1
|
Ayyad M, Jabri A, Khalefa BB, Al-Abdouh A, Madanat L, Albandak M, Alhuneafat L, Sukhon F, Shahrori Z, Mourid MR, Mhanna M, Giustino G, Wang DD, Hanson ID, Abbas AE, AlQarqaz M, Villablanca P. Efficacy and safety of TAVR versus SAVR in patients with small aortic annuli: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2024:132243. [PMID: 38851542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with a small aortic annulus (SAA) undergoing aortic valve replacement are at increased risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM), which adversely affects outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has shown promise in mitigating PPM compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines to compare clinical outcomes, mortality, and PPM between SAA patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR. Eligible studies were identified through comprehensive literature searches and assessed for quality and relevance. RESULTS Nine studies with a total of 2476 patients were included. TAVR demonstrated similar 30-day and 2-year mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke rates compared to SAVR. However, TAVR showed significant advantages in reducing moderate survival post SAVR, the observed hemodynamic outcomes may potentially contribute to substantial survival variations between TAVR and SAVR during extended follow-up periods.22 Furthermore, previous studies found comparable 30-day and 2-year mortality rates between TAVR and SAVR, with no significant differences across annulus sizes.22, 23 Stroke and myocardial infarction incidences and severe PPM and lowering rates of major bleeding at both 30 days and 2 years. Conversely, SAVR had better outcomes in 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation. Echocardiographic outcomes were comparable between the two interventions. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that both TAVR and SAVR are viable options for treating AS in patients with a small aortic annulus. TAVR offers advantages in reducing PPM and major bleeding, while SAVR performs better in terms of pacemaker implantation. Future studies should focus on comparing newer generation TAVR techniques and devices with SAVR. Consideration of patient characteristics is crucial in selecting the optimal treatment approach for AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Ayyad
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, USA
| | - Ahmad Jabri
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, USA
| | | | - Ahmad Al-Abdouh
- Division of hospital medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Luai Madanat
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, USA
| | - Maram Albandak
- Division of hospital medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Laith Alhuneafat
- Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fares Sukhon
- Heart and Vascular Center, Metrohealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Zaid Shahrori
- Heart and Vascular Center, Metrohealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Marina Ramzy Mourid
- Heart and Vascular Center, Metrohealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Mohammed Mhanna
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa, IA, USA
| | - Gennaro Giustino
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, USA
| | - Dee Dee Wang
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, USA
| | - Ivan D Hanson
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, USA
| | - Amr E Abbas
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, USA
| | - Mohammad AlQarqaz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, USA
| | - Pedro Villablanca
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thourani VH, Abbas AE, Ternacle J, Hahn RT, Makkar R, Kodali SK, George I, Kapadia S, Svensson LG, Szeto WY, Herrmann HC, Ailawadi G, Leipsic J, Blanke P, Webb J, Jaber WA, Russo M, Malaisrie SC, Yadav P, Clavel MA, Khalique OK, Weissman NJ, Douglas P, Bax J, Dahou A, Xu K, Bapat V, Alu MC, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Pibarot P. Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER Trials. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 117:1164-1171. [PMID: 38316377 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective was to compare the impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) for 2 years after surgical aortic valve replacement within the prospective, randomized Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trials. METHODS Surgical aortic valve replacement patients from the PARTNER 1, 2, and 3 trials were included. PPM was classified as moderate (indexed effective orifice area ≤0.85 cm2/m2) or severe (indexed effective orifice area ≤0.65 cm2/m2). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization at 2 years. RESULTS By the predicted PPM method (PPMP), 59.1% had no PPM, 38.8% moderate PPM, and 2.1% severe PPM; whereas by the measured PPM method (PPMM), 42.4% had no PPM, 36.0% moderate, and 21.6% severe. Patients with no PPMP (23.6%) had a lower rate of the primary endpoint compared with patients with moderate (28.2%, P = .03) or severe PPMP (38.8%, P = .02). Using the PPMM method, there was no difference between the no (17.7%) and moderate PPMM groups (21.1%) in the primary outcome (P = .16). However, those with no PPMM or moderate PPMM were improved compared with severe PPMM (27.4%, P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Severe PPM analyzed by PPMP was only 2.1% for surgical aortic valve replacement patients. The PPMM method overestimated the incidence of severe PPM relative to PPMP, but was also associated with worse outcome. There was higher all-cause mortality in patients with severe PPM, thus surgical techniques to minimize PPM remain critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinod H Thourani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Amr E Abbas
- Department of Cardiology, Beaumont Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Julien Ternacle
- Department of Cardiology, Haut-Leveque Cardiology Hospital, Bordeaux University, Pessac, France; Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Rebecca T Hahn
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
| | - Raj Makkar
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Susheel K Kodali
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Isaac George
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lars G Svensson
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Wilson Y Szeto
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Howard C Herrmann
- Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jonathon Leipsic
- Department of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Philipp Blanke
- Department of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - John Webb
- Department of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Wael A Jaber
- Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mark Russo
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - S Chris Malaisrie
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Pradeep Yadav
- Department of Cardiology, Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Marie-Annick Clavel
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Omar K Khalique
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York
| | | | - Pamela Douglas
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeroen Bax
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ke Xu
- Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California
| | - Vinayak Bapat
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Maria C Alu
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
| | - Martin B Leon
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York
| | - Michael J Mack
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Modine T, Forrest JK, Van Mieghem NM, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Ali WB, Tchétché D, Lam KY, Oh JK, Huang J, Mehran R, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Women With Small Annuli at Low or Intermediate Surgical Risk. Am J Cardiol 2024; 223:147-155. [PMID: 38641189 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
There are limited data from randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgery in women with aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli. We evaluated 2-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement to understand acute valve performance and early and midterm clinical outcomes. This post hoc analysis pooled women enrolled in the randomized, prospective, multicenter Evolut Low Risk and Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (SURTAVI) intermediate risk trials. Women with severe aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk who had a computed tomography-measured annular perimeter of ≤72.3 mm were included and underwent self-expanding, supra-annular TAVR or surgery. The primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality or disabling stroke rate. The study included 620 women (323 TAVR, 297 surgery) with a mean age of 78 years. At 2 years, the all-cause mortality or disabling stroke was 6.5% for TAVR and 8.0% for surgery, p = 0.47. Pacemaker rates were 20.0% for TAVR and 8.3% for surgery, p <0.001. The mean effective orifice area at 2 years was 1.9 ± 0.5 cm2 for TAVR and 1.6 ± 0.5 cm2 for surgery and the mean gradient was 8.0 ± 4.1 versus 12.7 ± 6.0 mm Hg, respectively (both p <0.001). Moderate or severe patient-prothesis mismatch at discharge occurred in 10.9% of patients who underwent TAVR and 33.2% of patients who underwent surgery, p <0.001. In conclusion, in women with small annuli, the clinical outcomes to 2 years were similar between self-expanding, supra-annular TAVR and surgery, with better hemodynamics in the TAVR group and fewer pacemakers in the surgical group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Modine
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiologique de Haut Lévèque - (CHU) de Bordeaux, France.
| | - John K Forrest
- Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Michael Deeb
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Riverside Methodist - OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Walid Ben Ali
- Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Didier Tchétché
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Ka Yan Lam
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jae K Oh
- Department of Medicine (Echocardiography), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jian Huang
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Roxana Mehran
- Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodés-Cabau J, Ribeiro HB, Mohammadi S, Serra V, Al-Atassi T, Iñiguez A, Vilalta V, Nombela-Franco L, Sáez de Ibarra Sánchez JI, Auffret V, Forcillo J, Conradi L, Urena M, Moris C, Muñoz-Garcia A, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Kalavrouziotis D, Maria Pomerantzeff P, Rosa VEE, Pezzute Lopes M, Sureda C, Diaz VAJ, Giuliani C, Avvedimento M, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Pibarot P. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation 2024; 149:644-655. [PMID: 37883682 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.067326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus (SAA) remains to be determined. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with a SAA. METHODS This prospective multicenter international randomized trial was performed in 15 university hospitals. Participants were 151 patients with severe aortic stenosis and SAA (mean diameter <23 mm) randomized (1:1) to TAVR (n=77) versus SAVR (n=74). The primary outcome was impaired valve hemodynamics (ie, severe prosthesis patient mismatch or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation) at 60 days as evaluated by Doppler echocardiography and analyzed in a central echocardiography core laboratory. Clinical events were secondary outcomes. RESULTS The mean age of the participants was 75.5±5.1 years, with 140 (93%) women, a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 2.50% (interquartile range, 1.67%-3.28%), and a median annulus diameter of 21.1 mm (interquartile range, 20.4-22.0 mm). There were no differences between groups in the rate of severe prosthesis patient mismatch (TAVR, 4 [5.6%]; SAVR, 7 [10.3%]; P=0.30) and moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (none in both groups). No differences were found between groups in mortality rate (TAVR, 1 [1.3%]; SAVR, 1 [1.4%]; P=1.00) and stroke (TAVR, 0; SAVR, 2 [2.7%]; P=0.24) at 30 days. After a median follow-up of 2 (interquartile range, 1-4) years, there were no differences between groups in mortality rate (TAVR, 7 [9.1%]; SAVR, 6 [8.1%]; P=0.89), stroke (TAVR, 3 [3.9%]; SAVR, 3 [4.1%]; P=0.95), and cardiac hospitalization (TAVR, 15 [19.5%]; SAVR, 15 [20.3%]; P=0.80). CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe aortic stenosis and SAA (women in the majority), there was no evidence of superiority of contemporary TAVR versus SAVR in valve hemodynamic results. After a median follow-up of 2 years, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between groups. These findings suggest that the 2 therapies represent a valid alternative for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis and SAA, and treatment selection should likely be individualized according to baseline characteristics, additional anatomical risk factors, and patient preference. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of the limited sample size leading to an underpowered study, and need to be confirmed in future larger studies. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03383445.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (H.B.R., P.M.P., V.E.E.R., M.P.L.)
| | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Vicenç Serra
- Cardiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain (V.S., C.S.)
| | - Talal Al-Atassi
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (T.A.-A.)
| | - Andres Iñiguez
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain (A.I., V.A.J.D.)
- Cardiovascular Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain (A.I., V.A.J.D.)
| | - Victoria Vilalta
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain (V.V.)
| | - Luis Nombela-Franco
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain (L.N.-F.)
| | | | - Vincent Auffret
- Department of Cardiology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France (V.A.)
| | - Jessica Forcillo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (J.F.)
| | - Lenard Conradi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (L.C.)
| | - Marina Urena
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Bichat Claude-Bernard, Paris, France (M.U.)
| | - Cesar Moris
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain (C.M.)
| | - Antonio Muñoz-Garcia
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, (CIBERCV), Málaga, Spain (A.M.-G.)
| | - Jean-Michel Paradis
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Eric Dumont
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Dimitri Kalavrouziotis
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Pablo Maria Pomerantzeff
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (H.B.R., P.M.P., V.E.E.R., M.P.L.)
| | - Vitor Emer Egypto Rosa
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (H.B.R., P.M.P., V.E.E.R., M.P.L.)
| | - Mariana Pezzute Lopes
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (H.B.R., P.M.P., V.E.E.R., M.P.L.)
| | - Carles Sureda
- Cardiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain (V.S., C.S.)
| | - Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain (A.I., V.A.J.D.)
- Cardiovascular Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain (A.I., V.A.J.D.)
| | - Carlos Giuliani
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Marisa Avvedimento
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Cardiology Department, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada (J.R.-C., S.M., J.-M.P., E.D., D.K., C.G., M.A., E.P.-B., P.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang X, Arslani K, Nuyens P, Montarello NJ, Vanhaverbeke M, Bieliauskas G, Sondergaard L, De Backer O. Contemporary guideline-directed management of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. EUROINTERVENTION 2024; 20:e158-e167. [PMID: 38224253 PMCID: PMC10786179 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-23-00469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are Class Ia recommended therapies for specific subgroups of severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients in the latest 2021 European guidelines. AIMS We aimed to report on the multidisciplinary Heart Team evaluation process and real-world practice of treating severe symptomatic AS in East Denmark in the context of the latest European guideline recommendations. METHODS All consecutive patients with severe AS referred for intervention in 2021 (N=672) were discussed in a multidisciplinary Heart Team meeting. All patients (100%) had a cardiac computed tomography (CT) analysis prior to the meeting. Baseline characteristics, Heart Team decision-making, final treatment and 30-day clinical outcomes were prospectively recorded. RESULTS The majority of severe AS patients (N=456, 68%) were referred for TAVI following discussion in the Heart Team. Ultimately, 94% of patients (N=632) received the Heart Team-recommended treatment. Patients undergoing TAVI (N=439) were significantly older (78.4±6.7 vs 67.2±8.3 years; p<0.001) and more comorbid than patients undergoing SAVR (N=189). The overall 30-day clinical outcomes were satisfactory for both treatment groups (overall 30-day mortality: 1.1%). The mean index hospitalisation length was markedly longer in the SAVR group (8.6±8.3 days) as compared to the TAVI group (1.8±3.2 days). CONCLUSIONS TAVI was routinely performed in low surgical risk patients in 2021 with two-thirds of all severe AS patients undergoing TAVI, thereby applying the latest European guidelines. A dedicated Heart Team meeting, including CT evaluation for all AS patients, is needed to make individualised management decisions in this new era of aortic valve interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Wang
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ketina Arslani
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Philippe Nuyens
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicholas J Montarello
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maarten Vanhaverbeke
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gintautas Bieliauskas
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ole De Backer
- The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown JA, Yousef S, Toma C, Kliner D, Serna-Gallegos D, Makani A, West D, Wang Y, Thoma F, Pompeu Sá M, Sultan I. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves Optimize Transvalvular Hemodynamics Independent of Intra- Versus Supra-Annular Design. Am J Cardiol 2023; 207:48-53. [PMID: 37722201 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
This study sought to characterize transvalvular hemodynamics during the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) across various transcatheter heart valves (THVs), while adjusting for annular dimensions. This was an observational study of TAVIs from September 2021 to October 2022. The primary outcome was mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TVPG), measured using transthoracic echocardiography at day 0, day 1, and day 30 post-TAVI, and were compared across 3 THV, including the self-expandable intra-annular Portico (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) valve, the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 Ultra (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California), and the self-expandable supra-annular Evolut Pro+ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). A total of 560 patients who underwent TAVI were identified, of which 106 (18.9%) received a Portico THV, 176 (31.4%) received a SAPIEN THV, and 278 (49.6%) received an Evolut THV. For Portico THV, the TVPG on day 0 increased from 6.0 (4.7 to 9.0) to 7.0 (6.0 to 10.0) by day 30 (p = 0.009). For SAPIEN THV, the TVPG on day 0 increased from 6.5 (5.0 to 8.0) to 12.0 (9.0 to 15.0) by day 30 (p <0.001). For Evolut THV, the TVPG on day 0 increased from 6.0 (5.0 to 9.0) to 7.2 (5.0 to 10.0) by day 30 (p = 0.001). Adjusting for time and annular diameter in a multivariable mixed effects model, the SAPIEN group had a significantly greater increase in TVPG over time than the Evolut reference group (p <0.001), while there was no difference in the change of TVPG over time for the Portico group vs. the Evolut group (p = 0.874). In conclusion, compared with balloon-expandable valves, self-expanding THV may optimize transvalvular hemodynamics across all annular diameters, independent of their supra-annular and intra-annular design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Brown
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah Yousef
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Catalin Toma
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Dustin Kliner
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Derek Serna-Gallegos
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amber Makani
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David West
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yisi Wang
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Floyd Thoma
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michel Pompeu Sá
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prieto-Lobato A, Nuche J, Avvedimento M, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Kalavrouziotis D, Mohammadi S, Rodés-Cabau J. Managing the challenge of a small aortic annulus in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2023; 21:747-761. [PMID: 37869793 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2271395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Small aortic annulus (SAA) poses a challenge in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement - both surgical and transcatheter - since it has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. AREAS COVERED This review aims to comprehensively summarize the available evidence regarding the management of aortic stenosis in patients with SAA and discuss the current controversies as well as future perspectives in this field. EXPERT OPINION It is paramount to agree in a common definition for diagnosing and properly treating SAA patients, and for that purpose, multidetector computer tomography is essential. The results of recent trials led to the expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement among patients of all the surgical-risk spectrum, and the choice of treatment (transcatheter, surgical) should be based on patient comorbidities, anatomical characteristics, and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Prieto-Lobato
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jorge Nuche
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Marisa Avvedimento
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | - Eric Dumont
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | | - Siamak Mohammadi
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Josep Rodés-Cabau
- Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abushouk AI, Spilias N, Isogai T, Kansara T, Agrawal A, Hariri E, Abdelfattah O, Krishnaswamy A, Reed GW, Puri R, Yun J, Kapadia S. Three-Year Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation According to Annular Size. Am J Cardiol 2023; 194:9-16. [PMID: 36921423 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Data on the association between annular size and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes beyond 1 year are limited. The present study assessed the association between the aortic annulus size and TAVI clinical and hemodynamic outcomes at 3 years of follow-up. Patients were classified according to the aortic annulus size as having small, intermediate, and large annuli (size <400, 400 to 574, and ≥575 mm2, respectively). The co-primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Further, the changes in hemodynamic outcomes over the follow-up period (median 37, interquartile range: 26 to 45 months) were assessed. The present analysis included 850 patients, with 182 patients (21.4%), 538 patients (63.3%), and 130 patients (15.3%) in the small, intermediate, and large-sized aortic annulus groups, respectively. The groups had comparable age and pre-TAVI pressure gradients; however, patients with small annuli had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores. Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that compared to patients with intermediate-sized annuli, patients with small and large annuli had similar all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.69 and HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16, respectively) and heart failure hospitalization rates (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.69 and HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.17, respectively). However, patients with small annuli had consistently higher mean and peak pressure gradients and a higher risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. The risks of moderate-to-severe regurgitation and structural valve deterioration were similar between the three groups. In conclusion, although patients with small annuli had higher transvalvular gradients, there was no significant association between the aortic annulus size and TAVI clinical outcomes at 3 years of follow-up. Future studies should compare the performance of transcatheter valve types in patients with different aortic annulus sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdelrahman I Abushouk
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nikolaos Spilias
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Toshiaki Isogai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tikal Kansara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Union Hospital, Dover, Ohio
| | - Ankit Agrawal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Essa Hariri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Omar Abdelfattah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amar Krishnaswamy
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Grant W Reed
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rishi Puri
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - James Yun
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miyasaka M, Tada N. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2022; 37:615-625. [PMID: 35708855 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-022-00865-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), first described in 1978, occurs when a prosthetic valve functions normally, but has an effective orifice area that is too small relative to the patient's body surface area. It results in residual left ventricular afterload and higher transvalvular pressure gradient, which has been considered to impair prognosis. PPM following surgical aortic replacement is reportedly associated with worse clinical outcomes, such as high mortality. However, the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. There is conflicting evidence on the impact of PPM following TAVI due to differences across studies in terms of follow-up period, methods, patient populations, and type of bioprosthetic valve. The present review summarizes the most recent evidence on PPM after TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Miyasaka
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. .,Cardiovascular Center, Sendai Kosei Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
| | - Norio Tada
- Cardiovascular Center, Sendai Kosei Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Wu C, Hahn RT, Tang GHL, Abbas AE, Playford D, Ruel M, Jilaihawi H, Sathananthan J, Wood DA, De Paulis R, Bax JJ, Rodes-Cabau J, Cameron DE, Chen T, Del Nido PJ, Dweck MR, Kaneko T, Latib A, Moat N, Modine T, Popma JJ, Raben J, Smith RL, Tchetche D, Thomas MR, Vincent F, Yoganathan A, Zuckerman B, Mack MJ, Leon MB. Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Hemodynamics: Definitions, Outcomes, and Evidence Gaps: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80:527-544. [PMID: 35902177 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
A virtual workshop was organized by the Heart Valve Collaboratory to identify areas of expert consensus, areas of disagreement, and evidence gaps related to bioprosthetic aortic valve hemodynamics. Impaired functional performance of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse patient outcomes; however, this assessment is complicated by the lack of standardization for labelling, definitions, and measurement techniques, both after surgical and transcatheter valve replacement. Echocardiography remains the standard assessment methodology because of its ease of performance, widespread availability, ability to do serial measurements over time, and correlation with outcomes. Management of a high gradient after replacement requires integration of the patient's clinical status, physical examination, and multimodality imaging in addition to shared patient decisions regarding treatment options. Future priorities that are underway include efforts to standardize prosthesis sizing and labelling for both surgical and transcatheter valves as well as trials to characterize the consequences of adverse hemodynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard C Herrmann
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Department of Medicine, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Changfu Wu
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca T Hahn
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Amr E Abbas
- Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - David Playford
- The University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marc Ruel
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hasan Jilaihawi
- Heart Valve Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Janarthanan Sathananthan
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David A Wood
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Jeroen J Bax
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Josep Rodes-Cabau
- Department of Medicine, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Duke E Cameron
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tiffany Chen
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pedro J Del Nido
- Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marc R Dweck
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Tsuyoshi Kaneko
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Azeem Latib
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Neil Moat
- Abbott Structural Heart, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | - Thomas Modine
- Hopital Cardiologique de Haut Leveque, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Jamie Raben
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert L Smith
- Baylor Scott and White, The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ajit Yoganathan
- Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Bram Zuckerman
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael J Mack
- Baylor Scott and White, The Heart Hospital, Plano, Texas, USA
| | - Martin B Leon
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chiarito M, Spirito A, Nicolas J, Selberg A, Stefanini G, Colombo A, Reimers B, Kini A, Sharma SK, Dangas GD, Mehran R. Evolving Devices and Material in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: What to Use and for Whom. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154445. [PMID: 35956061 PMCID: PMC9369546 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis, providing a viable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients deemed to be at prohibitive surgical risk, but also for selected patients at intermediate or low surgical risk. Nonetheless, there still exist uncertainties regarding the optimal management of patients undergoing TAVR. The selection of the optimal bioprosthetic valve for each patient represents one of the most challenging dilemmas for clinicians, given the large number of currently available devices. Limited follow-up data from landmark clinical trials comparing TAVR with SAVR, coupled with the typically elderly and frail population of patients undergoing TAVR, has led to inconclusive data on valve durability. Recommendations about the use of one device over another in given each patient’s clinical and procedural characteristics are largely based on expert consensus. This review aims to evaluate the available evidence on the performance of different devices in the presence of specific clinical and anatomic features, with a focus on patient, procedural, and device features that have demonstrated a relevant impact on the risk of poor hemodynamic valve performance and adverse clinical events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Chiarito
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (B.R.)
| | - Alessandro Spirito
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
| | - Johny Nicolas
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
| | - Alexandra Selberg
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
| | - Giulio Stefanini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (B.R.)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonio Colombo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (B.R.)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Bernhard Reimers
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (B.R.)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Annapoorna Kini
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
| | - Samin K. Sharma
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
| | - George D. Dangas
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
| | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.C.); (J.N.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (A.K.); (S.K.S.); (G.D.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(212)-659-9649; Fax: +1-(646)-537-8547
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scotti A, Fovino LN, Coisne A, Fabris T, Cardaioli F, Massussi M, Rodinò G, Barolo A, Boiago M, Continisio S, Montonati C, Sciarretta T, Zuccarelli V, Bernardini V, Masiero G, Napodano M, Fraccaro C, Marchese A, Esposito G, Granada JF, Latib A, Iliceto S, Tarantini G. 10-Year Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Leaflet Design (Intra- Versus Supra-Annular) in Mortality and Hemodynamic Performance. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:924958. [PMID: 35757343 PMCID: PMC9215259 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.924958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) leaflet design on long-term device performance is still unknown. This study sought to compare the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of intra- (IA) versus supra-annular (SA) TAVR designs up-to 10-years following implantation. Methods Consecutive patients with at least 5-years follow-up following TAVR for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis from June 2007 to December 2016 were included. Bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) and hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD) were defined according to VARC-3 updated definitions and estimated using cumulative incidence function to account for the competing risk of death. Results A total of 604 patients (82 years; 53% female) were analyzed and divided into IA (482) and SA (122) groups. Overall survival rates at 10-years were similar (IA 15%, 95%CI: 10–22; SA 11%, 95%CI: 6–20; p = 0.21). Compared to the SA TAVR, mean transaortic gradients were significantly higher and increased over time in the IA group. IA TAVRs showed higher 10-year cumulative incidences of BVF (IA 8% vs. SA 1%, p = 0.02) and severe HVD (IA 5% vs. SA 1%, p = 0.05). The occurrence of BVF and HVD in the IA group occurred primarily in the smallest TAVR devices (20–23-mm). After excluding these sizes, the cumulative incidences of BVF (IA 5% vs. SA 1%, p = 0.40) and severe HVD (IA 2% vs. SA 1%, p = 0.11) were similar. Conclusion In this study, TAVR leaflet design had no impact on survival at 10-years. IA devices showed higher transaortic gradients and cumulative incidences of HVD and BVF predominantly occurring in the smallest valve sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Scotti
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, United States
| | - Luca Nai Fovino
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Augustin Coisne
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, United States
| | - Tommaso Fabris
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesco Cardaioli
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Mauro Massussi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Giulio Rodinò
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto Barolo
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Mauro Boiago
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Saverio Continisio
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Carolina Montonati
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Tommaso Sciarretta
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Vittorio Zuccarelli
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Valentina Bernardini
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Giulia Masiero
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Napodano
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Fraccaro
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Alfredo Marchese
- Unit of Cardiology, GVM Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanni Esposito
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Juan F. Granada
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, United States
| | - Azeem Latib
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Sabino Iliceto
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giuseppe Tarantini,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Siddique S, Khanal R, Vora AN, Gada H. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Optimization Strategies: Cusp Overlap, Commissural Alignment, Sizing, and Positioning. US CARDIOLOGY REVIEW 2022. [DOI: 10.15420/usc.2021.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) rapidly expands to younger patients and those at low surgical risk, there is a compelling need to identify patients at increased risk of post-procedural complications, such as paravalvular leak, prosthesis–patient mismatch, and conduction abnormalities. This review highlights the incidence and risk factors of these procedural complications, and focuses on novel methods to reduce them by using newer generation transcatheter heart valves and the innovative cusp-overlap technique, which provides optimal fluoroscopic imaging projection to allow for precise implantation depth which minimizes interaction with the conduction system. Preserving coronary access after TAVR is another important consideration in younger patients. This paper reviews the significance of commissural alignment to allow coronary cannulation after TAVR and discusses recently published data on modified delivery techniques to improve commissural alignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saima Siddique
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Heart and Vascular Institute, Harrisburg, PA
| | - Resha Khanal
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Heart and Vascular Institute, Harrisburg, PA
| | - Amit N Vora
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Heart and Vascular Institute, Harrisburg, PA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Hemal Gada
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Heart and Vascular Institute, Harrisburg, PA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xuan Y, Dvir D, Wisneski AD, Wang Z, Ye J, Guccione JM, Ge L, Tseng EE. Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Size on Leaflet Stresses: Implications for Durability and Optimal Grey Zone Sizing. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:64-71. [PMID: 34708162 DOI: 10.4244/aij-d-19-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Aims As indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continue to expand towards younger and lower-risk patients, durability becomes an increasingly important question. Durability decreases as leaflet stresses increase, but the impact of transcatheter heart valve (THV) size on stress is unknown. Patient annulus sizes can fall within "grey zones" between 2 TAVR sizes. Our aim was to examine the impact of balloon-expandable THV size on leaflet stresses. Methods and Results SapienXT 23mm, 26mm, and 29mm sizes (Edwards Lifesciences, Inc) underwent micro-computed tomography scanning to create THV computational models then loaded to systemic pressure using finite element software. THV leaflet maximum principal stresses were 1.69MPa (23mm), 1.70MPa (26mm), and 2.12MPa (29mm) at mean arterial pressure. For intermediate annulus sizes, undersizing the larger THV yielded lower leaflet stresses than oversizing the smaller THV. Conclusions Increasing THV size yielded greater leaflet maximum principal stresses, which could suggest a relationship between THV size and long-term durability.. For annulus "grey zones" sizes, undersizing the larger THV resulted in lower leaflet stresses than oversizing the smaller THV. These results may influence optimal device sizing, as THV durability remains an important, unanswered question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Xuan
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Centers, San Francisco, CA
| | - Danny Dvir
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew D Wisneski
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Centers, San Francisco, CA
| | - Zhongjie Wang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Centers, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jian Ye
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Julius M Guccione
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Centers, San Francisco, CA
| | - Liang Ge
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Centers, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elaine E Tseng
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Centers, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asian Patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 114:1612-1619. [PMID: 34678284 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and its impact following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding valves in Asian population. We aimed to assess post-procedural effective orifice area with standardized methods and the impact of PPM on mid-term outcomes after CoreValve/Evolut R implantation in Asian population. METHODS Among 201 consecutive patients undergoing CoreValve/Evolut R implantation, PPM was assessed at 30 days and defined based on core lab-measured indexed effective orifice area as severe (< 0.65 cm2/m2) or moderate (0.65 to 0.85 cm2/m2). Multivariable regression models were utilized to examine predictors of PPM as well as mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure at mid-term follow-up. RESULTS Moderate and severe PPM were observed following self-expanding valves in 37 (18.4%) and 3 (1.5%) patients, respectively. These 40 patients were included in the PPM group. Predictors of PPM included female, larger body surface area, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. At mid-term (median 30.4 months, interquartile range 17.0 to 57.8 months) follow-up, patients with PPM had an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.53; P = 0.027), cardiovascular mortality (aHR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.04 to 10.99; P = 0.043), and rehospitalization for heart failure (aHR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.11 to 5.17; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS PPM was associated with higher mid-term mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure in Asian population. The expected post-procedural effective orifice area for any given valve size may be helpful in pre-procedural decision-making to avoid PPM.
Collapse
|
16
|
Okajima K, Komatsu I, Seto TB. Low Incidence of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Extremely Small Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with 20-mm Sapien 3. Int J Angiol 2021; 31:120-125. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractTranscatheter aortic valve replacement has been developed as an emerging technique to treat patients with aortic valve disease. However, safety and outcome data on extremely small transcatheter heart valves (THV) is limited. We aimed to assess hemodynamic profiles and clinical outcome of very small balloon expandable THVs with 20-mm Sapien 3 (SP3).We examined data for all patients who received third-generation SP3 THV at a single hospital. Complications and clinical outcomes were defined based on the VARC-2 criteria. Postoperative prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was defined as indexed effective orifice area (EOA) < 0.85 cm2/m2. We compared clinical characteristics and outcome between patients with 20-mm (n = 21), 23-mm (n = 67), and 26- or 29-mm (n = 113) sized valves.The 20-mm group included significantly higher number of Asian and female populations with lower body surface area. The baseline CT annular area in the 20-mm group was 316.5 ± 24.9 mm2. There was no significant difference between groups in procedural mortality or early safety at 30 days. The higher procedural complication was observed in 20-mm group due to significant differences in minor vascular and bleeding complications. Despite higher post-THV gradients and smaller indexed EOA in 20-mm group, no PPM was observed in 20-mm group. The mortality at 30 days and 1 year in 20-mm group was 4.8% and 16.7%, respectively.The patients who received very small THVs with 20-mm SP3 did not result in PPM and experienced favorable early safety and midterm outcome in our cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazue Okajima
- Department of Cardiology, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii
- Department of Cardiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas
| | - Ikki Komatsu
- Department of Cardiology, Queens Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B. Seto
- Department of Cardiology, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii
- Department of Cardiology, Queens Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Okita Y, Fujita T, Zaikokuji K, Nakajima H, Yamanaka K, Fukumura Y, Yamaguchi A, Murakami H, Yaku H, Gearhart E, Komiya T. Two-Year Results of the 17-mm Avalus Aortic Valve in the PERIGON Japan Trial. Circ J 2021; 85:1035-1041. [PMID: 33776017 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-20-1024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PERIcardial SurGical AOrtic Valve ReplacemeNt (PERIGON) Japan Trial was developed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the 17-mm Avalus bioprosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.Methods and Results:The primary endpoint in the trial was the percentage of patients achieving the composite of at least 1 class improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 1 year compared with baseline and effective orifice area index (EOAI) of 0.6 cm2/m2or greater at 1-year after implantation, compared with a performance goal of 60%. The present study reports outcomes through 2 years. Eleven patients were implanted (10 [91%] female, median age 78.3 years). From baseline to 1 year, 10 subjects (91%) showed an improvement in NYHA classification. At 1 year, mean (±SD) EOAI was 0.82±0.17 cm2/m2, with 10 patients (91%) having an EOAI ≥0.6 cm2/m2. As such, 9 of 11 patients (82%) successfully met the primary endpoint. One death occurred between the 1- and 2-year follow-up visits, unrelated to the valve. There were no valve reinterventions, explants, or device deficiencies through 2 years. CONCLUSIONS The PERIGON Japan Trial met its primary endpoint. Surgical implantation of the 17-mm Avalus aortic bioprosthesis can be performed with an acceptable incidence of device-related adverse events, and the valve performs effectively based on echocardiographic findings.
Collapse
|
18
|
Leone PP, Fazzari F, Cannata F, Sanz-Sanchez J, Mangieri A, Monti L, Cozzi O, Stefanini GG, Bragato R, Colombo A, Reimers B, Regazzoli D. Clinical and Technical Challenges of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:670457. [PMID: 34150868 PMCID: PMC8211887 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.670457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is present when the effective area of a prosthetic valve inserted into a patient is inferior to that of a normal human valve; the hemodynamic consequence of a valve too small compared with the size of the patient's body is the generation of higher than expected transprosthetic gradients. Despite evidence of increased risk of short- and long-term mortality and of structural valve degeneration in patients with PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement, its clinical impact in patients subject to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is yet unclear. We aim to review and update on the definition and incidence of PPM after TAVI, and its prognostic implications in the overall population and in higher-risk subgroups, such as small aortic annuli or valve-in-valve procedures. Last, we will focus on the armamentarium available in order to reduce risk of PPM when planning a TAVI procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Pasquale Leone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.,Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Cannata
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.,Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Jorge Sanz-Sanchez
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.,Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | - Ottavia Cozzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.,Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giulio Giuseppe Stefanini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.,Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leone PP, Regazzoli D, Pagnesi M, Sanz-Sanchez J, Chiarito M, Cannata F, Van Mieghem NM, Barbanti M, Tamburino C, Teles R, Adamo M, Miura M, Maisano F, Kim WK, Bedogni F, Stefanini G, Mangieri A, Giannini F, Colombo A, Reimers B, Latib A. Predictors and Clinical Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Self-Expandable TAVR in Small Annuli. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:1218-1228. [PMID: 34112458 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to define predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and its impact on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expandable valves (SEVs) in patients with small annuli. BACKGROUND TAVR seems to reduce the risk for PPM compared with surgical aortic valve replacement, especially in patients with small aortic annuli. Nevertheless, predictors and impact of PPM in this population have not been clarified yet. METHODS Predictors of PPM and all-cause mortality were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis from the cohort of the TAVI-SMALL (International Multicenter Registry to Evaluate the Performance of Self-Expandable Valves in Small Aortic Annuli) registry, which included patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annuli (annular perimeter <72 mm or area <400 mm2 on computed tomography) treated with transcatheter SEVs: 445 patients with (n = 129) and without (n = 316) PPM were enrolled. RESULTS Intra-annular valves conferred increased risk for PPM (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 4.81), while post-dilation (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25-0.84) and valve oversizing (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.28-1.00) seemed to protect against PPM occurrence. At a median follow-up of 354 days, patients with severe PPM, but not those with moderate PPM, had a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with those without PPM (log-rank p = 0.008). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed severe PPM as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 4.27; 95% CI: 1.34 to 13.6). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic annuli undergoing transcatheter SEV implantation, use of intra-annular valves yielded higher risk for PPM; conversely, post-dilation and valve oversizing protected against PPM occurrence. Severe PPM was independently associated with all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Pasquale Leone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Pagnesi
- Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Chiarito
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Cannata
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Barbanti
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Centro Alte Specialità e Trapianti, P.O.G. Rodolico, A.O.U. Policlinico-V. Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Corrado Tamburino
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Centro Alte Specialità e Trapianti, P.O.G. Rodolico, A.O.U. Policlinico-V. Emanuele, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Rui Teles
- Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marianna Adamo
- Civil Hospital and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mizuki Miura
- Cardiac Surgery, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Won-Keun Kim
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff Heart and Lung Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Francesco Bedogni
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Stefanini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Colombo
- Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Bernhard Reimers
- Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Azeem Latib
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Eng MH, Abbas AE, Hahn RT, Lee J, Wang DD, Eleid MF, O'Neill WW. Real world outcomes using 20 mm balloon expandable SAPIEN 3/ultra valves compared to larger valves (23, 26, and 29 mm)-a propensity matched analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 98:1185-1192. [PMID: 33984182 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND Small balloon expandable valves have higher echocardiographic transvalvular gradients and rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) compared to larger valves. However, the impact of these echocardiographic findings on clinical outcomes is unknown. We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of 20 mm SAPIEN 3 (S3 BEV) compared to larger S3 BEV in relation to echocardiographic hemodynamics. METHODS Using the STS/ACC transcatheter valve registry, we performed a propensity-matched comparison of patients undergoing treatment of native aortic valve stenosis using transfemoral, balloon-expandable implantation of 20 mm and ≥ 23 mm S3 BEVs. Baseline and procedure characteristics, echocardiographic variables and survival were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 1-year mortality. RESULTS After propensity matching of the 20 mm and ≥ 23 mm SAPIEN 3 valves, 3,931 pairs with comparable baseline characteristics were identified. Small valves were associated with significantly higher echocardiographic gradients at discharge (15.7 ± 7.1 mmHg vs. 11.7 ± 5.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and severe PPM rates (21.5% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in 1-year all-cause mortality (20 mm: 13.0% vs. ≥23 mm: 12.7%, p = 0.72) or other major adverse event rates and outcomes between the two cohorts. Based on a multivariable analysis, elevated discharge mean gradient (>20 mmHg), severe PPM and the use of 20 mm versus ≥23 mm were not independent predictors of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION SAPIEN 3 20 mm valves were associated with higher echocardiographic gradients, and severe PPM rates compared to larger valves but these factors were not associated with significant differences in 1-year all-cause mortality or rehospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin H Eng
- Department of Medicine, Center for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Amr E Abbas
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Rebecca T Hahn
- New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Lee
- Department of Medicine, Center for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Dee Dee Wang
- Department of Medicine, Center for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mackram F Eleid
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William W O'Neill
- Department of Medicine, Center for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Supra-Annular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021; 14:964-976. [PMID: 33958170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in the TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry in patients undergoing supra-annular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for de novo stenosis or failed surgical bioprostheses (transcatheter aortic valve [TAV]-in-surgical aortic valve [SAV]). BACKGROUND Severe PPM has been associated with adverse outcomes following TAVR, yet the clinical outcome of severe PPM after supra-annular TAVR is largely unknown. METHODS Supra-annular TAVR was performed in patients enrolled in the TVT Registry with de novo stenosis (n = 42,174) or TAV-in-SAV (n = 5,446). Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria were used to define severe PPM. The clinical impact of severe PPM on 1-year mortality and valve-related readmission was assessed using multivariate regression. A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate predictors of severe PPM. RESULTS Severe PPM was found in 5.3% of patients undergoing de novo TAVR and 27.0% of patients undergoing TAV-in-SAV. The presence of severe PPM was not significantly associated with 1-year mortality or valve-related readmissions in both groups. Mean aortic gradients were higher in patients with severe PPM than in those without severe PPM at 1 month (9.7 ± 5.7 mm Hg vs. 7.3 ± 4.0 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and 1 year (10.2 ± 6.4 mm Hg vs. 8.0 ± 4.3 mm Hg; p < 0.001). Pre-procedural factors, including a <20-mm aortic annulus, were positive predictors of severe PPM in patients undergoing de novo TAVR (area under the curve = 0.795) and TAV-in-SAV (area under the curve = 0.764). CONCLUSIONS Severe PPM after supra-annular TAVR was not associated with increased 1-year mortality or valve-related readmissions. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine if higher residual gradients in patients with severe PPM predict long-term outcomes. (STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry [TVT Registry]; NCT01737528).
Collapse
|
22
|
Early and mid-term results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and valve durability assessment. Heart Vessels 2021; 36:1566-1573. [PMID: 33871699 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01842-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to assess valve durability. A total of 146 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for severe aortic stenosis between October 2013 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients (mean age, 84 ± 6 years; age range 53-98 years; 42 males [28.7%]) had multiple comorbidities, with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 30.9 ± 17.4%. Eighteen patients (12.3%) were aged 90 years or over. Five in-hospital deaths (3.4%) occurred, and 36 patients (24.7%) experienced major TAVI-related complications. With the transfemoral approach, 10 patients had major vascular complications, which mostly occurred with first-generation devices (n = 9) but less commonly with new-generation low-profile devices (P = 0.0078). During a follow-up period of 580 ± 450 (11-1738) days, 29 late deaths occurred. The survival rate was 86.0%, 78.0%, and 61.7% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that more-than-moderate tricuspid regurgitation was the only independent risk factor for late deaths due to any cause (hazard ratio, 3.145; 95% confidence interval, 1.129-8.762; P = 0.0283). No statistically significant differences between post-TAVI before discharge from the hospital and at 4 years after TAVI were observed with respect to aortic valve area (1.76 ± 0.49 cm2 vs. 1.64 ± 0.38 cm2; P = 0.1871) and mean pressure gradient (10.0 ± 4.6 mmHg vs. 7.9 ± 3.3 mmHg; P = 0.5032). TAVI was a feasible method with acceptable early and mid-term outcomes and valve durability for at least 4 years in poor-risk patients. Further close follow-up is essential to evaluate late outcomes and valve durability.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, Wegermann ZK, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Fallon JM, Brennan JM, Thourani VH, Badhwar V, Ailawadi G. Aortic Annular Enlargement in the Elderly: Short and Long-Term Outcomes in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112:1160-1166. [PMID: 33421392 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient prosthesis mismatch is associated with significant long-term morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement, but the role and outcomes of annular enlargement (AE) remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that increasing rates of AE may lead to improved outcomes for patients at risk for severe patient prosthesis mismatch. METHODS Patients over age 65 years undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting from 2008-2016 in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database with matching Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data were included (n=189,268). Univariate, multivariate, and time-to-event analysis was used to evaluate the association between AE and early and late outcomes. Patients were stratified by projected degree of patient prosthesis mismatch based on calculated effective orifice area index. RESULTS A total of 5412 (2.9%) patients underwent AE. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database-predicted mortality was similar between AE and non-AE groups (2.97% vs 2.99%, P = .052). Patients undergoing AE had higher risk-adjusted rates of 30-day complications and death (5.4% vs 3.4%, P < .0001), but no differences in long-term rates of stroke, heart failure re-hospitalization,s or aortic valve reoperation. Survival analysis demonstrated a higher risk of mortality with AE during the first 3 years, after which the survival curves cross, favoring AE. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that annular enlargement during surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with increased short-term risk in a Medicare population. Survival curves crossed after 3 years, which may portend a benefit in select patients. However, annular enlargement is still only performed in the minority of patients who are at risk for patient prosthesis mismatch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hunter Mehaffey
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| | - Robert B Hawkins
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | | | - John M Fallon
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - J Matthew Brennan
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Vinod H Thourani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Vinay Badhwar
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Gorav Ailawadi
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kaewkes D, Ochiai T, Flint N, Patel V, Mahani S, Raschpichler M, Yoon SH, Skaf S, Singh S, Chakravarty T, Nakamura M, Cheng W, Makkar R. Outcomes of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Obstruction Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2020; 133:105-115. [PMID: 32811649 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.07.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Scarce data exist on clinical features and prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), concomitant with left ventricular obstruction (LVO). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes in patients with severe AS and LVO undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Consecutive patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI between January 2013 to December 2017 at our institution were included. Significant LVO was defined as resting peak left ventricular (LV) systolic gradient ≥30 mm Hg on pre-TAVI echocardiography. We analyzed the primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure (HHF) at 1-year in patients with LVO and those without LVO in the overall and propensity-matched populations. Among 1,729 patients who underwent TAVI, significant LVO was observed in 31 (1.8%) patients. This group was more likely to be female, had smaller aortic annulus and LV cavity, and received a smaller size of the transcatheter heart valve. The most common phenotype of LV hypertrophy causing LVO was concentric LV hypertrophy (58%), and mid-LV obstruction was more common than LV outflow tract obstruction (77% vs 23%, respectively). After adjustment for baseline differences, the primary outcome was not significantly different between patients with LVO and those without LVO (15% vs 16%, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.19 to 3.72; p = 0.809). In conclusion, in patients undergoing TAVI, concomitant LVO was relatively uncommon and occurred more often at mid-LV. The presence of pre-TAVI LVO was not associated with worse outcomes defined as increase all-cause mortality or HHF at 1-year.
Collapse
|
25
|
Head SJ, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Gleason TG, Williams MR, Radhakrishnan S, Fremes S, Oh JK, Chang Y, Boulware MJ, Kappetein AP. Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 12:e007396. [PMID: 30929507 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.118.007396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemodynamic performance of prostheses after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is generally better than after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), especially in patients with a small native annulus size. However, it remains unclear whether differences are consistent for patients with a different propensity for developing prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), considering annulus size and body size of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS The SURTAVI trial (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Implantation) compared TAVR using a self-expandable valve with SAVR in intermediate-risk patients. Multidetector computed tomography-based aortic annulus size consisted of the perimeter-derived diameter, which was divided by body surface area to produce an indexed annulus size. Patients were categorized into a small (9-12 mm/m2), medium (>12-14 mm/m2), and large (>14-18 mm/m2) group according to indexed annulus size. We compared TAVR and SAVR for PPM, hemodynamics, and clinical, and functional outcomes through 1-year follow-up within the size groups. Patients who underwent TAVR received a larger prosthesis with increasing indexed annulus size ( P<0.001), while there was no difference in prosthesis size in patients who underwent SAVR ( P=0.74). Patients in all size groups had significantly larger indexed effective orifice area and lower mean gradients at discharge after TAVR versus SAVR. Rates of PPM were significantly lower with TAVR versus SAVR in all groups ( P<0.001) and declined with larger indexed annulus sizes with both TAVR ( P=0.04) and SAVR ( P=0.03). Indexed annulus size was an independent predictor of PPM after TAVR and SAVR. Clinical outcomes were comparable between TAVR and SAVR across all groups, apart from a significantly higher rate of reintervention after TAVR versus SAVR in the large indexed annulus size group (2.5% versus 0%; P=0.01) but without significant interaction ( Pint=0.81). CONCLUSIONS Rates of PPM were significantly lower after TAVR than after SAVR across all groups of indexed annulus size, reflecting better hemodynamic performance of transcatheter versus surgical valves, irrespective of the propensity to develop PPM. More attention should be directed to prevention of PPM after SAVR. This information should be considered by the Heart Team to recommend a specific procedure or valve. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01586910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Head
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (S.J.H., A.P.K) at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, TX (M.J.R.)
| | - G Michael Deeb
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor (G.M.D.)
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Cardiology (N.M.v.M) at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.J.P.)
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA (T.G.G.)
| | - Mathew R Williams
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University-Langone Medical Center (M.R.W.)
| | - Sam Radhakrishnan
- Cardiology (S.R.) at Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Fremes
- Division of Cardiac Surgery (S.F) at Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jae K Oh
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.K.O.)
| | - Yanping Chang
- Department of Statistical Services, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN (Y.C., M.J.B., A.P.K.)
| | - Michael J Boulware
- Department of Statistical Services, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN (Y.C., M.J.B., A.P.K.)
| | - Arie Pieter Kappetein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (S.J.H., A.P.K) at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Statistical Services, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN (Y.C., M.J.B., A.P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Deeb GM, Popma JJ, Chetcuti SJ, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gleason TG, Williams MR, Gada H, Oh JK, Li S, Boulware MJ, Kappetein AP, Reardon MJ. Computed Tomography Annular Dimensions: A Novel Method to Compare Prosthetic Valve Hemodynamics. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110:1502-1510. [PMID: 32289296 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cardiac Surgical Societies Valve Labeling Task Force consensus document acknowledged inconsistent sizing and labeling of prosthetic heart valves. This study compared the labeled size, internal diameter, and hemodynamics of different surgical and transcatheter valve types implanted into the same size annulus, measured by preprocedural computed tomography (CT). METHODS Patients were retrospectively sorted into 3 CT annular diameter size groups: small (less than 23 mm), medium (23 to less than 26 mm), and large (26 mm or greater). Surgical valves were sorted into 4 categories based on tissue and design: (stentless porcine, standard stented bovine, wraparound stented bovine, and stented porcine). Comparisons were made within the surgical types and with a transcatheter valve. Echocardiograms were independently assessed and CTs were centrally measured. RESULTS We analyzed 726 surgical and 923 transcatheter valve paired data sets. Among the various valve types implanted into the same size CT annulus, there were significant differences regarding size, internal diameter, and hemodynamics within all 3 size groups. Root enlargement procedures occurred in 1.2% with no differences across valve types or size groups. Transcatheter valve hemodynamics were similar to stentless valves and were significantly better than all stented valves. There was no difference in hemodynamics between the 2 bovine stented valve types, and stented porcine valves were inferior to all valve types. CONCLUSIONS This study documents that prosthetic heart valve sizing and labeling inconsistencies exist. Use of preoperative CT annular dimensions is the most accurate method to compare size, internal diameter, and hemodynamics of bioprosthetic aortic valves because it compares values among various valve types implanted into the same size annulus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Michael Deeb
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stanley J Chetcuti
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Interventional Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Riverside Methodist-Ohio Health, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mubashir Mumtaz
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Pinnacle, Wormsleysburg, Pennsylvania; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mathew R Williams
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, New York University-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Hemal Gada
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Pinnacle, Wormsleysburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Jae K Oh
- Echocardiography Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shuzhen Li
- Department of Statistical Services, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Arie Pieter Kappetein
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Regazzoli D, Chiarito M, Cannata F, Pagnesi M, Miura M, Ziviello F, Picci A, Reifart J, De Marco F, Bedogni F, Adamo M, Curello S, Teles R, Taramasso M, Barbanti M, Tamburino C, Stefanini GG, Mangieri A, Giannini F, Pagnotta PA, Maisano F, Kim WK, Van Mieghem NM, Colombo A, Reimers B, Latib A. Transcatheter Self-Expandable Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Small Aortic Annuli. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:196-206. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
28
|
Goel H, Kumar A, Garg N, Mills JD. Men are from mars, women are from venus: Factors responsible for gender differences in outcomes after surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2019; 31:34-46. [PMID: 31902553 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Females suffer higher operative (30-day) mortality than males after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). In contrast, outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) seem to favor females, both in terms of procedural mortality, and more prominently, medium to long-term survival. With an ever-greater number of TAVR procedures being performed, an understanding of factors responsible for gender differences in outcomes after the two AVR modalities is critical for better patient selection. Current evidence suggests that this gender difference in outcomes after SAVR and TAVR stems from differences in baseline risk profiles, as well as inherent anatomic/physiological differences between genders. This review attempts to examine these clinical and physiological factors, with a goal of guiding better patient selection for each AVR modality, and to highlight areas that beg further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harsh Goel
- Department of Medicine, St. Luke's University Hospital, Bethlehem, PA, United States; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Wellspan York Hospital, York, PA, United States
| | - Nadish Garg
- Department of Medicine, St Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, United States
| | - James D Mills
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, WV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tang GHL, George I, Bapat VN. Structural Valve Deterioration in Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comparing Apples to Oranges? J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73:2785. [PMID: 31146826 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
30
|
Moscarelli M, Fattouch K, Speziale G, Nasso G, Santarpino G, Gaudino M, Athanasiou T. A meta-analysis of the performance of small tissue versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56:510-517. [DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Small aortic prosthetic valves have been associated with suboptimal performance due to patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM). This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of patients with a small root who received tissue versus mechanical aortic valves.
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified 7 candidate studies; of these, 5 met the meta-analysis criteria. We analysed outcomes for a total of 680 patients (227 tissue valves and 453 mechanical valves) using random effects modelling. Each study was assessed for heterogeneity and quality. The primary end point was mortality at follow-up. Secondary end points included intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, the rate of PPM and left ventricle mass regression and major cardiac and prosthesis-related adverse events at follow-up.
RESULTS
There was no between-group difference in mortality at follow-up [incidence rate ratio 1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–2.01; P = 0.99]. The tissue group had a higher rate of PPM (odds ratio 17.19, 95% CI 8.6–25.78; P = 0.002) and significantly less reduction in ventricular mass (weighted mean difference 40.79, 95% CI 4.62–76.96; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the incidence of structural valve disease at follow-up compared to that in the mechanical valve group. There was also no between-group difference in aggregated adverse events at follow-up (P = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS
Tissue and mechanical valves were associated with similar mortality rates; however, patients receiving tissue valves had a higher rate of PPM and significantly less left ventricle mass regression. These findings indicate that patients receiving small tissue valves may require closer clinical surveillance than those receiving mechanical valves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Moscarelli
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Khalil Fattouch
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Speziale
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Nasso
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Santarpino
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care and Research, Anthea Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Mario Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Paddington, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Schechter M, Balanescu DV, Donisan T, Dayah TJ, Kar B, Gregoric I, Giza DE, Song J, Lopez‐Mattei J, Kim P, Balanescu SM, Cilingiroglu M, Toutouzas K, Smalling RW, Marmagkiolis K, Iliescu C. An update on the management and outcomes of cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 94:438-445. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schechter
- Department of Internal MedicineMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
| | | | - Teodora Donisan
- Department of CardiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Tariq J. Dayah
- Department of Internal MedicineMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
| | - Biswajit Kar
- Department of Internal MedicineMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
| | - Igor Gregoric
- Department of Internal MedicineMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
| | - Dana E. Giza
- Department of Family and Community MedicineMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
| | - Juhee Song
- Department of BiostatisticsThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Juan Lopez‐Mattei
- Department of CardiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Peter Kim
- Department of CardiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| | - Serban Mihai Balanescu
- Department of CardiologyElias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania
| | - Mehmet Cilingiroglu
- Department of CardiologyArkansas Heart Hospital Little Rock Arkansas
- Florida Hospital Pepin Heart Institute Tampa Florida
| | - Konstantinos Toutouzas
- First Department of CardiologyHippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University Medical School Athens Greece
| | - Richard W. Smalling
- Department of Internal MedicineMcGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
| | | | - Cezar Iliescu
- Department of CardiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Santarpino G, Albano A, Spirito A, Foggetti L. The Incidence of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Is Improving, But Can We Do Even Better? Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 107:987-988. [PMID: 30300639 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Santarpino
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany; Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Città di Lecce Hospital, Prov.le per Arnesano Km. 4, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
| | - Antonio Albano
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Città di Lecce Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Amanda Spirito
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Città di Lecce Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Foggetti
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, GVM Care & Research, Città di Lecce Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mihos CG, Klassen SL, Yucel E. Sex-Specific Considerations in Women with Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2018; 20:52. [PMID: 29923126 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-018-0651-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in the elderly and is associated with poor outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in high-risk patients. Herein, we describe the gender-related differences in baseline characteristics and pathophysiologic response to severe AS, imaging considerations unique to females, and short- and long-term outcomes after TAVR. Women undergoing TAVR are older and frailer, have less cardiovascular comorbidities, smaller femoral artery size, better left ventricular systolic function, hypertrophied and small left ventricles leading to a higher incidence of paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS, and a greater prevalence of porcelain aorta, smaller aortic annulus size, and lower coronary ostia heights. Imaging and histopathological data also suggests a sex-related myocardial response to pressure overload from AS. Women experience more vascular complications and blood transfusion requirements, serious procedural complications, and a greater incidence of stroke, but have better long-term outcomes than men. Patient-prosthesis mismatch, which is a concern in patients with a small aortic annulus size undergoing SAVR, has not been problematic with TAVR. The aforementioned findings suggest that TAVR may be preferable for women with severe AS. Further studies are warranted to directly compare TAVR with SAVR in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos G Mihos
- Echocardiography Laboratory, Columbia University Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Sheila L Klassen
- Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 5B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Evin Yucel
- Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 5B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Reply. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106:1263-1264. [PMID: 29859155 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
35
|
Vogt F, Zito MC, Santarpino G. Should TAVI Be Offered to Everyone to Avoid Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch? Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106:1262-1263. [PMID: 29730343 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Vogt
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauerstrasse 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Maria Cristina Zito
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Città di Lecce Hospital, GVM Care and Research, Lecce, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Santarpino
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Città di Lecce Hospital, GVM Care and Research, Lecce, Italy; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|