Revision of Failed Prior Nuss in Adult Patients With Pectus Excavatum

Risk Factors and Techniques for Safe Pectus Bar Removal in Adults After Modified Nuss Repair

BACKGROUND

The Nuss repair involves implants designed for removal after 2 to 3 years. Although rare, significant complications can occur with bar removal, and the incidence of these complications may be higher in adults. This study was performed to review complications and risk factors associated with bar removal and discuss strategies to improve operative safety.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed including all patients after pectus excavatum repair who underwent Nuss implant removal at Mayo Clinic Arizona (Phoenix, AZ) from 2013 to 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 1555 bars were removed (683 patients; 71% men; median age, 34 years[(range, 15-71 years]). Of the removals, 12.45% of patients had bars placed at outside institutions. Major complications were rare, with bleeding most common (2.05%), followed by pneumothorax (0.88%), infection (0.59%), and effusions (0.44%). Most major bleeding (85.71%) occurred from the bar track during removal and was controlled by packing the track. One patient required subsequent hematoma evacuation and transfusion. Bleeding secondary to lung injury was also successfully controlled with packing. Bar removal in 1 patient with significantly displaced bars required sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass as a result of aortic injury. Risk factors identified for bleeding included sternal erosion (P < .001), bar migration (P < .001), higher number of bars (P = .037), and revision of a previous pectus repair (P = 0.001). Bar migration was additionally associated with major complications (P < .001). Older age, although a risk factor for overall complications (P = 0.001), was not a risk factor for bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Bar removal can be safely performed in most patients; however, significant complications, including bleeding, may occur. Identifying potential risk factors and being prepared for rescue maneuvers are critical to prevent catastrophic outcomes.

Outcomes of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum in adults

Limited data exist with regard to the outcome of the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum repair in adults. Here, we analysed changes in lung capacity and thoracic morphology based on computed tomography (CT) imaging in adults with pectus excavatum before surgery, during bar insertion and after bar removal. Patients who underwent the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum after the age of 20 were included in this study. Chest CT scans of the included participants were taken before the Nuss procedure, immediately before removal of the pectus bar and 6 months after removal of the pectus bar. Lung capacity and thoracic morphology measurements were made from the CT scans. Six patients aged 24-43 years were included in this study. After the Nuss procedure, lung capacity was decreased in all patients. Although the pectus bar was removed, lung capacity had not significantly increased and was almost the same volume as before the Nuss procedure. After the Nuss procedure, the funnel chest shape had improved in all cases, patients' thoracic spine had also moved forward as the thorax moved forward and patients' stoop had improved. Despite a lack of change in lung capacity, surgical modification should be considered to reduce stress on the thoracic spine and in turn, reduce pain in patients with pectus excavatum. However, further long-term observation seems necessary.

Bone-cartilage proportion in deformed ribs of male pectus excavatum patients

This study verifies the hypothesis that bone/cartilage proportion in deformed ribs of male pectus excavatum patients varies according to their ages. Anatomical evaluation of the thoraces was performed for 79 male pectus excavatum patients, referring to their three-dimensional computer-tomographic images. The patients were divided into Child Group (5-9 years old: n = 35); Adolescent Group (12-15 years old: n = 15) and Adult Group (18+ years old: n = 29). For each patient, the most concave point of the sternum was identified and the pair of ribs closest to the point were defined as Key Ribs. On each Key Rib, the most ventral point was defined as Prominent Point (PP); the junction between the bone and cartilage was defined as Costo-Chondral Junction (CCJ). The distances of these points from the spine were defined as Distance of Prominent Point (DPP) and Distance of Costo-Chondral Junction (DCCJ), respectively. The horizontal length of the Key Rib was defined as Rib Length (RL). Inter- and intra-group comparisons were performed for DPP/RL and DCCJ/RL. Inter-Group Comparison: DCCJ/RL is significantly smaller and DPP/RL is significantly greater in Adult Group than in Child Group, meaning CCJs shift medially and PPs shift laterally as patients get older. Intra-Group Comparison: In Child Group, DCCJ/RL is significantly greater than DPP/RL, meaning CCJs exist lateral to PPs. Contrarily, in Adult Group, DCCJ/RL is significantly smaller than DPP/RL, meaning CCJs exists medial to PPs. Bone/cartilage proportion in the concave part of the chest shifts according to patients' ages. To perform the Nuss procedure effectively, this age-related anatomical change must be taken into consideration.

Elastic stable chest repair and its hybrid variants in 86 patients with pectus excavatum

Background

Complex and mature funnel chest deformities are traditionally managed with open surgical procedures. Elastic stable chest repair (ESCR) has been used successfully and safely for relapse corrections. Does pure plate osteosynthesis in ESCR allow comparable corrective potency and implant safety as hybrid methods with metal bars?

Methods

Data from 86 patients with open funnel chest correction between 2011 and 2015 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Exclusion criteria included being under 12 years of age, and having a history of septic wound healing disorder or other malignant diseases. Main groups consisted of ESCR and hybrid techniques, subgroups were primary and recurrence correction. Correction results and follow-up examinations at six and 12 weeks and at 1 year were statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 38 ESCR and 48 hybrid methods were analyzed. Bar implantation was required in 77% (recurrence 34%) of patients. All patients received plates with different combinations e.g., longitudinal-sternal, costosternal and costo-sterno-costal. In all groups, follow-up uptake showed a funnel chest correction result at the anatomical level with healthy values according to the Haller index (ESCR 4.36-2.84, hybrid 6.99-2.74, P<0.001). No material dislocations were observed in any subgroup.

Conclusions

ESCR and hybrid techniques represent promising and safe therapeutic approaches.

Nuss procedure in the adult population for correction of pectus excavatum

Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum has been successfully modified for use in adult patients. Many patients present in adulthood with progression of symptoms as the chest wall becomes less compliant with age. A thorough workup is completed including echocardiogram and chest CT to evaluate for anatomic abnormalities. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is done to quantify the physiologic impact. Modifications of the original Nuss procedure required to allow for successful adult repair include the use of forced sternal elevation, the use of multiple bars, medial bar fixation, and interspace support to prevent bar rotation and migration. Occasionally, fractures may occur that require an open procedure and osteotomy or cartilage resection and hybrid approach incorporating the principals of intrathoracic support and osteotomy with bar stabilization.