YW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for postoperative pain relief after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective double-blinded randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26:1508-1513. [PMID: 28735847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Revised: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) can be associated with significant postoperative pain. Concern for opioid abuse has led surgeons to identify alternative, efficacious methods of postoperative analgesia. To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can have a similarly beneficial effect after shoulder procedures, we conducted a prospective double-blinded randomized trial in patients undergoing outpatient ARCR. METHODS All patients undergoing ARCR of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear by the senior authors were identified. Patients with a history of recent narcotic use or prior narcotic abuse and those under management of a pain control specialist were excluded. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, active or placebo TENS, and used the device for 4 sessions/day for 45 minutes/session for the first postoperative week. All patients received Percocet 5/325 mg (oxycodone/acetaminophen) for use as rescue pain pills. One-week narcotic consumption and visual analog scale pain scores were compared between groups. RESULTS The final analysis included 37 patients (21 active,16 placebo). Baseline and procedural differences were not different between groups. At 1 week postoperatively, patients in the active group had significantly lower pain scores (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 5.8 ± 1.2; P= .008). Postoperative Percocet consumption during the initial 48 hours (12.8 ± 4.7 vs. 17.2 ± 6.3; P = .020) and during the first week (25.2 ± 9.9 vs. 33.8 ± 14.3; P = .037) was also significantly lower in the active group. CONCLUSION Results from this prospective double-blinded randomized trial demonstrate that compared with placebo TENS, active TENS can result in significantly less pain and reduced opioid use in the immediate postoperative period after ARCR, suggesting that TENS may be potentially useful in a multimodal approach to managing postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew S Rokito
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Young W Kwon
- New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yoon RS, Mahure SA, Hutzler LH, Iorio R, Bosco JA. Hip Arthroplasty for Fracture vs Elective Care: One Bundle Does Not Fit All. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32:2353-2358. [PMID: 28366309 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To quantify how baseline differences in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for fracture vs elective care potentially lead to significant differences in immediate health care outcomes and whether these differences affect feasibility of current bundled payment models. METHODS New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database for the years 2000-2014. RESULTS A total of 76,654 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty between 2010 and 2014; 82.8% of the sample was for elective care and 17.2% for fracture-related etiology. Fracture patients were significantly older, more likely to be female, Caucasian, reimbursed by Medicare, and receive general anesthesia. Comorbidity burden and postoperative complications were significantly higher in the fracture group, and hospital charges were significantly greater for fracture patients as compared with those of the elective cohort. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for fracture care are significantly older and have more medical comorbidities than patients treated on an elective basis, leading to more in-hospital complications, greater length of stay, increased hospital costs, and significantly more hospital readmissions. The present bundled payment system, even with the recent modification, still unfairly penalizes hospitals that manage fracture patients and has the potential to incentivize hospitals to defer providing definitive surgical management for these patients. Future amendments to the bundled payment system should consider further separating hip arthroplasty patients based on etiology and comorbidities, allowing for a more accurate reflection of these distinct patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard S Yoon
- Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Siddharth A Mahure
- Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Lorraine H Hutzler
- Center for Quality and Patient Safety, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Richard Iorio
- Division of Adult Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Joseph A Bosco
- Center for Quality and Patient Safety, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Beirer M, Imhoff AB, Braun S. Arthroskopische subakromiale Dekompression in Kombination mit Rotatorenmanschettenrekonstruktionen. ARTHROSKOPIE 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00142-017-0140-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Mahure SA, Bosco JA, Slover JD, Vigdorchik JM, Iorio R, Schwarzkopf R. Coinfection with Hepatitis C and HIV Is a Risk Factor for Poor Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty. JB JS Open Access 2017; 2:e0009. [PMID: 30229221 PMCID: PMC6133098 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.oa.17.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As medical management continues to improve, orthopaedic surgeons are likely to encounter a greater proportion of patients who have coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis-C virus (HCV). Methods The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to identify patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty between 2010 and 2014. Patients were stratified into 4 groups on the basis of HCV and HIV status. Differences regarding baseline demographics, length of stay, total charges, discharge disposition, in-hospital complications and mortality, and 90-day hospital readmission were calculated. Results Between 2010 and 2014, a total of 137,801 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty. Of those, 99.13% (136,604) of the population were not infected, 0.62% (851) had HCV monoinfection, 0.20% (278) had HIV monoinfection, and 0.05% (68) were coinfected with both HCV and HIV. Coinfected patients were more likely to be younger, female, a member of a minority group, homeless, and insured by Medicare or Medicaid, and to have a history of substance abuse. HCV and HIV coinfection was a significant independent risk factor for increased length of hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 to 4.81), total hospital charges in the 90th percentile (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.67), ≥2 in-hospital complications (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.97), and 90-day hospital readmission (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 2.02 to 6.18). Conclusions Patients coinfected with both HCV and HIV represent a rare but increasing population of individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Recognition of unique baseline demographics in these patients that may lead to suboptimal outcomes will allow appropriate preoperative management and multidisciplinary coordination to reduce morbidity and mortality while containing costs. Level of Evidence Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph A Bosco
- Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - James D Slover
- Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Richard Iorio
- Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ran Schwarzkopf
- Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Editorial Commentary: Low Reoperation Rates for Outpatient Rotator Cuff Repairs: Proof of Efficacy? Arthroscopy 2016; 32:1542-3. [PMID: 27495860 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The reoperation rate for people younger than 65 years is approximately 8% at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The low rate is another indicator that outpatient rotator cuff repair is a good operation with acceptable failure risks.
Collapse
|