Efficacy and Safety of Very Low-Dose Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement

Oral anticoagulant management of patients with mechanical heart valves at the Salam Centre of Khartoum: Observations on quality of anticoagulation and thrombotic risk

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatic heart disease with mechanical heart valve (MHV) replacement is common in Africa. However, MHV requires long-life anticoagulation and managing this can be challenging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report data of a prospective observational study conducted between August 2018 and September 2019 in MHV patients in the Salam Centre for Cardiac Surgery built in Khartoum, by Emergency, an Italian Non-Governmental Organization, to evaluate the quality of anticoagulation control and the risk of thrombotic complications.

RESULTS

We studied 3647 patients (median age 25.1 years; 53.9 % female). Median Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) was 53 % (interquartile range 37 % to 67 %) and 70 thrombotic events (rate 1.8 × 100 pt-years [95 % CI 1.38-2.23]) were recorded. Among patients in the first quartile of TTR (≤37 %), we recorded 34/70 (48.6 %) of all thrombotic events (rate 3.7 × 100 pt-years [95 % CI 2.5-5.1]), with a high mortality rate (2.2 × 100 pt-years [95 % CI 1.3-3.3]). In patients with guideline-recommended TTR (≥65 %) the event rate was 0.8 × 100 pt-years for thrombotic events [95 % CI 0.3-1.5] and 0.4 × 100 pt-years for mortality [95 % CI 0.1-0.9]. Multivariable analysis showed that having a TTR in the lowest quartile (≤37 %) and being noncompliant are significantly associated with increased thrombotic risk. Aspirin use or different valve type did not influence the thrombotic risk. Almost 40 % of all thromboembolic complications could have been potentially prevented by further improving VKA management to obtain a TTR > 37 %.

CONCLUSION

The thrombotic risk of MHV patients on VKAs living in a low-income country like Sudan is associated with low quality of anticoagulation control. Efforts should be made to decrease the number of non-compliant patients and to reach a guideline-recommended TTR of ≥65 %.

Treatment of valvular heart disease in young patients-"early evidence" versus "latest fashion"

Is the performance of locally manufactured mechanical valve prostheses relevant for modern cardiac surgery, in which mechanical valve replacement has become a rarity? This question comes to mind reading the article in this issue of the Journal demonstrating equal outcomes of the TTK Chitra tilting disk mechanical heart valve prostheses in comparison to the SJM bi-leaflet blockbuster. The evidence documenting efficacy of mechanical valve replacement stems from the early ages of cardiac surgery, but often demonstrates superior outcomes in terms of survival and hemodynamics. Yet, the latest fashion in the Western world consists biological choices in combination with new transcatheter techniques (valve in valve options) or the Ozaki or Ross procedures. As long-term results are often missing and documented advantages for mechanical valves stems from early evidence, the local emphasis of mechanical valve replacement may possibly result in superior individual prognoses compared to following the Western world's latest fashions. Individual patient information and decision making moves into focus.

Self-management of patients with heart valve replacement and its clinical outcomes: a systematic review

Introduction

For patients with heart valve replacement, self-management can play an essential role in the management of their condition.

Aim

This review aimed to identify the aspects of self-management and its clinical outcomes in patients with heart valve replacement.

Material and methods

In this systematic review, the peer-reviewed research literature on self-management of patients with heart valve replacement was assessed. Since May 2020, the PubMed, Scopus, and web of science databases were searched regardless of time and language limitations. The eligibility of the articles was assessed by title or abstract according to the search strategy. Article selection was applied regarding to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Also, article screening was conducted by 2 independent authors.

Results

Twenty-five studies were considered in this systematic review. For inclusion, the self-management of patients had to have prerequisites, appropriate training, and be applicable in the aspects of anticoagulation therapy self-management, international normalized ratio (INR) self-testing, low-dose INR self-management, and heart valve function self-monitoring. In this method, through proper management of INR levels and anticoagulation therapy, the complications rate could be reduced and the patients would be able to diagnose functional disorders in the early stages by monitoring the valve function. This procedure was able to prevent the progression of complications.

Conclusions

Self-management is an applicable protocol in the field of anticoagulation therapy, INR control, low-dose INR management, and the monitoring of cardiac valve function. This protocol could improve the quality of treatment for these patients through upgrading the care standards.

Outcomes related to anticoagulation management for mechanical valve replacements

Background

This study evaluates anticoagulation management and its impact on longitudinal clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement.

Methods

Patients undergoing mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) or aortic valve replacement (AVR) from 2010–2018 at a single center were included. Patients were stratified into therapeutic and non-therapeutic anticoagulation groups based on the median percentage of international normalized ratio (INR) values within the reference range (2.0–3.0 for AVR, 2.5–3.5 for MVR) during the first post-operative year. Using Cox regression analysis, comorbidity-adjusted survival and freedom from adverse events were compared.

Results

Six hundred and fifty-one patients underwent mechanical valve replacement (166 MVR, 485 AVR). Comorbidity-adjusted survival was similar in the MVR and AVR cohorts (P=0.23). There was a median of 27 [interquartile range (IQR): 14–42] INRs drawn per patient in the first post-operative year. The median percentage of INRs within the reference values during the first post-operative year was 42.85% (IQR: 30.77–53.95%), with the majority of non-therapeutic INRs being subtherapeutic (34.51%; n=6,864). There were no significant differences in adjusted survival between the therapeutic and non-therapeutic groups [hazard ratio (HR): 1.12, P=0.73]. Within the first post-operative year, there were no significant differences in stroke, major bleeding, peripheral non-stroke arterial thromboembolism, and readmission for intravenous heparin in the therapeutic and non-therapeutic groups.

Conclusions

Taking into account relevant comorbidities and valve type, patients with a larger proportion of non-therapeutic INRs during the first post-operative year demonstrated no difference in longitudinal clinical outcomes. Further research into more standardized INR monitoring and potentially expanded INR target ranges for patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement is warranted.

Strategic ventilation reduces non-ventilated contralateral lung injury induced by one-lung ventilation in rabbits

ABSTRACT One lung ventilation (OLV) often results in trauma to the unventilated contralateral lung. This study aims to evaluate the effects of different OLV regimens on the injury of the unventilated contralateral lung to identify the best conditions for OLV. Forty rabbits were divided into five groups: a sham group, OLV group I (fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) 1.0, tidal volume (VT) 8mL/kg, respiratory rate (R) 40 breaths/min and inspiratory/expiratory ratio (I:E) 1:2), OLV group II (FIO2=1.0, VT 8mL/kg, R 40 breaths/min, I:E 1:2, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O), OLV group III (FIO2 1.0, VT 6mL/kg, R 40 breaths/min, I:E 1:2 and PEEP 5 cm H2O) and OLV group IV (FIO2 0.8, VT 6mL/kg, R 40 breaths/min, I:E 1:2 and PEEP 5 cm H2O). Animals from all OLV groups received two-lung ventilation (TLV) to establish a baseline, followed by one of the indicated OLV regimens. The rabbits in the sham group were intubated through trachea and ventilated with fresh air. Arterial blood gas samples were collected, lung injury parameters were evaluated, and the concentrations of TNF-α and IL-8 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and pulmonary surfactant protein A (SPA) in the unventilated lung were also measured. In OLV group I, the unventilated left lung had higher TNF-α, IL-8 and lung injury score but lower SPA than the ventilated right lung. In OLV groups I to III, the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-8 and lung injury score in the left lung decreased but SPA increased. No differences in these parameters between OLV groups III and IV were observed. Strategic ventilation designed for OLV groups III and IV reduced OLV-induced injury of the non-ventilated contralateral lung in rabbits.

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with prosthetic heart valves

BACKGROUND

The choice of antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulants or antiplatelets, after prosthetic heart valve replacement or repair, remains a disputed topic in the literature. Antithrombotic therapies are used after heart valve intervention to reduce the rates of thromboembolic events, therefore improving patient outcomes. Different interventions may require different therapeutic regimens to achieve the most efficacious clinical outcome for patients.

METHODS AND DISCUSSION

This review aims to summarize and critique the available literature concerning therapeutic agents used for bioprosthetic and mechanical valves as well as for valve repair, so as to assist clinicians and researchers in making decisions with regard to their patients and research endeavors.

Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Strategies After On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

The burden oral anticoagulation is a limitation of mechanical valve prostheses.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to test whether patients could be safely managed with dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg) or lower warfarin after On-X mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR).

METHODS

PROACT (Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Trial) (n = 576) is a multicenter (41 sites) noninferiority trial. From June 2006 through February 2014, 201 patients ≥18 years of age without thromboembolic risk factors undergoing mAVR were randomized to receive DAPT (n = 99) or standard warfarin plus aspirin (n = 102) 3 months after mAVR (low-risk arm). From June 2006 through October 2009, 375 patients with 1 or more thromboembolic risk factors were also randomized to lower intensity warfarin plus aspirin (international normalized ratio 1.5 to 2.0; n = 185) or standard warfarin plus aspirin (international normalized ratio 2.0 to 3.0; n = 190) 3 months after mAVR (high-risk arm).

RESULTS

The low-risk arm was terminated for excess cerebral thromboembolic events (3.12% per patient-year vs. 0.29% per patient-year, p = 0.02) in the DAPT group at up to 8.8-year follow-up (631.6 patient-years), with no differences in bleeding or all-cause mortality. High-risk arm patients experienced significantly lower major (1.59% per patient-year vs. 3.94% per patient-year, p = 0.002) and minor (1.27% per patient-year vs. 3.49% per patient-year, p = 0.002) bleeding up to 8.7-year follow-up (2,035.2 patient-years), with no differences in thromboembolism (0.42% per patient-year vs. 0.09% per patient-year, p = 0.20) and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

DAPT was associated with higher rates of thromboembolism and valve thrombosis compared with control in the low-risk arm. International normalized ratios were safely maintained at 1.5 to 2.0 in high-risk patients, without differences in mortality or thromboembolic complications. (Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Trial [PROACT]; NCT00291525).

Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce regarding the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) in Thai patients who require warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify the optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement in Thai patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study design. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of mechanical mitral valve replacement patients who received warfarin therapy at Siriraj Hospital. INR range was classified into 6 groups (< 2, 2.0-2.4, 2.5-2.9, 3.0-3.4, 3.5-4.5, and > 4.5). The optimal INR level was defined as the level with the lowest incidence density of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included and followed over a period of 707.81 patient-years. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.53 ± 1.27 years. Eleven patients experienced 13 thromboembolic events (3.42 per 100 patient-years), and 12 patients experienced 18 total bleeding events (5.50 per 100 patient-years). Intracranial bleeding occurred in 3 patients (2.62 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient time spent within INR 2.5-3.4, INR < 2.5, and INR > 3.4 was 41.96, 54.04, and 4%, respectively. The overall event rate was lowest in the 2.0 to 3.4 INR range. Statistically significant differences were observed between INR 2.3 to 4 and < 2 (p < 0.001) and between INR 2.3 to 4 and > 3.4 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal INR level was within the range of 2.0 to 3.4 in our cohort of Thai mechanical mitral valve replacement patients.

The Prospective Randomized On-X Valve Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT): Lower is better, but is it good enough?

Due to their durability, mechanical prostheses are frequently used for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in young adults. However, these valves are thrombogenic and require lifelong anticoagulation. Over the last few decades, efforts have been made towards the lowering of INR targets in an effort to reduce bleeding events without influencing the thromboembolic risk. The Prospective Randomized On-X Valve Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT) was designed to compare standard versus low anticoagulation targets in high-risk patients undergoing mechanical AVR with the ON-X prosthesis.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy

BACKGROUND

Clinicians confront numerous practical issues in optimizing the use of anticoagulants to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions about the use of anticoagulants in the management of VTE. These guidelines assume the choice of anticoagulant has already been made.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 25 recommendations and 2 good practice statements to optimize management of patients receiving anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations included using patient self-management of international normalized ratio (INR) with home point-of-care INR monitoring for vitamin K antagonist therapy and against using periprocedural low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging therapy. Conditional recommendations included basing treatment dosing of LMWH on actual body weight, not using anti-factor Xa monitoring to guide LMWH dosing, using specialized anticoagulation management services, and resuming anticoagulation after episodes of life-threatening bleeding.

Late clinical outcomes after mechanical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: old versus new prostheses

Background

The study aimed to evaluate the late clinical outcomes of new-generation mechanical valves for severe aortic stenosis (AS) compared with old mechanical valves.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from 254 patients with severe AS, who underwent primary mechanical aortic valve replacement from 1995 to 2013. Patients were classified into two groups: old-valve group (n=65: 33 ATS standard, 32 Medtronic-Hall) and new-valve group (n=189: 113 St. Jude Regent, 46 On-X, 30 Sorin Overline). Median patient age was 58 years (Q1-Q3: 52-61). With propensity score matching based on demographic information, 56 patients in the old-valve group were matched with 177 patients in the new-valve group. The median follow-up duration was 91 months (Q1-Q3: 48-138).

Results

Cardiac-related mortality and hemorrhagic events were significantly lower in the new-valve group (P=0.047 and P=0.032, respectively). The median international normalized ratio (INR) at follow-up was significantly higher in the old-valve group [2.23, Q1-Q3: 2.14-2.35 (old-valve group); 2.08, Q1-Q3: 1.92-2.23 (new-valve group), P<0.001]. The incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was significantly higher in the old-valve group (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis of the total population revealed that PPM was a significant risk factor for cardiac-related events [hazard ratio (HR) =5.279, 95% CI, 1.886-14.561, P=0.002] and showed higher trend of increasing mortality (HR =3.082, P=0.076).

Conclusions

New mechanical prostheses showed a better hemodynamic performance and lower incidence of PPM. Anticoagulation strategy to lower the target INR in patients with new mechanical valves may improve late outcomes by reducing hemorrhagic events.

Incidence and risk factors for thromboembolism and major bleeding in patients with mechanical valve prosthesis: A nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

Risk factors of stroke/thromboembolism (TE) and major bleeding, and incidence of these events in specific age categories in warfarin-treated patients with mechanical heart valves (MHV) are uncertain. Our objective was to calculate event rates in specific age categories and identify risk factors for adverse events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 4,810 treatment periods with MHV between January 2006 and December 2011 in the Auricula and Swedish Web system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies registries. There were 3,751 treatment periods with aortic valve replacements (AVR) and 866 with mitral valve replacements (MVR). Median follow-up time was 4.5 years (IQR, 1.5-6.0). Time in therapeutic range with warfarin for patients with AVR was 74.2% for international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0, with 72% of the patients having this target range. Rate of stroke/TE for AVR and MVR was 1.3 and 1.6 per 100 patient years, respectively (P=.20). The rate of first major bleeding was 2.6 and 3.9 per 100 patient years with AVR and MVR, respectively (P<.001). By multivariate analysis for AVR, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.03 per year) and previous stroke (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.5) emerged as independent risk factors for stroke/TE. Heart failure (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.4) and atrial fibrillation (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.4) were not associated to stroke/TE. For major bleeding events, age (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03 per year) and previous major bleeding (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.9-3.3) emerged as independent risk factors for AVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide cohort study with MHV and high time in therapeutic range, heart failure and atrial fibrillation did not appear as risk factors of stroke/TE.

Anticoagulation for prosthetic heart valves: unresolved questions requiring answers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The efficacy of anticoagulation for valvular prostheses is the result of a delicate balance between the risk of thromboembolic (TE) events and bleeding. Here, we review data on anticoagulation for valve prostheses with a focus on clinical trials that address key unanswered questions.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are several unanswered questions in the field of prosthetic valve anticoagulation, including: optimal TE prophylaxis in the short term for bioprostheses, optimal TE prophylaxis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the safety and efficacy of lower levels of anticoagulation with the bileaflet mechanical prosthesis, the role of aspirin for patients with mechanical prostheses, and the management of anticoagulation for mechanical valves in pregnancy. Other areas of study include the role, if any, of nonwarfarin oral anticoagulants for prosthetic TE prophylaxis as well as self-INR monitoring. Finally, we briefly mention studies of newer anticoagulants, such as novel vitamin K antagonists and antisense oligonucleotides, that are on the horizon.

SUMMARY

Optimal antithrombotic management is a key issue for patients with valvular prostheses, and the publication of recent trials has provided much-needed guidance. We highlight areas of progress, in addition to the major unanswered questions for which well-designed, prospective clinical trials are forthcoming.

Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of point-of-care devices for the management of patients on oral anticoagulation allows self-testing by the patient at home. Patients who self-test can either adjust their medication according to a pre-determined dose-INR (international normalized ratio) schedule (self-management), or they can call a clinic to be told the appropriate dose adjustment (self-monitoring). Increasing evidence suggests self-testing of oral anticoagulant therapy is equal to or better than standard monitoring. This is an updated version of the original review published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects on thrombotic events, major haemorrhages, and all-cause mortality of self-monitoring or self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy compared to standard monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update, we re-ran the searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), 2015, Issue 6, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to June week 4 2015), Embase (Ovid, 1980 to 2015 week 27) on 1 July 2015. We checked bibliographies and contacted manufacturers and authors of relevant studies. We did not apply any language restrictions .

SELECTION CRITERIA

Outcomes analysed were thromboembolic events, mortality, major haemorrhage, minor haemorrhage, tests in therapeutic range, frequency of testing, and feasibility of self-monitoring and self-management.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently extracted data and we used a fixed-effect model with the Mantzel-Haenzel method to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and Peto's method to verify the results for uncommon outcomes. We examined heterogeneity amongst studies with the Chi(2) and I(2) statistics and used GRADE methodology to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 28 randomised trials including 8950 participants (newly incorporated in this update: 10 trials including 4227 participants). The overall quality of the evidence was generally low to moderate. Pooled estimates showed a reduction in thromboembolic events (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75; participants = 7594; studies = 18; moderate quality of evidence). Both, trials of self-management or self-monitoring showed reductions in thromboembolic events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.70; participants = 3497; studies = 11) and (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.97; participants = 4097; studies = 7), respectively; the quality of evidence for both interventions was moderate. No reduction in all-cause mortality was found (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; participants = 6358; studies = 11; moderate quality of evidence). While self-management caused a reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.84; participants = 3058; studies = 8); self-monitoring did not (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15; participants = 3300; studies = 3); the quality of evidence for both interventions was moderate. In 20 trials (8018 participants) self-monitoring or self-management did not reduce major haemorrhage (RR 0.95, 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.12; moderate quality of evidence). There was no significant difference found for minor haemorrhage (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.41; participants = 5365; studies = 13). The quality of evidence was graded as low because of serious risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 82%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Participants who self-monitor or self-manage can improve the quality of their oral anticoagulation therapy. Thromboembolic events were reduced, for both those self-monitoring or self-managing oral anticoagulation therapy. A reduction in all-cause mortality was observed in trials of self-management but not in self-monitoring, with no effects on major haemorrhage.

Self-Management of Anticoagulant Therapy in Mechanical Heart Valve Patients: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patient-self-management (PSM) of oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists for mechanical heart valves has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials. However, the effectiveness of PSM in clinical practice has only been investigated in small trials. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of PSM of oral anticoagulant therapy in mechanical heart valve patients.

METHODS

We conducted a matched cohort study: cases were patients with a mechanical heart valve performing PSM affiliated with Aarhus University Hospital or Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, in the period 1996 to 2012 (n = 615). Prospectively registered patient data were obtained from databases at two hospitals, and cross linkage between these databases and national patient registries provided detailed information on comorbidities and events. Control patients were matched (on sex, date of birth, year of first valve surgery, and grouped valve position) in a ratio of 5:1 (n = 3,075) with patients receiving conventional management who were randomly selected within the match group. The effectiveness and safety was estimated using major bleeding and thromboembolic events and death as outcomes.

RESULTS

We observed low event rates in the PSM group. After 5 years, PSM was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with conventional management (adjusted hazard ratio of 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 0.71). The hazard ratios for thromboembolism and major bleeding were 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.24) and 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.56 to 1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to superior clinical effectiveness, self-managed oral anticoagulant therapy may potentially improve the standard of care for patients with mechanical heart valves.

Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a bioprosthesis remains controversial for patients aged 50-65 years. This cohort study reports the very long-term outcomes of AVR using Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in this age group.

METHODS

From 1984 to 2008, 522 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial aortic bioprostheses were implanted in 516 patients aged 50-65 years (mean age, 60 ± 4 years; 19% female). Multiple valve replacements were excluded fro m our cohort. Baseline demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were recorded prospectively. Mean follow-up was 9 ± 6 years, for a total of 4428 valve-years. Follow-up was complete for 97% of patients included.

RESULTS

Operative mortality rate was 2%. One hundred and forty-six late deaths occurred for a linearized rate of 3%/valve-year. Actuarial survival rates averaged 73 ± 2, 59 ± 3 and 35 ± 5% after 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. Mortality rate associated with reoperation was 2%. Actuarial freedom from reoperation rates due to structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 10, 15 and 20 years was respectively of 91 ± 2, 76 ± 3 and 50 ± 6%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated an actual risk of explantation secondary to SVD at 20 years of 30 ± 3%. Expected valve durability was 19 years for this age group. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD in this middle-aged population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients aged 50-65 years undergoing AVR with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis, the expected valve durability was 19 years. Age was not a significant risk factor for SVD within this age group. Patient selection and attention to timing of reintervention may be determinants of long-term outcomes.

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing cardiac or thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Cardiac and thoracic surgery are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing these types of surgery is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of primary thromboprophylaxis on the incidence of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding in patients undergoing cardiac or thoracic surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched May 2014) and CENTRAL (2014, Issue 4). The authors searched the reference lists of relevant studies, conference proceedings, and clinical trial registries.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing any oral or parenteral anticoagulant or mechanical intervention to no intervention or placebo, or comparing two different anticoagulants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data on methodological quality, participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes including symptomatic VTE and major bleeding as the primary effectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 12 RCTs and one quasi-RCT (6923 participants), six for cardiac surgery (3359 participants) and seven for thoracic surgery (3564 participants). No study evaluated fondaparinux, the new oral direct thrombin, direct factor Xa inhibitors, or caval filters. All studies had major study design flaws and most lacked a placebo or no treatment control group. We typically graded the quality of the overall body of evidence for the various outcomes and comparisons as low, due to imprecise estimates of effect and risk of bias. We could not pool data because of the different comparisons and the lack of data. In cardiac surgery, 71 symptomatic VTEs occurred in 3040 participants from four studies. In a study of 2551 participants, representing 85% of the review population in cardiac surgery, the combination of unfractionated heparin with pneumatic compression stockings was associated with a 61% reduction of symptomatic VTE compared to unfractionated heparin alone (1.5% versus 4.0%; risk ratio (RR) 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.64). Major bleeding was only reported in one study, which found a higher incidence with vitamin K antagonists compared to platelet inhibitors (11.3% versus 1.6%, RR 7.06; 95% CI 1.64 to 30.40). In thoracic surgery, 15 symptomatic VTEs occurred in 2890 participants from six studies. In the largest study evaluating unfractionated heparin versus an inactive control the rates of symptomatic VTE were 0.7% versus 0%, respectively, giving a RR of 6.71 (95% CI 0.40 to 112.65). There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in the risk of major bleeding from two studies evaluating fixed-dose versus weight-adjusted low molecular weight heparin (2.7% versus 8.1%, RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.07 to 1.60) and unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin (6% and 4%, RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.26 to 8.60).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in cardiac and thoracic surgery is limited. Data for important outcomes such as pulmonary embolism or major bleeding were often lacking. Given the uncertainties around the benefit-to-risk balance, no conclusions can be drawn and a case-by-case risk evaluation of VTE and bleeding remains preferable.

The effects of a low international normalized ratio on thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical mitral valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Mechanical heart valve replacement has an inherent risk of thromboembolic events (TEs). Current guidelines recommend an international normalized ratio (INR) of at least 2.5 after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a low INR (2.0-2.5) on thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical MVR on warfarin therapy.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent mechanical MVR were enrolled in this study. The end points of this study were defined as TEs (valve thrombosis, transient ischemic attack, stroke) and bleeding (all minor and major bleeding) complications. Patients were followed up for a mean of 39.6 months and the mean INR of the patients was calculated. After data collection, patients were divided into 3 groups according to their mean INR, as follows: group 1 (n = 34), INR <2.0; group 2 (n = 49), INR 2.0-2.5; and group 3 (n = 52), INR >2.5.

RESULTS

A total of 22 events (10 [7.4%] thromboembolic and 12 [8.8%] bleeding events) occurred in the follow-up period. The mean INR was an independent risk factor for the development of TEs. Mean INR and neurological dysfunction were independent risk factors for the development of bleeding events. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the log mean INR and all bleeding events, and a negative correlation was found between the log mean INR and all TEs. The total number of events was significantly lower in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that a target INRs of 2.0-2.5 are acceptable for preventing TEs and safe in terms of bleeding complications in patients with mechanical MVR.

Acute thrombosis of mechanical bi-leaflet aortic valve prosthesis

Thrombosis of mechanical aortic valve prosthesis is a rare but life-threatening complication. In most reported cases, inadequate anticoagulation or cessation of anticoagulation is the cause of prosthesis thrombosis. The case of a 70-year-old male patient hospitalized for severe dyspnoea is presented. Although the patient was under continuous anticoagulation, thrombosis of the 16 years previously implanted mechanical 31-sized aortic valve prosthesis was diagnosed. Emergency surgery was performed and postoperative course was uneventful. Patients with large size prostheses should have closer anticoagulation monitoring, even after many years of event-free postimplant course.

Low-intensity international normalized ratio (INR) oral anticoagulant therapy in Chinese patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses

The purpose of this study was to define the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy in Chinese patients with valve replacement surgery. We studied 1,658 patients who underwent mechanical valve replacement in Beijing Anzhen Hospital; the focus of the study was on correlation between intensity of anticoagulant therapy and thromboembolism/hemorrhage complications. We further followed up 1,508 patients for 46 ± 16 months (range 1-61 months). Average INR was 2.13 ± 0.56, and warfarin dose was 3.09 ± 0.85 mg/day. The incidence rate of anticoagulation-related thromboembolism was 1.17 per 100 patient-years (%/pt-y), and the incidence rate of anticoagulation-related hemorrhage was 2.02%/pt-y. The incidence rate of total complications (i.e., combined thromboembolism and hemorrhages) was 3.24%/pt-y. The rate of total complications in group on INR 1.3-2.3 (aortic valve replacement: 1.3-1.8; mitral valve replacement and double valve replacement: 1.8-2.3) was the lowest among all anticoagulant therapy regimens followed. In conclusion, the relatively low anticoagulant strategy presented above efficiently prevents thrombosis and hemorrhage complications.

Long-term self-management of anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement in outside trial conditions

In this investigation, we hypothesize that quality of oral anticoagulation (OA) and long-term outcome after mechanical heart valve (MHV) replacement with self-management (Self-M) of OA is superior to conventional anticoagulation treatment (Conv-T), even in outside trial conditions. One hundred sixty patients (78.8% aortic valve replacements) were trained in international normalized ratio Self-M and 260 patients (86.2% aortic valve replacements) preferred Conv-T. Mean follow-up was 8.6 ± 2.1 years, representing 3612 patient-years. During follow-up, 37.2% bleedings and 10.6% thromboembolic events were recorded in the Self-M group versus 39.6% bleedings (P = 0.213) and 15.4% thromboembolic events (P = 0.064) in the Conv-T group. Serious adverse events were significantly lower in the Self-M group [grade III bleeding events causing disability or death: 0 versus 4.6% (P = 0.03); grade III thromboembolic events: 0.6 versus 5.0% (P = 0.011)]. Patients with Self-M were significantly more satisfied with their OA management and their quality of life (P < 0.001). Actuarial survival after 1, 5 and 10 years was 100, 99 and 97 with Self-M and 100, 95 and 81% with Conv-T, respectively (P < 0.001). Univariate risk factors for mortality were age (P = 0.008), type of operation (P = 0.021) and conventional OA (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only conventional OA reached significance (P < 0.001). We conclude that in a routine setting under outside trial conditions Self-M of OA improves long-term outcome and treatment quality.