Lung Transplantation and Donation After Cardiac Death: A Single Center Experience

Lung transplantation in primary pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary venous hypertension

OBJECTIVES

End-stage lung disease from primary pulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) and pulmonary venous-occlusive disease (PVOD) may require lung transplantation (LT). While medical therapies exist for the palliation of PPHTN, no therapies exist for PVOD. The study's objective is to compare outcomes of LT in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with PPHTN and PVOD who had undergone LT were identified in the UNOS database (2005-2022). Univariable analyses compared differences between groups in demographic, clinical, and post-transplant outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between the diagnosis group and survival. Overall survival time between groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Six hundred and ninety-six PPHTN and 78 PVOD patients underwent LT during the study period. Patients with PVOD had lower pulmonary artery mean pressure (47 vs. 53 mmHg, p < .001), but higher cardiac output (4.51 vs. 4.31 L/min, p = .04). PVOD patients were more likely to receive lungs from donation after cardiac death donors (7.7 vs. 2.9%, p = .04). There were no differences in postoperative complications or length of stay. PVOD was associated with superior survival at 30-day (100 vs. 93%, p = .02) and 90-day post-transplant (93 vs. 83%, p = .03), but not at later time points. In multivariable analyses, PVOD and brain death donor use were associated with better survival up to 90-day mark.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing LT for PVOD had better initial survival, which disappeared after 1 year of transplantation. Donation after circulatory death donor use had a short-term survival disadvantage.

The British Transplantation Society guidelines on cardiothoracic organ transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death

Maximising organ utilisation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors could help meet some of the shortfall in organ supply, but it represents a major challenge, particularly as organ donors and transplant recipients become older and more medically complex over time. Success is dependent upon establishing common practices and accepted protocols that allow the safe sharing of DCD organs and maximise the use of the DCD donor pool. The British Transplantation Society 'Guideline on transplantation from deceased donors after circulatory death' has recently been updated. This manuscript summarises the relevant recommendations from chapters specifically related to transplantation of cardiothoracic organs.

Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Organ Donation After Circulatory Death: Trends in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To summarize waitlist and transplant outcomes in kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation using organ donation after circulatory death (DCD).

BACKGROUND

DCD has expanded the donor pool for solid organ transplantation, most recently for heart transplantation.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult transplant candidates and recipients in the most recent allocation policy eras for kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation. Transplant candidates and recipients were grouped by acceptance criteria for DCD versus brain-dead donors [donation after brain death (DBD)] only and DCD versus DBD transplant, respectively. Propensity matching and competing-risks regression was used to model waitlist outcomes. Survival was modeled using propensity matching and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

DCD transplant volumes have increased significantly across all organs. Liver candidates listed for DCD organs were more likely to undergo transplantation compared with propensity-matched candidates listed for DBD only, and heart and liver transplant candidates listed for DCD were less likely to experience death or clinical deterioration requiring waitlist inactivation. Propensity-matched DCD recipients demonstrated an increased mortality risk up to 5 years after liver and kidney transplantation and up to 3 years after lung transplantation compared with DBD. There was no difference in 1-year mortality between DCD and DBD heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

DCD continues to expand access to transplantation and improves waitlist outcomes for liver and heart transplant candidates. Despite an increased risk for mortality with DCD kidney, liver, and lung transplantation, survival with DCD transplant remains acceptable.

Lung transplantation using allografts with more than 8 hours of ischemic time: A single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Six hours was historically regarded as the limit of acceptable ischemic time for lung allografts. However, broader sharing of donor lungs often necessitates use of allografts with ischemic time >6 hours. We characterized the association between ischemic time ≥8 hours and outcomes after lung transplantation using a contemporary cohort from a high-volume institution.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary isolated bilateral lung transplantation between 1/2016 and 5/2020 were included. Patients bridged to transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, and ex-vivo perfusion cases were excluded. Recipients were stratified by total allograft ischemic time <8 hours (standard) vs ≥8 hours (long). Perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of 358 patients, 95 (26.5%) received long ischemic time (≥8 hours) lungs. Long ischemic time recipients were more likely to be male and have donation after circulatory death donors than standard ischemic time recipients. On unadjusted analysis, long and standard ischemic time recipients had similar survival, and similar rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-transplant, acute rejection within 30 days, reintubation, and post-transplant length of stay. After adjustment, long and standard ischemic time recipients had comparable risks of mortality or graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In a modern cohort, use of lung allografts with "long" ischemic time ≥8 hours were associated with acceptable perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival. Further investigation is required to better understand how broader use impacts post-lung transplant outcomes and the implications for smarter sharing under an evolving national allocation policy.

Extended-criteria uncontrolled DCD donor for a fragile recipient: A case report about a challenging yet successful lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Lung donation after circulatory death (DCD) has proved to be an effective strategy for expanding the donor pool, but is still considered challenging. We report a successful case of lung procurement from an extended-criteria uncontrolled DCD.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We evaluated the lungs of an uncontrolled DCD from a hospital without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program. The donor was a non-smoker 20-year old male with a history of cardiomyopathy, cardiocirculatory arrests, and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Cardiac arrest occurred in a swimming pool, and bronchoscopy showed signs of inhalation. We employed our usual normothermic in-situ open-ventilated lung approach. After retrieval, lungs were stored on ice, then evaluated with ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) and judged suitable for transplantation. The recipient was a 26-year old female with cystic fibrosis on long-term oxygen therapy, on the waitlist for up to 21 months due to her anthropomorphic characteristics. She required central VA-ECMO support during bilateral lung transplantation. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within the first 72 h reached grade 3; post-operative peripheral VV-ECMO support was discontinued two days after surgery. The patient was discharged 28 days after surgery; she is alive two years after transplantation with no signs of rejection nor anastomotic complications.

DISCUSSION

Despite the spreading use of lungs from controlled DCD, perplexities remain on uncontrolled DCD, namely: severe PDG, postoperative mortality, airway complications.

CONCLUSION

Our case report suggests that good results can be achieved with uncontrolled DCD despite the presence of relative contraindications: inhalation of water, prolonged ischemic times and recipient in poor conditions.

Lung transplantation from donation after controlled cardiocirculatory death. Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The interest in donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) donors for lung transplantation (LT) has been recently rekindled due to lung allograft shortage. Clinical outcomes following DCD have proved satisfactory. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a thorough analysis of published experience regarding outcomes of LT after controlled DCD compared with donation after brain death (DBD) donors.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed and Web of Science using the items "lung transplantation" AND "donation after circulatory death" on November 1, 2018. The full text of relevant articles was evaluated by two authors independently. Quality assessment was performed using the NIH protocol for case-control and case series studies. A pooled Odds ratio (OR) and mean differences with inverse variance weighting using DerSimonian-Laird random effect models were computed to account for between-trial variance (τ2).

RESULTS

Of the 508 articles identified with our search, 9 regarding controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) were included in the systematic review, including 2973 patients (403 who received graft from DCD and 2570 who had DBD). Both 1-year survival and 2 and 3-grade primary graft dysfunction (PGD) were balanced between the two cohorts (OR = 1.00 and 1.03 respectively); OR for airway complications was 2.07 against cDCD. We also report an OR = 0.57 for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and an OR = 0.57 for 5-year survival against cDCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows no significant difference between recipients after cDCD or DBD regarding 1-year survival, PGD and 1-year freedom from CLAD. Airway complications and long-term survival were both related with transplantation after cDCD, but these statistical associations need further research.

Lung Transplantation with Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Donors

Purpose: Utilization of donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has the potential to decrease donor shortage in lung transplantation (LTx). This study reviews the long-term outcome of LTx from DCD donors.

Methods: We included all consecutive DCD (Maastricht Category III) and all donations after brain death (DBD) donor lung transplants at our Center performed between January 2012 and February 2017. Data were analyzed comparing the two groups in regard of survival after LTx as primary outcome.

Results: Median withdrawal to cardiac arrest time was 17 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.5–20.5). Median cardiac arrest to cold perfusion was 32 min (IQR: 24.5–36.5). Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at T72 occurred in three recipients. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) led to death in two cases. In DCD group, there was no 90-day mortality. In DCD, group 1- and 3-year survival rates were 100% and 80%. In DBD group, 1- and 3-year survival rates were 85% and 69% (p = 0.4).

Conclusions: Our report confirmed the comparable outcome from DCD donors compared with DBD donors. Utility of DCD donors is a safe option to overcome donor shortage.

Donors after cardiocirculatory death and lung transplantation

The number of patients actively awaiting lung transplantation (LTx) is more than the number of suitable donor lungs. The percentage of lung retrieval rate is lower when compared to other solid organs. The use of lungs from donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) donors is one of the options to avoid organ shortage in LTx. After extensive experimental research, clinical application of DCD donation is becoming wider. The results from most of the centers show at least equal survival rate compared to donors from brain death. This review paper will summarize experimental background and clinical experience from DCD donors.

Lung Donation After Controlled Circulatory Determination of Death: A Review of Current Practices and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Since the first reported series in 1995, transplantation of lungs recovered through donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) has steadily increased. In some European and Australian centers, controlled DCDD accounts for 15% to 30% of all transplanted lungs. Several transplant centers have reported early and midterm outcomes similar to those associated with the use of donors after brain death. Despite these encouraging reports, less than 2% of all lung transplants in the United States are performed using donors after circulatory determination of death.

METHODS

An electronic search from January 1990 to January 2014 was performed to identify series reporting lung transplant outcomes using controlled DCDD. Data from these publications were analyzed in terms of donor characteristics, donation after circulatory determination of death protocols, recipients' characteristics, and early and midterm outcomes.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-two DCDDs were transplanted into 225 recipients. The rate of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 ranged from 3% to 36%. The need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support after transplantation ranged from 0% to 18%. The average intensive care unit stay ranged from 4 to 8.5 days and the average hospital stay ranged from 14 to 35 days. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 0% to 11% and 1-year survival from 88% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Under clinical protocols developed and strictly applied by several experienced lung transplant programs, lungs from controlled DCDD have produced outcomes very similar to those observed with brain death donors.

Lung Quality and Utilization in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death Within the United States

Although controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) could increase the supply of donor lungs within the United States, the yield of lungs from cDCDD donors remains low compared with donation after neurologic determination of death (DNDD). To explore the reason for low lung yield from cDCDD donors, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient data were used to assess the impact of donor lung quality on cDCDD lung utilization by fitting a logistic regression model. The relationship between center volume and cDCDD use was assessed, and the distance between center and donor hospital was calculated by cDCDD status. Recipient survival was compared using a multivariable Cox regression model. Lung utilization was 2.1% for cDCDD donors and 21.4% for DNDD donors. Being a cDCDD donor decreased lung donation (adjusted odds ratio 0.101, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.085-0.120). A minority of centers have performed cDCDD transplant, with higher volume centers generally performing more cDCDD transplants. There was no difference in center-to-donor distance or recipient survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.78-1.37) between cDCDD and DNDD transplants. cDCDD lungs are underutilized compared with DNDD lungs after adjusting for lung quality. Increasing transplant center expertise and commitment to cDCDD lung procurement is needed to improve utilization.

Expanding the donor pool: donation after cardiac death

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment of patients with end-stage lung disease. Availability of donor lungs remains the primary limitation and leads to substantial wait-list mortality. Efforts to expand the donor pool have included a resurgence of interest in the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) lungs. Unique in its physiology, lung viability seems more tolerant to the variable durations of ischemia that occur in DCD donors. Initial experience with DCD LTx is promising and, in combination with ex vivo lung perfusion systems, seems a valuable opportunity to expand the lung donor pool.

Long-term results after lung transplantation using organs from circulatory death donors: a propensity score-matched analysis†

OBJECTIVES

Due to organ shortage in lung transplantation (LTx), donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been implemented in several countries, contributing to an increasing number of organs transplanted. We sought to assess long-term outcomes after LTx with organs procured following circulatory death in comparison with those obtained from donors after brain death (DBD).

METHODS

Between January 2007 and November 2013, 302 LTxs were performed in our institution, whereby 60 (19.9%) organs were retrieved from DCD donors. We performed propensity score matching (DCD:DBD = 1:2) based on preoperative donor and recipient factors that were significantly different in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of demographics and preoperative donor and recipient characteristics. There were no significant differences regarding intraoperative variables and total ischaemic time. Patients from the DCD group had significantly higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at the end of the procedure (P = 0.014), and significantly lower pO2/FiO2 ratio during the first 24 h after the procedure (P = 0.018). There was a trend towards higher incidence of the need for postoperative extracorporeal life support in the DCD group. Other postoperative characteristics were comparable. While the overall cumulative survival was not significantly different, the DCD group had significantly poorer results in terms of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)-free survival in the long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results after LTx with organs procured following DCD are in general comparable with those obtained after DBD LTx. However, patients transplanted using organs from DCD donors have a predisposition for development of BOS in the longer follow-up.

Lung transplantation from donation after cardiocirculatory death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LTx) can extend life expectancy and enhance the quality of life for select patients with end-stage lung disease. In the setting of donor lung shortage and waiting list mortality, the interest in donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) is increasing. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes between DCD and conventional donation after brain death (DBD).

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We identified original research studies with 1-year post-transplant survival data involving >5 DCD transplants. We performed meta-analyses examining 1-year survival, primary graft dysfunction, and acute rejection after LTx.

RESULTS

We identified 519 citations; 11 observational cohort studies met our inclusion criteria for systematic review, and 6 met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. There were no differences found in 1-year mortality after LTx between DCD and DBD cohorts in individual studies or in the meta-analysis (DCD [n = 271] vs DBD [n = 2,369], relative risk [RR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.31, p = 0.52, I(2) = 0%). There was also no difference between DCD and DBD in a pooled analysis of 5 studies reporting on primary graft dysfunction (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68-1.73, p = 0.7, I(2) = 0%) and 4 studies reporting on acute rejection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49-1.05, p = 0.09, I(2) = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after LTx from DCD is comparable to survival after LTx from DBD in observational cohort studies. DCD appears to be a safe and effective method to expand the donor pool.

Lung transplantation from donors after circulatory death using portable ex vivo lung perfusion

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death is a novel method of increasing the number of donor lungs available for transplantation. Using organs from donors after circulatory death has the potential to increase the number of transplants performed.

METHODS

Three bilateral lung transplants from donors after circulatory death were performed over a six-month period. Following organ retrieval, all sets of lungs were placed on a portable ex vivo lung perfusion device for evaluation and preservation.

RESULTS

Lung function remained stable during portable ex vivo perfusion, with improvement in partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios. Mechanical ventilation was discontinued within 48 h for each recipient and no patient stayed in the intensive care unit longer than eight days. There was no postgraft dysfunction at 72 h in two of the three recipients. Ninety-day mortality for all recipients was 0% and all maintain excellent forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity values post-transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The authors report excellent results with their initial experience using donors after circulatory death after portable ex vivo lung perfusion. It is hoped this will allow for the most efficient use of available donor lungs, leading to more transplants and fewer deaths for potential recipients on wait lists.

Ischemic injury of the liver in a porcine model of cardiac death assessed by in vivo microdialysis

This study aims to evaluate the ischemic injury of the liver in a porcine model of cardiac death assessed by in vivo microdialysis. A porcine model of cardiac death was established by the suffocation method. Metabolic indicators were monitored using the microdialysis technique during warm ischemia time (WIT) and cold ischemia time (CIT). Pathological changes in ischemic-injured livers were observed by haematoxylin-eosin staining. The predictive values of biochemical parameters regarding the liver donor were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA). The degree of warm ischemic injury of the livers increased with prolonged WIT. Serum glucose, glycerol, pyruvate, lactic acid levels and lactate-to-pyruvate (L/P) ratio increased gradually during WIT. Results from Pearson correlation analyses indicated that serum lactate level and L/P ratio were positively associated with the degree of warm ischemic injury of the livers. The degree of cold ischemic injury of the livers gradually increased after 12 h CIT. Serum glucose, lactic acid and L/P ratio achieved a peak after 6-8 h of CIT, but gradually decreased with prolonged CIT. The peak of glycerol occurred after 8 h of CIT, while no changes were found with prolonged CIT. Serum pyruvate level exhibited an increasing trend after 12 h CIT. Our results confirmed that serum glucose and lactate levels were negatively correlated with cold ischemic injury of the liver. However, serum glycerol and pyruvate levels showed positive correlations with cold ischemic injury of the liver. The liver donor was unavailable after 30 min WIT and 24 h CIT. The cut-off value of serum lactate level for warm ischemic injury of the livers was 2.374 with a sensitivity (Sen) of 90 % and specificity (Spe) of 95 %; while the L/P radio was 0.026 (Sen = 80 %, Spe = 83 %). In addition, the cut-off values of serum glucose, lactate, glycerol and pyruvate levels for cold ischemic injury of the livers were 0.339 (Sen = 100 %, Spe = 77 %), 1.172 (Sen = 100 %, Spe = 61 %), 56.359 (Sen = 100 %, Spe = 65 %) and 0.020 (Sen = 100 %, Spe = 67 %), respectively. Our findings provide empirical evidences that serum glucose, lactate levels and L/P ratio may be good indicators for the degree of warm ischemic injury of the livers after cardiac death; while serum glucose, lactate, glycerol and pyruvate levels may be important in predicting cold ischemic injury.

Lung donor selection criteria

The criteria that define acceptable physiologic and social parameters for lung donation have remained constant since their empiric determination in the 1980s. These criteria include a donor age between 25-40, a arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FiO2 ratio greater than 350, no smoking history, a clear chest X-ray, clean bronchoscopy, and a minimal ischemic time. Due to the paucity of organ donors, and the increasing number of patients requiring lung transplant, finding a donor that meets all of these criteria is quite rare. As such, many transplants have been performed where the donor does not meet these stringent criteria. Over the last decade, numerous reports have been published examining the effects of individual acceptance criteria on lung transplant survival and graft function. These studies suggest that there is little impact of the historical criteria on either short or long term outcomes. For age, donors should be within 18 to 64 years old. Gender may relay benefit to all female recipients especially in male to female transplants, although results are mixed in these studies. Race matched donor/recipients have improved outcomes and African American donors convey worse prognosis. Smoking donors may decrease recipient survival post transplant, but provide a life saving opportunity for recipients that may otherwise remain on the transplant waiting list. No specific gram stain or bronchoscopic findings are reflected in recipient outcomes. Chest radiographs are a poor indicator of lung donor function and should not adversely affect organ usage aside for concerns over malignancy. Ischemic time greater than six hours has no documented adverse effects on recipient mortality and should not limit donor retrieval distances. Brain dead donors and deceased donors have equivalent prognosis. Initial PaO2/FiO2 ratios less than 300 should not dissuade donor organ usage, although recruitment techniques should be implemented with intent to transplant.

Ex vivo lung perfusion

Lung transplantation (LTx) is an established treatment option for eligible patients with end-stage lung disease. Nevertheless, the imbalance between suitable donor lungs available and the increasing number of patients considered for LTx reflects in considerable waitlist mortality. Among potential alternatives to address this issue, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has emerged as a modern preservation technique that allows for more accurate lung assessment and also improvement of lung function. Its application in high-risk donor lungs has been successful and resulted in safe expansion of the donor pool. This article will: (I) review the technical details of EVLP; (II) the rationale behind the method; (III) report the worldwide clinical experience with the EVLP, including the Toronto technique and others; (IV) finally, discuss the growing literature on EVLP application for donation after cardiac death (DCD) lungs.

Should we reconsider lung transplantation through uncontrolled donation after circulatory death?

Lung transplantation through controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has slowly gained universal acceptance with reports of equivalent outcomes to those through donation after brain death. In contrast, uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) lung use is controversial and requires ethical, legal and medical complexities to be addressed in a limited time. Consequently, uDCD lung use has not previously been reported in the United States. Despite these potential barriers, we present a case of a patient with multiple gunshot wounds to the head and the body who was unsuccessfully resuscitated and ultimately became an uDCD donor. A cytomegalovirus positive recipient who had previously consented for CDC high-risk, DCD and participation in the NOVEL trial was transplanted from this uDCD donor, following 3 h of ex vivo lung perfusion. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the recipient was discharged home on day 9. While this case represents a "best-case scenario," it illustrates a method for potential expansion of the lung allograft pool through uDCD after unsuccessful resuscitation in hospitalized patients.

Retrograde flush is more protective than heparin in the uncontrolled donation after circulatory death lung donor

BACKGROUND

Formation of microthrombi after circulatory arrest is a concern for the development of reperfusion injury in lung recipients from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. In this isolated lung reperfusion study, we compared the effect of postmortem heparinization with preharvest retrograde pulmonary flush or both.

METHODS

Domestic pigs (n = 6/group) were sacrificed by ventricular fibrillation and left at room temperature for 1 h. This was followed by 2.5 h of topical cooling. In control group [C], no heparin and no pulmonary flush were administered. In group [R], lungs were flushed with Perfadex in a retrograde way before explantation. In group [H], heparin (300 IU/kg) was administered 10 min after cardiac arrest followed by closed chest massage for 2 min. In the combined group, animals were heparinized and the lungs were explanted after retrograde flush [HR]. The left lung was assessed for 60 min in an ex vivo reperfusion model.

RESULTS

Pulmonary vascular resistance at 50 and 55 min was significantly lower in [R] and [HR] groups compared with [C] and [H] groups (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001) and at 60 min in [R], [H], and [HR] groups compared with [C] group (P < 0.001). Oxygenation, compliance, and plateau airway pressure were more stable in [R] and [HR] groups. Plateau airway pressure was significantly lower in [R] group compared with the [H] group at 60 min (P < 0.05). No significant differences in wet-dry weight ratio were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that preharvest retrograde flush is more protective than postmortem heparinization to prevent reperfusion injury in lungs recovered from donation after circulatory death donors.

Advances in lung preservation

After a brief review of conventional lung preservation, this article discusses the rationale behind ex vivo lung perfusion and how it has shifted the paradigm of organ preservation from conventional static cold ischemia to the utilization of functional normothermia, restoring the lung's own metabolism and its reparative processes. Technical aspects and previous clinical experience as well as opportunities to address specific donor organ injuries in a personalized medicine approach are also reviewed.

Protective effect of plasmin in marginal donor lungs in an ex vivo lung perfusion model

BACKGROUND

Donor lung thrombi are considered an important etiology for primary graft dysfunction in lung transplantation. We hypothesized that thrombolysis before lung transplantation could alleviate ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of the fibrinolytic agent plasmin on lungs damaged by thrombi in an ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) system.

METHODS

Rats were divided into control, non-plasmin, and plasmin groups (n = 7 each). In the control and plasmin groups, cardiac arrest was induced by withdrawal of mechanical ventilation without heparinization. Ventilation was restarted 150 minutes after cardiac arrest. The lungs were flushed, and the heart and lungs were excised en bloc. The lungs were perfused in the EVLP system for 60 minutes, and plasmin or placebo was administered upon EVLP initiation.

RESULTS

Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products in the perfusate were significantly higher in the plasmin group than in the control and non-control groups (p < 0.001 for both). Plasmin administration significantly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (plasmin vs non-plasmin, p = 0.011) and inhibited the exacerbation of dynamic compliance (plasmin vs non-plasmin, p = 0.003). Lung weight gain was less in the plasmin group than in the non-plasmin group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed that plasmin administration in an EVLP model dissolved thrombi in the lungs, resulting in reconditioning of the lungs as assessed by various physiologic parameters.

Excellent clinical outcomes from a national donation-after-determination-of-cardiac-death lung transplant collaborative

Donation-after-Determination-of-Cardiac-Death (DDCD) donor lungs can potentially increase the pool of lungs available for Lung Transplantation (LTx). This paper presents the 5-year results for Maastricht category III DDCD LTx undertaken by the multicenter Australian National DDCD LTx Collaborative. The Collaborative was developed to facilitate interaction with the Australian Organ Donation Authority, standardization of definitions, guidelines, education and audit processes. Between 2006 and 2011 there were 174 actual DDCD category III donors (with an additional 37 potentially suitable donors who did not arrest in the mandated 90 min postwithdrawal window), of whom 71 donated lungs for 70 bilateral LTx and two single LTx. In 2010 this equated to an "extra" 28% of donors utilized for LTx. Withdrawal to pulmonary arterial flush was a mean of 35.2 ± 4.0 min (range 18-89). At 24 h, the incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was 8.5%[median PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio 315 (range 50-507)]. Overall the incidence of grade 3 chronic rejections was 5%. One- and 5-year actuarial survival was 97% and 90%, versus 90% and 61%, respectively, for 503 contemporaneous brain-dead donor lung transplants. Category III DDCD LTx therefore provides a significant, practical, additional quality source of transplantable lungs.

Experience with the first 50 ex vivo lung perfusions in clinical transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion is a novel method to evaluate and improve the function of injured donor lungs. We reviewed our experience with 50 consecutive transplants after ex vivo lung perfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective study using prospectively collected data was performed. High-risk brain death donor lungs (defined as Pao(2)/Fio(2) <300 mm Hg or lungs with radiographic or clinical findings of pulmonary edema) and lungs from cardiac death donors were subjected to 4 to 6 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion. Lungs that achieved stable airway and vascular pressures and Pao(2)/Fio(2) greater than 400 mm Hg during ex vivo lung perfusion were transplanted. The primary end point was the incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours after transplantation. End points were compared with lung transplants not treated with ex vivo lung perfusion (controls).

RESULTS

A total of 317 lung transplants were performed during the study period (39 months). Fifty-eight ex vivo lung perfusion procedures were performed, resulting in 50 transplants (86% use). Of these, 22 were from cardiac death donors and 28 were from brain death donors. The mean donor Pao(2)/Fio(2) was 334 mm Hg in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 452 mm Hg in the control group (P = .0001). The incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours was 2% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 8.5% in the control group (P = .14). One patient (2%) in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 7 patients (2.7%) in the control group required extracorporeal lung support for primary graft dysfunction (P = 1.00). The median time to extubation, intensive care unit stay, and hospital length of stay were 2, 4, and 20 days, respectively, in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 2, 4, and 23 days, respectively, in the control group (P > .05). Thirty-day mortality (4% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 3.5% in the control group, P = 1.00) and 1-year survival (87% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group and 86% in the control group, P = 1.00) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation of high-risk donor lungs after 4 to 6 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion is safe, and outcomes are similar to those of conventional transplants. Ex vivo lung perfusion improved our center use of donor lungs, accounting for 20% of our current lung transplant activity.

Reconditioning of lungs donated after circulatory death with normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion

BACKGROUND

The use of donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) donors for lung transplantation has come into practice. In this study we investigated whether DCD lungs can be resuscitated after warm ischemia with normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP).

METHODS

Four hours after cardiac arrest, beagle dogs were divided into two groups (n = 6 each): those with static cold storage (SCS group) and those with normothermic EVLP (EVLP group), for 3.5 hours. Physiologic lung functions were evaluated during EVLP. In both groups, the left lungs were then transplanted and reperfused for 4 hours to evaluate post-transplant lung functions. Lung tissue adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels were measured at given time-points.

RESULTS

Lung oxygenation was significantly improved with EVLP (p < 0.01), and lung oxygenation at the end of EVLP significantly reflected post-transplant lung oxygenation (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). Post-transplant lung oxygenation was significantly better in the EVLP group than in the SCS group (p < 0.05). Both dynamic pulmonary compliance and wet-to-dry lung weight ratio 4 hours after transplantation were also significantly better in the EVLP group than in the SCS group (p < 0.05). Microthrombi in the donor lungs before transplantation were microscopically detected more often in the SCS group. The lung tissue ATP levels 4 hours after transplantation were significantly higher in the EVLP group compared with the SCS group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion could resuscitate DCD lungs injured by warm ischemia, and may ameliorate ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Lungs from donation after circulatory death donors: an alternative source to brain-dead donors? Midterm results at a single institution

OBJECTIVES

Donor organ shortage remains to be the major limitation in lung transplantation, and donation after circulatory death (DCD) might represent one way to alleviate this problem. DCD was introduced to our institution in 2007 and has been a part of our clinical routine since then. Here, we present the mid-term results of lung transplantation from DCD in a single institution and compare the outcomes with the lung recipient cohort receiving lungs from donation after brain death (DBD).

METHODS

Since initiation of the DCD programme in March 2007, of the 157 lung transplantations performed, 26 (16.5%) were retrieved from DCD donors, with 25 double- and 1 single-lung transplants being performed. Results were compared with standard DBD transplantations. Analyses included, amongst others, donor characteristics, survival, prevalence of primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection, lung function tests during follow-up, onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) as well as duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay.

RESULTS

While there was no significant difference between lung function, BOS and survival between the two groups, lungs from DCD donors had a higher PaO(2) (median; interquartile range) 498.3 (451.5; 525) vs. DBD 442.5 (371.25; 502) kPa before retrieval (P = 0.009). There was also a longer total ischaemic time in the DCD vs. DBD group: 320 min (298.75; 393.25) vs. 285.5 min (240; 373) (P = 0.025). All other parameters were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Medium-term results after lung transplantation with organs procured after circulatory death are comparable with those obtained after standard lung transplantation. Therefore, DCD could be used to significantly increase the donor pool.

Current status of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment option for selected patients with end-stage lung disease, leading to improved survival and improved quality of life. The last 20 years have seen a steady growth in number of lung transplantation procedures performed worldwide. The increase in clinical activity has been associated with tremendous progress in the understanding of cellular and molecular processes that limit both short- and long-term outcomes. This review gives a comprehensive overview of the current status of lung transplantation for the referring physician. It demonstrates that careful selection of potential recipients, optimisation of their condition prior to transplant, use of carefully assessed donor organs, excellent surgery and meticulous long-term follow-up are all essential ingredients in determining a successful outcome.

Donation after circulatory death

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) describes the retrieval of organs for the purposes of transplantation that follows death confirmed using circulatory criteria. The persisting shortfall in the availability of organs for transplantation has prompted many countries to re-introduce DCD schemes not only for kidney retrieval but increasingly for other organs with a lower tolerance for warm ischaemia such as the liver, pancreas, and lungs. DCD contrasts in many important respects to the current standard model for deceased donation, namely donation after brain death. The challenge in the practice of DCD includes how to identify patients as suitable potential DCD donors, how to support and maintain the trust of bereaved families, and how to manage the consequences of warm ischaemia in a fashion that is professionally, ethically, and legally acceptable. Many of the concerns about the practice of both controlled and uncontrolled DCD are being addressed by increasing professional consensus on the ethical and legal justification for many of the interventions necessary to facilitate DCD. In some countries, DCD after the withdrawal of active treatment accounts for a substantial proportion of deceased organ donors overall. Where this occurs, there is an increased acceptance that organ and tissue donation should be considered a routine part of end-of-life care in both intensive care unit and emergency department.

Donation after cardiac death lung transplantation outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation is now a well established treatment option for several end-stage respiratory diseases. Survival after lung transplantation has significantly improved over the last decade. The primary limitation to increased utilization of lung transplantation remains donor scarcity. Suitable allografts have been procured from donors after determination of neurologic death and from donors after determination of cardiac death (DDCD or DCD). Historically, the first human lung transplantation performed, utilized an allograft procured after cardiovascular death, also referred to as nonheart-beating donor.The experience at University of Wisconsin in 1993 reintroduced DCD lung transplantation with the first successful clinical case.

RECENT FINDINGS

A potential additional lung allograft source, DCD lung transplantation has been established with very acceptable outcomes observed by several centers. We provide the relevant background for the rationale of donor allograft expansion to include DCD lungs from controlled (Maastricht category III donors).

SUMMARY

This review considers the available evidence for DCD lung transplantation and compares reported primary graft dysfunction rates and current survival data available.

Hypothermic machine perfusion ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat lungs from non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND

The use of non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) has come into practice to resolve the shortage of donor lungs. This study investigated whether hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) can improve the quality of NHBD lungs.

METHODS

An uncontrolled NHBD model was achieved in male Lewis rats. Ninety minutes after cardiac arrest, HMP was performed for 60 min at 6°C to 10°C. The first study investigated the physiological lung functions during HMP and the lung tissue energy levels before and after HMP. The second study divided the rats into three groups (n=6 each): no ischemia group; 90-min warm ischemia+60-min HMP+120-min static cold storage (SCS) (HMP group); and 90-min warm ischemia+180-min SCS group. All lungs were reperfused for 60 min at 37°C. Lung functions were evaluated at given timings throughout the experiments. Oxidative damage during reperfusion was evaluated immunohistochemically with a monoclonal antibody against 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine.

RESULTS

The first study revealed that lung functions were stable during HMP. Lung tissue energy levels decreased during warm ischemia but were significantly increased by HMP (P<0.05). The second study confirmed that HMP significantly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance, increased pulmonary compliance, and improved pulmonary oxygenation. The ratio of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine positive cells to total cells significantly increased in the SCS group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term HMP improved lung tissue energy levels that decreased during warm ischemia and ameliorated ischemia-reperfusion injury with decreased production of reactive oxygen species.

Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion in clinical lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

More than 80% of donor lungs are potentially injured and therefore not considered suitable for transplantation. With the use of normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), the retrieved donor lung can be perfused in an ex vivo circuit, providing an opportunity to reassess its function before transplantation. In this study, we examined the feasibility of transplanting high-risk donor lungs that have undergone EVLP.

METHODS

In this prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial, we subjected lungs considered to be high risk for transplantation to 4 hours of EVLP. High-risk donor lungs were defined by specific criteria, including pulmonary edema and a ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PO(2):FIO(2)) less than 300 mm Hg. Lungs with acceptable function were subsequently transplanted. Lungs that were transplanted without EVLP during the same period were used as controls. The primary end point was primary graft dysfunction 72 hours after transplantation. Secondary end points were 30-day mortality, bronchial complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital.

RESULTS

During the study period, 136 lungs were transplanted. Lungs from 23 donors met the inclusion criteria for EVLP; in 20 of these lungs, physiological function remained stable during EVLP and the median PO(2):FIO(2) ratio increased from 335 mm Hg in the donor lung to 414 and 443 mm Hg at 1 hour and 4 hours of perfusion, respectively (P<0.001). These 20 lungs were transplanted; the other 116 lungs constituted the control group. The incidence of primary graft dysfunction 72 hours after transplantation was 15% in the EVLP group and 30% in the control group (P=0.11). No significant differences were observed for any secondary end points, and no severe adverse events were directly attributable to EVLP.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation of high-risk donor lungs that were physiologically stable during 4 hours of ex vivo perfusion led to results similar to those obtained with conventionally selected lungs. (Funded by Vitrolife; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01190059.).

Novel approaches to expanding the lung donor pool: donation after cardiac death and ex vivo conditioning

Two novel approaches have been developed to potentially increase the availability of donor lungs for lung transplantation. In the first approach, lungs from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are used to increase the quantity of organ donors. In the second approach, a newly developed normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) technique is used as a means of reassessing the adequacy of lung function from DCD and from high-risk brain death donors prior to transplantation. This EVLP technique can also act as a platform for the delivery of novel therapies to repair injured organs ex vivo.