Resected Synchronous Primary Malignant Lung Tumors: A Population-Based Study

The Simultaneous Bilateral Surgical Procedure for Bilateral Primary Lung Cancer

Objective: At present, the incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) is increasing, and the treatment is still a challenge. This study aims to investigate the appropriate surgical procedure for treating bilateral primary lung cancer simultaneously. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 32 patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral lung cancer surgery in our team. This data included patient characteristics, pulmonary function indicators, surgical procedures, operation duration, chest tube removal time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: Out of the 32 patients, 15 were male, and 17 were female, with an average age of 56.4 ± 8.8 years. The average maximum diameter of the main and minor tumors was 1.8 ± 1.0 cm and 1.0 ± .5 cm, respectively. All surgeries were performed thoracoscopically through intercostal approach. The procedure for the minor tumor was performed first, followed by the main tumor operation after turning over. One case was converted to thoracotomy during the main tumor operation because of bleeding. Postoperative complications occurred in one patient. No instances of respiratory insufficiency or failure were observed after the operation, and there were no perioperative deaths or readmissions within 90 days. Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral thoracoscopic surgery is deemed a secure and feasible option for eligible patients with bilateral primary lung cancer, and it is advisable to commence the operation on the minor tumor first.

Dosimetric comparison of IMPT vs VMAT for multiple lung lesions: an NTCP model-based decision-making strategy

To compare the dosimetric differences in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of multiple lung lesions and determine a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model-based decision strategy that determines which treatment modality the patient will use. A total of 41 patients were retrospectively selected for this study. The number of patients with 1-6 lesions was 5, 16, 7, 6, 3, and 4, respectively. A prescription dose of 70 GyRBE in 10 fractions was given to each lesion. SBRT plans were generated using VMAT and IMPT. All the IMPT plans used robustness optimization with ± 3.5% range uncertainties and 5 mm setup uncertainties. Dosimetric metrics and the predicted NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis (RP), esophagitis, and pericarditis were analyzed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits between different planning groups. In addition, a threshold for the ratio of PTV to lungs (%) to determine whether a patient would benefit highly from IMPT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. All plans reached target coverage (V70GyRBE ≥ 95%). Compared with VMAT, IMPT resulted in a significantly lower dose of most thoracic normal tissues. For the 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 lesion groups, the lung V5 was 29.90 ± 9.44%, 58.33 ± 13.35%, and 81.02 ± 5.91% for VMAT and 11.34 ± 3.11% (p < 0.001), 21.45 ± 3.80% (p < 0.001), and 32.48 ± 4.90% (p < 0.001) for IMPT, respectively. The lung V20 was 12.07 ± 4.94%, 25.57 ± 6.54%, and 43.99 ± 11.83% for VMAT and 6.76 ± 1.80% (p < 0.001), 13.14 ± 2.27% (p < 0.01), and 19.62 ± 3.48% (p < 0.01) for IMPT. The Dmean of the total lung was 7.65 ± 2.47 GyRBE, 14.78 ± 2.75 GyRBE, and 21.64 ± 4.07 GyRBE for VMAT and 3.69 ± 1.04 GyRBE (p < 0.001), 7.13 ± 1.41 GyRBE (p < 0.001), and 10.69 ± 1.81 GyRBE (p < 0.001) for IMPT. Additionally, in the VMAT group, the maximum NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis was 73.91%, whereas it was significantly lower in the IMPT group at 10.73%. The accuracy of our NTCP model-based decision model, which combines the number of lesions and PTV/Lungs (%), was 97.6%. The study demonstrated that the IMPT SBRT for multiple lung lesions had satisfactory dosimetry results, even when the number of lesions reached 6. The NTCP model-based decision strategy presented in our study could serve as an effective tool in clinical practice, aiding in the selection of the optimal treatment modality between VMAT and IMPT.

Two Different Tumors and Lung Aspergilloma: An Uncommon Etiopathogenic Association

Several cases reported in the literature have confirmed the link between pulmonary aspergillosis and various malignant diseases. Furthermore, it has been observed that the correlation between carcinoid tumor and lung adenocarcinoma is quite uncommon. The etiopathogenic mechanisms underlying these correlations remain poorly defined. We present the case of a patient with three of these diseases: a lung adenocarcinoma with a lepidic pattern, a typical carcinoid, and pulmonary aspergillosis. An additional noteworthy aspect of this case pertains to the timely detection of both lung malignancies. Thus, the necessity for further investigation to ascertain the pathogenic connection among the three diseases is underscored. The ultimate objective is to enhance the prognosis of individuals diagnosed with lung cancer, which is a prevailing malignant disease on a global scale.

Surgery for M1A Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Additional Pulmonary Nodules in a Contralateral Lobe

INTRODUCTION

Limited consensus exists on the optimal treatment strategy for clinical M1a non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting as a primary tumor with additional intrapulmonary nodules in a contralateral lobe ("M1a-Contra"). This study sought to compare long-term survival of patients with M1a-Contra tumors receiving multimodal therapy with versus without thoracic surgery.

METHODS

Overall survival of patients with cT1-4, N0-3, M1a NSCLC with contralateral intrapulmonary nodules who received surgery as part of multimodal therapy ("Thoracic Surgery") versus systemic therapy with or without radiation ("No Thoracic Surgery") in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015 was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of the 5042 patients who satisfied study inclusion criteria, 357 (7.1%) received multimodal therapy including surgery. In multivariable-adjusted analysis, the Thoracic Surgery cohort had better overall survival than the No Thoracic Surgery cohort (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56-0.79, P < 0.001). In a propensity score-matched analysis of 386 patients, well-balanced on 12 common prognostic covariates, the Thoracic Surgery group had better 5-year overall survival than the No Thoracic Surgery group (P = 0.020). In propensity score-matched analyses stratified by clinical N status, Thoracic Surgery was associated with better overall survival than No Thoracic Surgery for patients with cN0 disease and cN1-2 disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, multimodal treatment including surgery was associated with better overall survival than systemic therapy with or without radiation without surgery for patients with M1a-Contra tumors. These preliminary findings highlight the importance of further evaluation of surgery in a multidisciplinary treatment setting for M1a-Contra tumors.

Long-Term Survival of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging Descriptors for Clinical M1a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging manual for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) M1a descriptors includes tumors presenting with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion (ie, M1a-Effusion), pleural or pericardial nodule(s) (ie, M1a-Pleural), or separate tumor nodule(s) in a contralateral lobe (ie, M1a-Contralateral).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is M1a NSCLC presenting with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion associated with worse survival compared with other types of M1a NSCLC?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with cT1-4, N0-3, M1a NSCLC (satisfying a single M1a descriptor of M1a-Effusion, M1a-Pleural, or M1a-Contralateral), according to AJCC eighth edition staging criteria, in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015 were included. Overall survival was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of the 25,716 patients who met study eligibility criteria, 12,756 (49.6%) presented with M1a-Effusion tumors, 3,589 (14.0%) with M1a-Pleural tumors, and 9,371 (36.4%) with M1a-Contralateral tumors. In multivariable-adjusted analysis, compared to M1a-Effusion tumors, both M1a-Pleural tumors (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64-0.71; P < .001) and M1a-Contralateral tumors (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.69; P < .001) were associated with better overall survival. No significant differences were found in overall survival between patients with M1a-Pleural tumors vs M1a-Contralateral tumors. In a propensity score-matched analysis of 5,581 patients with M1a-Effusion tumors and 5,581 patients with other M1a tumors (ie, M1a-Contralateral or M1a-Effusion), those with M1a-Effusion tumors had worse 5-year overall survival than patients with other M1a tumors (M1a-Effusion 6.4% [95% CI, 5.7-7.1] vs M1a-Other 10.6% [95% CI, 9.7-11.5]; P < .001).

INTERPRETATION

In this national analysis of AJCC 8th edition cT1-4, N0-3, M1a NSCLC, tumors with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion were associated with worse overall survival than tumors with either pleural or contralateral pulmonary nodules. These findings may be taken into consideration for the upcoming ninth edition of the AJCC lung cancer staging guidelines.

Immune microenvironment heterogeneity of concurrent adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in multiple primary lung cancers

The molecular profiles and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) presenting as concurrent lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) remain unknown. We aimed to clarify these factors. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) for five patients with concurrent ADC and SQCC. We found the genetic mutations were similar between ADC and SQCC groups. RNA-Seq revealed that the gene expression and pathways enriched in ADC and SQCC groups were quite different. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSVA) showed that nine gene sets were significantly differentially expressed between the ADC and SQCC groups (p < 0.05), with four gene sets relevant to squamous cell features upregulated in the SQCC group and five gene sets upregulated in the ADC group. Reactome enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes showed that the immune function-related pathways, including programmed cell death, innate immune system, interleukin-12 family signaling, and toll-like receptor 2/4 pathways, etc. were significantly enriched. Transcriptomic TIME analysis, with mIHC in patient specimens and in vivo validation, showed tumor-infiltrating immune cells were significantly more enriched and diverse in ADC, especially CD8 + T cells. Our results revealed that the transcriptomic profiles and TIME features were quite different between ADC and SQCC lesions. ADC lesions exhibited a more active TIME than SQCC lesions in MPLCs.

Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in the treatment of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Although synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (sMPLCs) are common in clinical practice, the choice of surgical modalities for the main lesion is still at the stage of exploration. This study is designed to analyze the prognosis of sMPLCs and single primary lung cancers with similar tumor stages and to explore whether sublobar resection has a similar prognosis as lobectomy for sMPLCs.

METHODS

One-hundred forty-one cases of sMPLCs were selected, including the following: 65 cases underwent lobectomy for main lesions, and 76 cases underwent sublobar resection for main lesions. One thousand one hundred forty-four cases of single primary lung cancer were matched at 1:1 by propensity score matching. Then, the patients with sMPLCs were divided into a lobectomy group and a sublobar group according to the first tumor stage. Ninety-eight cases of patients with sMPLCs were matched. The short-term perioperative effect, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in OS between sMPLCs and single primary lung cancer after lobectomy (77.1% vs. 77.2%, P = 0.157) and sublobar resection (98.7% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.309). There was no significant difference in OS (86.7% vs. 83.9%, P = 0.482) or DFS (67.6 vs. 87.7%, P = 0.324) between the lobectomy group and sublobar group with sMPLCs. The sublobar resection group obtained a lower incidence of postoperative complications (40.8% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.007) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.22 vs. 9.27, P = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with sMPLCs generally depends on the main tumor state, which has no statistical difference regardless of sublobar resection or lobectomy, and the perioperative period of sublobar resection is safer than that of lobectomy.

Association of the Extent of Resection with Survival in Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) has progressively increased, due to recent advances in imaging. To date, no guidelines defining recommendations for patients' selection and no standard treatment of cases with SMPLC have been defined.The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess survival among patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection MPLC.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and ongoing studies was performed according to a prospectively registered design (PROSPERO: CRD42019115487). All studies published between 1998 and December 2020 that examined treatments with lobectomy compared to sublobar resection were included. Two double-blind investigators independently selected articles.Primary outcomes were to assess the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate among patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection and the impact of lymph node status on 5-year OS and 5-year disease-free survival in patients with MPLC.

RESULTS

The search yielded 424 articles; 4 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and collectively evaluated 298 patients with a mean age ranging from 61.5 to 67 years. A total of 112 patients were treated for bilateral synchronous tumors and 186 patients for unilateral multiple synchronous tumors. All included studies showed that the type of resection, lobectomy or limited resection, had no significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Limited resection is a valuable treatment option for MPLC. However, the clinical level of evidence of the studies found is low and randomized studies are needed to clarify the extent of resection in MPLC.

Prognostic Factors for Survival in Multiple Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 283 Patients

Purpose: In recent years, a rising number of multiple primary lung cancers have been detected with the advancement of imaging technology. No detailed study has assessed the prognosis of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas based on computed tomography characteristics. The present study aimed to analyze outcomes and determine valuable factors for predicting the prognosis of multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: This single-center retrospective study was performed from January 2013 to October 2021. All patients were divided into 3 groups based on tumor density as follows: multi-pure ground-glass nodules, at least one part-solid nodule without solid nodules, and at least one solid nodule. Clinicopathologic features, computed tomography signs, and survival outcomes were compared between these groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors for recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Results: The sample included 283 patients with 623 lesions who met the inclusion criteria for multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma. Of these patients, 71 (25.1%) presented with multi-pure ground-glass nodules, 100 (35.3%) with at least one part-solid nodule without solid nodule, and 112 (39.6%) with at least one solid nodule. The 3 groups had distinguished clinicopathologic and radiological features of age, adjuvant therapy, types of tumor resection, TNM stage, pathological subtypes, pleural indentation, spicule, and vacuole (all P < .001). Multivariate analysis found that lesion number was an independent predictor for both recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.41; 95% confidence interval 1.12-5.19; P = .025) and overall survival (hazard ratio 4.78; 95% confidence interval 1.88-12.18; P = .001), and the at least one solid nodule was an independent predictor for overall survival (hazard ratio 5.307; 95% confidence interval 1.16-24.31; P = .032). Stage III (hazard ratio 5.71; 95% confidence interval 1.94-16.81; P = .002) and adjuvant therapy (hazard ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval 1.24-5.13; P = .011) influenced the recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: Survival of multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma patients is strongly correlated with the lesion number and the at least one solid nodule tumors in radiological. This information may be useful for predicting survival and making clinical decisions in future studies.

The High Proportion of Discordant EGFR Mutations among Multiple Lung Tumors

The prevalence of multiple lung cancers has been increasing recently. Molecular analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in individual tumors of multiple lung cancers is essential for devising an optimal therapeutic strategy. The EGFR mutation status in multiple lung cancers was evaluated to determine its therapeutic implications. In total, 208 tumors from 101 patients who underwent surgery for multiple lung cancers were analyzed. Individual tumors were subjected to histological evaluation and EGFR analysis using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, EGFR-wildtype tumors were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS). EGFR mutations were detected in 113 tumors from 72 patients, predominantly in females (p < 0.001) and non-smokers (p < 0.001). Among patients with at least one EGFR-mutant tumor, approximately 72% of patients (52/72) had different EGFR mutations in individual tumors. NGS analysis of EGFR-wildtype tumors from 12 patients revealed four and eight cases with concordant and discordant molecular alterations, respectively. These findings revealed a high proportion of discordant EGFR mutations among multiple lung tumors. Hence, EGFR analysis of individual tumors of multiple lung tumors is essential for the evaluation of clonality and the development of an optimal treatment strategy.

Radiological classification, gene-mutation status, and surgical prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the radiological classification, gene-mutation status, and surgical prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC).

METHODS

From January 2013 to October 2019, 192 consecutive patients with sMPLC were investigated. The clinical, CT, molecular, and pathological features of all patients were analyzed. Furthermore, the prognosis of 89 patients who only underwent surgical resection was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 192 patients, all lesions pathologically confirmed or highly suspected as tumors based on radiological findings were retrospectively analyzed, and the CT findings of sMPLC were classified into three types: (I) all lesions manifested as solid nodules/masses (14.06%, 27/192), (II) all lesions manifested as subsolid nodules/masses (43.23%, 83/192), and (III) tumor lesions manifested as a combination of ≥ 2 of the following patterns: solid nodules/masses, subsolid nodules/masses, cystic airspace, and focal consolidation (42.71%, 82/192). For 252 tumors undergoing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation testing, the EGFR-mutation rate was higher in subsolid tumors than that in solid tumors (p < 0.05). Among 19 patients with all tumors undergoing surgery and driver-gene testing, genetic heterogeneity was prevalent among the multiple tumors (63.16%,12/19). The highest clinical stage of non-I, ipsilateral distribution of tumors, and CT classification of I indicated a poor prognosis for patients with sMPLC (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Subsolid lesions are the most common presentation of sMPLC. Genetic heterogeneity in driver mutations among sMPLC may be present. Prognosis in patients with sMPLC is determined by the highest clinical TNM stage, distribution, and radiological classification among the multiple tumors.

KEY POINTS

• Synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) has three types of CT findings. • Genetic heterogeneity may be prevalent among the multiple tumors. • Prognosis in patients with sMPLC is associated with the highest clinical TNM stage, distribution, and radiological classification among the multiple tumors.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Characteristics and prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer after surgical treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

Background

This study aims to quantitatively summary the characteristics of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC), postoperative mortality, long‐term prognosis, and prognostic effects of potential clinical parameters in patients with sMPLC after surgery.

Methods

PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify studies that explored the prognosis of patients with sMPLC after surgery.

Results

Fifty‐two studies with 3486 participants were included, and clinical characteristics were quantitatively summarized. The pooled proportion of sMPLC in lung cancer was 2.0% (95%CI, 1.6%–2.5%) with an increasing trend over time, and postoperative mortality was 1.4% (95%CI, 0.5%–2.7%) with a decreasing trend over time. The 5‐year survival rate was 44.9% (95%CI, 37.4%–52.6%) and all long‐term survival rates showed increasing trends over time. Poor long‐term prognosis was observed in both limited resection (HR = 1.357, 95%CI, 1.047–1.759, p = 0.0210) and pneumonectomy (HR = 2.643, 95%CI, 1.539–4.541, p = 0.0004) by comparison of anatomical resection. Other clinical parameters of age, gender, smoking status, FEV1, and lymph node metastasis significantly impacted the long‐term prognosis (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The proportion of sMPLC in lung cancer and 5‐year survival rate are increasing, while postoperative mortality is decreasing trend over time. Lobectomy should be preferred, while pneumonectomy should be avoided for sMPLC. Age, gender, FEV1, smoking, tumor size, surgical methods, and lymph node status are prognostic factors for sMPLC. Considering the heterogeneity and publication bias, these findings should be treated with caution.

Surgical Prognosis of Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the long-term prognosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) patients after surgical treatment and explored prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed regarding the surgical prognosis of SMPLC. A literature search was performed using online databases. All studies were rigorously categorized following the 8th edition of the tumor, node, metastasis classification (TNM) staging rules for multiple lung cancers: SMPLC and multifocal ground-glass/lepidic (GG/L) lung cancers. Five-year OS after surgery was pooled, and hazard ratios (HRs) for prognostic factors were synthesized. Specific subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted (PROSPERO registration CRD42019142420).

RESULTS

An analysis of 26 studies including 1788 patients was performed. The pooled 5-year OS was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37-53) of true SMPLC patients and 62% (95% CI, 57-67) of patients with pathologic stage I disease, which was different from the 5-year OS of 93% (95% CI, 85-100) of patients with multifocal GG/L lung cancers. Poor prognostic factors for SMPLC were lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.75-3.20; P < .001) and pneumonectomy (HR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.36-6.45; P = .006], whereas histology (HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; P = .508), laterality (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.44, P = .190), sublobar resection (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.90-1.84; P = .159), and adjuvant therapy (HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.80; P = .791) were not found to influence the outcome.

CONCLUSION

The long-term prognosis of SMPLC patients after surgery is acceptable, especially in patients with early-stage disease. Sublobar resection can be applied, although pneumonectomy should be avoided. Advanced criteria are needed to diagnose SMPLC and distinguish it from multifocal GG/L lung cancer to perform accurate surgical evaluation.

Multiple Primary Lung Cancers: A New Challenge in the Era of Precision Medicine

With the widespread implementation of lung cancer screening, more and more patients are being diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). In the era of precision medicine, many controversies remain in differentiating MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis and the optimum treatment choice, especially in patients exhibiting similar histology. In this review, we summarize common diagnostic criteria and novel discrimination methods with a special emphasis on the emerging value of broad panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the diagnosis of MPLCs. We then discuss current advances regarding therapeutic approaches for MPLCs. Radical surgery is the main treatment modality, while stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is safe and feasible for early-stage MPLC patients with inoperable tumors. In addition, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are emerging therapeutic strategies that are still in their infancy. Characteristics of both genomic profiles and tumor microenvironment are currently being evaluated but warrant further exploration to facilitate the application of targeted systematic therapies in MPLC patients.

Distinguishing multiple lung primaries from intra-pulmonary metastases and treatment implications

INTRODUCTION

The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers and intra-pulmonary metastases has been extensively investigated because of its important clinical and therapeutic implications.

AREAS COVERED

Rapidly improving imaging technology and genomic analysis has led to a finer discrimination between multiple primary lung tumors and pulmonary metastases. However, over the past few decades, standardized criteria for the identification of multiple lung tumors have been lacking. Therefore, in 2017 a multidisciplinary international committee composed of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) addressed this problem when drawing up the 8th edition of TMN stage classification, that now represents a specific consensus on this topic. The most advanced diagnostic strategies associated with screening allow for the detection of early stage synchronous lung cancers.

EXPERT OPINION

Although diagnostic confirmation relies on pathologic and clinical examination, new molecular analyses help in the discrimination between primary and secondary tumors. The treatment of multiple primary lung tumors remains, whenever possible, a local treatment based on surgical resection, providing the absence of distant or local (lymph node) metastases.

Isolated Renal Metastasis from Primary Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Synchronous Small Cell Lung Cancer

Synchronous multiple primary lung cancer is a unique type of lung carcinomas that are diagnosed with more than two different pathological types in the same or different lung lobes. Isolated metastasis to the kidney is considered rare. Herein, we present a case of a 58-year-old male with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 40 pack-year of cigarette smoking, who was diagnosed with synchronous small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with isolated metastasis to the kidney. Isolated kidney metastasis from lung cancer is an infrequent finding; it should be considered when the patient is diagnosed with lung cancer. In the absence of disseminated disease and contraindications, nephrectomy is an option for treatment with chemotherapy or as a palliative measure if the patient is symptomatic.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy in lung cancer: an emerging standard

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Significant advances have been made in the field of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of pulmonary neoplasms in recent years. This review aims to summarize recent salient evidence on SABR for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC).

RECENT FINDINGS

In medically inoperable patients, SABR remains the standard of care. The optimal SABR dosing regimen is being studied. Comparisons with non-SABR radiotherapy regimens with lower doses per fraction revealed benefit of SABR. In operable patients, no prospective clinical trial comparing SABR and surgery has been completed, although multiple trials are currently underway to address this question. SABR is generally cost-effective and safe in most patients, with preserved patient-reported quality of life. However, increased toxicity with SABR is noted in patients with disease close to, or invading the proximal tracheobronchial tree. Significant SABR-related toxicity and mortality is also reported in patients with coexisting interstitial lung disease. Considerations on pathologic confirmation, surveillance and multiple primaries are also addressed.

SUMMARY

SABR is an effective and safe treatment for inoperable ES-NSCLC. Ongoing trials and comparative effectiveness research will help to clarify SABR's role in various lung cancer indications going forward.

Multiple primary lung cancer: a rising challenge

With the use of high-resolution chest imaging system and lung cancer screening program, patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are becoming a growing population in clinical practice worldwide. The diagnostic criteria for MPLCs has been established and modified by three major lung cancer research institutes. However, due to the fact that the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and a recurrence, metastatic, or satellite lesion arising from the original lesion remains ambiguous and confusing, there is still insufficient evidence to support a uniform guideline. Newly developed molecular and genomic methods have the potential to better define the relationship among multiple lesions and bring the possibility of targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the first choice for the treatment of MPLCs and detailed strategy should be carefully planned taking characteristics of the tumor and status of patients into consideration. For those who are intolerant to surgery, a new technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now an optional therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, multiple GGOs are unique MPLCs that need special attentions in the clinical practice.

Efficacy of repeated surgery is superior to that of non-surgery for recurrent/second primary lung cancer after initial operation for primary lung cancer

Background

The current study aimed to determine the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of multiple pulmonary resections (MPRs) after prior curative surgery for local regional recurrent or second primary lung cancers.

Methods

All cases of lung cancer included in our prospective database between January 2000 and July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The oncological efficacy endpoints for synchronous and metachronous MPR were five‐year overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates after the second surgery. The surgical safety endpoints were postoperative mortality and complications (Clavien‐Dindo classification) within 30 days.

Results

In total, 67 MPR cases were identified. There were no significant differences in the five‐year OS and DFS between the synchronous MPR group (n = 50) and the propensity score‐matched solitary major pulmonary resection group (n = 250) (5‐year OS 84.5% vs. 69.0%, log rank P = 0.112; DFS 64.4% vs. 58.0%, log rank P = 0.278). The five‐year OS and PFS of the metachronous MPR group (n = 17) were significantly better than those in the non‐surgical control group (n = 19) (5‐year OS 94.1% vs. 50.7%, log rank P = 0.005; 5‐year PFS 53.9% vs. 10.5%, log rank P = 0.020). No postoperative mortality or severe complications occurred in the MPR group.

Conclusion

The oncological efficacy of MPR is superior to the non‐surgical approach for the management of local regional recurrent or second primary lung cancer, with comparable postoperative mortality and complications.

Coexistent Non-Small Cell Carcinoma and Small Cell Carcinoma in a Patient Presenting with Hyponatremia

Despite recent advances in screening methods, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. By the time lung cancer becomes symptomatic and patients seek treatment, it is often too advanced for curative measures. Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening has been shown to reduce mortality in patients at high risk of lung cancer. We present a 66-year-old man with a 50-pack-year smoking history who had a right upper lobe (RUL) pulmonary nodule and left lower lobe (LLL) consolidation on a screening CT. He reported a weight loss of 45 pounds over 3 months, had recently been hospitalized for hyponatremia, and was notably cachectic. A CT of the chest showed a stable LLL mass-like consolidation and a 9 × 21 mm subsolid lesion in the RUL. Navigational bronchoscopy biopsy of the RUL lesion revealed squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of the LLL lesion revealed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The final diagnosis was a right-sided Stage I NSCLC (squamous) and a left-sided limited SCLC. The RUL NSCLC was treated with stereotactic radiation; the LLL SCLC was treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. In patients with multiple lung nodules, a diagnosis of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) is crucial, as inadvertent upstaging of patients with MPLC (to T3 and/or T4 tumors) can lead to erroneous staging, inaccurate prognosis, and improper treatment. Recent advances in the diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules via navigational bronchoscopy and management of these lesions dramatically affect a patient's overall prognosis.

[Clinical and Prognosic Anylasis of 30 Cases with Double Primary Lung Cancer]

背景与目的

多原发肺癌（multiple primary lung cancer, MPLC）是一种临床中较为少见的肺癌类型，双原发肺癌（double primary lung cancer, DPLC）是其中最常见的一种，近年来由于诊疗手段的进步检出率逐渐升高。本研究总结分析了30例DPLC患者的临床资料，以期为DPLC的诊疗提供理论依据。

方法

回顾郑州大学附属肿瘤医院2010年1月-2015年12月收治的30例DPLC患者的临床资料，对临床特征及预后相关因素进行分析。

结果

30例中，同时性双原发癌（synchronous DPLC, sDPLC）占3例（3/30, 10%），异时性双原发癌（metachronous DPLC, mDPLC）占27例（27/30, 90.0%）。病灶好发于右肺上叶（20/60, 33.3%），病理类型以腺癌（25/60, 41.7%）为主，病理类型相同者（17/30, 56.7%）多于不同者（13/30, 43.3%），病理类型相同者以腺-腺（10/16, 62.5%）最常见。生存分析显示淋巴结转移（HR=4.349, 95%CI: 1.435-13.178, P=0.009）和重度吸烟史（HR=2.996, 95%CI: 1.089-8.240, P=0.034）是DPLC的不良预后因素。

结论

DPLC好发于右肺上叶，病理类型以腺癌为主，早期诊断、积极的治疗和严格的戒烟策略有望改善其预后。

Simultaneous evolutionary expansion and constraint of genomic heterogeneity in multifocal lung cancer

Recent genomic analyses have revealed substantial tumor heterogeneity across various cancers. However, it remains unclear whether and how genomic heterogeneity is constrained during tumor evolution. Here, we sequence a unique cohort of multiple synchronous lung cancers (MSLCs) to determine the relative diversity and uniformity of genetic drivers upon identical germline and environmental background. We find that each multicentric primary tumor harbors distinct oncogenic alterations, including novel mutations that are experimentally demonstrated to be functional and therapeutically targetable. However, functional studies show a strikingly constrained tumorigenic pathway underlying heterogeneous genetic variants. These results suggest that although the mutation-specific routes that cells take during oncogenesis are stochastic, genetic trajectories may be constrained by selection for functional convergence on key signaling pathways. Our findings highlight the robust evolutionary pressures that simultaneously shape the expansion and constraint of genomic diversity, a principle that holds important implications for understanding tumor evolution and optimizing therapeutic strategies.Across cancer types tumor heterogeneity has been observed, but how this relates to tumor evolution is unclear. Here, the authors sequence multiple synchronous lung cancers, highlighting the evolutionary pressures that simultaneously shape the expansion and constraint of genomic heterogeneity.

Synchronous mucinous and non-mucinous lung adenocarcinomas with different epidermal growth mutational status

In recent years, the spread of more-sensitive diagnostic methods has resulted in an increase of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, its occurrence is still rare. Distinction between synchronous lesions from second independent primary tumors is a problem when dealing with multiple lung tumors, particularly if the histological type is the same. We present a case report of a 78-year-old female patient referred to our institution due to pneumonia. A subsequent thoracic computed tomography (CT) was performed showing two suspicious lesions, one in the right upper lobe and the other in the right inferior lobe. The CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of both pulmonary lesions revealed two adenocarcinomas, but with a rare combination of distinct morphologic variants, as well as different immunophenotypes and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene status. The patient refused surgery and was submitted to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). She maintained tight follow-up and until now, she has not shown any signs of relapse or metastasis. A multidisciplinary approach with clinical, morphologic and molecular evaluation in multiple lung cancer is important to diagnosis and treatment guidance.

Surgery in oligometastatic NSCLC patients in the targeted therapy era

More than 50% of NSCLC patients present with metastatic disease at first diagnosis, with a median survival of 8-11 months. However, selected patients with oligometastatic disease who receive appropriate local therapy for both the primary lesion and metastases enjoy long-term survival or are even cured. The new (eighth) edition of the tumor, node and metastasis classification of lung cancer suggests that patients with a single metastatic lesion in one distant organ should be placed into a new category, M1b, which will certainly lead to more applications of local therapy in such subpopulations. Moreover, as the applications of targeted therapy increase, surgery will play an evermore critical role in eliminating drug-resistant cancer clones of patients who exhibit mixed responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The lung, brain and adrenal gland are the most common oligometastatic organs, and are reviewed separately.

Impact of a Contralateral Tumor Nodule on Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Contralateral lung tumors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are classified as stage M1a yet may represent hematogenous metastases or synchronous primary tumors. The impact of these tumors on overall survival (OS) is poorly understood. Here, we aim to determine whether NSCLC patients with M1a disease due only to a contralateral tumor nodule exhibit a favorable prognosis relative to other M1a or M1b patients.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of the impact of contralateral tumor nodules on OS in NSCLC stratified by primary tumor size and N stage attained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

RESULTS

Of 173,640 patients, 5161 M1a-contra patients were identified. Median and 3-year OS for these patients exceeded that of patients with M1b (p < 0.0001) or other M1a disease (p < 0.0001). Primary tumor size and N stage were strongly associated with OS in M1a-contra patients. Three-year OS demonstrated a delayed convergence between M1a-contra and other M1a patients with primary tumors greater than or equal to 3 cm or mediastinal lymph node involvement. Proportional hazard modeling indicated that T1-2N0-1M1a-contra patients exhibit OS not significantly different (p = 0.258) from that predicted with comparable T and N stage disease plus a second early-stage primary.

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral tumors in NSCLC carry a more favorable prognosis than other M1a or M1b disease. Primary tumor size and N stage may help distinguish M1a-contra patients with hematogenous metastasis from those with a synchronous, second primary.

Surgical Outcomes of Synchronous Multiple Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

The prognostic indicators for synchronous multiple primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vary across reports. In present study, the prognostic factors for the patients with synchronous multiple primary NSCLC were analyzed in a large cohort. A total of 285 patients with synchronous multiple primary NSCLC who underwent radical surgical resection and with complete follow-up information were included in this study. The Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for risk factors evaluation. Among them, 94 (33.0%) patients had bilateral tumors and 51 (17.9%) had multiple (≥3) tumors. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate was 58.7% and 77.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified parameters conferring shorter OS including male gender, symptomatic disease, negative family history, large maximal tumor size, not all adenocarcinomas, advanced highest T stage, and lymph node involvement. Multivariate analysis showed that male gender (p = 0.020), symptomatic disease (p = 0.017), and lymph node involvement (p < 0.001) were independent adverse prognosticators. For patients with multiple adenocarcinomas, the 5-year DFS and OS rate was 59.6% and 82.4%, respectively. The subtypes other than lepidic predominant (p < 0.001) and lymph node involvement (p = 0.002) were the independent unfavorable prognosticators. In conclusion, we identified independent prognosticators which will provide the valuable clues for postoperative management of patients with synchronous multiple primary NSCLC.

SUVmax and Tumor Size Predict Surgical Outcome of Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancers

To assess surgical outcomes in synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) and correlations with clinicopathological features and prognostic/predictive factors.We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2006 and June 2012. In total, 564 patients with resectable NSCLC underwent a preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan followed by anatomic resection. We reviewed the clinical features of 35 SMPLC patients. Surgical outcomes, prognosis, and tumor imaging features were evaluated (median follow-up = 44 months).In total, 35 eligible SMPLC patients (6.21%) were identified (11 men [31%], 24 women [69%], mean age = 65 years]). The tumors were bilateral in 17 patients (49%) and in different lobes of the ipsilateral lung in 18 patients (51%). Most patients (26/35, 74%) had 2 primary tumors, and 26% (9/35) had more than 2 tumors (6 with 3 tumors; 3 with 4 tumors). The median size of the most advanced tumor was 3.0 cm (range 0.9-54). The median standard uptake value (SUV) of the largest tumor was 3.1 (range 1.0-13.3). The patients were treated as follows: 30 lobectomies, 2 sublobar resections, 2 sequential bilateral lobectomies, and 1 bi-lobectomy. Twenty-four patients (69%) received adjuvant therapy. The overall cumulative 5-year survival was 91.5% (median overall survival = 45.5 months). Patients with a reference tumor ≤ 3 cm and SUV ≤ 3.1 had an expected 5-year survival of 100%. Patients with a reference tumor > 3 cm and SUV > 3.1 had an expected 5-year survival rate of 53.3%.SMPLC patients can benefit from aggressive surgery. The size and SUVmax of the reference tumor may predict postoperative outcomes.

Pathologic Staging and Survival of Patients With Synchronous Bilateral Lung Carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To compare survival data in patients with resected bilateral synchronous pulmonary carcinomas with survival data from patients with lung cancer in pStages I through IV and to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive histologic evaluation (CHE) of tumor histologic patterns to distinguish between synchronous primaries and intrapulmonary metastases.

METHODS

Ten-year overall survival (OS) data from 18 patients with 44 resected synchronous bilateral lung cancers, classified as "synchronous primaries" or "metastases" using CHE, were compared with survival data of 2,879 patients with lung cancer in pStages I through IV.

RESULTS

Forty and four tumors from 16 and two patients, respectively, were classified as synchronous primaries and metastases. There were no significant differences in survival between these 18 patients and pStage I controls or between the synchronous primaries and the metastases patient groups. However, there were significant differences in survival between the patients with resected synchronous bilateral tumors and each of the pStage II through IV control groups (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with resected synchronous bilateral lung cancers had similar 10-year OS to patients with stage I disease, regardless of CHE data. Most resected tumors were synchronous primaries by CHE.

Aerogenous metastases: a potential game changer in the diagnosis and management of primary lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this article are to summarize the relevant literature on aerogenous metastasis, explain the putative pathogenetic mechanism of aerogenous spread, present the characteristic imaging and pathologic features, and review the importance of aerogenous spread to staging and clinical management.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative evidence suggests that aerogenous spread may exist and is underrecognized. Imaging features are helpful in differentiating possible aerogenous spread of tumor from hematogenous and lymphatic metastases and from synchronous primary tumors. The putative occurrence of intrapulmonary aerogenous metastasis of lung cancer has staging, management, and prognostic implications.

A case of synchronous double primary lung cancer presenting with pleomorphic carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

Patient: Male, 69

Final Diagnosis: Lung cancer

Symptoms: Anemia

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Lobectomy

Specialty: Oncology

Unusual synchronous lung tumors: mucoepidermoid carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma

Primary mucoepidermoid tumors of the lung are rare entities. Synchronous primary malignancies of the lung involving mucoepidermoid carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma are even rarer and constitute a unique set of patient population. The presentation, diagnosis and treatment strategies for this patient population are not well described. In most cases, the diagnosis of synchronous primary lung malignancy is made after pathological examination of the resected lung specimen. Molecular and genetic analysis is now being used to supplement the diagnosis of synchronous primary lung malignancies. In this work, we briefly discuss the current state of knowledge of this unique combination of primary lung malignancies and describe the clinical presentation and management of a patient with a rare combination of synchronous primary lung malignancies.

KRAS mutational analysis and immunohistochemical studies can help distinguish pancreatic metastases from primary lung adenocarcinomas

Lung metastases from primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas often have mucinous features, which makes them difficult to distinguish from the primary lung adenocarcinoma. We explored the potential utility of KRAS mutational status and immunohistochemical studies in the evaluation of adenocarcinomas in the lungs of patients with known pancreatic cancer. Metastatic pancreatic cancer cases had fewer solitary lung lesions (5 (15%) versus 37 (95%) for lung primaries; P=0.0001), more tumors with pure (100%) mucinous morphology (16 (50%) versus 9 (23%) for lung primaries; P=0.0037), and more frequent KRAS mutations (24 (75%) versus 18 (46%) for lung primaries; P=0.0093). Presence of the KRAS G12C mutation had 96% specificity and positive predictive value for lung adenocarcinoma, whereas G12R was 99% specific for pancreatic cancer with a positive predictive value of 86%. Of the 18 KRAS mutated mucinous lung tumors, only 3 (16%) occurred in nonsmokers. Conversely, of the 19 KRAS mutated pancreatic cancer metastases, 11 (58%) occurred in nonsmokers. The median overall survival was significantly shorter for patients with metastatic tumors when compared with patients with primary mucinous tumors (19 months, 95% confidence interval, 10-28 months versus 55 months, 95% confidence interval, 39-70 months, P=0.005). CK20 and CDX2 positivity supported metastatic pancreatic cancer, whereas TTF-1 positivity supported primary lung adenocarcinoma. In summary, KRAS G12C mutations, TTF-1, and napsin A were associated with primary lung adenocarcinoma, whereas KRAS G12R mutations, CK20, and CDX2 favored pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We showed survival differences for patients whose pancreatic metastases were synchronous versus metachronous to their primary tumors, and for patients with mucinous pancreatic cancer metastases versus primary mucinous lung adenocarcinomas. Differences in KRAS mutations reflect differences in exposure to tobacco smoking and highlight biological differences between two KRAS oncogene-driven cancers.

Surgical results of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: similar to the stage-matched solitary primary lung cancers?

BACKGROUND

Treatment for synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (SMPLC) remains controversial. Some surgeons treat SMPLC like advanced lung cancer, whereas other surgeons treat SMPLC as separate primary lung cancers. In this study, survival of SMPLC patients and matched-stage solitary primary lung cancer (SPLC) patients after surgical treatment were compared.

METHODS

Prospective medical records between 2001 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,995 patients underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer in a tertiary referral center. Only 97 patients met the modified criteria of Martini and Melamed for SMPLC. The median follow-up time was 38.3 months. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 83.1% and 69.6%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, males, smokers, and tumor size greater than 3 cm demonstrated significantly worse survival. After multivariate analysis, only tumor size (p = 0.018; hazard ratio 3.199) was identified as an independent predictor of survival. In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the matched-stage SMPLC and SPLC without mediastinal lymph node involvement. Subgroup analysis in the multiple synchronous adenocarcinoma (n = 78) group demonstrated no significant difference between similar and different comprehensive histologic subtyping with respect to overall survival (61.3% versus 68.8%, p = 0.474).

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical results for SMPLC were compatible and acceptable with those for SPLC even with similar histologic subtyping, instead of T4 or M1 stages in the current TNM classification system. Preoperatively, tumor size was the only independent prognostic factor for SMPLC with surgical intervention.

The stage classification of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

The current Lung Cancer Stage Classification system is the seventh edition, which took effect in January 2010. This article reviews the definitions for the TNM descriptors and the stage grouping in this system.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Two synchronous non small cell lung carcinomas with different morphologies in the same lobe

We report the case of a sixty one year old female diagnosed with two synchronous primary lung cancers located within the same lobe. Surgical resection was performed, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient developed distant bone and skin metastases one year post-surgical resection. In this report we discuss the multimodality therapy used to treat this patient.

A case of resected synchronous multiple primary lung cancer comprising adenocarcinoma and carcinoid (cancer-in-cancer)

We performed surgical resection of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer, comprising adenocarcinoma and carcinoid components. The latter tumor was located within the central scar tissue formed by the adenocarcinoma (cancer-in-cancer). The patient was a 67-year-old Japanese woman who had a nodular lesion in the right S1 on chest computed tomography. Lung cancer was diagnosed intraoperatively by rapid needle aspiration cytology, and right upper lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection was performed. Histological examination of the resected specimen revealed cancer-in-cancer, consisting of adenocarcinoma and a carcinoid tumor. The carcinoid component was localized within the central fibrous scar of the dominant adenocarcinoma component.