Effects of different lipoprotein apheresis methods on serum protein levels

Use of therapeutic plasma exchange to remove lipoprotein X in a patient with vanishing bile duct syndrome presenting with cholestasis, pseudohyponatremia, and hypercholesterolemia: A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Lipoprotein X (Lp-X) is an abnormal lipoprotein found in multiple disease conditions, including liver dysfunction and cholestasis. High Lp-X concentrations can interfere with some laboratory testing that may result in spurious results. The detection of Lp-X can be challenging, and there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the management of Lp-X other than treating the underlying disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 42-year-old female with Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with dexamethasone, high dose cytarabine and cisplatin and vanishing bile duct syndrome confirmed by liver biopsy presented with cholestasis, pseudohyponatremia (sodium, 113 mmol/L; reference range 136-146 mmL/L; serum osmolality, 303 mOsm/kg), and hypercholesterolemia (> 2800 mg/dL, reference range < 200 mg/dL). Lp-X was confirmed by lipoprotein electrophoresis (EP). Although she did not manifest any specific signs or symptoms, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was initiated based on laboratory findings of extreme hypercholesterolemia, spuriously abnormal serum sodium, and HDL values, and the potential for short- and long-term sequelae such as hyperviscosity syndrome, xanthoma, and neuropathy. During the hospitalization, she was treated with four 1.0 plasma volume TPE over 6 days using 5% albumin for replacement fluid. After the first TPE, total cholesterol (TC) decreased to 383 mg/dL and sodium was measured at 131 mmol/L. The patient was transitioned into outpatient maintenance TPE to eliminate the potential of Lp-X reappearance while the underlying disease was treated. Serial follow-up laboratory testing with lipoprotein EP showed the disappearance of Lp-X after nine TPEs over a 10-week period.

LITERATURE REVIEW

There are seven and four case reports of Lp-X treated with TPE and lipoprotein apheresis (LA), respectively. While all previous case reports showed a reduction in TC levels, none had monitored the disappearance of Lp-X after completing a course of therapeutic apheresis.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should have a heightened suspicion for the presence of abnormal Lp-X in patients with cholestasis, hypercholesterolemia, and pseudohyponatremia. Once Lp-X is confirmed by lipoprotein EP, TPE should be initiated to reduce TC level and remove abnormal Lp-X. Most LA techniques are not expected to be beneficial since Lp-X lacks apolipoprotein B. Therefore, we suggest that inpatient course of TPE be performed every other day until serum sodium, TC and HDL levels become normalized. Outpatient maintenance TPE may also be considered to keep Lp-X levels low while the underlying disease is treated. Serum sodium, TC, and HDL levels should be monitored while on maintenance TPE.

Clinical improvement of Long-COVID is associated with reduction in autoantibodies, lipids, and inflammation following therapeutic apheresis

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are witnessing an unprecedented wave of post-infectious complications. Most prominently, millions of patients with Long-Covid complain about chronic fatigue and severe post-exertional malaise. Therapeutic apheresis has been suggested as an efficient treatment option for alleviating and mitigating symptoms in this desperate group of patients. However, little is known about the mechanisms and biomarkers correlating with treatment outcomes. Here, we have analyzed in different cohorts of Long-Covid patients specific biomarkers before and after therapeutic apheresis. In patients that reported a significant improvement following two cycles of therapeutic apheresis, there was a significant reduction in neurotransmitter autoantibodies, lipids, and inflammatory markers. Furthermore, we observed a 70% reduction in fibrinogen, and following apheresis, erythrocyte rouleaux formation and fibrin fibers largely disappeared as demonstrated by dark field microscopy. This is the first study demonstrating a pattern of specific biomarkers with clinical symptoms in this patient group. It may therefore form the basis for a more objective monitoring and a clinical score for the treatment of Long-Covid and other postinfectious syndromes.

Comparison of plasma separation using centrifugation or filtration for MONET lipoprotein apheresis in patients with cardiovascular disease and severe dyslipidemia

INTRODUCTION

Homozygous or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels may be treated with membrane filtration. The MONET system (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) involves plasma separation by centrifugation or filtration.

METHODS

Whether the method of plasma separation affects lipoprotein lowering and treatment safety was investigated in a single-center retrospective study.

RESULTS

The centrifugation-based plasma separation achieved a higher plasma flow and shorter time to treat 1 L of plasma (46.2 ± 8.6 min), than the filtration-based system (71.5 ± 40.0 min; p = 0.001). The mean reduction of LDL-cholesterol was 69% and 67% with centrifugation and filtration and was 75% for lipoprotein(a) with both plasma separation methods. A reduction of IgM by more than 60%, of albumin and total protein by approximately 20% and low frequency of side effects was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of lowering atherogenic lipoproteins was comparable with both plasma separation methods. Centrifugation was more time-efficient compared to filtration.

Post COVID and Apheresis - Where are we Standing?

A continual increase in cases of Long/Post COVID constitutes a medical and socioeconomic challenge to health systems around the globe. While the true extent of this problem cannot yet be fully evaluated, recent data suggest that up to 20% of people with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 suffer from clinically relevant symptoms of Long/Post COVID several weeks to months after the acute phase. The clinical presentation is highly variable with the main symptoms being chronic fatigue, dyspnea, and cognitive symptoms. Extracorporeal apheresis has been suggested to alleviate symptoms of Post/COVID. Thus, numerous patients are currently treated with apheresis. However, at present there is no data from randomized controlled trials available to confirm the efficacy. Therefore, physicians rely on the experience of practitioners and centers performing this treatment. Here, we summarize clinical experience on extracorporeal apheresis in patients with Post/COVID from centers across Germany.

COVID-19 and Therapeutic Apheresis

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is an unprecedented challenge for the global community. The pathogenesis of COVID-19, its complications and long term sequelae (so called Long/Post-COVID) include, in addition to the direct virus-induced tissues injury, multiple secondary processes, such as autoimmune response, impairment of microcirculation, and hyperinflammation. Similar pathological processes, but in the settings of neurological, cardiovascular, rheumatological, nephrological, and dermatological diseases can be successfully treated by powerful methods of Therapeutic Apheresis (TA). We describe here the rationale and the initial attempts of TA treatment in severe cases of acute COVID-19. We next review the evidence for the role of autoimmunity, microcirculatory changes and inflammation in pathogenesis of Long/Post COVID and the rationale for targeting those pathogenic processes by different methods of TA. Finally, we discuss the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients, who undergo regular TA treatments due to their underlying chronic conditions, with the specific focus on the patients with inherited lipid diseases being treated at the Dresden University Apheresis Center.

[Lipoprotein apheresis : State of the art and case report of the longest HELP treatment worldwide]

Lipoprotein apheresis is an extracorporeal procedure for the treatment of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, patients with severe treatment-resistant hypercholesterolemia and patients with lipoprotein(a) hypercholesterolemia, who show progressive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease despite optimal treatment. This article reports on the historical developments of the procedures, the most frequently used methods for apheresis as well as the data situation on efficacy and tolerability. Randomized prospective studies on clinical outcomes are not available. Furthermore, the article reports on a patient with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and 34 years of treatment with heparin-induced extracorporeal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) precipitation (HELP) apheresis, the longest treatment of this kind worldwide. A second patient with combined heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and 31 years of liposorber and HELP apheresis is also described. The observational studies and the case reports demonstrate the safety and long-term tolerability of the procedure.

Fibrinogen reconstitution after therapeutic apheresis: Comparison of double-filtration plasmapheresis, plasma exchange, and immunoadsorption

BACKGROUND

Fibrinogen reconstitution after therapeutic apheresis has been poorly studied. Apheresis modalities, for example, plasma exchange (PE), double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), or selective immunoadsorption (IA), may have different impacts.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated therapeutic apheresis sessions performed at our center across four modalities (PE, DFPP, and IA with or without plasma filtration). Fibrinogen levels were assessed at the beginning and end of each apheresis session, and immediately before the subsequent session. We adjusted measurements on hematocrit values to account for hemoconcentration.

RESULTS

Between January 10, 2016 and March 2, 2020, we included 90 patients for a total of 754 apheresis sessions (PE: 35; DFPP: 351; IA only: 109; IA + plasma filtration: 259). Each patient received a median of five sessions (1Q 3; 3Q 9); median plasma volume treated was 5.5 L (1Q 4.3 L; 3Q 7.0 L). Within a session, DFPP and PE induced a significantly greater depletion of fibrinogen than both IA modalities, even after adjustment for the treated plasma volume. Median fibrinogen reconstitution was 0.8 (0.4-1.2) g/L (median time between sessions: 38 hours). In multivariate analysis, fibrinogen reconstitution was significantly associated with intersession time (+0.66 g/L/log-hour P < .001), apheresis modality (ANOVA; P < .001), initial fibrinogen concentration (+0.15 g/L per gram of fibrinogen; P < .001), and the last fibrinogen concentration from the previous apheresis session (-0.14 g/L per gram of fibrinogen; P < .001). In a model that considered hemoconcentration, the results were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that fibrinogen reconstitution was highly variable between patients and apheresis sessions. Apheresis modalities had a significant impact on fibrinogen reconstitution, regardless of hemoconcentration.

Improvement of oxidative stress status by lipoprotein apheresis in Chinese patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) characterized by severe high blood cholesterol levels usually presents an imbalance of systemic oxidative stress (OS). Lipoprotein apheresis (LA), which is the most effective therapy to reduce cholesterol levels, remains unclear in altering OS and scarce in Chinese patient studies. Our study aims to assess the impact of LA on OS status in Chinese patients with FH.

METHODS

About 31 patients (22 males, age: 12-69 years) with FH and receiving LA treatment were consecutive enrolled. Free oxygen radicals test (FORT) and free oxygen radicals defense (FORD) values were determined using the free oxygen radical monitor and kit immediately before and after LA, while blood samples were collected to measure plasma lipid levels and hs-CRP by conventional methods. Data were analyzed by paired t test or rank sum test and Spearman-rho correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Besides plasma lipid levels, the OS status showed that FORTs were significantly decreased and FORD values significantly enhanced immediately after LA treatment compared with before (both P < .01). In addition, the correlation analysis showed that the removal rates (△%) of TC were positively related to the increased rates (△%) of FORD value (ρ = 0.513, P = .003); LDL-C to FORD (ρ = 0.39, P = .03); Lp(a) to FORD (ρ = 0.473, P = .007); and non-HDL-C to FORD (ρ = 0.46, P = .009). However, no significant difference in hsCRP was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicated, besides effectively lowering plasma lipid levels, LA could significantly improve OS status in Chinese patients with FH.

Short- and long-term effects of lipoprotein apheresis on plasma hormones in patients with therapy-resistant dyslipidemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a highly effective method to improve the clinical and metabolic situation in patients with therapy-resistant disorders of lipid metabolism. Cholesterol is the substrate for the synthesis of all steroid hormones. If repeated massive reduction of LDL-cholesterol may interfere with human adrenal steroidogenesis, and could become clinically relevant is unknown, so far. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine possible short- and long-term effects of LA on blood plasma levels of ACTH, cortisol, aldosterone, DHEAS, renin and testosterone.

METHODS

In total, 39 patients, treated with one of four LA techniques were studied: 1. Lipid Filtration (LF; n = 7), 2. Dextran Sulfate Adsorption (DSA; n = 7), 3. Membrane Filtration Optimised Novel Extracorporeal Treatment (MONET; n = 8), and 4. Direct Absorption of Lipoproteins (DALI; n = 15). Hormone levels were analyzed before and after five LA sessions with an interval of 20 weeks covering a total observation time of two years. In addition patients were comprehensively characterized by clinical and laboratory data.

RESULTS

Patients treated with LA revealed an acute reduction of steroid hormones and ACTH, independent of apheresis technology but no long-term insufficiency in steroidogenesis was observed. Plasma renin levels were stable in LF patients and were highly elevated in patients under DSA, MONET and DALI apheresis throughout the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, these data suggest that although different LA techniques considerably differ in their acute effects on hormone levels during LA, they did not alter long-term hormone levels sustainably.

Lipoprotein apheresis - Shortening of treatment intervals reduces cardiovascular events: Case reports

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein (Lp-) apheresis is a life-long therapy, usually performed in weekly intervals. In some cases, however, atherosclerotic disease progresses despite adequate therapy with weekly Lp-apheresis and maximal lipid lowering medication. In an attempt to improve the effectiveness of therapy, we temporarily shortened treatment intervals of Lp-apheresis in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and further progression of coronary atherosclerosis despite weekly Lp-apheresis and maximal lipid lowering medication.

METHODS

We illustrate three case reports of patients with elevated Lp(a), who underwent regular weekly Lp-apheresis treatment for secondary prevention. The intensified treatment protocol contained three therapies in two weeks (alternating 2 per week and 1 per week).

RESULTS

The shortening of treatment intervals achieved a stabilization of atherosclerotic disease in case 1. After a total of 68 therapies in 52 weeks (1.31 sessions/week) the elective coronary angiography revealed excellent long-term results. In case 2, the intensified treatment protocol is still ongoing. The patient reported a decrease in angina pectoris and an increase in exercise capacity since the beginning of more frequent therapy sessions. In some cases, as it is shown in case 3, a fast decision for shortening the treatment intervals is necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

The intensified treatment regimen resulted in an improvement in clinical symptoms and no further progression of atherosclerosis. In conclusion, shorter therapeutic Lp-apheresis intervals, at least temporarily, should be considered in patients who suffer from clinical and/or angiographic progression of atherosclerosis, despite maximal lipid lowering medication and weekly Lp-apheresis.

Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with the induction and sustaining of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Since 2008 Lp(a) along with progressive CVD has been approved as an indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany. The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) has been initiated to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures to treat dyslipidemia for both LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a). The GLAR now allows prospective investigations over a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. Here Lp(a) patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl; Lp(a) > 60 mg/dl or >120 nmol/l) showed the same reduction of major coronary (83%) and non-coronary events (63%) as had been formerly shown in the Pro(a)LiFe study. However, Lp(a) is not only an apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) and LDL-C containing particle, which is covalently bound to a LDL-C core by a disulphide bridge. The composition of this particle, inter alia containing oxidized phospholipids, gives pro-atherosclerotic, pro-inflammatory, and pro-thrombotic properties, inducing atherosclerotic processes mainly in the arterial wall. However, recent investigations have shown that a reduction of inflammatory settings without LDL-C or Lp(a) reduction may reduce ASCVD events. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) could not only reduce LDL-C and Lp(a) in parallel, but also different inflammatory and coagulation parameters. In summary lipoprotein apheresis is not only anti-atherosclerotic, but also anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic and therefore an ideal treatment option with respect to the shown reduction of major adverse coronary events (MACE) and major adverse non-coronary events (MANCE) by reducing Lp(a) levels.

Current Role of Lipoprotein Apheresis in the Treatment of High-Risk Patients

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a therapeutic approach to save the lives of patients who are at an extremely high risk of developing cardiovascular events (CVE), especially after all other therapeutic options were not tolerated, or appeared not to be effective enough. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia represents a clear indication to start LA therapy. Another recognized indication is a severe hypercholesterolemia, which induced CVE, often in association with other risk factors. In the last years, an expressive elevation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) emerged as an indication for LA. In Germany, progress of atherosclerosis should have been documented before the permission to start LA therapy is given in these patients. Usually, all LA methods acutely decrease both LDL-C and Lp(a). However, specific columns which reduce only Lp(a) are available. Case reports and prospective observations comparing the situation before and during LA therapy clearly show a high efficiency with respect to the reduction of CVE, especially in patients with high Lp(a) levels. PCSK9 inhibitors may reduce the need for LA in patients with heterozygous or polygenetic hypercholesterolemia, but in some patients, a combination of these drugs with LA will be necessary. In the future, an antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) may offer an alternative therapeutic approach.

Long-term follow-up of circulating oxidative stress markers in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis by Direct Adsorption of Lipids (DALI)

OBJECTIVE

Beyond its well-established efficacy in lowering atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins, DALI (Direct Adsorption of Lipids) apheresis has been shown to have acute anti-inflammatory and endothelium-protective effects. In the present study, we investigated long-term effects of DALI procedures on circulating oxidative stress markers.

METHODS

Thirteen patients involved in the study underwent regular DALI apheresis for nearly two years. At sessions 1, 40 and 80 conventional lipid status and changes of systemic oxidative stress markers (oxidized LDL, anti-oxidized LDL antibodies, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and myeloperoxidase (MPO)) were examined.

RESULTS

DALI procedure efficiently reduced atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins. On day three after apheresis lipid parameters returned to pre-apheresis values. They showed no tendency to increase or to decrease over time. No significant differences were found between 1st, 40th and 80th sessions. In a similar way, levels of oxidative stress biomarkers acutely decreased after apheresis sessions and rebounded on day three after apheresis. No significant differences were observed between sessions 1, 40, and 80.

CONCLUSION

DALI apheresis repeatedly decreases atherogenic lipid/lipoprotein profile and oxidative stress biomarker levels during each session. Among all investigated parameters no longitudinal effects over two years could be observed.

Specific Lp(a) apheresis: A tool to prove lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity

BACKGROUND

An elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) level is observed in more than 30% of patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). We conducted an investigation of the effects of specific Lp(a) apheresis on the progression of atherosclerosis in SIHD patients with Lp(a) levels greater than 50 mg/dL.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 15 patients diagnosed with SIHD based on symptom-driven coronary angiography findings, with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL and a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤2.5 mmol/L, who were on long-term statin therapy. They underwent weekly Lp(a) apheresis using Lp(a) Lipopak^® adsorption columns which contain monospecific sheep polyclonal antibodies against human Lp(a). Fifteen age and gender matched SIHD patients receiving atorvastatin monotherapy served as controls. At baseline and 18 months post-treatment, quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary ultrasound with virtual histology and carotid ultrasound were performed. Lipid profile, including Lp(a), was measured at the scheduled visits, and before and after each apheresis procedure. Levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-7 and 9, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 and 2 were determined at baseline and at the end of the study period.

RESULTS

Each specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure was carried out with two adsorption columns resulting in an average acute decrease in Lp(a) levels of 75% (from 110 ± 22 to 29 ± 16 mg/dL) without significant changes in other plasma components. Lp(a) reduction over the course of 18 months was associated with a decrease in the mean percent diameter stenosis of 5.05% and an increase in minimal lumen diameter of 14%; the mean total atheroma volume was reduced by 4.60 mm³ (p < 0.05 for all). There was a decrease in absolute common carotid intima-media thickness in the Lp(a) apheresis group of 0.07 ± 0.15 mm both from baseline and compared with the control group (p = 0.01). Levels of hsCRP were reduced by 40% in patients on Lp(a) apheresis without significant changes in the levels of other biomarkers at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of the atherosclerotic burden in coronary and carotid arteries was observed in patients treated with specific Lp(a) apheresis and statin over 18 months compared with statin therapy alone. These findings support the atherogenic role of Lp(a) and reinforce the need to assess the effects of Lp(a)-lowering on cardiovascular events and mortality. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02133807).

Lipoprotein apheresis in the management of severe hypercholesterolemia and of elevation of lipoprotein(a): current perspectives and patient selection

This review reports the current situation with respect to therapeutic options (lifestyle and drugs) reducing the concentrations of atherogenic low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]). Three lipoprotein apheresis (LA) principles have been realized: precipitation, filtration, and adsorption. Available LA methods are herein described in detail - major components, pumps, extracorporeal volume, treated volume, and anticoagulation. General features of all LA methods as well as pleotropic effects are elaborated. Indications for LA therapy are quoted: homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HCH), severe HCH, and isolated elevation of Lp(a) and progress of atherosclerotic disease. A major focus is on the evidence of the effect of LA on cardiovascular outcome data, and the most important publications are cited in this context. The best studies have been performed in patients with elevated Lp(a) in whom cardiovascular events were reduced by more than 80%. Major adverse effects and contraindications are listed. The impact of an LA therapy on patient quality of life and the requirements they have to fulfill are also highlighted. Finally, the future role of LA in treating high-risk patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp(a) is discussed. It is probable that the significance of LA for treating patients with elevated LDL-C will decrease (with the exception of homozygous familial HCH) due to the application of PCSK9 inhibitors. The antisense oligonucleotide against apolipoprotein(a) could replace LA in patients with high Lp(a), provided positive outcome data are generated.