Laparoscopic procurement of single versus multiple artery kidney allografts: Meta-analysis of comparative studies

The early outcomes of two separate anastomosis procedures in deceased kidney transplantation with double arteries: A retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Kidneys with double renal arteries are used on a routine basis nowadays, and separate anastomosis in situ is one of the suitable arterial anastomosis procedures. The commonly used methods are parallel end-to-side anastomoses of double arteries to the external iliac artery, and end-to-end anastomosis to the internal iliac artery combined with end-to-side anastomosis to the external iliac artery. No studies have compared the prognoses of the two procedures in deceased kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 35 consecutive deceased kidney transplantations with double arterial anastomoses in the urology department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from January 2018 to April 2021. Group I comprised recipients with double parallel end-to-side anastomoses to the external iliac artery; Group II comprised the others. Their prognoses were then compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between Group I and II in characteristics of recipients and donors. The mean eGFRs at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-transplant in Group I and II were 36.4 vs 54.1 (P = 0.009), 40.4 vs 54.4 (P = 0.02), 40.4 vs 56.9 (P = 0.02) and 39.8 vs 57.9 (P = 0.007) mL/min respectively. There was no difference in early postoperative complications and 1-year survival rates between the two groups (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Separate anastomosis is a reliable procedure for deceased kidney transplantation with double arteries. Double separate anastomoses to the external and internal iliac arteries have better graft function compared with double parallel anastomoses to the external iliac artery during the first year after transplantation.

Single versus multiple renal arteries in living donor kidney transplantation: A systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Grafts with multiple renal arteries (MRAs) were historically considered a relative contraindication to transplantation due to the higher risk of vascular and urologic complications. This study aimed to evaluate graft and patient survival between single renal artery (SRA) and MRA living-donor kidney transplants.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus for prospective or retrospective studies comparing SRA versus MRA in living donor renal transplantation, with the provision of Kaplan-Meier curves for recipient overall survival (OS) or graft survival (GS). A graphical reconstructive algorithm was used to obtain OS and GS of individual patients, which was then pooled under random-effects individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis using Cox-models to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-regression of baseline covariates versus HRs of OS and GS was performed for variables reported in 10 or more studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were retrieved, of which 13 (8400 patients) reported OS and 9 (6912 patients) reported GS. There were no significant differences in OS (shared-frailty HR = .94, 95%CI = .85-1.03, p = .172) or GS (shared-frailty HR = .95, 95%CI = .83-1.08, p = .419) between SRA and MRA. This comparison remained non-significant even when restricted to open- or laparoscopic-only studies. Meta-regression yielded no significant associations of GS with donor age, recipient age, and percentage of double renal arteries within the MRA arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar rates of GS and OS between MRA and SRA grafts suggest that there is no need for discrimination between the two when evaluating donors for nephrectomy.

Frailty in kidney transplant candidates and recipients: pathogenesis and intervention strategies

ABSTRACT

With the rapid aging of the global population posing a serious problem, frailty, a non-specific state that reflects physiological senescence rather than aging in time, has become more widely addressed by researchers in various medical fields. A high prevalence of frailty is found among kidney transplant (KT) candidates and recipients. Therefore, their frailty has become a research hotspot in the field of transplantation. However, current studies mainly focus on the cross-sectional survey of the incidence of frailty among KT candidates and recipients and the relationship between frailty and transplantation. Research on the pathogenesis and intervention is scattered, and relevant review literature is scarce. Exploring the pathogenesis of frailty in KT candidates and recipients and determining effective intervention measures may reduce waiting list mortality and improve the long-term quality of life of KT recipients. Therefore, this review explains the pathogenesis and intervention measures for frailty in KT candidates and recipients to provide a reference for the formulation of effective intervention strategies.

Risk aversion in the use of complex kidneys in paired exchange programs: Opportunities for even more transplants?

This retrospective review of the largest United States kidney exchange reports characteristics, utilization, and recipient outcomes of kidneys with simple compared to complex anatomy and extrapolates reluctance to accept these kidneys. Of 3105 transplants performed, only 12.8% were right kidneys and 23.1% had multiple renal arteries. 59.3% of centers used fewer right kidneys than expected and 12.1% transplanted zero right kidneys or kidneys with more than 1 artery. Five centers transplanted a third of these kidneys (35.8% of right kidneys and 36.7% of kidneys with multiple renal arteries). 22.5% and 25.5% of centers currently will not entertain a match offer for a left or right kidney with more than one artery, respectively. There were no significant differences in all-cause graft failure or death-censored graft loss for kidneys with multiple arteries, and a very small increased risk of graft failure for right kidneys versus left of limited clinical relevance for most recipients. Kidneys with complex anatomy can be used with excellent outcomes at many centers. Variation in use (lack of demand) for these kidneys reduces the number of transplants, so systems to facilitate use could increase demand. We cannot know how many donors are turned away because perceived demand is limited.

Safety and Intraoperative Results in Live Kidney Donors with Vascular Multiplicity After Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy Living Donor Nephrectomy

Background and Purpose

Vascular multiplicity is the most frequent anatomic variation in kidney donors. Despite concerns about risks, these allografts are increasingly used to overcome the shortage of kidney donors. The safety and clinical outcomes in living kidney donors were evaluated with vascular multiplicity after hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HALDN).

Patients and Methods

Data from all living kidney donors who underwent HALDN from 2008 to 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups as single (SRV) and multiple renal vessels (MRV), and a comparative analysis was done. The primary outcomes include operating room time (ORT), days of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, complications, conversion, and re-operations.

Results

MRV were present in 166 out of 612 donors (27.1%). Among those, 10 (1.6%) donors had simultaneous multiple arteries and veins. Additionally, the prevalence of artery and vein multiplicity was 21.8% (n = 134) and 3.5% (n = 22), respectively. Warm ischemia time was significantly different among the two groups but not clinically important. The number of conversions to open technique, the mean ORT, the median blood loss, and days of hospital stay were similar between the SRV and MRV groups, without significant differences. According to the modified Clavien-classification system, no differences were found in the complication rates between the two groups (p = 0.29). Complication rates were 3.3% and 3.6% for the SRV and MRV groups, respectively.

Conclusion

HALDN is a procedure with safe intraoperative results, even with vascular multiplicity. The presence of multiple renal arteries or veins has no negative impact on the outcome of the donor after living donor nephrectomy.

Reconstruction of a Lower Polar Artery for Kidney Transplantation Using Donor Ovarian Vein: Case Report with Literature Review

Background: In the case of complicated kidney transplantation, when the accessory artery is severed, the main task is to decide whether to restore renal blood flow and which method should be used. In this report, we present a case of kidney transplantation with vascular reconstruction using an ovarian vein as an interposition graft between a larger branch of the main renal artery and the lower polar artery which was severed during kidney explantation. Case summary: Kidney transplantation using an ovarian vein was performed for a 34-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease on 1 April 2020 in the Hospital of Lithuanian university of health sciences (LUHS) Kaunas Clinics. A lower accessory renal artery was severed during kidney explantation. As the ovarian vein of the donor remained and matched the diameter of the severed vessel, it was decided to use it as an insertion between the main renal artery and the accessory renal artery of the inferior pole. The cold ischemic time was 770 min and the warm ischemic time was 37 min. A month after transplantation, the patient's condition and daily urine output were normal and the serum creatinine level decreased rapidly. Fifteen months after the surgery, the function and structure of the transplant remained normal and there was no evidence of serious vascular complications on CT scans. This is the first case where graft function was verified after transplantation using three-dimensional CT angiography. Conclusions: If an inferior polar artery is severed, vascular reconstruction must be performed to preserve the function of the graft. Usually, the gonadal vein is available during donor nephrectomy; therefore, it can be explanted without additional difficulties or incisions. Although we have not reported any complications, further studies are recommended on the long-term outcomes of this alternative approach for the reconstruction of short renal arteries.

Procedure: Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

Minimally invasive approaches for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy are necessary to limit surgical morbidity, and technical challenges differ from those encountered during other laparoscopic renal surgeries. Presented here is a step-by-step guide for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy-focusing on pure laparoscopic and hand-assisted techniques. Both straight laparoscopic and hand-assisted nephrectomies were performed in healthy donors who met transplantation criteria in terms of global health and psychologic well-being. Patient positioning, trocar placement, surgical steps, incision closure, and postoperative care are reviewed. Standard equipment used to complete this procedure is itemized. This guide outlines indications, preoperative preparation, and procedural steps for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The techniques and the evolution thereof represent our experience since 2002 for 510 cases. The attached videos demonstrate a high-volume surgeon's typical approach while factoring in anatomical variation. In both cases, the donor nephrectomies were without incident and the patient's postoperative courses were without complication. A basic framework for donor nephrectomy is presented highlighting surgical steps we believe to be essential for graft preservation and ultimately effective transplantation. Although no two cases are the same, systematic approaches will allow for timely case completion, fewer complications, and better donor/recipient outcomes.

The impact of multiple donor renal arteries on perioperative complications and allograft survival in paediatric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The impact of using allografts with multiple renal arteries in paediatric kidney transplantation has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to determine whether kidney grafts with multiple arteries pose any adverse effects upon perioperative surgical outcomes, and graft survival up to 12 months post-transplant.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of a minimum of 12-month graft survival and transplant renal function in paediatric renal transplant recipients receiving single versus multiple donor arteries, and to assess perioperative and early post-operative surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective divisional chart review of 379 transplants performed (2000-2018), of which 90 (23.7%) contained multiple donor arteries. The number of arteries of the graft, donor type, vascular reconstruction technique, occurrence of urological and vascular complications, estimated GFR and graft survival up to 12 months post-transplantation, graft loss and mortality were analysed. Comparisons in baseline characteristics and outcome measures were made between both groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in age (p = 0.42), BMI (p = 0.39), estimated intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.14), overall (p = 0.63) or warm ischaemic time (p = 0.37). 51.3% patients with multiple donor arteries underwent an ex vivo reconstruction. There were no differences in the site of arterial anastomosis (aorta, external iliac, internal iliac), or anastomotic type (end-side; end-end). Whilst there was a significantly higher post-operative lymphocoele rate in the multiple vessel cohort (p = 0.024), there was no increase in post-transplant urine leaks, rejection episodes, graft loss (1.1% multiple vs 2.1% single), perioperative complications (p = 0.68), or estimated GFR at 1 month (p = 0.9) or at 1 year (p = 0.67).

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated in this study that there was no significant difference in postoperative complications up to 3 months, eGFR and renal function up to 1 year, and graft survival up to 4 years post transplantation irrespective of allograft type or reconstruction technique. There was however, a higher rate of lymphocoeles in the multiple artery cohort. The results seen here broadly mirror trends seen in adult studies, however, there is little data available from paediatric series.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that multiple renal artery allografts - previously been considered to carry a high complication risk - can be safely used for paediatric renal transplantation with equivalent perioperative complications and graft outcomes to single artery allografts.

The Impact of Living Donor Nephrectomy With Multiple Renal Arteries on Graft Function and Complications in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the early outcome of living donor kidney transplantation using allografts with a single artery and multiple arteries.

METHODS

From February 2018 to December 2019, a total of 62 patients underwent living donor nephrectomy at our institution: 20 multiple artery donor nephrectomies (MADNs) and 42 single artery donor nephrectomies (SADNs). All operations were performed by the same surgeon as the laparoscopic procedure. The MADN and SADN groups were compared regarding donor and recipient hospital stay, operative time, warm ischemia time, and postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo classification. Graft function was evaluated considering episodes of acute tubular necrosis during the first week, delayed graft function, serum creatinine (SCr), and glomerular filtration rate for 6 months after transplantation.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included in this study. There was no difference in terms of age, sex, body mass index, nephrectomy side, smoking status, preoperative SCr, or preoperative glomerular filtration rate between the 2 groups. Warm ischemia time and operation time were statistically significantly higher in the MADN group (P < .001 and P < .001). Regarding graft function, the prevalence of acute tubular necrosis did not differ between groups. There was also no significant difference in the acute rejection or mortality rates after transplantation. Although SCr levels were lower in multiple renal artery recipients, there was no statistical difference during the 6 months of follow-up. Recipient morbidity and mortality were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal allograft transplantation with multiple renal arteries can be performed with reasonable complications and acceptable results.

Clinical Outcomes Following Single vs. Multiple Vessel Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison of 210 Patients

Background: The use of living-donor kidney allografts with multiple vessels continues to rise in order to increase the donor pool. This requires surgeons to pursue vascular reconstructions more often, which has previously been associated with a higher risk of developing early post-transplant complications. We therefore wanted to investigate the prognostic role of using living-donor renal allografts with a single artery (SA) vs. multiple arteries (MA) at the time of transplant.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 210 consecutive living-donor kidney transplants performed between January, 2008 and March, 2019, and compared the incidence of developing postoperative complications and other clinical outcomes between SA vs. MA recipients.

Results: No differences were observed between SA (N = 161) and MA (N = 49) kidneys in terms of the incidence of developing a postoperative (or surgical) complication, a urologic complication, hospital length of stay, delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 or 12 mo post-transplant, and graft survival.

Conclusions: The use of live-kidney allografts with MA requiring vascular reconstruction shows excellent clinical outcomes and does not increase the risk of developing postoperative complications or other adverse outcomes when compared with SA renal allografts.

Predicting operation time and creating a difficulty scoring system in donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

To determine predictive formulas for operation time and surgical difficulty in laparoscopic living-donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data for 222 living donors aged > 20 years and recorded factors affecting operation time from patients' computed tomography images and medical records. We used the factors significantly affecting operation time to create a formula to predict operation time and designed a model to predict surgical difficulty based on the standardized partial regression coefficient, β. We also analyzed the relationship between surgical difficulty (high vs low) and operation time.

RESULTS

This study involved 111 pure retroperitoneal donor nephrectomies (PRDN) and 111 hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (HALDN). Patients' mean age was 55.7 years, and 59.5% were women; 5.0% underwent right nephrectomy, and 77.0% vs. 23.0% had single- vs. multiple renal arteries. The average estimated kidney graft weight was 160.0 g; actual average graft weight was 155.3 g. The following factors were significantly correlated with operation time in the regression analysis: number of renal arteries, Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, estimated kidney graft weight, right nephrectomy, and operation type (PRDN). These five factors were used to create the operation time prediction equation and difficulty scoring system. The multiple r2 value was 0.40 for the operation time prediction equation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the difficulty scoring system revealed the following: sensitivity: 78.0%, specificity: 64.9%, and c-statistic: 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The equation to predict operation time and the surgical difficulty prediction model created in this study are easy to calculate and are accurate. Both may help in selecting an appropriately-skilled surgeon and in improving safety in living-donor kidney transplantation.

Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background

The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs) with a diameter less than 2 mm because of increased risk of thrombosis related to their reconstruction. This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility and safety of reconstructing thin UPAs during living-donor kidney transplantation, with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the graft and assuring its maximal function.

Material/Methods

Data from 922 living-donor kidney transplants performed between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Six cases with UPAs were identified (0.65%). The study endpoints were incidence of allograft vascular and urologic complications, slow graft function, delayed graft function, graft failure, and graft and patient survival.

Results

The UPAs had a mean diameter of 1.8±0.28 mm. Methods of reconstruction included: interposition graft (n=2), end-to-side anastomosis inside the renal hilum to a branch of the main renal artery (n=3), and side-to-side anastomosis with the main renal artery (n=1). Additional reconstruction of LPAs (n=2) and main renal arteries (n=2) was performed. During a median (range) follow-up of 14.5 (9–49) months no complications were observed.

Conclusions

Ex vivo reconstruction of UPAs with a diameter less than 2 mm is worth attempting, particularly in the setting of living-donor kidney transplantation.

Correlation Between the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score and the Operative Time in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Adherent perinephric fat (APF) is a known risk factor of surgical difficulty during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score predicts APF accurately. The aim of this study is to identify the association between MAP score and operative time in LDN.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 154 kidney donors who underwent surgery from December 2017 to December 2019 at İstanbul Aydın University Hospital and İstinye University Hospital. All of the operations were done by 3 senior surgeons by a fully laparoscopic method. The MAP score was derived from computed tomography scans by 1 blinded reader. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), MAP score, side selection, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), number of arteries and veins, operative time, hospital stay, and complications are recorded. Single and multiple variable analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between operative time and MAP score, BMI, side selection, and number of vascular structures.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients (79 men, 75 women) with a mean age of 44.4 ± 12.72 were included in this study. None of the cases were converted to open nephrectomy. There were no major complications. Mean BMI was 27.59 ± 4.32 kg/m², mean MAP score was 0.69 ± 1.15, and mean operative time was 40.25 ± 9.81 minutes. Although mean BMI was higher in women (28.19 ± 4.52 vs 27.03 ± 4.07; P < .05), mean MAP score was lower than in men (0.35 ± 0.86 vs 1.03 ± 1.29; P < .001). Older age, higher BMI, higher MAP score, and presence of multiple renal arteries were associated with longer operative time of LDN. The MAP score was associated with older age, male sex and higher BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that different risk factors can affect operative time in LDN. The MAP score was significantly associated with longer operative time, especially in men, so it can be useful for predicting surgical difficulty in kidney donors.

Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation Using Grafts With Multiple Vessels: Comparison to Propensity Matched Contemporary Open Kidney Transplants Cohort

Introduction: The aim of the study was to report the perioperative and functional results of Robotic assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) in Grafts with multiple vessels (GMVs) and compare it to the results of Open kidney transplantation (OKT) with GMVs.

Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing RAKT from living donors using GMVs were reviewed from prospectively collected RAKT database at our institution between March 2013 and March 2018. Patient undergoing Open kidney transplantation (OKT) using GMVs served as controls. Ex-vivo bench surgical reconstruction of GMVs was done according to specific anatomy. Propensity score matching was used to balance the sample size in the two groups.

Results: Of 153 RAKT and OKT procedures, 86 cases were eligible for propensity score matching for the statistically significant variables (standardized difference >0.10) and 43 procedures were assigned to each group. Median anastomoses, total and cold ischemia and rewarming times did not differ significantly between the RAKT and OKT groups. In comparison with OKT in GMVs we found that RAKT with GMVs had less pain score on post op 2nd day (p = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in mean analgesic requirement (p = 0.02), hospital stay (p = 0.05) and incision length (p = 0.04). Most of the major, minor surgical, and medical postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups except for wound related events (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Multiplicity of renal vessels in RAKT does not adversely affect patient or graft survival compared with the OKT. Satisfactory functional outcome can be achieved by RAKT similar to OKT in GMVs. RAKT seems to have advantage over OKT in that it is less invasive and has the potential to cause fewer low grade complications. Small sample size and short follow-up are the main limitations of the study.

Comments on: Computed tomography evaluation of renal artery morphometry in adults. The impact of age and gender

[No Abstract Available].