Impact of maze and concomitant mitral valve surgery on clinical outcomes

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Effects of Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients Aged > 75 Years Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery

BACKGROUND

Few data exist about the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) maze procedures in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing surgery for mitral valve disease. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the effects of AF ablation associated with mitral valve surgery on the recovery and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in elderly patients aged > 75 years. Moreover, we evaluated the effects on survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 96 consecutive patients with AF (42 men and 56 women) aged > 75 years (mean age 78 ± 3) who underwent RF ablation associated with mitral valve surgery (group I). This group was compared to 209 younger patients (mean age 65 ± 8 years) treated in the same period (group II). Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. Four patients died during hospitalization, one aged > 75 years. In surviving patients at the end of the follow-up period, sinus rhythm was present respectively in 64% of the elderly and 74% of younger patients (p = 0.778). The rate of persistence of sinus rhythm without AF recurrences (38% vs. 41%, p = 0.705) was similar in the two groups. After surgery, sinus rhythm was frequently never regained in aged patients (27% vs. 20%, p = 0.231). Elderly patients more frequently needed permanent pacing and had more hospitalizations and a higher number of non-AF atrial tachyarrhythmias. At eight-year follow-up, survival was lower in older patients (48% aged > 75 vs. 79% aged < 75 years).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients had a similar long-term rate of stable sinus rhythm maintenance in comparison to younger patients after AF radiofrequency ablation associated with mitral valve surgery. However, they needed more frequent permanent pacing and had higher rates of hospitalizations and post-procedural atrial tachyarrhythmias. The effects of survival are difficult to evaluate due to the different life expectancies of the two groups.

Rhythmic and haemodynamic determinants of long-term survival after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery

Aims

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of sinus rhythm recovery on long-term survival after radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing surgery for mitral valve disease.

Methods and results

This study included 173 consecutive patients (101 men and 72 women, age 67 ± 9 years) with AF and mitral valve disease who underwent RF ablation procedure associated with mitral valve surgery. Four patients died during hospitalization. At the 6-year follow-up, sinus rhythm was present in 68% of the surviving patients. Thirty-nine patients remained in persistent AF after hospital discharge. In patients with stable sinus rhythm, mortality (10 vs. 30%) and recurrent hospitalization were significantly lower than in patients with persistent AF, but functional capacity improved. The incidence of stroke was also lower in patients with stable sinus rhythm. A pre-operative higher right and left atrial area, pulmonary hypertension, and rheumatic disease were associated with the persistence of AF despite RF ablation. At multivariate analysis, only age and concomitant tricuspid valve repair were independently associated with mortality, whereas the right atria area and tricuspid valve repair were associated with persistent AF.

Conclusion

Although the re-establishment of sinus rhythm by unipolar RF ablation is associated with a higher survival rate after mitral valve surgery, our data suggest that a more severe haemodynamic impairment, in particular in patients with rheumatic valve disease, may be responsible both for higher long-term mortality and lower rate of sinus rate maintenance.

Sinus Rhythm Restoration after Radiofrequency Ablation Improves Survival in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery : A Eight Year Single Center Study

Background

The usefulness of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing surgery for mitral valve has been demonstrated. But whether sinus rhythm recovery affects long-term survival is less clear.

Methods

This study included 301 consecutive patients (126 men and 175 women, age 69±6 years) undergoing radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation along with mitral valve surgery. Radiofrequency ablation was performed using unipolar probe in 55.3%, bipolar probe in the remaining 44.7% of cases.

Results

Four patients died during hospitalization. At follow-up, sinus rhythm was present in 76% of the surviving patients. 71 patients never recovered sinus rhythm after hospital discharge. Mortality and recurrent hospitalization were significantly lower in patients with sinus rhythm at the end of follow-up in comparison to permanent AF. The incidence of stroke was also lower in patients with stable sinus rhythm. Larger atria, pulmonary hypertension and history of rheumatic disease were associated with the persistence of AF despite radiofrequency ablation. Although survival and functional capacity were significantly lower in patients with permanent AF at multivariate analysis only age and pulmonary artery pressure before surgery were independently associated with mortality.

Conclusion

Sinus rhythm restoration by RF ablation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery is associated with an improved long-term survival. However our results suggest that a more severe hemodynamic impairment, expressed by higher pulmonary artery pressure, and increasing age are the only independent factors related to long-term survival.

Concomitant atrial fibrillation surgery for people undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

People with atrial fibrillation (AF) often undergo cardiac surgery for other underlying reasons and are frequently offered concomitant AF surgery to reduce the frequency of short- and long-term AF and improve short- and long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of concomitant AF surgery among people with AF who are undergoing cardiac surgery on short-term and long-term (12 months or greater) health-related outcomes, health-related quality of life, and costs.

SEARCH METHODS

Starting from the year when the first "maze" AF surgery was reported (1987), we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (March 2016), MEDLINE Ovid (March 2016), Embase Ovid (March 2016), Web of Science (March 2016), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE, April 2015), and Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA, March 2016). We searched trial registers in April 2016. We used no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of any concomitant AF surgery compared with no AF surgery among adults with preoperative AF, regardless of symptoms, who were undergoing cardiac surgery for another indication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We included outcome data on all-cause and cardiovascular-specific mortality, freedom from atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia off antiarrhythmic medications, as measured by patient electrocardiographic monitoring greater than three months after the procedure, procedural safety, 30-day rehospitalisation, need for post-discharge direct current cardioversion, health-related quality of life, and direct costs. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model when heterogeneity was low (I² ≤ 50%) and random-effects model when heterogeneity was high (I² > 50%). We evaluated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to create a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 34 reports of 22 trials (1899 participants) with five additional ongoing studies and three studies awaiting classification. All included studies were assessed as having high risk of bias across at least one domain. The effect of concomitant AF surgery on all-cause mortality was uncertain when compared with no concomitant AF surgery (7.0% versus 6.6%, RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.59, I² = 0%, 20 trials, 1829 participants, low-quality evidence), but the intervention increased freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia off antiarrhythmic medications > three months (51.0% versus 24.1%, RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.55, I² = 0%, eight trials, 649 participants, moderate-quality evidence). The effect of concomitant AF surgery on 30-day mortality was uncertain (2.3% versus 3.1%, RR 1.25 95% CI 0.71 to 2.20, I² = 0%, 18 trials, 1566 participants, low-quality evidence), but the intervention increased the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (6.0% versus 4.1%, RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.54, I² = 0%, 18 trials, 1726 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Investigator-defined adverse events, including but limited to, need for surgical re-exploration or mediastinitis, were not routinely reported but were not different between the two groups (other adverse events: 24.8% versus 23.6%, RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.34, I² = 45%, nine trials, 858 participants), but the quality of this evidence was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery, there is moderate-quality evidence that concomitant AF surgery approximately doubles the risk of freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia off anti-arrhythmic drugs while increasing the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation. The effects on mortality are uncertain. Future, high-quality and adequately powered trials will likely affect the confidence on the effect estimates of AF surgery on clinical outcomes.

Microwave Ablation in Mitral Valve Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation (MAMA)

Objective: Microwave ablation in conjunction with open heart surgery is effective in restoring sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In patients assigned for isolated mitral valve surgery no prospective randomized trial has reported its efficacy. Methods: 70 patients with longlasting AF where included from 5 different centres. They were randomly assigned to mitral valve surgery and atrial microwave ablation or mitral valve surgery alone. Results: Out of 70 randomized, 66 and 64 patients were available for evaluation at 6 and 12 months. At 12 months SR was restored and preserved in 71.0 % in the ablation group vs 36.4 % in the control group (P=0.006), corresponding figures at 6 months was 62.5 % vs 26.5 % (P=0.003). The 30-day mortality rate was 1.4 %, with one death in the ablation group vs zero deaths in the control group. At 12 months the mortality rate was 7,1 % (Ablation n=3 vs Control n=2). No significant differences existed between the groups with regard to the overall rate of serious adverse events (SAE) during the perioperative period or at the end of the study. 16 % of patients randomized to ablation were on antiarrhytmic drugs compared to 6 % in the control group after 1 year (p=0.22). Conclusion: Microwave ablation of left and right atrium in conjunction with mitral valve surgery is safe and effectively restores sinus rhythm in patients with longlasting AF as compared to mitral valve surgery alone.

Efficacy of cut-and-sew box isolation of the posterior left atrium for treatment of atrial fibrillation-long-term follow-up after a modified maze procedure

BACKGROUND

Box isolation of the posterior left atrium is one surgical or catheter ablative approach for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). In such cases, incomplete transmurality or recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after the application of various ablative techniques is considered the main reason for the recurrence of postprocedural arrhythmia. The use of solely cut-and-sew box isolation does not have these disadvantages and therefore demonstrates maximum efficacy for this therapeutic approach.

METHODS

We treated 15 patients with both an indication for open heart surgery and AF (2 paroxysmal, 6 short persistent [<12 months], and 7 long persistent [>12 months] cases) with a solely cut-and-sew box lesion. These patients were then retrospectively followed up over the long term with respect to the end point of freedom of atrial tachyarrhythmias >30 seconds.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 42 months (range, 32-84 months). Five (63%) of 8 patients with preoperative paroxysmal or short persistent AF had no arrhythmia recurrence, whereas arrhythmia recurrence was documented in all 7 patients with preoperative long persistent AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reliable transmural isolation with cut-and-sew lesions, we observed long-term arrhythmia recurrence in patients who had preoperative paroxysmal or short persistent AF, suggesting that therapy approaches that are more complex than box isolation might be needed for selected patients to achieve long-term stable sinus rhythm, despite the initially paroxysmal or short persistent character of the arrhythmia. A high rate of recurrence in patients with severe structural heart disease and preoperative long persistent AF might indicate that, in general, isolation of the left posterior atrium alone is not an adequate therapeutic approach for these patients.

Predictors of Sinus Rhythm after Radiofrequency Maze and Mitral Valve Surgery

The prevalence and predictors of postoperative sinus rhythm in patients undergoing a radiofrequency ablation maze operation and mitral valve surgery were assessed in 63 patients of whom 54 (86%) were in permanent atrial fibrillation. Operative mortality was 3.17%. At a median follow-up of 18 months, 54 (88.5%) patients were in sinus rhythm and 7 (11.5%) were in atrial fibrillation. The probability of sinus rhythm at 30 months was 92%. Left atrial diameter was the most significant prognostic factor for sinus rhythm on multivariate proportional-hazard regression analysis. The cutoff value of preoperative left atrial diameter for predicting persistent atrial fibrillation at 6 months was 6 cm (100% sensitivity and 73.6% specificity). The radiofrequency ablation maze operation can be performed in addition to mitral surgery with a high rate of successful conversion to sinus rhythm. Preoperative left atrial diameter < 6 cm is an important prognostic factor for sinus rhythm conversion.

Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation: A Worldwide Review

Maze procedure is highly effective in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) back to sinus rhythm and significantly prevents thromboembolism postoperatively. However, the procedure has not been widely performed by many surgeons, because of the technical demand and potential risk of complications of the procedure. During the past several years, the surgical strategy for AF has evolved dramatically and significantly. The evolution can be classified into two strategies: simplification of the lesion set and development of ablation devices. Isolation of the pulmonary veins with or without left atrial incisions has been shown to cure AF in selected patients. During the past decade, a number of ablation devices have been developed to replace the cut-and-sew lesions of the maze procedure and lessen the invasiveness of the procedure. The challenge in AF surgery is in the development and establishment of an off-pump thoracoscopic procedure in the patients with isolated AF. In addition to the development of ablation devices, intraoperative electrophysiological assessment of the triggers and substrates of AF for a step-by-step tailored approach and verification of conduction block over the ablation line should be established to accomplish a high success rate for AF.