Impact of Postoperative Liver Dysfunction on Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Effect of Perioperative Nicorandil on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Retrospective Study

Background

The potential myocardial protective effect of nicorandil (NICD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention has been established. However, its efficacy in the context of cardiac surgery remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the myocardial protective effect of perioperative NICD use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods

We retrospectively gathered data from patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery between 12/2018 and 04/2021 in Fuwai Hospital. Subsequently, the patients were divided into two groups, NICD group and non-nicorandil (non-NICD) group. A 1, 3 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of myocardial injury. The secondary outcomes included the mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, duration of chest drainage, the drainage volume, the total cost, the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the incidence of acute liver injury (ALI). Subsequently, we divided the entire population into two distinct subgroups based on their administration of NICD, and performed a comprehensive subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 2406 patients were ultimately included in the study. After PSM, 250 patients in NICD group and 750 patients in non-NICD group were included in the analysis. Perioperative NICD reduced the incidence of myocardial injury (47.2% versus 38.8%, P=0.025). Our subgroup analysis revealed that preoperative NICD administration not only provided myocardial protection benefits (45.7% vs 35.8%, OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.45-0.97], P=0.041), but also demonstrated statistically significant reduction in ALI, the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The perioperative NICD administration may confer myocardial protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Furthermore, the preoperative utilization of NICD has the potential to mitigate the incidence of postoperative ALI, a reduction in the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage.

Right and left ventricular assist devices are an option for bridge to heart transplant

Background

Patients with a left ventricular assist device with right ventricular failure are prioritized on the heart transplant waitlist; however, their post-transplant survival is less well characterized. We aimed to determine whether pretransplant right ventricular failure affects postoperative survival in patients with a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of the 2005-2018 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry for candidates aged 18 years or more waitlisted for first-time isolated heart transplantation after left ventricular assist device implantation. Candidates were stratified on the basis of having right ventricular failure, defined as the need for right ventricular assist device or intravenous inotropes. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared among the 3 groups, and post-transplant survival was assessed.

Results

Our cohort included 5605 candidates who met inclusion criteria, including 450 patients with right ventricular failure, 344 patients with a left ventricular assist device and intravenous inotropes as a bridge to transplant, 106 patients with a left ventricular assist device and right ventricular assist device, and 5155 patients with a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant without the need for right side support. Compared with patients without right ventricular failure, patients with a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant with right ventricular failure were younger (median age 51 years, 55 vs 56 years, P < .001) and waited less time for organs (median 51 days, 93.5 vs 125 days, P < .001). These patients also had longer post-transplant length of stay (median 18 days, 20 vs 16 days, P < .001). Right ventricular failure was not associated with decreased post-transplant long-term survival on unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis (P = .18). Neither preoperative right ventricular assist device nor intravenous inotropes independently predicted worse survival on multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. However, pretransplant liver dysfunction (total bilirubin >2) was an independent predictor of worse survival (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.17; P < .001), specifically in the left ventricular assist device group and not in the left ventricular assist device + right ventricular assist device/intravenous inotropes group.

Conclusions

Patients with biventricular failure are prioritized on the waiting list, because their critical pretransplant condition has limited impact on their post-transplant survival (short-term effect only); thus, surgeons should be confident to perform transplantation in these severely ill patients. Because liver dysfunction (a surrogate marker of right ventricular failure) was found to affect long-term survival in patients with a left ventricular assist device, surgeons should be encouraged to perform transplantation in these severely ill patients after a recipient's optimization by inotropes or a right ventricular assist device because even when the bilirubin level is elevated in these patients (treated with right ventricular assist device/inotropes), their long-term survival is not affected. Future studies should assess recipients' optimization before organ acceptance to improve long-term survival.

Single-pass albumin dialysis and hemoadsorption for bilirubin and bile acids removal for a child with hyperbilirubinemia after ventricular assist device implantation

We report the successful management of hyperbilirubinemia using two different modalities of extracorporeal bilirubin removal therapy for a pediatric patient. A 13-year-old boy with dilated cardiomyopathy requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) developed acute kidney injury and was dependent on continuous renal replacement therapy. He developed hyperbilirubinemia with a peak total bilirubin level of 786 μmol/L after implantation of biventricular assist device (BiVAD). Extracorporeal bilirubin and bile acids removal using single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) with 4% albumin as dialysate brought down the bilirubin level to 672 μmol/L after 21 h of therapy. Subsequently, he was started on two sessions of hemoadsorption using the Cytosorb® column which further lowered the total bilirubin level to 306 μmol/ in 24 h and 173 μmol/ after the treatment. No complication was encountered. Our case illustrated that both SPAD and hemoadsorption can effectively and safely reduce the serum bilirubin and bile acid levels in pediatric patients with BiVAD implantation. The ease of set-up, faster rate of bilirubin decline and capability of cytokine removal make hemoadsorption a favorable alternative to albumin dialysis.

Early Improvement in Clinical Status Following Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Children: A Marker for Survival

While clinical status at the time of ventricular assist device (VAD) implant can negatively affect outcomes, it is unclear if early improvement after implant can have a positive effect. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to describe the clinical status of pediatric patients supported with a VAD and determine the impact of clinical status on the 1-month follow-up form on survival and ability to discharge. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively by the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support Registry (Pedimacs) Registry. The Pedimacs database was queried for patients implanted between September 19, 2012, and September 30, 2019, who were alive on VAD support at 1-month postimplant on either a paracorporeal pulsatile or intracorporeal continuous device. Four factors on the 1-month follow-up were the focus of this study: mechanical ventilation, supplemental nutritional support, inotropic support, and ambulatory status. These factors were regarded as present if detected between 1-week and 1-month postimplant and were analyzed to determine their impact on survival following 1 month of VAD support and on successful discharge from hospital in patients with implantable continuous-flow devices. The eligible study cohort consisted of 414 patients with a mean age of 9.6 ± 6.2 years, weight of 40.8 ± 32.3 kg with the majority being male (56.7%) and having cardiomyopathy (68%). An isolated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was the most common implant (85.5%). At implant, 40% were ventilated, 57% required nutritional support, 93% were on inotropes, and 58% were nonambulating. On the 1-month postimplant form, there were significant improvements in all four categories (14% ventilator support, 46% nutritional support, 53% on inotropes, and 25% nonambulating). However, there was no significant early change in the percentage of patients requiring supplemental nutrition in the paracorporeal pulsatile devices (88% vs. 82%; p = 0.2). Presence of these clinical parameters in early follow-up postimplant had a significant negative impact on survival and on the ability of patients with continuous-flow devices to be discharged. Presence of four specific clinical parameters early after VAD placement is associated with worse overall survival and an inability to discharge patients on VAD support. Ongoing work is needed for optimization of patients before implant and aggressive rehabilitation after implant to help improve long-term outcomes.

HFA of the ESC position paper on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider Part 3: at the hospital and discharge

The growing population of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)‐supported patients increases the probability of an LVAD‐ supported patient hospitalized in the internal or surgical wards with certain expected device related, and patient‐device interaction complication as well as with any other comorbidities requiring hospitalization. In this third part of the trilogy on the management of LVAD‐supported patients for the non‐LVAD specialist healthcare provider, definitions and structured approach to the hospitalized LVAD‐supported patient are presented including blood pressure assessment, medical therapy of the LVAD supported patient, and challenges related to anaesthesia and non‐cardiac surgical interventions. Finally, important aspects to consider when discharging an LVAD patient home and palliative and end‐of‐life approaches are described.

Using Machine Learning to Predict Postoperative Liver Dysfunction After Aortic Arch Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The study compared machine-learning models with traditional logistic regression to predicting liver outcomes after aortic arch surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective review from January 2013 to May 2017.

SETTING

Fuwai Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 672 consecutive patients who had undergone aortic arch surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Three machine-learning methods were compared with logistic regression with regard to the prediction of postoperative liver dysfunction (PLD) after aortic arch surgery. The perioperative characteristics, including the patients' baseline medical condition and intraoperative data, were analyzed. The performance of the models was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Naïve Bayes had the best discriminative ability for the prediction of PLD (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.77) compared with random forest (0.76), support vector machine (0.73), and logistic regression (0.72). The primary endpoint of PLD was observed in 185 patients (27.5%). The cardiopulmonary bypass time, long surgery time, long aortic clamp time, high preoperative bilirubin value, and low rectal temperature were strongly associated with the development of PLD after aortic arch surgery.

CONCLUSION

The machine-learning method of naïve Bayes predicts PLD after aortic arch surgery significantly better than traditional logistic regression.

Risk of Liver Dysfunction After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Incident liver dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation has been previously associated with adverse outcomes, yet data on perioperative risk markers are sparse.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implant between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution. Perioperative variables were evaluated by univariate modeling and adjusted for false discovery rate. Variables most significantly associated with incident Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-defined liver dysfunction (INT-LD) were evaluated using logistic regression and optimal cutpoints were defined. One-year survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

We included 359 patients (79% male; mean age 59 ± 13 years; 46% ischemic; 64% destination therapy). Lower right ventricular stroke work index at the time of right heart catheterization, higher right atrial pressure 6 hours after right heart catheterization, higher preoperative total bilirubin, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and greater volume of intraoperative ultrafiltration were most strongly associated with incident INT-LD (adjusted P < .01 for each). Initial right ventricular stroke work index less than 460 mm Hg∗mL/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 9.4), 6-hour right heart catheterization 14 mm Hg or greater (OR 4.3; 95% CI, 2.1 to 8.8), cardiopulmonary bypass time longer than 137 minutes (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.2; P < .01 for all), ultrafiltration more than 2.95 L (OR 3.7; 95% CI, 2 to 6.8), and total bilirubin greater than 1.4 mg/dL (OR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5) were each strongly associated with risk of INT-LD, which was associated with decreased unadjusted 1-year survival (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Right ventricular stroke work index, right heart catheterization, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and ultrafiltration were each more strongly associated with elevated risk of INT-LD after left ventricular assist device implant than total bilirubin. Therefore, optimization of right ventricular hemodynamics and minimizing cardiopulmonary bypass time and ultrafiltration could potentially reduce the risk of liver dysfunction, but these observations require prospective validation.