Short-Term Outcomes of Tracheal Resection in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

New Insight into Laryngo-Tracheal Surgery: High-Flow Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Early Complications after Surgery

BACKGROUND

Early post-operative airway management after laryngo-tracheal surgery is crucial. Acute respiratory failure due to glottis' edema may occur, requiring reintubation. This can prolong ventilatory assistance, jeopardizing anastomosis. To date, only judicious steroid administration and fluid management are available to avoid more invasive procedures. High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is a noninvasive O2 support method providing humidification, warmed air, and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (AIRVO2). No data about HFOT use to prevent early complications after laryngo-tracheal surgery are reported in the literature.

METHODS

Between September 2020 and September 2022, 107 consecutive patients who underwent laryngo-tracheal surgery received HFOT (Group A). Data and long-term results were compared with those of 80 patients operated between September 2018 and August 2020 (Group B), when HFOT was not available. All patients were operated in a single center. No pre- or post-operative settings changed, except for HFOT introduction. We analyzed and compared the risk for "delayed" reintubation (unexpected reintubation within the first 24-48 h after extubating/laryngeal mask removal) in the two groups.

RESULTS

No patients reported HFOT-related adverse events. The control group (B) presented "delayed" reintubation in 37% (p = 0.027), intensive care unit admission in 67% (p = 0.005) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.001) compared to the HFOT group (A). The minor complications' rate was 3% in both group and overall mortality was 0%. Re-stenosis was described in 4.6% of the HFOT group, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.7006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to investigate HFOT use in patients undergoing laryngo-tracheal surgery, potentially representing a consistent innovation in the peri-operative management of these patients. With the limitation of a retrospective series, we would suggest HFOT use for preventing post-operative reintubation rate, possibly reducing ICU admissions and hospital stays.

Brazilian airway surgery survey indicates low overall numbers and need for improved teaching skills

OBJECTIVES

The Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgeons conducted an online survey to determine the number of surgeons that perform adult and paediatric airway surgery and to understand the practice patterns along the country.

METHODS

Active members were electronically invited to complete the questionnaire through the REDCapR platform. Invitations were sent from January to April 2020. The survey encompassed 40 questions that explored 4 different topics in the assessment of tracheal diseases: (i) surgeon's demography; (ii) institutional profile, (iii) education and training in laryngo-tracheal surgery and (iv) preoperative and postoperative evaluation.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine percentage of the responders declared to perform tracheal surgery with a median of 5 tracheal resection procedures per year [interquartile range (IQR) 3-12]. Interaction with other specialties occurs in 37.3% of cases. Access to technology and devices is highly variable across the country. Resident training in airway surgery consists in traditional lectures in 97% of the cases. Training in animals (15.2%), cadavers (12.1%) and simulators (6.1%) are rare. Preoperatory evaluation encompasses flexible bronchoscopy (97.8%) and/or computed tomography (CT) scan of the airways (90.6%). Swallowing (20.1%) and voice (14.4%) disorders are rarely evaluated. Eighty-nine percentage of the surgeons consider bronchoscopy to be the preoperatory gold-standard exam, followed by CT scan (38.8%) and CT-3D reconstruction (37.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian surgeons refer that airway resection and reconstruction are part of their current practice, but the total number of procedures per surgeon per year is low. Access to high-end technology and equipment is heterogenous. Training offered to residents in most academic institutions relies on traditional lectures.

A New Approach in Airway Management for Tracheal Resection and Anastomosis: A Single-Center Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The evaluation of the use of laryngeal mask airways (LMA) as an alternative form of airway management for surgical tracheal reconstruction.

DESIGN

A prospective case series.

SETTING

At a single German university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten patients.

INTERVENTIONS

The use of LMA for airway management in surgical reconstruction of the trachea.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ten patients with tracheal stenosis of 50% to 90% were enrolled prospectively during the study period. The airway management consisted of the insertion of an LMA. During resection and reconstruction, high-frequency jet ventilation was used. Several arterial blood gas analyses (ABG) were performed before, during, and after the tracheal resection and reconstruction. All values were presented as median and interquartile ranges or as absolute and relative values, and no emergency change to cross-field intubation was necessary. The lowest PaO₂ was 93 mmHg in 1 patient after 20 minutes of jet ventilation, whereas PaO₂ increased after the induction phase and remained stable in 9 patients. There were no intraoperative complications related to anesthetic management apart from transient hypercarbia during and after jet ventilation. Preoperative and postoperative ABG were comparable. One patient required immediate postoperative ventilatory support. Two patients developed postoperative pneumonia, leading to their admission to the intensive care unit. One patient was operated with a palliative approach due to massive dyspnea and died in the next postoperative course.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LMA is an alternative option in airway management for tracheal reconstruction, even in patients with significant tracheal stenosis. Potential advantages compared to tracheal intubation are unimpaired access to the operative field and the lack of stress on the fresh anastomosis.

Complex Post-intubation Tracheal Stenosis in Covid-19 Patients

 Management of tracheal complications due to endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an important concern. This study aimed to present the  results of patients who had undergone tracheal resection and reconstruction due to COVID-19-related complex post-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS). We evaluated 15 patients who underwent tracheal resection and reconstruction due to complex PITS between March 2020 and April 2021 in a single center. Seven patients (46.6%) who underwent endotracheal intubation due to the COVID-19 constituted the COVID-19 group, and the remaining 8 patients (53.4%) constituted the non-COVID-19 group. We analyzed the patients’ presenting symptoms, time to onset of symptoms, radiological and bronchoscopic features of stenosis, bronchoscopic intervention history, length of the resected tracheal segment, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and duration of follow-up. Six of the patients (40%) were female, and 9 (60%) were male. Mean age was 43.3 ± 20.5. We found no statistically significant difference between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 PITS groups in terms of presenting symptoms, time to onset of symptoms, stenosis location, stenosis severity, length of the stenotic segment, number of bronchoscopic dilatation sessions, dilatation time intervals, length of the resected tracheal segment, postoperative complications, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Endotracheal intubation duration was longer in the COVID-19 group than non-COVID-19 group (mean ± SD: 21.0 ± 4.04, 12.0 ± 1.15 days, respectively). Tracheal resection and reconstruction can be performed safely and successfully in COVID-19 patients with complex PITS. Comprehensive preoperative examination, appropriate selection of surgery technique, and close postoperative follow-up have favorable results.

Tracheal Resection after Previous Treatment Provides Comparable Outcome to Primary Surgery

BACKGROUND

 Tracheal and laryngotracheal surgery provides both excellent functional results and long-term outcomes in the treatment of tracheal stenosis. Consequently, challenging re-resections are rarely necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of (laryngo-)tracheal re-resection and surgery after bronchoscopic interventions with that of primary surgery.

METHODS

 Patients undergoing resection for benign tracheal stenosis at our center between 1/2016 and 4/2020 were included. Perioperative characteristics and functional outcomes of patients were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

 Sixty-six patients who underwent (laryngo-)tracheal resection were included (previous resection [A = 6], previous stent [B = 6], previous bronchoscopic intervention w/o stenting [C = 19], untreated [D = 35]). Baseline parameters were largely comparable between groups with exception from group B that had significantly worse lung function. Group A necessitated more complex reconstructions (end-to-end: n = 1: 17%| cricotracheal n = 2: 33%| cricotracheal with mucosectomy n = 2: 33%| laryngoplasty: n = 1: 17%) than patients in group D (end-to-end n = 21: 60%| cricotracheal n = 14: 40%). Postoperative outcomes were comparable throughout groups (intensive care unit: 1[1-18] days; hospital stay: 8[5-71] days). Anastomotic complications were higher after previous stenting (A: 0%; B: 33.3%; C: 10.5%; D: 2.9%; B/D p = 0.008| surgical revisions: A: 16.7%; B: 33.3%; C: 0%; D: 5.7%; B/D, p = 0.035). Overall, postoperative lung function was significantly better (forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 63% ± 24 vs. 75% ± 20; p = 0.001 | PeakEF 3.3 ± 1.9 vs. 5.0 ± 2.2L; p = 0.001). No 90-day mortality was observed in any group. Median follow-up was 12(1-47) months.

CONCLUSION

 In carefully selected patients treated in a specialized center, tracheal or laryngotracheal resection after previous tracheal interventions provides comparable outcome to primary surgery.

Tracheal Resection in the Management of Thyroid Cancer: An Evidence-Based Approach

OBJECTIVE

Determine the effect of patient demographics and surgical approach on patient outcomes after tracheal resection in the management of thyroid cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify patients with thyroid carcinoma who underwent tracheal resection. Pooled estimates for patient demographics, presenting findings, complications, and outcomes are determined using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety-six relevant studies encompassing 1,179 patients met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis pooled rates of complications: 1.7% (confidence interval [CI] 0.8-2.5; P < .001; I² = 1.85%) airway complications, 2.8% (CI 1.6-3.9; P < .001; I² = 13.34%) bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, 2.2% (CI 1.2-3.1; P < .001; I² = 6.72%) anastomotic dehiscence. Circumferential resection pooled estimates major complications, locoregional recurrence, distal recurrence, overall survival: 14.1% (CI 8.3-19.9; P < .001; I² = 35.26%), 15% (CI 9.6-20.3; P < .001; I² = 38.2%), 19.7% (CI 13.7-25.8; P < .001; I² = 28.83%), 74.5% (CI 64.4-84.6; P < .001; I² = 85.07%). Window resection estimates: 19.8% (CI 6.9-32.8; P < .001; I² = 18.83%) major complications, 25.6% (CI 5.1-46.1; P < .014; I² = 84.68%) locoregional recurrence, 15.6% (CI 9.7-21.5; P < .001; I² = 0%) distal recurrence, 77.1% (CI 58-96.2; P < .001; I² = 78.77%) overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Management of invasive thyroid carcinoma may require tracheal resection to achieve locoregional control. Nevertheless, postoperative complications are not insignificant, and therefore this risk cannot be overlooked when counseling patients perioperatively. Laryngoscope, 131:932-946, 2021.

Perioperative outcomes after tracheoplasty: A NSQIP analysis 2014-2016

OBJECTIVES

Tracheoplasty or tracheal resection and are essential components of the care of patients with severe tracheal stenosis. We aimed to study the perioperative outcomes of patients after tracheoplasty or resection using a national surgical registry.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2014 to 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) participant use file for patients who underwent tracheal resection or tracheoplasty (CPT codes 31750, 31760, 31780, and 31781). We analyzed the perioperative outcomes including length of stay (LOS), dehiscence, unplanned reintubations, unplanned surgeries, and 30-day readmission rates. A random 4:1 sample of non-tracheoplasty patients served as the control group.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2016, 126 patients underwent tracheoplasty. The median age was 56 years (IQR = 45-63). There were 93 (74%) females, 88 (70%) white, and 3.2% (4/126) Hispanic. The median LOS was 7 days (IQR = 5-10 days). Of these, 4.8% (6/126) developed wound infections and 3/126 (2.4%) developed wound dehiscence. Five out of 126 required unplanned reintubation (4.0%) and 16/126 (13%) had an unplanned reoperation. The 30-day unplanned readmission rate was 16% (20/126). The wound infection, unplanned intubations, and readmission rates were significantly higher (P < .005) than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day perioperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing tracheoplasty showed that adverse events are common, but severe adverse events such as death are rare. Continued research into risk mitigation among these patients is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:1514-1519, 2020.

Laryngo-tracheal resections in the Nordic countries: an option for further centralization?

PURPOSE

We aimed to obtain information on the number of Nordic centers performing tracheal resections, crico-tracheal resections, and laryngo-tracheal reconstructions, as well as the patient volume and the standard regimens associated with these procedures.

METHODS

Consultants at all Departments of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (ORL-HNS, n = 22) and Thoracic Surgery (n = 21) in the five Nordic countries were invited (April 2018-January 2019) to participate in an online survey.

RESULTS

All 43 departments responded to the survey. Twenty departments declared to perform one or more of the three types of tracheal resections. At five hospitals, departments of ORL-HNS and Thoracic Surgery perform these operations in collaboration. Hence, one or more of the tracheal operations in question are carried out at 15 centers. The median annual number of tracheal operations per center is five (range 1-20). Great variations were found regarding contraindications (relative and absolute) for surgery, the use of guardian sterno-mental sutures (all patients, 33%; selected cases, 40% of centers), prophylactic antibiotic therapy (cefuroxime +/- metronidazole, penicillin +/- metronidazole, clindamycin, imipenem, or none), post-operative follow-up time (range: children: 3-120 months; adults: 0-60 months), and the performance of post-operative bronchoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifteen centers each perform a low number of annual operations with significant variations in the selection of patients and the clinical setup, which raises the question if a higher degree of collaboration and centralization would be warranted. We encourage Nordic transnational collaboration, pursuing alignment on central management issues, and establishment of a common prospective database for future tracheal resection surgery.