The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:329-341. [PMID: 28007240 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076]

Is it feasible to treat atrial fibrillation at the time of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the most common operation performed by cardiac surgeons. As a result, a cardiac surgeon with a typical practice will most commonly encounter atrial fibrillation when performing coronary artery bypass grafting. In this review, we first emphasize the importance of treating atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting. We review benefits of concomitant surgical ablation and its importance relative to complete coronary revascularization. We then discuss options to treat atrial fibrillation in a more minimally invasive manner in these patients, while still preserving treatment efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical ablation at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery could be as important as complete revascularization. Bi-atrial ablation provides superior rhythm control compared to left-sided ablation only.

SUMMARY

We highlight various options for surgical ablation at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, and provide an algorithm for ablation in individual patients.

Late Survival Benefits of Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation During Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The long-term survival benefits after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) during cardiac surgery were not confirmed in previous randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy of surgical ablation in patients with AF. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched to identify studies comparing concomitant surgical AF ablation with no surgical ablation during cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, heart failure rehospitalization, major bleeding, freedom from AF, and permanent pacemaker implantation during follow-up. To minimize confounding, only adjusted outcomes were used from observational studies. A total of 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 9 randomized controlled trials and 15 observational studies with 41,678 patients (surgical ablation: n = 19,125; no surgical ablation: n = 22,553) were analyzed for all-cause mortality, with a weighted median follow-up of 62.0 months. Surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 0.84), stroke (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76), heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96), and more freedom from AF during follow-up (relative risk 1.93, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.49), whereas surgical ablation was associated with a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation during follow-up (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.77). There was no significant difference in major bleeding during follow-up between the 2 groups. In patients with AF who underwent cardiac surgery, surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of long-term mortality, stroke, and heart failure rehospitalization compared with patients with untreated AF. Given that the survival benefits were predominantly observed in observational studies, further randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Atrial Fibrillation Surgery in Australia: Are We Doing Enough?

AIM

This study aimed to examine contemporary burden and treatment trends of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Australia and New Zealand. This allows comparison of contemporary practice with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons guideline recommendations for the surgical treatment of AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHOD

A 10-year retrospective review of the Australian & New Zealand Society of Cardiac & Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database was performed, examining all adult cardiac surgery patients from 2011 to 2021. Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of AF, and simple descriptive statistical analysis was performed to assess baseline demographics and premorbid condition of the patients. The incidence of AF was analysed by type of surgery. Trends for surgical treatment of AF were then analysed using simple descriptive statistics, examining isolated left atrial appendage ligation, isolated surgical ablation, and combined ligation and ablation.

RESULTS

In the last 10 years, the Australian & New Zealand Society of Cardiac & Thoracic Surgeons database has recorded 140,680 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 21,077 patients (14%). Patients with AF were generally older (72.25 vs 66.65 years; p<0.001). Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, AF was more common in female than in male patients (18% vs 13%, respectively). Patients with AF more often had a higher classification of dyspnoea according to the New York Heart Association and lower ejection fractions compared with their AF-free counterparts. The incidence of AF as a comorbid condition was more frequent in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery or combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery (aortic, mitral, or both) compared with those undergoing isolated coronary or aortic surgery. Only 11.90% (n=2,509) of patients with AF received a combined ablation and left atrial appendage ligation, and 19.54% (n=693) of those received a Cox-Maze IV ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of concomitant AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in Australia is higher than previously reported (14% vs 5%-11%). Despite strong recommendation for the surgical management of AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and clear evidence of its benefit, both left atrial appendage ligation and surgical ablation independently or concomitantly remain heavily underutilised in this cohort.

Impact of Preoperative Sinus Rhythm on Concomitant Surgical Ablation's One-Year Success in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Registry Cohort Study

Background: The surgical ablation (SA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) during cardiac surgery is performed in only 8-40% of patients. We performed a subgroup analysis of the 1-year follow-up from the German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) registry to determine how preoperative sinus rhythm (SR) prior to SA affected the outcomes. Methods: The CASE-AF registry enrolled AF patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with concomitant SA. The in-hospital and one-year follow-up data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Results: From September 2016 to August 2020, 964 patients were enrolled in the CASE-AF registry. Among them, 333 patients were in SR immediately before surgery (study cohort). A complete follow-up was achieved for 95.6%. Both the severity of the AF (modified European Heart Rhythm Association symptom classification, p < 0.001) and the frequency of AF symptoms (p = 0.006) were significantly reduced at one year compared to the preoperative baseline. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) during the procedure. The one-year mortality (4.1%) and stroke rates (3.2%) were low. SR was evident in 70.3% of the patients at the one-year follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with AF who have SR at the time of surgery should not be excluded from SA, as it appears to be a safe and effective procedure.

Outcomes of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

A considerable number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery suffer from atrial fibrillation and should be treated concomitantly. This manuscript evaluates the impact of on-pump versus off-pump bypass grafting on the applied lesion set and rhythm outcome.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and April 2020, patients who underwent combined bypass grafting and surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation were consecutively enrolled in the German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation registry (CASE-AF, 17 centres). Data were prospectively collected. Follow-up was planned after one year.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were enrolled. No differences in baseline characteristics were seen between on- and off-pump bypass grafting, especially not in type of atrial fibrillation and left atrial size. In the on-pump group (n = 171, 76%), pulmonary vein isolation and an extended left atrial lesion set were performed more often compared to off-pump bypass grafting (58% vs 26%, 33 vs 9%, respectively, P < 0.001). In off-pump bypass grafting a box isolating the atrial posterior wall was the dominant lesion (72% off-pump vs 42% on-pump, P < 0.001). Left atrial appendage management was comparable in on-pump versus off-pump bypass grafting (94% vs 91%, P = 0.37). Sinus rhythm at follow-up was confirmed in 61% in the on-pump group and in 65% in the off-pump group (P = 0.66). No differences were seen in in-hospital or follow-up complication-rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In coronary artery bypass grafting patients undergoing concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation, our data suggests that the technique applied for myocardial revascularization (off-pump vs on-pump) leads to differences in the ablation lesion set, but not in safety and effectiveness.

Long-term results of atrial fibrillation surgery concomitant with mitral valve surgery: A propensity score-matched multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to elucidate the long-term outcomes of atrial fibrillation surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease by comparing the patients who underwent mitral valve surgery with and without atrial fibrillation surgery.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2017, 2680 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent mitral valve surgery (mitral valve surgery with atrial fibrillation surgery, n = 1841; mitral valve surgery without atrial fibrillation surgery, n = 839) at 5 centers were included. After propensity score matching, 1442 patients were extracted (atrial fibrillation surgery group, n = 721; non-atrial fibrillation surgery group, n = 721). All-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and permanent pacemaker implantation were compared between the atrial fibrillation surgery and non-atrial fibrillation surgery groups.

RESULTS

Overall survivals at 5 and 10 years postoperatively were 91.0% and 80.7% in the atrial fibrillation surgery group and 86.5% and 75.9% in the non-atrial fibrillation surgery group, respectively (P = .013). Cardiac mortality-free survivals at 5 and 10 years postoperatively were 96.9% and 91.7% in the atrial fibrillation surgery group and 90.9% and 83.7% in the non-atrial fibrillation surgery group, respectively (P < .001). Cumulative incidence of reoperation, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and stroke or transient ischemic attack was lower in the matched atrial fibrillation surgery group compared with the matched non-atrial fibrillation surgery group up to 15 years postoperatively (P = .010, P < .001, and P = .012, respectively). Cumulative incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the matched atrial fibrillation surgery group compared with the matched non-atrial fibrillation surgery group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease, mitral valve surgery concomitant with atrial fibrillation surgery was associated with lower mortality, cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and stroke or transient ischemic attack up to 15 years after surgery when compared with mitral valve surgery without atrial fibrillation surgery.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Factors for Recurrence and Long-Term Outcome

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Due to the insufficient efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs and their adverse side effects, there has been considerable interest in the interventional treatment of AF, including both catheter ablation and surgical ablation. Surgical ablation or the maze procedure is a treatment option for patients with AF undergoing concomitant or isolated cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data to investigate short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent the surgical ablation of AF. Outcome variables included freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias and mortality at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year follow-ups. We also identified risk factors for arrhythmia recurrence and mortality.

SETTING

Israel's largest university tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population comprised 668 patients operated on between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2022. All patient data were extracted from our departmental database.

INTERVENTIONS

Concomitant or stand-alone surgical AF ablation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 106 ± 66.7 months. Freedom from AF was 97.6% (n = 615) and mortality was 3% (n = 20) at the 1-year follow-up, 95.3% (n = 574) and 6.1% (n = 45) at 3 years, 90.1% (n = 396) and 9.1% (n = 61) at 5 years, and 77.5% (n = 308) and 10.8% (n = 72) at 7 years. According to logistic regression analysis, age and female sex determined the 7-year freedom from AF, and risk factors for 7-year mortality included diabetes mellitus, age, and valve surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical ablation had a high success rate, with freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year follow-ups. Age and female sex were factors determining the 5- and 7-year recurrence of AF.

Atrial Fibrillation Management During Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Societal guidelines support atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Recently, many patients with AF at low to intermediate risk are managed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, we evaluated longitudinal outcomes in these populations.

METHODS

The United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database was evaluated for all beneficiaries with AF undergoing TAVR or SAVR with/without AF treatment (2018-2020). Treatment of AF included concomitant left atrial appendage obliteration, with/without surgical ablation, or endovascular appendage occlusion and/or catheter ablation at any time. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes defined procedures with doubly robust risk adjustment across each group.

RESULTS

A total of 24,902 patients were evaluated (17,453 TAVR; 7,449 SAVR). Of patients undergoing SAVR, 3176 (42.6%) underwent AF treatment (SAVR+AF). Only 656 TAVR patients (4.5%) received AF treatment. Comparing well-balanced SAVR+AF vs SAVR vs TAVR, there were no differences in the in-hospital incidence of renal failure, bleeding, or stroke, but increased pacemaker requirement (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; P < .0001) and vascular injury (OR, 9.09; P < .0001) were noted in TAVR and higher hospital mortality (OR, 4.02; P < .0001) in SAVR+AF. SAVR+AF was associated with lower readmission for stroke compared with SAVR alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; P = .029) and TAVR (HR, 0.68; P < .0001) and with improved survival vs TAVR (HR, 0.79; P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

In Medicare beneficiaries with AF requiring aortic valve replacement, SAVR+AF was associated with improved longitudinal survival and freedom from stroke compared with TAVR. SAVR+AF treatment should be considered first-line therapy for patients with AF requiring aortic valve replacement.

First-in-Man Use of Intraoperative Electrophysiological Mapping to Evaluate the Efficacy of the EnCompass Clamp During a Cox-IV Maze Procedure

This case report describes the first-in-man use of intraoperative electrophysiological (EP) mapping to evaluate the efficacy of the EnCompass clamp (AtriCure, Inc., Mason, OH) during a Cox-IV Maze procedure. A 53-year-old male with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and severe mitral valve regurgitation underwent mitral valve repair with concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Intraoperative 3D EP mapping was performed using the Abbott EnSite Precision system (Abbott Inc., Chicago, IL) before ablation, after initial radiofrequency ablation with the AtriCure EnCompass clamp, and after the full Cox-IV Maze procedure was completed. The pre-ablation map showed approximately 80-85% high voltage areas in the posterior left atrial wall. Initial ablation with the EnCompass clamp reduced high voltage areas to 30-35%. The final map following the Cox-IV Maze procedure demonstrated near-complete electrical silence, with only 5-10% of the atrial surface retaining high voltage activity. This represents an estimated 88% reduction in high-voltage areas from baseline. The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course apart from one episode of postoperative atrial fibrillation requiring direct current (DC) cardioversion. This case demonstrates the utility of intraoperative EP mapping in guiding and confirming the efficacy of surgical ablation procedures, as well as the effectiveness of combining the EnCompass clamp with a full Cox-IV Maze in achieving comprehensive atrial electrical isolation. The EnCompass clamp can be used for ablations with a beating heart, thus reducing the aortic cross-clamp time and therefore minimizing the total myocardial ischemia time.

Age-Stratified Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

The management of aortic stenosis has evolved to stratification by age as reflected in recent societal guidelines. We evaluated age-stratified surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) trends and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

METHODS

This cohort included adults (≥18 years) undergoing SAVR for severe aortic stenosis between July 2011 and December 2022. Comparisons were stratified by age (<65 years, 65-79 years, ≥80 years) and BAV or TAV status. Primary end points included operative mortality, composite morbidity and mortality, and permanent stroke. Observed to expected ratios by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 200,849 SAVR patients (55,326 BAV [27.5%], 145,526 TAV [72.5%]) from 1238 participating hospitals met study criteria. Annual SAVR volumes decreased by 45% (19,560 to 10,851) during the study period. The decrease was greatest (96%) for patients ≥80 years of age (4914 to 207). The relative prevalence of BAV was greater in younger patients (<65 years, 69,068 [49.5% BAV]; 65-79 years, 104,382 [19.1% BAV]; ≥80 years, 27,399 [4.5% BAV]). The observed mortality in <80-year-old BAV patients (<65 years, 1.08; 65-79 years, 1.21; ≥80 years, 3.68) was better than the expected mortality rate (<65 years, 1.22; 65-79 years, 1.54; ≥80 years, 3.14).

CONCLUSIONS

SAVR volume in the transcatheter era has decreased substantially, particularly for patients ≥80 years old and for those with TAV. Younger patients with BAV have better than expected outcomes, which should be carefully considered during shared decision-making in the treatment of aortic stenosis. SAVR should remain the preferred therapy in this population.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Therapy Overview and Future Perspective

The left atrial appendage (LAA) has gained increasing attention in the field of cardiology as a potential site for intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to mitigate the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, especially in individuals who are unsuitable candidates for long-term anticoagulation therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of LAAO, encompassing its anatomic considerations, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation incorporate the most recent evidence for surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion in different clinical scenarios. Substantial new evidence regarding the risks and benefits of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion and the long-term benefits of surgical ablation has been produced in the last 5 years. Compared with the 2017 clinical practice guideline, the current update has an emphasis on surgical ablation in first-time, nonemergent cardiac surgery and its long-term benefits, an extension of the recommendation to perform surgical ablation in all patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time, nonemergent cardiac surgery, and a new class I recommendation for left atrial appendage occlusion in all patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time, nonemergent cardiac surgery. Further guidance is provided for patients with structural heart disease and atrial fibrillation being considered for transcatheter valve repair or replacement, as well as patients in need of isolated left atrial appendage management who are not candidates for surgical ablation. The importance of a multidisciplinary team assessment, treatment planning, and long-term follow-up are reiterated in this clinical practice guideline with a class I recommendation, along with the other recommendations from the 2017 guidelines that remained unchanged in their class of recommendation and level of evidence.

Concomitant Surgical Ablation in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Mitral Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite prospective randomized evidence supporting concomitant treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) during mitral valve (MV) surgery, variation in surgical management of AF remains. We assessed longitudinal outcomes after surgical treatment of persistent or paroxysmal AF during MV surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

All Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of AF undergoing MV surgery (2018-2020) were evaluated. Patients were stratified by no AF treatment, left atrial appendage obliteration (LAAO) alone, or surgical ablation and LAAO (SA+LAAO). Doubly robust risk adjustment and subgroup analysis by persistent or paroxysmal AF were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 7517 patients with preoperative AF underwent MV surgery (32.1% no AF treatment, 23.1% LAAO alone, 44.7% SA+LAAO). After doubly robust risk adjustment, AF treatment with SA+LAAO or LAAO alone were associated with lower 3-year readmission for stroke or bleeding. However, SA+LAAO was associated with reduced 3-year mortality and readmission for AF or heart failure compared with no AF treatment or LAAO alone. Compared with no AF treatment or LAAO alone, SA+LAAO was associated with lower composite end point of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.75) or death (hazard ratio, 0.83) at 3 years. Subgroup analysis identified similar longitudinal benefits of SA+LAAO in patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF.

CONCLUSIONS

In Medicare beneficiaries with AF undergoing MV surgery, SA+LAAO was associated with improved longitudinal outcomes compared with LAAO alone or no AF treatment in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. These contemporary real-world data further clarify the benefit of SA+LAAO during MV surgery across all types of AF.

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with improved survival compared with appendage obliteration alone: An analysis of 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries

OBJECTIVE

Societal guidelines support the concomitant surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Recent evidence has highlighted the stroke reduction of left atrial appendage obliteration with or without surgical ablation in similar populations. To inform clinical decision-making, we evaluated real-world outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery by comparing no atrial fibrillation management with left atrial appendage obliteration alone versus surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration.

METHODS

By using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or mitral/aortic/tricuspid valve repair or replacement between January 2018 and December 2020. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision procedure codes were used to define variables. Risk adjustment was performed with regression analysis using inverse probability weighting of propensity scores and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses stratified patients by primary operation and paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

A total of 103,382 patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation were stratified by surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (10,437; 10.1%), left atrial appendage obliteration alone (12,901; 12.5%), or no atrial fibrillation management (80,044; 77.4%). Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (21,076; 20.4%) received the highest proportion of surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (4661 19.4%) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (3%724%; 15.4%) versus no atrial fibrillation management (15,688; 65.2%). Likewise, patients undergoing open atrial operations (mitral/tricuspid; 17,204; 16.6%) had higher proportions of atrial fibrillation treatment (surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration 5267 30.6%; left atrial appendage obliteration alone 4259 24.8%; no atrial fibrillation management 7678 44.6%). After robust risk adjustment, surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration was independently associated with reduced 3-year mortality compared with no atrial fibrillation treatment (hazard ratio, 0.68, P < .001) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (hazard ratio, 0.90, P < .001). Compared with no atrial fibrillation treatment, readmissions for embolic stroke were lower with both surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (hazard ratio, 0.77, P = .009) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (hazard ratio, 0.73, P < .001). Reduction in 3-year composite mortality or stroke after surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration was superior to left atrial appendage alone (hazard ratio, 0.90, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

In Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery, the surgical management of atrial fibrillation was associated with lower 3-year mortality and readmission for stroke, with surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration being associated with higher survival compared with left atrial appendage obliteration alone.

Treating Atrial Fibrillation is No Maze: A Reminder to Heart Teams for Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Cardiac Surgery

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and is often found during times of other cardiac pathologies that require surgical management including coronary revascularization and valve surgery. Surgical ablation of AF, most frequently performed through the Cox-Maze IV procedure, is highly effective in restoring sinus rhythm. Despite robust society guideline recommendations for concomitant surgical ablation (CSA) for AF, the practice has yet to be widely adopted. In this review, we discuss the current indications for CSA, its efficacy in maintaining freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias, stroke, and adverse long-term outcomes, the safety profile of SA when performed alongside cardiac surgical cases, and challenges with its implementation across the most common concomitant cardiac operations. In conclusion, we present a reminder to multidisciplinary heart teams to consider CSA when indicated for their patients.

Lesion durability found during mandated percutaneous catheter ablation after surgical cryo-ablation for treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Current recommendations support surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients indicated for cardiac surgery. These procedures are referred to as concomitant and may be carried out using radiofrequency energy or cryo-ablation. This study aimed to assess the electrophysiological findings in patients undergoing concomitant cryo-ablation.

METHODS

Patients with non-paroxysmal AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve repair/replacement were included in the trial if concomitant cryo-ablation was part of the treatment plan according to current guidelines. The patients reported in this study were assigned to undergo staged percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation (PRFCA), i.e., hybrid treatment, as a part of the SURHYB trial protocol.

RESULTS

We analyzed 103 patients who underwent PRFCA 105 ± 35 days after surgery. Left and right pulmonary veins (PVs) were found isolated in 65 (63.1%) and 63 (61.2%) patients, respectively. The LA posterior wall isolation and mitral isthmus conduction block were found in 38 (36.9%) and 18 (20.0%) patients, respectively. Electrical reconnections (gaps) in the left PVs were more often localized superiorly than inferiorly (57.9% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.005) and anteriorly than posteriorly (65.8% vs. 31.6%, P = 0.003). Gaps in the right PVs were more equally distributed anteroposteriorly but dominated in superior segments (72.5% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.003). There was a higher number of gaps on the roof line compared to the inferior line (131 (67.2%) vs. 67 (42.2%), P < 0.001). Compared to epicardial cryo-ablation, endocardial was more effective in creating PVs and LA posterior wall isolation (P < 0.05). Cryo-ablation using nitrous oxide (N20) or argon (Ar) gas as cooling agents was similarly effective (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of surgical cryo-ablation in achieving transmural and durable lesions in the left atrium is surprisingly low. Gaps are located predominantly in the superior and anterior portions of the PVs and on the roof line. Endocardial cryo-ablation is more effective than epicardial ablation, irrespective of the cooling agent used.

Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in High-Risk Patients: Success versus Risk

BACKGROUND

 Surgical atrial ablation is evaluated by surgeons in relation to the estimated surgical risk. We analyze whether high-risk patients (HRPs) experience risk escalation by ablation procedures.

METHODS

 The CASE-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) registry is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers registry of atrial ablation in cardiac surgery. We analyzed the 1-year outcome regarding survival and rhythm endpoints of 1,000 consecutive patients according to the operative risk classification (EuroSCORE II ≤ 2 vs. >2).

RESULTS

 Higher NYHA (New York Heart Association) score, ischemic heart failure, status poststroke, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus were strongly represented in HRPs. HRPs exhibit more left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% (19.2 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.001) but identical left atrial diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter compared with low-risk patients (LRPs). CHA2DS-Vasc-score (2.4 ± 1 vs. 3.6 ± 1.5; p < 0.001), sternotomies, combination surgeries, coronary artery bypass graft, and mitral valve procedures were increased in HRPs. LRPs underwent stand-alone ablations as well. Ablation energy did not differ. Left atrial appendage closure was performed in up to 86.1% (mainly cut-and-sew procedures). Mortality corresponded to the original risk class without an escalation that may be related to ablation, stroke rate, or myocardial infarction. A total of 60.6% of HRPs versus 75.1% of LRPs were discharged in sinus rhythm. Long-term EHRA (European Heart Rhythm Association) score symptoms were lower in HRPs. Repeated rhythm therapies were rare. Additional antiarrhythmics received a minority without group dependency. A total of 1.6 versus 4.1% of HRPs (p = 0.042) underwent long-term stroke; excess mortality was not observed. Anticoagulation remained common in HRPs.

CONCLUSION

 Surgical risk and long-term mortality are determined by the underlying disease. In HRPs, freedom from AF and symptom relief can be achieved. Preoperative risk scores should not lead to withholding an ablation procedure.

Efficacy of a surgical cardiac ablation clamp using nanosecond pulsed electric fields: An acute porcine model

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of a recently developed nonthermal technology, nanosecond pulse-field ablation (nsPFA), for surgical ablation of the atria in a beating heart porcine model.

METHODS

Six pigs underwent sternotomy and ablation using an nsPFA parallel clamp. The ablation electrodes (53 mm long) were embedded in the jaws of the clamp. Nine lesions per pig were created in locations chosen to be representative of the Cox-maze procedure. Four lesions were intended to electrically isolate parts of the atrium: the right atrial appendage, left atrial appendage, right pulmonary veins, and left pulmonary veins. For these lesions, exit block testing was performed both after ablation and before euthanasia; the time between the 2 tests was 3.3 ± 0.5 hours (range, 2-4 hours). Using purse string sutures, 5 more lesions were created up to the superior vena cava, down to the inferior vena cava, across the right atrial free wall, and at 2 distinct locations on the left atrial free wall. The clamp delivered a train of nanosecond duration pulses, with a total duration of 2.5 seconds, independent of tissue thickness. The heart tissue was stained with 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride after a dwelling period of 2 hours. Subsequently, each lesion was cross sectioned at 5-mm intervals to assess the ablation depth and transmurality. In some sections, transmurality could not be established on the basis of triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining alone; for these lesions, Gomori-trichrome stains were used, and the histologic sections were evaluated for transmurality.

RESULTS

The ablation time was 2.5 seconds per lesion, for a total of only 22.5 seconds ablation time to create 9 lesions. A total of 53 lesions were created, resulting in 388 separate histologic sections. Transmurality was established in 386 sections (99.5%). Mean tissue thickness was 3.1 ± 1.5 mm (range, 0.2-8.6 mm). Exit block was confirmed in 23 of the 24 lesions (96%) postablation and 23 of 24 (96%) before the animals were humanely killed. Over the course of the procedure, neither pulse-induced arrhythmias nor any other complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nsPFA clamp device was effective in creating acute conduction block and transmural lesions in both the right and left atria in an acute porcine model. This nonthermal energy source has great potential to both shorten procedural time and enable effective ablation in the beating heart.

A Comparative Study of Thoracoscopic Left Atrial Appendage Clipping vs Stapled Resection

BACKGROUND

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the predominant site of thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation (AF), which is associated with ischemic stroke. This study comparatively evaluated the complete LAA closure rates between LAA clipping and stapled resections.

METHODS

The study included 333 patients who underwent thoracoscopic operation with both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans. Propensity score matching (4:1 ratio) was applied, matching 90 LAA clipping patients with 206 stapled resection patients. The primary end point was complete LAA closure, defined as a residual LAA depth of <1 cm on computed tomographic images obtained 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

No 30-day death was observed. Complete LAA closure was achieved in 85.9% (286 of 333) of patients. After propensity score matching, the clipping group demonstrated a significantly higher complete LAA closure rate than the stapled resection group (95.6% vs 83.0%, P = .003). The residual LAA stump depth was also shorter in the clipping group compared with the stapled resection group (2.9 vs 5.3 mm, P = .001). Two patients with a residual LAA stump exhibited an association with ischemic stroke during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The clipping group demonstrated a higher rate of complete LAA closure compared with the stapled resection group. Close monitoring of patients with residual LAA stumps is essential. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to elucidate impact of the residual LAA stump on thromboembolic events.

Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Clip Placement During Cardiac Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis

This study evaluated the nationwide associations between concomitant left atrial appendage clip (LAAC) placement during cardiac surgery and postoperative outcomes. We identified 1,260,999 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, valve, and aortic surgeries in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified by concomitant LAAC versus no LAAC placement. Patients who underwent surgical ablation were excluded. Mortality and complications were compared during index admissions and for patients readmitted within 30 and 90 days of the index discharge date for unmatched and propensity score-matched groups. Overall, 6.7% (84,293) of patients underwent cardiac surgery and concomitant LAAC placement without surgical ablation. After propensity score matching, the index admission mortality and overall complications were not different in patients with LAAC versus patients without LAAC. LAAC placement was associated with increased any-cause 30-day readmissions (15% vs 13%, p <0.01). In patients with LAAC, within 30 days, there were no differences in mortality (3.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.60) or overall complications (64% vs 63%, p = 0.20), whereas stroke was lower (5.3% vs 6.5%, p <0.01) and heart failure was higher (35% vs 30%, p <0.01). For patients readmitted within 90 days, similar findings were observed for any-cause readmissions, mortality, overall complications, stroke, and heart failure. In conclusion, concomitant LAAC placement during cardiac surgery was associated with lower early postdischarge incidence of stroke and a favorable overall risk-benefit profile. Given these short-term findings in a real-world population of all patients who underwent cardiac surgery, longer-term studies with more granular data are needed to evaluate the potential benefit of this practice.

Randomized feasibility trial of prophylactic radiofrequency ablation to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of prophylactic radiofrequency isolation of the pulmonary veins, with left atrial appendage amputation, to reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery in patients aged 70 years and older.

METHODS

The Federal Food and Drug Administration granted an investigational device exemption to utilize a bipolar radiofrequency clamp for prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation in a limited feasibility trial. Sixty-two patients without prior dysrhythmias were prospectively randomized to undergo either their index cardiac surgical procedure or bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage amputation during their cardiac operation. The primary outcome was occurrence of in-hospital postoperative atrial fibrillation. Subjects were on 24-hour telemetry until discharge. Dysrhythmias, any episode of atrial fibrillation >30 seconds, were confirmed by electrophysiologists blinded to the study.

RESULTS

Sixty patients, mean age 75 years and mean Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (>65 = 1, >75 = 2 points), Diabetes, previous Stroke/Transient ischemic attack (2 points), Vascular disease, Gender (female) score of 4, were analyzed. Thirty-one patients randomized to control and 29 to the treatment group. The majority of patients in each group underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. No perioperative complications related to the treatment procedure, need for permanent pacemaker, or mortality occurred. The in-hospital incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was 55% (17 out of 31) in the control group and 7% (2 out of 29) in the treatment group (P < .001) The control group had a significantly higher requirement for antiarrhythmic medications at discharge: 45% (14 out of 31) versus 7% (2 out of 29) in the treatment group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic radiofrequency isolation of the pulmonary veins with left atrial appendage amputation during the primary cardiac surgical operation reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients aged 70 years and older with no history of atrial arrhythmias.

Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation: Early assessment of feasibility, safety, and efficacy

Objectives

To assess feasibility, safety, and early efficacy of robotic-enhanced epicardial ablation (RE-EA) as first stage of a hybrid approach to patients with persistent (PsAF) and long-standing atrial fibrillation (LSAF).

Methods

Single-center, retrospective analysis of patients with documented PsAF and LSAF who underwent RE-EA followed by catheter-guided endocardial ablation. Postoperatively, patients were monitored for major adverse events and underwent rhythm follow-up at 3 and 12 months.

Results

Between January 2021 and June 2023, we performed RE-EA in 64 patients (73.5% male, CHA2DS2-VASc 2.7 ± 1.6, BMI 34.1 ± 6.3 kg/m2). Mean AF preoperative duration and left atrial volume index were, respectively, 85 months and 47.5 mL/m2. Through the robotic approach, the intended lesion set was completed in all patients without cardiopulmonary bypass support, conversion to thoracotomy/sternotomy, blood transfusions, or perioperative mortality. The average LOS was 1.7 days, with only 1 patient requiring intensive care unit admission and >65% of patients discharged within 24 hours. At follow-up, 2 (3.1%) patients experienced new left pleural effusion or hemidiaphragm paralysis requiring treatment. There were no readmissions related to AF, stroke, thromboembolic events, or deaths. The mean interval between the epicardial and endocardial stages of the procedure was 5.9 months. Rhythm follow-up showed AF resolution in 73.4% and 71.9% of patients at 3 and 12 months, respectively.

Conclusions

RE-EA is a feasible and safe, first-stage approach for the treatment of patients with PsAF and LSAF. It improves exposure of the intended targets, favors short hospital stay, and facilitates return to activity with satisfactory AF treatment in the short term.

Concomitant Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

Societal guidelines support concomitant management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To assess real-world adoption and outcomes, this study evaluated Medicare beneficiaries with AF who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with surgical ablation (SA) or left atrial appendage obliteration (LAAO) or both procedures in combination (SA + LAAO).

METHODS

The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient claims database identified all patients with AF who underwent isolated CABG from 2018 to 2020. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases-10th revision procedure codes defined covariates for doubly robust risk adjustment.

RESULTS

A total of 19,524 patients with preoperative AF who underwent isolated CABG were stratified by SA + LAAO (3475 patients; 17.8%), LAAO only (4541 patients; 23.3%), or no AF treatment (11,508 patients; 58.9%). After doubly robust risk adjustment, longitudinal analysis highlighted that concomitant AF treatment with SA + LAAO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P = .049) or LAAO alone (HR, 0.75; P = . 031) was associated with a significant reduction in readmission for stroke at 3 years compared with no AF treatment. Furthermore, SA + LAAO (HR, 0.86; P = .016) but not LAAO alone (HR, 0.97; P = .573) was associated with improved survival compared with no AF treatment. Finally, SA + LAAO was associated with a superior composite outcome of freedom from stroke or death at 3 years compared with LAAO alone (HR, 0.86;, P = .033) or no AF treatment (HR, 0.81; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In Medicare beneficiaries with AF who underwent isolated CABG, concomitant AF treatment was associated with reduced 3-year readmission for stroke. SA + LAAO was associated with superior reduction in stroke or death at 3 years compared with LAAO alone or no AF treatment.

Statewide data on surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: The data provide a path forward

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation (AF), if left untreated, is associated with increased intermediate and long-term morbidity/mortality. Surgical treatment for AF is lacking standardization in patient selection and lesion set, despite clear support from multi-society guidelines. The aim of this study was to analyze a statewide cardiac surgery registry to establish whether or not there is an association between center volume and type of index procedure with performance of surgical ablation (SA) for AF, the lesion set chosen, and ablation technology used.

METHODS

Adult, first-time, nonemergency patients with preoperative AF between 2014 and 2022 excluding standalone SA procedures from a statewide registry of Society of Thoracic Surgeons data were included (N = 4320). AF treatment variability by hospital volume (ordered from smallest to largest) and surgery type were examined with χ2 analyses. Hospital-level Spearman correlations compared hospital volume with proportion of AF patients treated with SA.

RESULTS

Overall, 37% of patients with AF were ablated at the time of surgery (63% of mitral procedures, 26% of non-mitrals) and 15% had left atrial appendage management only. There was a significant temporal trend of increasing performance of SA for AF over time (Cochran-Armitage = 27.8; P < .001). Hospital cardiac surgery volume did not correlate with the proportion of AF patients treated with SA (rs = 0.19; P = .603) with a rate of SA below the state average for academic centers. Of cases with SA (n = 1582), only 43% had a biatrial lesion set. Procedures that involved mitral surgery were more likely to include a biatrial lesion set (χ2 = 392.3; P < .001) for both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Similarly, ablation technology use was variable by type of concomitant operation (χ2 = 219.0; P < .001) such that radiofrequency energy was more likely to be used in non-mitral procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate an increase in adoption of SA for AF over time. No association between greater hospital volume or academic status and performance of SA for AF was established. Similar to national data, the type of index procedure remains the most consistent factor in the decision to perform SA with a disconnect between AF pathophysiology and decision making on the type of SA performed. This analysis demonstrates a gap between evidence-based guidelines and real-world practice, highlighting an opportunity to confer the benefits of concomitant SA to more patients.

Additional bypass graft or concomitant surgical ablation? Insights from the HEIST registry

BACKGROUND

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting is reluctantly attempted. Meanwhile, complete revascularization is not always possible in these patients. We attempted to counterbalance the long-term benefits of surgical ablation against the risks of incomplete revascularization.

METHODS

Atrial fibrillation patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel disease between 2012 to 2022 and included in the HEart surgery In atrial fibrillation and Supraventricular Tachycardia registry were divided into complete revascularization, complete revascularization with additional grafts, and incomplete revascularization cohorts; these were further split into surgical ablation and non-surgical ablation subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 8,405 patients (78% men; age 69.3 ± 7.9) were included; of those, 5,918 (70.4%) had complete revascularization, and 556 (6.6%) had surgical ablation performed. Number of anastomoses was 2.7 ± 1.2. The median follow-up was 5.1 [interquartile range 2.1-8.8] years. In patients in whom complete revascularization was achieved, surgical ablation was associated with long-term survival benefit: hazard ratio 0.69; 95% confidence intervals (0.50-0.94); P = .020 compared with grafting additional lesions. Similarly, in patients in whom complete revascularization was not achieved, surgical ablation was associated with a long-term survival benefit of 0.68 (0.49-0.94); P = .019. When comparing surgical ablation on top of incomplete revascularization against complete revascularization without additional grafts or surgical ablation, there was no difference between the 2: 0.84 (0.61-1.17); P = .307, which was also consistent in the propensity score-matched analysis: 0.75 (0.39-1.43); P = .379.

CONCLUSION

To achieve complete revascularization is of utmost importance. However, when facing incomplete revascularization at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with underlying atrial fibrillation, concomitant surgical ablation on top of incomplete revascularization is associated with similar long-term survival as complete revascularization without surgical ablation.

One hundred percent utilization of a modified CryoMaze III procedure for atrial fibrillation with mitral surgery

OBJECTIVES

Concomitant atrial fibrillation often goes untreated because of surgeon concerns regarding lesion set complexity and pump times. We describe a new cryoablation procedure to address this.

METHODS

From June 2013 to March 2021, a modified CryoMaze III procedure was used using 3 left atrial ± 3 right atrial cryo-applications creating the key lesions of the Cox Maze III procedure. Since 2018, 3-minute cryo-lesions were used for the left atrial box lesion for total cryoablation times of 8 minutes for the left atrium ± 6 minutes for the right atrium. By using propensity matching, patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with no atrial fibrillation history were compared with CryoMaze III-treated patients.

RESULTS

A total of 100% of the 277 patients with atrial fibrillation requiring mitral valve surgery ± other procedures received the modified CryoMaze III procedure. After propensity score matching (n = 161 each group), the modified CryoMaze III group had mean crossclamp and bypass times 10.5 and 13.4 minutes longer than the control group, respectively. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, morbidity, pacemaker use, renal dysfunction, or late survival between groups, but there were less postoperative strokes in the CryoMaze III group. Freedom from atrial fibrillation off antiarrhythmics was 77% (mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 2.1 years). At 12 months, freedom from atrial fibrillation off antiarrhythmics was 90% for the 3-minute ablation group. Late survival was similar to age- and sex-matched Centers for Disease Control and Prevention controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified CryoMaze III technique is efficient, safe, and effective. Education of the surgical community regarding the late benefits of ablation and the simplicity of this new technique should improve adoption of the Class I Guidelines to treat concomitant atrial fibrillation.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Left atrial strain predicts the rhythm outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing left atrial cryoablation during minimally invasive mitral valve repair

Objectives

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have lower left atrial (LA) strain, which is a predictor for LA function. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of LA strain to predict the rhythm outcome in patients with persistent AF undergoing LA cryoablation concomitant to minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

Methods

Between 01/2016 and 12/2020, 72 patients with persistent AF underwent LA cryoablation during minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. All patients received a complete LA lesion set and left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with a clip. All patients received preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with LA and left ventricular strain measurements. Preoperative LA and LV strain analysis was correlated with postoperative rhythm outcome.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 66.9 ± 7.2 years, of whom 42 (58%) were male patients. No major ablation-related complications occurred in any of the patients. Successful LAA closure was confirmed by intraoperative echocardiography in all patients. The 1-year survival rate was 97%. Freedom from AF at 12 months was 72% and 68% off antiarrhythmic drugs. Preoperative LA strain values were statistically significantly higher in patients with freedom from AF at 12 months of follow-up (12.7% ± 6.9% vs. 4.9% ± 4.1%, p = 0.006). Preoperative LV strain value was not associated with postoperative rhythm outcome. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, LA strain (p < 0.001) and AF duration (p = 0.017) were predictors for freedom from AF at 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

In our study, LA strain analysis predicted the rhythm outcome in patients with persistent AF undergoing concomitant surgical AF ablation. In the future, LA strain might be a useful tool to guide decision-making on ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF.

Clinical benefits of surgical ablation during isolated aortic valve replacement: a nationwide study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the early- and long-term clinical outcomes of concomitant surgical ablation (SA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) during isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database.

METHODS

Of 23,332 adult patients who underwent AVR between 2003 and 2019, those with underlying AF with or without concomitant SA were extracted, and propensity score matching analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,741 patients with underlying AF with (n = 445, group A) or without (n = 1,296, group N) concomitant SA during isolated AVR were enrolled, from whom 435 pairs were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching analysis. The operative mortality and early postoperative morbidities, including bleeding reoperation, stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation and acute kidney injury were comparable between the groups. The overall survival showed no differences between the groups. However, the cumulative incidence of new-onset late ischaemic stroke was significantly lower in group A than group N in propensity score-matched patients [2.3 vs 3.5 per 100 patient-years, adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.64 (0.43-0.96), Group A versus Group N, respectively]. The cumulative incidence of other morbidities such as reoperation, permanent pacemaker implantation and progression to chronic renal failure showed no difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of late ischaemic stroke was significantly lower when concomitant SA was performed during isolated AVR in patients with underlying AF. Therefore, concomitant SA should be actively considered in patients with underlying AF undergoing isolated AVR to prevent the occurrence of late ischaemic stroke.

Feasibility of concomitant exclusion of left atrial appendage during novel transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair

The AtriClip device enables the safe and reproducible epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage. Transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair using NeoChord DS100 Artificial Chordae Delivery System has matured and become more standardized. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of combining NeoChord repair and left atrial appendage exclusion in a single procedure through the same minithoracotomy in patients with mitral valve prolapse and atrial fibrillation. From 2018 to 2019, seven patients with severe mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation underwent transesophageal echocardiography-guided transapical off-pump mitral valve repair with the novel NeoChord DS 1000 system and concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion using the AtriClip Pro II device. Both procedures were performed via left mini-thoracotomy. The AtriClip device was applied after the NeoChord repair was done. All seven patients had less than moderate mitral regurgitation after the NeoChord repair and successful left atrial appendage occlusion. There were no device or procedure-related complications. Clinical follow-up revealed significant symptomatic improvement, and no cardiovascular complications were reported. Transesophageal echocardiography at 6-12 months post-procedure showed stable left atrial appendage occlusion with no residual flow between the left atrium and the left atrial appendage and a stump of less than 5 mm. Beating heart epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage using AtriClip concomitant with transapical mitral valve repair using Neochord DS 1000 system is a feasible and safe treatment option in mitral valve prolapse and atrial fibrillation in patients with limited indications. However, its safety needs to be confirmed in a larger series of patients.

Practicality and Safety of Electrical Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Lung Transplant Recipients With Pretransplant Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Lung transplant surgery creates surgical pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as a routine part of the procedure. However, many patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation continue to have atrial fibrillation at 1 y. We hypothesized that the addition of electrical PVI and left atrial appendage isolation/ligation (LAL) to the lung transplant procedure restores sinus rhythm at 1 y in patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult lung transplant recipients at the University of California Los Angeles from April 2006 to August 2021. All patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation underwent concomitant PVI/LAL and were compared with lung transplant recipients without preoperative atrial fibrillation. In-hospital outcomes; 1-y survival; and the incidence of stroke, cardiac readmissions, repeat ablations, and sinus rhythm (composite endpoint) were examined at 1 y for the PVI/LAL cohort.

Results

Sixty-one lung transplant recipients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation underwent concomitant PVI/LAL. No patient in the PVI/LAL cohort required cardiac-related readmission or catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation within 1 y of transplantation. Freedom from the composite endpoint of death, stroke, cardiac readmission, and repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation at 1 y was 85% (95% confidence interval, 73%-92%) for lung transplant recipients treated with PVI/LAL.

Conclusions

The addition of PVI/LAI to the lung transplant operation in patients with pretransplant atrial fibrillation was safe and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm and baseline risk of stroke at 1 y.

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation during aortic and mitral valve surgery: A nationwide population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of surgical atrial fibrillation ablation in reducing mortality or thromboembolic events during aortic/mitral valve surgery. We evaluated the association of surgical ablation versus no ablation with risks of all-cause death and ischemic stroke or systemic embolization among patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant aortic valve or mitral valve surgery.

METHODS

With the use of administrative healthcare datasets from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database between 2003 and 2018, adult patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing aortic/mitral valve replacement or mitral valve repair were enrolled, and their outcomes were compared according to the performance of concomitant surgical ablation. The primary end points were all-cause death and thromboembolic event of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization.

RESULTS

Among 17,247 patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing aortic/mitral valve surgery, 8716 (50.5%) received surgical ablation, whereas 8531 (49.5%) did not. During a median follow-up of 6.7 years (124,842.2 patient-years), death was less in the ablation group than in the no-ablation group (2.7 vs 4.1 patient-years; P < .001). The incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization was also lower in the ablation group (0.9 vs 1.3 patient-years; P < .001). After adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting, surgical ablation was associated with decreased risks of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.92), ischemic stroke or systemic embolization (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.71), and hospitalization from heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing aortic/mitral valve surgery, concomitant surgical ablation was significantly associated with lower risks of mortality and thromboembolic events.

Robust Artificial Intelligence Tool for Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis: Novel Development Approach Incorporating Both Atrial Electrograms and Surface ECG and Evaluation by Head-to-Head Comparison With Hospital-Based Physician ECG Readers

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases risk of embolic stroke, and in postoperative patients, increases cost of care. Consequently, ECG screening for AF in high-risk patients is important but labor-intensive. Artificial intelligence (AI) may reduce AF detection workload, but AI development presents challenges.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used a novel approach to AI development for AF detection using both surface ECG recordings and atrial epicardial electrograms obtained in postoperative cardiac patients. Atrial electrograms were used only to facilitate establishing true AF for AI development; this permitted the establishment of an AI-based tool for subsequent AF detection using ECG records alone. A total of 5 million 30-second epochs from 329 patients were annotated as AF or non-AF by expert ECG readers for AI training and validation, while 5 million 30-second epochs from 330 different patients were used for AI testing. AI performance was assessed at the epoch level as well as AF burden at the patient level. AI achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.932 on validation and 0.953 on testing. At the epoch level, testing results showed means of AF detection sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and F1 (harmonic mean of positive predictive value and sensitivity) as 0.970, 0.814, 0.976, 0.776, and 0.862, respectively, while the intraclass correlation coefficient for AF burden detection was 0.952. At the patient level, AF burden sensitivity and positive predictivity were 96.2% and 94.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of both atrial electrograms and surface ECG permitted development of a robust AI-based approach to postoperative AF recognition and AF burden assessment. This novel tool may enhance detection and management of AF, particularly in patients following operative cardiac surgery.

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation is efficacious in patients with giant left atria

OBJECTIVE

The Cox-Maze IV procedure (CMP-IV) is the most effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. Increased left atrial (LA) size has been identified as a risk factor for failure to restore sinus rhythm. This has biased many surgeons against ablation in patients with giant left atrium (GLA), defined as LA diameter >6.5 cm. In this study we aimed to define the efficacy of the CMP-IV in patients with GLA.

METHODS

From April 2004 through March 2020, 786 patients with a documented LA diameter underwent elective CMP-IV, 72 of whom had GLA. Median follow-up duration was 4 years (interquartile range, 1-7 years). Recurrence was defined as any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) lasting 30 seconds. ATA recurrence and survival were analyzed across GLA versus non-GLA groups.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 65 (interquartile range, 56-73) years. Median LA diameter within the GLA group was 7.0 (range, 6.6-10.0) cm. There were no differences in rates of postoperative complications for the 2 groups, including rate of postoperative stroke and pacemaker placement (GLA 14%; non-GLA 12%; P = .682). A trend toward increased 30-day mortality in the GLA group did not reach statistical significance (GLA 6%; non-GLA 2%; P = .051). Freedom from ATAs at 5 years postoperatively was comparable for the 2 groups (GLA 82%; non-GLA 84%).

CONCLUSIONS

The CMP-IV had good efficacy in patients with GLA. Our results suggest that LA diameter >6.5 cm should not preclude a patient from undergoing surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2023 Update on Procedure Data and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database is one of the largest and most comprehensive contemporary clinical databases in use. It now contains >9 million procedures from 1010 participants and 3651 active surgeons. Using audited data collection, it has provided the foundation for multiple risk models, performance metrics, health policy decisions, and a trove of research studies to improve the care of patients in need of cardiac surgical procedures. This annual report provides an update on the current status of the database and summarizes the development of new risk models and the STS Online Risk Calculator. Further, it provides insights into current practice patterns, such as the change in the demographics among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, the use of minimally invasive techniques for valve and bypass surgery, or the adoption of surgical ablation and left atrial appendage ligation among patients with atrial fibrillation. Lastly, an overview of the research conducted using the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database and future directions for the database are provided.

Sequential hybrid ablation vs. surgical CryoMaze alone for treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of multicentre randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Data on the hybrid atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment are lacking in patients with structural heart disease undergoing concomitant CryoMaze procedures. The aim was to assess whether the timely pre-emptive catheter ablation would achieve higher freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) and be associated with better clinical outcomes than surgical ablation alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The trial investigated patients with non-paroxysmal AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve repair/replacement with mandatory concomitant CryoMaze procedure who were randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency catheter ablation [Hybrid Group (HG)] or no further treatment (Surgery Group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the first recurrence of AF/AT without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs as assessed by implantable cardiac monitors. The primary clinical endpoint was a composite of hospitalization for arrhythmia recurrence, worsening of heart failure, cardioembolic event, or major bleeding. We analysed 113 and 116 patients in the Hybrid and Surgery Groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 715 (IQR: 528-1072) days. The primary efficacy endpoint was significantly reduced in the HG [41.1% vs. 67.4%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.57, P < 0.001] as well as the primary clinical endpoint (19.9% vs. 40.1%, HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.86, P = 0.012). The trial groups did not differ in all-cause mortality (10.6% vs. 8.6%, HR = 1.17, 95%CI: 0.51-2.71, P = 0.71). The major complications of catheter ablation were infrequent (1.9%).

CONCLUSION

Pre-emptively performed catheter ablation after the CryoMaze procedure was safe and associated with higher freedom from AF/AT and improved clinical outcomes.

Surgical management of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

AIMS

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated to be a safe procedure conducted concomitantly alongside cardiac surgery. However, there are conflicting guideline recommendations surrounding indications for surgical ablation. We conducted a systematic review of current recommendations on concomitant surgical AF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified publications from MEDLINE and EMBASE between January 2011 and December 2022 and additionally searched Guideline libraries and websites of relevant organizations in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of 895 studies screened, 4 were rigorously developed (AGREE-II > 50%) and included. All guidelines agreed on the definitions of paroxysmal, persistent, and longstanding AF based on duration and refraction to current treatment modalities. In the Australia-New Zealand (CSANZ) and European (EACTS) guidelines, opportunistic screening for patients >65 years is recommended. The EACTS recommends systematic screening for those aged >75 or at high stroke risk (Class IIa, Level B). However, this was not recommended by American Heart Association or Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines. All guidelines identified surgical AF ablation during concomitant cardiac surgery as safe and recommended for consideration by a Heart Team with notable variation in recommendation strength and the specific indication (three guidelines fail to specify any indication for surgery). Only the STS recommended left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) alongside surgical ablation (Class IIa, Level C).

CONCLUSION

Disagreements exist in recommendations for specific indications for concomitant AF ablation and LAAO, with the decision subject to Heart Team assessment. Further evidence is needed to develop recommendations for specific indications for concomitant AF procedures and guidelines need to be made congruent.

Surgical ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes from the CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) registry

OBJECTIVES

The CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) registry is a prospective, multicentre study for collecting and analysing real-world data of surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of surgery for long-standing persistent AF at 1 year.

METHODS

In total, 17 centres consecutively include all eligible patients with continuous AF lasting for ≥1 year. Exclusion criteria are missing informed consent or age <18 years. For patient-reported outcomes measures, the European Heart Rhythm Association score was used. No presence of AF (based on ECG findings including Holter ECG and/or implanted devices), no re-ablation, no further cardioversion and no rehospitalization due to AF after a 3-month blanking period defined no AF recurrence at 1 year.

RESULTS

From January 2017 to January 2020, a total of 1115 patients were enrolled in CASE-AF. Of them, 202 patients (mean age 69.7 ± 7.8 years, 27.2% female) underwent surgical ablation of long-standing persistent AF (study cohort), mostly accompanied by left atrial appendage closure (n = 180 [89%], resection n = 75 [42%]) and predominantly performed as concomitant (n = 174 [86%]) and left atrial only procedure (n = 144 [71%]). Early mortality (30 days) was 2.0% and morbidity was low. At follow-up (median 14.4 months, interquartile range, 12.7-17.6 months, 100% complete), 106 patients (56%) had no AF recurrence and 93% of them were asymptomatic. AF recurrence was accompanied by AF-related rehospitalization (n = 12, P = 0.003), direct current shock cardioversion (n = 23, P < 0.001), AF ablation (n = 7, P = 0.003) and stroke (n = 3, P = 0.059). Multivariable analysis identified cryoablation, predominantly performed endocardially including additional left atrial (74%) and biatrial (42%) lesions, as a significant factor for freedom from AF recurrence (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.07-6.79, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

According to CASE-AF, surgical ablation of long-standing persistent AF is most effective when concomitantly performed using endocardial cryoablation. Ongoing follow-up allows further elucidation of efficacious treatment strategies.

Trends in surgical ablation at the time of cardiac surgery among patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

The 2017 American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) guidelines support surgical ablation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) owing to a reduction in early mortality and improved overall safety. We explored practice patterns changes and outcomes in patients undergoing concomitant surgical ablation following the guideline change.

Methods

We identified 19,246 patients with preoperative AF who underwent cardiac surgery between 2016 and 2019 from the Florida and Maryland State Inpatient Databases. Rates of surgical ablation by procedure type were temporally trended across years. Secondary outcomes included complications, inpatient mortality, and hospital readmissions. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified patient variables associated with concomitant surgical ablation.

Results

A total of 2738 patients (14.3%) with AF underwent a concomitant surgical ablation. The rate of surgical ablation increased from 2.1% to 17.4% (P < .001) from 2016 to 2017 but remained unchanged thereafter. Postoperative mortality was lower in the surgical ablation cohort (2.7% vs 3.7%; P = .006), although with a higher rate of pacemaker insertion (11.8% vs 7.2%; P < .0001). Patients with a high-risk Elixhauser score (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.95), lower income (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.75), or African American or Hispanic race/ethnicity (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96 and OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96, respectively) had lower odds of undergoing concomitant surgical ablation.

Conclusions

Despite a class I-2a recommendation by the AATS, surgical ablation continues to be underutilized in clinical practice, especially in patients with high-risk comorbidities, with lower incomes, or from minority populations. Surgeons should be mindful of guideline-directed AF management in these vulnerable populations.