Long-term survival of patients with pN2 lung cancer according to the pattern of lymphatic spread

Effect of Surgical Treatment for N2-Positive c-stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma in the "PACIFIC" Era

BACKGROUND

The PACIFIC trial findings drastically changed the c-stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment strategy. However, it remains uncertain whether surgery is no longer needed for treatment. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery and explore the prognostic factors of better outcomes in surgery-treated patients than in PACIFIC regimen-treated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, 107 patients with clinical N2-stage III NSCLC underwent lung resection in our institute. We analyzed and compared the yearly postoperative overall survival (OS) benchmarks of these patients to those of patients treated in the PACIFIC trial.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS rates of patients were 87.7%, 73.9%, 64.9%, 58.2%, and 55.4%, respectively, all of which were superior to those of PACIFIC regimen-treated patients. However, patients with cT3/T4 tumors and skip, multistation, distant, and bulky N2 metastases, as well as those who underwent bronchoplasty, showed inferior results in several yearly benchmarks than in PACIFIC regimen-treated patients. Multivariate analyses conducted among factors mentioned above showed that cT3/T4 tumor was a worse prognostic factor for surgery-treated patients than for PACIFIC regimen-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, P = .036). Distant N2 metastasis was also a worse prognostic factor, although its effect was not statistically significant (HR 1.81, P = .082).

CONCLUSION

Surgery remains the mainstay of N2-positive c-stage III NSCLC treatment, and the PACIFIC regimen may be suitable only for patients with unresectable disease. However, surgery should be cautiously considered for patients with cT3/4 disease.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With N1 Involvement or Skip Metastases Presents the Same Survival Outcome: Results From a Multicentric Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic difference among patients affected by NSCLC with hilar metastases only or mediastinal nodes metastases without hilar involvement (skip metastases) is still unclear. Aim of this study is to analyse if prognostic difference are present or if the two groups present the same survival outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on NSCLC patients from 7 high volume centres (2004-2014) were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Histology different from adenocarcinoma(ADC) or squamous cell carcinoma(SCC), patients without data on lymphadenectomy, who underwent neoadjuvant treatment, with distant metastases or incomplete resection were excluded, selecting patients with hilar involvement or with skip metastases. Different prognostic factors such as Tstage, histology, pathological stage, nodal characteristics and adjuvant therapy administration were correlated to overall survival (OS) by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. The log-rank test was used to assess differences between subgroups. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression to compare the prognostic power of different factors.

RESULTS

The final analysis was conducted on 480 adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma patients. Five-year OS (5YOS) resulted 53.9%. No significant differences in OS were detected comparing pN1 vs. pN2 patients or stage IIB vs. stage IIIA-B patients. Univariable confirmed as favourable prognostic factors young age (P<.001), T1-2 tumors (P=.030), number of resected nodes≥10 (P=.040), lymph node ratio (P=.026). Multivariable analysis confirmed as independent negative prognostic factors T≥3 (HR:1.385, 95%CI:1.037-1.851, P=.027) and age≥68 years (HR1.637, 95%CI:1.245-2.152).

CONCLUSION

Patients with N1 involvement or skip metastases present a similar prognosis, suggesting that N2 involvement in these cases may be related to a direct lymphatic drainage to the mediastinal stations.

Impact of skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis on outcomes after resection for primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and nodal disease are a heterogeneous group with varied patterns of disease. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of patients with skip N2 disease in comparison to those with N1 or non-skip N2 disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 445 patients undergoing anatomical lung resection for primary lung cancer between 2012 and 2019 with post-operative histological confirmation of nodal disease was undertaken. Log rank analysis was used to assess differences in estimated median overall survival according to nodal status. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether skip N2 disease was independently associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 67.0 years (standard deviation ± 9.2 years) and 48.1% (n = 214) were male. In total, 20.7% (n = 92) of patients had N1 disease, 32.1% (n = 143) had skip N2 disease and 47.2% (n = 210) had non-skip N2 disease. Post-operative upstaging took place in 33.0% (n = 147) of patients. Median follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile range 14-68 months). Skip N2 patients had significantly longer estimated median overall survival in comparison to their non-skip N2 counterparts (47 months vs 28 months, log rank analysis p = 0.029) and non-skip N2 disease remained independently associated with reduced overall survival after multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.421, 95% confidence interval 1.060-1.907, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Skip N2 disease is a positive prognostic factor for patients with N2 lung cancer, suggesting that lung cancer staging guidelines should consider separating N2 disease into additional subgroups in order to improve prognostic accuracy.

True Prevalence of Unforeseen N2 Disease in NSCLC: A Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis

Patients with unforeseen N2 (uN2) disease are traditionally considered to have an unfavorable prognosis. As preoperative and intraoperative mediastinal staging improved over time, the prevalence of uN2 changed. In this review, the current evidence on uN2 disease and its prevalence will be evaluated. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies or completed, published trials that included uN2 disease until 6 April 2023, without language restrictions. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to score the included papers. A total of 512 articles were initially identified, of which a total of 22 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Despite adequate mediastinal staging, the pooled prevalence of true unforeseen pN2 (9387 patients) was 7.97% (95% CI 6.67-9.27%), with a pooled OS after five years (892 patients) of 44% (95% CI 31-58%). Substantial heterogeneity regarding the characteristics of uN2 disease limited our meta-analysis considerably. However, it seems patients with uN2 disease represent a subcategory with a similar prognosis to stage IIb if complete surgical resection can be achieved, and the contribution of adjuvant therapy is to be further explored.

Reaching multidisciplinary consensus on the management of non-bulky/non-infiltrative stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management of patients with non-bulky/non-infiltrative stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. In this modified Delphi study from France, we aimed to generate agreement through multidisciplinary decision-making on the clinical management of patients with non-bulky/non-infiltrative N2 NSCLC.

METHODS

An expert panel of 30 physicians from different specialities completed two Delphi rounds of a 76-item questionnaire, pertaining to: pathological confirmation of N2 disease; initial treatment approach; treatment approach in case of disease progression/stability following neoadjuvant chemotherapy; treatment approach taking into account various patient and tumour characteristics. Each questionnaire item was scored using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus in agreement was achieved if ≥ 80 % of responses to a questionnaire item were scored between 7 and 9 and if the median value of the score to the item was ≥ 7.

RESULTS

Regarding the pathologic confirmation of N2 disease, agreement (up to 100 %) was reached on endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound as the preferred method of initial mediastinal staging for paratracheal lymph nodes. There was also panellist agreement (up to 93 %) on the adoption as first-line treatment of surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with single-station disease, and of concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant immunotherapy in those with multi-station N2 disease. Panellists further agreed on the use of a non-surgical strategy, i.e., concurrent chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant immunotherapy, in patients with single-station N2 disease in case of: involvement of ≥ 2 mediastinal lymph nodes; disease progression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy; compromised cardiopulmonary function if compatible with radiotherapy; anticipated right pneumonectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study reinforces the importance of multidisciplinary discussions leading to the best individual approach to the clinical management of patients with non-bulky/non-infiltrative N2 NSCLC, a challenging heterogeneous population.

Extracapsular extension of pN2 lymph node metastases is not prognostically significant in surgically resected patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the pathologic lymph node status N2 is a heterogeneous entity, with different degrees of lymph node involvement representing different prognoses. It is speculated whether extra capsular nodal extension may help to define a subgroup with implications on long-term survival.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 118 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65 men, 53 women), who were treated between 2013 and 2018 and found to have pathologic N2 lymph node involvement. In all patients lung resection with systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection was performed with curative intent. In N2 lymph node metastases capsules of affected lymph nodes were examined microscopically as to whether extracapsular extension was present.

Results

51 patients (43 %) had extracapsular extension (ENE). Most of these patients (n=35) only had ENE in a single lymph node (69 %). The overall 5-year survival rate was 24.6 % and progression-free survival rate 17.8 %. In the multivariate analysis OS was worse for patients with multiple affected pN2 stations, concurrent N1 metastases, increasing age, and larger tumor size. For the percentage of lymph nodes affected with ENE (of total examined) only a non-significant trend towards worse OS could be observed (p=0.06).

Conclusions

Although we could not demonstrate significant prognostic differences between N2 extra capsular nodal involvement within our patient population, other analyses may yield different results. However, clinicians should continue performing thorough lymph nodes dissections in order to achieve local complete resection even in patients with extra capsular tumor spread.

The postoperative prognosis of skip-N2 metastasis is favorable in small-cell lung carcinoma patients with pathological N2 classification: a propensity-score-adjusted retrospective multicenter study

Background

The study on skip-N2 metastasis in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of skip-N2 metastasis based on a multicenter cohort.

Methods

We collected 176 SCLC patients with pathological categories T1-4N1-2M0 from four hospitals in China. Survival curves were drawn through the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The Cox regression method was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval of the characteristics for cancer-specific survival (CSS). Two propensity-score methods were used to reduce the bias, including the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity-score matching (PSM).

Results

This multicenter database included 64 pN1 patients, 63 non-skip-N2 cases, and 49 skip-N2 cases. Skip-N2 and the non-skip-N2 patients had gap CSS rates (skip-N2 no versus yes: 41.0% versus 62.0% for 1-year CSS, 32.0% versus 46.0% for 2-year CSS, and 20.0% versus 32.0% for 3-year CSS). After PSM, there were 32 pairs of patients to compare survival differences between N2 and skip-N2 diseases, and 34 pairs of patients to compare prognostic gaps between N1 and skip-N2 diseases, respectively. The results of IPTW and PSM both suggested that skip-N2 cases had better survival outcomes than the non-skip-N2 cases (IPTW-adjusted HR = 0.578; PSM-adjusted HR = 0.510; all log-rank p < 0.05). Besides, the above two analytic methods showed no difference in prognoses between pN1 and skip-N2 diseases (all log-rank p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Skip-N2 patients were confirmed to have a better prognosis than non-skip-N2 patients. Besides, there was no survival difference between pN1 and skip-N2 cases. Therefore, we propose that the next tumor-node-metastasis staging system needs to consider the situation of skip metastasis with lymph nodes in SCLC.

[Review for N2 Sub-staging in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were heterogeneous groups and required further stratification. The International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) divided N2 into three sub-stages: N2 at a single station without N1 involvement (N2a1), N2 at a single station with N1 involvement (N2a2), and N2 at multiple stations (N2b). These new descriptors significantly distinguished the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern of patients with different N2 sub-stages. The OS and DFS of N2a1 were not sufficiently distinguished from N1 at multiple stations (N1b). The OS and DFS of N2a2 were intermediate between those of N2a1 and N2b. Current evidence did not support the further subdivision of the N2b. The main recurrence pattern of N2a1, N2a2 and N2b were distant metastasis, and the risks of distant metastasis increased successively. N2a1 patients were at low risk of locoregional recurrence, which could not be reduced by postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). N2a2 and N2b patients had a similar higher risk of locoregional recurrence, which could be reduced to a similar level of N2a1 patients by PORT.
.

Diversity of lymphatic flow in patients with lung cancer revealed by computed tomography lymphography

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to verify the optimal extent of lymph node dissection or sampling during lung cancer surgery based on the sentinel node (SN) map created by computed tomography (CT) lymphography.

METHODS

From April 2010 to January 2015, patients with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, who were candidates for lobectomy or segmentectomy with standard hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection, and in whom bronchus reached the tumour, were enrolled. An ultrathin bronchoscope was inserted to the target bronchus under the guidance of virtual bronchoscopic navigation images. CT images of the chest were obtained 30 s after 2.5 ml of iopamidol was injected. SNs were identified when the maximum CT attenuation value of the lymph nodes on postcontrast CT images increased by 30 Hounsfield units or more compared with the precontrast images. Patients underwent lobectomy with standard lymph node dissection.

RESULTS

SNs were identified in 36 (87.8%) of the 41 patients. The average number of SNs was 1.6 (range, 1-4). There was 1 false negative case; therefore, the accuracy of SN identification was 97.2% (35/36). In 5 (13.9%) of 36 patients, SNs were outside the lobe-specific lymph node station range (#11i from right S1, #7 from right S1, #4R from right S8, #12u from right S8, #7 and #12l from left S1 + 2).

CONCLUSIONS

CT lymphography demonstrated the diversity of lymphatic spreading patterns and there were cases in which lymph flows are found outside the lymph node dissection range.

Spanish Lung Cancer Group SCAT trial: surgical audit to lymph node assessment based on IASLC recommendations

Background

The Spanish Customized Adjuvant Therapy (SCAT) trial assessed the role of individualized adjuvant therapy in clinical N0 incidental pN1 and/or N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) completely resected. We assessed surgical topics with an in-depth analysis of quality of lymphadenectomy based on International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendations.

Methods

Patients with information about lymphadenectomy available were included (N=451). Prospectively collected data about tumor, type of resection, and postoperative morbidity and quality of lymph node dissection (LND) were retrospectively evaluated. Role of lymph node assessment on survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, using regression models to identify prognostic factors.

Results

In 33.7%, 17.7% and 49.9% of cases, regions 7, 10 and 11 respectively were not assessed. In 21.1% of patients, less than three lymph node regions were biopsied, while in 19.6% of patients less than six lymph nodes were assessed. In 53,4% of patients only one N1 region was evaluated. From patients with positive N2, 8.9% had no N1 regions biopsied. Twenty-nine percent of patients with at least one N2 lymph node resected shown the highest region involved. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was unknown. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 61.7% (95% CI: 55.4-67.4%), 51.5% (95% CI: 39.2-62.4%) and 42.3% (95% CI: 32.1-52.2%) for patients with N1, N2 and N1+N2 disease, respectively (P<0.01). Both number of lymph nodes resected and number of lymph nodes involved by tumor were significantly related to prognosis.

Conclusions

IASLC recommendations for surgical resections were not followed in a high proportion of surgical procedures. Hilar and mediastinal lymph node assessment and involvement showed to impact prognosis. Surgical issues such as postoperative mortality could not be evaluated owing to trial design.

Survival Analysis in Single N2 Station Lung Adenocarcinoma: The Prognostic Role of Involved Lymph Nodes and Adjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors in patients with single mediastinal station (sN2) involvement continues to be a debated issue.

METHODS

Data on 213 adenocarcinoma patients with sN2 involvement and who had undergone complete anatomical lung resection and lymphadenectomy, were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and pathological characteristics together with adjuvant therapy (AD) and node (N) status classifications (number of resected nodes (#RN), number of metastatic nodes (#MN), and node ratio (#MN/#RN = NR) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Univariable analysis confirmed that age (0.009), #MN (0.009), NR (0.003), #N1 involved stations (p = 0.003), and skip metastases (p = 0.005) were related to overall survival (OS). Multivariable analysis confirmed, as independent prognostic factors, age <66 years and NR with a three-year OS (3YOS) of 78.7% in NR < 10% vs. 46.6% in NR > 10%. In skip metastases, NR (HR 2.734, 95% CI 1.417-5.277, p = 0.003) and pT stage (HR2.136, 95% CI 1.001-4.557, p = 0.050) were confirmed as independent prognostic factors. AD did not influence the OS of patients with singular positive lymph nodes (p = 0.41), while in patients with multiple lymph nodes and AD, a significantly better 3YOS was demonstrated, i.e., 49.1% vs. 30% (p = 0.004). In patients with N2 + N1 involvement, age (p = 0.002) and AD (p = 0.022) were favorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenocarcinoma patients with single N2 station involvement had a favorable outcome in the case of skip metastases and low NR. Adjuvant therapy improves survival with multiple nodal involvement, while its role in single node involvement should be clarified.

Mediastinal radiotherapy after adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non–small cell lung cancer with N2 lymphadenopathy: A novel meta-analysis

Introduction

Treatment for stage IIIA N2 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically involves a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, but the optimal sequencing is not determined. Local recurrence rates following surgery remain high, and the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in N2 disease is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether PORT provides additional survival advantage beyond observation for patients with stage IIIA N2 disease who have undergone complete surgical resection and received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

All studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone after curative surgical resection for stage IIIA N2 NSCLC were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects modelling in accordance with MOOSE (Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies) guidelines. Subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, and risk of bias were assessed, with meta-regression to determine the effects of patient and tumor characteristics on outcomes.

Results

Ten studies with a pooled dataset of 18,077 patients (5453 PORT, 12,624 no PORT) were included. PORT significantly improved both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.768; DFS: HR, 0.733), 3 years (OS: HR, 0.914; DFS: HR, 0.732), and 5 years (OS: HR, 0.898; DFS: HR, 0.735, all P < .0001). These effects were independent of specific patient or tumor characteristics.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a significant DFS and OS benefit from the addition of PORT following adjuvant chemotherapy. We advocate the consideration of PORT for such patients following specialist multidisciplinary assessment and comprehensive discussion of the benefits and risks of treatment.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with completely resected pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study examined the incidence of pathologic N2 (pN2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and prognostic factors affecting survival of these patients.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients who underwent surgery for NSCLC (lobectomy and pneumonectomy) between January 2008 and December 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients with pN2 included in this study were assessed in two groups; single pN2 and multiple pN2.

RESULTS

The most common type of resection was lobectomy (56.3%). Ninety-four patients (79%) received adjuvant therapy. Eighty-six patients (72.3%) had single-station pN2 and 33 (27.7%) had multiple pN2. The 5-year survival rates were 29.3% overall, 38.6% in single-station pN2, and 11% in multiple-station pN2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.581, p = .037). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival rates between patients with pN1N2 and those with pN0N2 involvement (39.1% vs. 37.1%) (p = .625). Not receiving adjuvant therapy was associated with poor survival prognosis (HR: 8.2 p < .001). The 5-year survival rate was 36.2% among patients with pN2 involvement with 2 or more positive lymph nodes and 19.5% among those with fewer than 2 positive lymph nodes (HR: 0.83, p = .463).

CONCLUSIONS

The most significant prognostic factors associated with survival were pN2 status. Non-skip metastases (pN1N2) and positive lymph node count were not associated with prognosis.

Prognostic Factors Determining Survival of Patients Operated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Consideration Given to Morphological Parameters of Blood

Introduction

Prognostic biomarkers are the area of high interest in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inflammatory blood markers can be routinely determined from complete blood counts which are inexpensive and reliable. The aim of the study was to determine prognostic parameters which, in early diagnostics, best determine survival of patients, operated on due to NSCLC.

Materials

The study was conducted on 532 (174 females and 358 males) patients, operated on due to NSCLC, in stages IA – III, aged 36–84 years (the mean age: 63.6 years). The following parameters were subjected to a statistical analysis, conducted in order to determine prognostic values of the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, haemoglobin, RDW-CV and MCV, calculated values of PLR, NLR, and LMR ratios, age, sex, smoking, histopathological diagnosis, T stage, N stage, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), type of surgery, and potential complications.

Results

The univariate analysis revealed an impact of NLR, PLR, and LMR values, RDW-CW and CCI ranges, and also the number of monocytes on patients’ overall survival (OS). The multivariate analysis identified six independent negative prognostic factors: male sex (0.001), CCI > 4 (p=0.000007), RDW-CV > 14.5% and PLR > 144 (p=0.000001, p= 0.001, respectively), the number of metastatic N2 lymphatic nodes (p=0.0003), and existence of post-operative complications (p=0.008).

Conclusion

Patients’ sex, RDW and PLR values, Charlson index, the number of involved N2 nodes by cancer and postoperative complications are independent and significant prognostic factors in patients operated on due to NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 in EGFR-Mutant/ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Defining the optimal neoadjuvant strategy in early-stage and locoregional (N2) oncogenic-driven lung cancer remains a major challenge for the scientific community. Whereas significant advances have been achieved with the use of personalized medicine and targeted therapies in advanced stages, we are still far from translating the same magnitude of benefits into an earlier-stage disease. Perioperative strategies with neoadjuvant and adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR and ALK gene alterations have yielded mixed results and further biomarker-driven trials are needed to shed more light on the significance of inhibiting the oncogenic signaling addiction at earlier stages of the disease and the conceivable value of incorporating more potent targeted inhibitors in this setting. Meanwhile, the landscape of early-stage lung cancer management is progressing rapidly, and we anticipate the incorporation of novel immunotherapeutic agents on the basis of this promising preliminary activity as induction strategies. Whether the benefits observed in the overall population can be translated into specific subsets of oncogenic-driven tumors is still unknown, but it clearly reinforces the importance of incorporating—sooner rather than later—a biomarker-testing strategy into the routine work-up of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are still many challenges to overcome such as the need to stablish standardized surrogate endpoints and to define the optimal duration of perioperative treatment, as well as how to expedite patient recruitment using enrichment strategies for biomarker stratified trials. Despite the difficulties, we are living in exciting times and coming up on a new window of opportunities for achieving the ultimate goal of curing early-stage lung cancer and improving long-term outcomes by eliminating the minimal residual disease and reducing the risk for metastatic recurrence.

Postoperative long-term survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with skip-N2 metastases

OBJECTIVE

Radical lymphadenectomy is crucial in operations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Usually pN1 and pN2 lymph nodes are affected consecutively (N1N2). Nevertheless, pN2 metastases may also occur in the absence of pN1 as skip-N2 metastases (N0N2). Here we compare the long-term survival of N1N2- and N0N2 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

464 patients underwent surgery for NSCLC at our institution between 2012 and 2017. We retrospectively reviewed data of pN2 stage patients (n = 68). Patients with N1N2 (n = 39) were compared to N0N2 (n = 29) patients. 1-, 3-and 5-year survival rates were measured. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival. All patients received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy according to European guidelines.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. We observed no differences in the histology, localization, or gender in our cohort. N0N2 patients showed significantly better 1- (N1N2: 82.4% vs. N0N2 100%; p = 0.001), 3- (14.7% vs. 63.6%; p=<0.001) and 5-year (9.4% vs. 43.8%; p = 0.001) survival rates. Tumor size (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, Confidence interval (CI 95%) 1.03-2.04; p = 0.03) and the occurrence of N1N2 (HR 4.26, CI 2.04-8.91; p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for worse long-term survival. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a reduced overall survival for N1N2 patients (log-rank N1N2, N0N2 p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

N1N2 patients have a significantly worse prognosis compared to N0N2 patients. This will aid to classify the heterogeneous pN2-NSCLC patient population more precisely. Further, multimodal therapy should be considered for N1N2 patients.

[Prognostic Factors of N2 Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Surgery]

背景与目的

N2期非小细胞肺癌患者预后异质性很强，本研究旨在探索其预后相关因素。

方法

纳入四川大学华西医院胸外科2007年1月-2016年12月间行根治性切除的N2期患者，使用Cox模型比较临床病理学特征与总体生存率之间的关系，使用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线，并且根据淋巴结转移情况进行亚组分析。

结果

总共纳入773例N2期患者，中位随访时间57.2个月，5年总体生存率为34.8%。肿瘤原发灶-淋巴结-远处转移（tumor-node-metastasis, TNM）分期、多站淋巴结转移、跳跃性转移、脉管侵犯、辅助化疗为预后相关的独立风险因素。T1-3期患者具有相似的预后，T4期患者预后明显更差。单站跳跃性转移的患者预后最好，5年生存率达48.9%。

结论

N2患者中T4期预后差。在将来的分期中应结合淋巴结转移站数和跳跃性转移进行更精细的N分期划分。

Postoperative radiotherapy option based on mediastinal lymph node reclassification for patients with pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

In this research, we used the mediastinal lymph node reclassification proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (iaslc) to screen for patients with pathologic N2 (pN2) non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) who might benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (port).

Methods

The study enrolled 440 patients with pN2 nsclc who received complete surgical resection and allocated them to one of three groups: N2a1 (single-station skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis), N2a2 (single-station non-skip mediastinal lymph node metastasis), and N2b (multi-station mediastinal lymph node metastasis). Rates of local recurrence at first recurrence in patients receiving and not receiving port were compared using the chi-square test. Overall (os) and disease-free survival (dfs) were then compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test. In addition, the factors potentially influencing os and dfs were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression.

Results

The rate of local recurrence for the N2a2 and N2b groups was significantly lower in patients receiving port (p = 0.044 and p = 0.043 respectively). The log-rank test revealed that, for the N2a1 group, differences in os and dfs were not statistically significant between the patients who did and did not receive port (p = 0.304 and p = 0.197 respectively). For the N2a2 group, os and dfs were markedly superior in patients who received port compared with those who did not (p = 0.001 and p = 0.014 respectively). For the N2b group, os was evidently better in patients who received port compared with those who did not (p = 0.025), but no statistically significant difference in dfs was observed (p = 0.134). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that, in the N2a1 group, port was significantly associated with poor os [hazard ratio (hr): 2.618; 95% confidence interval (ci): 1.185 to 5.785; p = 0.017]; in the N2a2 group, port was associated with improved os (hr: 0.481; 95% ci: 0.314 to 0.736; p = 0.001) and dfs (hr: 0.685; 95% ci: 0.479 to 0.980; p = 0.039).

Conclusions

For patients with pN2 nsclc who receive complete resection, port might be beneficial only for patients with single-station non-skip metastasis (N2a2). Patients with single-station skip metastasis (N2a1) and multi-station metastasis (N2b) might not currently benefit from port.

Skip N2 Metastasis in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: Good Prognosis Similar to N1 Disease

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic effect and mechanism of skip N2 lung cancer remain unclear. Our study aimed to elucidate the influence of skip N2 on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with N1 and non-skip N2 in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma and lymph node involvement between May 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes of skip N2 patients were compared with N1 and non-skip N2 patients. Prognosis was further investigated according to the N status in different adenocarcinoma subtypes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to define independent risk factors for OS and DFS.

RESULTS

A total of 456 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, 169 with N1 disease, 81 with skip N2 disease, and 206 with non-skip N2 disease, were enrolled in this study. All tumors were invasive adenocarcinoma, and the predominant subtypes were acinar in 252, papillary in 42, solid in 119, micropapillary in 20, and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma in 23 patients. The DFS and OS of N1 and skip N2 diseases were similar and significantly better than those of patients with non-skip N2 disease. The prognosis according to lymph node status was significantly different in acinar-predominant subtypes in terms of both OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Skip N2 disease has a similar prognosis to N1 disease and is significantly better than that of non-skip N2 disease in relation to OS and DFS. Skip N2 has a prognostic advantage in patients with the acinar-predominant subtype.

Survival benefit of skip metastases in surgically resected N2 non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter observational study of a large cohort of the Chinese patients

INTRODUCTION

N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without N1 involvement, also known as skip metastases (pN0N2), has been suggested as a subgroup of heterogeneous N2 disease with better survival. This real-world observational study aimed to elucidate the prognostic impacts of skip N2 metastases using a large number of pathologic N2 NSCLC from 10 participating centers in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of pN2 NSCLC patients after surgical resection at 10 thoracic surgery centers between January 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed based on the LinkDoc database. Clinical data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes were collected. Overall survival of patients with and without skip metastases was evaluated and compared by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was established to identify potential prognostic predictors. Subgroup analysis was carried out to further explore the prognostic significance of skip metastases.

RESULTS

Among 2653 surgically resected N2 patients, 881 (33.2%) had skip metastases. Patients with skip N2 had a significant better overall survival (P = 0.0019). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed borderline significance of skip metastases (HR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.645-1.017, P = 0.0698) after adjustment for other covariates. Other independent prognostic predictors included smoking history, tumor location, stage and N2 station involved (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant survival benefits of skip N2 in most subpopulations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested a prognostic benefit of skip N2 metastases in real world practice. Further subdivision of N2 disease is warranted for better patient management and prognostic prediction (NCT03429192).

Single-station skip-N2 disease: good prognosis in resected non-small-cell lung cancer (long-term results in skip-N2 disease)

OBJECTIVES

Pathological N2 (pN2) involvement has a negative impact on prognosis in patients operated on due to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). pN2 disease may cause skip (pN0N2) or non-skip (pN1N2) metastases with pathological N1 (pN1) involvement. The effect of pN2 subgroups on prognosis is still controversial. We analysed the effect of pN1 disease and single-station pN2 disease subgroups on survival outcomes.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent anatomical lung resection due to NSCLC at a single centre between January 2007 and January 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Operative mortality, sublobar resection, Stage IV disease, incomplete resection and carcinoid tumour were considered exclusion criteria. After histopathological examination, the prognosis of patients with pN1, pN0N2 and pN1N2 was compared statistically. Univariable and multivariable analyses were made to define independent risk factors for overall survival rates.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time for 358 patients with 228 pN1 disease (63.7%), 59 pN0N2 disease (16.5%) and 71 pN1N2 disease (19.8%) was 40.4 ± 30.4 months. Median and 5-year overall survival rates for pN1, pN0N2 and pN1N2 diseases were 73.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 55.5-91.7] and 54.1%, 60.3 months (95% CI 26.8-93.8) and 51.2%, 20.8 months (95% CI 16.1-25.5) and 21.5%, respectively. The survival CIs of pN1 and pN0N2 diseases were similar, and the survival rates of these 2 groups were significantly better than those with pN1N2 (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariable analysis, patients over the age of 60 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.13, P < 0.001], patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (HR 1.52, P = 0.01) and patients with pN1N2 disease (HR 2.91, P < 0.001) had a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, not receiving adjuvant therapy and having pN1N2 disease are negative prognostic factors in patients with nodal involvement who underwent curative resection due to NSCLC. The overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of pN1 disease and single-station pN0N2 disease are similar, and they have significantly better survival rates than pN1N2 disease. Based on these results, surgical treatment may be considered an appropriate choice in patients with histopathologically diagnosed single-station skip-N2 disease.

Postoperative radiotherapy is effective in improving survival of patients with stage pIII-N2 non-small-cell lung Cancer after pneumonectomy

Background

There were few reports of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in stage pIII-N2 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving pneumonectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of PORT among these patients.

Methods

Between Jan. 2004 and Dec. 2015, stage pIII-N2 NSCLC patients receiving pneumonectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without PORT in our institution were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Totally 119 patients were included, 32 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT (PORT group) and 87 receiving adjuvant chemotherapy alone (Control group). There were more patients with non-R0 resection in PORT group than Control group (25% vs. 8%, p = 0.031). In PORT group, ≥Grade 2 radiation-induced pneumonitis was 2/32. No severe radiation-related heart injury was observed. There was no PORT-related death. Of all patients, median follow-up time was 25 months. Median overall survival time (mOS) and median disease-free survival time (mDFS) were 46 months and 15 months, respectively. The PORT group had significantly better OS (not reached vs. 34 months, p = 0.003), DFS (19 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.024), local recurrence free survival (LRFS, p = 0.012), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS, p = 0.047) than the Control group. As for failure pattern, PORT significantly reduced local regional failure rate (39.1% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.016). In subgroup analysis, patients with R0 resection (n = 104), OS and LRFS in PORT group were significantly longer, and PORT tended to increase DFS and DMFS.

Conclusion

For patients with stage pIII-N2 NSCLC after pneumonectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT can improve OS, DFS, LRFS and DMFS with tolerable toxicity.

Induction Therapies Plus Surgery Versus Exclusive Radiochemotherapy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

In spite of the growing body of data from prospective randomized clinical trials (PRCTs) and meta-analyses, the optimal treatment approach in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. This review focuses on the available data directly confronting induction chemotherapy or induction radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) when followed by surgery with exclusive RT-CHT. Seven PRCTs and 4 meta-analyses investigated this issue. In addition, numerous retrospective studies attempted to identify potential predictors and/or prognosticators that may have influenced the decision to offer surgery in a particular patient subgroup. Several retrospective studies also evaluated exclusive RT-CHT in this setting. There is not a single piece of the highest level of evidence (PRCT or MA) showing any advantage of induction therapies followed by surgery over exclusive RT-CHT with the former treatment option leading to significantly more morbidity and mortality. Although several studies attempted to identify patient subgroups favoring induction therapies followed by surgery, they have invariably been retrospective in nature, and their results have never been reproduced even in other retrospective setting. Furthermore, no PRCT investigated potential pretreatment patient and/or tumor-related predictors of surgical multimodality success. Exclusive RT-CHT achieves similar results to induction therapies followed by surgery but with less morbidity and mortality. This is accompanied with the finding that no pretreatment predictor exists to enable identification of even a subgroup of stage IIIA/pN2 patients benefiting from any surgical approach.

Role of Skip Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis for Patients With Resectable Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

N2 disease represents a heterogeneous group of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with varying 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. The skip N2 phenomenon is quite frequent, and its prognostic impact remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to further assess the clinical significance and prognostic value of skip N2 disease using propensity score matching.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study cohort included 437 patients with stage pN2 NSCLC who underwent resection from 2005 to 2011. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics were identified in the overall cohort. The effect of skip N2 on OS was assessed, stratified by histology, tumor size, N2 involved stations, and T stage after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients had skip N2 diseases in our study. Skip N2 metastasis was associated with age, tumor size, histology, and number of involved N2 stations. Matching of 130 pairs of patients showed that skip N2 was associated with a significantly better 5-year OS rate when compared with non-skip N2 disease (42.7% vs. 25.3%; P = .004), and OS is significantly better in the patients with tumor size of ≤ 3 cm (P = .014) or patients with single N2 station involvement (P = .002). Skip N2 conferred a significantly better OS in stage IIIA (P = .026) and IIIB (P = .029) disease.

CONCLUSION

The presence of skip N2 metastasis was a good prognostic factor of resectable N2 disease. N2 disease may be classified into more subgroups in the revision of the current tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) system.

The impact on mediastinal recurrence based on the number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes and assessed N2 Stations in patients with stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma

Background

To determine the impact of the number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and assessed N2 stations on the mediastinal recurrence for pathologic stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IADC).

Methods

A total of 2,048 patients with stage I IADC undergoing surgical resection were enrolled at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2009 to 2013. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method along with univariable and multivariable cox regression analysis.

Results

For patients with ≥5 MLNs, mediastinum-specific relapse-free survival (MS-RFS) rates were 98.3% and 96.6% for 3- and 5-year, respectively, which significantly demonstrated better survival outcomes against those with <5 MLNs (96.3% and 92.8%, respectively, log-rank P=0.018). Additionally, the 3- and 5-year RFS of patients with assessed N2 stations ≥3 (98.2% and 95.8%) were exceptionally better when compared with those with N2 stations <3 (95.5%, 90.3%, log-rank P<0.001). In the univariable and multivariable cox analyses, we found that the number of assessed N2 stations was an independent predictor to MS-RFS (HR =0.468; 95% CI, 0.312-0.867; P=0.020) as opposed to the number of harvested MLNs (HR =0.856; 95% CI, 0.423-1.489; P=0.543) which was not a predictor.

Conclusions

Based on our results, we recommend, for a better MS-RFS among patients with pathological stage I IADC, that the cutoff values for harvested MLNs and assessed N2 stations be 5 and 3, respectively. In addition, the number of assessed N2 stations was still an independent predictor to MS-RFS.

Postoperative Radiotherapy for Surgically Resected ypN2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with clinical stage III-N2 (cIII-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with induction chemotherapy and surgical resection with persistent ypN2 disease is not well established.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database for patients with cIII-N2 NSCLC who underwent induction chemotherapy followed by resection (2004-2016). Exclusion criteria included induction radiotherapy, non-biopsy-confirmed cN2 disease, incomplete resection, ypN0/1, and nonanatomic resection. The primary outcome was locoregional recurrence (LR); secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), lung cancer-specific death (LCSD), and overall survival (OS). Associations between variables and outcomes were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk regression for LR/LCSD and Cox proportional hazard models for survival.

RESULTS

Of the 501 patients identified with cIII-N2 disease, 99 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-137 months). Sixty-nine patients (70%) received PORT. Sixty (61%) developed a recurrence: 3 (5%) with an initial isolated LR and 57 (95%) with an initial distant recurrence. On multivariable analysis, PORT was not associated with LR (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.22-1.21], p = 0.13). PORT was also not associated with DFS (p = 0.6) or LCSD (p = 0.1). PORT was associated with improved 3-year OS (55% [95% CI, 42%-71%]) versus the no-PORT group (50% [95% CI, 34%-74%]) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

PORT is not independently associated with decreased LR or improved DFS/LCSD in this patient population. Given that the predominant failure pattern was distant recurrence, future clinical trials should focus on adjuvant systemic therapies, which may decrease distant recurrences in ypN2 patients.

Nomograms for predicting progression and efficacy of post-operation radiotherapy in IIIA-pN2 non-small cell lung cancer patients

In this retrospective study, we developed nomograms for predicting the efficacy of post-operation radiotherapy (PORT) in IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In total, 334 patients received post-operational chemotherapy and were included in the analysis. Of those, 115 also received either concurrent or sequential post-operational radiotherapy (PORT). Nomograms were developed using Cox proportional hazard regression models to identify clinicopathological characteristics that predicted progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and subgroup analyses of the effects of PORT were performed using nomogram risk scores. PFS and OS predicted using the nomogram agreed well with actual PFS and OS, and patients with high PFS/OS nomogram scores had poorer prognoses. In subgroup analyses, PORT increased survival more in patients with low PFS nomogram risk scores or high OS nomogram risk scores. Thus, our novel nomogram risk score model predicted PFS, OS, and the efficacy of PORT in IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients.

Survival Impact of Stations of Pathological Lymph Nodes in N2 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in a French Hospital

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of lung cancer remains poor; only 20% of patients can undergo surgery. N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the impact of N2 location on survival.

METHODS

This study included 342 NSCLC with N2 involvement between 1988 and 2014. Patient-related data were collected through the CRB biobank and included demographic, therapeutic, and survival data. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Maier method. Cox's regression analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to determine factors significantly associated with survival.

RESULTS

The population average age was 61.6 years; 82.2% were men, a majority were former smokers (87.1%), and 45.3% had adenocarcinoma. The main prognostic factors were male gender (p = 0.01), number of nodes (p < 0.0001), and tumor size (p < 0.0001). N2 disease had a poor survival (16 months) compared with N0 (32 months) and N1 (21.1 months) disease (p < 0.0001). The patients with involvement of station 4 (survival = 17.8 months) seemed to have a prognosis between those with station 7 (survival = 10.5 months) and N1 (survival = 22.6 months), p = 0.0005.

CONCLUSIONS

N2 location has a prognostic impact in surgically NSCLC, and station 4 involvement has a better prognostic than station 7.

Mutational Diversity of Lung Cancer and Associated Lymph Nodes. An Exploratory Prospective Study of 4 Resected cIIIA-N2

Mutational heterogeneity could explain different metastatic patterns among IIIA-N2 lung cancer and influence prognosis. The identification of subclonal mutations using deep sequencing to evaluate the degree of molecular heterogeneity may improve IIIA-N2 classification. The aim of this prospective study was to assess mutational and immunohistochemical characteristics in primary tumours and involved lymph nodes (LN) in operated patients. Four patients operated for primary lung carcinoma and unisite N2 mediastinal involvement were consecutively selected. Samples (tumour and paired LN) were analysed for PD1, PD-L1 and CD8 immunostaining. Somatic mutation testing was performed by deep targeted next generation sequencing (NGS), with the AmpliSeq™ Colon and Lung Cancer Panel (LifeTechnology). A total of 9 primary lung cancer samples and 10 LN stations were analysed. For each cancer, we found 2 mutations, with allelic ratios from 3% to 72%. Mutational patterns were heterogeneous for 2 primary tumours. In 3 cases, mutations observed in the primary tumour were not found in LN metastases (ALK, FGFR3, MET). Inversely, in 1 case, a KRAS mutation was found in LN but not in the primary tumour. All primary tumours were found PD-L1 positive while CD8+ T cells infiltrate varied. In the different examined LN samples, PD-L1 expression, CD8+ and PD1+ T cells infiltrate were not similar to the primary tumour. This preliminary prospective study shows the diversity of intra-tumour and LN mutations using routinely-used targeted NGS, concerning both mutated gene and allelic ratio. Further studies are needed to evaluate its prognostic impact.

Can mathematics replace anatomy to establish recommendations in lung cancer surgery?

The greater the number of lymph node (LN) sampled (NLNsS) during lung cancer surgery, the lower the risk of underestimating the pN-status and the better the outcome of the pN0-patients due to stage-migration. Thus, regarding LN sampling "to be or not to be", number is the question. Recent studies advocate removing 10 LNs. The most suitable NLNsS is unfortunately impossible to establish by mathematics. A too high NLNsS variability exists, based on anatomy, surgery and pathology. The methodology may vary according to Inter-institutional differences in the surgical approach regarding LN inspection and number sampling. The NLNsS increases with the type of resection: sublobar, lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Concerning pathology, one LN may be divided into several pieces, leading to number overestimation. The pathological examination is limited by the number of slices analyzed by LN. The examined LNs can arbitrarily depend on the probability of detecting nodal metastasis. In fact, the only way to ensure the best NLNsS and the best pN-staging is to remove all LNs from the ipsilateral mediastinal and hilar LN-stations as they are discovered by thoroughly dissecting their anatomical locations. In doing so, a deliberate lack of harvest of LNs is unlikely, number turns out not to be the question anymore and a low NLNsS no longer means incomplete surgery. This prevents from judging as incomplete a complete LN dissection in a patient with a small NLNsS and from considering as complete a true incomplete one in a patient with a great NLNsS. Precise information describing the course of the operation and furnished in the surgeon's reports is also advisable to further improve the quality of LN-dissection, which ultimately might be beneficial in the long-term to patients. However, that procedure is of limited interest in pN-staging if LNs are not thoroughly examined and also described by the pathologist.

N2-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a plea for surgery!

Management of stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer is still matter of ongoing controversy. The debate is flawed by the heterogeneity of this group of patients, lack of strong evidence from controlled trials, diverging treatment strategies, and hesitating estimation of prognosis. Surgery is credited a survival advantage in a trimodality setting. For many teams, N2 is by principle managed with induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery if the patient is down-staged. However, surgery remains a suitable option even in case of persistent N2. On the other hand, outcomes are comparable, regardless whether chemotherapy has been given as induction or adjuvant treatment. Hence, upfront surgery without invasive staging, followed by adjuvant therapies, appears reasonable in resectable single station N2 disease, simplifying patient care and reducing cost. We expect that molecular biomarkers will improve estimation of prognosis and patient selection in the future.

Prognostic Impact of Node-Spreading Pattern in Surgically Treated Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although surgery in selected small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients has been proposed as a part of multimodality therapy, so far, the prognostic impact of node-spreading pattern has not been fully elucidated. To investigate this issue, a retrospective analysis was performed.

METHODS

From 01/1996 to 12/2012, clinico-pathological, surgical, and oncological features were retrospectively reviewed in a multicentric cohort of 154 surgically treated SCLC patients. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression, in order to identify independent outcome predictors. Overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and Relapse-free survival (RFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Overall, median OS, CSS, and RFS were 29 (95 % CI 18-39), 48 (95 % CI 19-78), and 22 (95 % CI 17-27) months, respectively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 140 (90.9 %) patients (median number of harvested nodes: 11.5). Sixty-seven (47.9 %) pN0-cases experienced the best long-term survival (CSS: 71, RFS: 62 months; p < 0.0001). Among node-positive patients, no prognostic differences were found between pN1 and pN2 involvement (CSS: 22 vs. 15, and RFS: 14 vs. 10 months, respectively; p = 0.99). By splitting node-positive SCLC according to concurrent N1-invasion, N0N2-patients showed a worse CSS compared to those cases with combined N1N2-involvement (N0N2: 8 months vs. N1N2: 22 months; p = 0.04). On the other hand, the number of metastatic stations (p = 0.80) and the specific node-level (p = 0.85) did not affect CSS. At multivariate analysis, pN+ (HR: 3.05, 95 % CI 1.21-7.67, p = 0.02) and ratio between metastatic and resected lymph-nodes (RL, HR: 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of CSS. Moreover, node-positive patients (HR: 3.60, 95 % CI 1.95-6.63, p < 0.0001) with tumor size ≥5 cm (HR: 1.85, 95 % CI 0.88-3.88, p = 0.10) experienced a worse RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected surgically treated SCLC, the long-term survival may be stratified according to the node-spreading pattern.

The influence of the metastasis pattern of mediastinal lymph nodes on the postoperative radiotherapy's efficacy for the IIIA-pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 220 patients

Objective

The use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial for Stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, a possible reason is that IIIA-pN2 NSCLC diseases are a heterogeneous group with different clinicopathologic features. The aim of this research was to prove whether the mediastinal lymph nodes’ (LNs) skipping status could indicate the necessity of the PORT for the pN2 NSCLC patients.

Methods

The skip metastasis was defined as pN0N2 (no N1 LN involved), and nonskip metastasis was pN1N2 (one or more N1 LNs involved). Patients were divided into two groups: LNs nonskip and LNs skip, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) and postoperative chemotherapy. Then, the LN nonskip and LN skip groups were further divided into subgroups: POCRT and point of care testing (POCT) for subgroup analysis.

Results

There were 220 cases included in the analysis, and 43 of them received PORT. On univariate analysis, the median 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was, respectively, 16 months (27.7%) for the LN skip group and 11 months (15.3%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.001). The median 3-year overall survival (OS) was, respectively, 35 months (47.0%) for the LN skip group and 27 months (38.7%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.025). The median 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was, respectively, 25 months (41.0%) for the LN skip group and19 months (29.9%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.014). The median 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was, respectively, 22 months (32.5%) for the LN skip group and 15 months (20.4%) for the LN nonskip group (P=0.013). The median 3-year PFS was, respectively, 17 months (25.6%) for the POCRT group and 12 months (18.6%) for the POCT group (P=0.037). Although the POCRT group showed better OS, LRFS, and DMFS than the POCT group, the results showed no statistical significance. In subgroup analysis, there was no statistical significance in the Kaplan–Meier analysis between subgroups, but it showed that POCRT resulted in better PFS, OS, and DMFS in both LN skip and LN nonskip subgroups; this advantage was more obvious in the LN skip subgroup.

Conclusion

The LN skip status is closely related to the survival of the IIIA-N2 NSCLC disease, and the LN skip patients may get more benefit in PFS and LRFS than the LN nonskip patients from PORT.

[Clinical and paraclinical prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer prognosis is mainly based on the TNM, histology and molecular biology. Our aim was to analyze the prognostic value of certain clinical and paraclinical variables.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied among 6105 patients operated on, divided during 3 time-periods (1979 to 2010), the following prognostic factors: type of surgery, pTNM, histology, age, sex, smoking history, clinical presentation, and paraclinical variables.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was 4% (243/6105), rate of complications was 23.3% (1424/6105). The 5-year overall survival was 43.2% and 10-year was 27%. Best survival was observed after complete resection (R0) (P<10(-6)), lobectomy (P<10(-6)), lymph node dissection (P=0.0006), early pTNM stages (P<10(-6)), absence of a solid component in adenocarcinoma. Other pejorative factors were: male gender (P=10(-5)), age (P=0.0000002), comorbidity (P=0.016), history of cancer (P<10(-5)), postoperative complications (P=0.0018), FEV lower than 80% (P=0.0000025), time-periods (P<10(-6)). All these factors were confirmed by multivariate analysis, except gender. Smoking was not poor prognostic factor in univariate analysis (P=0.09) but became significant in the multivariate one (P=0.013).

CONCLUSION

Medical and human factors, and the general physiological state, play an important role in prognosis after surgery. We do not know their exact meaning and, like studies on chemotherapy, they justify special research.

Prognosis and segment-specific nodal spread of primary lung cancer in the right lower lobe

Background

Although lobe-specific nodal spread of primary lung cancer has been recently described, segment-specific nodal spread remains unclear. We investigated the frequency of hailer and mediastinal lymph node involvement and survival in patients with tumors located in the superior segment (SS) and basal segment (BS) in the right lower lobe.

Methods

Two hundred and sixty-three patients with primary lung cancer originating in the right lower lobe underwent lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. Patients were categorized into two groups: SS (n = 114) or BS (n = 149).

Results

Frequencies of metastasis to station 11s and 11i were significantly higher in the SS (P < 0.0001) and BS groups (P = 0.022), respectively. Both the SS and BS groups showed a high frequency of subcarinal mediastinal zone (station 7) metastasis (96.9% and 90.6%, respectively; P = 0.271). The frequencies of superior mediastinal zone (station 2R and 4R) metastasis were 37.5% in the SS and 35.8% in the BS group (P = 0.878). In patients with pN2 disease, three-year disease-free survival was significantly shorter in the SS (22.6%) than the BS group (42.1%; P = 0.020). In the BS group, the independent predictive factors of a poor or good prognosis were metastasis to station 11i or skip metastasis, respectively; however, we did not detect an independent prognostic factor in the SS group. In the right lower lung lobe, there was no segment-specific nodal spread.

Conclusion

When segmentectomy is undertaken, mediastinal lymph node dissection should be performed in proportion to lobectomy.

Reappraisal of the role of postoperative radiation therapy in patients with pIIIa-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

Reappraisal of the role of postoperative radiotherapy in pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients according to N1 lymph node involvement.

Methods

A total of 218 pIIIa-N2 NSCLC patients who underwent complete surgical resection with systematic nodal dissections were enrolled. Propensity scores were used for matching N1 involvement. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

After matching, pN2b patients without N1 involvement (pN0N2b) exhibited better prognoses than those with N1 involvement (pN1N2b) (5-year OS: 37.5% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.008; 5-year DFS: 31.8% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.004). Similar results were not detected in pN2a disease (5-year OS: 37.8% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.517; 5-year DFS: 27.1% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.788). The five-year OS of patients who received no adjuvant therapy (22 pN2a cases, 7 pN0N2b, 5 pN1N2b), adjuvant chemotherapy alone (74 pN2a cases, 11 pN0N2b, 17 pN1N2b) or chemoradiotherapy (25 pN2a cases, 7 pN0N2b, 6 pN1N2b) were compared (pN2a: 31.3%, 37.0%, and 32.0%, P = 0.808; pN0N2b: 0.0%, 18.2%, and 71.4%, P = 0.108; pN1N2b: 0.0%, 0.0%, and 33.3%, P < 0.0001). The five-year DFS was also analyzed (pN2a: 31.6%, 24.0%, and 18.3%, P = 0.410; pN0N2b: 0.0%, 11.1%, and 57.1%, P = 0.192; pN1N2b: 0.0%, 0.0%, and 16.7%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the novel classification based on N1 involvement and pN2a/pN2b staging was an independent prognostic factor of OS and DFS.

Conclusion

N1 involvement significantly impacted the prognosis of pN2b NSCLC patients. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in pN2a and pN0N2b patients requires confirmation by further study.