1
|
Bury J, Yeowell G, Jinks C, Selfe J, Littlewood C. Development of an intervention ‘The COMBINED approach’ to optimise current treatments for people with a rotator cuff disorder. Physiotherapy 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.12.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
2
|
Crawford-Manning F, Greenall C, Hawarden A, Bullock L, Leyland S, Jinks C, Protheroe J, Paskins Z. Evaluation of quality and readability of online patient information on osteoporosis and osteoporosis drug treatment and recommendations for improvement. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1567-1584. [PMID: 33501570 PMCID: PMC8376728 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05800-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patient information is important to help patients fully participate in their healthcare. Commonly accessed osteoporosis patient information resources were identified and assessed for readability, quality, accuracy and consistency. Resources contained inconsistencies and scored low when assessed for quality and readability. We recommend optimal language and identify information gaps to address. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this paper is to identify commonly accessed patient information resources about osteoporosis and osteoporosis drug treatment, appraise the quality and make recommendations for improvement. METHODS Patient information resources were purposively sampled and text extracted. Data extracts underwent assessment of readability (Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level) and quality (modified International Patient Decision Aid Standards (m-IPDAS)). A thematic analysis was conducted, and keywords and phrases were used to describe osteoporosis and its treatment identified. Findings were presented to a stakeholder group who identified inaccuracies and contradictions and discussed optimal language. RESULTS Nine patient information resources were selected, including webpages, a video and booklets (available online), from government, charity and private healthcare providers. No resource met acceptable readability scores for both measures of osteoporosis information and drug information. Quality scores from the modified IPDAS ranged from 21 to 64% (7-21/33). Thematic analysis was informed by Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Disease. Thirteen subthemes relating to the identity, causes, timeline, consequences and controllability of osteoporosis were identified. Phrases and words from 9 subthemes were presented to the stakeholder group who identified a predominance of medical technical language, misleading terms about osteoporotic bone and treatment benefits, and contradictions about symptoms. They recommended key descriptors for providers to use to describe osteoporosis and treatment benefits. CONCLUSIONS This study found that commonly accessed patient information resources about osteoporosis have highly variable quality, scored poorly on readability assessments and contained inconsistencies and inaccuracies. We produced practical recommendations for information providers to support improvements in understanding, relevance, balance and bias, and to address information gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Crawford-Manning
- School of Medicine, Keele University & Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
| | - C Greenall
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK
| | - A Hawarden
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK
| | - L Bullock
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK
| | - S Leyland
- Royal Osteoporosis Society, Bath, UK
| | - C Jinks
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK
| | - J Protheroe
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Z Paskins
- School of Medicine, Keele University & Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paskins Z, Torres Roldan VD, Hawarden AW, Bullock L, Meritxell Urtecho S, Torres GF, Morera L, Espinoza Suarez NR, Worrall A, Blackburn S, Chapman S, Jinks C, Brito JP. Quality and effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment decision aids: a systematic review and environmental scan. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1837-1851. [PMID: 32500301 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05479-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Decision aids (DAs) are evidence-based tools that support shared decision-making (SDM) implementation in practice; this study aimed to identify existing osteoporosis DAs and assess their quality and efficacy; and to gain feedback from a patient advisory group on findings and implications for further research. We searched multiple bibliographic databases to identify research studies from 2000 to 2019 and undertook an environmental scan (search conducted February 2019, repeated in March 2020). A pair of reviewers, working independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, evaluated each trial's risk of bias, and conducted DA quality assessment using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Public contributors (patients and caregivers with experience of osteoporosis and fragility fractures) participated in discussion groups to review a sample of DAs, express preferences for a new DA, and discuss plans for development of a new DA. We identified 6 studies, with high or unclear risk of bias. Across included studies, use of an osteoporosis DA was reported to result in reduced decisional conflict compared with baseline, increased SDM, and increased accuracy of patients' perceived fracture risk compared with controls. Eleven DAs were identified, of which none met the full set of IPDAS criteria for certification for minimization of bias. Public contributors expressed preferences for encounter DAs that are individualized to patients' own needs and risk. Using a systematic review and environmental scan, we identified 11 decision aids to inform patient decisions about osteoporosis treatment and 6 studies evaluating their effectiveness. Use of decision aids increased accuracy of risk perception and shared decision-making but the decision aids themselves fail to comprehensively meet international quality standards and patient needs, underpinning the need for new DA development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Paskins
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Partnership Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG, UK.
| | - V D Torres Roldan
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Endocrinology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A W Hawarden
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Partnership Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG, UK
| | - L Bullock
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - S Meritxell Urtecho
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Endocrinology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - G F Torres
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - L Morera
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Endocrinology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - N R Espinoza Suarez
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Endocrinology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Worrall
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - S Blackburn
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - S Chapman
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - C Jinks
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - J P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Endocrinology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paskins Z, Crawford-Manning F, Bullock L, Jinks C. Identifying and managing osteoporosis before and after COVID-19: rise of the remote consultation? Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1629-1632. [PMID: 32548787 PMCID: PMC7297512 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05465-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The COVID-19 pandemic is influencing methods of healthcare delivery. In this short review, we discuss the evidence for remote healthcare delivery in the context of osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly had, and will continue to have, a significant impact on the lives of people living with, and at risk of, osteoporosis and those caring for them. With osteoporosis outpatient and Fracture Liaison Services on pause, healthcare organisations have already moved to delivering new and follow-up consultations remotely, where staffing permits, by telephone or video. METHODS In this review, we consider different models of remote care delivery, the evidence for their use, and the possible implications of COVID-19 on osteoporosis services. RESULTS Telemedicine is a global term used to describe any use of telecommunication systems to deliver healthcare from a distance and encompasses a range of different scenarios from remote clinical data transfer to remote clinician-patient interactions. Across a range of conditions and contexts, there remains unclear evidence on the acceptability of telemedicine and the effect on healthcare costs. Within the context of osteoporosis management, there is some limited evidence to suggest telemedicine approaches are acceptable to patients but unclear evidence on whether telemedicine approaches support informed drug adherence. Gaps in the evidence pertain to the acceptability and benefits of using telemedicine in populations with hearing, cognitive, or visual impairments and in those with limited health literacy. CONCLUSION There is an urgent need for further health service evaluation and research to address the impact of remote healthcare delivery during COVID-19 outbreak on patient care, and in the longer term, to identify acceptability and cost- and clinical-effectiveness of remote care delivery on outcomes of relevance to people living with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Paskins
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University & Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
| | - F Crawford-Manning
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University & Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - L Bullock
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| | - C Jinks
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Babatunde OO, Tan V, Jordan JL, Dziedzic K, Chew-Graham CA, Jinks C, Protheroe J, van der Windt DA. Evidence flowers: An innovative, visual method of presenting "best evidence" summaries to health professional and lay audiences. Res Synth Methods 2018; 9:273-284. [PMID: 29439286 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Revised: 11/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barriers to dissemination and engagement with evidence pose a threat to implementing evidence-based medicine. Understanding, retention, and recall can be enhanced by visual presentation of information. The aim of this exploratory research was to develop and evaluate the accessibility and acceptability of visual summaries for presenting evidence syntheses with multiple exposures or outcomes to professional and lay audiences. METHODS "Evidence flowers" were developed as a visual method of presenting data from 4 case scenarios: 2 complex evidence syntheses with multiple outcomes, Cochrane reviews, and clinical guidelines. Petals of evidence flowers were coloured according to the GRADE evidence rating system to display key findings and recommendations from the evidence summaries. Application of evidence flowers was observed during stakeholder workshops. Evaluation and feedback were conducted via questionnaires and informal interviews. RESULTS Feedback from stakeholders on the evidence flowers collected from workshops, questionnaires, and interviews was encouraging and helpful for refining the design of the flowers. Comments were made on the content and design of the flowers, as well as the usability and potential for displaying different types of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Evidence flowers are a novel and visually stimulating method for presenting research evidence from evidence syntheses with multiple exposures or outcomes, Cochrane reviews, and clinical guidelines. To promote access and engagement with research evidence, evidence flowers may be used in conjunction with other evidence synthesis products, such as (lay) summaries, evidence inventories, rapid reviews, and clinical guidelines. Additional research on potential adaptations and applications of the evidence flowers may further bridge the gap between research evidence and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O O Babatunde
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - V Tan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - J L Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - K Dziedzic
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - C A Chew-Graham
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.,West Midlands CLAHRC and South Staffs and Shropshire Foundation Trust, UK
| | - C Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - J Protheroe
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - D A van der Windt
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Healey EL, Jinks C, Foster NE, Chew-Graham CA, Pincus T, Hartshorne L, Cooke K, Nicholls E, Proctor J, Lewis M, Dent S, Wathall S, Hay EM, McBeth J. The feasibility and acceptability of a physical activity intervention for older people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: The iPOPP pilot trial protocol. Musculoskeletal Care 2017; 16:118-132. [PMID: 29218808 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This pilot trial will inform the design and methods of a future full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) and examine the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of the Increasing Physical activity in Older People with chronic Pain (iPOPP) intervention, a healthcare assistant (HCA)-supported intervention to promote walking in older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain in a primary care setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The iPOPP study is an individually randomized, multicentre, three-parallel-arm pilot RCT. A total of 150 participants aged ≥65 years with chronic pain in one or more index sites will be recruited and randomized using random permuted blocks, stratified by general practice, to: (i) usual care plus written information; (ii) pedometer plus usual care and written information; or (iii) the iPOPP intervention. A theoretically informed mixed-methods approach will be employed using semi-structured interviews, audio recordings of the HCA consultations, self-reported questionnaires, case report forms and objective physical activity data collection (accelerometry). Follow-up will be conducted 12 weeks post-randomization. Collection of the quantitative data and statistical analysis will be performed blinded to treatment allocation, and analysis will be exploratory to inform the design and methods of a future RCT. Analysis of the HCA consultation recordings will focus on the use of a checklist to determine the fidelity of the iPOPP intervention delivery, and the interview data will be analysed using a constant comparison approach in order to generate conceptual themes focused around the acceptability and feasibility of the trial, and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to understand barriers and facilitators to behaviour change. A triangulation protocol will be used to integrate quantitative and qualitative data and findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - C Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - N E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - C A Chew-Graham
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - T Pincus
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.,Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
| | - L Hartshorne
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - K Cooke
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - E Nicholls
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - J Proctor
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - M Lewis
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - S Dent
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - S Wathall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - E M Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK
| | - J McBeth
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jordan K, Edwards J, Porcheret M, Healey E, Jinks C, Bedson J, Clarkson K, Hay E, Dziedzic K. Effect of a model consultation informed by guidelines on recorded quality of care of osteoarthritis (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25:1588-1597. [PMID: 28591564 PMCID: PMC5613776 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of a model osteoarthritis (OA) consultation (MOAC) informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations compared with usual care on recorded quality of care of clinical OA in general practice. DESIGN Two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Eight general practices in Cheshire, Shropshire, or Staffordshire UK. PARTICIPANTS General practitioners and nurses with patients consulting with clinical OA. INTERVENTION Following six-month baseline period practices were randomised to intervention (n = 4) or usual care (n = 4). Intervention practices delivered MOAC (enhanced initial GP consultation, nurse-led clinic, OA guidebook) to patients aged ≥45 years consulting with clinical OA. An electronic (e-)template for consultations was used in all practices to record OA quality care indicators. OUTCOMES Quality of OA care over six months recorded in the medical record. RESULTS 1851 patients consulted in baseline period (1015 intervention; 836 control); 1960 consulted following randomisation (1118 intervention; 842 control). At baseline wide variations in quality of care were noted. Post-randomisation increases were found for written advice on OA (4-28%), exercise (4-22%) and weight loss (1-15%) in intervention practices but not controls (1-3%). Intervention practices were more likely to refer to physiotherapy (10% vs 2%, odds ratio 5.30; 95% CI 2.11, 13.34), and prescribe paracetamol (22% vs 14%, 1.74; 95% CI 1.27, 2.38). CONCLUSIONS The intervention did not improve all aspects of care but increased core NICE recommendations of written advice on OA, exercise and weight management. There remains a need to reduce variation and uniformly enhance improvement in recorded OA care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN06984617.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K.P. Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK,Keele Clinical Trials Unit, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK,Address correspondence and reprint requests to: K.P. Jordan, Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.Arthritis Research UK Primary Care CentreResearch Institute for Primary Care & Health SciencesKeele UniversityDavid Weatherall BuildingStaffordshireST5 5BGUK
| | - J.J. Edwards
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - M. Porcheret
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - E.L. Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - C. Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - J. Bedson
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - K. Clarkson
- Keele Clinical Trials Unit, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - E.M. Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - K.S. Dziedzic
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jinks C, Liddle J, Healey EL, Mallen CD, Chew-Graham CA. P02 “It’s just a little bit of add-on to the end, you know” Integrating joint pain, anxiety and depression in primary care long-term condition reviews: analysis of audio-recorded consultations. Br J Soc Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208064.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
9
|
Rowley R, Jinks C, Richardson JC. P07 Media constructions of ‘arthritis’: a mixed Methods qualitative study. Br J Soc Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208064.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
10
|
Jinks C, Mahmood W, Jayakumar P, Gwilym S, Blackburn S, Worrall A, Paskins Z. OP0251-PARE Patient and Public Involvement in Design, Analysis and Reporting of A Public Priority Setting Exercise for Research in Osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.3302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
11
|
Jinks C, Morden A, Chew-Graham C, Porcheret M, Finney A, Dziedzic K, Healey E, Tan V, Cooper V, Jordan J, Mallen C. AB0843 Case-Finding for Joint Pain and Anxiety and Depression: the Enhance Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
12
|
Edwards J, Jordan K, Porcheret M, Healey E, Jinks C, Bedson J, Clarkson K, Hay E, Dziedzic K. OP0106 Effect of a Model Consultation on Quality of Care of Osteoarthritis: A Primary Care Cluster Randomised Trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.3443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
13
|
Jinks C, Moore A, Holden M, Foster N. THU0457 Long Term Barriers and Facilitators to Exercise and Physical Activity in Older Adults with Knee Pain: The Beep Longitudinal Qualitative Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.1426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
14
|
Higginbottom A, Jinks C, Bird J, Rhodes C, Blackburn S, Dziedzic K. OP0014-PARE From Design to Implementation – Patient and Public Involvement in an Nihr Research Programme in Osteoarthritis in Primary Care. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.2944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
15
|
Silverwood V, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Jinks C, Jordan JL, Protheroe J, Jordan KP. Current evidence on risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23:507-15. [PMID: 25447976 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 504] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability and leads to a reduced quality of life. The aim was to determine the current evidence on risk factors for onset of knee pain/OA in those aged 50 and over. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of cohort studies for risk factors for the onset of knee pain. Two authors screened abstracts and papers and completed data extraction. Where possible, pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated via random effects meta-analysis and population attributable fractions (PAFs) derived. 6554 papers were identified and after screening 46 studies were included. The main factors associated with onset of knee pain were being overweight (pooled OR 1.98, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.57-2.20), obesity (pooled OR 2.66 95% CI 2.15-3.28), female gender (pooled OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.37-2.07), previous knee injury (pooled OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.91-4.19). Hand OA (pooled OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.90-1.87) was found to be non-significant. Smoking was found not to be a statistically significant risk or protective factor (pooled OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.01). PAFs indicated that in patients with new onset of knee pain 5.1% of cases were due to previous knee injury and 24.6% related to being overweight or obese. Clinicians can use the identified risk factors to identify and manage patients at risk of developing or increasing knee pain. Obesity in particular needs to be a major target for prevention of development of knee pain. More research is needed into a number of potential risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Silverwood
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - M Blagojevic-Bucknall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - C Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - J L Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - J Protheroe
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - K P Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Backhouse MR, Vinall KA, Redmond A, Helliwell P, Keenan AM, Dale RM, Thomas A, Aronson D, Turner-Cobb J, Sengupta R, France B, Hill I, Flurey CA, Morris M, Pollock J, Hughes R, Richards P, Hewlett S, Ryan S, Lille K, Adams J, Haq I, McArthur M, Goodacre L, Birt L, Wilson O, Kirwan J, Dures E, Quest E, Hewlett S, Rajak R, Thomas T, Lawson T, Petford S, Hale E, Kitas GD, Ryan S, Gooberman-Hill R, Jinks C, Dziedzic K, Boucas SB, Hislop K, Rhodes C, Adams J, Ali F, Jinks C, Ong BN, Backhouse MR, White D, Hensor E, Keenan AM, Helliwell P, Redmond A, Ferguson AM, Douiri A, Scott DL, Lempp H, Halls S, Law RJ, Jones J, Markland D, Maddison P, Thom J, Law RJ, Thom JM, Maddison P, Breslin A, Kraus A, Gordhan C, Dennis S, Connor J, Chowdhary B, Lottay N, Juneja P, Bacon PA, Isaacs D, Jack J, Keller M, Tibble J, Haq I, Hammond A, Gill R, Tyson S, Tennant A, Nordenskiold U, Pease EE, Pease CT, Trehane A, Rahmeh F, Cornell P, Westlake SL, Rose K, Alber CF, Watson L, Stratton R, Lazarus M, McNeilly NE, Waterfield J, Hurley M, Greenwood J, Clayton AM, Lynch M, Clewes A, Dawson J, Abernethy V, Griffiths AE, Chamberlain VA, McLoughlin Y, Campbell S, Hayes J, Moffat C, McKenna F, Shah P, Rajak R, Williams A, Rhys-Dillon C, Goodfellow R, Martin JC, Rajak R, Bari F, Hughes G, Thomas E, Baker S, Collins D, Price E, Williamson L, Dunkley L, Youll MJ, Rodziewicz M, Reynolds JA, Berry J, Pavey C, Hyrich K, Gorodkin R, Wilkinson K, Bruce I, Barton A, Silman A, Ho P, Cornell T, Westlake SL, Richards S, Holmes A, Parker S, Smith H, Briggs N, Arthanari S, Nisar M, Thwaites C, Ryan S, Kamath S, Price S, Robinson SM, Walker D, Coop H, Al-Allaf W, Baker S, Williamson L, Price E, Collins D, Charleton RC, Griffiths B, Edwards EA, Partlett R, Martin K, Tarzi M, Panthakalam S, Freeman T, Ainley L, Turner M, Hughes L, Russell B, Jenkins S, Done J, Young A, Jones T, Gaywood IC, Pande I, Pradere MJ, Bhaduri M, Smith A, Cook H, Abraham S, Ngcozana T, Denton CP, Parker L, Black CM, Ong V, Thompson N, White C, Duddy M, Jobanputra P, Bacon P, Smith J, Richardson A, Giancola G, Soh V, Spencer S, Greenhalgh A, Hanson M, De Lord D, Lloyd M, Wong H, Wren D, Grover B, Hall J, Neville C, Alton P, Kelly S, Bombardieri M, Humby F, Ng N, Di Cicco M, Hands R, Epis O, Filer A, Buckley C, McInnes I, Taylor P, Pitzalis C, Freeston J, Conaghan P, Grainger A, O'Connor PJ, Evans R, Emery P, Hodgson R, Emery P, Fleischmann R, Han C, van der Heijde D, Conaghan P, Xu W, Hsia E, Kavanaugh A, Gladman D, Chattopadhyay C, Beutler A, Han C, Zayat AS, Conaghan P, Freeston J, Hensor E, Ellegard K, Terslev L, Emery P, Wakefield RJ, Ciurtin C, Leandro M, Dey D, Nandagudi A, Giles I, Shipley M, Morris V, Ioannou J, Ehrenstein M, Sen D, Chan M, Quinlan TM, Brophy R, Mewar D, Patel D, Wilby MJ, Pellegrini V, Eyes B, Crooks D, Anderson M, Ball E, McKeeman H, Burns J, Yau WH, Moore O, Foo J, Benson C, Patterson C, Wright G, Taggart A, Drew S, Tanner L, Sanyal K, Bourke BE, Lloyd M, Alston C, Baqai C, Chard M, Sandhu V, Neville C, Jordan K, Munns C, Zouita L, Shattles W, Davies U, Makadsi R, Griffith S, Kiely PD, Ciurtin C, Dimofte I, Dabu M, Dabu B, Dobarro D, Schreiber BE, Warrell C, Handler C, Coghlan G, Denton C, Ishorari J, Bunn C, Beynon H, Denton CP, Stratton R, George Malal JJ, Boton-Maggs B, Leung A, Farewell D, Choy E, Gullick NJ, Young A, Choy EH, Scott DL, Wincup C, Fisher B, Charles P, Taylor P, Gullick NJ, Pollard LC, Kirkham BW, Scott DL, Ma MH, Ramanujan S, Cavet G, Haney D, Kingsley GH, Scott D, Cope A, Singh A, Wilson J, Isaacs A, Wing C, McLaughlin M, Penn H, Genovese MC, Sebba A, Rubbert-Roth A, Scali J, Zilberstein M, Thompson L, Van Vollenhoven R, De Benedetti F, Brunner H, Allen R, Brown D, Chaitow J, Pardeo M, Espada G, Flato B, Horneff G, Devlin C, Kenwright A, Schneider R, Woo P, Martini A, Lovell D, Ruperto N, John H, Hale ED, Treharne GJ, Kitas GD, Carroll D, Mercer L, Low A, Galloway J, Watson K, Lunt M, Symmons D, Hyrich K, Low A, Mercer L, Galloway J, Davies R, Watson K, Lunt M, Dixon W, Hyrich K, Symmons D, Balarajah S, Sandhu A, Ariyo M, Rankin E, Sandoo A, van Zanten JJV, Toms TE, Carroll D, Kitas GD, Sandoo A, Smith JP, Kitas GD, Malik S, Toberty E, Thalayasingam N, Hamilton J, Kelly C, Puntis D, Malik S, Hamilton J, Saravanan V, Rynne M, Heycock C, Kelly C, Rajak R, Goodfellow R, Rhys-Dillon C, Winter R, Wardle P, Martin JC, Toms T, Sandoo A, Smith J, Cadman S, Nightingale P, Kitas G, Alhusain AZ, Verstappen SM, Mirjafari H, Lunt M, Charlton-Menys V, Bunn D, Symmons D, Durrington P, Bruce I, Cooney JK, Thom JM, Moore JP, Lemmey A, Jones JG, Maddison PJ, Ahmad YA, Ahmed TJ, Leone F, Kiely PD, Browne HK, Rhys-Dillon C, Wig S, Chevance A, Moore T, Manning J, Vail A, Herrick AL, Derrett-Smith E, Hoyles R, Moinzadeh P, Chighizola C, Khan K, Ong V, Abraham D, Denton CP, Schreiber BE, Dobarro D, Warrell CE, Handler C, Denton CP, Coghlan G, Sykes R, Muir L, Ennis H, Herrick AL, Shiwen X, Thompson K, Khan K, Liu S, Denton CP, Leask A, Abraham DJ, Strickland G, Pauling J, Betteridge Z, Dunphy J, Owen P, McHugh N, Abignano G, Cuomo G, Buch MH, Rosenberg WM, Valentini G, Emery P, Del Galdo F, Jenkins J, Pauling JD, McHugh N, Khan K, Shiwen X, Abraham D, Denton CP, Ong V, Moinzadeh P, Howell K, Ong V, Nihtyanova S, Denton CP, Moinzadeh P, Fonseca C, Khan K, Abraham D, Ong V, Denton CP, Malaviya AP, Hadjinicolaou AV, Nisar MK, Ruddlesden M, Furlong A, Baker S, Hall FC, Hadjinicolaou AV, Malaviya AP, Nisar MK, Ruddlesden M, Raut-Roy D, Furlong A, Baker S, Hall FC, Peluso R, Dario Di Minno MN, Iervolino S, Costa L, Atteno M, Lofrano M, Soscia E, Castiglione F, Foglia F, Scarpa R, Wallis D, Thomas A, Hill I, France B, Sengupta R, Dougados M, Keystone E, Heckaman M, Mease P, Landewe R, Nguyen D, Heckaman M, Mease P, Winfield RA, Dyke C, Clemence M, Mackay K, Haywood KL, Packham J, Jordan KP, Davies H, Brophy S, Irvine E, Cooksey R, Dennis MS, Siebert S, Kingsley GH, Ibrahim F, Scott DL, Kavanaugh A, McInnes I, Chattopadhyay C, Krueger G, Gladman D, Beutler A, Gathany T, Mudivarthy S, Mack M, Tandon N, Han C, Mease P, McInnes I, Sieper J, Braun J, Emery P, van der Heijde D, Isaacs J, Dahmen G, Wollenhaupt J, Schulze-Koops H, Gsteiger S, Bertolino A, Hueber W, Tak PP, Cohen CJ, Karaderi T, Pointon JJ, Wordsworth BP, Cooksey R, Davies H, Dennis MS, Siebert S, Brophy S, Keidel S, Pointon JJ, Farrar C, Karaderi T, Appleton LH, Wordsworth BP, Adshead R, Tahir H, Greenwood M, Donnelly SP, Wajed J, Kirkham B. BHPR research: qualitative * 1. Complex reasoning determines patients' perception of outcome following foot surgery in rheumatoid arhtritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
17
|
McErlane F, Beresford MW, Baildam EM, Thomson W, Hyrich K, Chieng A, Davidson J, Foster HE, Gardner-Medwin J, Lunt M, Wedderburn L, Nikiphorou E, Carpenter L, Kiely P, Walsh D, Dixey J, Young A, Kapoor SR, Filer A, Fitzpatrick M, Fisher BA, Taylor PC, Buckley C, McInnes I, Raza K, Young SP, Dougados M, Kissel K, Amital H, Conaghan P, Martin-Mola E, Nasonov E, Schett G, Troum O, Veldi T, Bernasconi C, Huizinga T, Durez P, Genovese MC, Richards HB, Supronik J, Dokoupilova E, Aelion JA, Lee SH, Codding CE, Kellner H, Ikawa T, Hugot S, Ligozio G, Mpofu S, Kavanaugh A, Emery P, Fleischmann R, Van Vollenhoven R, Pavelka K, Durez P, Guerette B, Santra S, Redden L, Kupper H, Smolen JS, Wilkie R, Tajar A, McBeth J, Hooper LS, Bowen CJ, Gates L, Culliford D, Edwards CJ, Arden NK, Adams J, Ryan S, Haywood H, Pain H, Siddle HJ, Redmond AC, Waxman R, Dagg AR, Alcacer-Pitarch B, Wilkins RA, Helliwell PS, Norton S, Kiely P, Walsh D, Williams R, Young A, Halls S, Law RJ, Jones J, Markland D, Maddison P, Thom J, Parker B, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD, Bruce I, Croca SC, Pericleous C, Yong H, Isenberg D, Giles I, Rahman A, Ioannou Y, Warrell CE, Dobarro D, Handler C, Denton CP, Schreiber BE, Coghlan JG, Betteridge ZE, Woodhead F, Bunn C, Denton CP, Abraham D, Desai S, du Bois R, Wells A, McHugh N, Abignano G, Aydin S, Castillo-Gallego C, Woods D, Meekings A, McGonagle D, Emery P, Del Galdo F, Vila J, Mitchell S, Bowman S, Price E, Pease CT, Emery P, Andrews J, Bombardieri M, Sutcliffe N, Pitzalis C, Lanyon P, Hunter J, Gupta M, McLaren J, Regan M, Cooper A, Giles I, Isenberg D, Vadivelu S, Coady D, Griffiths B, Lendrem D, Foggo H, Tarn J, Ng WF, Goodhead C, Shekar P, Kelly C, Francis G, Bailey AM, Thompson L, Hamilton J, Salisbury C, Foster NE, Bishop A, Coast J, Franchini A, Hall J, Hollinghurst S, Hopper C, Grove S, Kaur S, Montgomery A, Paskins Z, Sanders T, Croft PR, Hassell AB, Coxon DE, Frisher M, Jordan KP, Jinks C, Peat G, Monk HL, Muller S, Mallen C, Hider SL, Roddy E, Muller S, Hayward R, Mallen C. Oral abstracts 3: RA Treatment and outcomes * O13. Validation of jadas in all subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a clinical setting. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
18
|
Buckland S, Jinks C, Carter P, Jordan KP, de Wit M, Kirwan J, Rader T. Patient and public involvement in musculoskeletal research: IP104. Patient and Public Involvement in Musculoskeletal Research: The National Agenda. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
19
|
Blagojevic M, Jinks C, Jeffery A, Jordan KP. Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18:24-33. [PMID: 19751691 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 785] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2009] [Revised: 07/23/2009] [Accepted: 08/01/2009] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is common in older adults. Determination of risk factors for onset of knee OA may help in its prevention. The objective of this systematic review, and meta-analysis, was to determine the current evidence on risk factors for knee OA. DESIGN A systematic literature search was carried out for cohort and case-control studies evaluating the association of demographic, comorbid, and other patient-determined factors with onset of knee OA. A scoring tool was developed to assess the quality of studies. Heterogeneity of studies was examined. Where possible studies were pooled to give an overall estimate of the association of factors with onset of knee OA. RESULTS Of the 2233 studies screened, 85 were eventually included in the review. Study quality tended to be moderate. The main factors consistently associated with knee OA were obesity (pooled OR 2.63, 95% CI 2.28-3.05), previous knee trauma (pooled OR 3.86, 95% CI 2.61-5.70), hand OA (pooled OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.10), female gender (pooled OR 1.84 95% CI 1.32-2.55) and older age. Smoking appeared to have a moderate protective effect, however this was not evident once the analysis was restricted to cohort studies only. CONCLUSIONS Whilst certain factors have been extensively reviewed (for example, body mass index), more longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the association of physical occupational and other patient-determined factors with future knee OA. The quality of such studies also needs to be improved. However, there are identifiable factors which can be targeted for prevention of disabling knee pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Blagojevic
- Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jinks C, Jordan KP, Blagojevic M, Croft P. Predictors of onset and progression of knee pain in adults living in the community. A prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47:368-74. [PMID: 18263594 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate determinants of the onset and progression of knee pain in a population-based sample of people aged > or = 50 yrs. METHODS Prospective cohort study of 2982 people registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire, UK. Using questionnaire surveys at baseline and 3 yrs, demographic, knee-related and general health factors were assessed for their relationship with onset of new knee pain, and progression from non-severe to severe knee pain. RESULTS Response rates were 77% (baseline) and 75% (follow-up). Baseline factors significantly associated with onset of knee pain were knee injury [odds ratio (OR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.2], depression (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1, 1.8), widespread pain (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9 compared with no pain) and younger age. Onset of severe knee pain was associated most strongly with obesity (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7, 5.1) and physical limitations (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5, 4.1), and with widespread pain, older age, female gender and comorbidity. The strongest independent predictors of progression from non-severe to severe knee pain were chronicity (OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.1, 4.6), previous use of health care (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5, 3.3) and obesity (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.6). CONCLUSION In addition to a focus on obesity, there is potential for primary prevention of knee pain by tackling knee injuries and treating depression. Other factors are likely to determine whether the knee pain then progresses. An area for future research is the ineffectiveness of current health care in halting or reversing progression of knee pain at a population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether consulting a general practicioner (GP) in the 3 years after reporting knee pain is linked to better knee pain outcomes (reduced presence or severity of knee pain) at the end of the 3 year period. METHODS We undertook a population-based cohort study linking baseline (2000) and follow-up (2003) surveys to primary care medical records. The cohort comprised 1577 adults aged 50 and over registered at 3 general practices in North Staffordshire, UK, who reported knee pain in a baseline survey. The main outcome measures were self-reported prevalence of knee pain and severity of knee pain in the follow-up survey. The relationship between consultation and future knee pain status was adjusted for an individual's propensity to consult given related demographic and health-related factors. RESULTS In persons who consulted for knee pain, 91% reported knee pain at 3 years, compared with 73% of those who did not consult (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.25; 95% CI 1.56 to 3.26). Among persons reporting severe knee pain or disability at baseline (n=669), those who consulted for knee pain were more likely to report severe knee pain or disability at 3 years than those who did not consult (82% v 65%, adjusted OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.93). CONCLUSIONS Older adults with knee pain continue to have persistent problems regardless of whether they consult primary care or not. Further research is needed to identify more effective means of reducing the burden of knee pain in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Blagojevic
- Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Jinks C, Jordan K, Croft P. Osteoarthritis as a public health problem: the impact of developing knee pain on physical function in adults living in the community: (KNEST 3). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46:877-81. [PMID: 17308312 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of newly developed knee pain on general health and physical function of people >or=50 yrs living in the community. METHODS Prospective cohort study of 3907 people aged 50+ registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire, in the UK. The main outcome measures were self-reported knee pain; general health and physical function as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36). RESULTS Of those with no knee pain at baseline, 24% (n = 501) reported it at follow-up. There was a steep decline in physical function in this group (mean fall in SF-36 score at follow-up 10.3 points) compared with the 1558 persons who had no knee pain at baseline or follow-up (mean fall 3.3). Those with knee pain at baseline whose pain had resolved at 3-yr follow-up (n = 409) showed only minor improvements in physical functioning scores at follow-up (mean improvement -1.3). CONCLUSIONS The onset of knee pain is associated with a substantial and persistent reduction of physical function in older adults living in the community. Since knee pain is common, and reduced physical function in mid to older ages is a strong predictor of future disability and dependency, effective prevention or early treatment of knee pain at these ages is likely to have a major influence on healthy ageing in the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jinks C, Jordan K, Ong BN, Croft P. A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care (KNEST). 2. Results from a survey in the general population aged 50 and over. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43:55-61. [PMID: 12923283 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To use a brief screening tool to identify knee pain (all knee pain, non-chronic and chronic knee pain) and associated health-care use in the general population aged 50 yr and over. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 8995 individuals registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire, UK. The questionnaire included a Knee Pain Screening Tool (KNEST), the Short Form 36 (SF36), demographic questions and, for those who reported knee pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). RESULTS The survey achieved a 77% response. The 12-month period prevalence of all knee pain was 46.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.6%, 48.0%]. Figures for non-chronic knee pain (pain of less than 3 months duration) and chronic knee pain (pain of more than 3 months duration) were 21.5% (95% CI 20.5%, 22.5%) and 25.3% (95% CI 24.3%, 26.4%) respectively. An estimated 6% of the older population had non-chronic but severe knee pain or disability. Thirty-three per cent of all knee pain sufferers had consulted their general practitioner (GP) about their symptom in the last year. This included 34% of those with non-chronic but severe knee pain or disability and 56% of those with chronic and severe knee pain or disability. The use of private treatments or services for knee pain was minimal. A third of those with chronic and severe knee pain or disability had not used any services (including GP) in the last year. CONCLUSIONS The KNEST is a simple tool for the identification of individuals with knee pain and their health-care use. Focusing only on chronic knee pain will underestimate the total need and demand for health-care in knee pain sufferers in the general older population, as non-chronic as well as chronic knee pain has a significant impact on people's lives and on their use of primary health-care. The KNEST, when combined with the WOMAC, identifies population groups who have potentially diverse health-care needs and who might benefit from effective health-care. These data can be used alongside evidence on effective treatments by service planners when considering needs for the care of older adults in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate and analyse concerns raised by unsolicited mailing of a health survey to a community sample of older people. DESIGN Observation and monitoring of all telephone calls received throughout a 6-week survey mailing period. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A total sample of all those aged over 50 years registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire (n=8995). MAIN VARIABLE STUDIED: The frequency of telephone contact following the receipt of a postal questionnaire, and the nature of any associated distress. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Individuals who receive unsolicited postal surveys may experience anxiety because of the actual receipt of the questionnaire, concerns about taking part or not taking part, personal issues, anger, worthiness or frustration with NHS services. Anxiety may also be triggered because of administrative issues, for example lost mail or overlap between mailing periods. Researchers can adopt measures both to reduce the potential anxiety and often hidden burden of postal surveys, and to facilitate individuals' positive participation in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Hornbeam Building, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To design and test the performance of a new knee pain screening tool (KNEST), both separately and together with a combination of existing questionnaires, which will be used to assess the general health status of knee pain sufferers in primary care. METHODS A postal survey of knee pain and disability was sent to a random sample of 240 individuals aged over 55 yr registered with two general practices in North STAFFORDSHIRE: The survey questionnaire consisted of the KNEST; a pain manikin; the Short Form 36 (SF-36); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); demographic questions; and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for those who reported knee pain. A second, identical questionnaire was sent 2 weeks later to a random subsample of responders (n=80) to test repeatability. RESULTS An 85% baseline response rate was achieved for the first questionnaire. The 12-month prevalence of knee pain identified from baseline responders to the survey was 45%. A response rate of 74% was achieved for the repeatability questionnaire. Each section of the questionnaire was well completed and repeatability was good for nearly all measures (most reliability scores exceeded 0.6). A new core question about knee pain showed good internal reliability, with an agreement score of 91% between baseline and retest assessment, and good construct validity in relation to knee pain identified on the pain manikin (agreement 95%). Good agreement was found between recalled consultation for knee pain in the questionnaire and evidence of consultation for knee pain in general practice records. CONCLUSIONS The KNEST appears to be a reliable and valid composite tool for the study of population needs and outcomes of care for people aged over 55 yr with knee pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Primary Care Sciences Research Centre and. School of Health, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The Treaty of Rome seeks to generate a common European market whereby all barriers to the free movement of produce, capital, services and labour are removed. Current EU policy on the free movement of labour requires that healthcare workers, who are EU citizens and meet certain training criteria, have the right to register to practice in member states other than the one in which they trained. This policy is underpinned by the EEC Directives. For example, the Medical Directive 93/16/EEC describes the framework for the mutual recognition of medical diplomas, certificates and other evidence of qualifications through out the European Economic Area (EEA). The potential impact of this for health policy is clear-workforce planning and the demand for doctors, (and also nurses and other health care professionals), could be particularly affected by new forces impacting on their supply. This paper reports on the reality of labour mobility today, and on the factors upon which mobility depends, by the means of a case study which, investigated the movement into UK of doctors from the EEA. At a formal level there is mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of qualifications. However, formal and 'real life' recognition could be in tension equating in policy terms to an implementation deficit. As a result, there is a 'mixed picture' which makes predicting the future (both for individual countries and for the European Union) even more difficult. Furthermore, different policy objectives have to be reconciled. Do we want high mobility; or do we want to preserve national manpower planning?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Centre for Health Planning and Management, Keele University, ST5 5BG, Keele, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jinks C, Ong BN, Paton C. Workforce planning. Catching the drift. Health Serv J 1998; 108:24-6. [PMID: 10186168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
NHS workforce planning has traditionally ignored the role of doctors and nurses trained in continental Europe and Scandinavia. At present doctors trained in the European Economic Area make up 10 per cent of senior house officers in England and Wales. But the numbers coming to the UK are falling. Falling medical unemployment in Europe will mean these doctors have less incentive to come to the UK, leaving a considerable gap in the NHS workforce. More local research is needed into working patterns and career plans of European-trained nurses and doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jinks
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Keele
| | | | | |
Collapse
|