1
|
Holden MA, Murphy M, Simkins J, Thomas MJ, Huckfield L, Quicke JG, Halliday N, Birrell FN, Borrelli B, Callaghan MJ, Dziedzic K, Felson D, Foster NE, Ingram C, Jinks C, Jowett S, Nicholls E, Peat G. Knee braces for knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of interventions in randomised controlled trials. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2024:S1063-4584(24)01365-7. [PMID: 39218202 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively. RESULTS Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological. CONCLUSIONS Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Holden
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - M Murphy
- The Robert Jones Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK.
| | - J Simkins
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - M J Thomas
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - L Huckfield
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - J G Quicke
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - N Halliday
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - F N Birrell
- MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing, Newcastle University, UK.
| | - B Borrelli
- Henry M Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA; Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - M J Callaghan
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK; Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - K Dziedzic
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - D Felson
- Research in OsteoArthritis Manchester (ROAM), Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - N E Foster
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - C Ingram
- Research User Group, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - C Jinks
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - S Jowett
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - E Nicholls
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - G Peat
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK; Centre for Applied Health & Social Care Research (CARe), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Hu C, Zhou K, Zhang Y, Kang J, Wen Y, Yuan R, Li J, Zhao Q, Zhang L, Yang X. The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) formulas for diabetes based on the consort statement and its extension for CHM formulas. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1288479. [PMID: 38318135 PMCID: PMC10839105 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1288479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the overall reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) formulas for patients with diabetes, and to identify factors associated with better reporting quality. Methods: Four databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were systematically searched from their inception to December 2022. The reporting quality was assessed based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and its CHM formula extension. The overall CONSORT and its CHM formula extension scores were calculated and expressed as proportions separately. We also analyzed the pre-specified study characteristics and performed exploratory regressions to determine their associations with the reporting quality. Results: Seventy-two RCTs were included. Overall reporting quality (mean adherence) were 53.56% and 45.71% on the CONSORT statement and its CHM formula extension, respectively. The strongest associations with reporting quality based on the CONSORT statement were multiple centers and larger author numbers. Compliance with the CHM formula extension, particularly regarding the disclosure of the targeted traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pattern (s), was generally insufficient. Conclusion: The reporting quality of RCTs in CHM formulas for diabetes remains unsatisfactory, and the adherence to the CHM formula extension is even poorer. In order to ensure transparent and standardized reporting of RCTs, it is essential to advocate for or even mandate adherence of the CONSORT statement and its CHM formula extension when reporting trials in CHM formulas for diabetes by both authors and editors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liu
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chaoyue Hu
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Kehua Zhou
- Department of Hospital Medicine, ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton, Appleton, WI, United States
| | - Ye Zhang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Kang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yalu Wen
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Ruyue Yuan
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaoyue Li
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Qiyao Zhao
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Yang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Svedin F, Blomberg O, Farrand P, Brantnell A, von Essen L, Åberg AC, Woodford J. Effectiveness, acceptability, and completeness and quality of intervention reporting of psychological interventions for people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077180. [PMID: 38086581 PMCID: PMC10729069 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mental health difficulties such as anxiety and depression have negative impacts on psychological well-being and are common in people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, access to psychological treatments is limited. This mixed-method systematic review will: (1) examine the effectiveness of psychological interventions to improve mental health and psychological well-being in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment; (2) examine the effectiveness of these psychological interventions to improve mental health and psychological well-being in informal caregivers; (3) examine potential clinical and methodological moderators associated with effectiveness; (4) explore factors associated with the acceptability of psychological interventions from the perspective of key stakeholders; and (5) examine the completeness and quality of intervention reporting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Electronic databases (ASSIA, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and MEDLINE) will be systematically searched and supplemented with expert contact, reference and citation checking, and grey literature searches. If possible, we will conduct a meta-analysis to examine the overall effectiveness of psychological interventions to improve mental health and psychological well-being in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and their informal caregivers; and examine potential clinical and methodological moderators associated with effectiveness. We will conduct a deductive framework synthesis, informed by the theoretical framework of acceptability, to explore factors associated with the acceptability of psychological interventions from the perspective of key stakeholders. In accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, we will adopt a convergent segregated approach to data synthesis and integration of quantitative and qualitative findings. We will examine the completeness and quality of intervention reporting according to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist and guide. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No primary data will be collected, and therefore, ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, academic conferences, and plain language summaries. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023400514.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frida Svedin
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Oscar Blomberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Paul Farrand
- Clinical Education Development and Research (CEDAR), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Anders Brantnell
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Louise von Essen
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Cristina Åberg
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Medical Sciences, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Joanne Woodford
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Regazzoni P, Jupiter JB, Liu WC, Fernández dell’Oca AA. Evidence-Based Surgery: What Can Intra-Operative Images Contribute? J Clin Med 2023; 12:6809. [PMID: 37959274 PMCID: PMC10649165 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine integrates results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses, combining the best external evidence with individual clinical expertise and patients' preferences. However, RCTs of surgery differ from those of medicine in that surgical performance is often assumed to be consistent. Yet, evaluating whether each surgery is performed to the same standard is quite challenging. As a primary issue, the novelty of this review is to emphasize-with a focus on orthopedic trauma-the advantage of having complete intra-operative image documentation, allowing the direct evaluation of the quality of the intra-operative technical performance. The absence of complete intra-operative image documentation leads to the inhomogeneity of case series, yielding inconsistent results due to the impossibility of a secondary analysis. Thus, comparisons and the reproduction of studies are difficult. Access to complete intra-operative image data in surgical RCTs allows not only secondary analysis but also comparisons with similar cases. Such complete data can be included in electronic papers. Offering these data to peers-in an accessible link-when presenting papers facilitates the selection process and improves publications for readers. Additionally, having access to the full set of image data for all presented cases serves as a rich resource for learning. It enables the reader to sift through the information and pinpoint the details that are most relevant to their individual needs, allowing them to potentially incorporate this knowledge into daily practice. A broad use of the concept of complete intra-operative image documentation is pivotal for bridging the gap between clinical research findings and real-world applications. Enhancing the quality of surgical RCTs would facilitate the equalization of evidence acquisition in both internal medicine and surgery. Joint effort by surgeons, scientific societies, publishers, and healthcare authorities is needed to support the ideas, implement economic requirements, and overcome the mental obstacles to its realization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Regazzoni
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jesse B. Jupiter
- Hand and Arm Center, Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Wen-Chih Liu
- Hand and Arm Center, Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
- Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
| | - Alberto A. Fernández dell’Oca
- Department of Traumatology, Hospital Britanico, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay;
- Residency Program in Traumatology and Orthopedics, University of Montevideo, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lišnić V, Ashraf H, Viđak M, Marušić A. Completeness of intervention description in invasive cardiology trials: an observational study of ClinicalTrials.gov registry and corresponding publications. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1276847. [PMID: 37881632 PMCID: PMC10597631 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1276847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Non-pharmacological invasive interventions in cardiology are complex and often inadequately reported. Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide were developed to aid reporting and assessment of non-pharmacological interventions. The aim of our study was to assess the completeness of describing invasive cardiology interventions in clinical trials at the level of trial registration and corresponding journal article publication. Methodology We searched for clinical trials in invasive cardiology registered in Clinicaltrials.gov and corresponding journal publications. We used the 10-item TIDieR checklist for registries and 12-item checklist for journal publications. Results Out of 7,017 registry items retrieved by our search, 301 items were included in the analysis. The search for corresponding published articles yielded 192 journal publications. The majority of trials were funded by the industry and were medical device trials. The median number of reported TIDieR items was 4.5 (95% CI 4.49-4.51) out of 10, and while the corresponding journal articles reported 6.5 (95% CI 6.0-6.5) out of 12 TIDieR items. Conclusion Registration and reporting of invasive cardiology trials is often incomplete and adequate detailed description of the interventions is not provided. TIDieR checklist is an important tool which should be used to ensure rigorous reporting of non-pharmacological interventions in cardiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Lišnić
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Hishaam Ashraf
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, United Kingdom
| | - Marin Viđak
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
- Department of Cardiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Marušić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stazić P, Jurić D, Turić A, Šošić A, Marušić A, Roguljić M. Reporting characteristics of nonsurgical periodontal therapy trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: an observational study. J Comp Eff Res 2023; 12:e230058. [PMID: 37418255 PMCID: PMC10508296 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2023-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the completeness of the description of nonsurgical periodontal therapy interventions in clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and correspondence of registered information for trial participants and outcome measures with published articles. Materials & methods: We retrieved data from ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications. The completeness of intervention reporting was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist for oral hygiene instructions (OHI), professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR), and subgingival instrumentation, antiseptics and antibiotics. The completeness of registration of trial protocol information was assessed according to the WHO Trial Registration DataSet for participant information (enrollment, sample size calculation, age, gender, condition) and primary/secondary outcome measures. Results: 79 included trials involved OHI (n = 38 trials, 48.1%), PMPR (n = 19, 24.1%), antiseptics (n = 11, 12.7%), or antibiotics (n = 11, 12.7%). There was a great variety in the terms used to describe these interventions. Most of the analyzed trials (93.7%) were completed and did not provide any data on study phase (74.7%). The description of intervention in the registry in ClinicalTrials.gov was inadequate for all analyzed interventions, with description inconsistencies in matching publications. There were also discrepancies in registered and published outcomes: for 39 trials with published results, 18 had different registered and reported primary outcomes, and 29 different registered and reported secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The completeness of the description of nonsurgical therapy of periodontitis in clinical trials is unsatisfactory, reducing the quality of translation of the new evidence and procedures into clinical practice. Significant discrepancy in registered and reported trial outcomes calls into question the validity of reported results and relevance for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Stazić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| | - Diana Jurić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| | - Antonela Turić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| | - Antonio Šošić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| | - Ana Marušić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| | - Marija Roguljić
- University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, 21000, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Papagoras D, Tzikos G, Douridas G, Arseniou P, Panagiotou D, Kanara M, Papavramidis T. Visualization of the recurrent laryngeal nerve alone versus intraoperative nerve monitoring in primary thyroidectomy: a framework approach to a missing typology. Front Surg 2023; 10:1176511. [PMID: 37560316 PMCID: PMC10406577 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1176511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical studies evaluating a device or technology in comparison to an established surgical technique should accurately report all the important components of the surgical technique in order to reduce the risk of intervention bias. In the debate of visualization of the recurrent laryngeal nerve alone (VONA) versus intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) during thyroidectomy, surgical technique plays a key role in both strategies. Our aim was to investigate whether the surgical technique was considered as a risk of intervention bias by relevant meta-analyses and reviews and if steps of surgical intervention were described in their included studies. METHODS We searched PUBMED, CENTRAL-Cochrane library, PROSPERO and GOOGLE for reviews and meta-analyses focusing on the comparison of IONM to VONA in primary open thyroidectomy. Τhen, primary studies were extracted from their reference lists. We developed a typology for surgical technique applied in primary studies and a framework approach for the evaluation of this typology by the meta-analyses and reviews. RESULTS Twelve meta-analyses, one review (388,252 nerves at risk), and 84 primary studies (128,720 patients) were included. Five meta-analyses considered the absence of typology regarding the surgical technique as a source of intervention bias; 48 primary studies (57.14%) provided information about at least one item of the typology components and only 1 for all of them. DISCUSSION Surgical technique of thyroidectomy in terms of a typology is underreported in studies and undervalued by meta-analyses comparing VONA to IONM. This missing typology should be reconsidered in the comparative evaluation of these two strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georgios Tzikos
- 1st Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Douridas
- Department of Surgery, Thriassio General Hospital of Elefsina, Elefsina, Greece
| | | | | | - Maria Kanara
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Trikala, Trikala, Greece
| | - Theodosios Papavramidis
- 1st Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grandeo J, Favaro L, Rhon DI, Young JL. Exercise therapy reporting in clinical trials for chronic neck pain: A systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care 2022; 20:796-811. [PMID: 35596275 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review was to assess the reproducibility of exercise therapy used in clinical trials for chronic neck pain (CNP) based on reported items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklists. METHODS Two researchers systematically searched, screened, and selected trials that assessed exercise therapy for CNP between 2000 and 2021 from PubMed, CINAHL, and Ovid Medline. Included studies were published in English, and study participants experienced neck pain for longer than 3 months. Thoroughness of reporting of exercise therapy was assessed using the TIDierR and CERT checklists. Methodological quality of each study was screened with the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Data analysis was performed for descriptive and correlational statistics. RESULTS Sixty-three clinical trials using exercise therapy for treatment of CNP met the inclusion criteria. No study reported all TIDieR or CERT items. The mean number of items reported was 5.44 (SD 2.40, range of 1-11) on the TIDieR, and 8.27 (SD 4.14, range of 0-17) for the CERT. Risk of bias was high for 30 studies (47.6%), somewhat concerning for 20 studies (31.7%), and low for 13 studies (21.7%). Higher risk of bias was associated with a lower number of TIDieR and CERT items reported. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION The majority of exercise therapy trials for CNP lack proper reporting, limiting reproducibility of the interventions in real world clinical practice and follow-on research. After checklists were published, reporting did not improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Grandeo
- Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- University of Lynchburg, School of Physical Therapy, Lynchburg, VA, USA
| | - Laura Favaro
- Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Daemen University, Amherst, NY, USA
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anderson JM, Howard C, Staggs J, Steele R, Strasser T, Small T, Vassar M, Checketts JX. Inadequate Reporting of Complications in Randomized Controlled Trials Cited as Supporting Evidence Underpinning AAOS CPG Recommendations for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Application of the CONSORT Harms Checklist. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:2466-2472.e2. [PMID: 35709908 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been shown to influence clinical decision-making and health policy. Therefore, it is essential that trial outcomes-including harms-are completely reported. METHODS We included all RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Osteoarthritis of the Knee, and Osteoarthritis of theHip Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations. Manuscripts were analyzed for compliance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Extension for Harms items. We determined the Extension for Harms' influence on harms reporting by comparing RCTs published before and after the extension's release. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-three RCTs were included, of which 81 (47%) adequately reported ≥50% of the checklist and 75 (43%) reported ≤33% of the checklist items. The mean number of checklist items reported was 8 items (of 18; 45%). Our interrupted time-series analysis suggests the implementation of the CONSORT Extension for Harms did not have a statistically significant effect on the completeness of harms reporting (P = .35; 95% Confidence interval = -0.0041 to 0.0014). CONCLUSION Harms-related data are poorly reported within RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons management for hip and knee OA Clinical Practice Guideline. Our time series analysis illustrates the failure of the CONSORT Extension for Harms on improving the reporting of harms-related data. Future efforts to improve the quality of harms reporting is crucial for patients, clinicians, and policy makers to perform thorough risk-benefit appraisals as RCT results directly influence clinical decision-making in orthopaedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michael Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| | - Conner Howard
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| | - Jordan Staggs
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| | - Robert Steele
- Kansas City University Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Thomas Strasser
- Kansas City University Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Travis Small
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| | - Matt Vassar
- Oklahoma State University, Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| | - Jake X Checketts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|