Deficits in Contralateral Limb Strength Can Overestimate Limb Symmetry Index After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Beware of the "Moving Target" - Uninvolved Limb Strength Increases to Exceed Preoperative Values During Rehabilitation After ACL Reconstruction in Male Professional and Recreational Athletes

OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in quadriceps and hamstrings muscle strength in the uninvolved limb of male professional and recreational athletes during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and compare to preoperative strength values. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. METHODS: During rehabilitation, 665 participants who underwent unilateral ACLR performed a strength test preoperatively and every 6 weeks after surgery for up to 9 months. Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength of the uninvolved limb were measured at an angular velocity of 60°/s and normalized to body weight (N·m/kg). RESULTS: Quadriceps and hamstrings strength of the uninvolved limb gradually increased during rehabilitation until 6 months post-ACLR, and plateaued thereafter. Postoperative quadriceps' strength significantly exceeded preoperative values by 3 months for professional (2.99 N·m/kg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.93, 3.04; P = .007) and by 6 months for recreational athletes (2.77 N·m/kg; 95% CI: 2.71, 2.83; P<.001), and hamstrings exceeded presurgery levels by 4.5 months (1.71 N·m/kg; 95% CI: 1.67, 1.74; P<.001 and 1.43 N·m/kg; 95% CI: 1.40, 1.46; P = .002, professional and recreational athletes respectively). CONCLUSION: In male professional and recreational athletes, uninvolved limb quadriceps and hamstrings strength gradually improved after ACLR, until 6 months after surgery. The uninvolved limb's strength may present as a "moving target" that requires consistent monitoring during rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(4):1-9. Epub 14 December 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11961.

Absolute and Normalized Normative Torque Values of Knee Extensors and Flexors in Healthy Trained Subjects: Asymmetry Questions the Classical Use of Uninjured Limb as Reference

Purpose

To provide normative values of maximal isometric torque of knee extensors and flexors measured at 80° of knee flexion and to characterize the results in healthy subjects practicing activities at risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Methods

Seventy-four trained volunteers (35 male and 39 female) aged 18 to 41 years were recruited. They alternately performed 3 maximal voluntary isometric contractions of knee extension and flexion. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction net torque was computed as the mean value of the peak torques recorded over the 3 trials.

Results

For women, the absolute torque for extensors was 143.5 ± 34.4 N⋅m (range, 87.7-253.1 N⋅m) and 66.8 ± 13.8 N⋅m (range, 37.5-93.1) for flexors. For men, the absolute torque for extensors was 199.8 ± 47.3 N⋅m (range, 99.3-311.5 N⋅m) and 89.8 ± 21.0 N⋅m (range, 51.8-137.2 N⋅m) for flexors. For women, the body mass normalized torque for extensors was 2.20 ± 0.51 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 1.22-3.74 N⋅m.kg-1) and 1.04 ± 0.26 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 0.41-1.50 N⋅m.kg-1) for flexors. For men, the normalized torque for extensors was 2.74 ± 0.58 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 1.51-4.08 N⋅m.kg-1) and 1.24 ± 0.30 N⋅m.kg-1 (range, 0.64-2.05 N⋅m.kg-1) for flexors.

Conclusions

This study provides absolute and normalized normative values of maximal isometric torque measured at 80° of knee flexion for extensors and flexors in a series of healthy trained subjects practicing activities at risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. The considerable level of interlimb asymmetry and the weak association between dominance and strength observed in uninjured subjects call into question the classical use of contralateral side as reference for injured patients.

Clinical Relevance

Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are the most represented subjects using isokinetic dynamometers in many sport medicine and rehabilitation departments. Clinicians need reference values to compare patients with ACL injuries with comparable healthy subjects. This study may provide this information.

Changes in the Force-Velocity Relationship of Knee Muscles After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Isokinetic 2-Point Model

PURPOSE

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), knee muscle strength symmetry is used as part of the return-to-sport criteria. However, little is known about the changes in the force-velocity (F-V) relationship, which could affect athletic performance. This study investigated the F-V relationship of knee muscles at 4 and 8 months after ACL-R, using the 2-point method tested by isokinetic dynamometry.

METHODS

A total of 103 physically trained individuals (24.6 [9.3] y, 59.2% male) who underwent primary ACL-R were included. Demographic information and surgery characteristics were collected at 6 weeks postoperatively. Isokinetic knee flexors' and extensors' peak torques were measured at 60° and 240° per second in the concentric mode at 4 and 8 months postoperative. Peak torques and angular velocities were converted to force and linear velocity for calculating maximum isometric force (F0) and the slope of the regression line (F-V slope).

RESULTS

At 4 and 8 months postoperative, F0 was significantly lower and F-V slope was significantly less steep (less negative) on the operated leg compared with the nonoperated leg for knee extensors (P < .001) and flexors (P < .001-.002). The limb symmetry index calculated using F0 was lower than the limb symmetry indexes assessed at 60° and 240° per second, especially for knee flexors (P < .001). The use of patellar tendon grafts was associated with lower F0 and a less steep F-V slope compared with hamstring tendon grafts (P < .010).

CONCLUSION

The isokinetic 2-point model assessing the F-V relationship provides additional and relevant insight for evaluating knee muscle strength after ACL-R.

Total Score of Athleticism: Profiling Strength and Power Characteristics in Professional Soccer Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction to Assess Readiness to Return to Sport

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the optimal testing procedure to determine return-to-sport (RTS) readiness after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Current approaches use limb symmetry across a range of tests, but this does not consider a patient's level of athleticism or benchmarks relative to his or her noninjured counterparts.

PURPOSE

To examine the utility of the Total Score of Athleticism (TSA), a composite scale including strength, power, and reactive strength assessments, to aid RTS decision-making.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 95 professional soccer players (60 who underwent ACL reconstruction [mean age, 25.1 ± 12.6 years] and 35 who were uninjured [mean age, 23.8 ± 2.8 years]) completed a battery of tests including isokinetic knee extension and flexion torque, bilateral and unilateral countermovement jump height, relative peak power, and reactive strength index-modified. The TSA score (derived from Z scores) was calculated, and we (1) examined differences between the ACL-reconstructed and uninjured groups at the time of RTS, (2) assessed the predictive ability of the TSA to identify the player's status (ACL reconstruction vs uninjured control), and (3) included a case series to discuss the characteristics of players who sustained a subsequent injury within 4 months after RTS.

RESULTS

A large difference between the ACL-reconstructed and uninjured groups in the TSA score (d = 0.84; P < .0001) was evident. For every additional increase of 1 unit in the TSA score, the odds of belonging to the ACL-reconstructed group decreased by 74% (95% CI, 0.19-0.56). By visual inspection, the frequency of reinjured players was higher in the low (4/7) TSA tertile compared with the medium (2/7) and high (1/7) TSA tertiles.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence indicates that the TSA may be a useful RTS readiness tool, as the composite score derived from strength and power measures was different in soccer players at the time of RTS after ACL reconstruction compared with healthy matched controls. There was also a higher frequency of low TSA scores in players who sustained a second injury after RTS. Therefore, it is recommended to routinely administer RTS tests encompassing strength, power, and reactive strength qualities each season across the largest possible number of players (ideally teammates).

Evaluation of the Back-in-Action test Battery In Uninjured High School American Football Players

Background

Return to sport testing is an established routine, especially for athletes who have ruptured their anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Various tests are performed, often combined in test batteries, such as the Back-in-action (BIA) test battery. Unfortunately, pre-injury performance is often unknown, and only few athletes pass the high demands of these test batteries.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to determine the performance of under 18 American football players on the BIA to establish pre-injury sport specific benchmarks for future RTS testing and to compare these values to data from an age-matched reference group.

Methods

Fifty-three healthy male American football players underwent a functional assessment using the "Back-in-action" test battery evaluating agility, speed (Parkour-Jumps and Quick-Feet test), balance (using a PC based balance board), and power (Counter-Movement-Jump [CMJ]) as objective measures. Their results were compared with a previously tested reference group (RP) and within the american football players (AF) through three subgroups according to field playing position.

Results

Overall, the American football (AF) athletes showed lower balance scores for both legs (AF: 3.71/3.57/3.61; RP: 3.4/3.2/3.2; p<0.002) compared to the reference population (RP). CMJ height and Quick-Feet results were not statistically different (p>0.05), Parkour-Jump times (AF: 8.18/ 8.13 sec.; RP: 5.9/5.9sec.; p<0.001) were significantly slower. Power output in all CMJ's (AF: 46.86/36.94/37.36 W/kg; RP: 43.2/29.5/29 W/kg; p<0.001) was significantly higher than the RP. Passing and running game involved players (G2 & G3) showed significantly better balance scores (G2+G3: 3.36/3.27/3.33; G1: 4.22/4.06/4.10; p<0.001), higher jump height (G2&G3: 38.87/24.02/24.96 cm; G1: 32.03/19.50/18.96 cm; p<0.001) and more watts/kg (G2&G3: 48.83/37.21/37.64 W/kg; G1: 43.95/36.88/36.53 W/kg; p<0.001) compared to blocking players like Linemen (G1) and to the age matched reference population (RP).

Conclusion

Only 53% of the healthy athletes would have been cleared for sport using the BIA test criteria, which highlights the challenging passing criteria. Despite significantly greater power measurements, scores of balance and agility were poorer compared to the reference group, especially for linemen. These data may serve as sport and position specific reference for high school American football players, instead of using the non-specific reference group data.

Study design

cross-sectional study.

Level of evidence

IIb.