Outcomes of Trainees Performing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Does Resident Experience Matter?

Operative Teaching of Coronary Bypass and Need for Repeat Catheterization: Does it Matter Who is Sewing?

OBJECTIVE

There are no studies to date comparing the patency of coronary bypass grafts constructed by attending surgeons versus trainees and the potential consequences of any such disparities. We explored this issue by comparing the patency of individual anastomoses performed by residents versus the attending surgeon.

DESIGN

We reviewed 765 continuous cases performed by a single surgeon which involved at least 1 coronary bypass anastomosis, totaling 2,173 distal anastomoses. At a median follow-up time of 36 months (interquartile range 20.5-47.3), 83 (10.9%) patients had undergone 110 cardiac catheterization procedures after their original operation for various indications. This angiographic information provided the data for our comparison cohorts.

SETTING

Cardiac surgery practice within an academic setting PARTICIPANTS: Adult patient undergoing coronary bypass grafting RESULTS: Of the 83 patients that underwent repeat catheterization, 23 (27.7%) were resident cases, 25 (30.1%) were attending cases and 35 (42.2%) were mixed. There were 4/83 (4.8%) patients with angiographic evidence of internal mammary artery graft compromise of which 3/4 (75%) had been constructed by the attending surgeon. Angiographic evidence of saphenous vein graft compromise was appreciated in 16/83 (19.3%) patients of which 9/16 (56.3%) of the grafts were constructed by the attending surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Liberal involvement of surgical trainees as primary operators in coronary revascularization cases led to equivalent rates of postoperative ischemic complications between the attending and resident groups. The outcome equivalence was also maintained when evaluated at the individual anastomosis patency level between the 2 groups. We conclude that academic programs should continue providing trainees significant experience as primary operating surgeons without fear of clinical outcome compromise.

Resident education in congenital heart surgery does not compromise outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Most of all congenital cardiac surgical programs participate in public outcomes reporting. The primary end point is transparency. In this era, academic programs with surgical residents face the challenge of producing outstanding results while allowing residents to learn by doing. We sought to understand the effect of education on our surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We collected data for all American Board of Thoracic Surgery index cases done at our institution over a 10-year period. We identified 3406 cases and categorized them into 2 groups according to primary surgeon: attending (2269) versus resident (1137). In a multivariable logistic regression model we examined the effect of operating surgeon on in-hospital mortality, major morbidity, and length of stay. We used propensity score matching subsequently to balance differences between cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression was repeated.

RESULTS

Using the entire cohort, multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, weight, lack of preoperative comorbidity, presence of preoperative respiratory failure, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons--European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category, and need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, showed a higher odds of survival in the resident cohort (odds ratio, 1.484; 95% confidence interval, 0.998-2.206; P = .05). Propensity score matching identified 1137 pairs of attending and resident cases with well-balanced preoperative variables. Logistic regression modeling using the matched cohort showed equivalent 30-day mortality, 30-day major morbidity, and length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in mortality, major morbidity, or length of stay when similar cases were compared that were operated on by attendings versus those by a resident. Effectively educating congenital heart surgeons without compromising an operation's quality requires thoughtful approach, including case selection and graded responsibility.

Training for Multiple Arterial Grafting: A Thoracic Surgery Resident Survey

BACKGROUND

Utilization of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) in the United States is less than 10%. Trainee experience with MAG has not previously been examined.

METHODS

A total of 497 thoracic surgery residents in accredited training programs in March 2019 and 115 who completed residency in 2018 were electronically surveyed regarding their experience with MAG using a radial artery (RA) graft or bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafts with a skeletonized mammary (SM).

RESULTS

Eighty-four (14%) trainees responded: 54% had completed 2+ years of training and 87% declared their focus as cardiac, undecided, or both cardiac and thoracic (CUB). Of all 84 respondents, 76% (n = 64 of 84) had no experience with RA harvest. A total of 35% (n = 29 of 84) had no experience with SM harvest. The majority, 68% (n = 57 of 84), used BIMA grafting in 0% to 5% of cases. A total of 61% (n = 51 of 84) used RA conduit in 0% to 5% of cases. Among trainees with 2+ years of experience, 56% (n = 25 of 45) had performed more than 6 SM takedowns, 18% (n = 8 of 45) had no experience. In trainees with 2+ years, 20% (n = 9 of 45) performed more than 5 RA harvests, while 80% (n = 36 of 45) had no experience. Examining integrated 6-year residents with greater than 3 years of experience, only 33% (n = 5 of 15) performed more than 5% RA grafting. A total of 90% of CUB trainees wanted to perform MAG in practice and 75% felt prepared to do so.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial variation in MAG training, respondents expressed an overwhelming interest in performing MAG. These data and the reality of MAG utilization in the United States indicate that a more rigorous, standardized approach to MAG training may be required.

Absence of perioperative excessive bleeding in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting cases performed by residents

OBJECTIVES

On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with elevated bleeding risk. Our aim was to evaluate the role of surgical experience in postoperative blood loss.

METHODS

A propensity score-matched analysis was employed to compare on-pump CABG patients operated on by residents and specialists. End points included drainage volume and bleeding severity, as assessed by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding in cardiac surgery and E-CABG scale.

RESULTS

A total of 212 matched pairs (c-statistics 0.693) were selected from patients operated on by residents (n = 294) and specialists (n = 4394) between October 2012 and May 2018. Patients did not differ in bleeding risk. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative 6-, 12- and 24-h drainages between subjects operated on by residents and specialists, and there was no between-group difference in rethoracotomy or transfusion rate. There were no differences in Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding or E-CABG grades. In June 2018, after a median follow-up of 2.8 years (range 0.1-5.7 years), the overall survival was 94%, with no differences between the patients operated on by residents (95%) and specialists (92%) (P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing on-pump CABG, when operated on by a resident, are not exposed to an elevated bleeding risk, as compared with patients operated on by experienced surgeons.

Cardiothoracic Surgery Residency Training in Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

As no standardized curriculum exists for training cardiothoracic surgery residents in surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation there is potential for variation in operative technique, patient selection, and overall application. Thus we sought to assess the exposure of current residents in order to identify areas for improvement in their education.

Methods

A survey was emailed to residents inquiring about their training experience in surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Residents were asked about case volume, procedural variety, and guideline-based clinical scenarios where they felt ablation would be appropriate. Residents were also queried about their abilities to perform various lesion sets and overall satisfaction with training.

Results

The respondents performed a median of five cases during training with pulmonary vein isolation the most common lesion set. Seventy seven percent of residents are unable to independently perform a bi-atrial (Cox-Maze IV) lesion set. Residents are neutral regarding their satisfaction with training in surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Conclusions

The findings of low case volume, incomplete lesion set use, and lack of training satisfaction suggests residents are being insufficiently exposed to surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. These findings should inform educators on the importance of a more thorough experience during training given the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the need for appropriate and durable surgical intervention.

Total arterial revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction - feasibility and outcomes

BACKGROUND

In acute situations such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), total arterial revascularization (TAR) is often rejected in favour of saphenous vein (SV) grafting, which is assumed to allow for quicker vessel harvesting, a simpler anastomosis technique, and thus quicker revascularization and fewer bleeding complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether reluctance to apply TAR in AMI is still justified from a technical point of view in the current era and whether superiority of TAR results is also evident in emergency patients with AMI undergoing CABG.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of 434 consecutive patients undergoing CABG for AMI with either TAR or with a combination of one internal mammary artery and SV grafts between 2008 and 2014, procedural data, short-term and mid-term outcome were compared. Propensity score matching of the groups was performed.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 250 patients were included in the analysis (TAR group: n = 98; SV group n = 152). The procedural time (TAR group: 211 min vs. SV group: 200 min, p = 0.46) did not differ between the groups. Erythrocyte transfusion rates were higher in the SV group (76% vs. 57%; p < 0.001). Rates of re-exploration for bleeding did not differ. Thirty-day mortality rates were comparable (TAR group: 3.4% vs. SV group: 4.5%, p = 0.68). Kaplan-Meier analysis until 7 years postoperatively revealed a tendency for improved survival after TAR (75% vs. 62%; log-rank p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

TAR neither impairs rapid revascularization nor reduces its safety in patients with AMI. It may result in improved long-term outcome and should be preferred in the clinical setting of AMI.

Prognostic Impact of Prolonged Cross-Clamp Time in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of cross-clamp time (XCT) in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not been thoroughly investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

2957 patients who underwent on-pump isolated CABG from the prospective multicentre E-CABG study were the subjects of this analysis.

RESULTS

The mean XCT in this series was 58±25minutes Cross-clamp time was >60 minutes in 1134 patients (38.3%), >75minutes in 619 patients (20.9%) and >90minutes in 296 patients (10.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that XCT was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (p<0.0001, OR 1.027, 95%CI 1.015-1.039) along with age (p<0.0001), female gender (p=0.001), pulmonary disease (p=0.001), poor mobility (p=0.002), urgency status (p=0.007), critical preoperative status (p=0.002) and participating centres (p=0.015). Adjusted risk of 30-day mortality was highest for XCT >75minutes (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.002, OR 3.479, 95%CI 1.609-7.520). Analysis of 428 propensity score matched pairs showed that XCT >75minutes was associated with significantly increased risk of early mortality, prolonged use of inotropes, postoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, atrial fibrillation, prolonged stay in the intensive care unit and of composite major adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated CABG is currently performed with prolonged XCT in a significant number of patients and this seems to be a determinant of poor early outcome.