Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Patients After Resection for Esophageal Cancer

Nomogram incorporating log odds of positive lymph nodes improves prognostic prediction for ovarian serous carcinoma: a real-world retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) is a major cause of gynaecological cancer death, yet there is a lack of reliable prognostic models. To address this, we developed and validated a nomogram based on conventional clinical characteristics and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) to predict the prognosis of OSC patients.

SETTING

A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme.

PARTICIPANTS

We obtained data on 4192 patients diagnosed with OSC between 2010 and 2015. Eligibility criteria included specific diagnostic codes, OSC being the primary malignant tumour and age at diagnosis over 18 years. Exclusion criteria were missing information on various factors and unknown cause of death or survival time.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS).

RESULTS

For OS and OCSS outcomes, we selected 7 and 5 variables, respectively, to establish the nomogram. In the training and validation cohorts, the C index for OS or OCSS was 0.716 or 0.718 and 0.731 or 0.733, respectively, with a 3-year time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745 or 0.751 and a 5-year time-dependent AUC of 0.742 or 0.751. Calibration curves demonstrated excellent consistency between predicted and observed outcomes. The Net Reclassification Index, integrated discrimination improvement and decision curve analysis curves indicated that our nomogram performed better than the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system in predicting OS and OCSS for OSC patients in both the training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our nomogram, which includes LODDS, offers higher accuracy and reliability than the FIGO staging system and can predict overall and OCSS in OSC patients.

Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Directly applying the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system to evaluate the prognosis of patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG) might lead to under-staging, when insufficient lymph nodes were retrieved during surgery. The prognostic value of 4 lymph nodes staging systems, 8th AJCC TNM N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and negative lymph nodes (NLN), in AEG patients having ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes were compared.

METHODS

869 AEG patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the association of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with 8th AJCC TNM N stage, LNR, LODDS, and NLN respectively. Predictive survival ability was assessed and compared using linear trend χ2 score, likelihood ratio (LR) test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Harrell concordance index (C-index), and Receiver Operative Curve (ROC).

RESULTS

The N stage, LNR, LODDS, and NLN were all independent prognostic predictors for CSS and OS in multivariate Cox models. Comparatively, LODDS demonstrated higher linear trend χ2 score, LR test score, C-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) value, and lower AIC in CSS compared to the other three systems. Moreover, for patients without regional lymph node metastasis, NLN showed higher C-index and lower AIC.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS showed better predictive performance than N, LNR, and NLN among patients with node-positive patients while NLN performed better in node-negative patients. A combination of LODDS and NLN has the potential to provide more prognostic information than the current AJCC TNM classification.

N, LNR or LODDS: Which Is the Most Appropriate Lymph Node Classification Scheme for Patients with Radically Resected Pancreatic Cancer?

Simple Summary

To date, no data are available regarding the most appropriate alternative LN classification system with respect to prognostic power and discriminative ability in cases with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We compared different lymph node classification systems with regard to accurate evaluation of overall survival in 319 patients with resected PDAC. One LNR and one LODDS classification scheme were found to out-perform the N category in distinct patient subgroups. Only the LODDS classification exhibited statistically significant, gradually increasing HRs of their subcategories and, at the same time, significantly better discriminative potential in the subgroups of patients with PDAC of the head or corpus and in patients with tumor-free resection margins or M0 status, respectively.

Abstract

Background: Even though numerous novel lymph node (LN) classification schemes exist, an extensive comparison of their performance in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not yet been performed. Method: We investigated the prognostic performance and discriminative ability of 25 different LN ratio (LNR) and 27 log odds of metastatic LN (LODDS) classifications by means of Cox regression and C-statistic in 319 patients with resected PDAC. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, T category, grading, localization, presence of metastatic disease, positivity of resection margins, and neoadjuvant therapy. Results: Both LNR or LODDS as continuous variables were associated with advanced tumor stage, distant metastasis, positive resection margins, and PDAC of the head or corpus. Two distinct LN classifications, one LODDS and one LNR, were found to be superior to the N category in the complete patient collective. However, only the LODDS classification exhibited statistically significant, gradually increasing HRs of their subcategories and at the same time significantly higher discriminative potential in the subgroups of patients with PDAC of the head or corpus and in patients with tumor free resection margins or M0 status, respectively. On this basis, we built a clinically helpful nomogram to estimate the prognosis of patients after radically resected PDAC. Conclusion: One LNR and one LODDS classification scheme were found to out-perform the N category in terms of both prognostic performance and discriminative ability, in distinct patient subgroups, with reference to OS in patients with resected PDAC.

Prognostic Performance of Alternative Lymph Node Classification Systems for Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Single Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR) and the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) have been proposed as alternative lymph node (LN) classification schemes. Various cut-off values have been defined for each system, with the question of the most appropriate for patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) still remaining open. We aimed to retrospectively compare the predictive impact of different LN classification systems and to define the most appropriate set of cut-off values regarding accurate evaluation of overall survival (OS) in patients with MTC.

METHODS

182 patients with MTC who were operated on between 1985 and 2018 were extracted from our medical database. Cox proportional hazards regression models and C-statistics were performed to assess the discriminative power of 28 LNR and 28 LODDS classifications and compare them with the N category according to the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM classification in terms of discriminative power. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, T category, focality, and genetic predisposition.

RESULTS

High LNR and LODDS are associated with advanced T categories, distant metastasis, sporadic disease, and male gender. In addition, among 56 alternative LN classifications, only one LNR and one LODDS classification were independently associated with OS, regardless of the presence of metastatic disease. The C-statistic demonstrated comparable results for all classification systems showing no clear superiority over the N category.

CONCLUSION

Two distinct alternative LN classification systems demonstrated a better prognostic performance in MTC patients than the N category. However, larger scale studies are needed to further verify our findings.

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value of lymph node classifications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large real-world multicenter study

Background:

We aim to assess the prognostic ability of three common lymph node–based staging algorithms, namely, the number of positive lymph nodes (pN), the lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods:

A total of 3902 ESCC patients treated at 10 Chinese institutions between 2003 and 2013 were included, along with 2465 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The prognostic ability of the aforementioned algorithms was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) curves, R², Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), and the likelihood ratio chi-square score. The primary outcomes included cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and CSS with a competing risk of death by non-ESCC causes.

Results:

LODDS had better prognostic performance than pN or LNR in both continuous and stratified patterns. In the multicenter cohort, the multivariate analysis showed that the model based on LODDS classification was superior to the others in predictive accuracy and discriminatory capacity. Two nomograms integrating LODDS classification and other clinicopathological risk factors associated with OS as well as cancer-specific mortality were constructed and validated in the SEER database. Finally, a novel TN_LODDS classification which incorporates the LODDS classification was built and categorized patients in to three new stages.

Conclusion:

Among the three lymph node–based staging algorithms, LODDS demonstrated the highest discriminative capacity and prognostic accuracy for ESCC patients. The nomograms and novel TN_LODDS classification based on LODDS classification could serve as precise evaluation tools to assist clinicians in estimating the survival time of individual patients and improving clinical outcomes postoperatively in the future.

Lymph Node Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: Results from a 10-Year Follow-up Study

PURPOSE

Emerging evidences suggest that lymph node ratio (LNR), the number of metastatic lymph node (LN) to the total number of dissected lymph nodes (NDLN), may predict survival in multiple types of solid tumor. However, the prognostic role of LNR in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains uninvestigated. The present study is intended to determine the prognostic value of LNR in the patients with Siewert type II AEG.

METHODS

A total of 342 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent R0 resection were enrolled in this study. The optimal cutoff of LNR was stratified into tertiles using X-tile software. The log-rank test was used to evaluate the survival differences, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent prognostic variables.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff of LNR were classified as LNR = 0, LNR between 0.01 and 0.40, and LNR > 0.41. Patients with high LNR had a shorter 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (8.5%, 1.4%) compared with those with moderate LNR (20.4%, 4.9%) and low LNR (58.0%, 27.5%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that LNR was an independent factor for DSS after adjusting for confounding variables (P < 0.05). Furthermore, after stratification by NDLN between NDLN < 15 group and NDLN ≥ 15 group, the LNR remained a significant predictor for DSS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LNR is an independent predictor for DSS in patients with Siewert type II AEG regardless of NDLN. Patients with higher LNR have significantly shorter DSS.

Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods for node-positive cardia gastric cancer: a register-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in node-positive cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA).

DESIGN

A registry-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Patients diagnosed with node-positive CGA in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1038 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (7:3) to the training set (n=723) or validating set (n=315).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the training and validation sets were similar. Based on the optimal cut-off values, LNR was classified into low (<0.09), medium (0.09~0.33) and high (>0.33) groups; LODDS was also classified into low (<-2.09), medium (-2.09~-0.65) and high (>-0.65) groups. CSS was significantly different across LNR and LODDS subgroups. The Harrell concordance index of the N stage was lower than that of the LNR or LODDS. The Akaike information criterion of the N stage was higher than that of the LNR or LODDS. Independent predictors included race, T stage, M stage and LNR (or LODDS), and they were incorporated into nomograms for 1-year, 2-year and 5-year CSS prediction. Calibration plots showed satisfactory results for internal and external validity of the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR and LODDS staging methods have better prognostic efficacy than the traditional N staging method in CGA with node metastasis. Moreover, the two values are promising substitutes for N staging in nomogram development when other independent prognostic factors are incorporated.

Prognostic Discrimination of Alternative Lymph Node Classification Systems for Patients with Radically Resected Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Cohort Study from a Single Tertiary Referral Center

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR) and the Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) have been proposed as a new prognostic indicator in surgical oncology. Various studies have shown a superior discriminating power of LODDS over LNR and lymph node category (N) in diverse cancer entities, when examined as a continuous variable. However, for each of the classification systems various cut-off values have been defined, with the question of the most appropriate for patients with CRC still remaining open. The present study aimed to compare the predictive impact of different lymph node classification systems and to define the best cut-off values regarding accurate evaluation of overall survival in patients with resectable, non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

CRC patients who underwent surgical resection from 1996 to 2018 were extracted from our medical data base. Cox proportional hazards regression models and C-statistics were performed to assess the discriminative power of 25 LNR and 26 LODDS classifications. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, extent of the tumor, differentiation, tumor size and localization.

RESULTS

Our study group consisted of 654 consecutive patients with non-metastatic CRC. C-statistic revealed 2 LNR and 5 LODDS classifications that demonstrated superior prognostic performance in patients with UICC III CRC, compared to the N category. No clear advantage of one classification over another could be demonstrated in any other patient subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct LNR and LODDS classifications demonstrate a prognostic superiority over the N category only in patients with Stage III radically resected CRC.

Prognostic Nomograms Based on Three Lymph Node Classification Systems for Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study and External Validation

BACKGROUNDS

The optimal lymph node classification system for prognostic assessment in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients who undergo lymph node dissection remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare prognostic nomograms based on AJCC N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) to evaluate the prognosis and differentiate risk subgroups of patients with resected GAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected 4633 patients with resected stage I-III GAC receiving chemotherapy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Independent prognostic factors were selected by Cox regression analyses, based on which nomograms were constructed. External validation was performed in 228 cases from Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for different lymph node classifications.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis indicated that age, grade, primary site, T stage, N stage, LNR, LODDS, and radiotherapy were independent predictors. Good discrimination power and high consistency of calibration plots were obtained from the LODDS system nomogram. The LODDS classification could more precisely differentiate risk subgroups and improve the discrimination of the resected GAC prognosis. A user-friendly webserver of LODDS system was built based on the nomogram for convenient clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

The LODDS seems to be the most reliable lymph node classification in predicting the prognosis of patients with resected GAC and should be recommended in clinical prognostic assessment. Incorporating LODDS into the staging system will enable clinicians to more accurately predict prognosis and guide radiotherapy regimen decisions.

The prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population study of the US SEER database and a Chinese single-institution cohort

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) value compared with the pathological N stage and lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Method

In total 1144 patients diagnosed with ESCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 930 patients from our validation cohort were eligible. Kaplan–Meier plotter and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to investigate the prognostic value of the N stage, LNR stage, and LODDS stage. The homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of these variables were evaluated using the linear trend χ² test, likelihood ratio χ² test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and consistency index (C‐index) to determine the potential superiorities.

Results

The prognostic LODDS cutoff values were determined to be −1.49 and −0.55 (p < 0.001). Univariate analyses showed significant association among the N, LNR, and LODDS stages and overall survival of the patients (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed that the LODDS stage remained an independent prognostic indicator in both the SEER database and our validation cohort. Subgroup analyses identified the ability of LODDS stage to distinguish heterogeneous patients within various groups in both independent databases. Furthermore, the model with the highest C‐index and smallest AIC value was the one incorporating the LODDS stage among the three investigated nodal classifications of both cohorts.

Conclusion

The novel LODDS stage demonstrated better prognostic performance than the traditional N or LNR stages in ESCC patients. It can serve as an auxiliary factor to improve prognostic performance and can be applied to evaluate the lymph node status to increase the precision of staging and evaluation of survival.

A novel nomogram with preferable capability in predicting the overall survival of patients after radical esophageal cancer resection based on accessible clinical indicators: A comparison with AJCC staging

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a malignant tumor with high mortality. Nomogram is an important tool used in clinical prognostic assessment. We aimed to establish a novel nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of EC patients after radical esophagectomy.

METHODS

Data pertaining to the survival, demography, and clinicopathology of 311 EC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy were retrospectively investigated. The nomogram was established based on Cox hazard regression analysis. The calibration curves and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) were used to verify the predictive accuracy and ROC curves were used to assess the efficacy of the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier curves showed the prognostic value of the related risk classification system. Pearson correlation test was performed to determine the correlation between the risk classification system and TNM staging.

RESULTS

The median OS and 5-year survival rates in the primary and validation cohorts were 44 months and 29.8%, and 52 months and 27.1%, respectively. We used six independent prognostic factors-age, Sex, AGR, PRL, N stage, and PNI-in the nomogram. The C-index of nomogram was 0.75 and 0.70 in the primary and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves indicated high consistency between actual and predicted OS. ROC curves showed that nomogram has a better efficacy compared with TNM staging in both cohorts. Patients were divided into three risk groups according to the total nomogram score, the median OS in each group was significantly different in both cohorts. Furthermore, the risk classification system was strongly correlated with the T and N staging system and exhibited a better OS prediction capability.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a novel and practical nomogram with a subordinate risk classification system to predict the OS of patients after radical esophagectomy. Compared with AJCC staging, this nomogram had preferable clinical capability in terms of individual prognosis assessment.

The Prognostic Value of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Study Based on the SEER Database and a Chinese Cohort

Objective

Early detection and timely treatment are important for improving the prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC). Identification of the prognostic risk factors could help us to discern the high-risk population. This study was aimed at exploring the prognostic significance of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in early-stage EC patients.

Methods

Patients who underwent esophagectomy and diagnosed as pathologic T1-2 N0 EC were reviewed between January 2005 and December 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (the development cohort, n = 1004). The X-tile software was used to determine the optimal cutoff values of LODDS. A separate Chinese cohort including 245 patients (the validation cohort) was used to externally validate the results of the SEER database.

Result

Patients were divided into two groups based on the cutoff points of LODDS: <-1.40 (LODDS1) and ≥-1.40 (LODDS2). In the development cohort, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 75.3% for patients in the LODDS1 group, compared with 67.5% for those in the LODDS2 group (P=0.002). In multivariate Cox analysis, LODDS was associated with OS significantly (hazard ratio (HR), 1.48; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.19-1.85). In the validation cohort, the 5-year OS rate was 76.6% for patients in the LODDS1 group, compared with 64.4% for those in the LODDS2 group (P=0.006). The HR value in multivariate Cox analysis for OS was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.26-3.18).

Conclusion

LODDS was an important independent factor for survival in early-stage EC patients.

Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell carcinoma is a rare type of oesophageal cancer, and we hypothesized that log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma.

AIM

To explore a novel prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma by comparing two lymph node-related prognostic factors, log odds of positive LODDS and N stage.

METHODS

A total of 259 cases of oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma after oesopha-gectomy were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2006 and 2016. The prognostic value of LODDS and N stage for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s C-index were used to assess the value of two prediction models based on lymph nodes. External validation was performed to further confirm the conclusion.

RESULTS

The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of all the cases were 41.3% and 27.0%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method showed that LODDS had a higher score of log rank chi-squared (OS: 46.162, CSS: 41.178) than N stage (OS: 36.215, CSS: 31.583). Univariate analyses showed that insurance, race, T stage, M stage, TNM stage, radiation therapy, N stage, and LODDS were potential prognostic factors for OS (P < 0.1). The multivariate Cox regression model showed that LODDS was an significant independent prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring carcinoma patients after surgical resection (P < 0.05), while N stage was not considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.122). Model 2 (LODDS) had a higher degree of discrimination and fit than Model 1 (N stage) (LODDS vs N stage, Harell’s C-index 0.673 vs 0.656, P < 0.001; Akaike information criterion 1688.824 vs 1697.519, P < 0.001). The results of external validation were consistent with those in the study cohort.

CONCLUSION

LODDS is a superior prognostic factor to N stage for patients with oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma after oesophagectomy.

Ratio between negative and positive lymph nodes is a novel prognostic indicator for patients with esophageal cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to explore whether the ratio between negative and positive lymph nodes (R_NP) could predict the overall survival (OS) of esophageal cancer (EC) patients with lymph node metastasis following esophagectomy.

Methods

We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to include the records of 2374 patients with lymph node metastases post‐surgery. All patients were randomly assigned into the training cohort (n = 1424) and validation cohort (n = 950). Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. A novel R_NP ‐based TR_NPM staging system was proposed. The prognostic value of N, R_NP, TNM and TR_NPM staging system was evaluated using the linear trend χ² test, likelihood ratio χ² test, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) to determine the potential superiorities. We constructed nomograms to predict survival in both cohorts, and the calibration curves confirmed the predictive ability.

Results

Univariate analyses showed that N and R_NP stage significantly influenced the OS of patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that R_NP was an independent prognostic predictor in both the training and validation cohorts. For the stratification analysis in the two cohorts, we found significant differences in the prognosis of patients in different R_NP groups on the basis of the different N stages and the number of dissected lymph nodes. In addition, the lower AIC value of R_NP stage and TR_NPM staging system represented superior predictive accuracy for OS than the N stage and TNM staging system, respectively. Furthermore, the calibration curves for the probability of three‐ and five‐year survival showed good consistency between nomogram predictive abilities and actual observation.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that compared to the classical pathological lymph nodal staging system, the R_NP stage showed superior predictive accuracy for OS and can serve as a more effective prognostic guidance for lymph node positive EC patients.

Log odds of positive lymph nodes predicts survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in survival prediction of patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant therapy, compared with N descriptor and positive lymph node ratio (LNR).

METHODS

Patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant therapy from 2004 to 2015 were reviewed in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The receiver operating characteristics curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare discriminatory power among N descriptor, LNR, and LODDS. The goodness of fit was measured using the -2 log-likelihood ratio (-2LLR).

RESULTS

About 2239 patients with a 22 months median follow-up and a 37.8% 5-year overall survival rate were included. LODDS had the best discriminatory power and goodness of fit (LODDS vs N descriptor, AUC 0.666 vs 0.626, -2LLR 15 680.402 vs 15 746.162; LODDS vs LNR, AUC 0.666 vs 0.635, -2LLR 15 680.402 vs 15 712.379; all P < .001). LODDS was the best for fewer than 15 lymph nodes retrieved (LODDS vs N descriptor, AUC 0.652 vs 0.618, P < .001; LODDS vs LNR, AUC 0.652 vs 0.625, P = .005). The prognosis of patients without metastatic nodes could be discriminated by LODDS.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS could better predict survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Epidemiological Study of Uveal Melanoma from US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2010-2015)

Purpose

Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy, and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) changed its staging methodology from 2010, incorporating notable changes into the T-staging. There were few literatures evaluating the epidemiological trend and risk factors of survival in multicenter longitudinal studies regarding the new staging system.

Methods

We performed population-based cohort analyses using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients with primary uveal melanoma from 2010 to 2015. Patients and potential prognosis indicators were extracted from SEER 18. Incidence rates, incidence rates ratios (IRR), annual percent changes (APC) in rate, hazard ratios (HR), 5-year accumulative overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated.

Results

A total of 2631 patients for incidence analysis and 1142 patients for survival analysis were retrieved. The overall incidence of uveal melanoma was 4.637 per million (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.458–4.821), which was significantly elevated by average APC of 4.215% (p = 0.03). Females had significantly lower incidence (4.076 per million, IRR, 0.768, 95% CI, 0.710–0.832) with noticeable differences among age, race, origin, and laterality in sex-stratified analyses as well. Survival analyses revealed 5-year accumulative OS and DSS for patients with uveal melanoma of 61.8% and 66.5%, respectively. Age, AJCC stage, and radiation therapy were found to be consistent predictors in both univariate and multivariate analysis models.

Conclusion

Incidence of uveal melanoma increased by significant APC and varied between genders. Determinants of survival included age at diagnosis, AJCC stage, and radiation therapy.

How many lymph nodes should be dissected in esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant therapy to get accurate staging?

It is essential to dissect an adequate number of lymph nodes (LNs) to ensure staging accuracy during esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant therapy. We developed a statistical model to quantify the probability of precise nodal staging based on previous studies. Esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A β-binomial distribution was adopted to estimate the number of understaged patients based on the numbers of positive and examined LNs. Using 6,252 patients, we estimated a 90% confidence of accurate N0 staging could be achieved by examining 17 LNs without neoadjuvant therapy. To obtain similar accuracy in N1 and N2, 20 and 25 LNs should be examined. For patients with neoadjuvant therapy, 18, 19, and 28 LNs could achieve the same accuracy. Staging accuracy was a significant prognostic factor. We found when 90% confidence had been achieved, patient survival did not improve with more LNs examined and the ratio and log odds of positive LNs did not have significant prognostic values. The statistical model we developed for precise staging in patients with different N stages is of great value in guiding lymphadenectomy. It provided risk assessment for underestimated LN metastases and guided subsequent adjuvant treatment.

Prognostic Performance of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems in Patients With Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: The prognostic significance of the lymph node (LN) classification for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic assessment of different LN staging systems. Methods: Patients with SBNETs were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The X-tile program was used to determine the cutoff value of the resected lymph nodes (RLNs), negative lymph nodes (NLNs), lymph node ratio (LNR), and the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences between different periods. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic value of different LN staging systems on cause-specific survival (CSS). The relative discriminative abilities of the different LN staging systems were assessed using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Harrell consistency index (HCI). Result: A total of 3,680 patients were diagnosed with SBNETs between 1988 and 2014 from the SEER database. A significant difference over time (1988-1999 vs. 2000-2014) was seen in age (P <0.001), tumor differentiation (P <0.001), T stage (P <0.001), and RLN (P <0.001) subgroups. Multivariate Cox survival analysis identified that LN status stratified by the number of RLNs, NLNs, LNR, and LODDS all predicted CSS in patients with SBNETs (all P <0.05), whereas the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) failed (P = 0.452). When assessed using categorical variables, LODDS staging systems showed the best prognostic performance (HCI: 0.766, AIC: 7,575.154) in the whole population. Further analysis based on different RLNs after eliminating the missing data showed that when the RLNs are <12, the LODDS (HCI: 0.769, AIC: 1,088.731) maintained the best prognostic performance as well when the RLNs are ≥12 (HCI: 0.835, AIC: 825.692). Among patients with LNR scores of 0 or 1, there was a residual heterogeneity of outcomes that were better stratified and characterized by the LODDS. Conclusion: LODDS was a better predicator of survival when LN status was stratified as a categorical variable and should be considered when assessing the prognosis of patients with SBNETs to allow a more reliable means to stratify patient survival.

Prognostic nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for gastric carcinoma patients after surgical resection

Aim: To build a prognostic nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with gastric carcinoma (GC) after resection, and to compare the predictive performance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system and lymph node ratio (LNR). Methods: Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent variables for cancer-specific survival (CSS). A nomogram was constructed based on independent clinicopathological factors. Results: The C-indices for predicting CSS were 0.674 in development cohort and 0.647 in validation cohort, which were higher than that of the AJCC staging system and LNR. Conclusion: The nomogram was more accurate than the AJCC staging system and LNR for predicting CSS in patients undergoing resection for GC.

Isolation of circulating tumor cells in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer and a specific confirmation method

The clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have undergone radical surgery was investigated. A novel confirmation method for identifying CTCs or circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) in ESCC was also investigated. Blood samples from 55 patients with ESCC were collected 1–3 days prior to surgery and 7 days post-surgery. All patients underwent curative thoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy. Blood samples from 20 healthy volunteers were obtained as controls. Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET) was performed also. The overall CTC detection rate was 52.7% preoperatively and 49.1% postoperatively. The presence of CTCs correlated with the Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage and the Log odds of positive lymph nodes. No significant difference in perioperative CTC transformation was discovered between the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach, and the open approach. The P40⁺/cluster of differentiation (CD)45⁻ phenotype was confirmed in the CTCs and CTM. ISET appeared to have high sensitivity for detecting CTCs within ESCC patients. Immunofluorescence staining for CD45 and P40 was a specific, accurate and convenient method for confirming the presence of CTCs or CTM in patients with ESCC, and is strongly recommended as a supplement to morphological analysis.

Prognostic performance of three lymph node staging schemes for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction

The prognostic performance of different lymph node staging schemes for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to compare the prognostic efficacy of the number of lymph node metastases (LNMs), the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). Patients diagnosed with Siewert type II AEG were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Harrell's C-index statistic, Schemper's proportion of explained variation (PEV), the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and restricted cubic spine analyses were adopted to assess the predictive accuracy of LNM, LNR and LODDS. A total of 1302 patients with post-surgery Siewert type II AEG were included. LNM, LNR and LODDS all showed significant prognostic value in the multivariate Cox regression analyses. LODDS performed higher predictive accuracy than LNM and LNR, with relatively higher C-index, higher Schemper's PEV value and lower AIC value. For patients with no nodes involved, LODDS still performed significantly discriminatory utility. LODDS showed more accurate prognostic performance than LNM and LNR for post-surgery Siewert type II AEG, and it could help to detect survival heterogeneity for patients with no positive lymph nodes involved.

Pathologic lymph node ratio is a predictor of esophageal carcinoma patient survival: a literature-based pooled analysis

The positive lymph node ratio (LNR) has been suggested as a predictor of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). However, existed evidences did not completely agree with each other. We sought to examine whether LNR was associated with overall survival (OS). Electronic database was searched for eligible literatures. The primary outcome was the relationship between LNR and OS, which was presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 11.0 software. A total of 18 relevant studies which involved 7,664 cases were included. Patients with an LNR of 0.3 or greater had an increased risk of death compared to those with an LNR of less than 0.3(HR = 2.33; 95% CI 2.03-2.68; P<0.01). Similarly, patients with an LNR greater than 0.5 was also associated with a decreased OS(HR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.52-2.50; P<0.01). No publication bias was found. This meta-analysis confirmed that LNR was a significant predictor of survival in patients with EC and should be considered in prognostication.