Hip Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Is Low Among Graduating Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Evaluating effectiveness of cadaveric arthroscopic training for orthopaedic residents: A comparison of joints and training levels

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effects and interactions of training level and different joints on the outcomes of cadaveric arthroscopic training courses for orthopaedic residents.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 16 orthopaedic residents who voluntarily participated in a cadaveric training programme involving the shoulder, elbow, wrist, knee and ankle joints. Outcomes were quantitatively assessed using task-specific checklists and the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the significance of the interactions between joint and years of training.

Results

Resident scores significantly increased after the dedicated lectures in all five joints (p = 0.003 for the shoulder module, p < 0.001 for the other joints). Two-way ANOVA revealed that the progress made after the dedicated lectures was significantly impacted by the joint (p = 0.006) and training level × joint interaction (p = 0.005) but not by the training level (p = 0.47). The simple effect of the joint was examined using Sidak's multiple comparison test. Among junior residents, the dedicated lectures resulted in more substantial progress in elbow and wrist arthroscopy when compared to shoulder arthroscopy (p = 0.020 and p = 0.043, respectively).

Conclusions

The results suggest that, in cadaveric arthroscopic training courses for orthopaedic residents, training outcomes are primarily impacted by the specific joint being trained rather than the training level. Specifically, junior residents demonstrated greater improvement with training in procedures that are less commonly encountered during on-the-job training, such as elbow and wrist arthroscopy.

Clinical Relevance

These findings suggest the need to prioritise wrist and elbow arthroscopic training for junior residents to optimise educational outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

THE STATE OF HIP ARTHROSCOPY IN RUSSIA: ASSESSMENT BASED ON A SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DOCTORS

Background.Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive surgical technique most commonly performed to correct femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The number of hip arthroscopy performed in Russia is unknown. Information about this surgical technique is also very limited in our country.The aim of the study was to assess the level of hip arthroscopy in Russia.Methods.A sociological survey of orthopaedic surgeon with experience in performing hip arthroscopy was conducted. The questionnaire was posted on the Google Forms platform. The survey included 54 surgeons from Russian clinics, 45 people filled out the questionnaire.Results.The majority of specialists (73,30,06%) were trained in hip arthroscopy. More than half of the respondents (68,80,06%) are currently engaged in this surgical area, however, in 45,160,07% of them, the number of operations does not exceed 5 per year. For surgeons who have completed two or more training courses, the volume of operations performed is higher (p0,05). 51,110,07% of doctors perform arthroscopy using an alternative technique. There are 2,5 time more specialists doing just bone resection, than surgeons who apply any kind of reconstruction technique while treating FAI (p0,05). Fifteen respondents (48,390,08%) perform debridement as an attempt to delay arthroplasty. The most common difficulties faced by surgeon are problems with the diagnosis of FAI (400,02%), lack of the necessary tools (400,02%) and sufficient time to master the technique (33,30,07%). Only three (6,60,07%) respondents believed to achieve planned results, 93,30,03% of surgeons said that it is not always possible to achieve the desired outcomes.Conclusion. Hip arthroscopy in Russia is not very common, the volume of such interventions is insignificant. Doctors not skilled in arthroscopic hip surgery predominate. Factors impeding the development of this area in our country are related to teaching methods, FAI diagnostics, the lack of necessary instruments for performing operations, and the lack of time for specialists to master surgical techniques.

Ankle Arthroscopy Procedural Volume Is Low Among Graduating Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

Purpose

To evaluate graduating orthopaedic resident case volume and variability for ankle arthroscopy from 2016 to 2020.

Methods

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surgical case log data from 2016 to 2020 for graduating United States orthopaedic surgery residents was assessed. Arthroscopy procedures of the leg/ankle were categorized. The average number of cases performed per resident was compared from 2016 to 2020 to determine the percent change in case volume. The 10th, 30th, 50th, 70th, and 90th percentiles of case volumes from 2016 to 2020 were presented to demonstrate case volume variability.

Results

There was no significant change in the average number of leg/ankle arthroscopy cases from 2016 to 2020 (6.2 ± 5 [range 0-35] vs 6.1 ± 6 [range 0-76] P = .732), despite a 19% increase in the average number of total leg/ankle procedures performed over time (168.4 ± 47 [range 55-414] in 2016; 200.8 ± 57 in 2020 [range 67-601], P < .001). There was wide variability in ankle arthroscopy case volume among residents. The 90th percentile of residents performed 13 cases in 2020, compared with 5 in 50th percentile, and 1 in the 10th percentile.

Conclusions

Orthopaedic surgery resident exposure to ankle arthroscopy has remained low and highly variable overtime, despite an overall increase in the total number of leg/ankle procedures performed.

Clinical Relevance

Understanding ankle arthroscopy in case volume and variability is important for programs to ensure that orthopaedic residents are gaining adequate exposure to increasingly popular procedures. Orthopaedic surgery residency programs should explore methods to increase resident exposure to ankle arthroscopy.