Spatial relationships among hemodynamic, anatomic, and biochemical plaque characteristics in patients with coronary artery disease

Spatial patterns of high-risk biomechanical metrics in plaques with abnormal vs. normal physiological flow indices

BACKGROUND

Plaques associated with abnormally low physiological flow reserve indices are appropriate for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, recent trials demonstrate that PCI of ischemia-producing lesions does not reduce major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Low endothelial shear stress (ESS) or high ESS gradient (ESSG) are associated with MACE wherever they occur along the plaque. This study aims to determine the presence of high-risk ESS metrics in obstructive coronary plaques with high-risk (<0.80) vs. borderline-risk (0.80-0.89) vs. normal Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio (iFR) (>0.89).

METHODS

We included 50 coronary arteries (50 patients) with variable iFR values who underwent coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), followed by 3D reconstruction and computational fluid dynamics calculations of ESS/ESSG. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: iFR < 0.80, iFR 0.80-0.89, and iFR > 0.89. Spatial distribution of ESS metrics was reported along the course of each plaque, and high-risk ESS metrics and their location were compared among the 3 iFR subgroups.

RESULTS

High-risk ESS features (Minimal ESS, Maximum ESSG) were similarly distributed along the course of the atherosclerotic plaque in the three iFR subgroups, both in absolute value and in location: Min ESS: 0.5 ± 0.3 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2 Pa respectively (p = 0.60); Max ESSG any direction: 13.7 ± 9.4 vs. 10.4 ± 10.6 vs. 10.0 ± 7.8 Pa/mm respectively (p = 0.30). ESS metrics were spatially located up to ≥18 mm from the plaque minimal luminal area (MLA) in both directions.

CONCLUSION

High-risk ESS metrics are similarly observed in plaques with normal or abnormal iFR, both in absolute value and spatial location in reference to the MLA. Utilizing iFR to identify plaques likely to cause MACE would miss the majority of plaques mechanistically at high-risk to destabilize and cause future adverse cardiac events.

Lipid Content Distribution and its Clinical Implication in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction-Plaque Erosion: Results from the Prospective OCTAMI Study

AIMS

Plaque erosion (PE) is one of the main plaque phenotypes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the underlying plaque component and distribution have not been systematically analysed. This study aims to investigate the distribution of lipid and calcium content in culprit lesions assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with PE and explore its relationship with prognosis in a cohort of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 576 patients with STEMI was enrolled in our study. After exclusion, 152 PE patients with clear underlying plaque components were ultimately analysed. The culprit lesion was divided into the border zone, external erosion zone and erosion site in the longitudinal view. Each pullback of the culprit lesions was assessed by 3 independent investigators frame-by-frame, and the quantity and distribution of lipid and calcium components were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 152 PE patients, lipid and calcium contents were more likely to exist in the external erosion zone than in the other regions. In particular, a high level of lipid content proximal to the erosion site was significantly associated with plaque vulnerability and a higher incidence of MACEs.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that high level of lipid content in the proximal external erosion zone was related to high-risk plaque characteristics and poor prognosis, which provided a novel method for risk stratification and precise management in patients with plaque erosion.

Coronary Physiology-Based Approaches for Plaque Vulnerability: Implications for Risk Prediction and Treatment Strategies

In the catheterization laboratory, the measurement of physiological indexes can help identify functionally significant lesions and has become one of the standard methods to guide treatment decision-making. Plaque vulnerability refers to a coronary plaque susceptible to rupture, enabling risk prediction before coronary events, and it can be detected by defining a certain type of plaque morphology on coronary imaging modalities. Although coronary physiology and plaque vulnerability have been considered different attributes of coronary artery disease, the underlying pathophysiological basis and clinical data indicate a strong correlation between coronary hemodynamic properties and vulnerable plaque. In prediction of coronary events, emerging data have suggested independent and additional implications of a physiology-based approach to a plaque-based approach. This review covers the fundamental interplay between coronary physiology and plaque morphology during disease progression with clinical data supporting this relationship and examines the clinical relevance of physiological indexes in prediction of clinical outcomes and therapeutic decision-making along with plaque vulnerability.

Heterogeneous plaque-lumen geometry is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events

Aims

Prospective studies show that only a minority of plaques with higher risk features develop future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), indicating the need for more predictive markers. Biomechanical estimates such as plaque structural stress (PSS) improve risk prediction but require expert analysis. In contrast, complex and asymmetric coronary geometry is associated with both unstable presentation and high PSS, and can be estimated quickly from imaging. We examined whether plaque-lumen geometric heterogeneity evaluated from intravascular ultrasound affects MACE and incorporating geometric parameters enhances plaque risk stratification.

Methods and results

We examined plaque-lumen curvature, irregularity, lumen aspect ratio (LAR), roughness, PSS, and their heterogeneity indices (HIs) in 44 non-culprit lesions (NCLs) associated with MACE and 84 propensity-matched no-MACE-NCLs from the PROSPECT study. Plaque geometry HI were increased in MACE-NCLs vs. no-MACE-NCLs across whole plaque and peri-minimal luminal area (MLA) segments (HI curvature: adjusted P = 0.024; HI irregularity: adjusted P = 0.002; HI LAR: adjusted P = 0.002; HI roughness: adjusted P = 0.004). Peri-MLA HI roughness was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 3.21, P < 0.001). Inclusion of HI roughness significantly improved the identification of MACE-NCLs in thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA, P < 0.001), or with MLA ≤ 4 mm2 (P < 0.001), or plaque burden (PB) ≥ 70% (P < 0.001), and further improved the ability of PSS to identify MACE-NCLs in TCFA (P = 0.008), or with MLA ≤ 4 mm2 (P = 0.047), and PB ≥ 70% (P = 0.003) lesions.

Conclusion

Plaque-lumen geometric heterogeneity is increased in MACE vs. no-MACE-NCLs, and inclusion of geometric heterogeneity improves the ability of imaging to predict MACE. Assessment of geometric parameters may provide a simple method of plaque risk stratification.

Fundamental Pathobiology of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Clinical Implications for Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease Management-The Plaque Hypothesis: A Narrative Review

Importance

Recent clinical and imaging studies underscore that major adverse cardiac events (MACE) outcomes are associated not solely with severe coronary obstructions (ischemia hypothesis or stenosis hypothesis), but with the plaque burden along the entire coronary tree. New research clarifies the pathobiologic mechanisms responsible for plaque development/progression/destabilization leading to MACE (plaque hypothesis), but the translation of these insights to clinical management strategies has lagged. This narrative review elaborates the plaque hypothesis and explicates the current understanding of underlying pathobiologic mechanisms, the provocative destabilizing influences, the diagnostic and therapeutic implications, and their actionable clinical management approaches to optimize the management of patients with chronic coronary disease.

Observations

Clinical trials of management strategies for patients with chronic coronary artery disease demonstrate that while MACE rate increases progressively with the anatomic extent of coronary disease, revascularization of the ischemia-producing obstruction does not forestall MACE. Most severely obstructive coronary lesions often remain quiescent and seldom destabilize to cause a MACE. Coronary lesions that later provoke acute myocardial infarction often do not narrow the lumen critically. Invasive and noninvasive imaging can identify the plaque anatomic characteristics (plaque burden, plaque topography, lipid content) and local hemodynamic/biomechanical characteristics (endothelial shear stress, plaque structural stress, axial plaque stress) that can indicate the propensity of individual plaques to provoke a MACE.

Conclusions and Relevance

The pathobiologic construct concerning the culprit region of a plaque most likely to cause a MACE (plaque hypothesis), which incorporates multiple convergent plaque features, informs the evolution of a new management strategy capable of identifying the high-risk portion of plaque wherever it is located along the course of the coronary artery. Ongoing investigations of high-risk plaque features, coupled with technical advances to enable prognostic characterization in real time and at the point of care, will soon enable evaluation of the entire length of the atheromatous coronary artery and broaden the target(s) of our therapeutic intervention to include all regions of the plaque (both flow limiting and nonflow limiting).

Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes and stable ischemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

AIMS

The optimal treatment strategy comparing invasive revascularization versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) still remains unclear. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes of invasive revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or both) versus OMT in patients with DM and SIHD from updated published randomised-controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed and EMBASE to investigate the effect of revascularization versus OMT for patients with DM and SIHD. The studies were limited to RCTs or their subgroup data for a meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with DM and SIHD.

RESULTS

Our search identified subgroup data with DM of four RCTs including a total of 5742 patients with SIHD. Our results showed that invasive revascularization was not associated with a decreased risk of MACE when compared to OMT [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.95 (0.85-1.05), P = 0.31; I2 = 0%].

CONCLUSION

Invasive revascularization was not associated with a decreased risk of MACE when compared with OMT.

Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA Trial Based on Coronary Artery Disease and Ischemia Severity

BACKGROUND

The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) postulated that patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and moderate or severe ischemia would benefit from revascularization. We investigated the relationship between severity of CAD and ischemia and trial outcomes, overall and by management strategy.

METHODS

In total, 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia were randomized to an initial invasive or conservative management strategy. Blinded, core laboratory-interpreted coronary computed tomographic angiography was used to assess anatomic eligibility for randomization. Extent and severity of CAD were classified with the modified Duke Prognostic Index (n=2475, 48%). Ischemia severity was interpreted by independent core laboratories (nuclear, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, exercise tolerance testing, n=5105, 99%). We compared 4-year event rates across subgroups defined by severity of ischemia and CAD. The primary end point for this analysis was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death or MI, and the trial primary end point (cardiovascular death, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest).

RESULTS

Relative to mild/no ischemia, neither moderate ischemia nor severe ischemia was associated with increased mortality (moderate ischemia hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.61-1.30]; severe ischemia HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.57-1.21]; P=0.33). Nonfatal MI rates increased with worsening ischemia severity (HR for moderate ischemia, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.86-1.69] versus mild/no ischemia; HR for severe ischemia, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.98-1.91]; P=0.04 for trend, P=NS after adjustment for CAD). Increasing CAD severity was associated with death (HR, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.06-6.98]) and MI (HR, 3.78 [95% CI, 1.63-8.78]) for the most versus least severe CAD subgroup. Ischemia severity did not identify a subgroup with treatment benefit on mortality, MI, the trial primary end point, or cardiovascular death or MI. In the most severe CAD subgroup (n=659), the 4-year rate of cardiovascular death or MI was lower in the invasive strategy group (difference, 6.3% [95% CI, 0.2%-12.4%]), but 4-year all-cause mortality was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemia severity was not associated with increased risk after adjustment for CAD severity. More severe CAD was associated with increased risk. Invasive management did not lower all-cause mortality at 4 years in any ischemia or CAD subgroup. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01471522.