Recognition and Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass Patients

Organ damage evaluation in a temperature-controlled circulatory arrest rat model

BACKGROUND

Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is commonly used in adult aortic surgery and pediatric complex congenital heart disease, and is associated with pathophysiological changes and postoperative complications. Here, a temperature-controlled circulatory arrest model in rats was established to study the suitable temperature of circulatory arrest by investigating the damage to body organs under different temperatures.

METHODS

Thirty Sprague‒Dawley rats were randomly divided into 5 equal groups for DHCA experiments: I (15-20 °C), II (20-25 °C), III (25-30 °C), IV (normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass), and V (sham operation group). Blood gas analysis, homodynamic parameters, and intervals of cardiac recovery were measured at different time points in all groups. Morphological changes in intestinal tissue were observed under light and electron microscopes. Oxidative stress was measured by MPO activity, MDA, and SOD content. Tissue damage was confirmed by serum detection of ALT, AST, BUN, Cr, and LDH. To examine the inflammatory response, cytokines, including IL-1, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, were detected.

RESULTS

The extracorporeal circulation technique caused damage to the body; the degree of the damage caused by the circulatory arrest technique may be related to circulating temperature, with the least amount of damage occurring at 20-25 °C compared to 15-20 °C and 25-30 °C. Ischemia and hypoxia can cause intestinal tissue damage, which manifests primarily as a loss of the intestinal mucosal barrier. Ischemic intestinal damage caused by DHCA was not associated with inflammation.

CONCLUSION

The study provides new insights into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of DHCA.

Current Clinical Trials on the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Pediatric Population

Common treatment options for deep vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism in the pediatric population include unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and warfarin. Other alternatives are bivalirudin, argatroban, and fondaparinux. Warfarin is the only approved oral option, but an oral agent without frequent monitoring would be optimal for pediatric patients. Thus, there is an increasing need for new anticoagulation options in this population. None of the current direct oral anticoagulants have FDA-approved indications and dosing in children. The two classes of DOACs and the drugs they are comprised of are factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). Off-label usage of these agents is largely based on adult doses. By far, rivaroxaban and dabigatran have the most published data and ongoing trials in pediatric patients compared to edoxaban and apixaban. After evaluating the current literature available on these agents, it is, however, still too early to make any definitive recommendations on their usage in this special population.

Challenging Argatroban Management of a Child on Extracorporeal Support and Subsequent Heart Transplant

A 6-year-old child developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia while on extracorporeal life support. Hours after a difficult transition from heparin to argatroban for anticoagulation therapy, the child underwent heart transplantation. Intraoperative management was plagued with circuit thrombus formation while on cardiopulmonary bypass and subsequent massive hemorrhage after bypass. We review the child’s anticoagulation management, clinical challenges encountered, and review current literature related to the use of argatroban in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulants in paediatric patients

Given the rising incidence of thrombotic complications in paediatric patients, understanding of the pharmacologic behaviour of anticoagulant drugs in children has gained importance. Significant developmental differences between children and adults in the haemostatic system and pharmacologic parameters for individual drugs highlight potentially unique aspects of anticoagulant pharmacology in this special and vulnerable population. This review focuses on pharmacologic information relevant to the dosing of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, warfarin, bivalirudin, argatroban and fondaparinux in paediatric patients. The bulk of clinical experience with paediatric anticoagulation rests with the first three of these agents, each of which requires higher bodyweight-based dosing for the youngest patients, compared with adults, in order to achieve comparable pharmacodynamic effects, likely related to an inverse correlation between age and bodyweight-normalized clearance of these drugs. Whether extrapolation of therapeutic ranges targeted for adult patients prescribed these agents is valid for children, however, is unknown and a high priority for future research. Novel oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, hold promise for future use in paediatrics but require further pharmacologic study in infants, children and adolescents.

High-dose argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a child using a ventricular assist device

A 10-year-old boy who was receiving support from a ventricular assist device (VAD) experienced heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that was successfully treated with high-dose argatroban infusion to attain therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time in spite of high serum argatroban levels. This case also highlights bolus argatroban dosing for VAD change in the setting of persistent ventricular fibrillation.

The pediatric cardiology pharmacopeia: 2013 update

The use of medications plays a pivotal role in the management of children with heart diseases. Most children with increased pulmonary blood flow require chronic use of anticongestive heart failure medications until more definitive interventional or surgical procedures are performed. The use of such medications, particularly inotropic agents and diuretics, is even more amplified during the postoperative period. Currently, children are undergoing surgical intervention at an ever younger age with excellent results aided by advanced anesthetic and postoperative care. The most significant of these advanced measures includes invasive and noninvasive monitoring as well as a wide array of pharmacologic agents. This review update provides a medication guide for medical practitioners involved in care of children with heart diseases.

Bleeding and Thrombotic Emergencies in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care

Children in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) with congenital or acquired heart disease are at risk for hematologic complications, both hemorrhage and thrombosis. The overall incidence of hematologic complications in the CICU is unknown, but risk factors and target groups have been identified where the essential physiologic balance between bleeding and clotting has been disrupted. Although the best management of life-threatening bleeding and clotting is prevention, the cardiac intensivist is often faced with managing life-threatening hematologic events involving patients from within the unit or those who present from outside. Part I of this review deals with the propensity of children with congenital and acquired heart disease to complications of both bleeding and clotting, and includes discussions of perioperative bleeding, thromboses in single-ventricle patients, clotting of Blalock-Taussig shunts and thrombotic complications of mechanical valves. Part II deals with the subject of stroke in children with heart disease. Part III reviews monitoring the effectiveness of anticoagulation and thrombolysis in the CICU. Currently available diagnostics modalities, medications and management strategies are reviewed and future directions discussed.

Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Neonates and children differ from adults in physiology, pharmacologic responses to drugs, epidemiology, and long-term consequences of thrombosis. This guideline addresses optimal strategies for the management of thrombosis in neonates and children.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow those described in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

RESULTS

We suggest that where possible, pediatric hematologists with experience in thromboembolism manage pediatric patients with thromboembolism (Grade 2C). When this is not possible, we suggest a combination of a neonatologist/pediatrician and adult hematologist supported by consultation with an experienced pediatric hematologist (Grade 2C). We suggest that therapeutic unfractionated heparin in children is titrated to achieve a target anti-Xa range of 0.35 to 0.7 units/mL or an activated partial thromboplastin time range that correlates to this anti-Xa range or to a protamine titration range of 0.2 to 0.4 units/mL (Grade 2C). For neonates and children receiving either daily or bid therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin, we suggest that the drug be monitored to a target range of 0.5 to 1.0 units/mL in a sample taken 4 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection or, alternatively, 0.5 to 0.8 units/mL in a sample taken 2 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence supporting most recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children remains weak. Studies addressing appropriate drug target ranges and monitoring requirements are urgently required in addition to site- and clinical situation-specific thrombosis management strategies.

Old and new antithrombotic drugs in neonates and infants

Thromboembolic complications are becoming more frequent in children and the use of anticoagulation has increased considerably. The most widely used agents in children, heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and warfarin all have limitations which are exaggerated in children. This has led to the study of newer agents with improved pharmacologic properties such as bivalirudin, argatroban, and fondaparinux. Clinical trials are under way to assess several new oral anticoagulants that are in late phase studies or already licensed in adults. Based on the completed studies in children, several recommendations for the use of currently available agents (bivalirudin, argatroban, and fondaparinux) are suggested for clinical use today. Additional studies need to be conducted for the these agents, so that their use may be expanded in selected indications. New regulatory requirements are leading to a number of studies in the newer anticoagulants that are yet to be licensed in adults for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Pediatric thrombosis is entering a fruitful era of research in anticoagulation management, which is sure to lead to significant changes in how children are treated in the next 10 years.

Argatroban therapy in pediatric patients requiring nonheparin anticoagulation: an open-label, safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of pediatric patients suffer from thrombotic events necessitating anticoagulation therapy including heparins. Some such patients develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thus require alternative anticoagulation. As such, studies evaluating the safety, efficacy, and dosing of alternative anticoagulants are required.

PROCEDURE

In this multicenter, single arm, open-label study, 18 patients ≤ 16 years old received argatroban for either a suspicion of or being at risk for HIT, or other conditions requiring nonheparin anticoagulation. Endpoints included thrombosis, thromboembolic complications, and bleeding.

RESULTS

Patients (ages, 1.6 weeks to 16 years) received argatroban usually for continuous anticoagulation (n = 13) or cardiac catheterization (n = 4). One catheterization patient received a 250 µg/kg bolus only; 17 patients received argatroban continuous infusion (median (range)) 1.1 (0.3-12) µg/kg/min (of whom four received a bolus) for 3.0 (0.1-13.8) days. In patients without bolus dosing, typically argatroban 1 µg/kg/min was initiated, with therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) (1.5-3× baseline) achieved within 7 hr. Within 30 days, thrombosis occurred in five patients (two during therapy). No one required amputation or died due to thrombosis during therapy. Two patients had major bleeding. Pharmacometric analyses demonstrated the optimal initial argatroban dose to be 0.75 µg/kg/min (if normal hepatic function), with dose reduction necessary in hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients requiring nonheparin anticoagulation, argatroban rapidly provides adequate levels of anticoagulation and is generally well tolerated. For continuous anticoagulation, argatroban 0.75 µg/kg/min (0.2 µg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve therapeutic aPTTs, is recommended.

Antithrombin-heparin covalent complex reduces microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass in a pig model

Transcranial Doppler-detected high-intensity transient signals (HITS) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery have been associated with postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction, suggesting microemboli in the brain could be a contributing factor. HITS occur despite administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH). This study was done to determine whether antithrombin-heparin covalent complex (ATH), a more potent anticoagulant than heparin, can reduce HITS during CPB. In a pig CPB model, ATH, UFH, or UFH + antithrombin (AT) was intravenously administered to female Yorkshire pigs after sternotomy. Twenty minutes later, hypothermic CPB was initiated and continued for 1.25 hours, then normothermia was re-established for 45 minutes. Protamine sulfate was given to neutralize the anticoagulants, and pigs were allowed to recover. HITS were monitored using an arterial flow probe placed over the carotid artery. Compared with UFH (300 or 1000 U/kg), ATH reduced the number of HITS during CPB in a dose-dependent manner. AT (3 mg/kg) + UFH (300 U/kg) resulted in an intermediate HITS rate between UFH and ATH (2 mg/kg in terms of AT). Examination of brain sections for emboli formation confirmed that, similar to HITS, number of thrombi decreased in direct proportion to ATH dosage. These results support the hypotheses that the majority of HITS represent thromboemboli and that ATH reduces emboli formation during CPB.

Hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass as a determinant of late thrombocytopenia following cardiac operations in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia after cardiac operations is a common event in both adult and pediatric patients. Late thrombocytopenia (LTCP) is a less common event that is still without a well-recognized cause. This study explores the role of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and other factors (complexity of the operation, temperature management, and drug use) in determining LTCP.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of 63 consecutive patients aged <36 months operated with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). LTCP was defined as a platelet count <100,000 cells/microl or <50% of the pre-operative count at any point in time between post-operative days 5 and 10. A diagnostic test for heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies was performed in patients with LTCP. Other pre- and post-operative factors were investigated for their association with LTCP.

RESULTS

LTCP occurred in 15 (24%) patients. No patient had positive heparin-PF4 antibodies. The lowest temperature on CPB was an independent predictor of LTCP, with a cut-off value at 29 degrees C (sensitivity 80%, specificity 70%). Other factors associated with LTCP were prolonged post-operative use of unfractionated heparin and milrinone. LTCP was associated with increased post-operative morbidity.

CONCLUSION

LTCP was related to a combination of factors (operation severity, degree of hypothermia during CPB, prolonged use of unfractionated heparin, and milrinone). The individual contribution of each factor seems difficult to establish. However, the degree of hypothermia during CPB and drug-associated effects were identified. HIT could be excluded in all cases.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Treatment Options and Special Considerations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid- and delayed-onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors--argatroban and lepirudin--are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.