Intrathoracic lymph node metastases from extrathoracic carcinoma: the place for surgery

Neglected lymph nodal metastases in patients with renal cancer: when to extend the anatomical template of lymph node dissection during nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still controversial. However, detecting lymph node invasion (LNI) is key due to prognostic implications and to identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapies such as adjuvant pembrolizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Out of 796 patients, 261 (33%) received eLND, of whom 62 (8%) for suspicious lymph node (LN) metastases at preoperative staging (cN1). eLND was divided in 3 anatomical areas: (1) hilar, (2) side-specific (pre-/para-aortic or pre-/para-caval) and (3) inter-aorto-caval nodes. Overall maximum LN diameter was measured by a dedicated radiologist for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression models (MVA) were tested for the effect of maximum LN diameter in predicting the presence of nodal metastases outside the anatomical area of cN1.

RESULTS

LNI was confirmed in 50% of cN1, whilst only 13 out of 199 cN0 patients were pN1 at final histology (6.5%; p < 0.001). In a per-patient analysis, of 62 cN1 patients, 24% vs. 18% vs. 8% harboured pN1 disease only inside vs. in-outside vs. only outside the suspicious anatomical field of cN1 at preoperative CT/MRI scan. At MVA, increasing diameter of suspicious LNs was independently associated with risk of finding positive LNs outside the suspicious anatomical field (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.11; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 50% of cN1 patients undergoing eLND will harbour LN metastases, also outside the suspicious radiological area, and maximum LNs diameter at preoperative imaging correlates with such risk. Thus, an eLND might be justified in patients with large suspicious LN metastases, to better stage this patient population and to improve postoperative treatment management.

Lymphatic Pathways of the Thorax: Predictable Patterns of Spread

OBJECTIVE. This article reviews thoracic lymphatic pathways and tributaries, discusses lymphatic anatomic variants and their clinical implications, and emphasizes common patterns of thoracic lymphadenopathy from extrapulmonary malignancies. CONCLUSION. Recognition of common patterns and pathways of thoracic lymphatic drainage can help identify the site of tumor origin and allow a more focused examination of disease extent, both of which are important for disease prognosis and management.

Mediastinal Metastasis of Breast Cancer Mimicking a Primary Mediastinal Tumor

Case series

Patients: Female, 48-year-old • Female, 47-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Metastatic breast cancer

Symptoms: Edema of left upper limb • no symptom

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Median sternotomy • small incisional biopsy

Specialty: Surgery

Thoracic Manifestations of Genitourinary Neoplasms and Treatment-related Complications

Genitourinary (GU) malignancies are a diverse group of common and uncommon neoplasms that may be associated with significant mortality. Metastases from GU neoplasms are frequently encountered in the chest, and virtually all thoracic structures can be involved. Although the most common imaging manifestations include hematogenous dissemination manifesting with peripheral predominant bilateral pulmonary nodules and lymphatic metastases manifesting with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, some GU malignancies exhibit unique features. We review the general patterns, pathways, and thoracic imaging features of renal, adrenal, urothelial, prostatic, and testicular metastatic neoplasms, as well as provide a discussion of treatment-related complications that might manifest in the chest. Detailed reporting of these patterns will allow the imager to assist the referring clinicians and surgeons in accurate determination of the stage, prognosis, and treatment options available for the patient. Awareness of specific treatment-related complications further allows the imager to enhance patient safety through accurate and timely reporting of potentially life-threatening consequences of therapies.

Clinical Implications of Noncoding Indels in the Surfactant-Encoding Genes in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer arises from the accumulation of genetic mutations, usually in exons. A recent study identified indel mutations in the noncoding region of surfactant-encoding genes in lung adenocarcinoma cases. In this study, we recruited 94 patients with 113 lung cancers (88 adenocarcinomas, 16 squamous cell carcinomas, and nine other histologies) who had undergone surgery in our department. A cancer panel was designed in-house for analyzing the noncoding regions, and targeted sequencing was performed. Indels in the noncoding region of surfactant-encoding genes were identified in 29/113 (25.7%) cases and represent the precise cell of origin for the lung cancer, irrespective of histological type and/or disease stage. In clinical practice, these indels may be used as clonal markers in patients with multiple cancers and to determine the origin of cancer of unknown primary site.

Lymphatic Drainage from Renal Tumors In Vivo: A Prospective Sentinel Node Study Using SPECT/CT Imaging

PURPOSE

Lymphatic drainage from renal tumors is unpredictable. In vivo drainage studies of primary lymphatic landing sites may reveal the variability and dynamics of lymphatic connections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the lymphatic drainage pattern of renal tumors in vivo with single photon emission/computerized tomography after intratumor radiotracer injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a phase II, prospective, single arm study to investigate the distribution of sentinel nodes from renal tumors on single photon emission/computerized tomography. Patients with cT1-3 (less than 10 cm) cN0M0 renal tumors of any subtype were enrolled in analysis. After intratumor ultrasound guided injection of 0.4 ml ^99mTc-nanocolloid we performed preoperative imaging of sentinel nodes with lymphoscintigraphy and single photon emission/computerized tomography. Sentinel and locoregional nonsentinel nodes were resected with a γ probe combined with a mobile γ camera. The primary study end point was the location of sentinel nodes outside the locoregional retroperitoneal templates on single photon emission/computerized tomography. Using a Simon minimax 2-stage design to detect a 25% extralocoregional retroperitoneal template location of sentinel nodes on imaging at α = 0.05 and 80% power at least 40 patients with sentinel node imaging on single photon emission/computerized tomography were needed.

RESULTS

Of the 68 patients 40 underwent preoperative single photon emission/computerized tomography of sentinel nodes and were included in primary end point analysis. Lymphatic drainage outside the locoregional retroperitoneal templates was observed in 14 patients (35%). Eight patients (20%) had supradiaphragmatic sentinel nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel nodes from renal tumors were mainly located in the respective locoregional retroperitoneal templates. Simultaneous sentinel nodes were located outside the suggested lymph node dissection templates, including supradiaphragmatic sentinel nodes in more than a third of the patients.

Pulmonary Manifestations of Solid Non-Pulmonary Malignancies

The lungs are a common site of metastatic disease. Pulmonary metastases develop due to local blood flow and cellular or biochemical properties of tumor cells. Metastases develop from any type of malignancy and may occur via hematogenous, lymphatic, aerogenous, and/or direct spread. Metastatic disease may present with symptoms indistinguishable from primary lung cancer, including dyspnea, hemoptysis, and chest pain. Radiographically, these may present as parenchymal lung disease, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, airway obstruction, or pleural and vascular disease. No part of the thorax is spared from metastatic potential. This review highlights complications of non-pulmonary solid malignancies based on sites of anatomic metastases.

The role of endobronchial ultrasonography for mediastinal lymphadenopathy in cases with extrathoracic malignancy

INTRODUCTION

Many extrathoracic malignancies can metastasize to lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes. Whether mediastinal lesions are metastasis in these patients changes staging, prognosis, and treatment strategy. In this study, we aimed to find out the contribution of EBUS-TBNA to the diagnosis in cases with extrathoracic malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had been previously diagnosed as extrapulmonary solid organ malignancy and in whom mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy developed during their follow-up and EBUS-TBNA was applied for diagnostic purposes were retrospectively included in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients consisting of 35 females (38.5 %) and 56 males (61.5 %) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 60.5 (±11.4). Malignancy was not observed in 54 (59.3 %) patients; primary malignancy metastasis was detected in 33 (36.3 %) patients, and primary lung cancer was detected in 4 (4.4 %) patients with EBUS-TBNA. The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in extrathoracic malignancies was determined as 90.2 %; its specificity was determined as 100 %, its negative predictive value as 92.5 %, its positive predictive value as 100 %, and its diagnostic accuracy as 95.6 %. The highest rate was determined in the left lower paratracheal lymph node when they were examined in terms of malignancy detection rate in lymph node stations.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA is a minimally invasive method with quite a low complication rate that does not require general anesthesia. It should be the first step method to be used in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathies seen in extrathoracic malignancies since it has high diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. EBUS-TBNA significantly reduces the need for surgical intervention. Further surgical interventions can be planned in patients in whom diagnostic competence is not ensured.

Negative Predictive Value of Granulomas on EBUS-TBNA in Suspected Extrathoracic Malignancy

PURPOSE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a well-established diagnostic tool for lung cancer, sarcoidosis, and suspected metastatic extrathoracic malignancy. EBUS-TBNA carries a high diagnostic yield, but its negative predictive value (NPV) requires further clarification.

METHODS

We reviewed EBUS-TBNA at our cancer center from 2008 to 2015. We identified negative diagnostic samples for adenopathy suspected to represent metastatic disease from extrathoracic malignancy.

RESULTS

We reviewed 529 EBUS-TBNAs. Ninety patients underwent EBUS-TBNA sampling of the hilum and/or mediastinum (121 nodes, 14 masses) for suspected extrathoracic malignancy. Thirty-seven patients had negative samples (lymph node, granulomas or non-diagnostic specimens). The overall NPV was 98 %. Granulomas (11 patients, 25 nodes) seen on histology had a 100 % NPV, including those that were FDG-PET (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) avid (n = 14 nodes).

CONCLUSION

Negative EBUS-TBNA in patients with extrathoracic malignancy and suspected secondary hilar or mediastinal metastases can infer a high NPV especially if granulomas are seen on histology. Larger prospective investigations are needed to confirm the high NPV of EBUS-TBNA with granulomas in extrathoracic malignancies.

[Metastatic thoracic lymph node carcinoma from extra-thoracic malignancy or from unknown primary site]

Malignant mediastinal lymph nodes without pulmonary disease may be lymphomatous or the metastases from thoracic or extrathoracic malignancy. More rarely, metastatic lymph nodes are without primary site. Surgery is generally diagnostic, restricted to confirming the metastatic process, because of too numerous and disseminated or unresectable lymph nodes. Radical surgery consisting in lymphadenectomy can be effective in case of mediastinal lymph node malignancy without other extra- and intrathoracic disease. We observed in our experience and in several case reports long-term good results in such cases. We suggest that including surgery in the multimodality treatment of mediastinal metastatic lymph nodes may be advisable in selected patients.

[Diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and extrathoracic malignancy]

INTRODUCTION

There is limited data about the diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and extrathoracic malignancy.

METHODS

From January 2007 to July 2011, EBUS-TBNA was performed in 68 patients with a history of extrathoracic malignancy (current or past) and suspected mediastinal lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients had a final diagnosis of cancer. In nineteen patients, the same histology was identified in the mediastinal nodes as in their prior extrathoracic cancer (colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer and lymphoma). In 12, the diagnosis was not "as expected" (ten lung cancers, one colorectal cancer, one unidentified cancer). Among 37 patients without diagnosis, biopsies in 27 showed normal lymphoid material, two had non-specific inflammation and eight had no contributory results. It was noted that procedures were reported to have been more difficult in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic performance of EBUS-TBNA in the context of extrathoracic malignancy is very variable depending on the origin of the cancer. Nevertheless, a diagnosis is concluded in almost 50% of the cases. These results underline the necessity to select carefully the indications of EBUS-TBNA in extrathoracic cancer.

Invasive staging of mediastinal lymph nodes: mediastinoscopy and remediastinoscopy

Nodal status in lung cancer is essential for planning therapy and assessing prognosis. The involvement of ipsilateral and contralateral mediastinal lymph nodes is associated with poor prognosis and usually excludes patients from upfront surgical treatment. Mediastinoscopy is a time-honored procedure that allows the surgeon to access the upper mediastinal lymph nodes for either biopsy or removal. Remediastinoscopy is mainly indicated to assess objective tumor response in mediastinal lymph nodes after induction therapy for locally advanced lung cancer and to indicate further therapy.

[Isolated malignant mediastinal lymphadenopathy]

Mediastinal adenopathies without pulmonary disease may be benign, lymphomatous or the metastases from intra- or extrathoracic malignancy or more rarely metastases with unknown primary site. We observed 507 patients with isolated mediastinal adenopathies: benign, lymphomatous and metastatic disease represented 41.4% (210/507), 26.8% (136/507), 31.8% (161/507) of them, respectively. Management of the latter was the most challenging. Surgery was generally diagnostic, restricted to confirming the metastatic process, because of too numerous and disseminated or unresectable lymph nodes in 84% of patients (135/161). However, radical surgery consisting in lymphadenectomy proved effective in case of mediastinal lymph node malignancy without other extra- and intrathoracic disease. We observed long-term good results in such cases, which also was demonstrated by case reports in the literature. We suggest that including surgery in the multimodality treatment of mediastinal metastatic lymph nodes may be advisable in selected patients.