The Elephant Trunk Technique for Staged Repair of Complex Aneurysms of the Entire Thoracic Aorta

Aortic diameter remodeling after frozen elephant trunk as a predictor of early outcomes in thoracoabdominal aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Patients who underwent previous frozen elephant trunk implantation for Stanford type A aortic dissection remain at risk for secondary intervention due to unsuccessful distal aortic remodeling. We aimed to investigate the impact of distal aortic remodeling on early outcomes in patients who underwent 2-stage thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients who previously underwent frozen elephant trunk implantation and thoracoabdominal aortic repair between October 2014 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The extent of distal aortic remodeling was evaluated, including aortic diameter, area ratio of the false lumen/aortic lumen, and patency of the false lumen at 3 levels of the aorta. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for early outcomes.

RESULTS

The aortic diameter at the distal frozen elephant trunk was significantly larger in patients who died early than in surviving patients (79.19 ± 22.89 mm vs 46.84 ± 19.17 mm, respectively, adjusted P = .001). The optimal cutoff value for the aortic diameter at the distal frozen elephant trunk was 60 mm. Patients with an aortic diameter 60 mm or more at the distal frozen elephant trunk had worse early outcomes (P < .05), including prolonged intubation, early death, and postoperative complications. The aortic diameter at the distal frozen elephant trunk was identified as a significant risk factor for early death in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic repair with an aortic diameter 60 mm or more at the distal frozen elephant trunk have worse early outcomes. Moreover, an aortic diameter at the distal frozen elephant trunk is a significant risk factor for early death in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Total aortic arch replacement using a frozen elephant trunk device: Results of a 1-year US multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective US investigational device exemption trial, we assessed the safety and 1-year clinical outcomes of the Thoraflex Hybrid device (Terumo Aortic) for the frozen elephant trunk technique to repair the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta.

METHODS

For the trial, which involved 12 US sites, 65 patients without rupture were recruited into the primary study group, and 9 patients were recruited into the rupture group. All patients underwent open surgical repair of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta in cases of aneurysm and/or dissection. The primary end point was freedom from major adverse events (MAE), defined as permanent stroke, permanent paraplegia/paraparesis, unanticipated aortic-related reoperation (excluding reoperation for bleeding), or all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In the primary study group, 2 patients were lost to follow-up at 1 year. Freedom from MAE at 1 year was 81% (51/63). Seven patients (11%) died (including 2 before 30 days or discharge), 3 patients (5%) suffered permanent stroke, and 3 (5%) developed permanent paraplegia/paraparesis. Twenty-six patients (41%) underwent planned extension procedures, including 22 endovascular procedures within a median of 122 (interquartile range, 64-156) days. In the aortic rupture group, 2 patients were lost to follow-up at 1 year. Freedom from MAE at 1 year was 71% (5/7). One patient (14%) died, 2 patients (29%) had permanent stroke, and none had permanent paraplegia/paraparesis. No extension procedures were performed in the rupture group.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year results with the Thoraflex Hybrid device are acceptable. Long-term data are necessary to assess the durability of these repairs.

Computed Tomography Angiography After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Interventions

This comprehensive article reviews the complex realm of aortic surgical and endovascular interventions, focusing on the aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and abdominal aorta. It outlines the nuances of various procedures, emphasizing the importance of computed tomography angiography acquisition for an accurate assessment. Detailed discussions encompass expected postsurgical/endovascular findings and complications, covering various scenarios, from hematoma and infection to pseudoaneurysms and graft-related issues. This article serves as a crucial resource for radiologists, offering invaluable insights into the complexities of aortic interventions and their subsequent imaging, fostering a comprehensive understanding of diagnostic and management strategies.

The Fate of Conventional Elephant Trunk in the Frozen Elephant Trunk Era

Conventional elephant trunk (cET) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) are two distinct approaches to the surgical treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. With the advent and growing uptake of endovascular technologies, FET is becoming increasingly popular for its potential to be performed as a single-stage operation with better aortic remodeling and less risk of graft kinking than the traditional two-stage cET procedure. However, FET has been associated with a higher risk of spinal cord ischemia and its use in patients with connective tissue disorder remains controversial. The current review aimed to reflect on recent evidence surrounding the application of cET and FET to different types of aortic pathology in both acute and elective settings. Another scope of this review was to compare the characteristics of the currently available FET commercial devices on the global market. Our findings highlight that when the pathology is confined to the proximal descending aorta, such as in Dsine, intervention is often single-staged and false lumen (FL) thrombosis is achieved with good effect. FET remains limited by spinal cord injury and applicability in patients with connective tissue disorder, although some groups have started to circumvent associated complications, likely due to growing surgical expertise. Many other aortic diseases do require second-stage intervention, and even in these cases, there appears to be lower in-hospital mortality when using FET over cET. This is possibly due to the higher rate of endovascular completion facilitated by the completed landing zones created during FET. FET is trending toward becoming the universal treatment modality for extending repair to the descending aorta.

Impact of frozen elephant trunk on the outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic repair with normothermic iliac perfusion

Background

Frozen elephant trunk technique (FET) has been proven to provide an excellent landing zone for second-stage thoracoabdominal (TA) aortic repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of FET in TA aortic repair with normothermic iliac perfusion.

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2019, 144 patients undergoing TA repair with normothermic iliac perfusion were enrolled in this study. Early and mid-term outcomes of patients with previous FET implantation (group A, n = 62) were compared with patients without previous FET implantation (group B, n = 82). The logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the risk factors for adverse events, which were defined as early death, permanent stroke, permanent paraplegia, or permanent renal failure necessitating dialysis.

Results

The proximal aortic clamp time and operating time was 14.26 ± 5.57 min and 357.40 ± 94.51 respectively in group A, which were both significantly shorter than that in group B (18.67 ± 5.24 min and 18.67 ± 5.24 min). The incidence of adverse event was significantly lower in group A than that in group B (9.7% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.027). There was no significant difference between two groups with regard to other complications or late outcomes. In addition, age >50 years, a Ccr < 90 ml/min/1.73 m² and the operating time were identified as significant risk factors through logistic regression analysis for adverse events of TA repair.

Conclusions

The FET technique simplifies the operative technique of proximal anastomosis, decreases the operating time and improves the early outcomes in TA repair, whereas does not provide a significant benefit with regard to late outcomes. Long-term follow-up and studies with larger sample sizes are necessary for further confirmation.

Early and midterm results of frozen elephant trunk operation with Evita open stent-graft in patients with Marfan syndrome: results of a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) is not recommended. Hybrid procedures such as frozen elephant trunk (FET), which combines stent-graft deployment with an integrated non-stented fabric graft for proximal grafting and suturing, have not been previously evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of FET operation in patients with MFS.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the International E-vita Open Registry (IEOR) who underwent FET procedure between January 2001 and February 2020 meeting Ghent criteria for MFS were included in the study. Early and midterm results were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative, postoperative and follow-up computed tomography angiography scans were analysed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 patients [mean age 38 ± 11 years, 65% men]. Acute or chronic aortic dissection was present in 35 (95%) patients (14 and 21 patients respectively). Two (5%) patients had an aneurysm without dissection. Malperfusion syndrome was present in 4 patients. Twenty-nine (78%) patients had history of aortic surgical interventions. The 30-day and in-hospital mortality amounted to 8 and 14% respectively. False lumen exclusion was present in 73% in stented segment in last postoperative CT. The overall 5-year survival was 71% and freedom from reintervention downstream was 58% at 5 years. Of the nine patients who required reintervention for distal aortic disease, one patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

FET operation for patients with MFS can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity. In long-term follow-up no reinterventions on the aortic arch were required. FET allows for easier second stage operations providing platform for surgical and endovascular reinterventions.

Staged Repair of Extensive Aneurysms of the Thoracic Aorta by Using the Elephant Trunk Technique

BACKGROUND

Staged open repair of extensive aortic aneurysm by using the elephant trunk (ET) technique has facilitated the treatment of aortic aneurysms that affect the entire thoracic aorta. We describe our nearly 3-decade experience with classic ET repairs.

METHODS

From 1990 through 2021, we performed 363 stage-1 ET repairs to replace the transverse aortic arch in patients with a median age of 65 years [interquartile range: 56-71]. Fifty-six patients (15.4%) presented with acute symptoms, and 182 (50.1%) underwent redo sternotomy. After a median interval of 3.2 months [IQR: 2.0-7.3], 203 (55.9%) patients underwent stage-2 ET completion; few (n=16; 7.9%) had acute symptoms. Stage-2 repairs comprised 162 (80.6%) extent I or II thoracoabdominal aortic replacements. We examined postoperative outcomes including operative mortality, adverse event (a composite end point), survival, and repair failure.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 12.4% (45/363) after stage-1 and 10.3% (21/203) after stage-2. The rates of adverse event were 18.5% (67/363) for stage-1 and 18.4% (38/203) for stage-2. Acute symptoms independently predicted operative mortality and adverse event for both stage-1 and stage-2 repairs; additional predictors for stage-2 repairs were older age and extent II repair. Survival was significantly worse for patients who did not receive their stage-2 completion repair than for those who did (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treating extensive aortic aneurysms by using the ET technique for staged repair is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients who present with acute symptoms are at greater risk of operative mortality and adverse event. Diligent surveillance is needed between stages.

CT of Postoperative Repair of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch

While many of the classic open surgical repairs are still used to repair the ascending aorta, management of the aortic arch has become more complex via implementation of newer open surgical and endovascular techniques. Furthermore, techniques are often combined in novel repairs or to allow extended anatomic coverage. As such, a framework that rests on understanding the expected postoperative appearance is necessary for the diagnostic radiologist to best interpret CT studies in these patients. After reviewing the imaging appearances of the common components used in proximal aortic repair, the authors present a structured approach that focuses on the key relevant questions that diagnostic radiologists should consider when interpreting CT studies in these patients. For repair of the ascending aorta, this includes determining whether the aortic valve has been repaired, whether the sinuses of Valsalva have been repaired, and how the coronary arteries were managed, when necessary. In repairs that involve the aortic arch, the relevant considerations relate to management of the arch vessels and the distal extent of the repair. In focusing on these questions, the diagnostic radiologist will be able to identify and describe the vast majority of repairs. Understanding these questions will also facilitate improved understanding of novel repairs, which often use these basic building blocks. Finally, complications-which typically involve infection, noninfectious repair breakdown, hemorrhage, problems with endografts, or disease of the remaining adjacent aorta-will be identifiable as deviations from the expected postoperative appearance. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

A 60-year-old woman with asymptomatic total thoracic-abdominal aortic aneurysm

Introduction

Total thoracic–abdominal aortic aneurysm is a rare disease in cardiovascular surgery, with high surgical risk and high mortality. Surgery is considered the most effective treatment for total aortic aneurysms.

Case presentation

Our group admitted a 60-year-old female patients with asymptomatic complex total thoracic–abdominal aortic aneurysm, and successfully performed two-staged surgery, namely Bentall + Sun’s operation in the first-stage and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement in the second-stage. The results of the surgery were satisfactory.

Conclusions

Patients with total thoracic–abdominal aortic aneurysm may not have typical clinical symptoms and require a careful and comprehensive physical examination and related auxiliary examinations by clinicians. Staged repair of total thoracic–abdominal aortic aneurysms is still a safe and effective treatment.

Graft endoclamping with brachio-femoral wire conduit for elephant trunk retrieval in open thoraco-abdominal aortic repair

Staged repair involving aortic arch replacement with elephant trunk (ET) technique and thoraco-abdominal aorta (TAA) replacement is the treatment of choice for patients with extensive aortic disease. The ET graft serves as a proximal platform for subsequent distal aortic repair as it allows one to avoid hazardous dissection of the distal arch and facilitate proximal anastomosis. However, in patients with large proximal descending aorta aneurysm, identifying and retrieving the ET during the second-stage TAA intervention can be challenging because of an unclampable aorta. Here, we present our brachio-femoral wire conduit technique for a safe ET clamping and retrieval during second-stage TAA procedures.

Post-operative computed tomography imaging evaluation of ascending aorta surgery

Ascending thoracic aorta disease is often a life-threatening condition. Aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection are the most frequent ascending aorta diseases requiring surgical intervention. Surgical repair techniques of the ascending aorta are various; they include reconstruction of the ascending aorta by using a graft with or without a prosthetic valve, reconstruction with a composite artificial graft or using a biological graft, and reconstruction of the ascending aorta with a composite graft preserving the native valve and arch repair. The radiologist plays a key role in the identification of post-operative complications; differentiation from normal postoperative findings is fundamental. Our aim is to discuss the main diseases affecting the ascending aorta requiring surgery and the different techniques used to treat them. We also discuss the normal computed tomography (CT) imaging findings and after-surgery complications.

Interstage mortality in two-stage elephant trunk surgery

PURPOSE

Diffuse mega-aorta is challenging. Prior studies have raised concerns regarding the safety of the open two-stage elephant trunk (ET) approach for extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), specifically in regard to interstage mortality. This study evaluates the safety of the two-stage ET approach for management of extensive TAA.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2018, 152 patients underwent a Stage I ET procedure by a single surgeon (mean age 64.5 ± 14.8). Second stage ET procedure was planned in 60 patients (39.4%) and to-date has been performed in 54 patients (90%). (in the remaining patients, the ET was prophylactic for the long-term, with no plan for near-term utilization).

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality after the Stage I procedure was 3.3% (5/152). In patients planned for Stage II, the median interstage interval was 5 weeks (range: 0-14). Of the remaining six patients with planned, but uncompleted Stage II procedures, five patients expired from various causes in the interval period (interstage mortality of 8.3%). There were no cases of aortic rupture in the interstage interval. Stage II was completed in 58 patients (including four unplanned) with a 30-day mortality of 10.3% (6/58). Seven patients developed strokes after Stage II (12%), and three patients (5.1%) developed paraplegia.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall mortality, including Stage I, interstage interval, and Stage II was 18.6%. This substantial cumulative mortality for the open two-staged ET approach for the treatment of extensive TAA appears commensurate with the severity of the widespread aortic disease in this patient group. Fear of interstage rupture should not preclude the aggressive Two-Stage approach to the management of extensive TAA.

Surgical strategies in the management of chronic dissection of the thoracoabdominal aorta

Most operations for dissection of the thoracoabdominal aorta take place in the chronic phase of the disease, because the acutely dissected distal aorta is almost always initially treated non-surgically with aggressive pharmacological anti-impulse therapy. Identifying patients who are no longer responding to medical treatment is the first step in preventing further disease progression and rupture. Symptomatic aneurysms should be promptly repaired. Asymptomatic patients are followed until significant aortic dilation occurs and reaches a threshold of intervention: current guidelines endorse repair once a diameter of 5.5 cm is reached. In patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease (such as Marfan Syndrome), the threshold of intervention is often lowered. Aortic replacement typically centers on the dilatated segment. For all extents of repair, we use passive mild hypothermia, sequential aortic cross-clamping, aggressive reimplantation of intercostal and lumbar arteries, and cold renal perfusion whenever possible. For Crawford extents I and II thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, we routinely use cerebrospinal fluid drainage, left heart bypass, and selective visceral perfusion. A four-branched graft approach to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair is frequently used in patients with chronic aortic dissection; this approach facilitates visceral artery perfusion during repair, expedites the distal anastomosis, and prevents subsequent visceral patch aneurysms. Lifelong imaging surveillance is necessary, because the distal aorta often continues to expand; residual aortic dissection commonly remains after repair and may necessitate further repair.

Staged total arch replacement, followed by fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, for patients with mega aortic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to review the clinical outcomes of a staged approach using total arch replacement (TAR) with an elephant trunk or a frozen elephant trunk, followed by fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) for patients with mega aortic syndrome.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of 11 consecutive patients (8 men; mean age, 71 ± 7 years) treated by staged TAR and F-BEVAR from January 2014 to December 2018. The F-BEVAR procedures were performed under a prospective, nonrandomized, physician-sponsored investigational device exemption protocol. All patients had had mega aortic syndrome, defined by an ascending aorta, arch, and extent I-II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The endpoints were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE), patient survival, freedom from reintervention, and freedom from target vessel instability.

RESULTS

Of the 11 patients, 6 had developed chronic postdissection aneurysms after previous Stanford A (three A₁₁, two A₁₀, one A₉) dissection repair and 5 had had degenerative aneurysms with no suitable landing zone in the aortic arch. The thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were classified as extent I in four patients and extent II in seven. One patient had died within 30 days after TAR (9.0%). However, none of the remaining 10 patients who had undergone F-BEVAR had died. First-stage TAR resulted in MAE in three patients (27%), including one spinal cord injury. The mean length of stay was 12 ± 6 days. The mean interval between TAR and F-BEVAR was 245 ± 138 days with no aneurysm rupture during the interval. Second-stage F-BEVAR was associated with MAE in two patients (20%), including spinal cord injury in one patient from spinal hematoma due to placement of a cerebrospinal fluid drain. The mean follow-up period was 14 ± 10 months. At 2 years postoperatively, patient survival, primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from renal-mesenteric target vessel instability was 80% ± 9%, 94% ± 6%, 100%, and 86% ± 8%, respectively. No aortic-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Four patients had required reintervention, all performed using an endovascular approach.

CONCLUSIONS

A staged approach to treatment of mega aortic syndrome using TAR and F-BEVAR is a feasible alternative for selected high-risk patients. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed.

Staged repair of chronic type A aortic dissection with small true lumen at the descending aorta

Background

Surgical strategy for treating chronic type A dissection with small true lumen at the descending aorta has not been reported. In this retrospective study, we reviewed our experience of applying a two-stage procedure for treating chronic type A dissection with small true lumen at the descending aorta.

Methods

Between February 2016 and December 2019, seven patients suffering from chronic type A dissection with small true lumen at the descending aorta underwent this procedure. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was performed to carefully assess the diameter of the descending aorta, tear site, and visceral arteries. The interval between the two procedures is determined by the condition of the patients’ recovery and illustration of postoperative CTA after the first stage procedure.

Results

All patients underwent first- and second-stage procedures. No mortality was observed among the seven patients. One patient who had a transient neurological deficit after the first stage recovered completely before hospital discharge. In two patients, the diameter of the descending aorta was enlarged postoperatively after the first-stage procedure. The interval between the two procedures was 2–3 months. However, no adverse events, such as stroke, paraparesis, visceral malperfusion, and lower extremity malfunction, were observed.

Conclusions

The two-staged procedure for the repair of chronic type A dissection with small true lumen at the descending aorta is adaptable with low prevalence of mortality and complication.

Which is the Optimal Frozen Elephant Trunk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in 2161 Patients Undergoing Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery Using E-vita OPEN PLUS Hybrid Stent Graft versus Thoraflex™ Hybrid Prosthesis

Objective

To systematically review the rate of morbidity and mortality associated with the use of E-vita hybrid stent graft and ThoraflexTM in patients undergoing complex aortic surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases to identify published data about E-vita or Thoraflex™ in patients undergoing repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

Results

In total, 28 papers were included in the study, encompassing a total of 2,161 patients (1,919 E-vita and 242 Thoraflex™). Patients undergoing surgery with E-vita or Thoraflex™ were of similar age and sex. The number of patients undergoing non-elective repair with Thoraflex™ was higher than with E-vita (35.2% vs. 28.7%, respectively). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was associated with increasing mortality in E-vita patients, however a meta-analysis of proportions showed higher 30-day mortality, permanent neurological deficit, and one-year mortality for Thoraflex™ patients. Direct statistical comparisons between E-vita and Thoraflex™ was not possible due to heterogeneity of studies.

Conclusion

Although there are limited studies available, the available data suggests that mortality and morbidity are lower for the E-vita device in thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery than for Thoraflex™. Long-term data of comparative studies do not yet exist to assess viability of these procedures.

Hybrid repair of extensive thoracic aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

This was a multicentre, observational study. Data were collected prospectively between January 2002 and March 2019 and analysed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria for the final analysis were the treatment of elective or urgent ETAA performed in a single-stage or a planned two-stage approach. Early and late survival rates were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Indications for repair were degenerative ETAA in 27 (64.3%) patients and dissection-related ETAA in 15 (35.7%). The mean aortic diameter was 68 ± 16 mm (interquartile range 60–75). Five (11.9%) patients had a single-stage repair; and 37 underwent a two-stage approach. Three (7.1%) patients died in-hospital. The median follow-up was 49 months (range 0–204). During the follow-up period, 4 (9.5%) patients underwent aortic reintervention after a median of 32 months; however, no aortic rupture of the treated segment occurred. Overall, the estimated survival rate was 85% ± 6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 70.8–93] at 12 and 36 months and 69.5% ± 9% (95% CI 49.7–84) at 60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid repair of ETAA had satisfactory early results in this cohort of patients. At the midterm follow-up, the aneurysm-related mortality rate was acceptable with the reconstruction proving to be durable and safe with few distal aortic events.

The frozen elephant trunk technique in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

Although advances in the field of cardiovascular surgery have improved outcomes for patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection, postoperative in-hospital mortality and morbidity remain substantial. The frozen elephant trunk technique has become a treatment option for this disease and was developed primarily to extend repair into the proximal descending thoracic aorta during aortic arch repair (because the descending thoracic aorta is largely inaccessible via median sternotomy), thus avoiding, delaying, or facilitating subsequent repair of residual native aorta. In this review, we discuss the evidence for and future development of frozen elephant trunk reconstruction for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

Physician-Modified Thoracic Stent Grafts for the Arch After Surgical Treatment of Type A Dissection

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the outcome of physician-modified thoracic stent grafts for the treatment of dissecting aortic arch aneurysms after surgical treatment of acute type A dissection.

METHODS

From August 2016 through February 2018, 13 patients (8 men and 5 women) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair in which physician-modified thoracic stent grafts were used to treat dissecting aortic arch aneurysms after surgical treatment of acute type A dissection. Patients were a mean age of 70.7 ± 10 years (range, 43 to 82 years). Four patients were treated in an emergent setting for a symptomatic aortic arch aneurysm. The aneurysmal disease involved zone 0 in 10 patients and zone 2 in 3. Seven patients (48%) were treated using an aortic arch stent graft with a single fenestration, combined with cervical debranching in 4 patients. Six patients underwent total endovascular aortic arch repair using a double-fenestrated stent graft. Additional planned endovascular procedures were performed in 3 patients.

RESULTS

Median time for stent graft modifications was 18 minutes (range, 14 to 21 minutes). All the proximal entry tears in the arch were successfully excluded. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. One patient (7.6%) had a stroke without permanent sequelae. The median length of stay was 5 days (range, 1 to 17 days). During follow up of 8 ± 6 months, there were no conversions to open repair, aortic rupture, paraplegia, or retrograde dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of physician-modified thoracic stent grafts for the treatment of dissecting aortic arch aneurysm after surgical treatment of acute type A dissection is feasible and effective. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in future studies.

Neurologic Outcomes in Aortic Arch Repair With Frozen Elephant Trunk Versus 2-Stage Hybrid Repair

BACKGROUND

We compared outcomes of single-stage hybrid aortic arch replacement (frozen elephant trunk) versus 2-stage hybrid repairs with primary open arch procedures followed by thoracic endovascular stenting.

METHODS

This study reports a single-center retrospective review (2003 to 2016) of 118 patients undergoing hybrid repair of the aortic arch including 48 single-stage repairs versus 70 two-stage repairs.

RESULTS

Single-stage repair was performed in 48 patients, including 31 (64.6%) men and 17 (35.4%) women with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years and a 2-stage procedure was performed in 70 patients, including 42 (60%) men and 28 (40%) women with a mean age of 65.67 ± 13.3 years (p = 0.46). More emergent single-stage procedures were performed in 23 of 48 (47.9%) patients versus 2-stage procedures in 8 of 70 (11.43%) patients (p < 0.001). Between the single- and 2-stage groups, there was no difference in stroke (6.25% [3 of 48] versus 14.28% [10 of 70]; p = 0.23), spinal cord ischemia (4.16% [2 of 48] versus 5.7% [4 of 70]; p = 1.0), or 30-day mortality rate: 8 of 48 (16.7%) patients versus a combined 30-day mortality rate of the 2-stage procedure of 14.8% (4 of 70 [5.7%] at the first stage and 5 of 55 [9.1%] at the second stage; p = 0.56), respectively. After exclusion of the 30-day mortality, midterm survival was 86% at 1 to 2 years for single-stage patients versus 80% at 1 year and 46% at 2 years for the 2-stage patients (p = 0.0019).

CONCLUSIONS

Both single-stage and 2-stage hybrid arch replacements are effective approaches for treating complex aortic arch diseases. Early deaths and neurological outcomes in the single-stage group are comparable to those in the combined 2-stage group. Furthermore, in this series, patients who had a single-stage hybrid procedure had a higher survival rate at 2 years.

Postcardiovascular Surgery Findings of the Thoracic Aorta

Various disease processes may affect the ascending thoracic aorta, aortic arch, and/or descending thoracic aorta, including aneurysms, dissections, intramural hematomas, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers, and aortic transection/rupture. Many of those conditions require surgical intervention for repair. Multiple open and endovascular techniques are used for treatment of thoracic aortic pathology. It is imperative that the cardiothoracic radiologist have a thorough knowledge of the surgical techniques available, the expected postoperative imaging findings, and the complications that may occur to accurately diagnose life-threatening pathology when present, and avoid common pitfalls of misinterpreting normal postoperative findings as pathologic conditions.

Total aortic arch replacement using elephant trunk or frozen elephant trunk technique: a case-control matching study

Background

Surgical management of aortic arch diseases is one of the most challenging issues in cardiovascular surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome after frozen elephant trunk (FET) with conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique.

Methods

Out of a total of 551 patients after thoracic aortic surgery, we analyzed 70 consecutive patients, who underwent aortic arch replacement with ET or FET technique between 2001 and 2017 in our institution. The patients were case-control matched in regard to such variables as age, sex, presence of an acute aortic dissection and necessity for concomitant procedures. The analysis included 25 patient pairs.

Results

Among the 25 FET patients, eleven patients were female, the median age was 69, 15 (60%) patients had an aortic dissection and thirteen needed various concomitant procedures. In the second group, treated with conventional ET technique, 10 (40%) patients were female, the median age was 66 years, thirteen presented with an aortic dissection and 16 (64%) underwent concomitant procedures. These and other characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. In-hospital mortality was statistically similar: 5 (20%) in the FET group vs. 8 (32%) for ET group (P=0.52). The incidence of stroke, acute renal failure and postoperative bleeding was comparable. The length of stay in the intensive care unit did not differ between the cohorts (P=0.258). Predictors of in-hospital mortality were length of the operation, bleeding postoperatively, and acute renal failure. The one-year survival rates were higher in the FET cohort compared to the conventional approach (60% vs. 38%), however without statistical significance.

Conclusion

In regard to the short- and mid-term outcome, there were only slight differences between both techniques. In patients with extensive aneurysmal aortic disease, conventional ET and FET procedures seem to be associated with acceptable satisfactory mid-term outcome.

Midterm Results of 2-Stage Hybrid Arch Repair for Extensive Aortic Arch Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

This report evaluated the perioperative and midterm results of the 2-stage hybrid arch procedure. This procedure involves total arch replacement with an elephant trunk as the first stage and thoracic endovascular aortic repair as the second stage for patients with extended aortic arch pathology.

METHODS

Between April 2010 and April 2017, 55 consecutive patients (age, 74.2 ± 6.4 years) with extended aortic arch atherosclerotic pathology involving the aortic arch and descending aorta underwent first-stage total arch replacement with the elephant trunk procedure. The second stage was completed for 53 (96.4%) of the 55 patients. The mean duration between the 2 procedures was 2.4 ± 2.2 months. Postoperative follow-up was completed after a mean of 36.6 ± 24.9 months.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate for the first stage was 0%. Two patients died during the interval between surgeries. The in-hospital mortality rate for the second stage was 0%. Two (3.6%) of the 55 first-stage patients and none of the 53 second-stage patients experienced a postoperative stroke. No spinal cord dysfunction occurred during the first-stage and second-stage procedures. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 88.2% and 67.0%, respectively. The 5-year thoracic aortic intervention-free rate was 95.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended aortic arch aneurysms were repaired using a 2-stage hybrid arch repair. Perioperative mortality and midterm results were acceptable. Use of an elephant trunk provided a secure landing zone for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. This 2-stage hybrid procedure is an alternative approach to extended aortic arch pathology.

Frozen elephant trunk and arch endografts for chronic thoracoabdominal aortic dissections

Chronic aortic dissecting aneurysms (TAAD) presenting after acute Stanford type A or B dissection includes both arch and/or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Approximately 60% of patients who survive surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissections will require another aortic procedure. Similarly, more than 70% of patients with chronic type B aortic dissections will experience false lumen dilation at 5-year follow-up, often requiring intervention. Open or hybrid aortic repairs of complex TAAD involving the arch and the TAAA are very demanding procedures for both patients and clinicians. Open surgery remains the first line therapy in fit patients. Recent development of branched arch devices has offered an alternative option for high-risk patients. Technical challenges associated with the endovascular management of these complex aneurysms include proximal sealing zone often located in the aortic arch or the ascending aorta, narrow true lumen working space, and aortic branch perfusion by either the true or false lumen, or both. Recent studies have reported encouraging results with endovascular treatment of these complex dissecting aneurysms, especially following open ascending aortic repair. The aim of this review was to describe the available strategies for arch repair in the setting of a chronic TAAD and to determine the subset of patients that can benefit from of a totally endovascular approach.

Aortic Arch Replacement in Patients With Chronic Dissection: Special Considerations

The progressive expansion of residual, chronic DeBakey type I dissection often necessitates repair of the aortic arch and the distal aorta (ie, descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta). The vast majority of patients with chronic aortic dissection facing aortic arch surgery are survivors of emergent proximal aortic repair for acute dissection, and thus, these patients now face a reoperative procedure necessitating a redo median sternotomy. One approach for repairing the chronic type I aortic dissection incorporates total transverse aortic arch replacement with and without an elephant trunk extension; an elephant trunk extension is a useful strategy, because the proximal descending thoracic aorta is commonly ectatic or aneurysmal at the time of aortic arch repair-using an elephant trunk approach facilitates subsequent repair in the distal aorta. Patients with chronic DeBakey type I dissection should participate in an imaging surveillance protocol.

Long-term results of simplified frozen elephant trunk technique in complicated acute type A aortic dissection: A case–control study

Aim

To describe the long-term experience of a simplified frozen elephant trunk technique (sFETT) used in complicated acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) treatment.

Methods and results

Between January 2001 and December 2012, 34 patients (mean age 59.9 ± 11.0 years) with complicated AAAD (DeBakey I) underwent an emergency surgery including sFETT. sFETT consisted in gluing the dissected aortic arch wall layers with gelatine-resorcinol adhesive and video-assisted antegrade open arch aortic stent-graft deployment in the arch or proximal descending aorta. In addition to sFETT, the aortic root was addressed with standard techniques. A 30-day mortality was 14.7% (five patients) due to bleeding (1), multiple organ failure (2), and colon ischemia (2). Postoperative morbidity included neurological (2), renal (1) and cardio-pulmonary complications (4), as well as wound infection (1). Mean follow-up was 74.4 ± 45.0 months. Actual survival rates were 73.5% at 1 year, 70.2% at 5 years, and 58.5% at 13 years of follow-up. Six patients died during long-term follow-up from heart failure (1) and unknown reasons (5). Five patients required reoperation for aortic arch (3) or aorto-iliac (2) progression of aneurysm during the mid- and long-term follow-up. The remaining patients showed favorable evolution of the dissected aorta with false lumen occlusion in most cases and stable aortic diameters.

Conclusions

In AAAD patients, sFETT as used in our series is an easy and safe technique to repair the aortic arch. Long-term results after sFETT showed false lumen occlusion and stable aortic diameter in up to 13 years of follow-up.

A Simple Technique to Facilitate Antegrade Thoracic Endograft Deployment Using a Hybrid Elephant Trunk Procedure under Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest

Purpose:

To describe a technique to facilitate antegrade thoracic endograft deployment using a hybrid elephant trunk operation under hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Technique:

When using a nitinol-based endograft in a hybrid endovascular aortic arch repair performed in a hypothermic patient, the endograft does not expand fully when the body temperature is typically maintained below 20°C. Immersing the nitinol-based thoracic endograft in a sterile hot saline bath (48°C) for 1 to 2 minutes prior to deployment warms the stent-graft to a physiological temperature of 38°C, which it maintains for several minutes while being deployed.

Conclusion:

Although the described technique represents an off-label approach to the use of a TAG device, we believe warming a nitinol-based endograft may potentially improve the technical success of this hybrid operation when the patient is under hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Endovascular Closure of Chronic Dissection Entries in the Aortic Arch Using the Amplatzer Vascular Plug II as a Sealing Button

Purpose: To present a new endovascular technique to avoid open surgical arch reconstruction in selected patients with aneurysmal dilatation due to small chronic dissection entries in the aortic arch. Technique: The true and the false lumen of the aortic arch are catheterized from the femoral arteries. An Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (AVP II) is advanced through the proximal entry from the false lumen side and deployed as a sealing button in the entry hole, with 1 disc in the true lumen and the remaining 2 discs in the false lumen. This technique was used in 4 patients with chronic dissection involving the aortic arch, three of whom had had previous surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. In 3 patients, the false lumen of the thoracic aorta was successfully obliterated, with thrombosis and aortic diameter reduction during follow-up. In 1 patient, false lumen flow persisted, and he was subsequently treated with a total arch reconstruction and frozen elephant trunk. Conclusion: Endovascular closure of small proximal dissection entries in the aortic arch with an AVP II used as a sealing button is feasible and may be an alternative to open surgical arch reconstruction in selected patients with chronic aortic dissection and secondary aneurysm expansion.

A Meta-Analysis of Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Objectives:

To assess the safety and efficacy, we performed a meta-analysis of total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk in exclusive acute type A (neither chronic nor type B) aortic dissection.

Methods:

Databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through March 2015 using Web-based search engines (PubMed and OVID). Eligible studies were case series of frozen elephant trunk enrolling patients with acute type A (neither chronic nor type B) aortic dissection reporting at least early (in-hospital or 30-day) all-cause mortality. Study-specific estimates were combined in both fixed- and random-effect models.

Results:

Fifteen studies enrolling 1279 patients were identified and included. Pooled analyses demonstrated the cardiopulmonary bypass time of 207.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 186.1-228.1) minutes, aortic cross-clamp time of 123.3 (95% CI, 113.1-133.5) minutes, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time of 49.3 (95% CI, 37.6-61.0) minutes, hypothermic circulatory arrest time of 39.0 (95% CI, 30.7-47.2) minutes, early mortality of 9.2% (95% CI, 7.7-11.0%), stroke of 4.8% (95% CI, 2.5-9.0%), spinal cord injury of 3.5% (95% CI, 1.9-6.6%), mid- to long-term (≥1-year) overall mortality of 13.0% (95% CI, 10.4-16.0%), reintervention of 9.6% (95% CI, 5.6-15.8%), and false lumen thrombosis of 96.8% (95% CI, 90.7-98.9%).

Conclusions:

Total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk provides a safe alternative to that with conventional elephant trunk in patients with acute type A aortic dissection, with acceptable early mortality and morbidity. The rates of mid- to long-term reintervention and false lumen non-thrombosis may be lower in patients undergoing the frozen than conventional elephant trunk procedure.

Stented elephant trunk procedure with left subclavian artery transposition for acute type B dissection with distal arch involvement

OBJECTIVE

Complete or partial supra-aortic debranching, after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, is appealing treatment for complicated acute type B dissection (ABAD) with aortic arch involvement (AAI) because of reduced surgical trauma. However, unsatisfactory outcomes have been reported. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of left subclavian artery (LSCA) transposition with stented elephant trunk (SET) implantation for complicated ABAD with distal AAI.

METHODS

From April 2011 to December 2014, 19 patients (all men; mean age: 44 years) who had complicated ABAD and distal AAI underwent LSCA transposition with SET implantation via a median sternotomy under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with selective cerebral perfusion. Preoperative renal dysfunction was observed in 3 patients, visceral ischemia in 2 patients, and lower-limb ischemia in 1 patient.

RESULTS

No in-hospital deaths occurred. Seventeen patients required mechanical ventilation for <24 hours, and 2 cases for <48 hours. The mean time of mechanical ventilation and duration of stay in the intensive care unit was 18 ± 6 hours and 44 ± 16 hours, respectively. Ischemia of the viscera and lower limbs after surgery was ameliorated. Continuous renal replacement therapy was not required in 3 patients who had preoperative renal dysfunction. Complete thrombosis of the false lumen at the distal end of the SET was observed in 17 of 18 (94.4%) patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This method preserves autologous brachiocephalic vessels, excludes the false lumen, promotes thrombosis and remodeling of the distal aorta, and repairs proximal aortic lesions simultaneously. Satisfactory surgical outcomes and follow-up results were achieved using LSCA transposition with SET implantation.