1
|
Waser NA, Quintana M, Schweikert B, Chaft JE, Berry L, Adam A, Vo L, Penrod JR, Fiore J, Berry DA, Goring S. Pathological response in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae021. [PMID: 38521542 PMCID: PMC11101053 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy are needed to provide earlier treatment outcome indicators and accelerate drug approval. This study's main objectives were to investigate the association among pathological complete response, major pathological response, event-free survival and overall survival and to determine whether treatment effects on pathological complete response and event-free survival correlate with treatment effects on overall survival. METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted to identify neoadjuvant studies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Analysis at the patient level using frequentist and Bayesian random effects (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival or event-free survival by pathological complete response or major pathological response status, yes vs no) and at the trial level using weighted least squares regressions (hazard ratio for overall survival or event-free survival vs pathological complete response, by treatment arm) were performed. RESULTS In both meta-analyses, pathological complete response yielded favorable overall survival compared with no pathological complete response (frequentist, 20 studies and 6530 patients: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.57; Bayesian, 19 studies and 5988 patients: HR = 0.48, 95% probability interval = 0.43 to 0.55) and similarly for major pathological response (frequentist, 12 studies and 1193 patients: HR = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.29 to 0.44; Bayesian, 11 studies and 1018 patients: HR = 0.33, 95% probability interval = 0.26 to 0.42). Across subgroups, estimates consistently showed better overall survival or event-free survival in pathological complete response or major pathological response compared with no pathological complete response or no major pathological response. Trial-level analyses showed a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival hazard ratios (R2 = 0.7159) but did not show a correlation between treatment effects on pathological complete response and overall survival or event-free survival. CONCLUSION There was a strong and consistent association between pathological response and survival and a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jamie E Chaft
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ahmed Adam
- Insights, Evidence and Value, ICON plc, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Lien Vo
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | - John R Penrod
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph Fiore
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | - Sarah Goring
- Insights, Evidence and Value, ICON plc, Burlington, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li X, Li Q, Yang F, Gao E, Lin L, Li Y, Song X, Duan L. Neoadjuvant therapy does not increase postoperative morbidity of sleeve lobectomy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1234-1244.e13. [PMID: 36965521 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility and safety of sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy by assessing the postoperative morbidity. METHODS Patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were retrospectively analyzed from January 2018 to December 2021. A total of 613 patients were enrolled, including 124 patients who received previous neoadjuvant therapy and 489 patients who did not. Propensity score matching was adopted to create a balanced cohort consisting of 97 paired cases. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for postoperative complications. RESULTS In the entire cohort, univariable logistic regression analysis showed that smoking history (odds ratio [OR], 1.501; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-2.229, P = .044), open thoracotomy (OR, 1.748; 95% CI, 1.178-2.593, P = .006), and operation time more than 150 minutes (OR, 1.548; 95% CI, 1.029-2.328, P = .036) were risk factors for postoperative complications, and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed open thoracotomy was an independent risk factor (OR, 1.765; 95% CI, 1.178-2.643, P = .006). In the balanced cohort, the neoadjuvant group had a lower proportion of double-sleeve resections (3.1% vs 11.3%, P = .035) and longer postoperative chest tube drainage (6.67 ± 3.81 vs 5.13 ± 3.74 days, P < .001). However, no significant differences were observed in postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (25.8% vs 24.7%, P = .869). The complete pathologic response of chemoimmunotherapy was significantly superior to chemotherapy alone (28.2% vs 4.1%, P < .001), and no significant differences were noted in postoperative morbidity in different neoadjuvant therapy modalities. CONCLUSIONS After neoadjuvant therapy, sleeve lobectomy can be safely performed with no increased postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiuyuan Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fujun Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Erji Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaqiang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Song
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Liang Duan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Association of Pathologic Complete Response and Long-Term Survival Outcomes Among Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC: A Meta-Analysis. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022; 3:100384. [PMID: 36118131 PMCID: PMC9472066 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Increased efforts to optimize outcomes for early stage NSCLC through the investigation of novel perioperative treatment strategies are ongoing. An emerging question is the role of pathologic response and its association with long-term clinical outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods To investigate the association of pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis identifying studies reporting on the prognostic impact of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. To evaluate this prognostic value, an aggregated data (AD) meta-analyses was conducted to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of EFS and OS for pCR. Using reconstructed individual patient data (IPD), pooled Kaplan-Meier curves were obtained to estimate this association in a more granular fashion. Subgroup analyses were conducted to further explore the impacts of study-level characteristics. Results A total of 28 studies comprising 7011 patients were included in the AD meta-analysis, of which, IPD was available for 6274 patients from 24 studies. Results from our AD meta-analysis revealed a pooled pCR rate of 18% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15%–21%), including significant improvements in OS (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.45–0.56) and EFS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.37–0.57) on the basis of pCR status. Our IPD analysis revealed a 5-year OS rate of 63% (95% CI: 59.6–67.4) for patients with a pCR compared with 39% (95% CI: 34.5–44.5) for those without a pCR. Conclusions pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus or minus radiotherapy is associated with significant improvements in EFS and survival for patients with resectable NSCLC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Roviello G, Catalano M, Santi R, Santoni M, Galli IC, Amorosi A, Polom W, De Giorgi U, Nesi G. Neoadjuvant Treatment in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: From the Beginning to the Latest Developments. Front Oncol 2022; 12:912699. [PMID: 35936721 PMCID: PMC9353067 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, diagnosed as muscle invasive in 25% of cases. Although several studies have demonstrated an overall 5% absolute survival benefit at 5 years with cisplatin-based combination neoadjuvant treatment, administration of chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients is still a matter of debate. This may be due to the perceived modest survival benefit, cisplatin-based chemotherapy ineligibility, or fear of delaying potentially curative surgery in non-responders. However, immunotherapy and novel targeted therapies have shown to prolong survival in advanced disease and are under investigation in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings to reduce systemic relapse and improve cure rates. Genomic characterization of MIBC could help select the most effective chemotherapeutic regimen for the individual patient. Large cohort studies on neoadjuvant treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and molecular therapies, alone or combined with chemotherapy, are ongoing. In this review, we trace the development of neoadjuvant therapy in MIBC and explore recent advances that may soon change clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina Catalano
- School of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Raffaella Santi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Camilla Galli
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Amorosi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Wojciech Polom
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Gabriella Nesi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Gabriella Nesi,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang B, Xiao Q, Xiao H, Wu J, Yang D, Tang J, Li X, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Wang W. Perioperative Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Open Thoracotomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Resectable NSCLC. Front Oncol 2022; 12:858189. [PMID: 35712494 PMCID: PMC9194512 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.858189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy becomes more widespread in the treatment of NSCLC, but few studies have reported the details of surgical techniques and perioperative challenges following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy until now. The primary aim of our study was to address the feasibility and safety of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy via different surgical approaches, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open thoracotomy. Methods Patients with an initial diagnosis of clinical stage IB-IIIB(T3-4N2) NSCLC, who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgery between January 2019 and August 2021 were included. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups (VATS, and thoracotomy), and differences in perioperative, oncological, and survival outcomes were compared. Results In total, there were 131 NSCLC patients included. Surgery was delayed beyond 42 days in 21 patients (16.0%), and radical resection (R0) was achieved in 125 cases (95.4%). Lobectomy was the principal method of pulmonary resection (102 cases, 77.9%) and pneumonectomy was performed in 11 cases (8.4%). Postoperative complications within 30 days occurred in 28 patients (21.4%), and no 90-day mortality was recorded. There were 53 patients (38.5%) treated with VATS, and 78 (59.5%) with open thoracotomy. VATS could achieve similar definitive resection rates, postoperative recovery courses, comparable morbidities, and equivalent RFS rates(p>0.05), with the advantages of reduced operative time (160.1 ± 40.4 vs 177.7 ± 57.7 min, p=0.042), less intraoperative blood loss (149.8 ± 57.9 vs 321.2 ± 72.3 ml, p=0.021), and fewer intensive care unit(ICU) stays after surgery (3.8% vs 20.5%, p=0.006) compared with open thoracotomy. However, the mean number of total lymph nodes resected was lower in the VATS group (19.5 ± 7.9 vs 23.0 ± 8.1, p=0.013). More patients in the thoracotomy group received bronchial sleeve resection/bronchoplasty (53.8% vs 32.1%, p=0.014) and vascular sleeve resection/angioplasty (23.1% vs 3.8%, p=0.003). After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, VATS still had the advantage of fewer ICU stays after surgery (2.3% vs. 20.5%, p=0.007). Conclusions Our results have confirmed that pulmonary resection following neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy is safe and feasible. VATS could achieve similar safety, definitive surgical resection, postoperative recovery, and equivalent oncological efficacy as open thoracotomy, with the advantage of fewer ICU stays after surgery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Galetta D, De Marinis F, Spaggiari L. Rescue Surgery after Immunotherapy/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Initially Unresectable Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112661. [PMID: 35681639 PMCID: PMC9179896 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been considered for a long time as an unresectable disease. Chemotherapy was considered the only therapeutic option for these conditions and the results were unsatisfactory. Recent advances in biology and immunology have led to the use of personalized treatments by using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which produce significant and durable treatment responses. Large trials explored the utility of TKIs and ICIs in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings, showing good results in terms of radiological response and long-term outcomes. Retrospective case series in patients with the previously unresectable disease who received treatment with TKIs, or ICIs showed important clinical changes that consider the possibility of pulmonary resection of the residual disease. They showed an overall feasibility for pulmonary resection but also raised concerns about the technical challenges. In the present study, we analyzed and reported the surgical and long-term outcomes of patients with initial unresectable, locally advanced, or oligometastatic NSCLC who were treated with TKIs or ICIs achieving a clinical downstaging so as to re-enter resectability. Abstract Background: We report the outcomes for unresectable patients with locally advanced or oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or immunotherapy who achieved a clinical downstaging so as to re-enter resectability. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and pathological data of 42 patients with histologically proven, inoperable NSCLC who received rescue surgery after a good response to TKI or immunotherapy between March 2014 and December 2021. Results: Of 42 patients, 39 underwent pulmonary resection with therapeutic intent (three explorative thoracotomies). There were 26 males, with a median age of 64 years (range, 41–78 years). Twenty-three patients received TKIs and 19 immunotherapies. Anatomic resection was performed in 97.4% of resected patients (38/39) including 30 lobectomies, one right upper sleeve lobectomy, five pneumonectomies, one tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy, and one bilobectomy; a patient underwent wedge resection. Of 10 procedures attempted via a robotic approach, two required conversion to thoracotomy. No intraoperative morbidity/mortality occurred. The median operative time was 190 (range, 80–426) minutes; estimated blood loss was 200 mL (range, 35–780 mL). Morbidity occurred in 13/39 (33.3%). The median length of hospital stay was 6.5 days (range, 4–23 days). Pathologic downstaging was 74.4% (29/39). With a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the 5-year disease-free interval was 46.5%, and the 5-year overall survival was 66.0%; 32/39 patients (82.1%) are alive, 10 with the disease. Conclusions: Lung resection for suspected residual disease after immunotherapy or TKIs is feasible, with encouraging pathological downstaging. Surgical operation may be technically challenging due to the presence of fibrosis, but significant morbidity appears to be rare. Outcomes are encouraging, with reasonable survival during the short-interval follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Galetta
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology-DIPO, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0257489801
| | - Filippo De Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology-DIPO, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sinn K, Mosleh B, Steindl A, Zoechbauer-Mueller S, Dieckmann K, Widder J, Steiner E, Klepetko W, Hoetzenecker K, Laszlo V, Doeme B, Klikovits T, Hoda MA. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in surgically treated stage III/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective single-center cohort study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100466. [PMID: 35397435 PMCID: PMC9058885 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is lack of consensus whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CHT/RT) is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) alone in patients with potentially resectable stage III/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated clinical parameters and outcomes in patients with clinical stage III/N2 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant CHT/RT versus CHT followed by surgery. Nearest-neighbor propensity score (PS) matching was used to correct for pretreatment differences. RESULTS A total of 84 patients were enrolled. Thirty-four (40%) and 50 (60%) patients received CHT/RT or CHT followed by curative-intent surgery, respectively. Overall 90-day mortality and morbidity were 0% versus 0.04% and 21% versus 18%, respectively, with no significant difference between the CHT/RT and the CHT-alone cohorts (P = 0.51 and P = 0.70). In the PS-matched cohort, complete pathological response was recorded in 25% after CHT/RT versus 0% after CHT at the time of surgery. Patients receiving neoadjuvant CHT/RT exhibited significantly better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) [45% versus 16% CHT group; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, P = 0.04]; 5-year overall survival (OS) was 75% after CHT/RT and 21% after CHT (HR 0.37, P = 0.001). CHT/RT more often induced pathological mediastinal downstaging (P = 0.007), but CHT/RT remained the only independent factor for DFS and OS and did not depend on mediastinal downstaging. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective PS-matched long-term analysis, neoadjuvant CHT/RT conferred improved DFS and OS compared with CHT alone in stage III/N2 NSCLC. These highly challenging results require confirmation in well-designed randomized controlled trials conducted at highly specialized thoracic oncology centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Sinn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Mosleh
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Steindl
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Zoechbauer-Mueller
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - E Steiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Landesklinikum Wr. Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - W Klepetko
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Hoetzenecker
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Laszlo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - B Doeme
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - T Klikovits
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - M A Hoda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on postoperative complications in non-small-cell lung cancer patients subjected to anatomic lung resection. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1947-1953. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
9
|
Kamel MK, Sholi AN, Harrison SW, Lee B, Port JL, Altorki NK, Stiles BM. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in the United States. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022; 32:860-865. [PMID: 35041520 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary resections following neoadjuvant therapy (NT) can be technically demanding. There is a paucity of data regarding the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches in that setting on the National level. In this study, we explored the trends of using MIS approaches following NT and its associated outcomes. Methods: The study included all adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent pulmonary resection following NT between 2010 and 2016. Propensity score (PS) matching (MIS versus open) was performed and the perioperative outcomes were compared. Results: The study included 11,287 patients who underwent pulomonary resection after NT. The percentage of patients undergoing MIS lung resection and the number of hospitals performing one or more MIS increased from 19% and 166 (2010) to 41% and 305 (2016), respectively. When compared with thoracotomy, MIS lung resections were more frequently performed in academic centers in patients with higher income (P < .001). In PS matched groups, the use of MIS was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (5 days versus 6 days; P < .001), compared with open approach. However, there were no differences between the two groups in readmission rate (P = .513), or 30-/90-day mortality (P = .145/.685). In multivariable regression analysis, MIS approach was not associated with worse long-term, all-cause, survival (confidence interval: 0.91-1.09). Conclusion: The use of MIS approaches after NT increased significantly over the study period and was associated with perioperative outcomes and long-term survival comparable to those noted with the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed K Kamel
- Department of General Surgery, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, Michigan, USA
| | - Adam N Sholi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sebron W Harrison
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Benjamin Lee
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Port
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nasser K Altorki
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brendon M Stiles
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Albert Einstein School of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Qiu B, Cai K, Chen C, Chen J, Chen KN, Chen QX, Cheng C, Dai TY, Fan J, Fan Z, Hu J, Hu WD, Huang YC, Jiang GN, Jiang J, Jiang T, Jiao WJ, Li HC, Li Q, Liao YD, Liu HX, Liu JF, Liu L, Liu Y, Long H, Luo QQ, Ma HT, Mao NQ, Pan XJ, Tan F, Tan LJ, Tian H, Wang D, Wang WX, Wei L, Wu N, Wu QC, Xiang J, Xu SD, Yang L, Zhang H, Zhang L, Zhang P, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhu K, Zhu Y, Um SW, Oh IJ, Tomita Y, Watanabe S, Nakada T, Seki N, Hida T, Sasada S, Uchino J, Sugimura H, Dermime S, Cappuzzo F, Rizzo S, Cho WCS, Crucitti P, Longo F, Lee KY, De Ruysscher D, Vanneste BGL, Furqan M, Sieren JC, Yendamuri S, Merrell KW, Molina JR, Metro G, Califano R, Bongiolatti S, Provencio M, Hofman P, Gao S, He J. Expert consensus on perioperative immunotherapy for local advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:3713-3736. [PMID: 34733623 PMCID: PMC8512472 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Qiu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kaican Cai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chun Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ke-Neng Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qi-Xun Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.,Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Science, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chao Cheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tian-Yang Dai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Junqiang Fan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhaohui Fan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital) and Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China
| | - Jian Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Dong Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yun-Chao Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China
| | - Ge-Ning Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Wen-Jie Jiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - He-Cheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong-De Liao
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong-Xu Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Jun-Feng Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lunxu Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Long
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing-Quan Luo
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai-Tao Ma
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Nai-Quan Mao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Xiao-Jie Pan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fengwei Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Jie Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wen-Xiang Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery II, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Li Wei
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Nan Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Thoracic Surgery II, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qing-Chen Wu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jiaqing Xiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shi-Dong Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital, 2nd Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Lanjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenfa Zhang
- Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kunshou Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yuming Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sang-Won Um
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Jae Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam, Korea
| | - Yusuke Tomita
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Watanabe
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakada
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Seki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toyoaki Hida
- Lung Cancer Center, Central Japan International Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shinji Sasada
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junji Uchino
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Sugimura
- Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Said Dermime
- Department of Medical Oncology and Translational Research Institute, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Federico Cappuzzo
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Rizzo
- Imaging Institute of the Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Filippo Longo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Kye Young Lee
- Precision Medicine Lung Cancer Center, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Muhammad Furqan
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jessica C Sieren
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sai Yendamuri
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Julian R Molina
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Giulio Metro
- Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Raffaele Califano
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Mariano Provencio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, Pasteur Hospital, BB-0033-00025, CHU Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Shugeng Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mielgo-Rubio X, Montemuiño S, Jiménez U, Luna J, Cardeña A, Mezquita L, Martín M, Couñago F. Management of Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in the Age of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194811. [PMID: 34638296 PMCID: PMC8507745 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The treatment of resectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 lymph node involvement is usually multimodal and is generally based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy followed by surgery, but the cure rate is still low. Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved survival in advanced and stage III non-resectable NSCLC patients and is being studied in earlier stages to improve the cure rate of lung cancer. In this article, we review all therapeutic approaches to stage III-N2 NSCLC, analysing both completed and ongoing studies that evaluate the addition of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Abstract Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with N2 lymph node involvement is a heterogeneous group with different potential therapeutic approaches. Patients with potentially resectable III-N2 NSCLC are those who are considered to be able to receive a multimodality treatment that includes tumour resection after neoadjuvant therapy. Current treatment for these patients is based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy followed by surgery and subsequent assessment for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In addition, some selected III-N2 patients could receive upfront surgery or pathologic N2 incidental involvement can be found a posteriori during analysis of the surgical specimen. The standard treatment for these patients is adjuvant chemotherapy and evaluation for complementary radiotherapy. Despite being a locally advanced stage, the cure rate for these patients continues to be low, with a broad improvement margin. The most immediate hope for improving survival data and curing these patients relies on integrating immunotherapy into perioperative treatment. Immunotherapy based on anti-PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors is already a standard treatment in stage III unresectable and advanced NSCLC. Data from the first phase II studies in monotherapy neoadjuvant therapy and, in particular, in combination with chemotherapy, are highly promising, with impressive improved and complete pathological response rates. Despite the lack of confirmatory data from phase III trials and long-term survival data, and in spite of various unresolved questions, immunotherapy will soon be incorporated into the armamentarium for treating stage III-N2 NSCLC. In this article, we review all therapeutic approaches to stage III-N2 NSCLC, analysing both completed and ongoing studies that evaluate the addition of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xabier Mielgo-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain;
- Correspondence:
| | - Sara Montemuiño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fuenlabrada, 28942 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Unai Jiménez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Cruces, 48903 Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain;
| | - Javier Luna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Ana Cardeña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Laura Mezquita
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Clínic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Margarita Martín
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
- Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Siciences, Universidad Europea, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoshino H, Aokage K, Miyoshi T, Tane K, Kojima M, Sugano M, Kuwata T, Ochiai A, Suzuki K, Tsuboi M, Ishii G. Correlation between the number of viable tumor cells and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment in non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy. Pathol Int 2021; 71:512-520. [PMID: 34115921 DOI: 10.1111/pin.13110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to determine the correlation between the percent viable tumor cells (%VTC) and the tumor microenvironment in resected non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy. We enrolled 72 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or chemotherapy (CT) prior to surgery. The ratio of the area of viable tumor cells to the total tumor area was calculated to obtain the %VTC. We also examined the number of CD4 (+), CD8 (+), CD20 (+) and FOXP3 (+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), podoplanin (PDPN) (+) cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and CD204 (+) tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In the CRT group (n = 37), the tumors had significantly lower %VTC than the CT group (n = 35) (P < 0.001). In both of the CT group and CRT group, the %VTC showed a significant positive correlation with the number of CD204 (+)-TAMs (P = 0.014 and 0.005, respectively). Only in the CRT group, a higher number of CD204 (+) TAMs was associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.007) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.015). In the CRT group, the number of CD204 (+) TAMs is associated with %VTC and prognosis, suggesting that these cells may have tumor-promoting effects on the residual lung cancer in specific microenvironments after CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironobu Hoshino
- Division of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.,Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keiju Aokage
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Miyoshi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenta Tane
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Motohiro Kojima
- Division of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masato Sugano
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kuwata
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ochiai
- Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Suzuki
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tsuboi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Genichiro Ishii
- Division of Pathology, Exploratory Oncology Research & Clinical Trial Center, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kang J, Zhang C, Zhong W. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: State of the art. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021; 41:287-302. [PMID: 33689225 PMCID: PMC8045926 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer mortality has decreased over the past decade and can be partly attributed to advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rapidly evolved from investigational drugs to standard of care for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In particular, antibodies that block inhibitory immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC, when administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Immunotherapy is associated with higher response rates, improved overall survival (OS), and increased tolerability compared with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. These benefits may increase the utility of immunotherapy and its combinational use with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with NSCLC. Early findings from various ongoing clinical trials suggest that neoadjuvant ICIs alone or combined with chemotherapy may significantly reduce systemic recurrence and improve long-term OS or cure rates in resectable NSCLC. Here we further summarize the safety and efficacy of various neoadjuvant treatment regimens including immunotherapy from ongoing clinical trials and elaborate the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. In addition, we discuss several unresolved challenges, including the evaluations to assess neoadjuvant immunotherapy response, the role of adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, the efficacy of treatment for oncogenic-addicted tumors, and predictive biomarkers. We also provide our perspective on ways to overcome current obstacles and establish neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Kang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung CancerGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of MedicineGuangzhouGuangdong510080P. R. China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung CancerGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of MedicineGuangzhouGuangdong510080P. R. China
| | - Wen‐Zhao Zhong
- Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung CancerGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, School of MedicineGuangzhouGuangdong510080P. R. China
- Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdong510515P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Qu JC, Soultanis KM, Jiang L. Surgical techniques and outcome analysis of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery complex sleeve lung resection: a 20 case-series study. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2255-2263. [PMID: 34012576 PMCID: PMC8107526 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Our study aims to explore the feasibility of uniportal video-assisted complex sleeve lung resection and summarize the surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. Methods From June 2016 to April 2020, a total of 20 complex sleeve pulmonary and distal tracheal resections were performed by the single surgical team at the Thoracic Surgery Department of the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. We defined cases as complex sleeve pulmonary resections if they required pulmonary segment sleeve resection, extended sleeve resection (lobectomy plus segmentectomy of the remaining lobe), sleeve pneumonectomy, lobectomy plus carinoplasty or neo-carina construction, pulmonary-sparing main bronchus resection plus carina reconstruction, and distal trachea resection with end to end anastomosis. Results The 20 cases comprised lung squamous cell carcinoma (n=11), lung adenocarcinoma (n=2), hamartoma (n=3), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n=2), carcinoid tumor (n=1), and pleomorphic carcinoma (n=1). The average blood loss during the operation was 250±126.17 mL (50–800 mL). The average operation time was 192.0±61.1 minutes. The average number of lymph node stations removed was 5.82±1.33, including station seven in all cases, and the median number of lymph nodes removed was 4.18±5.89. On the day of surgery, the drainage volume was 266±192.01 mL. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.37±1.86 days. Twelve of the 16 patients diagnosed with malignancy received postoperative chemotherapy. Granuloma formation at the anastomosis level led to stenosis in one case, and tumor recurrence occurred in one case. Broncho-esophageal fistula occurred in one patient after radiochemotherapy. The postoperative follow-up time was 15.6±10.7 months. The 30-day mortality was zero, and at one-year follow-up, only one patient had died of metastatic disease after the operation. Conclusions Uniportal video-assisted complex sleeve pulmonary resections are feasible when conducted by experienced teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Chen Qu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shang Hai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Lei Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shang Hai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Van Houtte P, Moretti L, Charlier F, Roelandts M, Van Gestel D. Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer: still an open question. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1950-1959. [PMID: 34012805 PMCID: PMC8107767 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) with or without chemotherapy has been used in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for decades. Numerous trials have investigated the potential survival benefit of this strategy, but despite greater knowledge of the disease, considerable technological developments in imaging and radiotherapy, and significant progress in surgery, many questions remain unsolved. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on this problem and discuss issues which still require elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van Houtte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florian Charlier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Martine Roelandts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kawai N, Kawaguchi T, Yasukawa M, Tojo T, Sawabata N, Taniguchi S. Surgical treatment for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a risk factor analysis. Surg Today 2021; 51:994-1000. [PMID: 33483786 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02206-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE While surgery is an effective treatment for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), it can be difficult, because affected patients are usually in a poor general condition. The present study investigated the risk factors of postoperative complications after surgery for SSP. METHODS Eighty-eight patients with SSP who underwent surgery from January 2006 to March 2018 were investigated. Clinical data were reviewed, and a multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS Eighty-four patients (95%) were males, and the median patient age was 72 years. Underlying lung diseases were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 58 patients (65.9%), interstitial pneumonia in 26 (29.5%), and others in 4 (4.5%). Postoperative complications developed in 21 patients (24%). Hospital mortality/prolonged length of stay occurred in 6 patients (7%). A multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative performance status (performance status 0-2 vs. 3, hazard ratio: 6.570, 95% confidence interval: 1.980-21.800) was an independent predictor of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION Surgery for SSP contributed to early chest tube removal and favorable outcomes. However, rare fatal events occurred, and the patient performance status was a risk factor for postoperative complications. A careful evaluation of each patient's performance status is needed to determine the need for surgical intervention for SSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norikazu Kawai
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kawaguchi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
| | - Motoaki Yasukawa
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Takashi Tojo
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Sawabata
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| | - Shigeki Taniguchi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
[Perioperative treatment for resected non-small cell lung cancer: Which option in 2020?]. Rev Mal Respir 2021; 38:74-86. [PMID: 33402250 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Surgery is the ultimate curative treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognosis for operated patients remains disappointing. Multiple randomized studies have shown that administering perioperative chemotherapy improves the prognosis and increases the cure rate by around 3-5%. The purpose of this article is to take stock of the role of perioperative treatments for NSCLC, which can be completely resected. Six questions were evaluated: 1) What is the place of (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy in 2020, among others in the early stages (IB)? 2) Can new chemotherapy agents be combined with a platinum derivative? 3) What is the place of radiochemotherapy for resectable NSCLC? 4) Is there a place for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT)? 5) Is there a place for targeted therapies for resectable NSCLC? 6) What is the place of immunotherapies in the perioperative period?
Collapse
|
18
|
Brascia D, De Iaco G, Schiavone M, Panza T, Signore F, Geronimo A, Sampietro D, Montrone M, Galetta D, Marulli G. Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082050. [PMID: 32722386 PMCID: PMC7465235 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debora Brascia
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Giulia De Iaco
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Marcella Schiavone
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Teodora Panza
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Francesca Signore
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Alessandro Geronimo
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Doroty Sampietro
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
| | - Michele Montrone
- Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70121 Bari, Italy; (M.M.); (D.G.)
| | - Domenico Galetta
- Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70121 Bari, Italy; (M.M.); (D.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Marulli
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Organ Transplantation and Emergency, University Hospital of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy; (D.B.); (G.D.I.); (M.S.); (T.P.); (F.S.); (A.G.); (D.S.)
- Correspondence: or
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Qu R, Ping W, Hao Z, Cai Y, Zhang N, Fu X. Surgical outcomes of segmental bronchial sleeve resection in central non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2020; 11:1319-1325. [PMID: 32198981 PMCID: PMC7180578 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to present the clinical and surgical results in patients who underwent segmental bronchial sleeve reconstruction. Methods The clinical and pathological data of 16 patients with central non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent segmental bronchial sleeve resection from April 2015 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Results According to the type of segmental bronchial reconstruction, procedures were divided into four types: right upper S6 sleeve lobectomy in three cases (type A); left lower lingular sleeve lobectomy in 10 cases (type B); left upper S6 sleeve lobectomy in two cases (type C); and left lower propriolateral superior sleeve lobectomy in one case (type D). A total of three patients (18.75%) experienced anastomotic complications, including two with anastomotic stenosis and one with anastomotic fistula. All patients achieved R0 resection. Apart from one patient who died of acute lung infection after surgery, the rest were successfully discharged. The average follow‐up time was 28 months, and the overall survival rates of patients at one, two, and three years were 80.0%, 53.3%, and 40.0%, respectively. Conclusions Segmental bronchial sleeve resection is complex in technique and may have an increased risk of complications compared to a standard sleeve resection, but it is an effective and safe procedure, especially for selected patients with central lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rirong Qu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Ping
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhipeng Hao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yixin Cai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ni Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Montemuiño S, Dios NRD, Martín M, Taboada B, Calvo-Crespo P, Samper-Ots MP, López-Guerra JL, López-Mata M, Jové-Teixidó J, Díaz-Díaz V, Ingunza-Barón LD, Murcia-Mejía M, Chust M, García-Cañibano T, Couselo ML, Puertas MM, Cerro ED, Moradiellos J, Amor S, Varela A, Thuissard IJ, Sanz-Rosa D, Couñago F. High-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone followed by surgery in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. A multi-institutional retrospective study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society). Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:447-455. [PMID: 32477011 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal induction treatment in potentially-resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains undefined. Aim To compare neoadjuvant high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with resectable, stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Retrospective, multicentre study of 99 patients diagnosed with stage cT1-T3N2M0 NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (high-dose CRT or CHT) followed by surgery between January 2005 and December 2014. Results 47 patients (47.5%) underwent CRT and 52 (52.5%) CHT, with a median follow-up of 41 months. Surgery consisted of lobectomy (87.2% and 82.7%, in the CRT and CHT groups, respectively) or pneumonectomy (12.8% vs. 17.3%). Nodal downstaging (to N1/N0) and Pathologic complete response (pCR; pT0pN0) rates were significantly higher in the CRT group (89.4% vs. 57.7% and 46.8% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p < 0.001)). Locoregional recurrence was significantly lower in the CRT group (8.5% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.047) but distant recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. Median PFS was 45 months (CHT) vs. "not reached" (CRT). Median OS was similar: 61 vs. 56 months (p = 0.803). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicity were observed. On the Cox regression analysis, advanced pT stage was associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001) and persistent N2 disease (p = 0.002) was associated with worse PFS. Conclusions Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, a higher proportion of patients treated with preoperative CRT achieved nodal downstaging and pCR with better locoregional control. However, there were no differences in survival. More studies are needed to know the optimal treatment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Montemuiño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino, 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - Núria Rodriguez de Dios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Martín
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Carretera de Colmenar Viejo Km9, Madrid, Spain
| | - Begoña Taboada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, bloque d. Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Patricia Calvo-Crespo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, bloque d. Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - María Pilar Samper-Ots
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, C/ Gladiolo s/n. Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis López-Guerra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Av. Manuel Siurot, S/N, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - M López-Mata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, San Juan Bosco 15, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Josep Jové-Teixidó
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera de Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Spain
| | - Verónica Díaz-Díaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Av. Ana de Viya, 21, 11009, Cadiz, Spain
| | - Lourdes de Ingunza-Barón
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Av. Ana de Viya, 21, 11009, Cadiz, Spain
| | - Mauricio Murcia-Mejía
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Av. del Dr. Josep Laporte, 2, 43204 Reus, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Marisa Chust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Carrer del Professor Beltrán Báguena, 8, 46009, Valencia, Spain
| | - Tamara García-Cañibano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Camino del Molino, 2, 28942, Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Luz Couselo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Central de la Defensa Gomez Ulla, Glorieta Ejército, 1, 28047, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Mar Puertas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Elia Del Cerro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, C/ Diego de Velázquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.,Universidad Europea de Madrid, Calle Tajo, s/n, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Moradiellos
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, C/ Diego de Velázquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Amor
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, C/ Diego de Velázquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Varela
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, C/ Diego de Velázquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - I J Thuissard
- School of Doctoral Studies & Research, Universidad Europea, Calle Tajo, s/n, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Sanz-Rosa
- School of Doctoral Studies & Research, Universidad Europea, Calle Tajo, s/n, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, C/ Diego de Velázquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.,Universidad Europea de Madrid, Calle Tajo, s/n, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bertolaccini L, Casiraghi M, Spaggiari L. Immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant settings: a new challenge for the thoracic surgeon? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020; 30:1-3. [PMID: 31740954 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivz272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertolaccini
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Casiraghi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Initial results of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant nivolumab in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 158:269-276. [PMID: 30718052 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Revised: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a phase I trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody to the programmed cell death protein 1 checkpoint receptor, in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. We analyzed perioperative outcomes to assess the safety of this strategy. METHODS Patients with untreated stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer underwent neoadjuvant therapy with 2 cycles of nivolumab (3 mg/kg), 4 and 2 weeks before resection. Patients underwent invasive mediastinal staging as indicated and post-treatment computed tomography. Primary study end points were safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant nivolumab followed by pulmonary resection. Data on additional surgical details were collected through chart review. RESULTS Of 22 patients enrolled, 20 underwent resection. One was unresectable; another had small cell histologic subtype. There were no delays to surgical resection. Median time from first treatment to surgery was 33 (range, 17-43) days. There were 15 lobectomies, 2 pneumonectomies, 1 bilobectomy, 1 sleeve lobectomy, and 1 wedge resection. Of 13 procedures attempted via a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or robotic approach, 7 (54%) required thoracotomy. Median operative time was 228 (range, 132-312) minutes; estimated blood loss was 100 (range, 25-1000) mL; length of hospital stay was 4 (range, 2-17) days. There was no operative mortality. Morbidity occurred in 10 of 20 patients (50%). The most common postoperative complication was atrial arrhythmia (6/20; 30%). Major pathologic response was identified in 9 of 20 patients (45%). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant therapy with nivolumab was not associated with unexpected perioperative morbidity or mortality. More than half of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/robotic cases were converted to thoracotomy, often because of hilar inflammation and fibrosis.
Collapse
|