Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Knotless Suture Bridge Technique: Functional and Radiological Outcomes After a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years

Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Patients With Retear After Supraspinatus Tendon Repair and Those With Intact Repair at 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

It is well known that rotator cuff repair is associated with an overall retear rate of 21% to 26%. However, a cuff retear may not necessarily be associated with poor clinical outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be no difference in clinical outcomes between patients with a cuff retear and those with an intact repair at a midterm follow-up of 5 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted involving patients who received arthroscopic complete repair of the supraspinatus tendon between January 2009 and December 2017. Patients who did not have a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan or who had a follow-up of <5 years were excluded. Clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and active forward flexion (FF) of the involved shoulder were assessed at the 2-year and 5-year follow-up points.

RESULTS

The study group included 105 patients with a mean follow-up of 85 months. MRI scans were performed at a mean of 20 months. Fourteen full-thickness cuff retears and 91 intact repairs were identified using postoperative MRI scans. Significant improvement in VAS score, ASES score, and FF were found between the preoperative assessment and the 2 designated follow-up points (2 years and 5 years) in both the cuff retear and the intact repair groups (P < .001). The VAS and ASES scores at the 2-year follow-up for the intact repair group were 1.8 ± 2.0 and 80.7 ± 18.1, respectively. The corresponding values for the retear group were 2.3 ± 2.2 and 71.9 ± 19.5, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the VAS and ASES scores at the 2-year follow-up. However, patients with an intact repair had a better VAS score (1.4 ± 1.8; P = .049) and ASES score (81.7 ± 17; P = .019) than those with a cuff retear at the 5-year assessment (3.0 ± 2.8 and 67.1 ± 22.9, respectively). In the intact repair group, 91% of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference for the 5-year VAS score, compared with 54% in the cuff retear group (P < .001). The corresponding values for the 5-year ASES score were 80% and 54%, respectively (P = .044). FF measurements at the 5-year follow-up in patients with intact repair and those with a cuff retear were 161°± 23° and 144°± 37°, respectively (P = .059). Continuous improvement in VAS score and FF between the 2-year and 5-year follow-up was observed in the intact repair group (P = .005 and P = .04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The patients with an intact repair had better VAS and ASES scores compared with those who had a cuff retear at a midterm follow-up of 5 years. Between the 2-year and the 5-year follow-up, some further improvement was observed in the VAS score and FF in the intact repair group.

Comparison of cost, surgical time, and clinical results between arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair with lateral cortical augmentation and arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

To reduce the healthcare burden, the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and the cost of the implants used have recently been focused upon. This study compared implant cost, surgical time, short-term clinical results, and cuff repair integrity 2 years postoperatively between arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair using lateral cortical augmentation (TOA) and arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture bridge (TOE).

METHODS

This study included 220 patients with rotator cuff repairs performed by a single surgeon between December 2013 and December 2018. Overall, 70 TOA and 68 TOE cases met the inclusion criteria. The same surgeon performed the procedures at two different hospitals, and the techniques differed between the facilities. A total of 42 TOA patients were matched with 42 TOE patients. The patients were matched using a propensity score analysis by gender, age, and cuff tear size. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years. Implant cost and surgical time were compared between the two methods. The range of motion, clinical outcomes, and visual analog scale were evaluated. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to examine cuff repair integrity 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The follow-up rate was 81% (112/138 patients). Implant cost was significantly lower with TOA ($1,396 vs. $2,165; p < 0.001) than with TOE. The average surgical time in the TOA method was significantly shorter than that in the TOE method (82 vs. 109 min; p = 0.001). At a minimum 2-year follow-up, the mean active elevation, abduction, and clinical outcomes improved with both methods, although no improvements in external and internal rotations were observed with either method. There were no significant differences in the postoperative variables and retear rate (TOA, 12%; TOE, 19%; p = 0.548) between the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

TOA and TOE achieved comparable clinical results; however, TOA was more cost-effective and had a shorter surgical time than TOE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅲ, retrospective matched control study.

Knotted or knotless double-row rotator cuff repair retear rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair techniques used to rely on knot-tying double row techniques, but the advent of knotless transosseous equivalent procedures introduced a new variable to the debate. The purpose of this study is to determine which technique is associated with lower retear rates. For its' biomechanical advantages, the authors' hypothesis is that knotless techniques would have lower retear rates.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed via PubMed and Google Scholar by two independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Papers reporting retear rates after rotator cuff arthroscopic repair using knotted double-row or knotless transosseous equivalent techniques, evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after surgery, were retrieved. Studies that do not differentiate between techniques and nonclinical reports were excluded. Eligible data was analyzed with Review Manager 5.4.1 using Mantel-Haenszel statistics with a fixed effect model.

Results

The authors' initial literature search retrieved 511 reports. After the selection process, 24 articles were available for this review, and 9 were eligible for meta-analysis. A comparison of 1888 subjects from noncomparative reports and a meta-analysis of reports in which both techniques were studied could not show a statistically significant difference in technique retear rates.

Discussion and conclusion

The current report revealed no significant difference in retear rates between the two arthroscopic repair techniques. Studies' quality was a limitation. Only two reported level 1 evidence. This review could not control variables such as cuff tear size, tissue quality, or individual comorbidities. Larger and longer follow-up studies could be helpful to further investigate this topic.

Arthroscopic Double-Pulley Suture-Bridge Repair of Supraspinatus Tendon Tear

At present, the suture bridge is a widely used surgical pattern in the treatment of supraspinatus tendon tear, but the shortcomings of a suture bridge, including expensive lateral-row anchor and increased type 2 retear rate, is obvious. The double-pulley suture-bridge described in this Technical Note uses a double-loaded suture anchor (medial-row anchor) as lateral-row anchor instead of traditional lateral-row anchor, combined with double-pulley technology forming suture-bridge in treatment of supraspinatus tendon tears. The surgical technique is described in pearls, pitfalls, advantages, and disadvantages.

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Collagen Membrane Using a Knotless Suture Bridge Technique

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been covered by insurance in Japan since April 2013, expanding the range of treatments for extensive knee cartilage damage. Initially, the periosteum was used for the fixation of cultured cartilage, but since February 2019, the introduction of collagen membranes has shortened surgery time and simplified the procedure. We report a case where we used the knotless suture bridge technique for a more straightforward and secure fixation with a collagen membrane. The patient was a 61-year-old male who experienced right knee pain a year earlier when stepping downstairs. Conservative treatment at a local hospital was ineffective, and he was referred to our department. At the initial examination, the right knee had an extension of -5° and a flexion of 130°. A simple X-ray of the right knee showed osteosclerosis with a translucent bone image at the medial femoral condyle. Weight-bearing full-length X-ray of the lower limb showed a femorotibial angle (FTA) of 186°, a hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of 12.5° varus, a percentage of mechanical axis (%MA) of 15%, and a medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) of 78°, indicating a significant varus deformity. CT and MRI revealed a cartilage defect of 36 mm in length and 16 mm in width and a bone defect with a maximum depth of 15 mm at the medial femoral condyle. The patient underwent surgery for a traumatic cartilage defect of the medial femoral condyle. For the bone defect, autologous bone grafting was performed, and for the cartilage defect, ACI was done. The ACI involved fixation with a collagen membrane using 1.3 mm suture tape and BC PushLock anchor (Arthrex, Naples, Florida, United States) in a knotless suture bridge technique. Additionally, hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HCWHTO) was performed for alignment correction. At eight months post surgery, MRI proton density sagittal images confirmed the joint surface by the cartilage layer, and the Modified Outerbridge Cartilage Repair Assessment (MOCART) score was 80. At 12 months post surgery, the Japanese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (J-KOOS) improved from 46.43 to 82.14 for symptoms, 58.33 to 83.33 for pain, 95.59 to 100 for activities of daily living (ADL), 45 to 75 for sports, and 68.75 to 87.50 for quality of life (QOL). X-rays showed an FTA of 173°, an HKA of 0°, and a %MA of 58%, indicating a favorable course. The knotless suture bridge technique for collagen membrane fixation during ACI is considered a convenient and time-saving method.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair utilizing suture-bridge procedures with or without medial knots: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This investigation aimed to compare the medical efficacy of the knotted and knotless suture-bridge procedures in rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library datasets were searched for all available publications comparing the medical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs utilizing knotted or knotless suture-bridge procedures. Two researchers utilized Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to evaluate the included studies. Employing Revman 5.3 software, meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA reporting guideline.

RESULTS

Eleven investigations with 1083 patients were considered suitable for the final meta-analysis. 522 individuals were assigned to the knotted group, whereas 561 were assigned to the knotless group. No statistical difference was found between the knotted and knotless groups, regarding VAS score (WMD, 0.17; 95% CI, - 0.10 to 0.44; P = 0.21); Constant score (WMD, -1.50; 95% CI, - 3.52 to 0.52; P = 0.14); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (WMD, -2.02; 95% CI, - 4.53 to 0.49; P = 0.11); University of California Los Angeles score (WMD, -0.13; 95% CI, - 0.89 to 0.63; P = 0.73); ROM of flexion (WMD, 1.57; 95% CI, - 2.11 to 5.60; P = 0.37), abduction (WMD, 1.08; 95% CI, - 4.53 to 6.70; P = 0.71) and external rotation (WMD, 1.90; 95% CI, - 1.36 to 5.16; P = 0.25); re-tear rate (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.08; P = 0.12), and medical complications (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.37 to 2.20; P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

For arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, there were no statistical differences in medical results among knotted and knotless suture-bridge procedures. Overall, both techniques showed excellent clinical outcomes and could be safely utilized to treat rotator cuff injuries.

The Effect of PRP Augmentation of Arthroscopic Repairs of Shoulder Rotator Cuff Tears on Postoperative Clinical Scores and Retear Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to assess recent clinical trials concerning the combination of operative treatment of rotator cuff tears and the administration of PRP and its effect on clinical scores and postoperative retear rates. The trials were used to compare the combination of PRP treatment and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to arthroscopy alone. Twenty-five clinical trials were reviewed. A risk-of-bias assessment was made for all randomized clinical trials included, using the Cochrane collaboration’s tool as well as a quality assessment for all non-randomized studies utilizing the Newcastle−Ottawa scale. The PRP-treated patients showed statistically significant improvement postoperatively compared to control groups concerning the Constant−Murley (mean difference 2.46, 95% CI 1.4−3.52, p < 0.00001), SST (mean difference 0.32, 95% CI 0.02−0.63, p = 0.04), and UCLA (mean difference 0.82, 95% CI 0.23−1.43, p = 0.07) scores. A statistically significant decrease of retear rates in the PRP-treated patients, with a risk ratio of 0.78 (95% CI 0.65−0.94, p = 0.01), was found. We believe that the results presented have positive aspects, especially concerning the retear risk, but are yet inconclusive concerning clinical results such as shoulder pain and function.

Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of the Arthroscopic Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears Using the Modified Suture Bridge Technique

Objective  To evaluate the postoperative clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff injuries using a suture configuration we have developed based on a modification of the Suture Bridge (Arthrex, Naples, FL, United States). Methods  A retrospective study with 28 male (41.2%) and 40 female (58.8%) subjects with a mean age of 60 years. All patients underwent rotator cuff repair with the modified Suture Bridge technique and follow-up for a minimum period of 18 months. The clinical assessment was performed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Score. Results  The mean postoperative range of motion was of 134° (range: 110° to 140°) for elevation, 58° (range: 40° to 70°) for lateral rotation, and T10 (range: L4 to T7) for medial rotation. The mean increase was of 15° for elevation, 14° for lateral rotation, and 2 vertebral levels for medial rotation. The outcomes were excellent in 61 (83.6%) cases, good in 8 (10.9%), and regular in 4 cases (5.5%). Conclusion  The modified Suture Bridge technique for the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff injuries led to excellent or good postoperative clinical outcomes in most cases (69; 94.5%).

Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Functional Outcome Deterioration Over Time

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of retear on long-term functional outcomes and glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (OA) progression after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ASRCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 201 patients who underwent ASRCR and were followed up for at least 5 years. Rotator cuff tendon structural integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and/or ultrasonography. Pain, active range of motion, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) were evaluated for functional outcomes. To evaluate deterioration over time, the minimal clinically important difference value of pain and ASES were used.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 8.6 ± 2.2 years and overall retear rate was 21.4%. OA progression was strongly associated with retear (odds ratio 5.1, P < .001). Functional outcomes at the 2-year postoperative follow-up significantly improved compared to the preoperative status (all P < .017), regardless of retear. However, the retear group presented worse functional outcomes at the final follow-up (pain: 3.1 ± 2.6; ASES: 72.0 ± 17.4) than at the 2-year postoperative follow-up (pain: 1.2 ± 2.3, P = .014; ASES: 91.1 ± 9.9, P= .015) than the healed tendon group at final follow-up (pain: .6 ± 1.7; P < .001; ASES 95.5 ± 11.8; P < .001). The time for deterioration of pain (healed group vs. retear group: 5.5 ± 0.5 vs. 10.6 ± 0.4 years; P < .001) and ASES (healed group vs. retear group: 7.5 ± 0.5 vs. 12.8 ± 0.2 years; P < .001) decreased in the retear group.

CONCLUSIONS

The functional status improved after ASRCR in short- and long-term follow-up, regardless of retear. However, retear was strongly associated with OA progression, and long-term functional outcomes deteriorated over time in retear cases, which was not observed during short-term follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

III, retrospective cohort study.

Treatment of inferior pole patella fracture using Krackow suturing combined with the suture bridge technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical effect of Krackow suturing combined with the suture bridge technique for the treatment of acute inferior pole patella fracture.

METHODS

In this study, 18 patients with acute inferior pole patella fracture who received treatment using Krackow suturing combined with the suture bridge technique between January 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 10 men and 8 women, with an average age of 50.1 years (range 24-69 years). X-ray examinations were performed to assess fracture healing and the Insall-Salvati index. The clinical effect was measured by the range of motion of the knee joint and the Böstman scale.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 13-26 months, with an average follow-up period of 19.6 months. X-ray indicated that fracture union had occurred in all patients by 10.1 weeks after surgery on average (range 8-14 weeks). The mean Insall-Salvati index immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up was 0.98 ± 0.07 and 0.90 ± 0.22, respectively (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the mean flexion and extension ranges for the knee joint were 135.8° ± 8.8° and - 2.8° ± 3.9°, respectively, and the mean Böstman scale was 28.9 ± 1.1 points. Functional recovery was excellent in 17 patients and good in one patient, resulting in an overall good/excellent recovery rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that Krackow suturing combined with the suture bridge technique can achieve stable fracture fixation, provides good clinical outcomes in the treatment of acute inferior pole patella fracture, and is worthy of clinical application.

A Simple Technique to Restore Tension of a Loose Suture Bridge During Rotator Cuff Repair: Save the Repair

The transosseous equivalent suture bridge technique has been widely used for rotator cuff repair, especially for large tears. During the fixation of the second lateral anchor, the first group of sutures may become loose due to anchor malposition or manual overtensioning of the second group of sutures. To restore the suture's tension, a spare suture from the second lateral anchor may be passed beneath the loose suture to tighten it with a simple knot. This technique has been shown to be easy and fast to perform and does not require extra material.

The "Greenhouse" Technique Using Knotless Single-Row Suture Bridge Combined With Bone Marrow Stimulation for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears

To simplify the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique and improve tendon healing, we have developed a method named the "Greenhouse" technique to repair rotator cuff. With bone marrow stimulation combined with knotless single-row suture bridge fixation, we provide a technique for reliable cuff fixation with enhanced biological features.

Modified double-pulley suture-bridge techniques with or without medial knot tying show comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE

The optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare modified arthroscopic double-pulley suture-bridge (DPSB) technique with medial knot tying to those without tying, considering clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

This study included 292 patients with large full-thickness rotator cuff tears treated with modified DPSB technique. The patients were divided into 158 cases with medial knot tying (knot-tying group) and 134 without tying (knotless group). At follow-up, clinical outcome was assessed by the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score. The assessment of tendon healing was performed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The Constant score, ASES score and UCLA score in the knot-tying and knotless groups all improved significantly from before surgery to 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05, respectively). No significant differences were observed between groups for each phase evaluated (n.s.). Tendon healing was categorised according to Sugaya's classification. The retearing rate was 27/158 (17.0%) in the knot-tying group and 20/134 (14.9%) in the knotless group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (n.s.). Additionally, the retear was classified using the Cho's classification. When comparing the retear rates of different types independently, no statistically significant differences were found between groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

The knotless modified DPSB technique showed comparable short-term functional outcomes to those of the knot tying method in large full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Additionally, no significant differences in repair integrity were observed between the two methods. Both techniques can be considered effective treatments for patients with large-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Triple-Row Technique Confers a Lower Retear Rate Than Standard Suture Bridge Technique in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs

PURPOSE

To compare the structural and clinical results between the knotless suture bridge (SB) and triple-row (TR) techniques.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective study and included 212 shoulders with repairable rotator cuff tears treated with the SB technique and 206 shoulders treated with the TR technique. In the TR technique, medial and lateral anchors were placed as they would be for the SB technique, with a middle row anchor added on the edge of footprint to reduce the torn tendons. All patients underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and had magnetic resonance imaging 6 months postoperatively to evaluate for retear. Sugaya's classification was used to classify the retear pattern. The function of all patients preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively were assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder index and the University of California at Los Angeles rating scale.

RESULTS

According to Sugaya's classification, 24 (11.3%), 6 (2.8%), and 20 (9.4%) in SB-treated shoulders and 16 (7.8%), 12 (5.8%), and 8 (3.9%) in TR-treated shoulders, respectively had types 3, 4, and 5. There was a statistically significant greater type 5 retear in SB-treated shoulders (P = .038) than in TR-treated shoulders. The average clinical outcome scores at the final follow-up improved significantly relative to those before the surgeries in both groups. There were no statistical differences in the clinical outcome scores at the final follow-up between SB and TR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the TR technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair resulted in a lower large-size retear rate when compared with the use of the SB technique. No clinical differences were noted in the outcomes between the 2 groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic, retrospective cohort study.

SPSS Analysis of Pain Factors in Rotator Cuff Repair

In this study, the matched case-control study was used. Nineteen cases of severe pain in the early postoperative period among 55 patients were set as the observation group, and 57 cases of simultaneous rotator cuff repair without severe pain were matched in a 1 : 3 ratio as the control group. Patients’ general information, disease characteristics, anesthesia and analgesia scheme, and operation information were collected. Frequency statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, regulatory effect analysis, and Poisson regression analysis were performed on these data. Some findings are included in the analysis. (1) There was a markable difference of 0.01 between the preoperative 48 h maximum pain value and the postoperative 48 h maximum pain value in the observation group. (2) There was a markable difference of 0.01 between the size and shape of the wound tear and the maximum pain value at 48 h after operation in the observation group. (3) When the number of opioid use affected the maximum pain value at 48 h after operation, the regulatory variables (type, quantity, and number of days of postoperative analgesics) were at different levels, and the impact amplitude had markable differences. (4) Age has a markable negative impact on the postoperative hospital stay. (5) The operation duration has a markable positive relationship with the postoperative hospital stay. (6) The analgesic pump had a markable positive impact on the postoperative hospital stay. (7) The location of injury did not affect the postoperative hospital stay.

Arthroscopic knotless repair: an effective technique for small-sized supraspinatus tendon tears

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of knotless repair with flat-braided suture in full small-sized supraspinatus tendon tears (< 1 cm).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 54 patients with isolated small supraspinatus tendon tear (< 1 cm and Goutallier index < 2) was evaluated in the study. Patients underwent a knotless arthroscopic repair using flat-braided suture (2 mm wide). Minimal follow-up required was 5 years. Changes in Murley-Constant score, ASES score, strength, and pain relief were assessed. The Sugaya score was used to confirm the tendon repair on MRI. Data were analyzed in two subgroups: technique with additional U point for dog ear deformity (group 1) and technique without additional U point (group 2). The immobilization period was 3 weeks long. Passive mobilization was immediate.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included. Mean age was 57 ± 4 years. The average follow-up was 68 ± 10 months. Average preoperative score of Constant was 51.2 ± 8.5 and 83.1 ± 14.6 at the end of the follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean VAS went from 5.8 ± 1.8 to 1.9 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001). Average forward elevation of the shoulder went from 86.3° ± 9 preoperatively to 169.6° ± 15.9 at the end of the follow-up (p < 0.001). The strength score was significantly higher post-operatively (18.4 vs. 8.3, p < 0.001.). The ASES score was significantly improved 49.1 ± 13.1 vs. 88.6 ± 15.8, p < 0.001). The MRI assessment revealed 94% of Sugaya 1-2. No significant difference was observed between group 1 and 2 regarding all clinical outcomes. Two complex regional pain syndromes were described with a favorable evolution. Three patients presented a retear requiring an iterative arthroscopic repair.

CONCLUSION

The use of a knotless arthroscopic construct with flat-braided suture for small supraspinatus repair achieved excellent structural and clinical results. This technique is fully adequate for the arthroscopic treatment of such tears, enabling early mobilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Greater Tuberosity Bone Mineral Density and Rotator Cuff Tear Size Are Independent Factors Associated With Cutting-Through in Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the correlation between cutting-through at the greater tuberosity (GT) in arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair and the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, hip, and ipsilateral GT of the proximal humerus and to evaluate factors and clinical outcomes related to cutting-through.

METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled patients who underwent arthroscopic knotted suture-bridge rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears between June 2014 and October 2015 and who had undergone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry cans within 1 month before surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Cutting-through was defined as the occurrence of cortical breakage of the GT just medial to the lateral knotless anchor hole due to the tension of the sutures from the medial anchor, and it was assessed. Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed. Univariate and regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors related to cutting-through.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who had cutting-through (46, group I) and patients who did not (32, group II). In an analysis of lumbar spine, hip, and GT BMD, GT BMD was the most effective for predicting cutting-through (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.99). GT BMD (P < .001) and tear size (P = .004) were independent factors for cutting-through. Although a significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, lumbar spine and hip BMD, fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, and atrophy of the supraspinatus, these variables were not independent factors. Clinical and structural outcomes showed no significant difference between the 2 groups, and anchor failure was not identified intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

GT BMD and rotator cuff tear size are independent factors associated with cutting-through at the GT. A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan of the proximal humerus is useful for predicting bone quality before arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Prospective cohort study.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Modern rotator cuff repair techniques demonstrate favorable early and midterm outcomes, but long-term results have yet to be reported.

PURPOSE

To determine 10-year outcomes and survivorship after arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence 4.

METHODS

The primary TOE rotator cuff repair procedure was performed using either a knotted suture bridge or knotless tape bridge technique on a series of patients with 1 to 3 tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus. Only patients who were 10 years postsurgery were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Failure was defined as progression to revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 91 shoulders (56 men, 31 women) were included between October 2005 and December 2009. Mean follow-up was 11.5 years (range, 10.0-14.1 years). Of 91 shoulders, 5 (5.5%) failed and required revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes for patients who survived were known for 80% (69/86). Outcomes scores at final follow-up were as follows: ASES, 93.1 ± 10.8; SANE, 87.5 ± 14.2; QuickDASH, 11.1 ± 13.5; and SF-12 physical component summary (PCS), 49.2 ± 10.1. There were statistically significant declines in ASES, SANE, and SF-12 PCS from the 5-year to 10-year follow-up, but none of these changes met the minimally clinically important difference threshold. Median satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 (range, 3-10). From this cohort, Kaplan-Meier survivorship demonstrated a 94.4% survival rate at a minimum of 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic TOE rotator cuff repair demonstrates high patient satisfaction and low revision rates at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years. This information may be directly utilized in surgical decision making and preoperative patient counseling regarding the longevity of modern double-row rotator cuff repair.

Long-term prognoses of patients with and without re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

[Purpose] We followed-up patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for 2 years to assess the prognosis of rotator cuff tears and compared the outcomes of the patients with and without re-rupture. We also examined the usefulness of Shoulder36, a self-assessment tool, for assessing the long-term prognosis in patients undergoing ARCR. [Participants and Methods] We included 28 patients who received occupational therapy pre- and post-ARCR between April 2012 and August 2015 and categorized them based on the occurrence of re-rupture. We followed-up on their prognoses for 2 years using physical examination and Shoulder36 assessment. [Results] Re-rupture occurred in five patients within 3 months of treatment. During the 2 year follow-up, the control group showed a significant improvement in pain and bi-directional active range of motion during physical assessment and in five out of six domains during Shoulder36 assessment. In contrast, the re-rupture group showed significant differences for only three domains of the Shoulder36 assessment twelve months after surgery. [Conclusion] We confirmed the long-term functional improvement and maintenance in the re-rupture group, suggesting that continued rehabilitation, compensatory movements, and detailed guidance on daily life activities are required for patients after ARCR. Furthermore, Shoulder36 can be useful for assessing the prognosis of patients with and without re-rupture.

Arthroscopic release combined with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation in patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear and adhesive capsulitis non-responsive to conservative management: A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

There are few previous studies on traumatic supraspinatus tear with adhesive capsulitis. This study used arthroscopic release with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation to treat adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with rotator cuff tears. Further, the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic release with single-row fixation and double-row suture bridge fixation was compared.

HYPOTHESES

Arthroscopic release combined with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation showed good clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear with adhesive capsulitis.

METHODS

A single-center prospective randomized trial was performed from June 2013 to June 2017. Of the 68 patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear and adhesive capsulitis who underwent arthroscopic release, 34 (22 with tear measuring≤3cm and 12 with tear measuring>3cm) were included in the single-row fixation group and 34 (20 with tear measuring≤3cm and 14 with tear measuring>3cm) were included in the double-row suture bridge fixation group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder scores, range of motion, time to achieve satisfactory scores, and rotator cuff re-tear rate were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The range of motion, VAS score, UCLA and ASES shoulder scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups. There was a significant difference in the UCLA and ASES shoulder scores, time to achieve satisfactory scores, and rotator cuff re-tear rates in patients with tears measuring>3cm between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic release combined with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation showed good clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear with adhesive capsulitis. Therefore, the capsule of the shoulder should be thoroughly released to achieve such outcomes. For patients with rotator cuff tears measuring>3cm, double-row suture bridge fixation was superior to single-row fixation and the rotator cuff re-tear rate was low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; prospective, randomized trial, treatment study.

Arthroscopic Linked Triple Row Repair for Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Recently, many arthroscopic techniques have been described to improve the outcomes in rotator cuff repair of large and massive tears; these include conventional double-row, suture bridge, and triple-row techniques, in an effort to optimally reconstruct the rotator cuff footprint and improve fixation. This report describes a modified triple-row repair technique that links the double-row and suture-bridge techniques in one construct, merging the advantages of both to maximize the footprint contact area and contact pressure, which may lead to better healing and faster rehabilitation.

Long-term prognoses of patients with and without re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

[Purpose] We followed-up patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for 2 years to assess the prognosis of rotator cuff tears and compared the outcomes of the patients with and without re-rupture. We also examined the usefulness of Shoulder36, a self-assessment tool, for assessing the long-term prognosis in patients undergoing ARCR. [Participants and Methods] We included 28 patients who received occupational therapy pre- and post-ARCR between April 2012 and August 2015 and categorized them based on the occurrence of re-rupture. We followed-up on their prognoses for 2 years using physical examination and Shoulder36 assessment. [Results] Re-rupture occurred in five patients within 3 months of treatment. During the 2 year follow-up, the control group showed a significant improvement in pain and bi-directional active range of motion during physical assessment and in five out of six domains during Shoulder36 assessment. In contrast, the re-rupture group showed significant differences for only three domains of the Shoulder36 assessment twelve months after surgery. [Conclusion] We confirmed the long-term functional improvement and maintenance in the re-rupture group, suggesting that continued rehabilitation, compensatory movements, and detailed guidance on daily life activities are required for patients after ARCR. Furthermore, Shoulder36 can be useful for assessing the prognosis of patients with and without re-rupture.

Linked Double-Row Equivalent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Leads to Significantly Improved Patient Outcomes

Background:

Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a linked double-row equivalent construct results in significantly higher load to failure compared with conventional transosseous-equivalent constructs.

Purpose:

To determine the patient-reported outcomes (PROs), reoperation rates, and complication rates after linked double-row equivalent rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Consecutive patients who underwent linked double-row equivalent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS), reoperations, and complications. Clinical relevance was defined by the minimally clinically important difference (MCID). Comparisons on an individual level that exceeded MCID (individual-level scores) were deemed clinically relevant. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative scores were completed using the Student t test. All P values were reported with significance set at P < .05.

Results:

A total of 42 shoulders in 41 consecutive patients were included in this study (21 male patients [51.2%]; mean age, 64.5 ± 11.9 years; mean follow-up, 29.7 ± 4.5 months). All patients (100%) completed the minimum 2-year follow-up. The rotator cuff tear measured on average 15.2 ± 8.9 mm in the coronal plane and 14.6 ± 9.8 mm in the sagittal plane. The ASES score improved significantly from 35.5 ± 18.2 preoperatively to 93.4 ± 10.6 postoperatively (P < .001). The QuickDASH (P < .001), SST (P < .001), and VAS (P < .001) scores also significantly improved after surgery. All patients (42/42 shoulders; 100%) achieved clinically relevant improvement (met or exceeded MCID) on ASES and SST scores postoperatively. There were no postoperative complications (0.0%) or reoperations (0.0%) at final follow-up.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with the linked double-row equivalent construct results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in PRO scores with low complication rates (0.0%) and reoperation rates (0.0%) at short-term follow-up.

Prospective Analysis of Arthroscopic Hip Anatomic Labral Repair Utilizing Knotless Suture Anchor Technology: The Controlled-Tension Anatomic Technique at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Labral tears are the most common abnormalities in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Appropriate management is crucial, as it has been shown that better overall outcomes can be achieved with labral restoration.

PURPOSE

To report the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at minimum 2-year follow-up of patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected for patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique. Patients were excluded if they had prior hip conditions, prior ipsilateral surgery, Tönnis grade >1, a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25°, or workers' compensation claims. Preoperative and postoperative scores at minimum 2-year follow-up were recorded for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the mHHS, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12 were also reported.

RESULTS

A total of 309 hips were included. The mean patient age was 36.2 years (range, 12.8-75.9 years). The mean preoperative LCEA and alpha angle were 31.9° and 57.1°, respectively. A significant improvement on the mHHS (62.6 ± 15.7 preoperatively vs 86.9 ± 16.2 at 2-year follow-up), NAHS (63.1 ± 16.7 vs 86.1 ± 16.7), and HOS-SSS (39.8 ± 22.0 vs 74.2 ± 27.3) was found (P < .001 for all). A significant decrease was shown for VAS scores (P < .001). Also, 78.6% and 82.2% of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for the mHHS, respectively; 60.8% and 69.9% of patients met the MCID and PASS for the HOS-SSS, respectively; and the MCID for the iHOT-12 was met by 77.3% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of FAIS and labral tears, patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique demonstrated significant improvement in several validated PRO measures, the VAS pain score, and patient satisfaction at a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Based on this evidence, labral tear repair using the knotless controlled-tension anatomic technique seems to be a safe option.

Factors influencing operative time in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparison of knotless single-row vs. transosseous equivalent dual-row techniques

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR), there remains considerable debate on the benefits of a dual-row vs. a single-row (SR) repair technique. This study compares operative time of a knotless SR technique with transosseous equivalent (TOE) dual-row technique for aRCR and defines patient-specific factors that affect operative time.

METHODS

Data from 118 patients who underwent aRCR with a knotless SR technique was compared with data from 95 patients who underwent aRCR with a TOE technique by a single surgeon between 2014 and 2018. Baseline patient demographic information and operative time were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if demographic information or tear size influenced operative time.

RESULTS

The average operative time in the SR group was 75.68 minutes and the average operative time in the TOE group was 89.24 minutes (P < .001). When controlling for all concomitant procedures, the operative time in the TOE group was 8.1 minutes longer than the SR group (P = .029). Average tear size in an anterior-posterior direction was larger in the TOE group vs. the SR group, 26.09 mm vs. 15.18 mm (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

When controlling for concomitant procedures, a knotless, TOE dual-row technique for aRCR adds an average of 8 minutes' operative time compared with a knotless SR technique. This was despite a significantly larger tear size in the TOE group.

Editorial Commentary: Who Needs Knots Anyway?

The arthroscopic knotless suture bridge technique is a common procedure used for rotator cuff repair. The ease of use, the versatility of this type of repair for most tears, and good outcomes make it a must for orthopaedic surgeons to have in their clinical toolbox.