Adult surgical experience with Loeys-Dietz syndrome

Open Surgical Repair in a Patient With Loeys-Dietz Syndrome and Extensive Vascular Compromise: A Case Report and Literature Review

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) has been associated with multiple vascular abnormalities involving the entire arterial tree. However, limited reports regarding compromise in the aortoiliac and femoral bifurcation are available. Further, recommendations for optimal approach, thresholds for diameter at the time of surgery, and surveillance are also limited. We present a case of a 67-year-old male patient with LDS and aneurysmal aortoiliac and enlarging common femoral arteries aneurysms, who underwent open surgical repair. His past surgical history included multiple vascular interventions for lower extremity claudication and bilateral hip replacements. The right hip arthroplasty was previously removed due to infection. From the vascular standpoint, the patient underwent staged endovascular left hypogastric artery embolization and open aorto-bi-profunda bypass with a Rifampin-soaked Dacron graft. At 5-month follow-up, he remains asymptomatic with healed incisions and patent bypasses. This case highlights the challenges in managing peripheral aneurysms in LDS patients, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies. While open repair is preferred, endovascular options may be considered in selected cases. Surveillance remains critical with annual cross-sectional imaging. Surgical planning is intricate due to comorbidities, anatomical complexities, and previous surgical infection. Surveillance of these patients must be strict as multiple vascular and non-vascular complications may arise. Therefore, collaborative decision-making is essential for optimal outcomes in this known high-risk population with connective tissue disorders.

Impact of Genotype-Phenotype Interactions on Cardiovascular Function in Paediatric Loeys-Dietz Syndrome

Background

The relationship between genotype and phenotypical vascular and cardiac properties in paediatric Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) patients are not well characterized. This study explores the phenotypical differences in aortic properties and cardiac structural and functional parameters between paediatric LDS patients with TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 mutations.

Methods

We included 32 LDS patients with either TGFBR1 (n = 17) or TGFBR2 (n = 15) mutations. Echocardiographic data included aortic dimensions, distensibility, strain, and stiffness at the level of the annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, ascending aorta, and descending aorta. Parameters for left ventricular size and function were also recorded.

Results

Demographics were similar between the groups. Patients with TGFBR2 were more likely to have undergone aortic surgery (47% vs 12%, P = 0.057) and use angiotensin receptor blockers (93% vs 47%, P = 0.015). Aortic z scores were significantly larger in the TGFBR2 group at the level of the aortic valve annulus (P = 0.007), sinuses of Valsalva (P = 0.001), sinotubular junction (P = 0.001), and ascending aorta (P = 0.054). Patients with TGFBR2 also had significantly lower aortic distensibility and strain coupled with higher stiffness index at the level of the annulus, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta. Parameters for the descending aorta, cardiac morphology, and cardiac function were similar between the groups.

Conclusions

Paediatric LDS patients with TGFBR2 present with more severe cardiovascular phenotypes than patients with TGFBR1 with larger aortic dimensions and increased aortic stiffness. Our findings suggest that genotypes should be taken into consideration in the clinical management of paediatric LDS patients.

Total arch replacement using frozen elephant trunk and repair of bilateral subclavian artery aneurysms in a patient with type 2 Loeys-Dietz syndrome

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare connective tissue disorder. Vessel tortuosity and aneurysms throughout the vasculature are unique to LDS. Aortic root enlargement is ubiquitous, with most patients undergoing root replacement at some point in their lifetime. Multiple vascular procedures are required to prolong life expectancy. We describe a staged hybrid approach to a 17-year-old patient with LDS presenting with ascending aorta, arch, and bilateral subclavian artery aneurysms and prominent tortuosity. Transposition of the left vertebral and subclavian arteries onto the common carotid artery was performed. Total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk extension into the descending thoracic aorta was performed as a second stage. Bilateral subclavian artery aneurysms were excluded with the use of a four-branched graft.

Unusual presentation of Loeys-Dietz syndrome: A case report of clinical findings and treatment challenges

BACKGROUND

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by heterozygous mutations causing multisystemic alterations. It was recently described in 2005, and today at least six different subtypes have been identified. Classically presenting with aortic root enlargement or aneurysms and craniofacial and skeletal abnormalities, with specific arterial tortuosity at any site. The differential diagnosis of LDS includes atypical Marfan syndrome, vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg craniosynostosis, and familial aortic aneurysm and dissection syndrome.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case study of a 35-year-old female who came to the emergency department due to lower gastrointestinal bleeding and severe abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed vascular tortuosity in almost every abdominal vein.

CONCLUSION

This case report will help us analyze the infrequent presentation of LDS type 4 and the numerous complications that it implies, underlying the importance of publishing more cases in order to expand our knowledge and offer better treatment for these patients. Differential diagnosis, clinical presentation and treatment options for this syndrome are discussed in this article.

Long-term risk of arch complications in Loeys Dietz syndrome patients undergoing proximal ascending aortic replacement

PURPOSE

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare connective tissue disorder. In LDS patients with normal arch morphology, whether the arch should be prophylactically replaced at the time of proximal aortic replacement remains unknown. We evaluated the risk of long-term arch complications in genetically confirmed LDS patients who underwent proximal ascending aortic replacement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with LDS who have been followed at our institution between 1994 and 2020. Patients were only included if whole exome genetic testing confirmed a mutation in an LDS-causing gene (TGFBR1, TGFBR2, SMAD3, TGFB2, or TGFB3). Mutations were categorized as pathogenic, benign, or of unknown significance. We collected demographic information, aortic dimensions, comorbidities, mortality, and operative course from patients' charts. Descriptive statistics and freedom from reoperation plots were generated.

RESULTS

Of the 18 patients with a mutation in an LDS-causing gene, 15 had known pathogenic variants, two had mutations of unknown significance, and one had a benign genetic variant. For the 15 patients with confirmed pathogenic variants of LDS the median follow-up duration was 5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4-8). Eleven patients underwent ascending aortic replacements (AAR) ± aortic valve replacement. Two patients required an additional operation; one required arch and staged elephant trunk for a dissection 18 years post-AAR and the other patient required an isolated descending aortic replacement for dissection 5 years post-AAR. Among patients who underwent surgery, the median ascending aortic diameter at intervention was 5.0 cm (IQR: 4.3-5.3). There was no surgical or late follow-up mortality observed for any of the 18 patients in the study.

CONCLUSION

LDS patients who underwent proximal aortic replacement appeared to have low long-term risk of arch complications. While our study is somewhat limited by its sample size and follow-up duration, it suggests that routine prophylactic total arch replacement may not be warranted in LDS patients with nonaneurysmal aortic arches.

Surgical Evaluation and Management of Spinal Pathology in Patients with Connective Tissue Disorders

Connective tissue disorders represent a varied spectrum of syndromes that have important implications for the spine deformity surgeon. Spine surgeons must be aware of these diverse and global manifestations of disease because they have significant impact on perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

Hybrid Repair of a Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Associated with Loeys-Dietz Syndrome

Introduction

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a genetic syndrome caused by mutations in transforming growth factor beta receptors (TGFBR) 1 and 2. It can manifest with craniofacial, musculoskeletal, cognitive abnormalities, and vascular pathologies including early onset aortic root aneurysms, extensive aortic dissections, and TAAA. Open repair is considered the gold standard treatment but carries morbidity risks, especially in patients with multiple previous aortic procedures. Endovascular treatment is associated with treatment failure when used in the native aorta, because of inherent wall weakness precluding seal. This case report adds to the available literature on hybrid treatment of LDS associated aortic pathologies.

Report

This is the report of staged hybrid TAAA treatment in a 24 year old male patient with multiple previous aortic procedures via sternotomy and thoracotomy. Retrograde infrarenal aortic visceral debranching was performed using 14 mm by 7 mm bifurcated Dacron grafts. These emerged from the limbs of an 18 mm by 9 mm bifurcated Dacron graft in an aortobi-iliac reconstruction. This was followed by staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) seven days later using three endografts (26 mm–22 mm × 150 mm distal, 30 mm × 200 mm bridging, then 32 mm × 100 mm proximal). The endograft landed in an old thoracic aortic graft proximally and the new infrarenal aortic graft distally. Follow up at 11 months showed patency and no sac expansion.

Conclusion

Hybrid TAAA repair was a valid treatment option in this patient with LDS and multiple previous aortic procedures. It minimised the morbidity of revision surgery and mitigated potential treatment failure by achieving an endovascular seal in surgical grafts. Short term surveillance showed no complications. Limitations to making recommendations include lack of long term follow up.

•

This is the report of the hybrid treatment of a thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with Loeys-Dietz Syndrome and a hostile thoracic cavity.

•

Repair involved open retrograde abdominal aortic visceral debranching followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair landing in grafts proximally and distally.

•

Follow up at 11 months showed no complications.

Prosthetic graft replacement of a large subclavian aneurysm in a child with Loeys-Dietz syndrome: a case report

Background

Loeys–Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a genetic connective tissue disorder, which is characterized by rapid development of aortic and peripheral arterial aneurysms. Loeys–Dietz syndrome has some overlapping phenotypic features with other inherited aortopathies such as Marfan syndrome. However, LDS has a more aggressive vascular course with patient morbidity and mortality occurring at an early age.

Case summary

We present the rare case of an 11-year-old girl with LDS who underwent valve sparing aortic root replacement at the age of 2.9 years with good results. She had routine follow-up cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and was found to have a large aneurysm of the right subclavian artery. After multidisciplinary team discussion, successful surgical resection with prosthetic graft replacement of the right subclavian artery was performed.

Discussion

This case illustrates that large aneurysms of aortic branches can already develop in childhood and underlines the need for frequent follow-ups including cross-sectional imaging and multidisciplinary team management.

Endovascular repair of a dissecting pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with type III Loeys-Dietz syndrome

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) type 3 results from a SMAD3 mutation and is a phenotypically milder variant of LDS with frequent aortic, visceral, and cerebral vascular pathologies and osteoarthritis. Historically, endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair [EVAR]) of LDS-related aortic aneurysmal disease with traditional modular bifurcated devices has been limited owing to concerns regarding continued aortic dilation at proximal fixation sites. Furthermore, associated dissection pathology has also precluded traditional modular bifurcated EVAR owing to inadequate proximal infrarenal necks and narrow distal aortic domains leading to compromised contralateral gate opening and cannulation as well as limb flow compromise. To address these barriers to EVAR, we present our approach for the endovascular treatment of a dissecting pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm using an anatomically fixated, bifurcated, unibody aortic stent graft in a patient with LDS-3.

Type A Aortic Dissection Caused by Loeys-Dietz Syndrome with Novel Variation

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare autosomal-dominant connective tissue disorder that can lead to aortic aneurysm and dissection. There are 5 different types caused by mutations in TGFβR1 (transforming growth factor β receptor), TGFβR2, SMAD3, TGFβ2 (transforming growth factor β), and TGFβ3 respectively. The prevalence of LDS is estimated to be less than 1 in 100,000. There is considerable variability in the phenotype of LDS, from mild features to severe systemic abnormalities. There is overlap in the manifestations of LDS and Marfan syndrome, including increased risk of ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, as well as abnormally long limbs and fingers. Management can be very challenging with a high risk of complications with revascularization. We report a 60-year-old female who presented with a type A aortic dissection that originated from the aortic root and extended to the bilateral common femoral arteries. Genetic testing revealed a novel alteration of the TGFβR1 gene (c689 C>A in exon 4) that to our knowledge has not been previously reported or found in large population cohorts. She was managed through a Bentall procedure that was complicated by a graft tear and stenosis of the distal anastomosis site, in addition to requiring a temporary pacemaker implantation and hemodialysis after the procedure. Ultimately, the patient was able to recover fully.

Case-matched Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcome in Loeys-Dietz Syndrome versus Marfan Syndrome

Background: Pathogenic variants in TGFBR1, TGFBR2 and SMAD3 genes cause Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and pathogenic variants in FBN1 cause Marfan syndrome. Despite their similar phenotypes, both syndromes may have different cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Three expert centers performed a case-matched comparison of cardiovascular outcomes. The Loeys-Dietz group comprised 43 men and 40 women with a mean age of 34 ± 18 years. Twenty-six individuals had pathogenic variants in TGFBR1, 40 in TGFBR2, and 17 in SMAD3. For case-matched comparison we used 83 age and sex-frequency matched individuals with Marfan syndrome. Results: In Loeys-Dietz compared to Marfan syndrome, a patent ductus arteriosus (p = 0.014) was more prevalent, the craniofacial score was higher (p < 0.001), the systemic score lower (p < 0.001), and mitral valve prolapse less frequent (p = 0.003). Mean survival for Loeys-Dietz and Marfan syndrome was similar (75 ± 3 versus 73 ± 2 years; p = 0.811). Cardiovascular outcome was comparable between Loeys-Dietz and Marfan syndrome, including mean freedom from proximal aortic surgery (53 ± 4 versus 48 ± 3 years; p = 0.589), distal aortic repair (72 ± 3 versus 67 ± 2 years; p = 0.777), mitral valve surgery (75 ± 4 versus 65 ± 3 years; p = 0.108), and reintervention (20 ± 3 versus 14 ± 2 years; p = 0.112). In Loeys-Dietz syndrome, lower age at initial presentation predicted proximal aortic surgery (HR = 0.748; p < 0.001), where receiver operating characteristic analysis identified ≤33.5 years with increased risk. In addition, increased aortic sinus diameters (HR = 6.502; p = 0.001), and higher systemic score points at least marginally (HR = 1.175; p = 0.065) related to proximal aortic surgery in Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Conclusions: Cardiovascular outcome of Loeys-Dietz syndrome was comparable to Marfan syndrome, but the severity of systemic manifestations was a predictor of proximal aortic surgery.

Cardiovascular surgery in Loeys-Dietz syndrome types 1-4

OBJECTIVES

The first publication of Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) described aortic rupture at young ages. Experience with new LDS types showed that the clinical course varies, and thresholds for prophylactic surgery are discussed. As this is an uncommon disease, experience needs to be shared.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with LDS types 1-4 undergoing cardiovascular surgery during the years 1991-2016.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (including 6 children with LDS2) underwent 57 operations. LDS 1, 2, 3 and 4 included 4, 17, 11 and 3 patients, respectively. Mean age at first surgery was 36 years, with a non-significant trend that LDS2 patients were younger. Of the 9 emergency surgeries, 7 were type A dissections, with 1 postoperative death. Twenty-two patients had prophylactic aortic root surgery (17 valve-sparing root replacements), with 1 postoperative death, 1 reoperation with valve replacement and 1 late death. Freedom from root reintervention and death was 92% at 13 years. Of the 11 patients with LDS3, 5 needed mitral valve surgery. Mitral valve disease was not found in the other LDS types. Ten patients needed >1 operation. Of the 57 operations, 33 were in the ascending aorta, 20 in the aorta distal to the arch including branches and 4 were isolated heart surgeries. Of the 20 vascular operations, 16 were in LDS2. Cumulative survival 20 years after first surgery (all patients) was 94.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical course seems to be more aggressive in LDS2, with index operation at a younger age, and higher risk of needing several operations. Vascular disease distal to the arch is not uncommon. LDS3 seems to be associated with mitral valve disease. Prophylactic aortic root surgery is safe and durable.

Aortic treatment in connective tissue disease

Connective tissue disease (CTD) represents a group of genetic conditions characterized by disruptive matrix remodeling. When this process involves aortic and vascular wall, patients with CTD have a high risk of developing arterial aneurysms, dissections and ruptures. Open surgical repair is still the gold standard therapy for patients with CTD with reasonable morbidity and mortality risk. The surgical treatment of CTD often requires multiple operations. In the endovascular era, fenestrated and branched stent grafts may play a role in reducing the complications of multiple open operations. Although the long-term results of endovascular treatment in the setting of CTD are unknown, it is generally accepted that endovascular treatment is restricted to selected patients with high surgical risk. In an emergency setting, endovascular intervention can serve as a lifesaving bridge to elective open aortic repair. Aortic centers performing a large volume of complex open and endovascular aortic repairs have started to combine these two techniques in a staged fashion. The goal is to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with extensive aortic repairs in CTD patients. For this reason, recommend endovascular therapy when a "graft-to-graft" approach is possible. In this scenario, the surgeon who performs the open repair must take into consideration future interventions. Surgical repair in any aortic segment should allow creation of proximal and distal landing zones over 4 cm to secure the sealing of a future stent graft. Connective tissue disease should be treated with a multidisciplinary approach, in high volume centers. Endovascular treatment represents a potential option in patients at high risk for open repair. Staged hybrid procedures have emerged as a way to reduce spinal cord ischemia and avoid multiple open surgeries. The aim of this article is to discuss the management of aortic diseases in CTD, focusing on to the role of standard open surgery and emerging endovascular treatment, and to give an overview of the few series published regarding this topic with a small number of patients.

Outcomes of Reoperation After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Implications for Index Repair Strategy

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for management of acute type A aortic dissection remains controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of reoperation after acute type A dissection repair to help guide decision making around index operative strategy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All aortic reoperations (n=129) at a single referral institution from August 2005 to April 2016 after prior acute type A dissection repair were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ-specific morbidity and 1- and 5-year outcomes as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The majority of initial reoperations were proximal aortic (aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending) or aortic arch procedures (62.5%, n=55); most initial reoperations were performed in the elective setting (83.1%, n=74). Additional nonstaged second or more reoperations were required in 21 patients (23.6%) after the initial reoperation, during a median follow-up of 2.5 years after the initial reoperation. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality for all reoperations was 7.0% (elective: 6.3%; nonelective: 11.1%) with acceptable rates of organ-specific morbidity, given the procedural complexity. One- and 5-year overall survival after initial reoperation was 85.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with aorta-specific survival of 88% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation after acute type A aortic dissection repair is associated with low rates of mortality and morbidity. These data support more limited index repair for acute type A dissection, especially for patients undergoing index repair in lower volume centers without expertise in extensive repair, because reoperations, if needed, can be performed safely in referral aortic centers.

International Registry of Patients Carrying TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 Mutations: Results of the MAC (Montalcino Aortic Consortium)

BACKGROUND

The natural history of aortic diseases in patients with TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 mutations reported by different investigators has varied greatly. In particular, the current recommendations for the timing of surgical repair of the aortic root aneurysms may be overly aggressive.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Montalcino Aortic Consortium, which includes 15 centers worldwide that specialize in heritable thoracic aortic diseases, was used to gather data on 441 patients from 228 families, with 176 cases harboring a mutation in TGBR1 and 265 in TGFBR2. Patients harboring a TGFBR1 mutation have similar survival rates (80% survival at 60 years), aortic risk (23% aortic dissection and 18% preventive aortic surgery), and prevalence of extra-aortic features (29% hypertelorism, 53% cervical arterial tortuosity, and 27% wide scars) when compared with patients harboring a TGFBR2 mutation. However, TGFBR1 males had a greater aortic risk than females, whereas TGFBR2 males and females had a similar aortic risk. Additionally, aortic root diameter prior to or at the time of type A aortic dissection tended to be smaller in patients carrying a TGFBR2 mutation and was ≤45 mm in 6 women with TGFBR2 mutations, presenting with marked systemic features and low body surface area. Aortic dissection was observed in 1.6% of pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 mutations show the same prevalence of systemic features and the same global survival. Preventive aortic surgery at a diameter of 45 mm, lowered toward 40 in females with low body surface area, TGFBR2 mutation, and severe extra-aortic features may be considered.

Surgical Management of Peripheral Vascular Manifestations of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is characterized by a triad of aortic aneurysm, vessel tortuosity, and hypertelorism. LDS patients often harbor additional aneurysms and dissections throughout their vasculature. The optimal management of these additional lesions is poorly understood. Accordingly, we sought to analyze our experience with the peripheral arterial manifestations of LDS.

METHODS

Adult and pediatric LDS patients who sought treatment at a single institution from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if radiographic or clinically documented evidence existed of peripheral artery aneurysm or dissection. Standard univariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen LDS patients (aged 1.3-59.3 years, mean age 27.8 years at diagnosis) with aortic (not including root, ascending, or arch) vascular abnormalities were identified. Average follow-up was 5.2 ± 3.8 years. Fourteen (77.8%) patients had peripheral aneurysms, occurring most frequently in the carotid (35.7%), subclavian (35.7%), and visceral (28.6%) segments. Most patients had multiple peripheral segments involved (average 2, range 1-6). Nine (64%) patients with peripheral involvement underwent repair, for a total of 17 operations (average 1.89 operations per patient, range 1-4). Endovascular techniques were used in 4 operations (23.5%), without technical failures. Among patients requiring surgical repair, a history of abdominal aortic repairs was present in 77.8%, yielding a total of 36 vascular repairs (average 4, range 2-7). Perioperative morbidity was 11.8%, with no reported mortalities. Prior aortic dissection was not associated with peripheral surgical repairs (P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

LDS is an aggressive vasculopathy which commonly affects the peripheral vasculature. Our data suggest that open and endovascular procedures may be safe and effective in the LDS periphery and multiple operations are common. As prior aortic dissection did not predict peripheral arterial involvement in LDS, vigilant peripheral arterial surveillance of LDS is warranted regardless of aortic disease state and may be key to early identification and our treatment success.

Evolving practice pattern changes and outcomes in the era of hybrid aortic arch repair

OBJECTIVE

The role of hybrid repair in the management of aortic arch pathology, and long-term outcomes with these techniques, remains uncertain. We report a decade of experience with hybrid arch repair (HAR) and assess institutional practice patterns with regard to the use of hybrid and open techniques.

METHODS

Hybrid and open total and distal arch procedures performed between July 2005 and January 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained, institutional aortic surgery database. Perioperative morbidity and mortality, freedom from reintervention, and long-term survival were calculated. Hybrid and open procedural volumes over the study period were assessed to evaluate for potential practice pattern changes.

RESULTS

During the study period 148 consecutive procedures were performed for repair of transverse and distal aortic arch pathology, including 101 hybrid repairs and 47 open total or distal arch repairs. Patients in the hybrid repair group were significantly older with a greater incidence of chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic lung disease. Perioperative mortality and outcomes were not significantly different between the hybrid and open groups, aside from decreased median length of stay after hybrid repair. Need for subsequent reintervention was significantly greater after hybrid repair. Unadjusted long-term survival was superior after open repair (70% 5-year survival open vs 47% hybrid; P = .03), although aorta-specific survival was similar (98% 5-year aorta-specific survival open vs 93% hybrid; P = .59). Institutional use of HAR decreased over the final 3 years of the study, with an associated increased use of open total or distal arch repairs. This was primarily the result of decreased use of native zone 0 hybrid procedures. Concurrent with this apparent increased stringency around patient selection for HAR, perioperative morbidity and mortality was reduced, including avoidance of retrograde type A dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

HAR remains a viable option for higher-risk patients with transverse arch pathology with perioperative outcomes and long-term aorta-specific survival similar to open repair, albeit at a cost of increased reintervention. This observational single-institution study would suggest decreased use in more recent years in favor of open repair due to avoidance of native zone 0 hybrid procedures. This decline in the institutional use of native zone 0 hybrid repairs was associated with improved perioperative outcomes.